The use of networks in organic synthesis - Journal of Chemical

Beginning students in organic chemistry have to overcome seemingly insurmountable tasks. They are learning a myriad of new compounds, physical concept...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Albert E. Z u n e and Ulrich Hollstein The University of New Mexlco

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106

The Use of Networks in Organic Synthesis

The synthesis of organic compounds presents problems to the beginning student in organic chemistry which to him seem unsurmountahle. He is learning a myriad of new compounds, physical concepts, reactions, their scope, .mechanistic pathways, and many other aspects, but when i t comes to even a simple two step synthesis, he is usually a t a loss. Without considerable exercise the student usually remains incapable of carrying out the typical analytical thought process which is required to solve a synthetic problem. In the years we have taught organic chemistry we have become aware of these difficulties and of several ways to solve them. We consider the synthesis of comnound Z from a eiven startinz- material A as the ulannine of a voyage, say by bus, from city A to city Z. One needs a map and a bus schedule. The best route will be determined by the shortest path, the quickest path, or a minimum number of transfers. Obviously, the plan does not start a t A only, but the possibilities of several intermediate stations and their connections are considered as well. T h e concept is easily translated into organic synthesis terms, in particular the well known trick to "work from

both sides." One can ask and the student can usually, after consulting his notes, easily answer the following questions 1) Where can I go fmm compound A, i.e., what are the chemical properties of the functional groups in A? 2) Where can I go from these products of A, say BI,Ba, B3,etc.? from the products fmm the B compounds, say 3) Where can

C1,C2, Ca,etc.? This process can he depicted as a fanning out from A, with possible overlap or crossing of the diverging lines. The diagram may he called a "synthesis tree" (Fig. 1). At the same time one can ask 1) How can I go to Z, i.e., what are the possible immediate precursors of Z or what are the modes of formation of the functional

groups in Z? 2) what are the pssible immediate precursors of the precursors of Z.. sav . Y,. - . Yv-.. Yn-.. etc.? 3) What are the immediate precursors of the precursors of the Y compounds, say XX,XZ,X8, etc.?

.

Aromatic Grouo Interconversions ~~

CHs 01

H H

NO,

NH?

SOsH

OH

HNOs I+H2S041

via NO,

450.

via NH.

via NH.

NeNH2 + NHs

X

F:via NH.

CI: viaNH.0~ C b + FsCl. Br: via NH20r

ifummgl

m

SH

RIalkyll

RX

+ AIXa

viaS01H

via SOsH

60 + FeBr. I: v i a N H 2 0 r

X

Mg. H z 0

ICI

viaNH~

O H (heal1

via NH,

viaCOOH or

RCOCH. (via ArCHfOR)

NOI

via NHm

NHx

HNO*.HsPOz or

HNOI. NaBH,

SOaH

HzO/H2S04

Hz,

via NH,

,,NO2,

Raney Ni

C

BF4

C"S12 CuBo

cuztl

via OH

CF>COOOH

via NHz

via NH.

via NHz

viaNHz

via SH

HNO.. He0

via X

HNOn,KSH

KOH 3WC

via OH

PC!..

or

CHaCOOOH or HNOZ. C u d N O d z vie OH

A

via OH

Zn + HCI

.

Zn. 5W.

via NH?

0,

IEtOl"POC1,Li NHj 1ig I d 19)) via COOH

via COOH

via COOH

via COOH

via S0.H

visS0.H

via COOH

via COOH

via COOH

HNOa

vieSOaH

visSOaH

viaCOOH

visCOOH

07

KMnOa or

viaCOOH

vie COOH

via COOH

naCOOH

HlOl viaCOOH

via COOH

01

via CH2NH,, CH2X or via CHZX

CHO COOH

A or A

or

via NHa

via NHI

+ cao

via CONHz + NaOBr (Hofmsnnl

via NHI

visCOOH

via COOH

via NHI

via CHnOH,

+ LAH

+ nucleoaoume

+ TsCl,

via NHx

07

via NH. or

viaCOOH

via COOH

via COOH

via COOH or peracid (Baeyer Villige.)

0

via COOH

viaCOOH

I1

C-H

16

/ Journal of Chemical Education

via COOH

via COOH

viaCOOH

via COOH

via COR via COOH or

viaCOOH

NHINH~,O H (W. K.1

or

Zn CHCI(Clemm.1

NH2NHz, O H I W . K.1 or Zn HCIIClemm.1

+

viaCOOH

This process is depicted as a set of converging lines, some of which may overlap or cross. By continuing this process a path P between, e.g., Ca and Xs will become apparent or, if the process has been carried to an extreme, an identity, e.g., Cz XI will have been established. The number of organic reactions that the beginning organic student is trying to memorize is overwhelming. Yet, any one of these reactions may be needed and must be kept a t one's fingertips in constructing the synthesis tree. This task, which initially often discourages the student, seems to require years of experience and practice. In such a study rationalizations and mechanistic insight is helpful, but any mnemonic device is a we)come extra tool. We have experienced that the students' memory is aided by the study of networks depicting possible routes between common functional groups attached to a constant (e.g., alkyl) group. Such a diagram is often easily imprinted in the visual memory. In the interconversion of functional groups it is helpful to identify families of functions and to show their interrelations in a network. We have done this for three families

--

by taking data from several undergraduate textbooks (14). Diagrams of the type shown in Figure 1 are involved in computer planned synthesis (5-7). Figures 2 and 3, the table, and a system for deriving synthetic pathways to polysubstituted benzenes from mono- and disubstituted ones (8) provide essentially the information necessary to build specific tree diagrams. Alkane, alkene, alkyne, olkyl halide, alcohol, amine, aldehyde, ketone and corboxylic acid (Fig. 21. These compounds are interre-

lated by simple electrophilic additions, eliminations, nucleaphilic substitutions, oxidations, and reductions. The diagram shows,

Figure 1. Construction of a "synthesis tree."

CN

via CHs or via X

via NHI

M,. CO.

0

0

C-R

C-H

11

COOH

RCOCl + AlCla

11

CO + HCl

or

MF. RCHO.

ME H L O ,

IRCOhO + AlClr

oildatlon

HCN + ZnCh

via NHn

via NH,

via NHl

via NH,

HNOz, Cu!CNh

viax

via X

viax

KOH, KCN.

via OH

viaOH

via OH

or via NHI via NHs

via NH2

via NHz

via NHz

5W-C

or via CN

+ AICls + HCI

or

Figure 2. Interrelation between aliphatic functional groups (excluding the carboxyi family.) a, Arrows arriving at or departing from t h e outside of the box refer to the general functional group. b, R does not necessarily contain the same number of carbons. R,OH

I via COOH

KMnO. or

via COOH

COCI, R k d

**a

1

Clr + h " ~ H10

croa

or

via SOaH

via SOsH

via SOaH

H,O, H'

+Grignard

via CHINH1.

via COOH.

c1aiSen

via SOaH

or H20.

OH-

via amide P203, A or SOCll,d

viaC00R

COCI, R&d

"is COC1,

via COOR. Claisen

LiAlltBuhH

or

KMDO. 07

Br2 +

CHZOH

or via COOH

+

viaCOOH

OH-

!o"ly on

via COOH

acetyl)

NaOH ~Cannirzam) or

KMnO,

via COOH

Figure 3. The carboxylic acid family. a, Transesterification with R 2 0 H , H+ gives RCOORI. b. If R f R I two additional anhydrides RCOOCOR and R,COOCORl areformed. Volume 51, Number 7, January 1974

/

17

clearly the key positions of alkyl halides and alcohols. The unique position of the Grignard complex is also apparent: it can only he made fmm the halide hut it can serve in numerous (seven in this diagram) reactions. CO1, nitrile, or the This family is related via the Grignard aldehyde with the next family. Carboxylic acid and deriuatiues (Fig. 3). Here we place the parent carboxylic acid in the center of a square, the comers of which are occupied by the four carboxylic acid derivatives: acyl ehloride, ester, amide, and anhydride. The amide carries a branch to the nitrile. Arrows indicate the possible interconversions and required reagents and catalysts. All reactions are nueleophilic displacements at the carbonyl function. The network shows clearly the unique position of the aeyl chloride, to which only one arrow points, and the somewhat lesser unique position of the anhydride (2 arrows). Both compounds can be used to prepare any of the other three and are "acylating agents" par excellence. A third family of compounds, unrelated to the previous, is the group of Aromatic compounds. The tahle represents the interrelationship of monosubstituted aromatic compounds. The reactions here comprise common aromatic electmphilic substitutions as well as aromatic nueleophilie substitutions, elimination/addition (via heuzyne) .and typical aliphatic sidechain intereonversions. I t can easily he seen that one can go from any functional group to any other functional group, including hydrogen, at the same position on the benzene ring, although the conversion sometimes requires several steps. Three examples will illustrate the use of the diagram. (1) To go from aniline to phenol: Look up NH2 in the left margin and proceed to the column under the heading OH. The entry indicates the use of nitrous acid (giving the diazonium ion) followed by decomposition with water. .(2) To go from a phenolic group to an amino group: This difficult step has recently become accessible with the new reagent 4-chloro-2-phenylquinazoline (9). (3) To go from cyano to halogeno: The entry "via C O O H indi-

+

18

/

Journal of Chemical Education

-

COOH (acid or alkaline cates that one must f m t look up CN hydmlysis). From carboryl to halogeno requires "via NHz" and one Looks up how to go from carboxyl to amino. The Hofmann hypohromite reaction is suggested. Finally, the conversion of amino. to halogeno is accomplished directly by a Sandmeyer type reaction. The tahle reveals some unique patterns. Certain groups can only be converted into any other group via the same intermediate, e.g., -(CO)R or -(CO)H via -COOH, or -NO2 via NH2. The synthetic importance of the aromatic NHz group as precursor of the diazonium ion is likewise apparent from the table. W e have found these charts helpful i n guiding t h e stud e n t throueh a svnthesis. T h e networks are limited to t h e most common interconversions and n o a t t e m p t is made t o exhaust all oossibilities. Also.. mour, - . transformations comprise only one aspect of organic synthesis. They m u s t be used in conjunction with construction of t h e carbon skeleton, a n d a knowledge of carbon-carhon bond formations, including ring formations, is required a s additional skill.

Literature Cited 11) Morrison. R. T.. and Bayd. T. N.. "Oraanie Chemistw," 2nd Ed.. Allyn and earnn,'~mton.M-., 1966. (2) Roberts. J. 0..and csacrio, M. C.. "B8.i~F?incir.lm of o m n i e Chemistw." W. A. Benjakin. & Co.. New York, 1965. (31 Handrickson, 3. B., Cram. D. J., and Hammond. G. 8.. "Organic Chemistry," 3rd F A McGraw-Hi... NeuYark. 19l0. Allinger. N . L., Caw. M. P.. & Jongh, D. C.. Johnson. C. R., -1, N . A., and Stevens, C.L.,"OrganicChemisfry," Worth.NcwYork. 1971. (51 Isenhow. T. L.. m d Jws, P. C.. "Intmdudion to Computer Raglamming fm Chcmiafa,"AUynandBaeon.Boatrm. Msa*.. 1972. D. 253. (6) Ugi. I., and Gillcnpie. P.. Angem. Chem, i n t e m t . Ed*. 10.915 (19711. (71 Cony, E. J.. Quart. Real.. 455 (19721. (81 Hendriekson, J.B..JAmer Chrm. Sac., OS,6&17andW(19711. (91 Sohomer, R.A,. andBeatty. H. R..J Or& Chem., 57.1681 (19721. (10) Goldkamp,A.H.efal.. J. Med. Chem.. S.UPJ(19651. ~