Transcriptomic and GC-MS metabolomic profiling analysis of

Jul 9, 2019 - ... DAFB) from 0.64 mg/cm2 (50 DAFB) to 1.75 mg/cm2 (80 DAFB), and then slightly decreased to 1.22 mg/cm2 during the fruit ripening peri...
0 downloads 0 Views 48MB Size
Subscriber access provided by IDAHO STATE UNIV

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

Transcriptomic and GC-MS metabolomic profiling analysis of epidermis provides insights into cuticular wax regulation in developing ‘Yuluxiang’ pear fruit Xiao Wu, Xinjie Shi, Mudan Bai, Yangyang Chen, Xiaolong Li, Kaijie Qi, Peng Cao, Mingzhi Li, Hao Yin, and Shaoling Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01899 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Jul 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on July 17, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 57

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Transcriptomic and GC-MS metabolomic profiling analysis of

2

epidermis provides insights into cuticular wax regulation in

3

developing ‘Yuluxiang’ pear fruit

4

Short title: Wax synthesis in developing pear fruit

5

Xiao Wu1, Xinjie Shi1, Mudan Bai2, Yangyang Chen1, Xiaolong Li1, Kaijie Qi1, Peng Cao1,

6

Mingzhi Li3, Hao Yin1*, Shaoling Zhang1*

7

1

8

Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China.

9

2

Pomology Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanxi, China.

10

3

Genepioneer Biotechnologies Co. Ltd, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, China.

11

Xiao Wu [email protected]

12

Xinjie Shi [email protected]

13

Mudan Bai [email protected]

14

Yangyang Chen [email protected]

15

Xiaolong Li [email protected]

16

Kaijie Qi [email protected]

17

Peng Cao [email protected]

18

Mingzhi Li [email protected]

19

Hao Yin [email protected]

20

Shaoling Zhang [email protected]

21

*Corresponding author: Hao Yin, Center of Pear Engineering Technology Research, Nanjing

22

Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; Email: [email protected]; Telephone:

Center of Pear Engineering Technology Research, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

23

+86-25-84396580

24

Shaoling Zhang, Center of Pear Engineering Technology Research, State Key Laboratory of Crop

25

Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;

26

Email: [email protected]; Telephone: +86-25-84396580

27

Abstract

28

The layer of cuticular wax covering fruits plays important roles in protecting against disease,

29

preventing nonstomatal water loss and extending shelf life. However, the molecular basis of

30

cuticular wax biosynthesis in pear (Pyrus) fruits remains elusive. Our study thoroughly

31

investigates cuticular wax biosynthesis during pear fruit development from morphologic,

32

transcriptomic and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) metabolomic perspectives.

33

Our results showed that cuticular wax concentrations increased during the early stage (20-80 days

34

after full bloom, DAFB) from 0.64 mg/cm2 (50 DAFB) to 1.75 mg/cm2 (80 DAFB), and then

35

slightly decreased to 1.22 mg/cm2 during the fruit ripening period (80-140 DAFB). Scanning

36

electron microscopy (SEM) imaging indicated that wax plate crystals increased, and wax

37

structures varied during the pear fruit development. The combined transcriptomic and

38

metabolomic profiling analysis revealed 27 genes, including 12 genes encoding transcription

39

factors (TFs) and a new structural gene (Pbr028523) encoding β-amyrin synthase, participating in

40

the biosynthesis, transport and regulation of cuticular wax according to their expression patterns in

41

pear fruit. The quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments of 18 differentially expressed

42

genes (DEGs) were performed, and confirmed the accuracy of the RNA-Seq derived transcript

43

expression. A model of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) and cuticular wax synthesis and

44

transport in pear fruit is proposed, providing a mechanistic framework for understanding 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 57

Page 3 of 57

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

45

cuticular wax biosynthesis in pear fruit. These results and datasets provide a foundation for the

46

molecular events related to cuticular wax in ‘Yuluxiang’ pear fruit, and may also help guide the

47

functional analyses of candidate genes important for improving the cuticular wax of pear fruit in

48

the future.

49

Keywords: Cuticular wax; Pear fruit; Metabolome; Transcriptome; Morphology

50

1 Introduction

51

Pear (Pyrus) is a Rosaceae fruit species with high economic value, and has widespread cultivation

52

throughout 80 countries and regions.1-2 The fruits of different pear cultivars vary in appearance,

53

aroma, sugars, acids, stone cells and soluble solid contents. The cuticle is a hydrophobic layer on

54

the primary surfaces of fruit, which is composed of a cutin polyester matrix and cuticular wax.3-4

55

Cuticular wax is beneficial to fruit by reducing mechanical damage, diseases and insect pests, and

56

also contributes to limiting water loss and extending postharvest storage.5-6 As such,

57

understanding the molecular mechanism of cuticular wax synthesis will lay a solid foundation for

58

enhancing the pear fruit quality. So far, the related functional genes involved in cuticular wax

59

synthesis, transport and regulation were mainly focuses in the model plants Arabidopsis and

60

tomato.7-8 In addition, several additional equivalent studies were obtained from other species, such

61

as citrus, mango and apple.5,9-10 For example, very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) play

62

important roles in wax synthesis, and VLCFAs biosynthesis can be regulated by fatty acid

63

synthases (FASs), fatty acid elongases (FAEs), β-ketoacyl-CoA synthases (KCSs) and long-chain

64

acyl-CoA synthetases (LACSs). Then VLCFAs are modified into different derivatives (aldehydes,

65

alkanes, primer alcohols, ketones, esters, etc.) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the products

66

of many genes, including CER1, CER4, CER17, WAX2 and MAH1. Finally, different wax 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

molecules can be transported to the plant surface by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and ATP

68

binding cassette (ABC) transporters. In addition, many transcription factors (TFs) are also

69

involved in this process, including MYBs, WRKYs and WRIs, have been identified.8,10-15 To date,

70

only several studies were focused on the fruit cuticular wax chemical composition or its crystal

71

morphology during pear fruit development and storage or different treatments.16-18 Thus, the

72

molecular mechanism of cuticular wax synthesis in pear fruit are still poorly understood.

73

Fruit development is a complex process, that is subjected to various factors, such as temperature,

74

hormones, light and genotypes.5,17,19 To maintain stability and for adaptation to various

75

environments, the cuticular wax content, composition and structure are dynamic changed during

76

the fruit development. For example, in the developing fruit of ‘Pingguoli’ pear, the wax

77

concentration changed little (min to max: 10.23-11.91 μg/cm2) from 30 to 100 days after full

78

bloom (DAFB), whereas the content dramatically increased from 10.23 μg/cm2 to 98.06 μg/cm2

79

from 100 to 130 DAFB.17 In developing citrus fruit, the total wax concentration increased

80

2.35-fold between 60 and 240 DAFB, and the total wax concentration of tomato fruit increased

81

from 3.98 μg/cm2 to 16.36 μg/cm2 between the immature green and orange stages but then

82

decreased to 13.75 μg/cm2 at the red overripe stage.5,7

83

‘Yuluxiang’ is a popular newly promoted pear cultivar with high good quality in China, which is a

84

hybrid progeny between ‘Kuerle’ (P. sinkiangensis) and ‘Xuehua’ (P. bretschneideri). In the

85

present study, five developmental periods of ‘Yuluxiang’ pear fruits were used to characterize

86

changes in cuticular wax and their relationships. We comprehensively analyzed the morphologic,

87

metabolomic and transcriptomic characteristics of the cuticular wax to provide information about

88

the dominant genes that regulate cuticular wax biosynthesis in pear. The key genes and regulatory 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 57

Page 5 of 57

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

89

factors participated in the pear fruit cuticular wax synthesis, transport and regulation were

90

explored for the further functional characterization. Comprehensively, an important foundation

91

should be provided for future molecular studies and the general regulatory mechanisms uncover of

92

pear fruit cuticular wax based on these data.

93

2 Materials and Methods

94

2.1 Plant materials and experimental treatments

95

‘Yuluxiang’ fruits were obtained from the Pomology Research Institutes of Shanxi in Jinzhong,

96

Shanxi Province, China. Fruit samples from different developmental stages were collected at 20,

97

50, 80, 120 and 140 DAFB. The fruits were collected from same three trees at different time

98

periods, and each tree was considered one biological repeat. At least 10 fruits from each tree at

99

each time periods were collected. All fruits were wrapped up through foam net bag and

100

transported promptly to the laboratory. Samples of the peel tissue of the fruits collected at each

101

time point were taken. After promptly freezing treated by liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C

102

refrigerator.

103

2.2 Chemicals and standards

104

All solvents and reagents were of analytical grade in this research. N,O-bis (trimethylsilyl)

105

trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA, containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane), pyridine and C7-C40 saturated

106

alkane standards were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China), and tetracosane was

107

purchased from Macklin Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

108

2.3 Extraction and determination of cuticular wax concentrations

109

The cuticular wax extraction was based on the method described by Li et al.17 with some

110

modifications. Extraction was performed on three biological replicates, each consisting of five 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

111

fruits. The whole pear fruits (five fruits per period) without trauma were immersed in 600 mL of

112

chloroform and dipped twice for 1 min at ambient temperature in fume hood. The solvent was

113

evaporated under a reduced pressure at 40°C.

114

2.4 Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and electron microscopy

115

Chemical analysis and electron microscopy were performed as described previously.20 The

116

extracted wax (1 mg) was dissolved in 1.5 mL of chloroform; 10 μL (10 μg/μL) of n-tetracosane

117

was added as an internal standard, and the solution was transferred to a GC sample bottle through

118

organic filtration (Φ 0.45 μm). Samples were blown down under a gentle stream of nitrogen and

119

dissolved in 40 μL of BSTFA and 40 μL of pyridine. After derivatization for 1 hour at 70°C, the

120

residual BSTFA and pyridine were blown dry under nitrogen, and samples redissolved with 1.2

121

mL of chloroform for GC-MS analysis was performed through a gas chromatograph (Bruker

122

450-GC) equipped with a mass-selective detector (Bruker 320-MS) and capillary column (30

123

m × 0.25 μm internal diameter, 0.25 μm film thickness, Bruker BR-5MS). The initial temperature

124

was 50 °C (isothermal temperature for 2 minutes), 20 °C/min to 200 °C by for 2 min, and

125

3 °C/min to 320 °C for 30 min. The inlet, MS transfer line and ion source temperature were set at

126

280, 280 and 250 °C, respectively. The wax compounds were detected via the NIST 2013 library

127

or by comparing their mass spectra and retention times with the standards. Saturated alkanes were

128

detected by the external standard method, and the other compounds were identified by comparison

129

with known amounts of the internal standard tetracosane.

130

2.5 RNA preparation and transcriptome sequencing

131

Total RNA was isolated from the peel tissues with the Column Plant RNA Out Kit (Fuji, China).

132

The concentration and integrities of the RNA samples were detected using agarose gel 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 57

Page 7 of 57

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

133

electrophoresis (1.0%), NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and

134

an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). On the basis of

135

the Illumina standard procedure, six library preparations were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq

136

2500 platform with PE125, which was performed at Genepioneer Biotech Corporation (Nanjing,

137

China). Each sample contained two biological replicates.

138

2.6 RNA-seq data and differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis

139

Adapter sequences, low-quality and poly-N tails reads have been removed to obtain clean data.

140

The clean reads from all three samples (two biological replicates each) were then mapped to the

141

‘Dangshan suli’ pear reference genome (http://peargenome.njau.edu.cn).1 Fragments per kilobase

142

per million reads (FPKM) values were calculated to evaluate the gene expression levels. The

143

DESeq2 package was used to identify the DEGs.21 The thresholds of false discovery rate (FDR)

144

≤0.05 and |log2ratio| ≥1 were set for significant gene expression differences between two samples.

145

Each set of differentially expressed unigenes were performed Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto

146

Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathway analyses. The singular

147

enrichment analysis (SEA) method was used to do the GO enrichment analyses by agriGO, in

148

which P < 0.01 and FDR < 0.05.22 We then perform two statistical tests (the hypergeometric

149

Fisher exact test, P < 0.01 and the Benjamini test, FDR < 0.05) to identify statistically significant

150

enrichment of KEGG pathways.

151

2.7 Correlation network construction and visualization

152

A correlation network between each metabolite and the transcriptome was constructed using all

153

eight metabolite accumulation profiles (alkanes, primary alcohols, esters, fatty acids, terpenoids,

154

aldehydes, ketones and other unclassified compounds) separately; the construction was performed 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 57

155

with R using the ‘rsgcc’ package in conjunction with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)

156

method.23 |PCC| > 0.95 and P