Chapter 21
Transdermal Drug Delivery System with Enhanced Skin Permeability Yie W. Chien and Chia-Shun Lee
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Controlled Drug Delivery Research Center, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, College of Pharmacy, Busch Campus, Piscataway, NJ 08854
A new generation of transdermal drug delivery (TDD) system was developed to contain one or more skin permeation enhancers in the surface adhesive coating layers. This TDD system has been found, experimentally, to release the enhancers to the surface of stratum corneum to modify the skin's barrier properties, prior to the controlled delivery of the active drug. The extent of enhancement in skin permeability appears to be dependent upon the chemical structure of drug to be delivered transdermally as well as the type and the concentration of enhancer used. The mechanism of skin permeation enhancement have been explored and are analyzed in this report.
Continuous infusion This
intravenous
has
mode
been
of
"first-pass" and a and
administration elimination
monitored of
control
drug
direct of
delivery
its of
the
is
of
a of
levels
in
into
the
patients
and
can
the
close
hepatic
prolonged,
body.
Therefore,
systemic
both
the
circulation
such
therefore,
of
delivery.
provide
However,
and,
rate
drug
constant,
the
levels.
risks
of
bypassing
infusion
drug
programmed mode
maintaining
drug
certain
the
Recently,
there
intravenous
drug
potential drug
To
as
drug
delivery
at
superior
capable
well
circulating of
a
mode
of
necessitates
medical
supervision
medication.
delivery
of
as
be
intravenous
entails
hospitalization
of
to
therapeutically-effective closely
advantages
of
administration
considered
is
a
growing
infusion
can
hazards,
by
using
administration
to
provide
into
the
systemic
accomplish
systemically
the
effective
recognition be
closely
the
intact
a
circulation
goals
of
drugs,
that
the
duplicated, skin
continuous
as
benefits without
the
portal
transdermal
drug
(_1 ).
transdermal several
controlled
transdermal
drug
0097-6156/87/0348-0281 $06.00/0 © 1987 American Chemical Society
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
delivery delivery
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
282
(TDD) systems have r e c e n t l y been d e v e l o p e d t o d u p l i c a t e the b e n e f i t s of continuous i n t r a v e n o u s drug infusion. The evolution of TDD systems began w i t h the development o f s c o p o l a m i n e - r e l e a s i n g TDD system (Transderm-Scop® by A l z a ) f o r 72-hr p r o p h y l a x i s o f motioninduced nausea (_2). The s u c c e s s f u l marketing of n i t r o g l y c e r i n r e l e a s i n g TDD systems (Deponit® by Pharma-Schwarz/Lohmann, N i t r o disc® by S e a r l e , Nitro-Dur® by Key, and Transderm-Nitro® by C i b a ) , as w e l l as isosorbide dinitrate-releasing TDD system (Frandol® tape by T o a e i y o , Yamanouchi) f o r once-a-day m e d i c a t i o n o f a n g i n a p e c t o r i s (3,4) have e s t a b l i s h e d TDD systems as an a c c e p t a b l e dosage form. Most r e c e n t l y , r e g u l a t o r y a p p r o v a l has been o b t a i n e d f o r a clonidine-releasing TDD system (Catapres-TTS® by Boehringer Ingelheim) f o r weekly t h e r a p y o f h y p e r t e n s i o n (4·) and an e s t r a d i o l r e l e a s i n g TDD system (Estraderm® by C i b a ) f o r twice-a-week treatment of postmenopausal symptoms (_5 ). It has drug d e l i v e r y fits: 1) 2)
3) 4)
5)
6) 7)
been offers
recognized that transdermal one or more o f the f o l l o w i n g
rate-controlled p o t e n t i a l bene-
Avoidance o f the r i s k s and the i n c o n v e n i e n c e s o f i n t r a venous t h e r a p y . P r e v e n t i o n o f the v a r i a t i o n i n a b s o r p t i o n and metabolism, as w e l l as the p o t e n t i a l i r r i t a t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h o r a l drug a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . C o n t i n u i t y of drug a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , p e r m i t t i n g the use of a drug w i t h s h o r t b i o l o g i c a l h a l f - l i f e . Efficacy can be a c h i e v e d w i t h reduced d a i l y dosage o f drug by c o n t i n u i n g drug i n p u t and b y p a s s i n g h e p a t i c f i r s t pass e l i m i n a t i o n . L e s s chance o f o v e r - o r u n d e r - d o s i n g as the r e s u l t o f p r o l o n g e d , preprogrammed d e l i v e r y o f drug a t the r e q u i r e d therapeutic rate. Provision of a s i m p l i f i e d t h e r a p e u t i c regimen, leading to a b e t t e r p a t i e n t c o m p l i a n c e . Ability t o e a s i l y t e r m i n a t e the m e d i c a t i o n , as needed, by s i m p l y removing the TDD system from the s k i n s u r f a c e .
Interest i n the potential biomedical applications of the r a t e - c o n t r o l l e d t r a n s d e r m a l drug a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i s f u r t h e r demons t r a t e d by the s u b s t a n t i a l i n c r e a s e i n r e s e a r c h and development a c t i v i t i e s i n many h e a l t h c a r e i n s t i t u t i o n s ( 3 , 6 , 7 ) . The p o t e n t i a l drug c a n d i d a t e s e v a l u a t e d have ranged from the a n t i - h y p e r t e n s i v e , antianginal, anti-histamine, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antia r t h r i t i c , s t e r o i d a l to c o n t r a c e p t i v e drugs. I t has been e s t i m a t e d by m a r k e t i n g a n a l y s i s e x p e r t s t h a t over 10% o f the drug p r o d u c t s w i l l be marketed i n TDD systems w i t h i n the next 5 y e a r s . However, i t has been i n c r e a s i n g l y r e c o g n i z e d t h a t not e v e r y drug can be administered t r a n s d e r m a l l y at a r a t e sufficiently h i g h enough t o a c h i e v e a b l o o d l e v e l t h a t i s t h e r a p e u t i c a l l y benef i c i a l f o r systemic medication. An i n c r e a s i n g number o f b i o m e d i c a l r e s e a r c h e r s working i n the f i e l d s o f t r a n s d e r m a l drug delivery
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
have g r a d u a l l y d i s c o v e r e d the p o t e n t i a l systemic medications (6,7).
limitations
283 of transdermal
As an example o f a p o t e n t i a l l i m i t a t i o n , the drugs listed i n F i g u r e 1 have r a t h e r low m o l e c u l a r weights and r e l a t i v e l y s i m i l a r in molecular size. However, t h e i r skin permeation rates vary as much as 100 f o l d s (2 mcg/cm /hr f o r f e n t a n y l v s . 200 mcg/cm /hr for ephedrine). This difference i n skin p e r m e a b i l i t y w i l l be r e f l e c t e d i n the s i z e o f TDD system r e q u i r e d t o d e l i v e r t h e e f f e c t i v e d a i l y dose ( T a b l e I ) . A TDD system h a v i n g a d r u g - r e l e a s i n g s u r f a c e a r e a o f 90 cm i s e x p e c t e d t o be r e q u i r e d f o r the d e l i v e r y o f d i e t h y l c a r b a m a z i n e a t a d a i l y dose o f 215 mg/day. From the s t a n d p o i n t o f p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s , a TDD system o f t h i s size would n o t be n e i t h e r d e s i r a b l e n o r e c o n o m i c a l . 2
2
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
2
To deliver a therapeutically-effective dose transdermally u s i n g a TDD system w i t h a r e a s o n a b l e s i z e ( e . g . , _< 20 c m ) , the b a r r i e r p r o p e r t i e s o f the s k i n f o r drug permeation must be overcome to e f f e c t i v e l y deliver the drugs t r a n s d e r m a l l y a t a c o n t r o l l e d rate. The f o l l o w i n g approaches have been shown t o p o t e n t i a l l y d e c r e a s e the s k i n ' s b a r r i e r p r o p e r t i e s and enhance the t r a n s d e r m a l permeation o f the drugs (8): 2
1)
2)
3)
P h y s i c a l approach a) Iontophoresis b) U l t r a s o n i c energy c) Thermal energy d) S t r i p p i n g o f s t r a t u m corneum e) H y d r a t i o n o f s t r a t u m corneum Chemical approach a) Synthesis of l i p o p h i l i c analogs b) D e l i p i d i z a t i o n o f s t r a t u m corneum c) C o - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f s k i n permeation enhancer B i o c h e m i c a l approach a) S y n t h e s i s o f b i o c o n v e r t i b l e prodrugs b) C o - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f s k i n metabolism i n h i b i t o r s
Development of Skin Permeation Enhancers-releasing TDD System The s k i n p e r m e a b i l i t y o f drugs has been r e p o r t e d l y improved by treating the s t r a t u m corneum s u r f a c e w i t h an a p p r o p r i a t e skin p e r m e a t i o n enhancer. Representatives of p o t e n t i a l skin permeation enhancers a r e l i s t e d i n Chart I . In this investigation, t h e concept o f promoting the s k i n permeability o f drugs by s k i n permeation enhancers i s a p p l i e d i n the p r a c t i c e o f t r a n s d e r m a l c o n t r o l l e d drug d e l i v e r y by d e v e l oping a skin-permeation-enhancing (SPE) Transdermal D e l i v e r y System (_9 ). In b r i e f , the SPE-transdermal d e l i v e r y system i s f a b r i c a t e d by f i r s t d i s p e r s i n g drug, l i k e s t e r o i d , homogeneously, as m i c r o r e s e r v o i r s , i n the s i l i c o n e e l a s t o m e r m a t r i x . F o l l o w i n g the c r o s s l i n k i n g and c u r i n g o f the d r u g - d i s p e r s e d polymer m a t r i x i n the d e v i c e maker, t h e d r u g - r e l e a s i n g s u r f a c e was then c o a t e d with
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
284
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Di»thylcorbomoiin»
Eph»drin«
NitroglycTin
ÇON(C,H,),
HOCHCHNHCH
CH,-ON0 I CH-ONO, I
Ο
2
ι
(200M9/cm /hr)
Scopo|omin»
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
CH -OW0 2
(lOO p g / c m V h r )
2
(13 pg/cmVhr) F—itpnyl
Chlorph»nironnin« CH CH N(CH ) 2
2
2
3
2
CH CH CON-^ 3
CH OH
^-CH CH ~C H
2
a
2
t
s
2
OOCCH C.H
O r
some
1.
(3.5 p g / c m V h r )
Chemical
representative
Table I:
CI
S
(3.8 p g / c m V h r )
Figure
C.H,
Comparison
structure
drugs
(Data
and adapted
(2 /cm /hr)
skin
permeation
of
i n Skin Permeation Rate and Required TDD Size
Skin
Effective Daily
Rate )
Treatment
1
(mg/cm /day) 2
Ephedrine
4.8
Diethylcarbamazine
2.4
Fentanyl
0.048
1) Data c a l c u l a t e d
rate
f r o m R e f e r e n c e 13).
Permeation Drugs
2
Me
Nasal congestion Filariasis infection Postoperative analgesia
TDD
Dose ^
Size
(mg/day)
(cm )
150-400 (oral) 215 (oral) 0.6-2.4 (i.m.)
31.3-83.3
2
2
89.6
from R e f e r e n c e 13
2) Data from R e f e r e n c e 12
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
12.5-50
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
285
multi-laminates of skin permeation enhancer-containing adhesive by lamination technique (Figure 2 ) .
silicone
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
This new type of transdermal drug delivery system i s capable of releasing one or a combination of two or more skin permeation enhancers to the stratum corneum surface in order to modify the skin's barrier properties ( 1 0 ) , p r i o r to the controlled delivery of the active drug, and the skin becomes more permeable to the drug (Figure 3 ) . In v i t r o skin permeation studies i n a hydrodynamically wellcalibrated skin permeation c e l l (Figure 4) demonstrated that simple pharmaceutical excipients, l i k e capric acid (a saturated straightchain fatty acid), can substantially enhance the trandermal permeation rate of progesterone. The time lag i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y reduced, while the zero-order skin permeation rate p r o f i l e i s maintained (Figure 5 ) . The same phenomena have also been observed with other types of enhancers examined. The extent of enhancement can be expressed as a parameter, c a l l e d enhancement factor, which is calculated from the following relationship: „ , ^ Enhancement Factor
(Normalized skin permeation rate) (Normalized skin permeation rate) r
, enhancer ^ control
It i s interesting to note that the enhancement of skin permeation of drugs by fatty acid i s dependent upon the a l k y l chain length (Figure 6 ) . In addition, the e s t e r i f i c a t i o n of the carboxy l i c acid group reduces the effectiveness of fatty acids i n skin permeation enhancement. The type of enhancer used and i t s concent r a t i o n in the adhesive coating also play an important role in the extent of skin permeation (Figure 7 ) . In addition to progesterone, which i s r e l a t i v e l y skin permeable, the propyl esters of myristic acid (a long-chain saturated fatty acid) and of o l e i c acid (a long-chain unsaturated fatty acid) are also capable of promoting the rate of skin permeation for the less permeable s t e r o i d a l drugs (Table II). The skin permeation rates for the s t e r o i d a l anti-inflammatory agents, l i k e hydrocortisone, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, l i k e indomethacin, and estrogenic steroids, l i k e e s t r a d i o l , have a l l been substantially enhanced. The effectiveness of skin permeation enhancer appears to be dependent upon i t s location in the TDD system. The extent of skin permeation enhancement i s greater when the enhancer i s incorporated in the adhesive layer (Table III). In addition to the esters of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, azone and decylmethyl sulfoxide are also very e f f e c t i v e in enhancing the skin permeability of drugs (Table II and Figure 6). Results appear to suggest the possible existence of a r e l a t i o n ship between the skin permeability enhancement of a drug, molecular structure of the drug, as well as the type of enhancer used. The skin permeability can be further improved by incorporating
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
286
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Chart
I . S k i n P e r m e a t i o n Enhancer
1) Azone
3
N-CH (CH ) CH 2
2
I 0
)
Decyl Methyl Sulfoxide
CH
3
2) Oleic Acid
CH (CH ),CH
3
2
2
3
4) Capric Acid
Ο
Ο
HO —
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Used
H
O
CH (CH ) CH -CH 2
2
5
2
— CH
2
(CHj) CH 7
3
CH (CH ) CH -CH 3
Drug - impermeable b a c k i n g laminate
2
6
2
)
Drug r e s e r v o i r / p o l y m e r i c
SPE-releasing
adhesive
matrix multilaminate
Drug (s) E n h a n c e r (s) Figure 2. The c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l view o f a s k i n - p e r m e a b i l i t y e n h a n c i n g TDD system, showing v a r i o u s major s t r u c t u r a l com ponents .
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
STRATUM CORNEUM ! Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
287
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
F i g u r e 3. An expanded diagram t o enhancing the s k i n permeation of one o r more enhancers t o s k i n s u r f a c e characteristics o f s t r a t u m corneum delivery of a therapeutically active
PAPILLARY LAYER ! CAPILLARY ! NETWORK
ILOOD CIRCULATION ! !
i l l u s t r a t e the concept o f drugs by f i r s t releasing t o m o d i f y the p e r m e a b i l i t y p r i o r t o the c o n t r o l l e d drug.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
288
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
DONOR COMPARTMENT
AIR I 4
Figure 4. Diagrammatic i l l u s t r a t i o n of a hydrodynamically well-calibrated skin permeation c e l l (reproduced from Ref. 11). The c e l l consists of two compartments in vertical arrangement: A donor compartment, which i s exposed to an ambient condition and a receptor compartment, which i s maintained at 37°C by c i r c u l a t i n g a thermostated water through the water-jacket. The solution hydrodynamics i n the receptor compartment i s kept at constant by a Tefloncoated starhead magnet rotating at 600 rpm by a synchronous motor mounted d i r e c t l y underneath the c e l l mounting block. One unit of the skin-permeation enhancing (SPE) Transdermal Therapeutic System i s sandwiched between the donor and receptor compartments with i t s SPE-releasing adhesive layer i n intimate contact with the stratum corneum surface and the skin permeation p r o f i l e s were characterized by sampling the receptor solution at regular i n t e r v a l s , for up to 32 hours, and assaying the samples by a s t a b i l i t y - i n d i c a t i n g HPLC method.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
21.
CHIEN AND L E E
Figure
5.
progesterone rated
fatty
Enhancement by acid,
289
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
various
in
the
skin
concentrations
released
from
the
permeation of
capric
adhesive
profiles acid,
coating
a
layer.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
of satu-
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
290
•
CH (CH >nC00H 3
2
Ο CH (CH )nC00C H7 2
3
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
S
3
30
NUMBER OF CH GROUP (n) 2
F i g u r e 6. Dependency o f t h e enhancement f a c t o r f o r t h e s k i n permeation o f p r o g e s t e r o n e on t h e a l k y l c h a i n l e n g t h o f s a t u r a t e d f a t t y a c i d s w i t h maximum enhancement a t n=6, and t h e e f f e c t o f e s t e r i f i c a t i o n on s k i n permeation enhancement. 50 Decyl Methyl Sulfoxide
Ο
Azone -Ο—Capric
Acid
ζ LU 5
LU
Ο Ζ
4?---©
·©
10
15
Oleic Acid
< Σ Ζ
5
ENHANCER
CONC.
20
( %m ) m
2
F i g u r e 7. Dependency o f enhancement f a c t o r f o r t h e s k i n perme a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r o n e on t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f v a r i o u s skin permeation enhancers.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
Table
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
291
I I : Enhancement of Skin Permeability of Various Drugs by Different Types of Enhancers ^ 3
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Drugs
Progesterone Estradiol Indomethacin Hydrocortisone
Skin Permeation Rate (mcg/cm^/day)
36.72 29.29 9.36 1.10
± 10.32 ± 24.48 ± 0.08 ± 0.12
Enhancement Factor propyl myristate
propyl oleate
Azone
Decylmethyl sulfoxide
4.56 9.33 3.77 4.57
5.36 14.62 4.67 5.01
5.96 20.17 14.49 61.30
11.04 12.59 15.67 25.23
a) Unit concentration of enhancer i n the adhesive
layer = 3.2 mg/cm
2
3
Table I I I : E f f e c t of the Location of Skin Permeation Enhancer ^ on the Enhancement of Progesterone Permeability
Location
Polymer matrix Adhesive f i l m
Skin Permeation Rate (meg/cm^/day)
34.6 ± 0.5 36.7 ± 10.3
Enhancement Factor propyl myristate
propyl oleate
Azone
Decylmethyl sulfoxide
2.67 4.56
4.05 5.36
2.56 5.96
3.81 11.04
a) The same amount of an enhancer was incorporated either i n the drug-containing polymer matrix or i n the drug-free adhesive film.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
292
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
a combination of two or more different types of enhancers i n the adhesive layer, such as the combination of azone with o l e y l acetate, or reduced, such as the combination of azone with propyl oleate (Table IV).
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Mechanisms of Skin Permeation Enhancement Transdermal delivery of drugs and other small molecules through the skin can be regarded as consisting of a process of dissolution and molecular d i f f u s i o n through a composite structure. The p r i n c i pal barrier to d i f f u s i o n i s the stratum corneum. A simplistic two-phase model has been proposed, which describes the stratum corneum as a hydrophilic protein gel dispersing i n a continuous l i p i d matrix (Figure 8). The penetrant molecules must migrate through by dissolution and Fickian d i f f u s i o n (13). If this two-phase model (Figure 8) i s v a l i d , d e l i p i d i z a t i o n of the stratum corneum, which dissolves away the l i p i d matrix, by organic solvent, from the skin composite structure (14), should improve the skin permeability of drugs. Results from the d e l i p i d i z a t i o n studies indicated that the enhancers releasing from the adhesive coating of SPE-Transdermal Delivery System s t i l l enhance the permeation of progesterone across the d e l i p i d i z e d skin with constant permeation p r o f i l e and reduced time lag (Figure 9). The extent of skin permeation enhancement i s dependent upon the type of enhancer released. The same phenomena were also observed (Figure 10) when the stratum corneum layer was t o t a l l y removed by stripping technique (15). The results appear to suggest that the skin permeation enhancers studied also promote the permeation of progesterone across the hydrophilic viable skin of epidermis and dermis. The results summarized i n Table V indicate that i n the control system (contains no skin permeation enhancer), the skin permeation rate of progesterone increases by 143% when stratum corneum i s delipidized. The enhancement i s 843% when the stratum corneum is t o t a l l y eliminated. As a low surface concentration of enhancer (3 mg/cm^) i s incorporated into the adhesive coating, the enhancing effect on the permeation across the d e l i p i d i z e d skin shows no statistical difference among the enhancers studied. A l l four types of skin permeation enhancers were observed to promote the permeation of progesterone across the intact skin. Azone and o l e i c acid are more e f f e c t i v e than capric acid and decylmethyl sulfoxide in enhancing the permeation rate of progesterone across the intact skin, which i s approximately the same as that across the stripped skin. However, the rates of permeation across the intact and d e l i p i d i z e d skin, under the effect of capric acid and decylmethyl sulfoxide, are rather similar i n magnitude. The results suggest that azone and o l e i c acid may promote the skin permeation of progesterone v i a the l i p i d matrix pathway, while capric acid and decylmethyl sulfoxide may enhance the permeability of the hydrophilic protein gel to the transport of progesterone, a l i p o p h i l i c molecule.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
293
Table IV: Skin Permeability Enhancement of Indomethacin by Combination of Permeation Enhancers 3
Skin Permeation Enhancers ^
Azone " "
Azone propyl oleate o l e i c acid o l e y l alcohol o l e y l acetate mono-olein
"
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
11
Azone " "
14.49 8.44 13.47 15.25 18.96 7.19
myristyl alcohol propyl myristate myristyl N, Ndimethylamide
11
a
Enhancement Factor
5.10 8.98 12.02
^ U n i t concentration of enhancer i n the adhesive layer = 3.2 mg/cm^ (Equal concentration for #1 and #2 enhancers) Stratum Corneum
1
"p7
1
Τ P.
Lipid Matrix
ΊΓ Ph
+
(P,)
Hydrophilic Protein Gel
(P ) h
Hydrodynamic Diffusion Layer
Figure 8. Diagrammatic i l l u s t r a t i o n of the two-phase model which describes the stratum corneum as a hydrophilic protein gel dispersing i n a continuous l i p i d matrix.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
294
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
S
0
8
16 Time
24
32
40
(hours)
F i g u r e 9. P e r m e a t i o n p r o f i l e s o f p r o g e s t e r o n e a c r o s s a d e l i p i d i z e d s k i n and t h e e f f e c t o f v a r i o u s s k i n p e r m e a t i o n e n h a n c e r s . Keys: Control device (C) and e n h a n c e r - r e l e a s i n g d e v i c e (Aazone, O A - o l e i c a c i d , C A - c a p r i c a c i d , DMS-Decylmethyl sulfoxide).
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
21.
CHIEN
A N D L E E
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
Time
(hours)
Figure 10. Permeation p r o f i l e s of progesterone across a stripped skin (no stratum corneum) and the effect of various skin permeation enhancers. Keys: Control device (C) and enhancer-releasing device (A-azone, OA-oleic acid, CA-capric acid, DMS-Decyl methyl sulfoxide).
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
296
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Table V : E f f e c t of Enhancers on Permeation Rate of Progesterone Across Various Skin Structures
Enhancers
N o r m a l i z e d S k i n P e r m e a t i o n Rate
1)
2
(mcg/cm /hr ± S.D.)
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Intact Control
Skin
Stripped Skin^
Delipidized Skin 2 )
0.28 (±0.05)
0.40 (±0.07)
2.36 (±0.68)
sulfoxide
8.40 5.32 2.23 2.19
(±2.64) (±1.25) (±0.86) (±0.93)
2.69 3.94 2.08 2.40
(±1.11) (±1.26) (±0.62) (±0.40)
6.46 (±1.07) 6.67 (±1.20) 4.22 (±0.30) 4.48 (±0.49)
sulfoxide
9.15 5.58 7.91 11.26
(±2.35) (±1.87) (±1.85) (±0.73)
3.30 3.64 5.20 12.50
(±0.72) (±0.79) (±0.47) (±4.21)
4.87 6.47 6.17 7.75
2
A)
3 mg/cm Azone Oleic acid Capric acid Decylmethyl
B)
2
15 mg/cm Azone Oleic acid Capric acid Decylmethyl
The s k i n p e r m e a t i o n r a t e a f t e r c o r r e c t i n g the v a r i a t i o n p e r m e a t i o n r a t e a c r o s s the r e f e r e n c e s k i n .
Stratum corneum s u r f a c e was p r e - e x t r a c t e d w i t h o r g a n i c f o r 4 hours ( R e f e r e n c e 1 4 ) .
Stratum corneum s u r f a c e was removed by 25x s t r i p p i n g 15).
(±0.53) (±1.65) (±1.04) (±3.08)
i n skin
solvent
(Reference
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21. CHIEN AND LEE
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
297
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
As the c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f enhancer i n the a d h e s i v e l a y e r i n c r e a s e s by 5 f o l d s , the s k i n p e r m e a t i o n r a t e o f p r o g e s t e r o n e a c r o s s the i n t a c t s k i n i n c r e a s e s u b s t a n t i a l l y f o r c a p r i c a c i d and d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e , but n o t f o r azone and o l e i c a c i d . The d e l i p i d ization of stratum corneum s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t s the e n h a n c i n g e f f e c t o f azone on the s k i n p e r m e a t i o n r a t e o f p r o g e s t e r o n e , but not on t h a t o f d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e . The e f f e c t o f d e l i p i d i z a t i o n on the e n h a n c i n g c a p a c i t y o f c a p r i c a c i d and o l e i c a c i d i s r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l (Table V ) . To gain a better u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the mechanisms involved in the enhancement o f s k i n permeation, the enhancement factor f o r the enhanced p e r m e a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r o n e a c r o s s v a r i o u s skin s t r u c t u r e s a t low and h i g h enhancer c o n c e n t r a t i o n s has been c a l c u l a t e d ( T a b l e s VI & V I I ) . The d a t a i n d i c a t e d t h a t as the a d h e s i v e layers contain low c o n c e n t r a t i o n of skin permeation enhancer, the permeation a c r o s s the i n t a c t s k i n i s i n c r e a s e d by 30 f o l d s f o r azone and 19 f o l d s f o r o l e i c a c i d . T h i s enhancement i s s u b s t a n t i a l l y greater than the enhancement o f the p e r m e a t i o n a c r o s s t h e delipidized skin. However, t h e a p p r o x i m a t e l y 8 - f o l d enhancement f o r b o t h c a p r i c a c i d and d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e i s n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y d i f f e r e n t from t h a t a c r o s s the d e l i p i d i z e d s k i n . For the permeation across the d e l i p i d i z e d s k i n , the e f f e c t i v e n e s s i n enhancement showed no s t a t i s t i c a l d i f f e r e n c e among the f o u r enhancers used. The r e s u l t s a p p a r e n t l y s u g g e s t e d t h a t a t low enhancer concentration, the enhancement i n the s k i n p e r m e a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r o n e by c a p r i c a c i d and d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e appears t o r e s u l t from an improved permeation across the h y d r o p h i l i c protein g e l pathway alone. However, azone and o l e i c a c i d must a l s o a c t on the f a t t y m a t r i x pathway, which y i e l d s additional enhancement. In the case o f o l e i c a c i d , the c o n t r i b u t i o n o f l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x pathway t o the o v e r a l l s k i n p e r m a t i o n enhancement o f p r o g e s t e r o n e i s about the same as t h e h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n g e l pathway. In t h e case o f azone, the f a t t y m a t r i x pathway c o n t r i b u t e s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 80% o f the t o t a l enhancement o f s k i n p e r m e a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r o n e as compared t o 20% c o n t r i b u t i o n from t h e p r o t e i n g e l pathway. As the s u r f a c e concentration o f enhancer i n the a d h e s i v e coating increased, the mechanism o f s k i n p e r m e a t i o n enhancement showed some changes as r e f l e c t e d i n the r e l a t i v e contribution o f f a t t y m a t r i x and p r o t e i n g e l pathways ( T a b l e V I I ). The b e h a v i o r f o r azone and o l e i c a c i d a t h i g h c o n c e n t r a t i o n was o b s e r v e d t o be i d e n t i c a l t o t h a t a t low c o n c e n t r a t i o n (compare t h e d a t a i n T a b l e s VI and V I I ). On the o t h e r hand, c a p r i c a c i d and d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e showed a d u a l e f f e c t on the h y d r o p h i l i c protein g e l and a l s o on the l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x . I n the case o f c a p r i c a c i d , the o v e r a l l enhancement i n the p e r m e a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r o n e was i n c r e a s e d by 354%, i n which t h e p r o t e i n g e l pathway and f a t t y m a t r i x pathway c o n t r i b u t e approximately equally ( w i t h enhancement f a c t o r o f 15.3 v s . 13.0). In the case o f d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e , the o v e r a l l enhancement was improved by 515% (40.2 v s . 7.8). The enhancement i s p r i m a r i l y the r e s u l t o f i n c r e a s e s (521%) i n the permeation enhancement across the h y d r o p h i l i c protein gel ( w i t h enhancement f a c t o r o f 31.25 a t h i g h enhancer concentration
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
298
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
Table VI : Enhancement i n Progesterone*-) Permeability Across Various Skin Structures (at low enhancer cone.)
Enhancers ^
Enhancement
2
Factor-*)
(mean
±
S.D.)
Delipidized
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
Intact
Skin
Stripped
Skin )
Skin )
4
5
Azone
30.0 ( ± 9 . 4 )
6.73 ( ± 2 . 7 7 )
2.74
(±0.45)
Oleic acid Capric acid Decylmethyl
19.0 8.0 7.8
9.85 5.20 6.00
2.83 1.79 1.90
(±0.51) (±0.13) (±0.21)
sulfoxide
"^107o d r u g
loading
in
polymer
(±4.5) (±3.1) (±3.3)
(±3.15) (±1.55) (±1.00)
matrix
2) 3 mg/cm
3)
of
2
Calculated
adhesive
polymer
by:
„ . Enhancement
„ Factor
skin
permeation
rate)
= 77: — : — — (Normalized skin
(Normalized
—: permeation
— rate;
v
, enhancer ^ control Ί
4) Stratum
corneum
surface
^Stratum
corneum
was
was
removed
pre-extracted
with
by
technique
stripping
organic
solvent
Table VII : Enhancement i n Progesterone*-) Permeability Across Various Skin Structures (at high enhancer cone.)
Enhancers )
Enhancement
2
Factor-*)
(mean
±
Delipidized Intact
Skin
32.7 ( ± 8 . 4 ) 19.9 28.3 40.2
drug
loading
in
polymer
Skin )
4
Oleic acid Capric acid Decylmethyl
"^10%
Stripped
Skin )
Azone
sulfoxide
S.D. )
(±6.7) (±6.6) (±2.6)
5
8.25 (± 1.80) 9.10 13.00 31.25
( ± 1.97) (± 1.17) (±10.5)
2.06
(±0.22)
2.74 2.61 3.28
(±0.70) (±0.44) (±1.31)
matrix
2) 15
3)
mg/cm
2
Calculated
of
adhesive
polymer
by:
_ m Enhancement
__ Factor
skin
permeation
rate)
= -7— — : — — (Normalized skin
(Normalized
: permeation
τ rate;
r
, enhancer ^ control
4) Stratum
corneum
surface
~* S t r a t u m
corneum
was
was
removed
pre-extracted
with
by
technique
stripping
organic
solvent
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
21.
CHIEN AND LEE
Transdermal Drug Delivery System
299
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
v s . 6.00 at low enhancer c o n c e n t r a t i o n ) . The a n a l y s i s a p p a r e n t l y s u g g e s t s t h a t at h i g h enhancer c o n c e n t r a t i o n , d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e exerts i t s e n h a n c i n g e f f e c t o n l y on the h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n gel pathway, whereas azone, o l e i c a c i d and c a p r i c a c i d have a d u a l a c t i o n on b o t h the h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n g e l and lipophilic fatty m a t r i x pathways. The d u a l a c t i o n on t h e s e pathways i s about the same f o r c a p r i c a c i d , a s a t u r a t e d f a t t y a c i d , and f o r o l e i c a c i d (a n o n - s a t u r a t e d f a t t y a c i d ) . On the o t h e r hand, azone a c t s p r e f e r e n t i a l l y on the l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x pathway. I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o n o t e t h a t at b o t h low and h i g h enhancer concentrations, the enhancing e f f e c t on the p e r m e a t i o n o f p r o g e s t e r one a c r o s s the v i a b l e s k i n , i . e . s t r i p p e d s k i n ( w i t h no stratum corneum), shows no s t a t i s t i c a l d i f f e r e n c e among a l l f o u r e n h a n c e r s . The enhancement f a c t o r was o b s e r v e d t o be s u b s t a n t i a l l y smaller than t h a t f o r i n t a c t and d e l i p i d i z e d s k i n ( T a b l e VI and V I I ). Conclusions By d e l i v e r i n g s k i n p e r m e a t i o n enhancer from the a d h e s i v e polymer, which c o a t s the drug-releasing surface o f the t r a n s d e r m a l drug d e l i v e r y system, the s k i n p e r m e a b i l i t y o f drugs can be s u b s t a n t i a l l y enhanced. The e x t e n t o f enhancement appears t o be dependent upon the c h e m i c a l s t r u c t u r e o f drug to be d e l i v e r e d t r a n s d e r m a l l y and the type and c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f enhancer used. Considering the s t r a t u m corneum as the composite structure o f h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n g e l and l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x , the mechanisms o f s k i n p e r m e a t i o n enhancement were i n v e s t i g a t e d u s i n g p r o g e s t e r o n e as the model p e n e t r a n t and azone, c a p r i c a c i d , o l e i c a c i d and decylmethyl sulfoxide as the model e n h a n c e r s . The results g e n e r a t e d t o date c o n c l u d e d t h a t d e c y l m e t h y l s u l f o x i d e i s an enh a n c e r which promotes the s k i n p e r m e a b i l i t y o f drugs by preferent i a l l y a f f e c t i n g the h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n g e l pathway. Azone a c t s p r i m a r i l y on the l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x pathway w i t h some e f f e c t s on the h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n g e l m a t r i x . Capric a c i d , a saturated f a t t y a c i d , promotes the p e r m e a t i o n v i a h y d r o p h i l i c p r o t e i n gel pathway a t low c o n c e n t r a t i o n and a l s o v i a l i p o p h i l i c f a t t y m a t r i x pathway at h i g h c o n c e n t r a t i o n . O l e i c a c i d , a non-saturated f a t t y a c i d , enhances the p e r m e a t i o n through b o t h p r o t e i n g e l and fatty m a t r i x pathways e q u a l l y . Acknowledgments The authors wish to express t h e i r a p p r e c i a t i o n t o Ms. M. f o r her a b l e a s s i s t a n c e i n p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h i s m a n u s c r i p t .
Boslet
Literature Cited 1)
Shaw, J. E.; Chandrasekaran, S. K.; Campbell, P.; J. Invest. Dermatol., 1976, 67, 677. 2) Shaw, J. E.; Chandrasekaran, S. K.; Drug Metab. Rev., 1978, 8, 223.
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
Downloaded by UNIV LAVAL on September 22, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 4, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0348.ch021
300
CONTROLLED-RELEASE TECHNOLOGY
3) 1982 Industrial Pharmaceutical R & D Symposium on Transdermal Controlled Release Medication, Rutgers' College of Pharmacy, Piscataway, New Jersey, January 14 & 15, 1982. Proceedings published in Drug Develop. Ind.Pharm.,1983, 9, 497-744. 4) World Congress of Clinical Pharmacology Symposium on Transder mal Delivery of Cardiovascular Drugs, Washington, D. C., August 5, 1983. Proceedings published in Am. Heart J . , 1984, 108, 195-236. 5) Good, W. R.; Powers, M. S.; Campbell, P.; Schenkel, L.; J. Cont. Release, 1985, 2, 89-97. 6) 1985 International Pharmaceutical R & D Symposium on Advances in Transdermal Controlled Drug Administration for Systemic Medications, Rutgers University, College of Pharmacy, June 20 & 21, 1985. 7) Symposium on Problems and Possibilities for Transdermal Drug Delivery, The Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California, February 2-3, 1985. 8) Chien, Y. W.; Proc. 13th International Symposium on "Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials", 1986, p. 23-24. 9) Chien, Y. W.; Lee, C. S.; United States and International patents (pending). 10) Chien, Y. W.; Lee, C. S.; Abs. Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences' 39th National Meeting and Exposition 1985, pp. 109. 11) Keshary, P. R.; Huang, Y. C.; Chien, Y. W.; Drug Develop. & Ind. Pharm., 1985, 11, 1213-1254. 12) Osol, Α.; Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th edition, Mack, Easton, Pennsylvania (1980). 13) Michaels, A. S.; Chandrasekaran, S. K.; Shaw, J. E.; AIChE Journal, 1975, 21, 985. 14) Doshi, U. B.; Chiang, C. C.; Tojo, K.; Chien, Y. W.; Proc. 13th International Symposium on "Controlled Release of Bio active Materials, 1986, p. 138. 15) Durrheim, H.; Flynn, G. L.; Higuchi, W. I.; Behl, C. R.; J. Pharm. Sci., 1980, 69, 781 RECEIVED
November 13, 1986
In Controlled-Release Technology; Lee, P., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.