(Trimethylsilyl)cyclopropyl compounds - American Chemical Society

Thirteen reflections with 2 >. 15° were centered with a programmed centering routine; cell parameters were obtained by least-squares refinement of th...
1 downloads 0 Views 449KB Size
1060

Organometallics 1984,3,1060-1063

2.3-2.6 (br m, 1.6,SiCH2),0.33-0.46 (d, 2.6,FSiCH3). A higher boiling fraction contained XIXb (0.49 9). X-ray Structure Analysis of VI. A crystal of 2,8-dibromo-5,10-dimethyl-10-fluoro-10,1l-dihydro-5H-dibenz[ b,A[1,4]azasilepine with well-developed faces was attached to a glaas fiber. Pertinent crystal and intensity data are given in Table IV. Systematic absences of h01,l odd, and OkO, k odd, uniquely determine the space group ml/c. Thirteen reflections with 20 > 1 5 O were centered with a programmed centering routine; cell parameters were obtained by least-squares refinement of these angles. The intensities of three standard reflections were measured every 97 reflections and decreased in intensity approximately 22% during the data collection. A h e a r correction for loss of intensity was applied during the data reduction. The data were reduced to F and u ( p ) by procedures similar to those described previ0us1y.~~ Standard deviations were assigned as follows: u ( n = [ U ~ , , , , ~ , ( Z )+ ~ (0.05Z)2]*/2, where ucountar= (I + PB)l12,I = net intensity, B = total background count, and K = ratio of scan time to background time. The structure was solved by an iterative application of the Z2 relationship with 129 normalized structure factors of magnitude 1.3 or greater. An E map based on the set of phases for the solution with the largest consistency index (0.98)gave the positions of the non-hydrogen atoms of the structure. Least-squares refinement of the non-hydrogen atoms with isotropic thermal parameters gave a discrepancy factors R = 0.052 and R, = 0.066; all hydrogen atoms were located in an electron density difference map (R = O.Os0) and included in the f i refinement with thermal parameters fixed at 5.0 A2. Final positional parameters with estimated standard deviations are given in Table V. Atomic scattering factors and real and imaginary anomalous dispersion (27) The synthesis of PhSi(Me)CH2C6H$ has been reported but the boiling point waa given without the pressure.28 (28) Drozdov, V. A,; Kreshkov, A. P.; Romanova, A. D. Zh.Obsch. Khim. 1970,40, 104. (29) See program references in: Corey, E. R.; Paton, W. F.; Corey, J. Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,179,241. Bellavance, P. L.; Corey, E. R.; Corey, J. Y.; Hey, G. W. Znorg. Chem. 1977,16,462.

corrections for Br and Si were taken from ref 30. The highest residual electron density in the final difference map was 0.60 e A-3 near the region of Br(1).

Acknowledgment. M.A.L. and T.E.R. acknowledge support through the National Science Foundation Undergraduate Research Participation Program (1979). A portion of this work was supported by the Graduate School of the University of Missouri-St. Louis through the Summer Fellowship Program (J.Y.C.) and the Weldon Spring Fund (E.R.C.). The generous use of the facilities of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (J.Y.C.) and of the Miles Laboratories, Inc. (V.H.T.C.) for a part of the investigation is gratefully acknowledged. Registry No. IIa, 75482-82-5; IIb, 89889-26-9;IIIa, 71445-82-4; IIIb, 89889-27-0;IIIc, 89889-28-1;IIId, 89889-29-2; VI,75499-01-3; VII, 71445-86-8;IX, 3991-61-5; Xa, 89889-30-5;Xb, 89889-31-6; XIa, 89889-32-7;XIb, 89908-12-3;XIIa, 89921-98-2;XIIb, 89889-33-8;XIII, 89889-34-9; XIV, 89889-35-0; XVa, 89889-36-1; XVb, 89889-37-2; XVI, 89889-38-3; XVIII, 89889-39-4;XIXa, 18407-40-4;XMb, 18407-42-6;XX, 27977-42-0;XXI, 89889-40-7; KCN, 151-50-8;KF, 7789-23-3; KOH, 1310-58-3;CISSiCHCICHS, 7787-82-8;Me(C1CH2CH2)SiCl2, 7787-85-1; Bu4N+F,429-41-4; Me(CICH2)SiC12, 1558-33-4;2-methylphenyl phenyl ether, 3991-61-5;2-chloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethylamine, 40062-89-3; 2,2’,4,4’-tetrabromomethyldiphenylamine,3666-95-3; (3-ChlOrOpropyl)methyldichlorosilane, 7787-93-1; diphenyl ether, 101-84-8. Supplementary Material Available: Tables of anisotropic thermal parameters for the bromine atoms and isotropic thermal parameters for non-hydrogen atoms, bond distances and angles, and structure factor amplitudes and a stereoscopic packing diagram (11 pages). Ordering information is given on any current masthead. (30) ‘International Tables of X-ray Crystallography”;Kynoch Press: Birmingham, England, 1974.

2@SiNMR Access to Stereochemistry of Molecules. 2. (Trimethyisiiy1)cyclopropyl Compounds Michellne Grignon-Dubois Laboratoire de Chimie du Silicium et de i’Etain associ6 au CNRS (LA 35), Universit6 de Bordeaux I, 33405 Taience Caex, France

Michel Laguerre ERA 890, Universl de Bordeaux 11, Facult6 de Pharmacie, 33000 Bordeaux, France

Bernard Barbe and Michel Petraud CESAMO, Universit6 de Bordeaux I, 33405 Taience Caex, France Received November 22, 1983

‘%i NMR spectra of cyclopropylsilanes were recorded by using the SPI technique. The variation of =Si-lH coupling constants with stereochemistry was studied. Our results confiim the dependence of 3J on the relative position of the MesSi group and also the unexpected zero value for 2J’(H, to the silicon). As far as chemical shifts are concerned, the additivity rule seems to exist. In a previous paper1 we were able to show for the first time that %Si-’H long-range coupling constants can be used to determine the stereochemistry of organosilicon (1) Grignon-Dubois, M.; Laguerre, M.; Barbe, B.; PBtraud, M. Organometallics 1984, 3, 359.

synthons of the bicyclo[n.l.O]alkane type A. In particular we have shown that the magnitude of the coupling constants 3J(29Si-*1H) across the cyclopropane ring is a function of the dihedral angle between the C-H and the C-Si bonds. This suggests a Karplus type relationship. In order to verify the generality of this relationship, we

0276-7333/84/2303-1060$01.50/0 0 1984 American Chemical Society

29SiNMR Access

Organometallics, Vol. 3, No. 7, 1984 1061

t o Stereochemistry of Molecules

6 29si

2.6

Table I. NMR Data for Compounds 1-9 spin systemsa zJ zJ'and 2J" Si(H9)23Jc23Jt 6.3 0

Jc

Jt

6.3

3.4

6

3.9

5.8

3.2 3.5

1.4

Si(H9)23Jc3Jt

6.3

1.4

Si(H,)3J,3Jt3Jt

6.3

0.7

Si(H9)'JC3Jt

6.3

0

5.8

2.8

4.3

unresolved

4.17

Si(H, ) 23Jc3 Jt

6.3

0

5.2

4

Si,, -67.3

0

8

5.4

Si,, 1.05 Si,, 1.3

Si23JC2Vt WH,) Si(H,)23J 3J Si(H,)22JF'3Jt'

6.3 6.3

0

6

3.5

1.5

Si(H9)2V'' J'

6.3

5.8

0

J'

trans b - S i M e 3

(3)

cis

Si,, 7.2

7.7

5.8

1

1

Si(H,) represents the silicon coupled with the nine equivalent protons of the SiMe, group, the constant being 2J.

h

------

H

6-

H' ENW -

E XO -

Si

a&2 &* 0

Figure 1. Observed and simulated spectra for compounds 1 and 9.

have studied other models of known stereochemistry. The results obtained with the cyclopropane derivatives 1-9 are presented in Table I.

3J,ndo

= 120'

2.

Si

"I

3-4 Hz

Figure 2. Variation of the %T(%i-lH) coupling constant according to the dihedral angle value. 1 9 2

1

O S "

S I E

?.
Jt,,,). treme complexity (360 theoretical peaks), the coupling This final observation in itself favors the use of Y3i constants with the protons of the cyclopropyl methyl group NMR in stereochemical studies of organosilicon synthons. being greater than 1Hz. The spectrum of 6,on the other The high sensitivity of the SPI technique and the consehand, was analyzed (cf. Figure 4); the coupling constants quent possibilities of signal assignments in proton NMR with the protons of the large ring (CH,) were found to be of SiMe3 groups can be foreseen to be very useful in less than 0.5 Hz and thus have little effect on the resulting studying the reactivity of polysilylated compounds. spectrum. In the case of 7, the presence of three OSiMe3 groups on the silicon bound to the ring increases considExperimental Section erably the values of the 3Jcoupling constants. This obSpectra were recorded on a Bruker WH-90 spectrometer (17.87 servation fits well with other reports in the literature.' MHz for 29Si)equipped with a Nicolet BNC 12 computer. It is to be noted that the coupling constants 3Jcis and All samples were 80% solutions in CsD6 (10-mm tubes). 3Jtrans have the same value in both compounds 2 and 8. Chemical shifts are given downfield (6) from Me4&as internal standard. This shows once again that the CH2SiMe3group has an For the decoupled %i spectra, the experimentswere performed effect identical with that of the CH3 group. by using the "gated decoupling pulse modulated interrupted In none of the cases examined was a long-range coupling proton band decoupling"technique8in order to cancel the negative constant across the ring, in particular 4J,observed. nuclear Overhauser effect. The followingparameters were used (3) Use of 29SiNMR in the Assignment of SiMe time pulse, 5.5 ps (a = 45O); recycle delay, 30 s. Peaks in 'HNMR. The basic idea of these experiments For the SPI spectra, the experiments were performed by using was to take advantage of the polarization transfer selecthe technique previously described in the literature.2 The foltivity in frequency for correlating lH and 29Sichemical lowing parameters were used: time for SPI K pulse, 0.1 s; time shifts. By examining the 93i-H coupling constants in 93i 29Sipulse, 11ps (a = goo);recycle delay, 5 s. In all cases, a resolution enhancement was performed by using spectra, by determining the relative position of each silicon, the RE technique? and in knowing which of the satellites is being irradiated, The theoretical spectra were calculated on a H.P. 85 microthe attribution of proton signals of the SiMe3 group of computer and were drawn on a 4662 Tektronix digital plotter. Registry No. 1, 930-40-5; 2, 79237-33-5; 3, 79237-32-4; 4, (11) Patel, D. J.; Howden, M. E. H.; Roberta, J. D. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 86994-17-4; 5, 79237-38-0; 6, 77508-36-2; 7, 90084-12-1; 8, 1963,85, 3218. 88410-28-0;9, 931-82-8. (12) Williamson, K. L.; Landford, C. A.; Nicholson, C. R. J.Am. Chem. SOC.1964, 86, 762. Seyferth, D.; Dow, A. W.; Menzel, H.; Flood, T. C.

Zbid. 1968.90, 1081. (13) Kingsbury, C. A.; Durham, D. L.; Hutton, R. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 4696. (14) Quintard, J. P.; Degueil-Cashing, M.; Barbe, B.; Pgtraud, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982,234,41.

(15) DBlCris, G.; Birot, M.; DunoguBs, J.; Barbe, B.; PBtraud, M.; Lefort. M. J. Orpanomet. Chem.. in Dress. (16) See fo; instance: Weidner: U.;Schweig, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11, 146.