Tunable Emission of Iridium(III) Complexes ... - ACS Publications

Sep 25, 2017 - containing ruthenium,28−30 rhodium,31 and platinum and palladium.32,33 ... with ligand 1a, two ligands bind in an N,N fashion while t...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Download PDF
Article Cite This: Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

pubs.acs.org/IC

Tunable Emission of Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Sulfur-Bridged Dipyridyl Ligands Christopher M. Brown, Mitchell J. Kitt, Zhen Xu, Duane Hean, Maria B. Ezhova, and Michael O. Wolf* Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, 2036 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada

Downloaded via KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIV on June 30, 2018 at 16:56:28 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: A series of six new cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes [Ir(ppy)2(N∧N)][PF6] (ppy = 2-phenylpyridine) is reported herein. Proligands bis(pyridin-2-yl)sulfane (1a), 2,2′sulfinyldipyridine (1b), 2,2′-sulfonyldipyridine (1c), bis(4-methylpyridin-2-yl)sulfane (2a), 2,2′-sulfinylbis(4-methylpyridine) (2b), and 2,2′-sulfonylbis(4-methylpyridine) (2c) were synthesized, characterized, and employed as the N∧N ancillary ligand. Changing the oxidation state of the sulfur atom serves as a switch to alter the emissive state from that of mainly 3LC character (blue-green emission) to one of 3MLCT/3LLCT character (yellow emission). Sulfide and sulfoxide complexes Ir(1a), Ir(1b), Ir(2a), and Ir(2b) show identical, vibrationally structured emission profiles with maxima at 478, 510, 548 nm in CH2Cl2 solutions resulting from a 3LC state. In contrast, sulfone complexes Ir(1c) and Ir(2c) show broad, red-shifted 3CT emission (552 and 537 nm, respectively).

■

INTRODUCTION Since the discovery of the incandescent carbon filament lamp by Thomas Edison in 1879, artificial light has had a great impact on the human race, releasing us from the light−dark cycle our ancestors were bound by. The global electricity consumption for grid-based lighting sits at roughly 19%,1 and thus there has been a recent push to increase the efficiency of modern-day lighting, as efficiency gains in this sector would greatly contribute to decreasing worldwide energy use.2 Over the past two decades solid-state lighting (SSL) has emerged as the source for higher efficiency light generation with reduced heat output.3 Widely used SSL is based on inorganic lightemitting diodes (LEDs), with organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs)4,5 and, more recently, light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs)6,7 showing promise for the future. Iridium(III) complexes are known for their high efficiency and wide scope of tunability in both OLEDs8−11 and LECs,12−15 yet there remains a lack of wide band gap blue emitters for both these purposes.11 Blue emission typically requires the addition of fluorine substituents on the cyclometalated C∧N ligands; however, under bias these groups are often unstable, leading to degradation and lower device longevity.16 In [Ir(C∧N)2(N∧N)]+ complexes the HOMO contains contributions from the Ir(III) dπ orbitals and the phenyl π orbitals of the C∧N cyclometalating ligand, and the LUMO is usually localized on the N∧N ancillary ligands.15 This localized nature leads to effective color tuning of the HOMO− LUMO gap. Adding electron-donating substituents to the N∧N ligand destabilizes the LUMO and blue-shifts the emission. Additionally, altering the C∧N ligands can help stabilize the HOMO to increase the HOMO−LUMO gap even further. © 2017 American Chemical Society

We have previously reported that the degree of sulfur oxidation in sulfur-bridged conjugated organic molecules has significant effects on the electronic properties of these systems.17,18 It has been shown that by increasing the oxidation state of a bridging sulfur in a thiophene-based system from sulfide (S) to sulfoxide (SO) and to sulfone (SO2) it is possible to influence intramolecular charge transfer and emission intensity. Here, we show that the emission color of an Ir(III) complex can be tuned through altering the oxidation state at the sulfur of the N∧N ancillary ligands. This approach is advantageous, as only one parent ligand is needed, with simple oxidation yielding the other two variants, simplifying synthesis considerably.

■

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Ligand Synthesis and Characterization. The symmetrical sulfide-bridged proligands 1a and 2a were prepared via a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction using thiourea,19 starting with either 2-bromopyridine or 2-chloro4-methylpyridine (Scheme 1). The desired sulfoxide and sulfone compounds were then obtained by oxidation of the corresponding diaryl sulfides. Oxidation to the sulfoxide products was performed using one of two different pathways:20,21 compound 1b was prepared through the addition of 30% H2O2 to 1a dissolved in glacial acetic acid, while 2b was formed by the addition of m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA) to 2a at 0 °C. Sulfone proligands 1c and 2c were synthesized through oxidation of the appropriate diaryl sulfide Received: September 25, 2017 Published: November 29, 2017 15110

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry Scheme 1. Synthesis of Iridium(III) Complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c)

with 30% H2O2 using a niobium carbide (NbC) catalyst.22 Moderate to high yields of the desired products were obtained in all synthetic steps, and the six proligands were characterized using NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and infrared spectroscopy. 1H and 13C NMR signals were assigned using COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments. Synthesis and Characterization of [Ir(ppy)2(N∧N)][PF6] Complexes. The [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 dimer was prepared by a microwave-assisted reaction of IrCl3·xH2O with 2-phenylpyridine (ppy).23 The dimer was isolated as a yellow solid in high yield, requiring no further purification. Complexes [Ir(ppy)2(N∧N)][PF6] (N∧N = 1a−c, 2a−c) were synthesized via an intermediate solvento complex, formed by the reaction of the iridium dimer with AgPF6 in MeOH, followed by the addition of the appropriate N∧N ligand, yielding the desired compounds as yellow powders in all cases (Scheme 1).24 The HR-ESI mass spectra show a product peak corresponding to [M − PF6]+ exhibiting a characteristic iridium isotope pattern. 1 H and 13C NMR spectra were assigned using COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments. The sulfoxide component of complexes Ir(1b) and Ir(2b) causes the two cyclometalating ligands, and thus the two pyridyl rings of the ancillary ligand, to become inequivalent. This is due to the proximity of the sulfoxide oxygen to one of the ppy ligands, changing its environment relative to the other ppy. The two different phenylpyridine ligands were distinguished through NOESY cross peaks. The room-temperature NMR spectra of all six complexes have clear, defined peaks with no evidence for exchange or dissociation occurring in CD2Cl2; however in CD3CN, a coordinating NMR solvent, it was observed in complexes Ir(1b,c) and Ir(2b,c) that the ancillary ligand is

replaced by solvent, resulting in [Ir(ppy)2(CD3CN)2][PF6]. It is known that, upon an increase in the oxidation state at the sulfur from sulfide to sulfoxide to sulfone, the electronwithdrawing strength of the substituent increases.25 It is likely that the increased electron-withdrawing character reduces the σ-donating ability of the pyridyl moieties. This may also explain the lower isolated yields found in the complexes with ligands of higher sulfur oxidation state. Complexes Ir(1b) and Ir(2b) both have the possibility of N∧N coordination through both pyridyl moieties and N∧O binding through one pyridyl group and the oxygen of the sulfoxide. NMR experiments show that in both cases the ancillary ligand is bound N∧N, as there are no NOE cross peaks observed between protons 4 and 34, the presence of which would indicate free rotation of a pendant pyridyl ring (Figures S21 and S38 in the Supporting Information). Crystal Structure. Single crystals of Ir(1a) were grown by vapor diffusion with CH2Cl2 and hexanes. Complex Ir(1a) crystallizes in the space group P1̅ with the asymmetric unit containing two complex molecules and their respective counteranions (Figure 1). The hexane solvent molecule contained within the structure is disordered and has been removed using the SQUEEZE method.26 As shown in Figure 1, coordination occurs through the pyridyl nitrogen atoms of the N∧N ligand (1a), each adopting a trans configuration with respect to the corresponding coordinating C atom of the cyclometalating phenyl ring. Bond angles and lengths discussed in this section are with respect to the Λ conformation of Ir(1a). The complex exists in an octahedral geometry with both ppy cyclometalating ligands showing deviation from planarity between the rings (angles between ring planes are 5.8 and 15111

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

(where dps is 1a), a homoleptic Ru(II) complex chelated with ligand 1a, two ligands bind in an N,N fashion while the third binds in an N,S fashion, resulting in a pendant pyridyl ring. This is not observed in Ir(1a), likely due to the cyclometaling ppy ligands having less bulk than 1a. Photophysical Properties. The absorption spectra of sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone pro-ligands 1a−c and 2a−c are shown in Figure 2a. Features at energies higher than 325 nm in all proligands correspond to π* ← π transitions. The spectra of the sulfide compounds 1a and 2a contain a weak, low-energy feature at 375 nm. Absorption spectra of complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c) were recorded in CH2Cl2 with a solution concentration of ∼2 × 10−5 M (Figure 2b). The spectra are similar for all complexes, showing intense absorption bands lying in the UV region with maxima in the range 250−270 nm, which are assigned to spin-allowed π* ← π transitions of the ligands. Lower intensity bands are observed between 350 and 450 nm, which correspond to spin-allowed metal to ligand (1MLCT) and ligand to ligand (1LLCT) transitions. Weaker intensity tails above 450 nm comprise spin-forbidden 3MLCT, 3 LLCT, and ligand-centered (3LC) transitions.15 The normalized photoluminescence spectra of complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c) were recorded in CH2Cl2 solution after deaerating with Ar for 25 min and are shown in Figure 2c. Emission maxima are summarized in Table 1. Emission of Ir(III) complexes with the general structure [Ir(C∧N)2(N∧N)][PF6] occurs from the lowest-lying triplet state (T1), which due to the heavy-atom effect typically contains a mixture of contributions from 3MLCT, 3LLCT, and 3 LC states.34 In general, when the contribution is higher in charge-transfer character, the emission profile becomes broader and less structured. Sulfide and sulfoxide complexes (Ir(1a,b) and Ir(2a,b), respectively) show identical, fine-structured luminescence

Figure 1. Crystal structure of Ir(1a). Ellipsoids are plotted at the 50% probability level, and H atoms and hexane molecules are removed for clarity.

13.15°, respectively). The tetrahedral geometry about the sulfur atom results in nonplanarity of the bis(pyridin-2-yl)sulfane (DPS) ligand pyridine rings with an angle of 40.3° between each ring plane and results in a N1−Ir−N2 bite angle of 89.99°. This allows the complex to adopt a more perfect octahedron in comparison to [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6],27 which has a smaller bite angle for the bpy ligand of 76.20°. The Ir−N bond lengths are comparable between the two species, with Ir(1a) having slightly longer bond lengths (Ir−N1, Ir−N2 = 2.198, 2.173 Å, respectively) in comparison to [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6] (Ir−N1, Ir−N2 = 2.129, 2.136 Å, respectively), indicating a slight reduction in σ-donation from the ancillary ligand in Ir(1a). Complexes containing ligand 1a have previously been synthesized, with crystal structures reported for species containing ruthenium,28−30 rhodium,31 and platinum and palladium.32,33 In the case of [Ru(dps)2(N,S-dps)][PF6]30

Figure 2. (a) Absorption spectra of proligands 1a−c and 2a−c. (b) Absorption spectra of complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c). (c) Photoluminescence spectra of complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c) (λex 390 nm). (d) TCSPC emission lifetimes of complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c) (λex 373 nm). All spectra were recorded in ∼2 × 10−5 M CH2Cl2 solutions. Except for (a), all samples were sparged with Ar for 25 min. 15112

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

Ir(2a), consistent with an emission attributed to MLCT/3LLCT states rather than from a 3LC state.40−42 This is further supported as a lower 3LC character is indicated by a higher kr.15,42 Sulfoxide complexes Ir(1b) and Ir(2b) both display a triexponential decay with the major component of each residing in the tens of nanoseconds range (expanded scale shown in Figure S53 in the Supporting Information). The presence of the sulfoxide group breaks the symmetry in the complex (Figures S18−S23 and S35−S40 in the Supporting Information), and it is possible that this break in symmetry causes the multiexponential emission lifetimes. Another possibility is that multiple conformers are present in solution (each with a different emission decay); however, variable-temperature NMR experiments show no peak broadening or additional signals to −75 °C (Figure S47 in the Supporting Information). Therefore, if multiple conformers are present, these would have to still be in rapid equilibrium at this temperature. The shortest decay component could be due to a low concentration fluorescent impurity in the sample, which is not observed by NMR spectroscopy. Thus, the origin of the triexponential lifetime decay for complexes Ir(1b) and Ir(2b) remains unclear at this time. Electrochemical Properties. Cyclic voltammetric data for [Ir(C∧N)(N∧N)]+ (N∧N = 1a−c, 2a−c) are summarized in Table 2, and cyclic voltammograms are found in Figures S54

Table 1. Photophysical Data of Complexes Ir(1a−c) and Ir(2a−c) in CH2Cl2 Solution complex

λem (nm)a

Ir(1a)

478, 510, 548 478, 510, 548

Ir(1b)

Ir(1c) Ir(2a) Ir(2b)

Ir(2c)

552 478, 510, 548 478, 510, 548 537

τem (μs)b 0.360

PLQY (%)a

kr (106 s−1)

knr (106 s−1)

3.7

0.10

2.7 c

3

41.4c

0.163 (3.6%), 0.024 (93.2%), 0.001 (3.2%) 0.231 0.828

0.6

0.25

3.3 8.2

0.14 0.10

4.2 1.1

0.898 (13.2%), 0.060 (83.9%), 0.044 (2.9%) 0.065

2.6

0.43c

16.2c

4.3

0.66

14.7

λex 370 nm. bλex 373 nm. ckr and knr for sulfoxide complexes calculated using the major lifetime component. a

profiles with maxima at 478, 510, and 548 nm, indicating a large 3 LC character of the emissive state. This emission is independent of excitation wavelength. Solvents with higher polarity can often stabilize charge transfer states, resulting in broadened, red-shifted emission; hence photoluminescence spectra of Ir(1a) were obtained in solvents of increasing polarity (CH2Cl2, MeOH, and CH3CN) to probe the nature of the emission (Figure S52 in the Supporting Information). No change in emission profile was observed in these experiments, with the fine structure staying intact, supporting the assignment of an emitting 3LC state of π* ← π character, localized on the ppy cyclometalating ligands. This shape also bears a distinct resemblance to the emission band of [Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)],35 further suggesting a dominant 3LC contribution to the emissive triplet state. In contrast, sulfone complexes Ir(1c) and Ir(2c) show broad, featureless photoluminescence spectra indicative of 3MLCT character with both species exhibiting bathochromically shifted emission bands in comparison to Ir(1a,b) and Ir(2a,b). A small blue shift of 15 nm is observed on going from Ir(1c) (552 nm) to Ir(2c) (537 nm), which is attributed to the methyl substituents in the 4- and 4′-positions of the ancillary ligand in Ir(2c), resulting in destabilization of the LUMO due to the higher electron density on the N∧N ligand.36 Photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY, Table 1) in deaerated CH2Cl2 are in the range ∼1−8%, slightly lower than that of [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6] in deaerated CH3CN (14%).37 These low values are attributed to the increased ligand flexibility of the ancillary ligands about the sulfur atom. The excited state energy can presumably be dissipated more readily through ligand motion in comparison to more rigid ancillary ligands such as 2,2′-bipyridine. The low PLQYs for sulfoxidecontaining complexes Ir(1b) and Ir(2b) (450 nm using a low-pass filter. Data were fitted using the DAS6 Data Analysis software package. All measurements were recorded at room temperature. Sample solutions were maintained under a blanket of Ar for the duration of the measurements in 1 cm2 quartz cells (Starna Cells) fitted with a rubber septum. X-ray Crystallography. Single-crystal X-ray data were collected using a Bruker APEX DUO diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 90 K. Raw frame data were processed using APEX2.44 The program SAINT+, version 6.02,45 was used to reduce the data, and the program SADABS was used to make corrections to the empirical absorptions. Space group assignments were made using XPREP45 on all compounds. In all cases, the structures were solved in the WinGX Suite46 of programs by direct 15115

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

stirred for 12 h at room temperature. AgCl was removed by filtration over Celite, and then the filtrate was dried under reduced pressure. The resulting solid was redissolved in EtOH (20 mL) and 1b (0.042 g, 0.207 mmol, 2.0 equiv) added, following which the solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. EtOH was removed in vacuo, the crude solid purified using column chromatography (silica, 99/1 CH2Cl2/ MeOH), and the eluted product precipitated with hexanes, giving a yellow crystalline solid (0.037 g, yield 42%). 1H NMR (850 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.83 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.5, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (ddd, J = 5.6, 1.6, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (ddd, J = 8.0, 1.5, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (ddd, J = 8.0, 1.5, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 8.22−8.20 (m, 2H), 7.96 (ddd, J = 8.3, 7.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.92−7.85 (m, 3H), 7.68 (ddd, J = 5.5, 1.6, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (ddt, J = 7.7, 1.4, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (ddd, J = 7.5, 5.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27−7.22 (m, 2H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 7.8, 7.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (ddd, J = 7.7, 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.03−6.98 (m, 2H), 6.93 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.5, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (ddd, J = 7.8, 7.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (ddd, J = 7.8, 1.2, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (ddd, J = 7.6, 1.2, 0.5 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 169.10, 167.69, 164.38, 161.96, 154.60, 154.35, 152.87, 148.75, 145.52, 145.09, 144.81, 144.11, 141.55, 141.36, 139.90, 139.73, 132.59, 131.73, 131.68, 131.06, 128.93, 128.51, 126.23, 125.03, 124.51, 124.23, 124.17, 123.76, 123.33, 123.24, 121.58, 120.56. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C32H24IrN4OS, 705.1300; found, 705.1277 [M−PF6]+. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(1c)][PF6] (Ir(1c)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.090 g, 0.084 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and AgPF6 (0.104 g, 0.415 mmol, 4.0 equiv) were suspended in MeOH (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h, during which AgCl formed as a precipitate. This was removed by filtration over Celite, followed by evaporation of the solvent. The resulting solid was redissolved in EtOH (20 mL), and 1c (0.037 g, 0.168 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature, following which the EtOH was removed under reduced pressure and the crude solid dissolved in CH2Cl2. This mixture was passed over Celite three times and the product precipitated with hexanes, yielding a yellow powder (0.020 g, yield 28%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.72 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 8.36−8.31 (m, 2H), 8.29−8.24 (m, 2H), 7.99−7.94 (m, 2H), 7.87 (td, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.75−7.69 (m, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.13−7.05 (m, 4H), 6.94 (td, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 6.13 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 167.11, 155.41, 155.05, 152.09, 144.98, 142.52, 141.89, 139.51, 132.22, 131.71, 131.25, 127.54, 125.59, 124.52, 123.62, 120.36. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C32H24IrN4O2S, 721.1249; found, 721.1232 [M − PF6]+. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(2a)][PF6] (Ir(2a)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.107 g, 0.099 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and AgPF6 (0.101 g, 0.400 mmol, 4.0 equiv) were suspended in MeOH (20 mL) and stirred for 12 h at room temperature. Precipitated AgCl was removed by filtration over Celite, the dried filtrate redissolved in EtOH (20 mL), and 2a (0.050 g, 0.199 mmol, 2.0 equiv) added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The filtrate was purified using column chromatography (silica, 100% CH3 CN, followed by 97/3/1 CH3CN/H2O/KNO3 (sat.)) to yield a yellow crystalline solid (0.091 g, yield 65%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.13 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.5, 0.7 Hz, 2H), 8.00−7.95 (m, 2H), 7.92−7.86 (m, 4H), 7.72 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.9, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (ddd, J = 5.8, 2.0, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 6.88 (td, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 6.20 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (s, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 168.35, 153.86, 153.48, 152.81, 151.59, 148.17, 144.58, 139.14, 132.21, 131.00, 130.09, 127.32, 125.41, 123.50, 123.12, 120.53, 21.21. HR-ESI MS: m/ z calcd for C34H28IrN4S, 717.1664; found, 717.1727 [M−PF6]+. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(2b)][PF6] (Ir(2b)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.076 g, 0.073 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was suspended in MeOH (25 mL) along with AgPF6 (0.056 g, 0.220 mmol, 3.0 equiv) and stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The reaction mixture was passed over Celite to remove precipitated AgCl, the filtrate dried in vacuo, and the solid redissolved in EtOH. Following this, 2b (0.034 g, 0.146 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added to the solution, which was stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The product precipitated out of solution and was filtered, giving a yellow powder that required no further purification (0.041 g, 61%). 1H NMR (850 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.82 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.5, 0.8 Hz,

calcd for C10H8N2O2S, 220.0306; found, 220.0307 [M]+. IR (neat): ν̃(σ(SO2)) 1170 and 1309 cm−1. Synthesis of Bis(4-methylpyridin-2-yl)sulfane (2a). 2-Chloro4-(methyl)pyridine (5.71 g, 44.8 mmol, 2.0 equiv) and thiourea (1.618 g, 23.3 mmol, 0.95 equiv) were dissolved in EtOH (500 mL) under a N2 atmosphere and heated to reflux for 150 h. After the mixture was cooled to room temperature, the EtOH was removed and the crude product dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL), washed using water (3 × 10 mL) and brine (10 mL), dried with MgSO4, and filtered. Purification was performed by column chromatography (silica, 100% CH2Cl2 then 9/1 CH2Cl2/MeOH), and after removal of the solvents in vacuo a yellow oil was isolated (2.32 g, yield 48%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.37−8.30 (m, 2H), 7.23 (dt, J = 1.6, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (ddd, J = 5.1, 1.6, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 156.62, 149.71, 148.51, 126.45, 122.87, 20.69. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C12H13N2S, 217.0799; found, 217.0797 [M + H]+. Synthesis of 2,2′-Sulfinylbis(4-methylpyridine) (2b). 2a (0.300 g, 1.39 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (7 mL) at 0 °C. A solution of m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA; 0.264 g, 1.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and added dropwise over 30 min to the diaryl sulfide. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 6 h and then extracted with 10% NaOH (2 × 20 mL), 5% HCl (2 × 20 mL), and 10% NaHCO3 (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure, yielding a white solid that required no further purification (0.249 g, 77%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.41 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (dt, J = 1.8, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 7.18−7.11 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 164.85, 150.57, 150.08, 126.58, 120.69, 21.60. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C12H12N2ONaS, 255.0568; found, 255.0575 [M + Na]+. IR (neat): ν̃(σ(SO)) 1045 cm−1. Synthesis of 2,2′-Sulfonylbis(4-methylpyridine) (2c). 2a (0.590 g, 0.273 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in 25 mL of EtOH, in which NbC (0.077 g, 0.683 mmol, 0.25 equiv) was suspended and 30% H2O2 (4.1 mL, 40.9 mmol, 5.0 equiv) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was heated to 60 °C and stirred for 16 h. After the mixture was cooled to room temperature, saturated Na2S2O3 solution (80 mL) was added, the product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 25 mL), and the organics were combined, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. After the solvent was removed in vacuo, a white powder was isolated that required no further purification (0.566 g, yield 83%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.45 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (s, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 2.49 (s, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 157.47, 150.76, 150.51, 128.62, 124.96, 21.55. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C12H13N2O2S: 249.0698; found, 249.0706 [M + H]+. IR (neat): ν̃(σ(SO2)) 1157 and 1313 cm−1. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(1a)][PF6] (Ir(1a)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.111 g, 0.104 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and AgPF6 (0.104 g, 0.415 mmol, 4.0 equiv) were placed in a round-bottomed flask and suspended in MeOH (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature, during which AgCl formed as a gray precipitate. The reaction mixture was passed over Celite to remove the AgCl, the filtrate dried under reduced pressure, and the solid redissolved in EtOH. To this was added 1a (0.039 g, 0.208 mmol, 2.0 equiv), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature, following which the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude solid was purified using column chromatography (silica, 99/1 CH2Cl2/MeOH), giving a yellow crystalline powder (0.080 g, yield 56%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.17 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.6, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 8.13 (ddd, J = 5.7, 1.8, 0.7 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 8.01−7.89 (m, 4H), 7.88 (td, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.23−7.14 (m, 4H), 7.07 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (td, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 6.24 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.1 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 168.12, 154.34, 154.20, 151.49, 147.48, 144.39, 139.95, 139.14, 132.03, 130.91, 129.57, 126.26, 125.32, 123.51, 123.09, 120.50. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C32H24IrN4S, 689.1351; found, 689.1316 [M − PF6]+. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(1b)][PF6] (Ir(1b)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.111g, 0.104 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and AgPF6 (0.110 g, 0.435 mmol, 4.0 equiv) were suspended in MeOH (20 mL), and the reaction mixture was 15116

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

for financial support and the Laboratory for Advanced Spectroscopy and Imaging Research (LASIR) for facilities access.

1H), 8.37 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 8.18−8.15 (m, 1H), 8.14 (dq, J = 2.0, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (dt, J = 2.0, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (ddd, J = 8.3, 7.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.89−7.84 (m, 3H), 7.55 (ddt, J = 7.7, 1.3, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 7.48−7.46 (m, 1H), 7.29 (ddt, J = 5.8, 2.0, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.9, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (ddd, J = 7.9, 7.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05−7.03 (m, 1H), 7.02−7.00 (m, 2H), 6.98−6.96 (m, 2H), 6.89 (ddd, J = 7.8, 7.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (ddd, J = 7.8, 1.2, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (ddd, J = 7.6, 1.2, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (d, J = 0.7 Hz, 3H), 2.47 (d, J = 0.7 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 169.09, 167.67, 163.55, 161.13, 154.86, 154.61, 154.24, 153.78, 152.06, 148.82, 146.07, 145.34, 145.07, 144.16, 139.72, 139.52, 132.61, 131.67, 131.54, 130.90, 129.65, 129.14, 126.11, 124.90, 124.25, 124.11, 123.91, 123.57, 123.19, 121.38, 120.39, 21.97. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C34H28IrN4OS, 733.1613; found, 733.1542 [M − PF6]+. Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(2c)][PF6] (Ir(2c)). [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.092 g, 0.086 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and AgPF6 (0.090 g, 0.356 mmol, 4.1 equiv) were suspended in MeOH (15 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature. AgCl precipitated out of the solution, the mixture was filtered over Celite, and the filtrate was dried under reduced pressure. The resulting solid was redissolved in EtOH (20 mL) and 2c (0.043 g, 0.172 mmol, 2.0 equiv) added, following which the solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The EtOH was then removed in vacuo and the crude mixture redissolved in CH2Cl2, following which the solution was filtered over Celite two times to remove a brown impurity. The resulting product was then precipitated out of solution with hexanes, yielding a yellow solid (0.025 g, yield 35%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.51 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.97−7.94 (m, 2H), 7.89−7.83 (m, 2H), 7.70 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (ddd, J = 5.7, 2.1, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 7.11−7.04 (m, 4H), 6.92 (td, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 6.13 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 2.53 (s, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 167.16, 155.22, 154.65, 154.41, 152.09, 145.01, 143.14, 139.36, 132.21, 132.12, 131.14, 128.11, 125.49, 124.30, 123.53, 120.24, 21.91. HR-ESI MS: m/z calcd for C34H28IrN4O2S, 749.1562; found, 749.1605 [M − PF6]+.

■

■

(1) International Energy Agency. Light’s Labour’s Lost; Energy Efficiency Policy Profiles; OECD Publishing: Paris, 2006. (2) Armaroli, N.; Balzani, V. Towards an Electricity-Powered World. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3193−3222. (3) Humphreys, C. J. Solid-State Lighting. MRS Bull. 2008, 33, 459− 470. (4) Tang, C. W.; VanSlyke, S. A. Organic Electroluminescent Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913−915. (5) Burroughes, J. H.; Bradley, D.; Brown, A. R.; Marks, R. N. LightEmitting Diodes Based on Conjugated Polymers. Nature 1990, 348, 352−352. (6) Pei, Q.; Yu, G.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Heeger, A. J. Polymer LightEmitting Electrochemical Cells. Science 1995, 269, 1086−1088. (7) Flamigni, L.; Barbieri, A.; Sabatini, C.; Ventura, B.; Barigelletti, F. Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds: Iridium. In Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds II; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; pp 143−203. (8) Chi, Y.; Chou, P.-T. Transition-Metal Phosphors with Cyclometalating Ligands: Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 638−655. (9) Chou, P.-T.; Chi, Y.; Chung, M.-W.; Lin, C.-C. Harvesting Luminescence via Harnessing the Photophysical Properties of Transition Metal Complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2653− 2665. (10) Powell, B. J. Theories of Phosphorescence in Organo-Transition Metal Complexes − From Relativistic Effects to Simple Models and Design Principles for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 295, 46−79. (11) Ma, D.; Tsuboi, T.; Qiu, Y.; Duan, L. Recent Progress in Ionic Iridium(III) Complexes for Organic Electronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1603253. (12) Maness, K. M.; Terrill, R. H.; Meyer, T. J.; Murray, R. W.; Wightman, R. M. Solid-State Diode-Like Chemiluminescence Based on Serial, Immobilized Concentration Gradients in Mixed-Valent Poly[Ru(vbpy)3](PF6)2 Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10609− 10616. (13) Slinker, J. D.; Rivnay, J.; Moskowitz, J. S.; Parker, J. B.; Bernhard, S.; Abruña, H. D.; Malliaras, G. G. Electroluminescent Devices From Ionic Transition Metal Complexes. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 2976−2988. (14) Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; Pei, Q. Polymer Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells for High-Efficiency Low-Voltage Electroluminescent Devices. J. Disp. Technol. 2007, 3, 211−224. (15) Costa, R. D.; Ortí, E.; Bolink, H. J.; Monti, F.; Accorsi, G.; Armaroli, N. Luminescent Ionic Transition-Metal Complexes for Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8178−8211. (16) Tordera, D.; Serrano-Pérez, J. J.; Pertegás, A.; Ortí, E.; Bolink, H. J.; Baranoff, E.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Frey, J. Correlating the Lifetime and Fluorine Content of Iridium(III) Emitters in Green Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3391− 3397. (17) Christensen, P. R.; Nagle, J. K.; Bhatti, A.; Wolf, M. O. Enhanced Photoluminescence of Sulfur-Bridged Organic Chromophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8109−8112. (18) Cruz, C. D.; Christensen, P. R.; Chronister, E. L.; Casanova, D.; Wolf, M. O.; Bardeen, C. J. Sulfur-Bridged Terthiophene Dimers: How Sulfur Oxidation State Controls Interchromophore Electronic Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 12552−12564. (19) Manivel, P.; Prabakaran, K.; Krishnakumar, V.; Nawaz Khan, F.R.; Maiyalagan, T. Thiourea-Mediated Regioselective Synthesis of Symmetrical and Unsymmetrical Diversified Thioethers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7866−7870.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439. Characterization data (NMR, IR, and mass spectrometry) and absorption, excitation, and emission spectra (PDF) Accession Codes

CCDC 1575947 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_ [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

■

REFERENCES

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail for M.O.W.: [email protected]. ORCID

Michael O. Wolf: 0000-0003-3076-790X Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Rebecca Sherbo for assistance and helpful discussions with the electrochemical measurements and Mark Okon for access to the 850 MHz NMR spectrometer. We acknowledge the NSERC and the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies 15117

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118

Article

Inorganic Chemistry (20) Golchoubian, H.; Hosseinpoor, F. Effective Oxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides with Hydrogen Peroxide Under TransitionMetal-Free Conditions. Molecules 2007, 12, 304−311. (21) Chun, J.-H.; Morse, C. L.; Chin, F. T.; Pike, V. W. No-CarrierAdded [18F] Fluoroarenes From the Radiofluorination of Diaryl Sulfoxides. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2151−2153. (22) Kirihara, M.; Itou, A.; Noguchi, T.; Yamamoto, J. Tantalum Carbide or Niobium Carbide Catalyzed Oxidation of Sulfides with Hydrogen Peroxide: Highly Efficient and Chemoselective Syntheses of Sulfoxides and Sulfones. Synlett 2010, 2010, 1557−1561. (23) Davies, D. L.; Lowe, M. P.; Ryder, K. S.; Singh, K.; Singh, S. Tuning Emission Wavelength and Redox Properties Through Position of the Substituent in Iridium(III) Cyclometallated Complexes. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 1028−1030. (24) Ertl, C. D.; Momblona, C.; Pertegás, A.; Junquera-Hernández, J. M.; La-Placa, M.-G.; Prescimone, A.; Ortí, E.; Housecroft, C. E.; Constable, E. C.; Bolink, H. J. Highly Stable Red-Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3237−3248. (25) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. A Survey of Hammett Substituent Constants and Resonance and Field Parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165−195. (26) Spek, A. L. PLATON SQUEEZE: A Tool for the Calculation of the Disordered Solvent Contribution to the Calculated Structure Factors. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 9−18. (27) Costa, R. D.; Ortí, E.; Bolink, H. J.; Graber, S.; Schaffner, S.; Neuburger, M.; Housecroft, C. E.; Constable, E. C. Archetype Cationic Iridium Complexes and Their Use in Solid-State Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3456−3463. (28) Bruno, G.; Nicol, F.; Lo Schiavo, S.; Sinicropi, M. S.; Tresoldi, G. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Properties of Di-2-Pyridyl Sulfide (dps) Compounds. Crystal Structure of [Ru(dps)2Cl2]. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1995, 17−24. (29) Tresoldi, G.; Lo Schiavo, S.; Piraino, P.; Zanello, P. Synthesis of the New Binucleating Compound Pyrazin-2-yl 2-Pyridyl Sulfide for Stepwise or Direct Approach to Asymmetric Binuclear Ruthenium(II) Complexes. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 885−892. (30) Scopelliti, R.; Bruno, G.; Donato, C.; Tresoldi, G. Incorporation of Non-Planar Chelating Ligands in the Coordination Sphere of Ruthenium(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 313, 43−55. (31) Tresoldi, G.; Piraino, P.; Rotondo, E.; Faraone, F. Synthesis and Dynamic Behaviour of Rhodium(I) Complexes Containing the Di-2Pyridyl Sulphide Ligand. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1991, 425−430. (32) Tresoldi, G.; Rotondo, E.; Piraino, P.; Lanfranchi, M.; Tiripicchio, A. Reactions of Di-2-Pyridyl Sulfide with the Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Diene or Methoxydiene Complexes. Dynamic Behaviour of the Cationic Compounds. Crystal Structure of Pd(Di2-Pyridyl Sulfide)Cl2. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1992, 194, 233−241. (33) Nicolò, F.; Bruno, G.; Tresoldi, G. Bis[Bis(2-Pyridyl-N) Sulfide]Palladium(II) Bis(Tetrafluoroborate). Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1996, 52, 2188−2191. (34) Geiß, B.; Lambert, C. A Small Cationic Donor−Acceptor Iridium Complex with a Long-Lived Charge-Separated State. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1670−1672. (35) Finkenzeller, W. J.; Stoessel, P.; Kulikova, M.; Yersin, H. Emission Properties of Ir(ppy)3 and Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl): Compounds with Different Transition Types. Proc. SPIE 2003, 5214, 356−367. (36) Skórka, Ł.; Filapek, M.; Zur, L.; Małecki, J. G. Highly Phosphorescent Cyclometalated Iridium (III) Complexes for Optoelectronic Applications: Fine Tuning of the Emission Wavelength Through Ancillary Ligands. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 7284−7294. (37) Costa, R. D.; Ortí, E.; Tordera, D.; Pertegás, A.; Bolink, H. J.; Graber, S.; Housecroft, C. E.; Sachno, L.; Neuburger, M.; Constable, E. C. Stable and Efficient Solid-State Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells Based on a Series of Hydrophobic Iridium Complexes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 282−290. (38) Takizawa, S.-Y.; Shimada, K.; Sato, Y.; Murata, S. Controlling the Excited State and Photosensitizing Property of a 2-(2-Pyridyl)Benzo[b]Thiophene-Based Cationic Iridium Complex Through Simple Chemical Modification. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 2983−2995.

(39) Takizawa, S.-Y.; Ikuta, N.; Zeng, F.; Komaru, S.; Sebata, S.; Murata, S. Impact of Substituents on Excited-State and Photosensitizing Properties in Cationic Iridium(III) Complexes with Ligands of Coumarin 6. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 8723−8735. (40) Sprouse, S.; King, K. A.; Spellane, P. J. Photophysical Effects of Metal-Carbon s Bonds in Ortho-Metalated Complexes of Iridium (III) and Rhodium (III). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6647−6653. (41) Tamayo, A. B.; Garon, S.; Sajoto, T.; Djurovich, P. I.; Tsyba, I. M.; Bau, R.; Thompson, M. E. Cationic Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Diimine Complexes and Their Use in Efficient Blue, Green, and Red Electroluminescent Devices. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 8723−8732. (42) He, L.; Duan, L.; Qiao, J.; Wang, R.; Wei, P.; Wang, L.; Qiu, Y. Blue-Emitting Cationic Iridium Complexes with 2-(1H-Pyrazol-1yl)Pyridine as the Ancillary Ligand for Efficient Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 2123−2131. (43) Prier, C. K.; Rankic, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes: Applications in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322−5363. (44) APEX2, version 2, User Manual, M86-E01078; Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems: Madison, WI, 2006. (45) SAINT+, version 6.02;Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems, Madison, WI, 1999. (46) Farrugia, L. J. WinGX Suite for Small-Molecule Single-Crystal Crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837−838. (47) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97 Programs for Crystal Solution; University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997. (48) Farrugia, L. J. IUCr. WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: an Update. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2012, 45, 849−854. (49) Spek, A. L. Research Papers Single-Crystal Structure Validation with the Program Veyx. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 1−7. (50) Becke, A. D. Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. the Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648−5652. (51) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula Into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1988, 37, 785−789. (52) Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. Ab initio effective Core Potentials for Molecular Calculations. Potentials for K to Au Including the Outermost Core Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299−310. (53) Miertuš, S.; Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. Electrostatic Interaction of a Solute with a Continuum. A Direct Utilization of Ab Initio Molecular Potentials for the Prevision of Solvent Effects. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55, 117−129. (54) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999−3094. (55) Casida, M. E.; Jamorski, C.; Casida, K. C.; Salahub, D. R. Molecular Excitation Energies to High-Lying Bound States From Time-Dependent Density-Functional Response Theory: Characterization and Correction of the Time-Dependent Local Density Approximation Ionization Threshold. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4439−4449. (56) Jamorski, C.; Casida, M. E.; Salahub, D. R. Dynamic Polarizabilities and Excitation Spectra From a Molecular Implementation of Time-Dependent Density-Functional Response Theory: N2 as a Case Study. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 5134−5147. (57) Amiri, K.; Rostami, A.; Rostami, A. CuFe2O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Catalyzed Odorless Synthesis of Sulfides Using Phenylboronic Acid and Aryl Halides in the Presence of S8. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 7522−7528.

15118

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02439 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 15110−15118