Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 1
Clear Creek Legend Golf Course Surface Water Intake
±
Hydrology Lake / Pond Reservoir Stream / River NLCD Recreational Grasses HUC 18 0
1.25
2.5
5
Miles 7.5
Figure 5.1. Watershed map of West Palm Beach Community Water System
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 2
Ward Lake Legend Golf Course
± 0
Surface Water Intake Hydrology Lake / Pond Stream / River
1
2
4
Miles 6
NLCD Recreational Grasses HUC 18
Figure 5.2. Watershed map of Bradenton Community Water System
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Color insert - 3
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Intake Golf course Hydrology Watershed boundary
. Figure 5.3. Watershed map of Thomasville Community Water System.
Figure 6.1. Diagram illustrating the reduction in variability moving from modeling to monitoring.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 4
Figure 6.2. General location of the study watersheds within each state. Population within each watershed is symbolized.
Figure 6.4. GIS presentation of the Ohio BA-VN watershed.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 5
Figure 6.5. GIS presentation of the Ohio BE-VN watershed.
Figure 6.6. GIS presentation of the Ohio CE-VN watershed.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 6
Figure 6.7. GIS presentation of the Ohio CH-VN watershed.
Figure 6.8. GIS presentation of the Ohio NF-VN watershed.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 7
Figure 6.9. GIS presentation of the Pennsylvania EL-VN watershed.
Figure 6.10. GIS presentation of the Pennsylvania NO-VN watershed.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 8
Figure 6.11. GIS presentation of the Pennsylvania PBA-VN watershed.
Figure 6.12. GIS presentation of the Pennsylvania PBE-VN watershed.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 9
Figure 6.13. GIS presentation of the Pennsylvania BF-VN watershed.
Figure 6.14. Log/log plot of the relationship between PRZM/EXAMS exposure estimates and model overprediction.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 10
Figure 6.15. Predicted exposure concentrations in the study watersheds using the BASF dilution calculation.
Figure 6.16. Predicted exposure concentrations in the study watersheds using the USEPA dilution calculation.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 11
Figure 6.17. Predicted exposure concentrations in the study watersheds using WARP for the state of Ohio.
Figure 6.18. Predicted exposure concentrations in the study watersheds using WARP for the state of Pennsylvania.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
Downloaded by 65.111.170.46 on May 17, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date (Web): December 20, 2009 | doi: 10.1021/bk-2009-1028.ap001
Color insert - 12
Figure 6.20. Comparison of the Index Reservoir conceptual model and a GIS coverage of an actual watershed. The arrows indicate aerial drift enters the water body from all directions.
Nett et al.; Turf Grass: Pesticide Exposure Assessment and Predictive Modeling Tools ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2010.
