Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Article

Ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) quantification of nine target indoles in sparkling wines Rebeca Tudela, Albert Ribas-Agustí, Susana Buxaderas, Montserrat Riu-Aumatell, Massimo Castellari, and Elvira Lopez-Tamames J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01254 • Publication Date (Web): 05 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 7, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 19

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1 2

Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC)–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Quantification of Nine Target Indoles in Sparkling Wines

3 4

Rebeca Tudela†, Albert Ribas-Agustí‡, Susana Buxaderas†, Montserrat Riu-Aumatell† *, Massimo Castellari‡, and Elvira López Tamames†

5 6 7 8

†

9

‡

Departament de Nutrició i Bromatologia, Xarxa de Referència en Tecnologia dels Aliments (XaRTA), Institut de recerca en Nutrició i Seguretat Alimentària (INSA), Universitat de Barcelona, Campus de l’Alimentació de Torribera, Av. Prat de la Riba 171, 08921 Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain. IRTA-Monells, Finca Camps i Armet s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain

10 11 12

*

13

ABSTRACT

14

An ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)–tandem mass spectrometry

15

(MS/MS) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of nine target

16

indoles in sparkling wines. The proposed method requires minimal sample pretreatment,

17

and its performance parameters (accuracy, repeatability, LOD and matrix effect)

18

indicate that it is suitable for routine analysis.

19

Four indoles were found at detectable levels in commercial Cava samples: 5-

20

methoxytryptophol (5MTL), tryptophan (TRP), tryptophan ethyl ester (TEE) and N-

21

acetylserotonin (NSER). Two of them, namely NSER and 5MTL, are reported here for

22

the first time in sparkling wines, with values of 0.3-2 µg/mL and 0.29-29.2 µg/mL,

23

respectively. In the same samples, the contents of melatonin (MEL), serotonin (SER), 5-

24

hydroxytryptophan (5-OHTRP), 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5OHIA) and 5-

25

methoxy-3-indoleacetic acid (5MIA) were all below the corresponding limits of

26

detection.

Corresponding author. Tel.: (+34) 934033795; fax: (+34) 934035931 E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Riu-Aumatell)

27 28

Keywords: UHPLC-MS/MS, melatonin, sparkling wine, indole, tryptophan ethyl ester

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 19

29

INTRODUCTION

30

The presence of the ubiquitous neurohormone melatonin (MEL) in grapes and wines

31

has generated great interest within the wine industry in recent years.1-9 MEL is

32

considered to be a bioactive compound10 with antioxidant activities that have been

33

related to the presence of two side chains in the indole ring.11 Studies from 2006

34

onwards suggest that MEL may be formed in grapes;3,12-18 however, the most recent

35

findings indicate that MEL is only accumulated during the winemaking process. Thus,

36

its presence in wine would be strictly related to the activity of yeast during

37

fermentation.1,2,19 MEL can be formed by Saccharomyces yeasts from precursors of the

38

common tryptophan (TRP) biosynthetic pathway, via 5-hydroxytryptophan (5OHTRP),

39

serotonin (SER) and N-acetylserotonin (NSER). Alternative MEL formation involves a

40

secondary metabolic pathway of S. cerevisiae via the O-methylation of serotonin

41

followed

42

methoxytryptophol (5MTL) is produced by yeasts in association with MEL. 19

43

Several authors have showed that wines may contain only melatonin1,7,8,12,13; or just one

44

tentatively identified MEL isomer3; or, in a few cases, melatonin and up to three

45

possible MEL isomers5,21. More recently, tryptophan ethylester (TEE) has been

46

identified as one of the compounds previously reported to be the most abundant MEL

47

isomers in red wine.22 These recent findings underline the need for advanced analytical

48

techniques to elucidate the indole-derived compounds involved in melatonin

49

metabolism.

50

Determination of MEL and related indoles in wine was initially carried out using HPLC

51

with fluorimetric detection (HPLC-F),4,7 and capillary electro chromatography (CE)

52

with immobilized carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes.12 However, the protocols

by

the

N-acetylation

of

5-methoxytryptamine.20


Furthermore,

5-

Page 3 of 19


53

require different sample pretreatments such as microextraction by a packed sorbent

54

(MEPS) or solid-phase extraction (SPE) in order to improve MEL detection; even

55

though they increase the total analysis time.4,5,7,13,23,24 More recently, “hyphenated”

56

techniques such as LC-MS/MS, UHPLC-MS/MS or LC coupled to high resolution mass

57

spectrometry (HRMS) have been used to determine MEL and other related compounds

58

in wines.3,5,21,22 The advantage of these techniques is the simplified sample preparation,

59

e.g. dilution or filtration, and the structural information provided by the MS detectors

60

that supports identification.

61

Production of Spanish “Cava” sparkling wines follows the classical or traditional

62

method, which includes a second fermentation of the base wine to obtain the

63

characteristic foam, and aroma. At the end of the second fermentation, yeast cells die

64

and remain in contact with the wine for a long time (up to several months). At this

65

stage, the intracellular compounds, including TRP, are released into the wine,3,24-27 and

66

contribute to the development of the particular flavor and aroma of sparkling wines.

67

To the best of our knowledge, no study of MEL and its metabolic pathway has been

68

performed before now in sparkling wine. Since traditional sparkling wines undergo two

69

fermentations, it might be expected that the assessment of the metabolic pathways of

70

indole-derived compounds could be important to clarify the role of yeast and lees

71

autolysis in the development of the characteristic qualities of sparkling wine.25-27

72

Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a suitable UHPLC-MS/MS method for

73

the simultaneous identification and quantification of MEL and other indole compounds

74

(Figure 1) involved in the melatonin metabolism pathway in sparkling wines. The levels

75

of L-tryptophan (TRP), 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-OHTRP), serotonin (SER), N-

76

acetylserotonin (NSER), melatonin (MEL), 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5OHIA), 5-

77

methoxytryptophol (5MTL), 5-methoxy-3-indoleacetic acid (5MIA) and tryptophan



78

ethyl ester (TEE) in 18 commercial Spanish sparkling wines (Cava) were evaluated; as

79

were the performance parameters of the proposed methods.

80

MATERIALS AND METHODS

81

Chemicals. L-tryptophan, 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan, serotonin hydrochloride, n-acetyl-

82

5-hydroxytryptamine, melatonin, 5-methoxytryptophol, 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid,

83

5-methoxy-3-indoleacetic acid, L-tryptophan ethyl ester hydrochloride, L-tryptophan-d5

84

with an isotopic purity of more than 97% (indole-d5) (internal standard; I.S.),

85

hydrochloric acid and ammonium hydroxide ACS were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St.

86

Louis, USA).

87

Acetonitrile LC–MS grade was from Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany), methanol,

88

hexane and acetone HPLC grade were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

89

Ultra-pure water was obtained using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Milford, MA).

90

The single standard stock solutions and I.S. solution were prepared weekly by

91

dissolving known amounts of pure standards in methanol (1,000 mg/L) and then stored

92

in the dark at 4ºC until analysis. Spiking standard solutions (20 mg/L) were prepared

93

weekly by diluting standard stock solutions with methanol.

94

Samples. Several brands of commercial Cava sparkling wine (n=18) were purchased in

95

local supermarkets, produced at different wineries in the Cava region (Catalonia, Spain).

96

Cava is produced following the traditional method in which a second fermentation is

97

followed by aging in contact with the lees (minimum 9 months) in which the sparkling

98

wine develops the characteristic foam and aroma.26-28

99

Once the bottles were opened, samples were degassed by magnetic stirring for 5 min,

100

and then stored in 250 mL amber flasks at -20ºC until analysis. The entire process was

101

carried out under reduced light conditions to prevent degradation of the melatonin. Just


Page 4 of 19

Page 5 of 19


102

before analysis, the samples were filtered with a nylon membrane filter (0.2 µm)

103

(Waters, Milford, MA).

104

UHPLC-MS/MS Conditions. Analysis was carried out with an Acquity Ultra-

105

PerformanceTM liquid chromatography system (UPLC©), equipped with a binary pump

106

system (Waters, Milford, MA). Detection was carried out using a TQD triple

107

quadrupole MS detector (Waters, Milford, MA). Chromatographic separation was

108

carried out with a BEH C18 Shield column (150 x 1.0 mm i.d.) with a 1.7 µm particle

109

size (Waters, Milford, MA), kept at 30ºC. Linear gradient elution was carried out from

110

95% mobile phase A (5:94.9:0.1 v/v/v ACN:water:formic acid) and 5% B (95:4.9:0.1

111

v/v/v ACN:water:formic acid) to 25% A in 8 minutes, with a flow rate of 0.125

112

mL/min. After each run, the system was stabilized with the initial conditions for one

113

minute before the next injection. Samples were maintained at 10ºC and the injected

114

volume was 8 µL. A standard washing procedure (with weak and strong eluents, i.e. the

115

mobile phases A & B) was included in the chromatographic method after each injection.

116

Carry over was checked for at the beginning of each sample batch by injecting a blank

117

sample (water) after a spiked sample.

118

The electrospray interface (ESI) was operated in positive mode; the source temperature

119

was fixed at 130ºC, the capillary voltage was set at +3.0 kV and the desolvation

120

temperature was set at 350ºC. The cone gas (nitrogen) flow rate was 350 L/h. The gas

121

used in the collision cell was argon at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/min. Multiple reaction

122

monitoring (MRM) mode was used to quantify the compounds. MS/MS experiments

123

were also performed in product ion scan mode29 to study the fragmentation patterns of

124

specific molecular ions. The MRM conditions were optimized using Autotune Wizard

125

Software by infusing standard solutions (10 mg/L) of each compound. Two specific

126

MRM transitions of the deprotonated molecular ions were monitored for each



127

compound; for quantification purposes, the product ion with the higher signal was used.

128

Data acquisition and integration were controlled by MassLynxTM software (version 4.1).

129

Analytic Performance. Standard addition calibration was created by spiking a cava

130

sample with known amounts of standards at five levels (ranging from 1 to 50 µg/L for

131

5MTL, NSER, MEL, 5OHTRP and TEE; from 5 to 50 µg/L for 5MIA and 5OHIA;

132

from 5 to 1,000 µg/L for TRP; and from 100 to 500 µg/L for SER), and by using

133

tryptophan-d5 as the I.S. The stock solution of the I.S. was prepared at 1 mg/mL in

134

mobile phase A. Then the working solution was prepared by diluting to a final

135

concentration of 20 mg /L. Calibration curves were created by plotting the ratio between

136

the area of the more intense transition and the area of the I.S. in the MRM mode, vs. the

137

corresponding concentrations of each target compound.

138

Identification of the target compounds was carried out following the criteria of the

139

Commission Decision 2002/657/CE, by comparing their retention time and MRM

140

product ion ratios with those obtained from pure standards.

141

The performance parameters of the method were established following Long and

142

Winefordner,31 and IUPAC.32 Signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 and 10:1 were considered for

143

LOD and LOQ, respectively.

144

Repeatability was assessed by injection in triplicate of three Cava sparkling wines.

145

Three Cava samples spiked with standard solutions were used in the case of compounds

146

that fell below the LOD in the commercial samples.

147

The accuracy of the analytical assay was determined by analyzing three Cava sparkling

148

wines spiked at two levels with standard solutions (20 µg/L and 50 µg/L for 5MTL,

149

NSER, MEL, 5OHTRP, TEE, 5MIA and 5OHIA; and 100 µg/L and 500 µg/L for TRP

150

and SER respectively), and calculating the ratio between expected and calculated

151

concentrations for each compound.


Page 6 of 19

Page 7 of 19


152

Matrix effects were estimated for each compound by comparing the response in the

153

presence of the matrix (three samples spiked at two levels (50 and 100 µg/L) as for the

154

accuracy assays) with the response of pure compounds at the same concentrations

155

dissolved in a neat solution (mobile phase A).

156 157

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

158

Analytic Performance

159

Table 1 shows the MRM conditions and calibration parameters for the target

160

compounds. Under our conditions, the best responses were obtained by working in

161

positive mode for all the nine compounds that were the objects of this study.

162

The MRM profiles for a mixture of pure standards of the nine target compounds (plus

163

the I.S.), and the profile of a cava sample are shown in the Supporting Information.

164

Separation of all the target compounds was completed within 5.2 minutes which, jointly

165

with the minimal sample preparation, allows a high sample throughput.

166

In all the Cava wine samples, a relevant peak was found at 2.92 minutes with an

167

[M+H]+ of m/z = 232. This peak (MRM profiles of pure standards and cava samples are

168

provided in the Supporting Information) fits the retention time and the product ion

169

spectra of the TEE pure standard (profile of product ions from collision-induced

170

dissociation at 15 V, for the TEE standard is provided in the Supporting Information),

171

while the ratio between ions at m/z 216 and m/z 174 is in agreement with the results of

172

the recent work of Gardana et al.22

173

The linearity of the calibration curves could be considered satisfactory in the ranges of

174

concentration included in the protocol of analysis (Table 1).

175

The LOD of our method in the case of MEL was similar to the values reported by other

176

authors operating with both HPLC-F and LC-MS/MS setups.1,3,4,7,12,13,19,21 The LOD for



177

TRP was better than those previously obtained by other authors working with HPLC-

178

F.13,23,24 The LOD of SER was slightly higher than that reported by Mercolini et al.13

179

with an HPLC-F method; but it was comparable to that previously reported in fruit

180

analysis by HPLC–MS/MS, where the detection limit was 50 µg/L.9

181

The LODs for the other target compounds were always lower than 1 µg/L (Table 1) and

182

only in the case of 5OHIA was the LOD approximately 3 times higher than in the study

183

by Mercolini et al.13 mentioned above using HPLC-F. The LODs for TEE were

184

comparable to that obtained by Vigentini et al.19

185

Both repeatability (with values always lower than 10%) and accuracy (Table 1) can be

186

considered adequate for all the target compounds, taking into account that their levels in

187

real samples are mainly in the range of a few µg/L. Matrix effects were in general lower

188

than 20%; a good result considering that the samples were injected without any pre-

189

treatment to reduce the interfering compounds. Only in the case of 5OHTRP was the

190

ionization suppression higher than 30% (Olajnik et al., 2013)36.

191

Sparkling Wine Results

192

The performance parameters of the method confirm that it is fit for routine analysis

193

(Table 1). To check the suitability of the proposed protocol, a total of 18 samples of

194

commercial sparkling wines were analyzed with the proposed method (Table 2). TRP

195

was the compound detected with the highest concentrations in all the samples. The

196

concentrations of TRP found in Cava sparkling wines were in accordance with the

197

results of Mattivi et al.23 obtained by an HPLC–F method in Chardonnay wines (62-417

198

µg/L); but were somewhat lower than those cited by Hoenicke et al.24 in different white

199

wines.


Page 8 of 19

Page 9 of 19


200

TEE was found in all the Cava samples (Table 2); however, the amounts found in the

201

current study, ranging from 0.1 to 2.7 µg/L, were lower than those found by Gardana et

202

al.22 in Syrah wine (84 µg/L).

203

To the best of our knowledge, no data have previously been reported in the literature for

204

the content of NSER and 5MTL in wines. The indole NSER, which is the immediate

205

precursor of MEL according to its biosynthetic pathway,20 was detected in all the Cava

206

samples. The amount of NSER varied between 0.3 and 2.0 µg/L. Moreover, 5MTL,

207

another MEL precursor,20 was also detected in variable amounts but in only three of the

208

18 samples analyzed (LOD: 29.2 µg/L) (Table 2).

209

MEL, SER, 5MIA, 5OHIA and 5OHTRP were all under the LOD in the samples

210

analyzed in this study (Table 2 and MRM profiles of pure standards and cava samples

211

provided in the Supporting Information). MEL has been found in different kinds of

212

wine at levels ranging from 0.5 to 423 µg/L,1,4,7,12,13,19; with 390.82 µg/L being the

213

higher concentration found in white wine.1 The absence of detectable levels of MEL in

214

Cava wines could be due to the specific technology used for their preparation, which

215

includes a second fermentation and a long aging process (always over a year) which

216

could contribute to the transformation and fading of the MEL present in the base wines.

217

It should also be emphasized that MEL was only found at detectable levels in wines

218

produced at the laboratory scale or analyzed by HPLC-F.1,4,7,13,19 In contrast, the

219

samples included in our study are commercially available Cava sparkling wines with a

220

long ageing (over 12 months) which could have influenced the final levels of MEL.

221

SER was previously found in Albana wine at concentrations below the LOD of our

222

method; while 5OHIA, a SER metabolite, was previously found by Mercolini et al.13 at

223

105 µg/L in white wine. The undetectable levels of these compounds in our samples



224

could be related to the different conditions of elaboration of the wine and/or the

225

differences in the LOD values between the methods.

226 227

In summary, a UHPLC MS/MS method for the simultaneous assessment of nine indole

228

compounds involved in MEL metabolism in sparkling wines was developed and its

229

main performance parameters estimated. The proposed protocol requires limited sample

230

pre-treatment, requires about 6 minutes for the complete separation of the nine target

231

compounds and is suitable for routine analysis to give a quick overview of the levels of

232

some of the main indole-derived compounds involved in the MEL metabolism pathway.

233

Among the nine indoles studied, only four were detected in our Cava samples:

234

tryptophan (TRP), tryptophan ethyl ester (TEE), N-acetylserotonin (NSER), and 5-

235

methoxytryptophol (5MTL). The presence of NSER and 5MTL in sparkling wine is

236

reported here for the first time. The proposed method is a promising starting point for

237

further studies to clarify the effect of sparkling wine technology on the MEL

238

biosynthetic pathway.

239

Supporting information

240

MRM profiles for a mixture of pure standards of the nine target compounds (plus the

241

I.S.), and the profile of a cava sample (Figure S1); Profiles of product ions from

242

collision-induced dissociation at 15 V, for the MEL standard (a); the TEE standard (b);

243

and the peak in Cava sparkling wines at 2.92 min (c) (Figure S2) (PDF).

244

This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

245

246


Page 10 of 19

Page 11 of 19


247

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

248

This study was made possible thanks to the financial assistance provided by the

249

Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT) (Spain), via award

250

AGL2011-23872, and the Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain), via project 2014SGR1438.

251 252

REFERENCES

253 254 255

(1) Rodriguez-Naranjo, M.I.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Troncoso, A.M. Melatonin is Synthesised by Yeast During Alcoholic Fermentation in Wines. Food Chem. 2011a, 126, 1608-1613.

256 257 258

(2) Rodriguez-Naranjo, M.I.; Torija, M.J.; Mas, A.; Cantos-Villar, E.; Garcia-Parrilla, M del C. Production of Melatonin by Saccharomyces Strains Under Growth and Fermentation Conditions. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 53, 219-224.

259 260 261

(3) Gomez, F.J.; Raba, J.; Cerutti, S.; Silva, M.F. Monitoring Melatonin and its Isomer in Vitis Vinifera cv. Malbec by UHPLC-MS/MS from Grape to Bottle. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 52, 349-355.

262 263 264

(4) Rodriguez-Naranjo, M. I.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Troncoso, A. M.; Cantos-Villar, E.; Garcia-Parrilla, M. C. Melatonin: A New Bioactive Compound in Wine. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2011b, 24, 603-608.

265 266 267

(5) Vitalini, S.; Gardana, C.; Simonetti, P.; Fico, G.; Iriti, M. Melatonin, Melatonin Isomers and Stilbenes in Italian Traditional Grape Products and their Antiradical Capacity. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 54, 322-333.

268 269 270

(6) Arevalo-Villena, M.; Bartowsky, E.J.; Capone, D.; Sefton, M.A. Production of Indole by Wine-Associated Microorganisms Under Oenological Conditions. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 685-690.

271 272 273

(7) Mercolini, L.; Addolorata Saracino, M.; Bugamelli, F.; Ferranti, A.; Malaguti, M.; Hrelia, S.; Raggi, M.A. HPLC-F Analysis of Melatonin and Resveratrol Isomers in Wine Using an SPE Procedure. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31, 1007-1014.

274 275 276

(8) Vitalini, S.; Gardana, C.; Zanzotto, A.; Fico, G.; Faoro, F.; Simonetti, P.; Iriti, M. From Vineyard to Glass: Agrochemicals Enhance the Melatonin and Total Polyphenol Contents and Antiradical Activity of Red Wines. J. Pineal Res. 2011, 51, 278-285.

277 278 279

(9) Huang, X.; Mazza, G. Simultaneous Analysis of Serotonin, Melatonin, Piceid and Resveratrol in Fruits Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011, 1218, 3890-3899.



280 281 282 283

(10) Mas, A.; Guillamon, J.M.; Torija, M.J.; Beltran, G.; Cerezo, A.B.; Troncoso, A.M.; Garcia-Parrilla, M.C. Bioactive Compounds Derived From the Yeast Metabolism of Aromatic Amino Acids During Alcoholic Fermentation. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 7 pp.

284 285 286 287 288

(11) Spadoni, G.; Diamantini, G.; Bedini, A.; Tarzia, G.; Vacondio, F.; Silva, C.; Rivara, M.; Mor, M.; Plazzi, P. V.; Zusso, M.; Franceschini, D.; Giusti, P. Synthesis, Antioxidant Activity and Structure-Activity Relationships for a New Series of 2-(Acylaminoethyl) Indoles with Melatonin-Like Cytoprotective Activity. J. Pineal Res. 2006, 40, 259-269.

289 290 291 292

(12) Stege, P.W.; Sombra, L.L.; Messina, G.; Martinez, L.D.; Silva, M.F. Determination of Melatonin in Wine and Plant Extracts by Capillary Electrochromatography with Immobilized Carboxylic Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Stationary Phase. Electrophoresis. 2010, 31, 2242-2248.

293 294 295

(13) Mercolini, L.; Mandrioli, R.; Raggi, M.A. Content of Melatonin and Other Antioxidants in Grape-Related Foodstuffs: Measurement Using a MEPS-HPLC-F Method. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 53, 21-28.

296 297

(14) Iriti, M.; Rossoni, M.; Faoro, F. Melatonin Content in Grape: Myth or Panacea?. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 1432–1438.

298 299 300

(15) Murch, S.J.; Hall, B.A.; Le, C.H.; Saxena, P.K. Changes in the Levels of Indoleamine Phytochemicals During Véraison and Ripening of Wine Grapes. J. Pineal Res. 2010, 49, 95-100.

301 302 303

(16) Vitalini, S.; Gardana, C.; Zanzotto, A.; Simonetti, P.; Faoro, F.; Fico, G.; Iriti, M. The Presence of Melatonin in Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera L.) Berry Tissues. J. Pineal Res. 2011, 51, 331-337.

304 305 306 307

(17) Boccalandro, H.E.; Gonzáles, C.V.; Wunderlin, D.A.; Silva, M.F. Melatonin Levels, Determined by LC-ESI-MS/MS, Deeply Fluctuate During the Day in Vitis Vinifera cv Malbec. Evidences for its Antioxidant Role in Fruits. J. Pineal Res. 2011, 51, 226-232.

308 309 310

(18) Gomez, F.J.; Hernández, I.G.; Martinez, L.D.; Silva, M.F.; Cerutti, S. Analytical Tools for Elucidating the Biological Role of Melatonin in Plants by LC-MS/MS. Electrophoresis. 2013, 34, 1749-1756

311 312 313 314

(19) Vigentini, I.; Gardana, C.; Fracassetti, D.; Gabrielli, M.; Foschino, R.; Simonetti, P.; Tirelli, A.; Iriti, M. Yeast Contribution to Melatonin, Melatonin Isomers and Tryptophan-Ethylester During Alcoholic Fermentation of Grape Musts. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 58, 388-396.


Page 12 of 19

Page 13 of 19


315 316 317

(20) Sprenger, J.; Hardeland, R.; B. Fuhrberg, Han, S.-Z. Melatonin and Other 5Methoxylated Indoles in Yeast: Presence in High Concentrations and Dependence on Tryptophan Availability. Cytologia. 1999, 64, 209-213.

318 319 320

(21) Kocadağlı, T.; Yılmaz, C.; Gökmen, V. Determination of Melatonin and its Isomer in Foods by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 151-156.

321 322 323

(22) Gardana, C.; Iriti, M.; Stuknyte, M.; De Noni, I.; Simonetti, P. ‘Melatonin Isomer’ in Wine Is Not an Isomer of the Melatonin but Tryptophan-Ethylester. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 435-441.

324 325 326

(23) Mattivia, F.; Vrhovsek, U.; Versini, G. Determination of Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Tryptophan and Other Indoles in Must and Wine by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection. J. Chromatogr. A. 1999, 855, 227-235.

327 328 329

(24) Hoenicke, K.; Simat, T. J.; Steinhart, H.; Köhler, H. J.; Schwab, A. Determination of Free and Conjugated Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Tryptophan, and Tryptophan Metabolites in Grape Must and Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5494-5501.

330 331 332

(25) Henschke, P.A.; Jiranek, V. Yeasts - Metabolism of Nitrogen Compounds. In: Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology; G.H. Fleet (Ed.), Harwood Academic Publishers: Chur, Switzerland, 1993; pp.77-164.

333 334

(26) Alexandre, H.; Guilloux-Benatier, M. Yeast Autolysis in Sparkling Wine A Review. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2006, 12, 112-127.

335 336

(27) Buxaderas, S.; López-Tamames, E. Sparkling Wines: Features and Trends From Tradition. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 66, 1-45.

337 338 339 340

(28) Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 of 14 July 2009 Laying Down Certain Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as Regards Protected Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications, Traditional Terms, Labelling and Presentation of Certain Wine Sector Products.

341 342 343

(29) Murray, K.K.; Boyd, R.K.; Eberlin, M.N.; Langley, G.J.; Li, L.; Naito, Y. Definition of Terms Relating to Mass Spectrometry (IUPAC Recommendations 2013). Pure Appl. Chem. 2013, 85, 1515-1609.

344 345

(30) European Commission, Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002, Off. J. European Union L221. 2002, 8-36.

346 347

(31) Long, G.L.; Winefordner, J.D. Limit of Detection A Closer Look at the IUPAC Definition. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 712-724.

348 349

(32) IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, second ed., 1997, see http://iupac.org/publications/analytical compendium/Cha18sec437.pdf.



350 351 352 353

(33) Olajnik, M.; Jedziniak, P.; Szprengier-Juszkiewicz, T.; Żmudzki, J. Influence of Matrix Effect on the Performance of the Method for the Official Residue Control of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Animal Muscle. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27, 437-442.

354 355 356 357


Page 14 of 19

Page 15 of 19


Table 1: MRM conditions andlinearity parameters for the target indoles analyzed Compound

[M+H]+

Cone voltage

5MIA

5-Methoxyindole-3-acetic acid

206.2

24

5MTL

5-Methoxytryptophol

192.1

28

NSER

N-acetylserotonin (N-Acetyl-5-hydroxytryptamine)

219.2

22

5OHIA

5-Hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid

192.3

24

TRP

Tryptophan

205.1

20

TRPd5

Deuterated tryptophan

210.3

20

MEL

Melatonin

233.1

24

5OHTRP

5-Hydroxy-L-tryptophan

221.3

20

SER

Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine)

177.3

16

TEE

Tryptophan ethyl ester

233.1

20

a

(IS)

Collision energy

MRM transitiona

30 42 26 34 20 38 38 48 22 30 22 30 18 12 20 28 24 28 18 20

206.2 > 117.7 206.2 > 145.6 192.1 > 159.6 192.1 > 131.5 219.2 > 160.5 219.2 > 115.7 192.3 > 117.9 192.3 > 91.7 205.1 > 146.6 205.1 > 118.7 210.3 > 151.6 210.3 > 123.4 233.1 > 174.2 233.1 > 216.1 221.3 > 162.5 221.3 > 134.6 177.3 > 160.5 177.3 > 115.7 233.1 > 174.0 233.1 > 159.0

R2

Repeatability

b

Matrix c effects (n=6)

Accuracyd

LOD

LOQ

(µg/L)

(µg/L)

(n=3)

0.9988

0.61

2.01

7.5

15.6 %

97.9

0.9973

0.29

0.96

8.0

12.9 %

97.1

0.998

0.05

0.17

0.5 %

97.0

0.9982

1.46

4.82

-26.8 %

99.2

0.9999

0.13

0.43

- 10.1%

98.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.9935

0.02

0.17

4.8

19.7 %

98.3

0.9997

0.11

0.36

3.6

- 38.8 %

99.0

0.9987

19.8

65.34

8.2

- 14.2 %

98.2

0.9953

0.01

0.03

-4.6 %

101.0

) First transition as ben used for Quantification

b

) n=3 samples in triplicate. Cava samples spiked with pure standards of the compounds below detectable levels in real samples (5 ppb for 5MIA, 5MTL, 5OHIA, MEL and 5OHTRP; 100 ppb for SER) c) Mean variation of the signals in spiked sample compared to those of pure standards dissolved in mobile phase A d ) Calculated as: (expected value/ observed value) * 100

358 359


(n=3)

8.2 9.3 5.9

6.4

(n=6)


Table 2. Indole levels in sparkling wine samples (expressed as µg/L sample) Compound (Abbr)

Category

% vol

Cava type

TRP

TEE

5MTL

NSER

Cava Cava Cava Cava Cava Cava Cava Cava

35.7 5.9 8.0 18.8 35.6 178.9 574.9 22.7

0.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 1.9 2.7 0.1

Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents