Uptake, Accumulation, and in Planta Distribution of Coexisting Cerium

Oct 12, 2017 - Lorenzo Rossi , Hamidreza Sharifan , Weilan Zhang , Arthur P. Schwab , Xingmao Ma. Environmental Science: Nano 2018 5 (1), 150-157 ...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by LAURENTIAN UNIV

Article

Uptake, accumulation and in-planta distribution of co-existing cerium oxide nanoparticles and cadmium in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Lorenzo Rossi, Weilan Zhang, Arthur Paul Schwab, and Xingmao Ma Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03363 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 13, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Uptake, accumulation and in-planta distribution of co-existing cerium oxide

2

nanoparticles and cadmium in Glycine max (L.) Merr.

3

Lorenzo Rossi1,a, Weilan Zhang1, Arthur Paul Schwab2, Xingmao Ma1,*

4

5

6

1

7

Station, TX 77843-3136, USA

8

2

9

TX 77843-2474, USA

Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, TAMU 3136, College

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, TAMU 2474, College Station,

10

11

*For correspondence:

12

Dr. Xingmao Ma

13

Zachry Department of Civil Engineering

14

Texas A&M University

15

TAMU 3136

16

College Station, TX 77843-3136 USA

17

18

a

19

University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA

Current Address: Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

20

TOC:

21 22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28

35

Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

36

Agricultural soils are likely to be polluted by both conventional and emerging

37

contaminants at the same time. Understanding the interactions of co-existing engineered

38

nanoparticles (ENPs) and trace-elements (a common source of abiotic stress) is critical to gain

39

insights into the accumulation of these two groups of chemicals by plants. The objectives of this

40

study were to determine the uptake and accumulation of co-existing ENPs and trace-elements by

41

soybeans and to gain insights into the physiological mechanisms resulting in different plant

42

accumulation of these materials. The combinations of three cadmium levels: 0 (control) and 0.25

43

and 1 mg kg-1 dry soil, and two CeO2NPs concentrations: 0 (control) and 500 mg kg-1 dry soil

44

were investigated. Measurements of the plant biomass and physiological parameters indicated

45

that CeO2NPs led to higher Fv/Fm ratio, suggesting that CeO2NPs enhanced the plant light energy

46

use efficiency by photosystem II. In addition, the presence of CeO2NPs did not affect Cd

47

accumulation in soybean, but Cd significantly increased the accumulation of Ce in plant tissues,

48

especially in roots and older leaves. The altered Ce in-planta distribution was partially associated

49

with the formation of root apoplastic barriers in the co-presence of Cd and CeO2NPs.

50

51

Keywords: cerium oxide nanoparticles, cadmium, soybean, Glycine max, root barriers

52

53

54

55

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

56

57

Page 4 of 28

Introduction Trace-elements are hazardous for the environment and can be carcinogenic to humans 1, 2

58

after prolonged exposure

59

concentrations of these elements can be increased to harmful levels to both plants and animals by

60

human activities

61

fuels, use of fertilizers and pesticides, manufacturing of batteries and other metal products,

62

sewage sludge and municipal waste disposal 5, can lead to higher concentrations of trace-

63

elements in the ecosystem. Among these trace-elements, cadmium (Cd) is of great concern

64

because of its toxicity to animals and humans. Cd can accumulate in plants at concentrations that

65

are not phytotoxic but might be toxic to animals eating the plants 6. Cd toxicity affects humans

66

more than animals, because of their longevity and the accumulation of Cd in their organs by

67

eating Cd-contaminated food 7.

3, 4

. Although trace-elements are naturally present in the soil, the

. Anthropic activities such as metal mining and smelting, burning of fossil

68

Cadmium is present in soil as Cd2+ and its concentration on the earth’s crust has most

69

often been reported from 0.1 to 0.5 mg kg-1, but much higher and lower values have also been

70

reported 8. In uncontaminated soils, Cd ranges from 0.1 to 1.0 mg kg-1 8. Numerous studies have

71

been conducted aiming to better understand the interactions between Cd and plants because Cd

72

uptake from food consumption has been identified as a primary source of human exposure to Cd

73

due to its highly efficient soil-to-plant transfer compared with other trace-elements 9. Moreover,

74

a World Health Organization study estimated that food accounts for about 90% of Cd exposure

75

in the general non-smoking population 10.

76

Meanwhile, the rapid advancement of nanotechnology significantly increases the

77

manufacturing, application and release of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) into the environment,

78

leading to a potential increase in human and environmental exposure to ENPs 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

11, 12

. Among a

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

79

plethora of available ENPs nowadays, cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2NPs) are widely used in

80

the production of catalysts, sunscreen creams, fuel additives, microelectronics and polishing

81

agents due to their unique catalytic and optic properties

82

frequent occurrence of CeO2NPs in the environment, with agricultural soil as an important sink

83

14

84

agricultural crops

85

well as the impact of various abiotic stresses 22, 23 and growing conditions 24 on the accumulation

86

of CeO2NPs in plants have been investigated. Notably, environmental stresses play a crucial role

87

in the plant accumulation of CeO2NPs and often lead to higher accumulation of Ce in plant

88

tissues

89

particularly alleviating the oxidative stresses at leaf level. For instance, CeO2NPs led to changes

90

in canola (Brassica napus L.) growth and physiology improving the plant salt stress response 22.

91

In a different study, Rico, et al.

92

stress enzymes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings, leading to an overall better plant physiology.

13

. These applications have led to the

. As a result, the physiological and biochemical impacts of CeO2NPs on a wide variety of

15, 25

15-18

, the extent and mechanisms of CeO2NPs accumulation in crops

19-21

, as

. On the other hand, CeO2NPs conferred protection against abiotic stresses,

26

found that CeO2NPs modified the activities of anti-oxidative

93

Metal stress is common in agricultural soils. However, the impact of trace-element on

94

plant accumulation of CeO2NPs, or other ENPs, has not been explored. In a few studies which

95

examined the plant interactions with co-existing trace-elements and ENPs, emphasis was placed

96

on the physiological effects of ENPs in the presence of trace-elements and the altered trace-

97

element uptake and accumulation by ENPs

98

metabolism in several plant species exposed to different trace-elements

99

antioxidative defense, detoxification, and signaling systems. TiO2NPs and ZnONPs increased the

27, 28

. For example, TiO2NPs modulated the energy

100

plant uptake of cadmium and other pollutants from the soil

101

shown to reduce trace-element uptake by wheat seedlings

23

27, 30

19, 20, 29

, enhancing the

. However, Fe3O4NPs were

. The contradicting effects of ENPs

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 28

102

on plant metal uptake may arise from the different ENPs and plant species studied. So far no

103

studies have been conducted with regard to the interactions between plants and co-existing

104

CeO2NPs and Cd.

105

Given the high probability of Cd and CeO2NPs co-occurrence in agricultural soils and

106

their potential interactions, an investigation into the impacts of the co-presence of Cd and

107

CeO2NPs would yield important results. In this experiment, Glycine max (L.) Merr. is employed

108

as a representative crop due to its considerable significance for global agriculture, contributing

109

about 40% of annual oilseed crop yield in the world

110

each year.

31

and about $30 billion to the global market

111

The objectives of this study were: (i) to determine the uptake, accumulation and in-planta

112

distribution of co-existing Cd and Ce and (ii) to examine to underlying physiological and root

113

anatomical changes in the co-presence of Cd and CeO2NPs.

114

115

Material and Methods

116

CeO2NPs and Cd

117

CeO2NPs coated with Poly Vinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) dispersion were purchased from the

118

US Research Nanomaterials, Inc. (Houston, TX). The Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

119

image of the CeO2NPs used in this study was reported elsewhere

120

CeO2NPs is 41.7 + 5.2 nm, determined by measuring the diameter of over 100 nanoparticles on

121

the TEM image with ImageJ. The zeta potential of the CeO2NPs dispersed in water at 500 mg

122

L−1 was −51.57 mV, as measured by dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern

123

Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). A CeO2NPs concentration of 500 mg kg-1 dry sand was 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

22

. The average size of the

Page 7 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

124

chosen because the majority of the previous studies on the toxicity of CeO2NPs to terrestrial

125

plants used concentrations in the range of 1−1000 mg L-1 and our previous studies also indicated

126

that CeO2NPs at this concentration affect plant physiology but is not lethal to plants 32.

127

Cd sulfate (CdSO4) was purchased from Fisher Scientific Int. (Pittsburgh, PA) and was

128

totally dissolved in the nutrient solution to reach the targeted concentrations (0.25 and 1.0 mg kg-

129

1

130

represented the background Cd concentrations in many agricultural soils 8, 33.

dry sand) at the beginning of the experiment. Cd concentrations were chosen because they

131

132

Plant species and growth conditions

133

Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean) cv. ‘Tohya’ seeds were purchased from Johnny’s

134

Selected Seeds (Winslow, ME). Soybean seeds were germinated in moist sand for 5 days. After

135

germination, young seedlings were individually transplanted into 9.5 cm diameter × 12 cm

136

height plastic pots filled with 500 g of sand (Quikrete, Atlanta, GA). The sand was saturated with

137

25% Hoagland solution

138

made CeO2NPs stock solution (3125, mg L-1) and/or known amount of cadmium sulfate (CdSO4)

139

anhydrous (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were introduced to the plastic pots before

140

transplant to achieve a concentration of 500 mg kg-1 CeO2NPs and/or 0.25 and 1.0 mg kg-1 Cd2+

141

dry sand. Sand has the advantages of being a less complicated system than soil, due to less

142

adsorption, maximizing the chemical lability of the added cadmium. Five plants for each

143

treatment were grown at room temperature under fluorescent bulbs providing 250 µmol m2 s-1

144

photosynthetic photon flux density (16 h light – 8 h dark photoperiod). Plants were fert-irrigated

34

(Phyto Technology Lab, Shawnee Mission, KS). 80 mL of freshly

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

145

with full strength Hoagland for 30 days. Plants grown in Hoagland without the addition of

146

CdSO4 and CeO2NPs were used as controls.

147

148

Growth analyses and biomass partitioning

149

After the 30-day growth period, five plants per treatment were carefully removed from

150

the growth media and rinsed with deionized water, divided into roots and leaves and then, tapped

151

dry with a paper towel. The root and leaf tissues from each replicates were dried in an oven at 70

152

ºC for 7 days to determine the dry biomass (DW), and concentrations of sodium and cerium in

153

these tissues. Fresh root samples from each plant were collected and stored at 4 ºC in pure

154

methanol for root anatomical analysis. Detailed descriptions of the analytical parameters and

155

procedures are provided below.

156

157

Cadmium and Cerium contents analyses

158

A 0.5 g subsample of dry plant tissues was digested using a DigiPREP MS hot block

159

digester (SCP Science, Clark Graham, Canada), following the EPA method 3050b 35. Dry leaves

160

and roots of three replicates were ground and mixed with 4 mL of 70% (v/v) nitric acid. The

161

mixture was maintained at room temperature overnight for predigestion, and then was digested in

162

the hot block at 95 °C for 4 hours. After cooling to room temperature, 2 mL of 30% (w/v) H2O2

163

was added to the mixture, further heated in the hot block at 95 °C for 2 hours. Finally, the Ce and

164

Cd in the digestate was quantified by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-

165

MS, Perkin Elmer mod. DRCII, Waltham, MA).

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 28

Page 9 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

166

167

Chlorophyll fluorescence

168

Leaf chlorophyll was analyzed each week using a continuous excitation chlorophyll

169

fluorescence analyzer (OS1p, Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH). Leaves were acclimated to the dark

170

using lightweight leaf clips for at least 30 min before measurements were taken 36. Baseline (F0)

171

and maximum (Fm) fluorescence were measured and variable (Fv = Fm – F0) fluorescence, and

172

the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) ratio were calculated.

173

174

Chlorophyll analysis

175

At the end of the experiment, 30 mg of leaf lamina were collected using a paper puncher,

176

avoiding major veins. Leaf portions were placed in dimethyl formamide (DMF), and chlorophyll

177

was extracted using the method described by Moran 37. The absorbance was read at 664 and 647

178

nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (model Lamba 35; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) and used

179

to calculate leaf chlorophyll concentrations.

180

181

Root Anatomical observations

182

Series of hand sections of roots from each plant were prepared by cutting radial sections

183

of fresh roots. For suberin visualization in fluorescence microscopy, the protocol developed by

184

Lux, et al.

185

freshly prepared solution of Fluorol Yellow 088 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) (0.01%

186

w/v, in lactic acid) at 70°C for 30 min and then rinsed in DI water (three baths of 5 min each).

38

was adopted. Briefly, free hand sections from each treatment were incubated in a

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

187

The roots were counter-stained with aniline blue (0.5% w/v, in water) at room temperature for 30

188

min in darkness and then washed in DI water for 30 min. Samples were then mounted on slides

189

using glycerol 50% and observed under a Zeiss Axiophot epi-fluorescence microscope

190

(Oberkochen, Germany) and documented by a CoolSNAP cf CCD Camera (Photometrics,

191

Tuscon, AZ). All anatomical observations were performed at the Microscopy and Imaging

192

Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Page 10 of 28

193

194

Image and statistical analyses.

195

The length of the root barriers was measured on the fluorescent microscopic images using

196

ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Data were subjected to analysis of variance using a completely

197

randomized experimental design. Since the experiment was set up as a 2 × 2 factorial

198

experiment, where the first factor was CeO2NPs and second was Cd, a two-way ANOVA

199

analysis was also conducted to understand if there was an interaction between the two

200

independent variables: CeO2NPs and Cd. In addition, one-way ANOVA was performed and

201

means separation between treatments was obtained by the Tukey’s test. Data were analyzed

202

using the Minitab 17 Statistical Software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA).

203

204

Results

205

Growth analysis

206

CeO2NPs alone were not associated with significant changes in the dry weight (DW)

207

when compared with the control. However, leaf, root, and total biomass all were significantly

208

lower in the presence of 1.0 mg kg-1 Cd and root biomass was significantly lower in the presence 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

209

of 0.25 mg kg-1 Cd. (Fig. 1). Cadmium treated plants decreased their total biomass (Fig. 1A) by

210

approximately 11% (Cd 0.25) and 31% (Cd 1.0) respectively. CeO2NPs did not aggravate the Cd

211

toxicity (p CeO2NPs × Cd = 0.576). In fact, the total dry weight of soybeans treated with

212

CeO2NPs + Cd 0.25 was slightly higher than plants exposed to Cd 0.25 alone. No significant

213

differences was observed between plants treated by CeO2NPs + Cd 1.0 and Cd 1.0 for all plant

214

tissues. Plants treated with CeO2NPs alone showed a 18% reduction in their root biomass and

215

plants treated with Cd 0.25 and Cd 1.0 showed a decrease by 30 and 34%, respectively (mostly

216

due to the effect of Cd alone, p Cd