Use of Reconstitued Yolk Systems To Study the Gelation Mechanism

Dec 8, 2017 - (13) using a custom-made aluminum device composed of two heat transfer blocks (23.2 cm length, 7.2 cm width, and 2.5 cm height) and an a...
10 downloads 24 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Article

USE OF RECONSTITUTED YOLK SYSTEMS TO STUDY THE GELATION MECHANISM OF FROZEN-THAWED HEN EGG YOLK Monica Primacella, Tong Wang, and Nuria C. Acevedo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04370 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 9, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

USE OF RECONSTITUED YOLK SYSTEMS TO STUDY THE GELATION MECHANISM OF FROZEN-THAWED HEN EGG YOLK

Monica Primacella, Tong Wang, Nuria C. Acevedo*

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University 2312 Food Sciences Building, 536 Farm House Lane, Ames, Iowa 5011, United States

*

Corresponding author

Tel.: 515-294-5962 (N. Acevedo) Fax: 515-294-8181 Email address: [email protected]

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

2

1

ABSTRACT: Yolk gelation upon 5-week freezing-thawing was studied in 4 recombined yolk

2

systems containing different plasma and granule proportions. Fractionation for mass distribution,

3

sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for protein distribution

4

and rheological properties were explored. Results indicate that both plasma and granule

5

components including LDL, HDL, and α-livetin proteins, contributed to gelation. Protein

6

aggregation was reflected through large mass increase in granule fraction and appearance of a

7

floating LDL layer upon fractionation of gelated yolk systems. A significant increase in gel

8

strength (elastic modulus, G’) was observed with the increase of granule content. Overall, this

9

study provides a better understanding of yolk gelation mechanism that may consequently lead to

10

the design of innovative methods for preventing gelation. A schematic presentation of yolk

11

gelation mechanism is also proposed.

12

KEYWORDS: egg yolk, gelation, freezing, lipoproteins

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 40

Page 3 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

3

21

INTRODUCTION

22

Hen egg yolk is one of the most used ingredients in many products due to its high

23

nutritional value and unique functionalities. Being an excellent emulsifier, egg yolk is used

24

extensively in foods, such as mayonnaise, salad dressing, and sauces. Recent statistical analysis

25

showed that out of the 231 million cases of shell eggs (or 83 billion eggs) produced in U.S. in

26

2015, approximately 30% underwent breaking for further processing 1. However, when egg

27

yolks are frozen under -6°C and thawed, an irreversible loss of fluidity, termed gelation, occurs.

28

This change is unfavorable because it reduces the yolk functionality and its ability to mix with

29

other ingredients 2. Current gelation prevention practices include the additions of salt, sugar, or

30

corn syrup to yolk prior to freezing 3. However, consumer’s preference for low salt and low

31

sugar products may limit the range of frozen yolk application.

32

Researchers have proposed many different explanations regarding the mechanism of

33

gelation related to its composition. Yolk is composed of about 50% water and 50% dry matter, in

34

which the dry matter could be broken down to 77-81% plasma and 19-23% granules. Plasma

35

contains 85% low density lipoprotein (LDL) and 15% livetin, while granule contains 70% high

36

density lipoprotein (HDL), 16% phosvitin, and 12% LDL 4. Scientists have stated no difference

37

between plasma LDL and granule LDL. The most common explanation for yolk gelation is that

38

there are aggregations of plasma LDLs that result from a concentration of yolk components due

39

to the formation of large ice crystals during freezing 5-7. However, disagreement exists on the

40

mechanism of LDL aggregation. Telis and Kiechbusch 6 proposed that dehydration of proteins

41

located on the surface of LDL micelles following the breaking up of LDL micelles leads to LDL

42

aggregation. Kurisaki et al. 8 suggested surface components of LDL are liberated during freeze-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

4

43

thaw, causing aggregation of the newly exposed sites. Wakamatu et al. 7 believed that LDL

44

aggregates due to conformational changes, and not because of liberation of LDL components.

45

Interaction of protein molecules after disruption of lecithin-protein interactions is another

46

proposed LDL aggregation mechanism by Mahadevan et al. 9 and Kumar and Mahadevan 10. The

47

real cause of LDL aggregation is still unclear.

48

While majority of studies emphasized the role of plasma LDL in yolk gelation, only a

49

few studies include the granule fraction in their work. Wakamatu et al. 7 indicated that they could

50

not exclude the involvement of granular LDL (LDLg) in LDL aggregation because the lipid

51

compositions of LDL and LDLg were very similar. Chang et al. 5 found that gelation was

52

enhanced when granule is in the system, compared to plasma alone. They proposed that LDLg

53

are released from granules disrupted during freezing, causing both LDL and LDLg to aggregate.

54

Regardless of the differences in existing proposed mechanisms of gelation, most researchers

55

agreed that removal of water through ice crystal formation is necessary for gelation to occur.

56

Removal of water by freezing might have decreased physical distance and increased

57

hydrophobic interaction which cause LDL destabilization. Studies showed that phospholipase-A

58

treated LDL had inhibited gelation because they were more hydrophilic 11, 12. A phospholipase-C

59

treated LDL was more lipophilic and it promoted aggregation 9. This provides some evidence

60

that gelation may be due to surface hydrophobic interactions of LDL.

61

The most recent study on the effect of prolonged freezing storage on egg yolk gelation

62

suggested the occurrence of two-stage gelation, which involved aggregation of lipoprotein

63

particles resulting from water removal during slow freezing in the first stage (d 1-28), and release

64

and re-aggregation between or within the previously aggregated proteins in the second stage

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 40

Page 5 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

5

65

(between d 28-84) forming a stronger gel network 13. The author also suggested that

66

granules/HDL particles were also involved in the aggregation, and various methods including

67

evaluations of particle size, matrix mobility, protein aggregation and microstructure were able to

68

show that these components played a role in gelation. However, the involvement of HDL

69

proteins in gelation still needs further validation.

70

The overall goal of this research is to elucidate how the different yolk fractions are

71

involved in freeze-thawed yolk gelation. We hypothesize that during freezing storage, various

72

types of lipoprotein particles in the plasma and granule fractions interact, resulting in gelation.

73

Yolk recombined systems made with different proportions of plasma and granules were studied,

74

and gel properties of these systems and compositions of their fractionated components were

75

analyzed to test our hypothesis.

76 77 78

MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Fresh large Grade AA white shell eggs were obtained from farms in Ames, IA. Eggs

79

were produced by Hy-Line W-36 laying hens raised in conventional cage housing, and hens’ age

80

was 30-35 weeks. Eggs were stored in 4ºC refrigerator at the research laboratory for no longer

81

than 7 days.

82

Yolks were separated following the method by Powrie et al. 2 with modifications. Fresh

83

eggs were manually broken and the yolks were carefully separated from the albumen, with the

84

chalazae removed. Each yolk with intact vitelline membrane was rolled on a paper towel to

85

remove any remaining albumen and chalazae adhering to the vitelline membrane. The vitelline

86

membrane was pierced to collect the pure egg yolk in a beaker. Following the harvest of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

6

87

approximately 1 L of pure egg yolk solution, the yolks in the beaker were slowly stirred for

88

sample homogeneity.

89

Preparation of plasma and granules for recombined yolk systems

90

Yolk was fractionated into plasma and granules using a modified method by McBee and

91

Coterill 14. Yolk was diluted 1:1 (v/v) in deionized water and stirred until they were well-mixed.

92

This dispersion was then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 45 minutes at 4ºC, and the plasma

93

(supernatant) was separated from the granules (pellet). The plasma was centrifuged again using

94

the same parameter for more complete separation of plasma and granules. Following the addition

95

of 200 ppm sodium azide for preservation, the collected fractions were stored in capped

96

containers at 4ºC refrigerator until further processing.

97

Plasma ultrafiltration to remove water

98 99

To remove the added water from centrifugation step, the plasma solution was filtered using the Minimate™ TFF System (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY) with a Minimate™

100

Tangential Flow Filtration Capsules of 5 kD pore size. The filtration was run continuously in 4ºC

101

walk-in refrigerator until plasma volume was reduced by approximately 50%. To ensure

102

adequate water removal, moisture content of plasma was determined using oven drying at 110ºC

103

overnight.

104

Preparation of recombined yolk systems

105

Four yolk systems that would mimic (1) whole egg yolk (78% plasma, 22% granules,

106

db), (2) pure plasma fraction (100% plasma, db), (3) plasma mixed with 50% granule fraction

107

(88% plasma, 12% granules, db), and (4) granule mixed with 50% plasma fraction (64% plasma,

108

36% granules, db) were prepared by adding the filtered plasma fraction to the granule fraction

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 40

Page 7 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

7

109

using calculated proportions (Table 2.1). Moisture and total solid contents were kept constant

110

across the four systems, 53% and 47%, respectively. Mixtures were stirred manually using

111

spatula before mixed with Ultra-Turrax® T rotor stator homogenizer (Laboratory Supply

112

Network, Inc., Atkinson, NH) at 8,000 RPM for 30 seconds for a more homogenous mixture.

113

Yolk freezing and thawing for gel formation

114

The yolk systems were divided into three batches: fresh, frozen, and frozen for rheology

115

and gel measurements. For the frozen samples, 40 g of each yolk mixture was poured into a 50

116

mL conical polypropylene centrifuge tube, and they were vacuum-sealed in a vacuum bag with a

117

FoodSaver® V222 vacuum sealing system (SunBeam Products, Inc., Jarden Consumer Solutions,

118

Boca Raton, FL) to reduce freezer burn. The vacuum-sealed bag of four centrifuge tubes

119

containing the different systems was submerged in the reservoir of a Haake SC 100

120

refrigerated/heated bath circulator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) filled with 1:1

121

ethylene glycol:Milli-Q water at 0°C. The bath was then set to -20°C. After the samples reached

122

-20°C at a cooling rate of 0.3°C/min, they were held in the -20°C bath for 3 hours before storing

123

in a -20°C freezer for 5 weeks.

124

Preparation of samples for rheological analysis

125

Samples for rheology were prepared following a method by Au et al. 13 using a custom-

126

made aluminum apparatus composed of two heat transfer blocks (23.2 cm length, 7.2 cm width,

127

2.5 cm height) and an aluminum mold plate (23.2 cm length, 7.2 cm width, 3 mm height) with

128

five circles of 35 mm-diameter cutouts. The heat transfer blocks were connected with plastic

129

tubing positioned level to the inlet and outlet ports on Haake SC 100 refrigerated/heated water

130

bath circulator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with 1:1 ethylene glycol:Milli-Q water

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

8

131

mixture circulated through the blocks. When temperature reached 0°C, a sheet of Parafilm was

132

placed over the bottom block, followed by the aluminum mold plate filled with egg yolk and

133

another sheet of Parafilm to cover the mold plate. The top heat transfer block was quickly placed

134

over the filled mold plate, and the cooling bath was set to -20°C. After reaching -20°C at a

135

cooling rate of 0.3°C/min, the yolks were held in the apparatus for another hour before the mold

136

plate was removed and sealed in a vacuum bag to reduce freezer burn. The samples were then

137

stored in a -20°C freezer for 5 weeks.

138

Fractionation of egg yolk into plasma, granule, LDL and livetin fractions

139

The four fresh and frozen-thawed yolk systems were fractionated using a method

140

modified from Ulrichs and Ternes 15 and McBee and Cotterill 14, immediately for fresh yolk after

141

they were recombined and five weeks for the frozen-thawed samples. Mixtures of 1:3

142

yolk:deionized water were prepared and stirred until well mixed. The mixtures were again mixed

143

with Rotor-Stator at 8,000 RPM for 30 seconds to improve homogenization. Then, 30 mL of

144

each yolk:water mixture was aliquoted to three 50 mL conical polypropylene centrifuge tubes.

145

The tubes were transferred to a FIBERLite F15-8x-50cy fixed angle rotor in a Sorvall Legend

146

XT centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and centrifuged at 15,500 g and 4°C for 1

147

hour. The plasma (supernatant), granule (pellet), and LDL (floating lipidic layer from frozen

148

systems) were collected and the mass was recorded.

149

The collected plasma was further fractionated into LDL and livetin using a method

150

modified from Ulrichs and Ternes 15. Mixtures of 3:2 plasma:1% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose

151

solution were centrifuged with the same parameter as above. The LDL (floating lipidic layer)

152

and livetin (watery fraction) were collected and the mass was recorded.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 40

Page 9 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

9

153

Determination of mass balance of all fractionated yolk components

154

Small amounts of all fractions were taken for moisture/solid content analysis. Samples

155

were 130°C oven-dried overnight, transferred to a desiccator for 5 minutes, and measured for

156

change in mass. Moisture and solid contents were calculated to allow all data to be converted to

157

dry mass balance (db). Fraction distributions (%) within each system were then compared among

158

yolk systems and between fresh and gelled yolk for changes in fractionation behavior caused by

159

freezing and thawing.

160

Protein characterization by gel electrophoresis

161

Protein distributions of fresh and frozen samples of all four recombined yolk systems

162

were studied using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

163

performed according to Bio-Rad instructions and a modified method from Laca, Paredes, and

164

Díaz 16. Samples of different fractions from each system were diluted in deionized water based

165

on their estimated protein content quantified using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and then 1:1

166

(v/v) in a mixture of 95% Bio-Rad 2x Laemmli Sample Buffer (Tris-HCl/glycerol/bromophenol

167

blue) and 5% β-mercaptoethanol, to bring sample concentrations to approximately 1 µg

168

protein/µL. After dilutions, samples were heated in boiling water bath for 6 minutes. Protein

169

standard Precision Plus Protein™ Dual Color Standards (BioRad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules,

170

CA) and samples containing fractions from the same system were loaded onto a Bio-Rad Mini-

171

PROTEAN® TGX™ precast polyacrylamide gel (4–20% gel, 12-well, 20 µL) at volume of 5 µL

172

for standard and 7 µL for samples, and electrophoresed at 175 V for 35 minutes using the

173

standard SDS-PAGE running buffer (250 mmol Tris, 1.92 mol glycine, and 10 g SDS per L).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

10

174

The gels were fixed in a solution consisting of 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid and 50%

175

deionized water for 30 minutes. After removing the solution, 50 mL Bio-Safe™ Coomassie F-250

176

Stain was added to stain the gels, and gels were gently shaken for 1 hour before rinsed with

177

deionized water for 30 minutes. Gels were scanned with an ImageScanner flatbed scanner

178

(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ) for quantification and kept in water for

179

storage.

180

For densitometry analysis, the scanned images of the gels were processed with Image

181

Processing and Analysis in Java software, ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

182

An external standard was used for calibration following the NIH optical density calibration

183

procedure 17. Each lane on the gel was plotted as a density spectrum where each peak represented

184

a protein band. Each protein band was compared to published literature 18 for protein

185

identification and the optical density, or peak area, was determined. Density is reported in

186

percent relative optical density units (%OD).

187

Rheological analysis

188

After five weeks of freezing, yolk discs were analyzed using an Ares-G2 rheometer (TA

189

Instruments, New Castle, DE) with a set of 25 mm diameter parallel plates. Sample thawing was

190

performed for one disk at a time. A polyvinyl chloride cylindrical plunger (35 mm diameter, 62

191

mm height) was used to push the yolk disk out of the mold to thaw on the bottom parallel plate at

192

room temperature (23ºC) for 15 minutes.

193

All four yolk systems, 10 replicate discs each, were subjected to an oscillation amplitude

194

sweep test. Normal force of 0.2 N was applied for all samples. Oscillation strains in the range of

195

0.1-10% was applied at a frequency of 1 Hz with 41 steps (data points). The average elastic

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 40

Page 11 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

11

196

modulus (G’) within the linear viscoelastic region (LVR) was reported as a measure of gel

197

strength. Yield stress (σ*) was obtained as the stress where a 10% reduction from the average G’

198

of was achieved.

199

With outliers removed, average G’ and σ* were analyzed for significant difference.

200

Values outside mean±2SD range were considered as outliers. With the outliers eliminated, 9

201

discs from system 1:0, 5 discs from system 1:0.5, 8 discs from system 1:1, and 9 discs from

202

system 1:2 were used for data analysis.

203

Statistical analysis

204

Statistical analysis was performed for rheology samples (1 treatment replication, >5

205

samples replications) with JMP Pro 12, statistical software from Statistical Analysis System

206

(SAS) Institute Inc. (Cary, NC). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were conducted,

207

and significance of difference (p-value