Letter Cite This: ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
pubs.acs.org/macroletters
Well-Defined and Precision-Grafted Bottlebrush Polypentenamers from Variable Temperature ROMP and ATRP William J. Neary, Brandon A. Fultz, and Justin G. Kennemur* Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
Downloaded via KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIV on August 22, 2018 at 16:32:39 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
S Supporting Information *
ABSTRACT: Polypentenamer macroinitiators are synthesized through variable temperature ring opening metathesis polymerization of 3-cyclopentenyl α-bromoisobutyrate, which has sufficient ring strain (ΔHp = −22.6 kJ mol−1) to produce targeted molar mass (1000 kg mol−1) and Đ = 1.33. This system exhibits high synthetic versatility and control with a unique flexible backbone to expand the suite of densely grafted polymers.
I
ncreasing the side-chain density of grafted polymers changes their definition to bottlebrush (BB), where significant changes in properties are traversed.1 Inspired by natural proteoglycans,2,3 the BB architecture is best known for its unique combination of large molar mass and low melt viscosities. This is in direct contrast to typical linear polymers, and a viable reason for the prominence of proteoglycans in articular cartilage where lubrication and impact dampening is required.4,5 Synthetic BBs have developed rapidly over the last few decades,1,6−18 however, definitive correlations between physical properties and brush architecture remain elusive. In addition to their biomimetic applications, synthetic BBs and bottlebrush block copolymers (BBCP)s have shown promise in photonic crystals,7 active camouflage,19 lithographic patterning,20 porous membranes,21 drug delivery,22 advanced coatings,23 super elastic/soft gels,24−26 energy storage,27 and sensors.28 Steric interactions, imposed by reducing the number of backbone atoms between each graft (ng) and increasing the side chain degree of polymerization (Nsc), cause the backbone and the side chains to extend into worm-like cylindrical polymers with reduced entanglements.29−31 The divergent set of synthetically modifiable parameters, such as Nsc, ng, and backbone degree of polymerization (Nbb) presents a playground for structure−property relationships experimentally32−41 and theoretically.9,29,42−46 Despite the seemingly limitless selection of graft chemistries, the variety of backbones that permit precise control over high grafting density has been dominated by two types: those derived from vinyl monomers and those from norbornene-based monomers. “Grafting-through” using vinyl-terminated macromonomers, such as polymer-tethered (meth)acrylates47−50 or styrenes,51,52 © XXXX American Chemical Society
result in BBs, often termed polymacromonomers (PMM)s, with one methylene between each graft site (ng = 1). Poly(norbornene)s (PNB) have arguably received the most focus of recent BB and BBCP investigations with many citations listed above and some additional examples provided here.53−66 Norbornene (NB) has a high ring strain, [ΔH] = 113.8 kJ mol−1,67 allowing NB-terminated macromonomers to be “grafted-through” to high conversions and complete grafting fidelity. The PNB BB has a five-carbon repeating unit and typically contains one graft. Therefore, ng = 4 has been accepted as a suitable grafting density to be classified as a BB system. However, the PNB repeating unit also contains a cyclopentane ring that adds an unavoidable enhancement to the backbone rigidity. This is exemplified by the glass transition temperature (Tg) of PNB (∼45 °C)68 which is ∼90 °C higher than its linear five-carbon analog, polycyclopentene (PCP), with Tg = −44 °C.69 Furthermore, many of the ω-NB-macromonomers feature a succinimide ring fused to the NB structure, which exacerbates the backbone rigidity and can raise Tg over 200 °C with only a phenyl group attached to the succinimide nitrogen.70 For comparison, a phenyl branch directly attached to a polypentenamer repeating unit produces a material with Tg = 17 °C.71,72 Many studies focus on the effect that Nsc has on the extension and rigidity of the backbone. Thereby, the rigidity of the PNB BB may be playing a significant role in the correlations of these effects. We Received: July 31, 2018 Accepted: August 20, 2018
1080
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters
5 °C increments from 5−25 °C. Here we note that catalyst choice, in theory, should be independent of the thermodynamic parameters.93 The unique chemical shift of the methine protons of CPBIB and poly(3-cyclopentenyl α-bromoisobutyrate) (PCPBIB) allows for integration comparison to determine conversions (Figure S6). Equilibrium monomer concentration, [M]eq, as a function of temperature is shown in Figure 1a and the linear trend is analyzed through the expression for equilibrium polymerization in eq 1:94
hypothesized that a BB made from a polypentenamer backbone would provide a valuable material for further investigations on the structure−property relationships of densely grafted polymers that is void of these rigidity enhancements and would provide access to a more definitive understanding on the behavior of the ng = 4 topology. ROMP of cyclopentene (CP) derivatives has been largely overshadowed due to their low ring strain, [ΔHp] = ∼23 kJ mol−1,73 which reduces polymerization kinetics and limits high conversions due to the thermodynamics of the equilibrium ROMP. However, ROMP of CP and derivatives has received heightened interest within the last several years.71−87 Recently, we reported a method to achieve high conversion, targeted molar mass, and low dispersity (Đ) PCP by altering the temperature during ROMP.77 This method, which we termed variable temperature ROMP (VT-ROMP), initiates polymerization at warm temperature and propagates CP to high conversion by cooling after initiation is complete. Molar masses near targeted (based on conversion), high conversions, and narrow Đ were achieved. It was also discovered that chain transfer is suppressed at cold temperatures, permitting narrow Đ to be maintained during the slower kinetics. The universality of this method should be applicable to any CP derivative with suitable ring-strain. We aimed to design a new CP monomer with a substituent suitable for initiation of grafting polymerizations using the “grafting-from” technique. We note that “grafting-through” is not a viable option; the dilution of the CP monomer, caused by the excess molar mass of the macromonomer, would prohibit appreciable conversions. The strategy to synthesize our targeted monomer, 3-cyclopentenyl α-bromoisobutyrate (CPBIB), is shown in Scheme 1.
ln[M ]eq =
ΔHp RT
−
ΔSp R
(1)
where T is temperature (K) and R is the gas constant (8.314 J K−1 mol−1). The resulting thermodynamic parameters (ΔHp = −22.6 kJ mol−1 and ΔSp = −74.5 J mol−1 K−1) reveal CPBIB has a ring strain similar to CP (ΔHp = −23.4 kJ mol−1)73 and is well suited for VT-ROMP. This is surprising since bulky substituents on CP rings can have deleterious effects on ΔHp due to Thorpe-Ingold effects.95,96 A series of CPBIB polymerizations was performed in THF using G1 catalyst and a VT-ROMP method of warm initiation at 50 °C for 5 min followed by cooling to 0 °C for 5 h prior to cold termination. Table 1 lists the resulting PCPBIB(Nbb) samples determined by multiangle light scattering size exclusion chromatography (MALS-SEC). For all samples, the molar masses were within 5% of theoretical based on conversions and Đ ≤ 1.23 signifying excellent control using the VT-ROMP method. For monomer to initiator ratios ([M]0/[I]0) of 75, 100, and 150 for PCPBIB(53, 68, and 95), respectively, an increase in molar mass is observed, as expected, while maintaining good control. PCPBIB(61, 63, and 68) were performed in triplicate, albeit at slightly different scales, and show good repeatability for the VT-ROMP method. For a comparison to SEC molar mass, PCPBIB(61) and PCPBIB(63) were characterized by 1H NMR to determine molar mass by end-group analysis (Figure S10). Comparative integration of the olefin protons on the phenyl end group (6.45 and 6.16 ppm, confirmed by COSY-NMR Figure S11) to the repeating unit methine protons (4.87 ppm) results in Mn,NMR = 17.0 and 17.7 kg mol−1, respectively. These values are slightly higher than Mn,MALS but within relatively good agreement. Inverse-gated decoupling 13 C NMR determined that PCPBIB(61) and PCPBIB(63) have approximately 83% trans-olefin isomers (Figure S13): a value consistent with previously reported ROMP at low temperature using similar catalysts.71,77 PCPBIB(61) and PCPBIB(63) were chosen to perform a duplicate series of polystyrene (PS) grafting using standard conditions for ATRP.48 Initiator concentration [BIB]0 was determined by dividing PCPBIB mass by the formula weight of the monomer unit (FWCPBIB = 233 g mol−1). The molar ratios of initial styrene [S]0, [BIB]0, and the remaining ATRP reagents were 600:1:0.4:0.03:0.8 for [S]0/[BIB]0/CuBr/ CuBr 2 /N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA). We chose to use CuBr2 and high [S]0, as this has been shown to aid in grafting efficiency.48 ATRP was performed at 80 °C for 8 h using two different methodologies (Table 2). For PCPBIB(61), five individual yet identical polymerizations were performed and each quenched at the respective time. For PCPBIB(63), a singular polymerization was performed with aliquots taken for analysis every 2 h. We feel this illustrates the repeatability of the grafting experiments
Scheme 1. Synthetic Route to a Polypentenamer Bottlebrush System
Monoepoxidization of cyclopentadiene using peroxyacetic acid followed by reduction to 3-cyclopentenol (3CPOH) is straightforward with acceptable yields (∼50% over both steps).88 The homoallylic alcohol was esterified using αbromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB)89 to produce CPBIB in good yield (93%). The α-bromoisobutyrate (BIB) group is a workhorse initiator used in atom transfer radical polymerizations (ATRP), which would allow subsequent grafting after VT-ROMP.90−92 By placing the BIB functionality on the homoallylic position, a precise five-carbon spacing of these initiation sites along the polypentenamer is achieved. Since the ability to perform ROMP on CPBIB is unknown, the thermodynamics were investigated. Determination of polymerization enthalpy (ΔHp) and entropy (ΔSp) was performed by adding Hoveyda-Grubbs second generation catalyst (HG2) (0.23 mol %) to CPBIB ([M]0 = 2.26 M in toluene-d6) and monitoring ROMP equilibrium by 1H NMR at 1081
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters
Figure 1. (a) Logarithmic equilibrium monomer concentration [M]eq (mol L−1) as a function of inverse temperature (K−1) for ROMP of CPBIB, as determined by 1H NMR analysis. (b) Number-average molar mass (Mn) as a function of ATRP grafting time on PCPBIB(63), as determined by 1 H NMR (triangles), MALS (squares), and RI (circles). Inset shows MALS traces of PCPBIB(63)-g-S showing a decrease in elution time as a function of increasing Nsc. (c) Stacked 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3, 25 °C) of CPBIB, PCPBIB(63), and PCPBIB(63)-g-S(8) highlighting key proton signals of the structures after each chemical transformation. (d) Stacked 13C NMR of PCPBIB(63) and PCPBIB(63)-g-S(8) with inset of the CO signal.
Table 1. Polypentenamer Macroinitiators Produced from VT-ROMPa sample ID
[M]0 (mol L−1)
[M]0/[I]0
convb (%)
Mn,theoc (kg mol−1)
Mn,MALSd (kg mol−1)
Đd
PCPBIB(53) PCPBIB(61) PCPBIB(63) PCPBIB(68) PCPBIB(71) PCPBIB(95)
2.05 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25
75 100 100 100 100 150
68.6 62.3 64.4 71.3 71.5 65.5
12.0 14.5 15.0 16.6 16.7 22.9
12.4 14.2 14.6 15.9 16.6 22.1
1.17 1.22 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.23
transe (%)
Mn,NMRf (kg mol−1)
83.0 83.3
17.0 17.7
Polymerizations were conducted using G1 in THF at 50 °C for 5 min and then 0 °C for 5 h. bConversion determined by 1H NMR. cTheoretical molar mass based on monomer-to-catalyst ratio ([M]0/[I]0) and corrected for conversion. dNumber-average molar mass and dispersity determined by MALS-SEC (dn/dc = 0.090 mL g−1). eBackbone trans-olefin percent determined by inverse gated decoupling 13C NMR. fDetermined by 1H NMR end group analysis. a
through two commonly used methods. Determination of Nsc,NMR via 1H NMR was accomplished by integration comparison between the aromatic signals (δ = 6.5−7.5 ppm, 5H/PS repeating unit) to the backbone olefin hydrogens (δ = 5.21 ppm, 2H/PCPBIB repeating unit). 1H NMR was also used to determine the overall Mn,NMR of each BB through the equation: Mn,NMR = Nbb(FWCPBIB) + (NbbNscFWS), where FWS is the formula weight of styrene (104.15 g mol−1). MALS-SEC traces of each aliquot from ATRP of PCPBIB(63) (Figure 1b, inset) and PCPBIB(61) (Figure S15) show a decrease in retention time of monomodal peaks with increasing Nsc and
ATRP reaction time. Figure 1b illustrates the similarity of Mn,NMR and Mn,MALS and also the disparity of Mn,MALS versus Mn,CCC determined by conventional column calibration (CCC) of PS standards. The increasing error between Mn,MALS and Mn,CCC is a trend traditionally observed for BB systems and a possible indicator that backbone conformation is extending with increasing Nsc.16,97 A representative overlay confirming the 1H NMR spectral transformations from CPBIB to PCPBIB(63) to PCPBIB(63)-g-S(8) is shown in Figure 1c, with notable signals highlighted. Near quantitative grafting efficiency was confirmed by 13C NMR performed before and 1082
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters
PCPBIB(61)-g-S(34) is the fact that one of the PS chainends is attached to the BB and therefore has less influence on the reduction of Tg.94 A notable advantage of the “grafting-from” method is the ability to produce BBCPs or core−shell cylindrical polymers (CSCP) with high overall Nsc.1,11 To illustrate this method for our system, we synthesized a new macroinitiator, PCPBIB(82), and performed sequential ATRP using S followed by methyl methacrylate (MMA) to produce PCPBIB(82)-g-[S(21)-blockMMA(100)] (SI). Figure 3a displays the 1H NMR spectrum
Table 2. ATRP Grafting of Styrene from Select PCPBIB Macroinitiatorsa sample ID
rxn time (h)
Mn,MALSb (kg mol−1)
Mn,NMRc (kg mol−1)
Đb
PCPBIB(63)-g-S(8) PCPBIB(63)-g-S(15) PCPBIB(63)-g-S(21) PCPBIB(63)-g-S(28) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(5) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(10) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(18) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(34) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(44) PCPBIB(61)-g-S(49)
2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 10 12
58.9 102.0 138.5 195.1 48.1 78.9 132.8 227.8 298.0 325.5
67.1 113.0 152.4 198.3 47.5 80.3 123.7 230.2 293.8 319.9
1.30 1.26 1.34 1.28 1.23 1.24 1.26 1.29 1.32 1.29
Polymerizations were conducted at 80 °C at a [S0/BIB0/CuI/CuII/ PMDETA] of [600:1:0.4:0.03:0.8]. bNumber-average molar mass and dispersity determined via MALS-SEC. cDetermined by 1H NMR.
a
after ATRP which reveal a complete shift of the ester carbonyl signal from 171 to 180 ppm (Figure 1d), consistent with the loss of the neighboring bromine. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on PCPBIB(61) and PCPBIB(61)-g-S(49) was performed under argon at a rate of 10 °C min−1 (Figure S15). For PCPBIB, a two-step decomposition is observed. At ∼215 °C, a loss of ∼70% w/ w is equivalent to the loss of BIB functionality and consistent with previous literature.98 After grafting, the first decomposition step is much less prominent (∼3% w/w) and the second decomposition step occurs at an onset temperature of ∼340 °C, consistent with PS degradation. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of PCPBIB(61) and grafted samples in Table 2, taken upon the second heating at 10 °C min−1, are shown in Figure 2. PCPBIB(61) has a midpoint Tg
Figure 3. PCPBIB(82)-g-[S(21)-b-MMA(100)] characterized by (a) 1 H NMR with relevant signals annotated and normalized SEC traces (top right inset) before and after each sequential grafting step and (b) AFM height images showing a zoomed inset (top right) and cartoon representation of the core−shell BBCP morphology (top left).
Figure 2. Stacked DSC thermograms of PCPBIB(61) and the grafted samples in Table 2 (rate = 10 °C min−1, 2nd heating, exo down). Triangles annotate the midpoint Tg values.
showing the presence of PMMA signals after ATRP with an inset of SEC traces before and after each grafting step. Through 1 H NMR comparative integration with the polypentenamer olefin-H, PS aryl-H, and PMMA−OCH3 signals, we determined the total molar mass to be 1,220 kg mol−1 with Đ = 1.33. Given the large graft molar mass (∼12 kg mol−1), compared to the polypentenamer backbone (∼5.5 kg mol−1), we anticipate this particular architecture to resemble more of a spherical or oval core−shell morphology as depicted in the cartoon on Figure 3b. Atom force microscopy revealed ring-like structures of approximately 30−40 nm in diameter
= 4 °C, which further demonstrates the flexibility of the polypentenamer backbone. As Nsc is increased, a sharp increase in Tg is also observed, which eventually plateaus at ∼97 °C for Nsc = 34 and 44. This suggests the mobility of the BB system quickly becomes dominated by the movement of the side chains (Tg,PS ≈ 100 °C).99 Interestingly, linear PS with N ≈ 34 is unentangled and would be predicted to have a reduced Tg ≈ 75 °C.100 One rationalization for the increased Tg of 1083
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters
(8) Shi, Y.; Cao, X.; Gao, H. The use of azide-alkyne click chemistry in recent syntheses and applications of polytriazole-based nanostructured polymers. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 4864−4881. (9) Paturej, J.; Sheiko, S. S.; Panyukov, S.; Rubinstein, M. Molecular structure of bottlebrush polymers in melts. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1601478. (10) Müllner, M.; Müller, A. H. E. Cylindrical polymer brushes − Anisotropic building blocks, unimolecular templates and particulate nanocarriers. Polymer 2016, 98, 389−401. (11) Verduzco, R.; Li, X.; Pesek, S. L.; Stein, G. E. Structure, function, self-assembly, and applications of bottlebrush copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2405−2420. (12) Rzayev, J. Molecular Bottlebrushes: New Opportunities in Nanomaterials Fabrication. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 1146−1149. (13) Feng, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Hu, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, X. Welldefined graft copolymers: from controlled synthesis to multipurpose applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1282−1295. (14) Lee, H.-i.; Pietrasik, J.; Sheiko, S. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Stimuliresponsive molecular brushes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 24−44. (15) Peleshanko, S.; Tsukruk, V. V. The architectures and surface behavior of highly branched molecules. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 523−580. (16) Sumerlin, B. S.; Neugebauer, D.; Matyjaszewski, K. Initiation Efficiency in the Synthesis of Molecular Brushes by Grafting from via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 702−708. (17) Zhang, M.; Müller, A. H. E. Cylindrical polymer brushes. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 3461−3481. (18) Hadjichristidis, N.; Pitsikalis, M.; Iatrou, H.; Pispas, S. The Strength of the Macromonomer Strategy for Complex Macromolecular Architecture: Molecular Characterization, Properties and Applications of Polymacromonomers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003, 24, 979−1013. (19) Vatankhah-Varnosfaderani, M.; Keith, A. N.; Cong, Y.; Liang, H.; Rosenthal, M.; Sztucki, M.; Clair, C.; Magonov, S.; Ivanov, D. A.; Dobrynin, A. V.; Sheiko, S. S. Chameleon-like elastomers with molecularly encoded strain-adaptive stiffening and coloration. Science 2018, 359, 1509−1513. (20) Sun, G.; Cho, S.; Clark, C.; Verkhoturov, S. V.; Eller, M. J.; Li, A.; Pavía-Jiménez, A.; Schweikert, E. A.; Thackeray, J. W.; Trefonas, P.; Wooley, K. L. Nanoscopic Cylindrical Dual Concentric and Lengthwise Block Brush Terpolymers as Covalent Preassembled High-Resolution and High-Sensitivity Negative-Tone Photoresist Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4203−4206. (21) Bolton, J.; Bailey, T. S.; Rzayev, J. Large Pore Size Nanoporous Materials from the Self-Assembly of Asymmetric Bottlebrush Block Copolymers. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 998−1001. (22) Johnson, J. A.; Lu, Y. Y.; Burts, A. O.; Lim, Y.-H.; Finn, M. G.; Koberstein, J. T.; Turro, N. J.; Tirrell, D. A.; Grubbs, R. H. CoreClickable PEG-Branch-Azide Bivalent-Bottle-Brush Polymers by ROMP: Grafting-Through and Clicking-To. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 559−566. (23) Li, X.; Prukop, S. L.; Biswal, S. L.; Verduzco, R. Surface Properties of Bottlebrush Polymer Thin Films. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 7118−7127. (24) Daniel, W. F. M.; Xie, G.; Vatankhah Varnoosfaderani, M.; Burdyńska, J.; Li, Q.; Nykypanchuk, D.; Gang, O.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Sheiko, S. S. Bottlebrush-Guided Polymer Crystallization Resulting in Supersoft and Reversibly Moldable Physical Networks. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 2103−2111. (25) Slegeris, R.; Ondrusek, B. A.; Chung, H. Catechol- and ketonecontaining multifunctional bottlebrush polymers for oxime ligation and hydrogel formation. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 4707−4715. (26) Daniel, W. F. M.; Burdynska, J.; Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani, M.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Paturej, J.; Rubinstein, M.; Dobrynin, A. V.; Sheiko, S. S. Solvent-free, supersoft and superelastic bottlebrush melts and networks. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 183−189. (27) Bates, C. M.; Chang, A. B.; Momčilović, N.; Jones, S. C.; Grubbs, R. H. ABA Triblock Brush Polymers: Synthesis, Self-
consistent with the size and predicted morphology of this sample. In conclusion, we report a unique polypentenamer BB system that allows control over Nbb, Nsc and block copolymer grafts with a high degree of control and versatility. This new BB system, having a much more flexible backbone, has the opportunity to elucidate how much the PNB backbone is contributing to the rigidity of these systems and continue our understanding of BB structure−property relationships for the ng = 4 topology. Such investigations are currently underway.
■
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information *
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576.
■
Additional experimental details, procedures, calculations, NMR, SEC, TGA, and AFM data (PDF).
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail:
[email protected]. ORCID
Justin G. Kennemur: 0000-0002-2322-0386 Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
■
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1750852. We also thank the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (55378-DNI7) and the Florida State University Materials and Energy Hiring Initiative for partial support of this research. GC-EI/MS data was provided by the University of Florida Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center funded by NIH S10 OD021758-01A1. The authors acknowledge Dr. Banghao Chen and the FSU NMR Facility for guidance and support and Prof. Albert Stiegman for use of the DSC instrument.
■
REFERENCES
(1) Sheiko, S. S.; Sumerlin, B. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Cylindrical molecular brushes: Synthesis, characterization, and properties. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 759−785. (2) Iozzo, R. V.; Schaefer, L. Proteoglycan form and function: A comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015, 42, 11−55. (3) Couchman, J. R.; Pataki, C. A. An Introduction to Proteoglycans and Their Localization. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 885−897. (4) Khalsa, P. S.; Eisenberg, S. R. Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure. J. Biomech. 1997, 30, 589−594. (5) Sophia Fox, A. J.; Bedi, A.; Rodeo, S. A. The Basic Science of Articular Cartilage: Structure, Composition, and Function. Sports Health 2009, 1, 461−468. (6) Polymeropoulos, G.; Zapsas, G.; Ntetsikas, K.; Bilalis, P.; Gnanou, Y.; Hadjichristidis, N. 50th Anniversary Perspective: Polymers with Complex Architectures. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 1253−1290. (7) Liberman-Martin, A. L.; Chu, C. K.; Grubbs, R. H. Application of Bottlebrush Block Copolymers as Photonic Crystals. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1700058. 1084
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters Assembly, Conductivity, and Rheological Properties. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 4967−4973. (28) Xu, H.; Sun, F. C.; Shirvanyants, D. G.; Rubinstein, M.; Shabratov, D.; Beers, K. L.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Sheiko, S. S. Molecular Pressure Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2930−2934. (29) Liang, H.; Cao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Sheiko, S. S.; Dobrynin, A. V. Combs and Bottlebrushes in a Melt. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 3430− 3437. (30) Hatanaka, Y.; Nakamura, Y. Dilute solution properties of polymacromonomer consisting of polybutadiene backbone and polystyrene side chains. Polymer 2013, 54, 1538−1542. (31) Saariaho, M.; Szleifer, I.; Ikkala, O.; ten Brinke, G. Extended conformations of isolated molecular bottle-brushes: Influence of sidechain topology. Macromol. Theory Simul. 1998, 7, 211−216. (32) Haugan, I. N.; Maher, M. J.; Chang, A. B.; Lin, T.-P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Bates, F. S. Consequences of Grafting Density on the Linear Viscoelastic Behavior of Graft Polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 525−530. (33) Lin, T.-P.; Chang, A. B.; Luo, S.-X.; Chen, H.-Y.; Lee, B.; Grubbs, R. H. Effects of Grafting Density on Block Polymer SelfAssembly: From Linear to Bottlebrush. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 11632− 11641. (34) Chang, A. B.; Bates, C. M.; Lee, B.; Garland, C. M.; Jones, S. C.; Spencer, R. K. W.; Matsen, M. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Manipulating the ABCs of self-assembly via low-χ block polymer design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 6462−6467. (35) Abbasi, M.; Faust, L.; Riazi, K.; Wilhelm, M. Linear and Extensional Rheology of Model Branched Polystyrenes: From Loosely Grafted Combs to Bottlebrushes. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5964− 5977. (36) Zhang, J.; Schneiderman, D. K.; Li, T.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Bates, F. S. Design of Graft Block Polymer Thermoplastics. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 9108−9118. (37) López-Barrón, C. R.; Brant, P.; Eberle, A. P. R.; Crowther, D. J. Linear rheology and structure of molecular bottlebrushes with short side chains. J. Rheol. 2015, 59, 865−883. (38) Dalsin, S. J.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Bates, F. S. Linear Rheology of Polyolefin-Based Bottlebrush Polymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 4680−4691. (39) Pesek, S. L.; Li, X.; Hammouda, B.; Hong, K.; Verduzco, R. Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Analysis of Bottlebrush Polymers Prepared via Grafting-Through Polymerization. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6998−7005. (40) Hu, M.; Xia, Y.; McKenna, G. B.; Kornfield, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. Linear Rheological Response of a Series of Densely Branched Brush Polymers. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 6935−6943. (41) Maughon, B. R.; Weck, M.; Mohr, B.; Grubbs, R. H. Influence of Backbone Rigidity on the Thermotropic Behavior of Side-Chain Liquid Crystalline Polymers Synthesized by Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 257−265. (42) Saariaho, M.; Subbotin, A.; Ikkala, O.; ten Brinke, G. Comb copolymer cylindrical brushes containing semiflexible side chains: a Monte Carlo study. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21, 110−115. (43) Paturej, J.; Kreer, T. Hierarchical excluded volume screening in solutions of bottlebrush polymers. Soft Matter 2017, 13, 8534−8541. (44) Dalsin, S. J.; Rions-Maehren, T. G.; Beam, M. D.; Bates, F. S.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Matsen, M. W. Bottlebrush Block Polymers: Quantitative Theory and Experiments. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 12233− 12245. (45) Jeong, S. H.; Kim, J. M.; Baig, C. Rheological Influence of Short-Chain Branching for Polymeric Materials under Shear with Variable Branch Density and Branching Architecture. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4491−4500. (46) Liang, H.; Sheiko, S. S.; Dobrynin, A. V. Supersoft and Hyperelastic Polymer Networks with Brushlike Strands. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 638−645. (47) Huang, K.; Rzayev, J. Well-Defined Organic Nanotubes from Multicomponent Bottlebrush Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6880−6885.
(48) Beers, K. L.; Gaynor, S. G.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Sheiko, S. S.; Möller, M. The Synthesis of Densely Grafted Copolymers by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 9413− 9415. (49) Wintermantel, M.; Gerle, M.; Fischer, K.; Schmidt, M.; Wataoka, I.; Urakawa, H.; Kajiwara, K.; Tsukahara, Y. Molecular Bottlebrushes. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 978−983. (50) Tsukahara, Y.; Kohjiya, S.; Tsutsumi, K.; Okamoto, Y. On the Intrinsic Viscosity of Poly(macromonomer)s. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 1662−1664. (51) Inoue, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Nakamura, Y. Dilute Solution Properties of a Polymacromonomer Consisting of a Polystyrene Main Chain with Polyisoprene Side Chains. Relation of Molecular Parameters to Polymer Segment Interactions. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 8664−8670. (52) Sugiyama, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Norisuye, T. Dilute-Solution Properties of Polystyrene Polymacromonomer Having Side Chains of over 100 Monomeric Units. Polym. J. 2008, 40, 109. (53) Sarapas, J. M.; Chan, E. P.; Rettner, E. M.; Beers, K. L. Compressing and Swelling To Study the Structure of Extremely Soft Bottlebrush Networks Prepared by ROMP. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 2359−2366. (54) Radzinski, S. C.; Foster, J. C.; Scannelli, S. J.; Weaver, J. R.; Arrington, K. J.; Matson, J. B. Tapered Bottlebrush Polymers: ConeShaped Nanostructures by Sequential Addition of Macromonomers. ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 1175−1179. (55) Gai, Y.; Song, D.-P.; Yavitt, B. M.; Watkins, J. J. Polystyreneblock-poly(ethylene oxide) Bottlebrush Block Copolymer Morphology Transitions: Influence of Side Chain Length and Volume Fraction. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 1503−1511. (56) Pesek, S. L.; Xiang, Q.; Hammouda, B.; Verduzco, R. Smallangle neutron scattering analysis of bottlebrush backbone and side chain flexibility. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2017, 55, 104−111. (57) Kawamoto, K.; Zhong, M.; Gadelrab, K. R.; Cheng, L.-C.; Ross, C. A.; Alexander-Katz, A.; Johnson, J. A. Graft-through Synthesis and Assembly of Janus Bottlebrush Polymers from A-Branch-B Diblock Macromonomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11501−11504. (58) Radzinski, S. C.; Foster, J. C.; Chapleski, R. C.; Troya, D.; Matson, J. B. Bottlebrush Polymer Synthesis by Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization: The Significance of the Anchor Group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6998−7004. (59) Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Uhrig, D.; Lu, X.; Keum, J. K.; Mays, J. W.; Hong, K. Fluorinated bottlebrush polymers based on poly(trifluoroethyl methacrylate): synthesis and characterization. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 680−688. (60) Dalsin, S. J.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Bates, F. S. Molecular Weight Dependence of Zero-Shear Viscosity in Atactic Polypropylene Bottlebrush Polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 423−427. (61) Auriemma, F.; De Rosa, C.; Di Girolamo, R.; Silvestre, A.; Anderson-Wile, A. M.; Coates, G. W. Small Angle X-ray Scattering Investigation of Norbornene-Terminated Syndiotactic Polypropylene and Corresponding Comb-Like Poly(macromonomer). J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 10320−10333. (62) Miyake, G. M.; Weitekamp, R. A.; Piunova, V. A.; Grubbs, R. H. Synthesis of Isocyanate-Based Brush Block Copolymers and Their Rapid Self-Assembly to Infrared-Reflecting Photonic Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14249−14254. (63) Xia, Y.; Kornfield, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. Efficient Synthesis of Narrowly Dispersed Brush Polymers via Living Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Macromonomers. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 3761−3766. (64) Xia, Y.; Olsen, B. D.; Kornfield, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. Efficient Synthesis of Narrowly Dispersed Brush Copolymers and Study of Their Assemblies: The Importance of Side Chain Arrangement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18525−18532. (65) Cheng, C.; Khoshdel, E.; Wooley, K. L. ATRP from a Norbornenyl-Functionalized Initiator: Balancing of Complementary Reactivity for the Preparation of α-Norbornenyl Macromonomers/ωHaloalkyl Macroinitiators. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 9455−9465. 1085
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086
Letter
ACS Macro Letters (66) Jha, S.; Dutta, S.; Bowden, N. B. Synthesis of Ultralarge Molecular Weight Bottlebrush Polymers Using Grubbs’ Catalysts. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 4365−4374. (67) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Williams, J. E.; Blanchard, K. R. Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2377−2386. (68) Bielawski, C. W.; Benitez, D.; Morita, T.; Grubbs, R. H. Synthesis of End-Functionalized Poly(norbornene)s via Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 8610−8618. (69) Herz, K.; Imbrich, D. A.; Unold, J.; Xu, G. J.; Speiser, M.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Functional ROMP-Derived Poly(cyclopentene)s. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 1522−1527. (70) Asrar, J. Metathesis polymerization of N-phenylnorbornenedicarboximide. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 5150−5156. (71) Neary, W. J.; Kennemur, J. G. A Precision Ethylene-Styrene Copolymer with High Styrene Content from Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization of 4-Phenylcyclopentene. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 975−979. (72) Kieber, R. J.; Neary, W. J.; Kennemur, J. G. Viscoelastic, Mechanical, and Glasstomeric Properties of Precision Polyolefins Containing a Phenyl Branch at Every Five Carbons. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 4916. (73) Tuba, R.; Grubbs, R. H. Ruthenium catalyzed equilibrium ringopening metathesis polymerization of cyclopentene. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 3959−3962. (74) Liu, H.; Nelson, A. Z.; Ren, Y.; Yang, K.; Ewoldt, R. H.; Moore, J. S. Dynamic Remodeling of Covalent Networks via Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 933−937. (75) Chaimongkolkunasin, S.; Nomura, K. Arylimido)Vanadium(V)-Alkylidenes Containing Chlorinated Phenoxy Ligands: Thermally Robust, Highly Active Catalyst in Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Cyclic Olefins. Organometallics 2018, 37, 2064−2074. (76) Brits, S.; Neary, W. J.; Palui, G.; Kennemur, J. G. A new echelon of precision polypentenamers: highly isotactic branching on every five carbons. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 1719. (77) Neary, W. J.; Kennemur, J. G. Variable Temperature ROMP: Leveraging Low Ring Strain Thermodynamics To Achieve WellDefined Polypentenamers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4935−4941. (78) Mulhearn, W. D.; Register, R. A. Synthesis of NarrowDistribution, High-Molecular-Weight ROMP Polycyclopentene via Suppression of Acyclic Metathesis Side Reactions. ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 112−116. (79) Hlil, A. R.; Balogh, J.; Moncho, S.; Su, H.-L.; Tuba, R.; Brothers, E. N.; Al-Hashimi, M.; Bazzi, H. S. Ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of five- to eight-membered cyclic olefins: Computational, thermodynamic, and experimental approach. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 3137−3145. (80) Song, S.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Synthesis of functional polyolefins via ring-opening metathesis polymerization of esterfunctionalized cyclopentene and its copolymerization with cyclic comonomers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 5924−5933. (81) Song, S.; Xing, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Functional polyethylene with regularly distributed ester pendants via ringopening metathesis polymerization of ester functionalized cyclopentene: Synthesis and characterization. Polymer 2017, 129, 135−143. (82) Song, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Synthesis and characterization of functional polyethylene with regularly distributed thioester pendants via ring-opening metathesis polymerization. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 4027−4036. (83) Hou, X.; Nomura, K. Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Cyclic Olefins by (Arylimido)vanadium(V)-Alkylidenes: Highly Active, Thermally Robust Cis Specific Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11840−11849. (84) Al-Hashimi, M.; Tuba, R.; Bazzi, H. S.; Grubbs, R. H. Synthesis of Polypentenamer and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) with a Phase-Separable Polyisobutylene-Supported Second-Generation Hoveyda-Grubbs Catalyst. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 228−233. (85) Mugemana, C.; Bukhryakov, K. V.; Bertrand, O.; Vu, K. B.; Gohy, J.-F.; Hadjichristidis, N.; Rodionov, V. O. Ring opening
metathesis polymerization of cyclopentene using a ruthenium catalyst confined by a branched polymer architecture. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 2923−2928. (86) Tuba, R.; Balogh, J.; Hlil, A.; Barłóg, M.; Al-Hashimi, M.; Bazzi, H. S. Synthesis of Recyclable Tire Additives via Equilibrium RingOpening Metathesis Polymerization. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 6090−6094. (87) Tuba, R.; Al-Hashimi, M.; Bazzi, H. S.; Grubbs, R. H. One-Pot Synthesis of Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) Copolymers via Ruthenium Catalyzed Equilibrium Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Hydroxyl Functionalized Cyclopentene. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 8190−8195. (88) Zohrabi-Kalantari, V.; Wilde, F.; Grunert, R.; Bednarski, P. J.; Link, A. 4-Aminocyclopentane-1,3-diols as platforms for diversity: synthesis of a screening library. MedChemComm 2014, 5, 203−213. (89) Kennemur, J. G.; Yao, L.; Bates, F. S.; Hillmyer, M. A. Sub-5 nm Domains in Ordered Poly(cyclohexylethylene)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) Block Polymers for Lithography. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1411−1418. (90) Matyjaszewski, K. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP): Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 4015−4039. (91) Matyjaszewski, K.; Tsarevsky, N. V. Nanostructured functional materials prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 276. (92) Braunecker, W. A.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/living radical polymerization: Features, developments, and perspectives. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 93−146. (93) Ivin, K. J.; Mol, J. C. Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis Polymerization; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1997. (94) Hiemenz, P. C.; Lodge, T. Polymer Chemistry, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2007. (95) Jung, M. E.; Piizzi, G. gem-Disubstituent Effect: Theoretical Basis and Synthetic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1735−1766. (96) Bachrach, S. M. The gem-Dimethyl Effect Revisited. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2466−2468. (97) Podzimek, S.; Vlcek, T. Characterization of branched polymers by SEC coupled with a multiangle light scattering detector. II. Data processing and interpretation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 82, 454−460. (98) Savoji, M. T.; Zhao, D.; Muisener, R. J.; Schimossek, K.; Schoeller, K.; Lodge, T. P.; Hillmyer, M. A. Poly(alkyl methacrylate)Grafted Polyolefins as Viscosity Modifiers for Engine Oil: A New Mechanism for Improved Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 1840−1850. (99) Brandrup, J.; Immergut, E. H.; Grulke, E. A. Polymer Handbook, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York; Chichester, 2004. (100) Fox, T. G.; Flory, P. J. The glass temperature and related properties of polystyrene. Influence of molecular weight. J. Polym. Sci. 1954, 14, 315−319.
1086
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00576 ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1080−1086