Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
Genetic Engineering of Maize (Zea mays L.) with Improved Grain Nutrients Xiaotong Guo, Xiaoguang Duan, Yongzhen Wu, Jieshan Cheng, Juan Zhang, Hongxia Zhang, and Bei Li J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05390 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Feb 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 4, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Title: Genetic Engineering of Maize (Zea mays L.) with Improved Grain Nutrients
Xiaotong Guo,1,# Xiaoguang Duan,2,# Yongzhen Wu,1 Jieshan Cheng,1 Juan Zhang,1 Hongxia Zhang,1 and Bei Li,1,*
1
College of Agriculture,
Ludong University, 186 Hongqizhong Road, Yantai, China 264025
2
School of Life Science and Technology,
ShanghaiTech University, 393 Middle Huaxia Road, Pudong, Shanghai, 201210
*Corresponding author: Bei Li Email:
[email protected] Phone: 86-0535-6664662;
#
These authors contribute equally to this work.
1
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2
ABSTRACT
3 4
Cell wall invertase plays important roles in the grain filling of crop
5
plants. However, its functions in the improvement of grain nutrients are
6
not investigated. In this work, the stable expression of cell wall invertase
7
encoding genes from different plant species, and the contents of total
8
starch, protein, amino acid, nitrogen, lipid and phosphorus were
9
examined in transgenic maize plants. High expression of cell wall
10
invertase gene conferred enhanced invertase activity and sugar content
11
on transgenic plants, leading to increased grain yield and improved grain
12
nutrients. Transgenic plants with high expression of transgene produced
13
more total starch, protein, nitrogen, and essential amino acids in the
14
seeds. Overall, the results indicate that cell wall invertase gene can be
15
used as a potential candidate for the genetic breeding of grain crops with
16
both improved grain yield and quality.
17 18
KEYWORDS: invertase, transgenic plants, grain, nutrient, maize
19
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 37
Page 3 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20
INTRODUCTION
21
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important crop plant grown worldwide for
22
food, forage, energy and industrial materials. For grain crops, the
23
agronomic traits of grain number and weight, which determine the grain
24
yield per plant, are determined by genetic, physiological and
25
environmental factors.1 In addition to the conventional breeding
26
approach to improve the yield of crop plants, genetic engineering is a
27
more efficient way to generate new cultivars with improved agronomic
28
traits for a wider range of applications.
29
Cell wall invertase plays a crucial role in plant growth and
30
development, especially in the grain filling of crop plants.2-5 In rice
31
(Oryza sativa), four cell wall invertase encoding genes were observed to
32
be expressed in immature seeds and were proposed to have an important
33
function during the early developmental stages of the grain filling
34
phase.6 Overexpression of the cell wall invertase gene OsGIF1, under
35
the control of its own promoter, increased grain size and weight.7 Further
36
study revealed that OsGIF1 also functions in pre-existing and induced
37
defence.8 In soybean, suppressing the expression of invertase inhibitor
38
genes improved the weight and accumulations of hexoses, starch, and
39
protein of mature seeds in transgenic plants.9 In bamboo, three invertase
40
encoding genes were found to have individual roles in the adaption of
41
the plant to environmental changes.10 In tomato, silencing inhibitory 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
42
protein of the endogenous cell wall invertase gene significantly
43
increased seed weight and fruit sugar hexoses.11 In maize, constitutive
44
expression of the cell wall invertase encoding genes from Arabidopsis,
45
rice and maize, under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV)
46
35S promoter, all improved grain yield in transgenic plants.12 However,
47
to improve the grain’s nutritional quality, genetic improvement in both
48
grain yield and nitrogen concentration is necessary.13 Biofortified staple
49
crops such as rice, maize and wheat harboring essential micronutrients,
50
as well as new crop varieties having ability to combat chronic disease,
51
are under development.14 As a major source of food and animal feed, as
52
well as one of the world’s three major cereal crops (along with rice and
53
wheat), maize is deficient in lysine,15 a necessary amino acid for health
54
maintenance.16 Therefore, breeding high yield cultivar with high grain
55
nitrogen concentration is important for improving the nutritional quality
56
of maize.13 Recent advances in plant genetic engineering have provided
57
new opportunities to improve lysine content in maize.17-20
58
Although the function of cell wall invertase in increasing grain size
59
and weight has been well studied, its possible role in grain quality
60
improvement still remains unknown. To assess the potential of cell wall
61
invertase in the breeding of new crop varieties with increased grain
62
nutrients, transgenic maize plants constitutively expressing the cell wall
63
invertase gene from Arabidopsis, rice and maize, generated in our 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 37
Page 5 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
12
64
previous study,
were continuously grown in the field for six
65
generations, and the contents of starch, lipid and protein in the seeds of
66
transgenic plants were investigated in this study.
67 68
MATERIALS AND METHODS
69
Plant Materials. Previously, we isolated the cell wall invertase genes
70
from Arabidopsis, rice and maize, and respectively introduced them into
71
the maize inbred line Ye478.12 Four individual transgenic lines, which
72
showed different expression levels of each transgene, were selected (A1,
73
A3, A4 and A5, transgenic lines AtGIF1-1, AtGIF1-3, AtGIF1-4 and
74
AtGIF1-5 for transgene AtGIF1 from Arabidopsis; O1, O3, O4 and O6,
75
transgenic lines OstGIF1-1, OsGIF1-3, OsGIF1-4 and OsGIF1-6 for
76
transgene OstGIF1 from rice; Zm1, Zm2, Zm3 and Zm4, transgenic
77
lines ZmGIF1-1, ZmGIF1-2, ZmGIF1-3 and ZmGIF1-4 for transgene
78
ZmGIF1 from maize). In the present study, two transgenic lines, which
79
showed the highest expression level of each transgene, were selected for
80
grain nutrient examinations (A3, A4, O1, O4, Zm1 and Zm3).
81
Field Trials. Wild type (WT) Ye478 and different transgenic lines (T6
82
generation) were grown in field on Wuse Farm of Shanghai (Shanghai,
83
China) in May 2016. Trial plots were arranged in a random complete
84
block design with three replications. Forty seeds of WT and each
85
transgenic line were sown in a double row plot. The plot was 2.5 m in 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
86
length and 1.2 m in width, with an interval of 0.25 m between plants.
87
Plants were thinned at five-leaf-stage, leaving 20 plants in each plot (a
88
population density of approximately 66700 plants/ha). Plants at
89
flowering stage were self-pollinated. Mature ears were harvested, dried
90
and weighed to determine the yield (dry weight). Cobs and kernels were
91
collected to take pictures. Ear length and weight, grain number per row,
92
100-grain-weight, total protein, N, amino acid content, as well as total
93
phosphorus (P), lipid and starch content of thirty randomly selected ears
94
from each plot were measured.
95
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analyses. To
96
confirm the stable expression of transgenes, quantitative real-time PCR
97
(qRT-PCR) was performed with RNA samples isolated from the 4th fully
98
expanded leaves of field grown WT and transgenic plants at
99
five-leaf-stage. Wild type plants segregated from transgenic lines
100
AtGIF1-1, OsGIF1-1 and ZmGIF1-1, respectively, were used as control.
101
Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) and
102
the first-strand cDNA was synthesized with HiScriptIIQ RT SuperMix
103
for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, Shanghai, China). PCR was
104
performed with 96-well optical reaction plates by iQ5 (Bio-Rad,
105
Richmond, CA, USA) after pre-incubation for 3 min at 95°C, followed
106
by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 10 s,
107
and extension at 72°C for 20 s. Amplification of the detected genes was 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 37
Page 7 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
monitored every cycle using SYBR green fluorescence. All experiments
109
were carried out using the iQ5 real-time PCR detection system and
110
AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Shanghai, China). Fold
111
changes of RNA transcripts were calculated by the ∆Ct method [Ct
112
(GIF1) – Ct (actin1)] with maize actin1 as an internal control. Each
113
experiment was repeated three times. Gene specific primers used in this
114
study are
AtGIF1-F
115
AtGIF1-R
(5’-CGGATCAGTCCAACTTGGTT-3’)
116
AtGIF1,
117
OsGIF1-R
118
OsGIF1,
119
ZmGIF1-R
120
ZmGIF1, actin1-F (5’-ATCACCATTGGGTCAGAAAGG-3’ ) and
121
actin1-R (5’-GTGCTGAGAGAAGCCAAAATAGAG-3’) for actin1.
122
Sugar Content Determination and Invertase Activity Assays. Seeds
123
of wild type (segregated from transgenic line ZmGIF1-1) and
124
homozygous transgenic lines (T6) were sown in 28×28 cm (diameter
125
×depth) pots filled with homogeneous loam, and grown under 14 h of
126
light/10 h of dark cycles in green house at 32°C (light) or 22°C (dark)
127
with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 700 µmol/m2/s, and a
128
relative humidity of 50-60%. Shoots were thinned to two plants per pot
129
at three-leaf-stage. At five-leaf-stage, the 4th fully expanded leaves were
OsGIF1-F
(5’-TAATTCAGTGGCCGGTTAGG-3’)
transgene
(5’-CTCTGAGGAGCCTGATCGAC-3’)
(5’-AGGCTCCATTCATCATGACC-3’) ZmGIF1-F
for
for
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
for
and
transgene
(5’-GAACGGCAAGATATCCCTGA-3’)
(5’-CATGACCGGCTTCTTCATCT-3’)
and
and
transgene
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
130
collected for sugar contents determination and invertase activity assays.
131
Sugar contents were determined as described previously.21 For invertase
132
activity analyses, leaves were ground in extraction buffer and
133
centrifuged at 12 000 g for 10 min. The pellet was washed twice and
134
re-suspended in extraction buffer as described previously.22
135
Total Starch and Amylose Content Analyses. Thirty dried kernels of
136
wild type (segregated from transgenic line ZmGIF1-1) and each
137
transgenic lines harvested from Wuse Farm in Shanghai (Shanghai,
138
China) in 2016 (T7 generation) were boiled for 3 min to peel off the seed
139
coat. Embryo was removed from endosperm, and the remaining parts of
140
seeds were dried to constant weight at 45°C. Then, the dried endosperm
141
was ground into fine powder. The precipitate was collected after soluble
142
sugar extraction and was washed three times with 80% EtOH. Starch
143
content was determined with the total starch kit following the
144
manufacturer’s instruction (Megazyme International Ireland Limited,
145
Wicklow, Ireland).
146
Amylose content in starch was determined using a col-orimetric
147
amylose content assay as described previously.23 Potato amylose (A0512;
148
sigma-aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and amylopectin (10118;
149
sigma-aldrich) were used as standard samples to establish the standard
150
curves. The iodine affinity of starches was determined through
151
potentiometric autotitrator (Metrohm 907Titrando, Herisau, Switzerland) 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 37
Page 9 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
152
as described by Schoch.24 Amylose content was also analyzed using the
153
GPC-RI system developed by Park and his colleagues.25
154
The dried kernels of wild type (segregated from transgenic line
155
ZmGIF1-1) and each transgenic lines harvested in 2016 (T7 generation)
156
were steeped in 0.14% NaHSO3 for 36 h at 52°C, and then ground and
157
dried for the assay. Each starch sample (4 mg) was mixed with 4 ml
158
DMSO and stirred in a boiling water bath for 24 h. The sample was
159
filtered through 2 µm pore size filter and then injected into a PL-GPC
160
220 instrument (Polymer Laboratories, Inc., Amherst, MA, USA) with
161
three Phenogel columns (Phenomenex, Inc., Tor-rance, CA, USA), a
162
guard column (Phenomenex, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) and a differential
163
refractive index detector. The eluent system with DMSO containing 0.5
164
mM NaNO3 was used at a flow rate of 0.8 ml min−1. The column oven
165
temperature was controlled at 80°C. For molecular weight (MW)
166
calibration, standard dextrans (American Polymer Standards Co., Mentor,
167
OH, USA) with different MW were used.26
168
Total Protein and Nitrogen Content Analyses. Endosperm and all
169
samples were treated at 105°C for 30 min, dried at 70°C to a constant
170
weight, and then weighed to obtain the dry weight (DW).27 Dried
171
samples were then ground into fine powder. Total N content was
172
determined as described previously using an amount of 0.5 g powder.28
173
For total protein content analyses, an amount of 0.5 g ground power 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 37
174
were measured as described previously.29
175
Amino Acid Assays. For amino acid analyses, a total amount of 20 mg
176
fine powder (same batch as used for total protein and nitrogen content
177
analyses) was hyrolyzed in 1 ml of 6 M HCl for 24h at 105°C. After
178
centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min, 100 µl liquid supernatant was
179
decanted and dried in vacuum, and then dissolved in 1 ml of 0.1 N HCl.
180
After centrifugation as described previously, 1 µl supernatant was
181
separated by analytical column ZORBAX Eclipse-AAA (Agilent, 5 µm,
182
4.6 × 250 mm) and analyzed using HPLC-UV System (1260, Agilent
183
Technologies, USA) which was detected with ultraviolet detector at
184
262nm and 338nm. And the limit of detection is 1 pmol. The A phase is
185
40 mM Na2HPO4 (PH 7.8) and the B phase is acetonitrile: methanol:
186
water (45:45:10, v/v). The flow rate was set at 2 ml/min and the column
187
temperature was set at 40°C. Standard samples were purchased from
188
sigma-aldrich (LAA21).
189
Determination of Phosphorus and Lipid Contents. Dried kernels were
190
heated at 105°C for 30 min, dried to a constant weight at 75°C and
191
ground into fine powder. An amount of 0.5 g fine powder was digested
192
with a modified Kjeldahl procedure using H2SO4+ H2O2 as catalyst,
193
and analyzed for phosphorus concentration by automated colorimetry
194
using the molybdovanadate method.31
195
Lipid
content
was
analyzed
by
near-infrared
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
30
reflectance
Page 11 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
196
spectroscopy (NIRS) on a VECTOR22/N as described previously
197
(Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).32
198
Statistical Analysis. ANOVA methodology or Student’s t-test was used
199
for data analyses. Differences in value means were compared according
200
to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. Values of 0.01 < P < 0.05 or P