A Novel Propane Monooxygenase Initiating Degradation of 1,4

Dec 1, 2017 - In this study, we deciphered the essential catalytic role of a novel propane MO (encoded by the prmABCD gene cluster) in dioxane metabol...
0 downloads 0 Views 715KB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Letter

A Novel Propane Monooxygenase Initiating Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane by Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06 Daiyong Deng, Fei Li, and Mengyan Li Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00504 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 3, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology Letters is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

1

A Novel Propane Monooxygenase Initiating

2

Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane by Mycobacterium

3

dioxanotrophicus PH-06

4 5

Daiyong Deng, Fei Li, Mengyan Li*

6

Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology,

7

Newark, NJ, USA 07102

8 9

*Address correspondence to Dr. Mengyan Li ([email protected])

10

Phone: +1-973-642-7095

11

Fax: +1-973-596-3586

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

12

Page 2 of 21

Abstract

13

Monitored natural attenuation and bioremediation are cost-efficient and environment-

14

friendly approaches to mitigate prevalent 1,4-dioxane (dioxane) plumes. Unfortunately, their field

15

applications have been greatly undermined given our scarce knowledge of the diversity of dioxane

16

biodegradation pathways and associated key enzymes. At present, only tetrahydrofuran

17

monooxygenases (THF MOs) are known to initiate dioxane degradation in dioxane metabolizers.

18

In this study, we deciphered the essential catalytic role of a novel propane MO (encoded by the

19

prmABCD gene cluster) in dioxane metabolism by Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06. This

20

propane MO is phylogenetically distinct from THF MOs based on the low amino acid sequence

21

identities (< 40 % for alpha subunits). Reverse transcription PCR analysis revealed that the

22

prmABCD gene cluster is an intact transcription unit inducible by dioxane, THF, or propane.

23

Further, biotransformation activity of this propane MO towards dioxane, THF, and propane was

24

confirmed using heterologous expression. Detection of 2-hydroxyethoxyacetic acid in the

25

expression clones proves that this propane MO catalyzes dioxane decomposition via α-

26

hydroxylation. This first enzymological identification of the propane MO in PH-06 expands our

27

understanding of dioxane metabolic pathways and unequivocally enables the development of

28

molecular tools to improve the assessment of natural attenuation and bioremediation at dioxane-

29

impacted sites.

30

Keywords:

31

Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06, heterologous expression

1,4-dioxane,

propane

monooxygenase,

soluble

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

di-iron

monooxygenase,

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

prmABCD in Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06

Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2-155

Propane MO

Biomass + CO2

Negative Control

pTip-QC2

pTip-prmABCD

Propane MO Expressing Treatment

32

1,4-Dioxane Concentration

Page 3 of 21

Negative Control

Propane MO Expressing Treatment

Incubation Time

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

33

1. Introduction

34

1,4-Dioxane (dioxane) has emerged as a water contaminant of growing attention1, 2 given

35

its human carcinogenicity3 and prevalent occurrence4, 5. As a stabilizer for chlorinated solvents,

36

particularly 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dioxane has been detected as a frequent co-contaminant at

37

thousands of solvent-contaminated sites.2, 5, 6 Unfortunately, dioxane’s hydrophilic nature and low

38

KOC preclude the effective treatment by adsorption, air stripping, and other conventional

39

approaches.1, 2 Thus, the majority of the ongoing site remediation efforts primarily rely on pump

40

and treat in combination with chemical oxidation processes (e.g., hydrogen peroxide with ozone

41

or UV light).7, 8

42

Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) and bioremediation are among the most economical

43

and eco-friendly treatment alternatives that are particularly suited for mitigating large and dilute

44

dioxane plumes.9 A recent data mining study provided evidence of dioxane attenuation at a

45

significant number of sites that were investigated based on their historical monitoring records.10

46

Further, occurrence and acclimation of naturally-occurring dioxane degraders at several dioxane-

47

impacted sites have been demonstrated using an array of molecular biological tools, including

48

quantitative PCR (qPCR), microarray, and DGGE.9, 11, 12 However, application and evaluation of

49

MNA and bioremediation have been substantially hurtled by our scare knowledge of the molecular

50

basis of dioxane biodegradation. Therefore, to develop feasible biomarkers and other molecular

51

tools with high specificity and profound monitoring value, it is of significant research priority to

52

untangle enzymes in charge of the key steps of dioxane degradation.

53

In recent years, over ten dioxane degrading bacteria have been isolated.13-21 However,

54

tetrahydrofuran monooxygenases (THF MOs) are so far the only type of bacterial enzymes

55

identified in dioxane metabolizers that can initiate the biodegradation of this compound.22-25 Four

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 21

Page 5 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

56

THF MO-encoded gene clusters (thmADBC) have been reported in the archetypic dioxane

57

degrader, Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans CB119013, 25-27, and three other Pseudonocardia and

58

Rhodococcus species22-24. THF MOs are responsible for inserting a hydroxyl group at the α carbon

59

position of dioxane leading to the subsequent cleavage of the high-energy ether bond (so-called

60

“α-hydroxylation”).25, 28, 29 Based on the phylogenetic analysis, THF MOs belong to a multi-

61

component bacterial enzyme family named as soluble di-iron monooxygenases (SDIMOs).30-32

62

SDIMOs are known for their versatile degradation capabilities and can be divided into six

63

subgroups based on their substrate preference, sequence similarity, and gene component

64

arrangement.31-33 THF MOs are categorized as the group-5 SDIMOs.

65

Recent findings in pure strains16,

34

or enriched consortia35 revealed that dioxane

66

metabolism may not always be limited to group-5 THF MOs. Notably, a propane MO encoded by

67

the gene cluster prmABCD was postulated to be associated with dioxane degradation in

68

Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06, since (1) the monohydroxylated product of dioxane, 1,4-

69

dioxane-2-ol, was detected as a metabolic intermediate14, and (2) all individual gene components

70

were upregulated by the exposure of dioxane36. This propane MO in PH-06 belongs to the group-

71

6 SDIMOs and exhibits low sequence identities (i.e., < 40%) with THF MOs (Table 1) and the

72

putative group-5 propane MO (Table S1) in Rhodococcus jostii RHA137, an actinomycete that

73

degrades dioxane after pre-grown with propane38, despite sharing the same four key enzyme

74

components. These results suggest that intrinsic dioxane attenuation potential is probably being

75

underestimated using molecular assessments that are limited to THF MOs and their genes. Though

76

previous intermediate analysis and expression assays shed light on the dioxane degradation process

77

in PH-06, no enzymatic evidence has been provided to unequivocally identify the key enzyme that

78

initially attacks dioxane. This effort is urgently needed to prevent unspecific design of monitoring

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

79

tools that potentially mistarget enzymes/genes involved in the conversion and assimilation of

80

dioxane’s metabolites.

81

In this study, we uncover the critical enzyme that initiates the oxidation of dioxane in PH-

82

06 using heterologous expression, which has yet been done for any group-6 SDIMOs. Thus, we

83

first evaluate the transcription pattern of the propane MO gene cluster in PH-06 to investigate the

84

components needed for the proper expression of this enzyme. Oxidation activities and products of

85

this propane MO are further assessed in the expression host to inevitably elucidate its catalytic

86

function. This research advances our fundamental knowledge of dioxane metabolic processes and

87

enables the development of molecular tools that amend current assessments of MNA and

88

bioremediation potentials at contaminated fields.

89

2. Materials and Methods

90

2.1. Bacterial Strains

91

Bacterial strains used in this study include Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-0614,

92

Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2-155 (a highly electrotransformable mutant of ATCC-60739) as the

93

heterologous expression host40, 41, and Escherichia coli DH5α (New England BioLabs, Ipswich,

94

MA) as the cloning host. PH-06 was cultured in Ammonium Mineral Salts (AMS) medium with

95

dioxane as the sole growth substrate42. mc2-155 and DH5α were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB)

96

medium.

97

2.2. Gene Transcription and Expression Test

98

To discern the transcription of the propane MO gene cluster induced by various substrate

99

compounds, triplicate treatments were prepared in 160-mL serum bottles containing 20 mL of

100

AMS medium and PH-06 inoculum. Dioxane, THF, 1-propanol, 2-hydroxyethoxyacetic acid

101

(HEAA), pyruvate, glucose, or succinate was amended as the sole carbon source to achieve an

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 21

Page 7 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

102

initial concentration of 2 mM. A parallel treatment was amended with propane in headspace (1.5 %,

103

v/v). All treatments were incubated at 30 °C while shaking at 120 rpm. PH-06 cells at exponential

104

phase (when half of the added substrates were consumed) were harvested for total RNA extraction

105

and subsequent reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and qPCR (RT-qPCR) analysis43 (see

106

Supporting Information).

107

2.3. Heterologous Expression of the PH-06 Propane MO

108

A 4.0-kb fragment of the gene cluster prmABCD in PH-06 was amplified and cloned into

109

the vector pTip-QC244 via restriction enzyme digestion and ligation, resulting in the appropriate

110

recombinant construct designated as pTip-prmABCD. Plasmid pTip-prmABCD or empty vector

111

pTip-QC2 was used to transform electrocompetent mc2-155 cells based on the method of Ly et

112

al.40. After screening with chloramphenicol, successful transformant cells containing the plasmid

113

pTip-QC2 constructs with and without the prmABDC insert [designated as mc2-155(pTip-

114

prmABCD) and mc2-155(pTip-QC2), respectively] were cultured and dosed with thiostrepton to

115

induce the heterologous expression prior to the following biotransformation assays. Production of

116

the PH-06 propane MO components in induced mc2-155 transformants was examined by

117

SDS/PAGE analysis. Details regarding the heterologous cloning and expression procedures are

118

provided in the Supporting Information.

119

2.4. Biotransformation Assays of the prmABCD Expressing Clones

120

To perform oxidation assays, mc2-155(pTip-prmABCD) and mc2-155(pTip-QC2) cells

121

were suspended in PBS buffer after induction25, 26, 45. The transformation of dioxane, dioxane-d8,

122

THF, and propane were tested in triplicate, in 25-mL serum vials containing 4.5 mL of PBS buffer

123

and 0.5 mL of cell suspensions. The initial biomass was estimated as 1.5 mg of total protein per

124

vial using the Bradford assay46. Initial concentrations of dioxane, dioxane-d8, and THF were 0.61

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

125

mM, 0.62 mM and 0.50 mM, respectively. Propane was added as neat amount of 28.6 µmol in the

126

headspace. Abiotic controls were prepared without cell suspensions. Treatments were all incubated

127

at 30 ºC while shaking at 175 rpm. At the selected incubation time, aqueous (600 μL) or headspace

128

(100 μL for propane) samples were removed and analyzed for the disappearance of the amended

129

compounds and production of metabolites (e.g., HEAA) by GC-FID or GC/MS analysis47, 48 (see

130

Supporting Information).

131

3. Results and Discussion

132

3.1. Dioxane-induced Polycistronic Transcription of the prmABCD Gene Cluster

133

As evident by the visible bands of A, AB, BC, CD, and ABCD by RT-PCR analysis (Figure

134

1), all four prm genes encoding the propane MO were co-transcribed to produce a polycistronic

135

mRNA transcript when PH-06 was exposed to dioxane, THF, and propane. However, no

136

transcription of these four prm genes was observed when PH-06 was fed with known metabolites

137

of dioxane, THF, and propane (e.g., HEAA25, 48, succinate22, and 1-propanol49) or other common

138

substrates (e.g., glucose and pyruvate). Similar results were obtained by RT-qPCR analysis (Figure

139

S2). After normalized with the treatment in which PH-06 was fed with pyruvate, the expression of

140

the prmA gene was significantly induced by dioxane, THF, and propane, but not by HEAA or 1-

141

propanol. The upregulation of the prmA gene was of comparable levels for dioxane (7.8 ± 1.3

142

folds), THF (7.4 ± 1.2 folds), and propane (7.4 ± 1.1 folds), which is in accordance with the RNA-

143

seq and RT-qPCR analysis by He et al.36.

144

Adjacent to this prmABCD cluster, there are no other genes annotated on the same strand

145

except a downstream groEL gene (Figure 1A and S3A). Previous molecular studies revealed the

146

critical role of groEL-encoded chaperonin protein in the productive folding of SDIMO

147

hydroxylase subunits50, 51. However, transcription of this downstream groEL gene is independent

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 21

Page 9 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

148

from the prmABCD gene cluster, because (1) no DE or ABCDE transcript band was visible by the

149

RT-PCR analysis when the prmABCD gene cluster was induced by dioxane, THF, or propane

150

(Figure 1B), and (2) inverted sequence repeats exist at the immediate downstream of prmD (Figure

151

S5) indicating a putative rho-independent transcription termination site for the prmABCD gene

152

cluster. This confirms the prmABCD gene cluster as an intact polycistronic transcription unit,

153

allowing the subsequent heterologous expression assay.

154

PH-06’s prmABCD gene cluster is carried by a composite transposon, which is bounded

155

by two insertion sequences (ISs) belonging to the family of IS256 (Figure S3). These two IS256

156

elements are replicas, though the one downstream of prmABCD (i.e., IS256-R) has been partially

157

chopped by latter gene disruption events (Figure S3 and S4). As IS256 transposases mediate gene

158

transposition via the conservative cut-and-paste mechanism52, 53, relocation of this prmABCD gene

159

cluster from chromosome to a plasmid promotes intercellular spreading of this unique catabolic

160

advantage via horizontal gene transfer in environments where a selective pressure of dioxane

161

contamination is present.

162

3.2. Oxidation of Dioxane by the PH-06 Propane MO in Heterologous Expression Clones

163

To verify the role of this PH-06 propane MO in dioxane degradation, the prmABCD gene

164

cluster was cloned and expressed in mc2-155 as the heterologous host, because (i) it belongs to the

165

same Mycobacterium genus as PH-06, (ii) it is unable to oxidize or transform test substrates

166

(dioxane, THF, and propane54), and (iii) it was successfully used to express an analogous multi-

167

component group-3 SDIMO gene (smoXYB1C1Z) from Mycobacterium chubuense NBB441. As

168

depicted in Figure S6, SDS-PAGE analysis indicated successful heterologous expression of all

169

four propane MO components in the soluble protein fraction of the induced mc2-155(pTip-

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

170

prmABCD) cells in comparison with the control cells with the empty vectors [i.e., mc2-155(pTip-

171

QC2)].

172

Oxidation assays using mc2-155(pTip-prmABCD) cells demonstrated the produced

173

propane MO is capable of degrading dioxane, THF, and propane (Figure 2), which was also

174

verified with dioxane-d8 as a deuterated control. For the first two hours, instant oxidation rates of

175

dioxane, THF, dioxane-d8, and propane were estimated as 0.29, 0.54, 0.13, and 0.20 µmol

176

substrate/mg protein/hr, respectively. In contrast, no degradation activity of mc2-155(pTip-QC2)

177

transformants was observed towards any of the four tested substrates. No significant loss of

178

dioxane, THF, dioxane-d8, or propane was distinguished in the abiotic controls.

179

Page 10 of 21

Mycobacterium sp. ENV421 also harbors a group-6 SDIMO gene cluster45 that shares a

180

close phylogenetic relationship with the prmABCD in PH-06 (amino acid sequence identity of 59.3%

181

for alpha subunits). Notably, ENV421 can cometabolize dioxane following the growth on propane.

182

Unfortunately, the heterologous expression of this ENV421 group-6 SDIMO was unsuccessful

183

possibly because only a portion of its gene cluster (~ 2.7 kb) was sequenced and cloned.45 It is

184

plausible to postulate that this ENV421 group-6 SDIMO is in charge of the oxidation of both

185

propane and dioxane, since the involvement of other MOs (e.g., a CYP153-type cytochrome P450

186

oxygenase and an AlkB-type alkane MO) in this strain was precluded based on enzymatic assays45.

187

3.3. Detection of HEAA as a Dioxane Degradation Intermediate

188

HEAA and 1,4-dioxane-2-one (PDX) are commonly detected as the terminal metabolites

189

of dioxane in cells heterologously expressing SDIMOs25 or accumulated in bacterial

190

cometabolism28, 48. To further investigate the metabolic products of the PH-06 propane MO in the

191

heterologous expression cells, acidification was employed to distinguish the detection of HEAA

192

and PDX. Figure 3 depicts that PDX was only observed when the filtered medium of dioxane-

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

193

grown mc2-155(pTip-prmABCD) transformants was acidified by formic acid. However, without

194

acidification, no PDX was detected. A similar observation was verified when the induced

195

transformants were exposed to dioxane-d8 (Figure 3). As HEAA converts to PDX after

196

acidification55, our mass spectrometry results demonstrated that dioxane was transformed to

197

HEAA, but not PDX, in heterologous clones expressing the PH-06 propane MO. The detection of

198

HEAA corroborates our hypothesis that this propane MO activates the α-carbon of dioxane to

199

insert a hydroxyl group and form 1,4-dioxane-2-ol14, which is subsequently oxidized to HEAA.

200

This is similar to the initial biotransformation pathways observed in wildtype or transformant cells

201

expressing group-5 THF MOs.22, 25, 28, 29, 48

202

Overall, we have identified a novel group-6 propane MO in PH-06 and proved its catalytic

203

function of initiating the oxidation of dioxane via α-hydroxylation. As previous research regarding

204

dioxane biodegradation has been extensively centered on group-5 THF MOs, this is the first study

205

that has uncovered a bacterial dioxane-degrading MO beyond this specific enzyme group through

206

enzymological analysis. This study also provides the first demonstration of successful

207

heterologous expression of group-6 SDIMOs, allowing future kinetic and structural investigations

208

at the enzymatic level. Our findings extend our understanding of the diversity of dioxane degrading

209

oxygenases and avail us with a novel enzyme for mitigating dioxane contamination, as well as

210

function-characterized sequences for developing molecular tools to improve the evaluation of

211

natural attenuation and bioremediation at dioxane-impacted sites.

212

Acknowledgements

213

This project was supported by the start-up fund from the Department of Chemistry and

214

Environmental Science at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), USGS WRRI Program

215

(#2017NJ388B), NJIT Faculty Seed Grant (#211247) and Undergraduate Research and Innovation

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

216

(URI) Program. We thank Dr. Yoon-Seok Chang (POSTECH), Dr. Nicolas Coleman (Sydney

217

University), Dr. Tomohiro Tamura (AIST) for providing experimental strains and vectors. We also

218

thank Dr. John Wilson (Scissortail Environmental Solutions, LLC) for his insightful comments.

219

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 21

Page 13 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

(A)

prmA

prmC

A

B

C

D

prmB A

E

CD

Succinate Glucose

702 bp

Pyruvate

1072 bp

HEAA

BC

1-Propanol

948 bp

DE ABCD

Propane 1936 bp

THF Dioxane

2095 bp

ABCDE

220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227

(B) Genome DNA

prmD

254 bp AB

groEL

A

3640 bp

AB

BC

CD

DE

ABCD ABCDE 16S

Figure 1. Transcription of the prmABCD gene cluster when PH-06 was fed with dioxane, THF, propane, and other substrates as sole carbon and energy sources. Positions and sizes of the targeted transcript fragments are depicted in scale (A). RT-PCR products representing induced production of the targeted mRNA transcripts are visualized as bands of their accordant fragment sizes via gel electrophoresis (B). The 16S rRNA gene of PH-06 was employed as a positive expression control gene for all treatments. Genomic DNA was used as the positive template among PCR reactions. Original gel electrophoresis images are provided in Figure S1.

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

0.8

pTip-QC2

(A)

0.6

0.4

0.2

Abiotic Control

0.8

THF Concentration (mM)

Dioxane Concentration (mM)

pTip-prmABCD

0.0

(B)

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 0

5

10

15

20

0

5

(C)

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 0

229 230 231 232

5

10

10

15

20

Time (h)

15

Propane Concentration (mM)

Dioxane-d8 Concentration (mM)

Time (h)

228

Page 14 of 21

20

(D)

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6 0

Time (h)

5

10

15

20

Time (h)

Figure 2. Degradation activity of heterologous PH-06 propane MO expression clones towards (A) dioxane, (B) THF, (C) dioxane-d8, and (D) propane. Substrate removal was compared among mc2155 transformant clones containing plasmid pTip-prmABCD, the empty vector of pTip-QC2, and abiotic control. Error bars indicate standard deviations among triplicates.

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

(A)

HEAA with Acidification Metabolites of Dioxane without Acidification Metabolites of Dioxane with Acidification Metabolites of Dioxane-d8 without Acidification Metabolites of Dioxane-d8 with Acidification

(B)

PDX-d6 PDX (C)

233 234 235 236 237 238

Figure 3. Detection of metabolic products of dioxane in mc2-155 clones expressing the PH-06 propane MO. (A) Chromatographs of GC/MS analysis of dioxane and dioxane-d8 metabolites with and without the acidification of formic acid. Acidified HEAA was employed as a positive control. Positive chromatographic peaks of PDX and PDX-d6 are highlighted in (A) and their mass spectra are presented in (B) and (C), respectively.

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

239 240 241

Page 16 of 21

Table 1. Comparison between the essential enzymatic protein components of the group-6 propane MO in Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06 and the group-5 THF MO in Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans CB1190. Group-6 Propane MO in PH-06 Key Enzyme Components

Group-5 THF MO in CB1190

Amino Acid Identity

Gene Name

Amino Acid Residues

Molecular Mass (kDa)

Gene Name

Amino Acid Residues

Molecular Mass (kDa)

prmA

513

58.9

thmA

545

62.5

39.6%

prmB

364

40.2

thmB

346

39.3

29.1%

Coupling protein

prmC

106

11.9

thmC

117

12.6

28.1%

Reductase

prmD

344

37.3

thmD

361

40.0

34.3%

Hydroxylase alpha subunit Hydroxylase beta subunit

242

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

243

Supporting Information Available:

244 245 246 247 248

Detailed experimental procedures for RNA extraction, RT-PCR, RT-qPCR, cloning and heterologous expression, SDS-PAGE, and analytical methods; comparison between propane MOs in PH-06 and RHA1; genetic characterization of the PH-06 prmABCD gene cluster and the associated composite transposon; additional results of transcription analysis and induced protein production verified in expression clones.

17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

249

References

250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292

1. Zenker, M. J.; Borden, R. C.; Barlaz, M. A., Occurrence and treatment of 1, 4-dioxane in aqueous environments. Environmental Engineering Science 2003, 20, 423-432. 2. Mohr, T.; Stickney, J.; DiGuiseppi, W., Environmental Investigation and Remediation: 1,4-Dioxane and Other Solvent Stabilizers. CRC Press: 2010. 3. IARC Monograph on 1,4-Dioxane; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1999. 4. Adamson, D. T.; Piña, E. A.; Cartwright, A. E.; Rauch, S. R.; Anderson, R. H.; Mohr, T.; Connor, J. A., 1, 4-Dioxane drinking water occurrence data from the third unregulated contaminant monitoring rule. Science of the Total Environment 2017, 596, 236-245. 5. Adamson, D. T.; Mahendra, S.; Walker, K. L.; Rauch, S. R.; Sengupta, S.; Newell, C. J., A multisite survey to identify the scale of the 1,4-dioxane problem at contaminated groundwater sites. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2014, 1, 254-258. 6. Anderson, R. H.; Anderson, J. K.; Bower, P. A., Co-occurrence of 1,4-dioxane with trichloroethylene in chlorinated solvent groundwater plumes at US Air Force installations: Fact or fiction. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2012, 8, 731-737. 7. EPA Technical Fact Sheet - 1,4-Dioxane; EPA: Washington DC, 2014. 8. EPA Treatment Technologies for 1,4-Dioxane: Fundamentals and Field Applications; EPA: Cincinnati, OH, 2006. 9. Li, M.; Mathieu, J.; Liu, Y.; Van Orden, E. T.; Yang, Y.; Fiorenza, S.; Alvarez, P. J., The abundance of tetrahydrofuran/dioxane monooxygenase genes (thmA/dxmA) and 1, 4-dioxane degradation activity are significantly correlated at various impacted aquifers. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2014, 1, 122-127. 10. Adamson, D. T.; Anderson, R. H.; Mahendra, S.; Newell, C. J., Evidence of 1,4-dioxane attenuation at groundwater sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents and 1,4-dioxane. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49, 6510-6518. 11. Li, M.; Mathieu, J.; Yang, Y.; Fiorenza, S.; Deng, Y.; He, Z.; Zhou, J.; Alvarez, P. J., Widespread distribution of soluble di-iron monooxygenase (SDIMO) genes in Arctic groundwater impacted by 1, 4-dioxane. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47, 99509958. 12. Gedalanga, P.; Madison, A.; Miao, Y. R.; Richards, T.; Hatton, J.; DiGuiseppi, W. H.; Wilson, J.; Mahendra, S., A Multiple Lines of Evidence Framework to Evaluate Intrinsic Biodegradation of 1, 4‐Dioxane. Remediation Journal 2016, 27, 93-114. 13. Parales, R. E.; Adamus, J. E.; White, N.; May, H. D., Degradation of 1,4-dioxane by an Actinomycete in pure culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1994, 60, 4527-4530. 14. Kim, Y. M.; Jeon, J. R.; Murugesan, K.; Kim, E. J.; Chang, Y. S., Biodegradation of 1,4dioxane and transformation of related cyclic compounds by a newly isolated Mycobacterium sp. PH-06. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 511-519. 15. Huang, H.; Shen, D.; Li, N.; Shan, D.; Shentu, J.; Zhou, Y., Biodegradation of 1, 4dioxane by a novel strain and its biodegradation pathway. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2014, 225, 1-11. 16. Inoue, D.; Tsunoda, T.; Sawada, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Saito, Y.; Sei, K.; Ike, M., 1,4Dioxane degradation potential of members of the genera Pseudonocardia and Rhodococcus. Biodegradation 2016, 1-10.

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 21

Page 19 of 21

293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

17. Matsui, R.; Takagi, K.; Sakakibara, F.; Abe, T.; Shiiba, K., Identification and characterization of 1,4-dioxane-degrading microbe separated from surface seawater by the seawater-charcoal perfusion apparatus. Biodegradation 2016, 27, 155-163. 18. Sei, K.; Miyagaki, K.; Kakinoki, T.; Fukugasako, K.; Inoue, D.; Ike, M., Isolation and characterization of bacterial strains that have high ability to degrade 1, 4-dioxane as a sole carbon and energy source. Biodegradation 2013, 24, 665-674. 19. Pugazhendi, A.; Banu, J. R.; Dhavamani, J.; Yeom, I. T., Biodegradation of 1, 4-dioxane by Rhodanobacter AYS5 and the role of additional substrates. Annals of Microbiology 2015, 65, 2201-2208. 20. Chen, D.-Z.; Jin, X.-J.; Chen, J.; Ye, J.-X.; Jiang, N.-X.; Chen, J.-M., Intermediates and substrate interaction of 1, 4-dioxane degradation by the effective metabolizer Xanthobacter flavus DT8. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2016, 106, 133-140. 21. Bernhardt, D.; Diekmann, H., Degradation of Dioxane, Tetrahydrofuran and Other Cyclic Ethers by an Environmental Rhodococcus Strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1991, 36, 120-123. 22. Thiemer, B.; Andreesen, J. R.; Schrader, T., Cloning and characterization of a gene cluster involved in tetrahydrofuran degradation in Pseudonocardia sp. strain K1. Archives of Microbiology 2003, 179, 266-277. 23. Yao, Y.; Lv, Z.; Min, H.; Jiao, H., Isolation, identification and characterization of a novel Rhodococcus sp. strain in biodegradation of tetrahydrofuran and its medium optimization using sequential statistics-based experimental designs. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100, 2762-2769. 24. Masuda, H.; McClay, K.; Steffan, R. J.; Zylstra, G. J., Biodegradation of tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-dioxane by soluble diiron monooxygenase in Pseudonocardia sp. strain ENV478. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012, 22, 312-316. 25. Sales, C. M.; Grostern, A.; Parales, J. V.; Parales, R. E.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., Oxidation of the cyclic ethers 1,4-dioxane and tetrahydrofuran by a monooxygenase in two Pseudonocardia species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2013, 79, 7702-7708. 26. Mahendra, S.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., Kinetics of 1,4-dioxane biodegradation by monooxygenase-expressing bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40, 54355442. 27. Sales, C. M.; Mahendra, S.; Grostern, A.; Parales, R. E.; Goodwin, L. A.; Woyke, T.; Nolan, M.; Lapidus, A.; Chertkov, O.; Ovchinnikova, G.; Sczyrba, A.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., Genome sequence of the 1,4-dioxane-degrading Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans strain CB1190. Journal of Bacteriology 2011, 193, 4549-4550. 28. Mahendra, S.; Petzold, C. J.; Baidoo, E. E.; Keasling, J. D.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., Identification of the intermediates of in vivo oxidation of 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenasecontaining bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology 2007, 41, 7330-7336. 29. Grostern, A.; Sales, C. M.; Zhuang, W. Q.; Erbilgin, O.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., Glyoxylate metabolism is a key feature of the metabolic degradation of 1,4-dioxane by Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans strain CB1190. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2012, 78, 3298-3308. 30. Coleman, N. V.; Bui, N. B.; Holmes, A. J., Soluble di-iron monooxygenase gene diversity in soils, sediments and ethene enrichments. Environmental Microbiology 2006, 8, 1228-1239. 31. Leahy, J. G.; Batchelor, P. J.; Morcomb, S. M., Evolution of the soluble diiron monooxygenases. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2003, 27, 449-479.

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381

32. Notomista, E.; Lahm, A.; Di Donato, A.; Tramontano, A., Evolution of bacterial and archaeal multicomponent monooxygenases. Journal of Molecular Evolution 2003, 56, 435-445. 33. Holmes, A. J.; Coleman, N. V., Evolutionary ecology and multidisciplinary approaches to prospecting for monooxygenases as biocatalysts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2008, 94, 75-84. 34. He, Y.; Wei, K.; Si, K.; Mathieu, J.; Li, M.; Alvarez, P. J., Whole-Genome Sequence of the 1, 4-Dioxane-Degrading Bacterium Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06. Genome announcements 2017, 5, e00625-17. 35. He, Y.; Mathieu, J.; da Silva, M. L. B.; Li, M.; Alvarez, P. J. J., 1,4-Dioxane-degrading consortia can be enriched from uncontaminated soils: prevalence of Mycobacterium and soluble di-iron monooxygenase genes. Microbial Biotechnology, 2017 n/a-n/a. 36. He, Y.; Mathieu, J.; Yang, Y.; Yu, P.; da Silva, M. L. B.; Alvarez, P. J. J., 1,4-Dioxane Biodegradation by Mycobacterium dioxanotrophicus PH-06 Is Associated with a Group-6 Soluble Di-Iron Monooxygenase. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2017, 4, 494499. 37. Sharp, J. O.; Sales, C. M.; LeBlanc, J. C.; Liu, J.; Wood, T. K.; Eltis, L. D.; Mohn, W. W.; Alvarez-Cohen, L., An inducible propane monooxygenase is responsible for Nnitrosodimethylamine degradation by Rhodococcus sp. strain RHA1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007, 73, 6930-6938. 38. Hand, S.; Wang, B.; Chu, K. H., Biodegradation of 1,4-dioxane: effects of enzyme inducers and trichloroethylene. Science of the Total Environment 2015, 520, 154-159. 39. Snapper, S.; Melton, R.; Mustafa, S.; Kieser, T.; WR Jr, J., Isolation and characterization of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Molecular Microbiology 1990, 4, 1911-1919. 40. Ly, M. A.; Liew, E. F.; Le, N. B.; Coleman, N. V., Construction and evaluation of pMycoFos, a fosmid shuttle vector for Mycobacterium spp. with inducible gene expression and copy number control. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2011, 86, 320-326. 41. Martin, K. E.; Ozsvar, J.; Coleman, N. V., SmoXYB1C1Z of Mycobacterium sp. strain NBB4: a soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO)-like enzyme, active on C2 to C4 alkanes and alkenes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2014, 80, 5801-5806. 42. Li, M.; Fiorenza, S.; Chatham, J. R.; Mahendra, S.; Alvarez, P. J., 1, 4-Dioxane biodegradation at low temperatures in Arctic groundwater samples. Water Research 2010, 44, 2894-2900. 43. Li, M.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; Mathieu, J.; Hatton, J.; DiGuiseppi, W.; Alvarez, P. J., Hindrance of 1, 4-dioxane biodegradation in microcosms biostimulated with inducing or non-inducing auxiliary substrates. Water Research 2017, 112, 217-225. 44. Nakashima, N.; Tamura, T., Isolation and characterization of a rolling-circle-type plasmid from Rhodococcus erythropolis and application of the plasmid to multiple-recombinantprotein expression. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004, 70, 5557-5568. 45. Masuda, H.; McClay, K.; Steffan, R.; Zylstra, G., Characterization of three propane‐ inducible oxygenases in Mycobacterium sp. strain ENV421. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2012, 55, 175-181. 46. Bradford, M. M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 1976, 72, 248-254.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 21

Page 21 of 21

382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

47. Li, M.; Conlon, P.; Fiorenza, S.; Vitale, R. J.; Alvarez, P. J., Rapid analysis of 1, 4‐ dioxane in groundwater by frozen micro‐extraction with Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 2011, 31, 70-76. 48. Vainberg, S.; McClay, K.; Masuda, H.; Root, D.; Condee, C.; Zylstra, G. J.; Steffan, R. J., Biodegradation of ether pollutants by Pseudonocardia sp. strain ENV478. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2006, 72, 5218-5224. 49. Kotani, T.; Kawashima, Y.; Yurimoto, H.; Kato, N.; Sakai, Y., Gene structure and regulation of alkane monooxygenases in propane-utilizing Mycobacterium sp. TY-6 and Pseudonocardia sp. TY-7. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 2006, 102, 184-192. 50. Furuya, T.; Hayashi, M.; Semba, H.; Kino, K., The mycobacterial binuclear iron monooxygenases require a specific chaperonin‐like protein for functional expression in a heterologous host. The FEBS Journal 2013, 280, 817-826. 51. Furuya, T.; Hayashi, M.; Kino, K., Reconstitution of active mycobacterial binuclear iron monooxygenase complex in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2013, 79, 6033-6039. 52. Haren, L.; Ton-Hoang, B.; Chandler, M., Integrating DNA: transposases and retroviral integrases. Annual Review of Microbiology 1999, 53, 245-281. 53. Loessner, I.; Dietrich, K.; Dittrich, D.; Hacker, J.; Ziebuhr, W., Transposase-Dependent Formation of Circular IS256 Derivatives in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology 2002, 184, 4709-4714. 54. Coleman, N. V.; Le, N. B.; Ly, M. A.; Ogawa, H. E.; McCarl, V.; Wilson, N. L.; Holmes, A. J., Hydrocarbon monooxygenase in Mycobacterium: recombinant expression of a member of the ammonia monooxygenase superfamily. The ISME Journal 2012, 6, 171-182. 55. Braun, W.; Young, J., Identification of β-hydroxyethoxyacetic acid as the major urinary metabolite of 1, 4-dioxane in the rat. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 1977, 39, 33-38.

407

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment