A Supramolecular Platform for the Introduction of Fc-Fusion Bioactive

This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.

Article Cite This: ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

pubs.acs.org/acsapm

A Supramolecular Platform for the Introduction of Fc-Fusion Bioactive Proteins on Biomaterial Surfaces Matilde Putti,†,‡,§ Simone M. J. de Jong,†,‡,§ Oscar M. J. A. Stassen,§ Cecilia M. Sahlgren,‡,§,∥,⊥ and Patricia Y. W. Dankers*,†,‡,§

Downloaded via 185.46.84.198 on July 24, 2019 at 08:45:32 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

†

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ‡ Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands § Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ∥ Faculty for Science and Engineering, Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland ⊥ Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Bioorthogonal chemistry is an excellent method for functionalization of biomaterials with bioactive molecules, as it allows for decoupling of material processing and bioactivation. Here, we report on a modular system created by means of tetrazine/trans-cyclooctene (Tz/TCO) click chemistry undergoing an inverse electron demand Diels−Alder cycloaddition. A reactive supramolecular surface based on ureido-pyrimidinones (UPy) is generated via a UPy-Tz additive, in order to introduce a versatile TCO-protein G conjugate for immobilization of Fc-fusion proteins. As a model bioactive protein, we introduced FcJagged1, a Notch ligand, to induce Notch signaling activity on the material. Interestingly, HEK293 FLN1 cells expressing the Notch1 receptor were repelled by films modified with TCO-protein G but adhered and spread on functionalized electrospun meshes. This indicates that the material processing method influences the biocompatibility of the postmodification. Notch signaling activity was upregulated 5.6-fold with respect to inactive controls on electrospun materials modified with TCO-protein G/Fc-Jagged1. Furthermore, downstream effects of Notch signaling were detected on the gene level in vascular smooth muscle cells expressing the Notch3 receptor. Taken together, our results demonstrate the successful use of a modular supramolecular system for the postprocessing modification of solid materials with functional proteins. KEYWORDS: supramolecular biomaterial, protein G, Jagged1, click-chemistry, supramolecular additive

■

INTRODUCTION Biomaterials for application in medical implants and devices often undergo treatments requiring organic solvents, a high temperature, pressure, or voltage (e.g., solution or melt electrospinning, 3D printing, injection molding). The decoration of biomaterials with functional proteins such as growth factors, cytokines, and signaling molecules can be poorly compatible with such processing techniques. Therefore, bioorthogonal conjugation chemistries have been implemented for the postprocessing modification of biomaterial surfaces. A family of reactions referred to as “click-chemistry” has gained © XXXX American Chemical Society

popularity among material scientists because of its hallmark features of fast kinetics, high yields, easily removable harmless byproducts, high selectivity without a catalyst, and insensitivity to water or oxygen.1,2 Examples of applications of clickchemistry in biomedical sciences are reported using photoactivated thiol−ene/yne chemistry,3−5 Michael additions,6,7 oxime and hydrazones formation via reaction of aldehydes/ Received: April 10, 2019 Accepted: June 13, 2019 Published: June 13, 2019 A

DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00334 ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Scheme 1. Chemical Structures of the Molecules Used in This Study: Bifunctional Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Based Polymer (UPyPCL), UPy-Functionalized Tetrazine Additive for Post-Modification (UPy-Tz), Product of the iEDDAC Reaction between UPy-Tz and TCO-Modified Protein G (TCO-OEG4-Protein G, TCO-pG, Green); Concept of Step-Wise Modification of the Supramolecular UPy-PCL Surface with Fc-Fusion Protein: Formulation of Supramolecular UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz System (Top), TCO/Tz Reaction at the Surface (Middle), Site-Specific Binding of Fc-Fusion Protein on TCO-pG (Bottom)

ketones with respectively alkoxyamines or hydrazides,8,9 strain promoted azide−alkyne cycloadditions (SPAAC),10−12 and inverse electron demand Diels−Alder cycloadditions (iEDDAC).13−17 The latter class comprises the reaction occurring between a tetrazine (Tz) and a strained trans-cyclooctene (TCO). Reported rate constants for this reaction are as high as 3.3 × 106 M−1 s−1 (in H2O at 25 °C), thereby making the Tz/ TCO conjugation the fastest bioorthogonal reaction known so far.18,19 This class of reactions has been found to be very suitable for targeting biomolecules such as proteins and antibodies in complex environments. iEDDAC chemistry has been used for the labeling of antibodies with nanoparticles and radioactive probes for cell targeting,20,21 rapid in vivo protein conjugation,22 or in vivo fluorescent labeling of antibodies.23 Recombinant protein G presents two immunoglobulin (IgG)-binding domains. The major binding site in IgG is

located in the Fc domain of the antibody.24 Protein G binds strongly all human IgG subclasses with a Kd ∼ 2 × 10−10 M,25 thereby finding several applications as an affinity matrix for purification and detection of antibodies. The Fc-binding properties of protein G have been exploited for the immobilization of Fc-fusion proteins,26,27 including Notch ligands Dll1, Dll4, and Jagged1.28−30 As a model Fc-fusion bioactive protein, we chose the Notch ligand Jagged1. Jagged1mediated Notch signaling has been recently proposed as a target for cardiovascular regenerative medicine as the Notch signaling pathway is a powerful orchestrator of development, homeostasis, and wound healing of such tissues.31,32 Jagged1functionalized materials based on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) have been proposed as artificial niches for stem cells, which find applications in myocardial regeneration33,34 and pancreatic islet cell immunoprotection35 and for elucidating cell-matrix B


Article

ACS Applied Polymer Materials interactions.36,37 Furthermore, Notch signaling has been found to have varied roles in cancer,38,39 with the Notch-Jagged signaling representing a target for studying the origin of metastasis.40 Recently, we combined the iEDDAC click reaction with the dynamic traits of a supramolecular material system based on ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy).41 Materials based on the strong, directional interactions between hydrogen-bonding UPy groups represent an excellent framework for ECM-mimicking biomaterials.42−44 These supramolecular systems exhibit both macromolecular properties of thermoplastic elastomers and the dynamic character that can be found in highly complex biological systems. In solid UPy-polymers, lateral stacking of UPy-dimers and flanking urea units leads to the formation of a nanoscale fibrous assembly.45 Cell-instructive additives (e.g., peptides or antifouling molecules) can be robustly incorporated into the pristine material by means of matching supramolecular moieties to generate modular and easily processable materials for regenerative medicine applications.46−49 In a recent study, supramolecular UPy-poly(εcaprolactone) (UPy-PCL) was modified with a UPyconjugated Tz (UPy-Tz) additive.41 We were able to detect fluorescent TCO-modified enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (TCO-EYFP) immobilized on a three-dimensional fiber mesh fabricated with electrospinning, reporting the first evidence of successful decoupling of material processing and functionalization on a UPy-based modular system. The functionalization of UPy-PCL with reactive UPy-Tz additives allowed the introduction of antifouling coatings on the material surface to reduce protein and cell adhesion.50 Nevertheless, a biological read-out that proves the efficacy of the postmodification approach in immobilizing proteins has not been provided yet. Here, for the first time, we report the activity in a biological context of a supramolecular UPy-based material loaded with a TCO-modified protein, namely, protein G (Scheme 1). Recombinant protein G is modified with TCOmoieties, and the resulting TCO-protein G variant (TCO-pG) is characterized to verify its structural integrity and cytotoxicity. UPy-PCL containing UPy-Tz is processed into cast films and electrospun fibers, and the biocompatibility, functionality, and bioactivity of the materials are investigated in comparison with materials created by random adsorption of unmodified recombinant protein G (pG).

■

min) over the column using a 15 vol % to 75 vol % water/acetonitrile gradient with 0.1 vol % formic acid prior to analysis in positive mode in the mass spectrometer. Deconvolution of the m/z spectra was done using the MaxENT1 algorithm in the MassLynx software. Preparation of Drop Cast Films. For the preparation of drop cast films, 5 mol vol % of UPy-Tz was with the dry UPy-PCL from stock solutions in HFIP, and the amount of solvent was adjusted to reach a final UPy-PCL concentration of 50 mg/mL. Drop casting was performed by distributing 50 μL of solution on 14 mm Ø glass coverslip. Afterward, the films were dried overnight in a vacuum at 40 °C. For cell culture experiments, the films were sterilized with UV light for 10 min. Electrospinning. Electrospinning was carried out on climate ECCLI electrospinning equipment from IME Technologies (Waalre, NL). A 300 mg/mL solution of UPy-PCL with the addition of 5 mol vol % UPy-Tz was dissolved in an 8:2 mixture of CHCl3/HFIP v/v overnight before loading in a syringe equipped with a 19G flat-tipped nozzle. The solution was fed at a constant flow rate of 55 μL/min with a voltage of 13 kV and a tip-collector distance of 15 cm. Electrospun fibers were collected on a rotating (100 rpm) cylindrical collector covered in aluminum foil. After electrospinning, the meshes were dried overnight in vacuo. For cell culture experiments, samples were sterilized with UV light for 10 min. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using an FEI Quanta 600 and Xt Microscope Control software. Mesh samples were mounted on a metal stub by using double sided carbon tape. The samples were visualized under a low vacuum with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and a working distance of 10 mm. The fiber diameters were determined from multiple high magnification images using ImageJ software. Circular Dichroism (CD). The secondary structures of recombinant pG and TCO-pG were evaluated with CD spectroscopy using a JASCO J-815 spectrometer and a quartz cuvette with 1 cm path length. Spectra were collected between 200 and 300 nm at room temperature. Data are expressed as molar residual ellipticity (MRE), which is calculated from the measured ellipticity using the equation:51

MRE =

θ×m c × l × nr

where θ is the ellipticity in millidegrees, m is the molecular weight in grams per mole, c is the protein concentration in miiligrams per milliliter, l is the path length of the cuvette in centimeters, and nr is the number of amino acids in the molecule. Water Contact Angle Measurements. Water contact angle (WCA) measurements on drop cast films (n = 5) were performed on an OCA 30 system from Dataphysics using SCA20 software. A 5 μL drop of deionized water was placed on the films, and images were captured 10 s after placement of the water drop. Water contact angles were determined from the recorded images. Activation of Notch Signaling by Immobilized Ligands. For induction of Notch signaling with immobilized extracellular domain of the Jagged1 ligand, UPy-PCL drop cast films or electrospun meshes containing 5 mol vol % UPy-Tz were incubated with a 50 μg/mL solution of TCO-pG in PBS at room T for 1 h. As a control for aspecifically adsorbed protein, substrates were incubated with a 50 μg/mL solution of unconjugated recombinant pG in PBS at room temperature for 1 h. After coating, substrates were washed three times with PBS and further blocked with 10 mg/mL of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) in PBS for 2 h. As recombinant protein G lacks albumin-binding domains, this blocking step prevents aspecific adsorption of Fc-ligands at a later stage to surfaces that are not covered with protein G (conjugates). The blocked surfaces were washed with PBS and incubated with recombinant Fc-Jagged1 chimera (R&D systems) or only Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Fc fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at concentrations of 1 μg/mL in BSA 1 mg/mL in PBS for 3 h. After washing, cells were immediately seeded on the coated surfaces.52 Inhibition was performed by the addition of 10 μM N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenace-

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials. UPy-PCL (Mn ≈ 2700 g/mol) and UPy-Tz (MW = 1190 g/mol) were synthesized by SyMO-Chem BV (Eindhoven, NL) as previously described.50 TCO-OEG4-NHS ester (equatorial isomer) was obtained from Jena Bioscience (Jena, DE). 1,1,1,3,3,3,Hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) was obtained by FluoroChem (Hadfield, UK). Other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification, unless otherwise specified. Protein G Conjugation and Analysis by LC-QTOF-MS. Recombinant protein G (ThermoFisher, 21 444 g/mol; pG) in a 1:1 mixture of water/glycerol v/v was reacted with 10 equiv of TCOOEG4-NHS ester at 20 °C and 550 rpm for 1 h. The reaction was repeated three times, for a total of 30 equiv of TCO-OEG4-NHS ester. Afterward, the mixture was purified using 10 000 MWCO Amicon filters by diluting the reaction mixture with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution at pH 7.4 and centrifuging at 13 400 rpm for 5 min. The conjugated protein remained in the filter and was obtained by inverted spinning and analyzed using a Waters Xevo G2 Quadrupole Time of Flight (QToF) Liquid Chromatograph−Mass Spectrometer equipped with an Agilent Polaris C18A reverse phase column (ID 2.0 mm, length 100 mm). Proteins were flowed (0.3 mL/ C


Article


Figure 1. Characterization of products of conjugation of pG with TCO-OEG4-NHS ester. Chromatogram (A) and deconvoluted mass spectrum (insert) of recombinant protein G used for conjugation reaction. Chromatogram (B) and deconvoluted mass spectrum (insert) of the 1 to 5 times TCO-conjugated product. (C) CD spectrum reporting mean residual ellipticity (MRE) of conjugated (solid line) and unconjugated (dashed line) protein G, (D) relative LDH activity of HEK293 FLN1 cells exposed to pG, TCO-OEG4-NHS ester, and TCO-pG in solution for 24 h. tyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) to the culture medium from stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). For comparison, all other groups were treated with the same amount of DMSO. Protein Quantification. The amount of pG or TCO-pG deposited on either cast films or electrospun meshes was quantified by QuantiPro micro-BCA assay (Sigma-Aldrich) by directly incubating the protein-functionalized materials with the kit’s working solution at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by absorbance measurements at 562 nm. The quantification of immobilized FJagged1 on electrospun meshes (n = 3) was carried out using a similar procedure as described for protein G. The absolute absorbance of meshes coated with pG/ BSA or TCO-pG/BSA was subtracted from the absorbance of samples bioactivated by incubation with an FcJagged1 solution at 1 μg/mL. Cell Culture. Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells stably expressing full-length Notch1 (HEK293 FLN1) were cultured in complete medium consisting of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 5 vol % heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI-FBS) (Invitrogen) and 1 vol % penicillin− streptomycin solution (Invitrogen), at 37 °C and 5 vol % CO2 in a

humidified atmosphere. HEK293 FLN1 were cultured on tissue culture treated polystyrene under puromycin selection (1 μg/mL), passaged at 80 vol % confluency, and seeded at a concentration of 1.0 × 105 cells/cm2 on drop cast films or electrospun meshes. Primary human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (HCASMC, Lonza) were purchased and placed at passage 3, and experiments were carried out with cells at passage 5 or 6. Cells were cultured in 231 basal medium (Gibco) supplemented with 5 vol % smooth muscle growth supplement (SMGS, Gibco) and 1 vol % penicillin− streptomycin solution (Invitrogen), at 37 °C and 5 vol % CO2 in a humidified atmosphere on cell culture treated polystyrene. As a control for expression of α-smooth muscle actin in the differentiated state, the basal medium was supplemented with 1 vol % smooth muscle differentiation supplement (SMDS, Gibco) instead of SMGS. HCASMC was passaged at 80 vol % confluency and seeded at a concentration of 5.0 × 103 cells/cm2. Cytotoxicity, Cell Viability Assay. Cytotoxicity of different concentrations of TCO-pG in solution for the HEK293 FLN1 cell line was assessed using an LDH Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Pierce) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell viability was assessed D


Article


Figure 2. (A) Hydrophilicity of UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz films incubated with 50 μg/mL pG or TCO-pG for 1 h. Pristine material was incubated with Milli-Q water. (B) Phase contrast micrographs of HEK293 FLN1 cells cultured for 24 h on UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz dropcast films with adsorbed pG (left) or reacted with TCO-pG (right). Scale bar is 100 μm. (C) Metabolic activity of HEK293 FLN1 cell line cultured for 24 h on UPy-PCL/UPyTz films with adsorbed pG or reacted TCO-pG. (D) Notch signaling activity of HEK293 FLN1 cells cultured on UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz dropcast films coated with pG or reacted with TCO-pG. Data are normalized to the negative control (Fc-fragment only). Inhibition is carried out with 10 μM DAPT; all the other conditions are treated with the same amount of DMSO. Statistical Analyses. Data are expressed as average ± standard deviation. Statistically significant differences were determined using a nonparametric Kruskall−Wallis test followed by Dunn’s posthoc test. Asterisks in the figures indicate significant differences as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 Software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

as metabolic activity on different materials using an XTT in vitro Toxicology Assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase Reporter Assay. Notch signaling activity in HEK293 FLN1 cells was measured by transfecting cells with a 12xCSLLuciferase reporter construct53 (250 ng per 105 cells) 1 day before seeding. Poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) was used as a transfection vector in a 2:1 ratio with the DNA construct. Luminescence intensity was detected after 48 h from seeding with a Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instruction (n ≥ 6). Luminescence intensity was normalized for cell amount, which was measured with the CyQuant Assay kit (ThermoFisher) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Gene Expression Analyses. For gene expression analyses, HCASMC was cultured on the different substrates (n = 6) for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy isolation kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized with 150 ng of RNA per sample using the MMLV Reverse Transcriptase enzyme/kit (Bio-Rad). cDNA samples were subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and the Bio-Rad IQ5 detection system (Version 1.6). mRNA expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a reference gene and expressed as a fold increase with respect to the control group. Primer sequences are available in the Supporting Information. Fluorescence Microscopy. Cells were first washed with PBS, fixated in 3.7 vol % formaldehyde (Merck) for 10 min, washed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.5 vol % Triton X-100 (Merck) for 15 min. Cells were then incubated with phalloidin-Atto488 (SigmaAldrich) in the dark for 45 min, followed by incubation with DAPI (0.1 μg/mL) in PBS for 5 min. Finally, samples were washed and mounted on cover glasses with Mowiol (Sigma). Samples were imaged with a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M epifluorescence microscope.

■

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Synthesis and Characterization of Reactive TCOOEG4-Protein G Conjugate. The protein G-mediated immobilization of Fc-tagged Jagged1 has been demonstrated to be beneficial compared to the random adsorption of the ligand on cell culture substrates.54 The difference is attributed to a better orientation of the Fc-ligand on protein G with respect to uncontrolled adsorption. Therefore, a Tz-reactive TCO-functionalized variant of protein G was obtained by reacting the recombinant protein with a TCO-OEG4-NHS ester. The reaction conditions for TCO conjugation of recombinant protein G (Figure 1A) were optimized with the aim of minimizing unconjugated protein, in order to exclude the influence of randomly adsorbed protein on the following experiments. In a precedent study, EYFP was reacted with 3 equiv of TCO-OEG4-NHS ester for 1 h, eventually yielding one to five TCO moieties per protein molecule.41 In the case of recombinant protein G, the same reaction conditions led to mostly unconjugated protein, with a minor fraction of one-time conjugated protein (data not shown). Eventually, by feeding 10 equiv of TCO-OEG4-NHS ester three times to the reaction mixture, protein G functionalized with one to five TCO E


Article


Figure 3. (A) SEM micrograph of electrospun UPy-PCL + 5 mol vol % UPy-Tz. Scale bar is 50 μm. (B) Relative amount of pG or TCO-pG immobilized on the scaffold either via adsorption or specific iEDDAC reaction.

on materials with adsorbed protein G/Fc-Jagged1 exhibited a significant 2.8-fold increase in Notch activity, while no significant effect was detected on materials with TCO-pG/ Fc-Jagged1 (Figure 2D). To discriminate between the effects of the iEDDAC reaction and the TCO-modified protein G on cell adhesion, we observed the behavior of HEK293 FLN1 cells and CASMC, a good model for cardiovascular applications, on a film of UPyPCL without any UPy-Tz that have been incubated for 1 h with either pG or TCO-pG. For both cell types, the response in terms of adhesion and morphology is consistent with the one observed in the presence of UPy-Tz. On UPy-PCL and UPy-PCL/pG films, the cells formed healthy confluent monolayers, while they formed few clustered aggregates on UPy-PCL with adsorbed TCO-pG (Figure S1). In light of this, it is concluded that the negative cell response to TCO-pG, either reacted or adsorbed, might be due to conformational changes of the protein in contact with the relatively hydrophobic material, which might lead to the exposure of cell-repellent portions of pG. Although the CD spectroscopy characterization did not reveal structural changes of TCO-pG in solution with respect to pG (Figure 1C), we cannot exclude that the TCO-modification could have affected the stability of the protein’s folding state when in the proximity of the material. Although the CD spectroscopy characterization in solution did not reveal structural changes of TCO-pG with respect to pG (Figure 1C), this measurement is performed in solution only, and it is not indicative of the interaction of the protein with the material surface during adsorption. We cannot exclude that the stability of the protein’s folding state in the proximity of the solid material surface is compromised because of the presence of TCO moieties. WCA measurements were performed to get insights on the material surface characteristics after functionalization. The introduction of TCO-pG on the material’s surface decreases the average WCA of 7° ± 4° only (Figure 2A), and this value is almost identical to the WCA decrease caused by pG adsorption, which instead supports celladhesion. Therefore, we are unable to make a connection between surface hydrophilicity and cell-repulsion based on the available data. Cell Response on Functionalized Electrospun Meshes. The proposed material modification was translated from a two-dimensional film to a porous fibrous mesh prepared with electrospinning, as this is a more relevant structure for applications such as scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. A

moieties was obtained, and no unconjugated protein could be detected anymore (Figure 1B). The modified protein G was characterized by means of CD spectroscopy in order to compare signals coming from unmodified pG and TCO-pG. The shape of the two traces is found to be comparable, and it is consistent with the spectra reported in the literature (Figure 1C), indicating that the modification did not affect the folding state of the protein.55 In order to study the cytotoxicity of TCO-pG, a HEK293 FLN1 cell line expressing Notch1 receptors was chosen in view of the upcoming Notch signaling activity studies. TCO-pG was found to have no or low cytotoxicity for HEK293 FLN1 cells at a concentration up to 10 μM, with cell viability higher than 80 vol % (Figure 1D). Cell viability decreased to about 60 vol % when the TCO-pG reached concentrations of 100 μM, although it is unlikely that such an elevated concentration is found in the applied context. Cell Response to pG or TCO-pG Functionalized Films. Drop cast films of UPy-PCL with 5 mol vol % UPy-Tz were employed as a simple model to test cell response to materials in which protein G was incorporated either via adsorption (pG) or specific iEDDAc reaction (TCO-pG). First, the WCA of functionalized materials was measured to ascertain whether the short oligo(ethylene glycol) spacer present in TCO-pG might affect the material hydrophilicity and therefore cell behavior. The WCA decreased upon protein incorporation from 70° ± 1° for UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz to 67° ± 3° and 63° ± 4° for UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz with pG and TCO-pG, respectively (Figure 2A). The measured WCA values are consistent with previously reported values for comparable systems,41 and they are not likely to affect the cell response on bioactive films. HEK293 FLN1 cells adhered on films with aspecifically adsorbed pG, while they were repelled by surfaces on which TCO-pG was reacted with the Tz moieties present at the surface (Figure 2B). As the viability of HEK293 FLN1 cells that did not adhere is not different from the viability of cells adhered on control UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz film or on randomly adsorbed protein G (Figure 2C), toxicity effects of surfaces modified with iEDDAC possibly being the cause of the unfavorable cell response toward materials functionalized with reactive TCO-pG can be excluded. After protein immobilization via either adsorption or “click” reaction, the films were functionalized with the Fc-Jagged1 ligand (or Fc fragment only as a negative control) to measure Notch signaling activity. Consistently with the observed cell response, cells stimulated F


Article


Figure 4. (A) Fluorescence micrographs of HEK293 FLN1 cells cultured on UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz electrospun meshes coated with pG (left) or reacted with TCO-pG (right). F-actin (green), nuclei (blue). Scale bar is 50 μm. (B) Metabolic activity of HEK293 FLN1 cells cultured on electrospun UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz with adsorbed pG or reacted TCO-pG. (C) Notch signaling activity of HEK293 FLN1 cells cultured on UPy-PCL/ UPy-Tz electrospun meshes coated with pG or reacted with TCO-pG. Data are normalized to the negative control (Fc-fragment only). Inhibition is carried out with 10 μM DAPT; all the other conditions are treated with the same amount of DMSO.

solution of UPy-PCL with 5 mol vol % UPy-Tz was electrospun into meshes with an average fiber diameter of 2.3 ± 0.7 μm (Figure 3A). The reaction of TCO-pG and coating of the unmodified pG were carried out as described for the cast film. Quantification of the amount of protein G deposited on the electrospun meshes revealed that the iEDDAC reaction of TCO-pG on the material surface leads to a 7.2-fold increase in the amount of protein presented on the scaffold with respect to the amount of pG present after a specific adsorption (Figure 3B). Therefore, it can be concluded that the immobilization of pG via TCO-Tz chemistry allows loading of the pristine material with a wider range of bioactive protein concentrations than mere adsorption. Protein quantification was attempted for cast films as well, but the amount of protein G turned out to be below the detection limit of the assay (data not shown). The difference can likely be attributed to the large surface area that characterizes porous electrospun meshes compared to two-dimensional films. A higher amount of immobilized protein G is hypothesized to cause a higher amount of immobilized Fc-fusion protein. To test this hypothesis, the amount of FcJagged1 bound to electrospun scaffolds functionalized with either pG or TCO-

pG was quantified as well. The results show an average 9.6-fold increase in FcJagged1 loading (Figure S2). Although the increase is not statistically significant due to the large spread in the values, the data suggest that the iEDDAC-mediate functionalization might yield a higher Fc-fusion protein loading on the scaffold. The HEK293 FLN1 cells’ response notably improved on the electrospun substrates with respect to cast films. Cells were able to adhere on UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz meshes with protein G either adsorbed or immobilized via specific iEDDAC reaction, although they showed slight clustering behavior on the latter (Figure 4A), indicating that the cells still prefer cell−cell contact instead of cell-material contact. Nevertheless, cell metabolic activity on the protein-loaded material was found to be similar to that on the pristine UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz (Figure 4B), indicating that HEK293 FLN1 cells do not suffer cytotoxic effects of the protein-modified material. After introduction of the bioactive Fc-Jagged1 ligand on the material, activation of Notch signaling in HEK293 FLN1 cells was detected on both substrates. The immobilized FcJagged1 ligand elicited a 2.9-fold and 5.7-fold increase in G


Article


pathway and its downstream effects, the issue of compromised cell adhesion on substrates modified with TCO-pG is still present on electrospun meshes, although significantly less severe than on drop cast films. We speculate that the TCOfunctionalization of protein G might have affected the stability of the protein, which in contact with the material surface can undergo structural changes that make it cell-repellent. However, it is still unclear how materials that have been functionalized in exactly equal ways, but have been processed by either solvent casting or electrospinning, lead to drastically different cellular responses (Figures 2B and 4). One explanation might be that during polymer processing many parameters related to the technique can influence the dynamics of the polymer matrix and additive, thus leading to differences in the amount and modes of presentation of additives on the surface. Hence, it is hypothesized that a modified UPy-Tz exposure might be at the origin of the differential biocompatibility of drop cast films and electrospun meshes, which counteracts the cell-repellent effect of TCO-pG in the latter case. Another factor that might contribute to an improved cell adhesion on the electrospun material is the availability of a microporous environment which closely represents the natural cellular environment.60,61 In this case, microstructural parameters might be dominant over surface chemistry in dictating cell adhesion. In this study, the ability of TCO-pG to bind and orient Fcfusion ligands was tested by performing bioactivation of the surface with FcJagged1, a Notch ligand. The results in Figure 3B and Figure S2 show that the reactive immobilization results in a 7.2-fold higher loading of TCO-pG, and a (not significant) 9.6-fold increase in FcJagged1 binding. Nonetheless, no statistical difference in Notch signaling intensity was detected between chemical immobilization and physical adsorption (Figures 4C and 5), even though it is known that Notch signaling activity increases linearly with the concentration of surface-bound FcJagged1 in this cell model.62 One explanation for this might be that the covalently bound TCO-pG does not provide the correct orientation of the Fc-fusion ligand. Improvements on this aspect could be done by developing site-directed protein modification chemistry, thereby providing control on the targeted residues. Regardless, the iEDDACmediated protein immobilization offers the advantage of a covalent anchoring of the protein to the material, thus providing stable functionalization in complex environments such as body fluids. Here, a physically adsorbed protein is susceptible to displacement from the surface by other proteins with larger affinity for the material surface. Taken together, our results represent the first evidence of successful postprocessing bioactivation of a supramolecular UPy-based solid material by means of click chemistry for the immobilization of Fc-fusion ligands. A large number of cytokines, enzymes, and receptor extra-cellular domains are commercially available as Fc-fusion proteins due to advances in the techniques for their large scale production.63 Furthermore, up to date, nine Fc-fusion proteins have been approved as drugs by the FDA, and a large number are currently in clinical trials64 since the Fc domain is often used to prolong the halflife of their conjugate counterpart in vivo or enhance their therapeutic efficacy.65 Besides Fc-fusion proteins, the system described in this work can be potentially used for binding antibodies, which are frequently used in pharmacology to target receptors and cellular processes with high specificity.66 In light of this, it is expected that the development of

luminescence intensity on materials with pG/Fc-Jagged1 and TCO-pG/Fc-Jagged1, respectively (Figure 4C). The mechanism of action of the Notch signaling pathway involves a number of inter- and intracellular processes that occur after ligand−receptor binding, such as endocytosis, glycosylation, and feedback regulation of ligand and receptor levels.56−59 These processes are essential for the translation of the signal into a functional response of the cell; therefore we found it relevant to investigate whether the complexity of the biological process could be recapitulated on the bioactive material, besides the ligand−receptor binding phenomena demonstrated in Figure 4C. Primary human vascular smooth muscle cells endogenously expressing the Notch3 receptor were cultured on UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz electrospun meshes modified with TCO-pG/Fc-Jagged1 to track the expression of genes regulating transcription downstream of NICD translocation to the nucleus, namely, HEY1 and HES1, and genes related to the regulation of ligand and receptor levels, namely, JAG1 and NOTCH3. Gene expression analyses reveal upregulation of expression levels of all the mentioned genes with respect to control samples presenting the TCO-pG/Fc fragment only. Consistently, the addition of DAPT, a γsecretase inhibitor, decreases expression levels for all the investigated genes (Figure 5). Interestingly, the expression

Figure 5. Relative expression of Notch target genes (HEY1, HES1) and lateral positive feedback target genes (JAG1, NOTCH3) on vascular smooth muscle cells cultured on electrospun UPy-PCL/UPyTz, coated with pG (right group) or reacted with TCO-pG (left group). Substrates were functionalized with Fc-Jagged1 and used without (black bars) and with (white bars) inhibition with DAPT. Data are normalized to the scaffold functionalized with the Fc fragment only (dashed line; dotted lines represent the standard error of the control).

intensity of all the investigated genes on TCO-pG/Fc-Jagged1 functionalized substrates is higher than on meshes coated aspecifically with pG/Fc-Jagged1. This might be due to a higher amount of Fc-Jagged1 immobilized on the material surface, as it is shown in Figure 3B that performing the iEDDAC reaction allowed the immobilization of more protein G with respect to random absorption. On the basis of the findings illustrated in Figures 4C and 5, we concluded that a functional cell response can be induced upon introduction of reactive protein G variant that binds to an Fc-fusion protein on supramolecular UPy-PCL. Notwithstanding the successful activation of the Notch signaling H


Article


(2) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. A Stepwise Huisgen Cycloaddition Process Catalyzed by Copper (I): Regioselective Ligation of Azides and Terminal Alkynes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (14), 2596−2599. (3) Zhang, Z.; Yin, L.; Xu, Y.; Tong, R.; Lu, Y.; Ren, J.; Cheng, J. Facile Functionalization of Polyesters through Thiol-Yne Chemistry for the Design of Degradable, Cell-Penetrating and Gene Delivery Dual-Functional Agents. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13 (11), 3456− 3462. (4) Dondoni, A. The Emergence of Thiol-Ene Coupling as a Click Process for Materials and Bioorganic Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (47), 8995−8997. (5) Bacinello, D.; Garanger, E.; Taton, D.; Tam, K. C.; Lecommandoux, S. Enzyme-Degradable Self-Assembled Nanostructures from Polymer-Peptide Hybrids. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15 (5), 1882−1888. (6) Lutolf, M. P.; Hubbell, J. A. Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of End-Linked Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Co-Peptide Hydrogels Formed by Michael-Type Addition. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4 (3), 713−722. (7) Fang, J.; Ye, S. H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, T.; Mo, X.; Wagner, W. R. Thiol Click Modification of Cyclic Disulfide Containing Biodegradable Polyurethane Urea Elastomers. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (5), 1622−1633. (8) Kölmel, D. K.; Kool, E. T. Oximes and Hydrazones in Bioconjugation: Mechanism and Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (15), 10358−10376. (9) Lin, F.; Yu, J.; Tang, W.; Zheng, J.; Defante, A.; Guo, K.; Wesdemiotis, C.; Becker, M. L. Peptide-Functionalized Oxime Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanical Properties and Gelation Behavior. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14 (10), 3749−3758. (10) Takahashi, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Suhara, T.; Omichi, K.; Shimizu, A.; Hasegawa, K.; Kokudo, N.; Ohta, S.; Ito, T. In Situ Cross-Linkable Hydrogel of Hyaluronan Produced via Copper-Free Click Chemistry. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14 (10), 3581−3588. (11) Agard, N. J.; Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. A Strain-Promoted [3 + 2] Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition for Covalent Modification of Biomolecules in Living Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (46), 15046−15047. (12) Yao, J. Z.; Uttamapinant, C.; Poloukhtine, A.; Baskin, J. M.; Codelli, J. A.; Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R.; Popik, V. V.; Ting, A. Y. Fluorophore Targeting to Cellular Proteins via Enzyme-Mediated Azide Ligation and Strain-Promoted Cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (8), 3720−3728. (13) Hansell, C. F.; Espeel, P.; Stamenovic, M. M.; Barker, I. A.; Dove, A. P.; Du Prez, F. E.; O'Reilly, R. K. Additive-Free Clicking for Polymer Functionalization and Coupling by Tetrazine-Norbornene Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (35), 13828−13831. (14) Alge, D. L.; Azagarsamy, M. A.; Donohue, D. F.; Anseth, K. S. Synthetically Tractable Click Hydrogels for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Formed Using Tetrazine-Norbornene Chemistry. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14 (4), 949−953. (15) MejíaOneto, J. M.; Gupta, M.; Leach, J. K.; Lee, M.; Sutcliffe, J. L. Implantable Biomaterial Based on Click Chemistry for Targeting Small Molecules. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10 (12), 5099−5105. (16) Liu, S.; Zhang, H.; Remy, R. A.; Deng, F.; Mackay, M. E.; Fox, J. M.; Jia, X. Meter-Long Multiblock Copolymer Microfibers Via Interfacial Bioorthogonal Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (17), 2783−2790. (17) Zhang, H.; Trout, W. S.; Liu, S.; Andrade, G. A.; Hudson, D. A.; Scinto, S. L.; Dicker, K. T.; Li, Y.; Lazouski, N.; Rosenthal, J.; Thorpe, C.; Jia, X.; Fox, J. M. Rapid Bioorthogonal Chemistry Turnon through Enzymatic or Long Wavelength Photocatalytic Activation of Tetrazine Ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 5978−5983. (18) Taylor, M. T.; Blackman, M. L.; Dmitrenko, O.; Fox, J. M. Design and Synthesis of Highly Reactive Dienophiles for the Tetrazine-Trans-Cyclooctene Ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (25), 9646−9649.

substrates postmodified to incorporate Fc-tagged protein and antibodies will find broad applicability in therapeutic strategies that require processed biomaterials.

■

CONCLUSIONS A versatile and modular platform for introduction of bioactive Fc-fusion proteins on supramolecular solid materials based on UPy was developed via immobilization on Fc-binding protein G. TCO modification of recombinant protein G allowed functionalization of UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz surfaces via a fast iEDDAC reaction. The introduction of TCO-pG on cast or electrospun surfaces turned out to affect the biocompatibility of the material in a processing-dependent manner. Films of UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz functionalized with TCO-pG turned out to be cell-repellent, while mere adsorption of protein G did not compromise cell adhesion. Instead, UPy-PCL/UPy-Tz fibers created by electrospinning supported cell adhesion, viability, and functionality. Bioactivation of supramolecular substrates was carried out by incorporation of Fc-Jagged1, a Notch ligand of interest in tissue regeneration strategies, on the Fc-binding material surface. The Fc-fusion ligand retained its functionality on TCO-pG modified electrospun materials, indicating that complex cellular processes such as Notch signaling can be recapitulated on the modified material in cell models expressing Notch1 and Notch3 receptors. In conclusion, a convenient strategy based on biorthogonal click-chemistry is found to be suitable to modify supramolecular material surfaces. We envision that the system described in this work potentially has broad applications in the display of bioactive proteins, such as Fc-fusion proteins and therapeutic antibodies, onto processed solid materials.

■

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00334. List of primers used for gene expression; fluorescence micrographs of HEK293 FLN1 and CASMC on UPyPCL cast films with adsorbed pG or TCO-pG; quantification of FcJagged1 immobilization on pG or TCO-pG functionalized electrospun meshes (PDF)

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected]. Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Carlijn Bouten is acknowledged for valuable discussions and Maaike Schotman for assistance with CD measurements. The ICMS Animation Studio is acknowledged for the design of some of the cartoons. This work was funded by the European Research Council (FP7/2007-2013) Grant Agreement 604514 and ERC Grant Agreement 308045 and the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science (Gravity Program 024.001.03).

■

REFERENCES

(1) Espeel, P.; Du Prez, F. E. click”-Inspired Chemistry in Macromolecular Science: Matching Recent Progress and User Expectations. Macromolecules 2015, 48 (1), 2−14. I


Article


Immunoprotection of Pancreatic Islets. Biomaterials 2018, 182, 191− 201. (36) Blache, U.; Vallmajo Martin, Q.; Horton, E. R.; Guerrero, J.; Djonov, V.; Scherberich, A.; Erler, J. T.; Martin, I.; Snedeker, J. G.; Milleret, V.; Ehrbar, M. Notch - Inducing Hydrogels Reveal a Perivascular Switch of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19, No. e45964. (37) Roccio, M.; Gobaa, S.; Lutolf, M. P. High-Throughput Clonal Analysis of Neural Stem Cells in Microarrayed Artificial Niches. Integr. Biol. 2012, 4 (4), 391−400. (38) Aster, J. C.; Pear, W. S.; Blacklow, S. C. The Varied Roles of Notch in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol.: Mech. Dis. 2017, 12 (1), 245− 275. (39) Lobry, C.; Oh, P.; Mansour, M. R.; Look, A. T.; Aifantis, I. Notch Signaling: Switching an Oncogene to a Tumor Suppressor. Blood 2014, 123 (16), 2451−2459. (40) Boareto, M.; Jolly, M. K.; Goldman, A.; Pietilä, M.; Mani, S. A.; Sengupta, S.; Ben-Jacob, E.; Levine, H.; Onuchic, J. N. Notch-Jagged Signalling Can Give Rise to Clusters of Cells Exhibiting a Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Phenotype. J. R. Soc., Interface 2016, 13 (118), 20151106. (41) Goor, O. J. G. M.; Keizer, H. M.; Bruinen, A. L.; Schmitz, M. G. J.; Versteegen, R. M.; Janssen, H. M.; Heeren, R. M. A.; Dankers, P. Y. W. Efficient Functionalization of Additives at Supramolecular Material Surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (5), 1604652. (42) Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F. H.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J.; Hirschberg, J. H.; Lange, R. F.; Lowe, J. K.; Meijer, E. W. Reversible Polymers Formed from Self-Complementary Monomers Using Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1997, 278 (5343), 1601−1604. (43) Bosman, A. W.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W. Supramolecular Polymers at Work. Mater. Today 2004, 7, 34−39 April . (44) Goor, O. J. G. M.; Hendrikse, S. I. S.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Meijer, E. W. From Supramolecular Polymers to Multi-Component Biomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (21), 6621−6637. (45) Hutin, M.; Burakowska-Meise, E.; Appel, W. P. J.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Meijer, E. W. From Molecular Structure to Macromolecular Organization: Keys to Design Supramolecular Biomaterials. Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21), 8528−8537. (46) Wisse, E.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Mezari, B.; Magusin, P. C. M. M.; Meijer, E. W. Multicomponent Supramolecular Thermoplastic Elastomer with Peptide-Modified Nanofibers. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2011, 49 (8), 1764−1771. (47) Mollet, B. B.; Comellas-Aragonès, M.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Söntjens, S. H. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Dankers, P. Y. W. A Modular Approach to Easily Processable Supramolecular Bilayered Scaffolds with Tailorable Properties. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2 (17), 2483. (48) Muylaert, D. E. P.; van Almen, G. C.; Talacua, H.; Fledderus, J. O.; Kluin, J.; Hendrikse, S. I. S.; van Dongen, J. L. J.; Sijbesma, E.; Bosman, A. W.; Mes, T.; Thakkar, S. H.; Smits, A. I. P. M.; Bouten, C. V. C.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Verhaar, M. C. Early In-Situ Cellularization of a Supramolecular Vascular Graft Is Modified by Synthetic Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1α Derived Peptides. Biomaterials 2016, 76, 187−195. (49) Pape, A. C. H.; Ippel, B. D.; Dankers, P. Y. W. Cell and Protein Fouling Properties of Polymeric Mixtures Containing Supramolecular Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Additives. Langmuir 2017, 33 (16), 4076− 4082. (50) Goor, O.; Brouns, J.; Dankers, P. Y. W. Introduction of AntiFouling Coatings at the Surface of Supramolecular Elastomeric Materials via Post-Modification of Reactive Supramolecular Additives. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 5228−5238. (51) O’Leary, L. E. R.; Fallas, J. A.; Bakota, E. L.; Kang, M. K.; Hartgerink, J. D. Multi-Hierarchical Self-Assembly of a Collagen Mimetic Peptide from Triple Helix to Nanofibre and Hydrogel. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3 (10), 821−828. (52) Sahlgren, C.; Gustafsson, M. V.; Jin, S.; Poellinger, L.; Lendahl, U. Notch Signaling Mediates Hypoxia-Induced Tumor Cell Migration

(19) Darko, A.; Wallace, S.; Dmitrenko, O.; Machovina, M. M.; Mehl, R. A.; Chin, J. W.; Fox, J. M. Conformationally Strained TransCyclooctene with Improved Stability and Excellent Reactivity in Tetrazine Ligation. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5 (10), 3770−3776. (20) Haun, J. B.; Devaraj, N. K.; Hilderbrand, S. A.; Lee, H.; Weissleder, R. Bioorthogonal Chemistry Amplifies Nanoparticle Binding and Enhances the Sensitivity of Cell Detection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5 (9), 660−665. (21) Zeglis, B. M.; Sevak, K. K.; Reiner, T.; Mohindra, P.; Carlin, S. D.; Zanzonico, P.; Weissleder, R.; Lewis, J. S. A Pretargeted PET Imaging Strategy Based on Bioorthogonal Diels-Alder Click Chemistry. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54 (8), 1389−1396. (22) Kurra, Y.; Odoi, K. A.; Lee, Y. J.; Yang, Y.; Lu, T.; Wheeler, S. E.; Torres-Kolbus, J.; Deiters, A.; Liu, W. R. Two Rapid Catalyst-Free Click Reactions for in Vivo Protein Labeling of Genetically Encoded Strained Alkene/Alkyne Functionalities. Bioconjugate Chem. 2014, 25 (9), 1730−1738. (23) Rondon, A.; Ty, N.; Bequignat, J. B.; Quintana, M.; Briat, A.; Witkowski, T.; Bouchon, B.; Boucheix, C.; Miot-Noirault, E.; Pouget, J. P.; Chezal, J.-M.; Navarro-Teulon, I.; Moreau, E.; Degoul, F. Antibody PEGylation in BioorthogonalPretargeting with TransCyclooctene/Tetrazine Cycloaddition: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Models. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 1−11. (24) Sauer-Eriksson, A. E.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Uhlén, M.; Jones, T. A. Crystal Structure of the C2 Fragment of Streptococcal Protein G in Complex with the Fc Domain of Human IgG. Structure 1995, 3 (3), 265−278. (25) Stone, G. C.; Sjöbring, U.; Björck, L.; Sjöquist, J.; Barber, C. V.; Nardella, F. A. The Fc Binding Site for Streptococcal Protein G Is in the C Gamma 2-C Gamma 3 Interface Region of IgG and Is Related to the Sites That Bind Staphylococcal Protein A and Human Rheumatoid Factors. J. Immunol. 1989, 143 (2), 565−570. (26) Wang, C.; Feng, B. Research Progress on Site-Oriented and Three-Dimensional Immobilization of Protein. Mol. Biol. 2015, 49 (1), 1−20. (27) Czajkowsky, D. M.; Hu, J.; Shao, Z.; Pleass, R. J. Fc-Fusion Proteins: New Developments and Future Perspectives. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4 (10), 1015−1028. (28) Tiemeijer, L. A.; Frimat, J. P.; Stassen, O. M. J. A.; Bouten, C. V. C.; Sahlgren, C. M. Spatial Patterning of the Notch Ligand Dll4 Controls Endothelial Sprouting in Vitro. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 (1), 1−10. (29) Beckstead, B. L.; Santosa, D. M.; Giachelli, C. M. Mimicking Cell- Cell Interactions at the Biomaterial-Cell Interface for Control of Stem Cell Differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2006, 79A (1), 94−103. (30) Wang, X.; Rahil, Z.; Li, I. T. S.; Chowdhury, F.; Leckband, D. E.; Chemla, Y. R.; Ha, T. Constructing Modular and Universal Single Molecule Tension Sensor Using Protein G to Study MechanoSensitive Receptors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1−10. (31) Li, Y.; Hiroi, Y.; Liao, J. K. Notch Signaling as an Important Mediator of Cardiac Repair and Regeneration After Myocardial Infarction. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2010, 20 (7), 228−231. (32) Gude, N. A.; Emmanuel, G.; Wu, W.; Cottage, C. T.; Fischer, K.; Quijada, P.; Muraski, J. A.; Alvarez, R.; Rubio, M.; Schaefer, E.; Sussman, M. E. Activation of Notch-Mediated Protective Signaling in the Myocardium. Circ. Res. 2008, 102 (9), 1025−1035. (33) Sepantafar, M.; Maheronnaghsh, R.; Mohammadi, H.; RajabiZeleti, S.; Annabi, N.; Aghdami, N.; Baharvand, H. Stem Cells and Injectable Hydrogels: Synergistic Therapeutics in Myocardial Repair. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34 (4), 362−379. (34) Boopathy, A. V.; Martinez, M. D.; Smith, A. W.; Brown, M. E.; García, A. J.; Davis, M. E. Intramyocardial Delivery of Notch LigandContaining Hydrogels Improves Cardiac Function and Angiogenesis Following Infarction. Tissue Eng., Part A 2015, 21, 2315−2322. (35) Izadi, Z.; Hajizadeh-Saffar, E.; Hadjati, J.; Habibi-Anbouhi, M.; Ghanian, M. H.; Sadeghi-Abandansari, H.; Ashtiani, M. K.; Samsonchi, Z.; Raoufi, M.; Moazenchi, M.; Izadi, M.; Nejad, A.; Namdari, H.; Tahamtani, Y.; Ostad, S.; Akbari-Javar, H.; Baharvand, H. Tolerance Induction by Surface Immobilization of Jagged-1 for J


Article

ACS Applied Polymer Materials and Invasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105 (17), 6392− 6397. (53) Gustafsson, M. V.; Zheng, X.; Pereira, T.; Gradin, K.; Jin, S.; Lundkvist, J.; Ruas, J. L.; Poellinger, L.; Lendahl, U.; Bondesson, M. Hypoxia Requires Notch Signaling to Maintain the Undifferentiated Cell State. Dev. Cell 2005, 9 (5), 617−628. (54) Manokawinchoke, J.; Nattasit, P.; Thongngam, T.; Pavasant, P.; Tompkins, K. A.; Egusa, H.; Osathanon, T. Indirect Immobilized Jagged1 Suppresses Cell Cycle Progression and Induces Odonto/ Osteogenic Differentiation in Human Dental Pulp Cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 1−19. (55) Goward, C. R.; Irons, L. I.; Murphy, J. P.; Atkinson, T. The Secondary Structure of Protein G’, a Robust Molecule. Biochem. J. 1991, 274, 503−507. (56) Meloty-Kapella, L.; Shergill, B.; Kuon, J.; Botvinick, E.; Weinmaster, G. Notch Ligand Endocytosis Generates Mechanical Pulling Force Dependent on Dynamin, Epsins, and Actin. Dev. Cell 2012, 22 (6), 1299−1312. (57) Haines, N.; Irvine, K. D. Glycosylation Regulates Notch Signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4 (10), 786−797. (58) Manderfield, L. J.; High, F. A.; Engleka, K. A.; Liu, F.; Li, L.; Rentschler, S.; Epstein, J. A. Notch Activation of Jagged1 Contributes to the Assembly of the Arterial Wall. Circulation 2012, 125 (2), 314− 323. (59) Loerakker, S.; Stassen, O. M. J. A.; Ter Huurne, F. M.; Boareto, M.; Bouten, C. V. C.; Sahlgren, C. M. Mechanosensitivity of JaggedNotch Signaling Can Induce a Switch-Type Behavior in Vascular Homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (16), E3682− E3691. (60) Duval, K.; Grover, H.; Han, L.-H.; Mou, Y.; Pegoraro, A. F.; Fredberg, J.; Chen, Z. Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture. Physiology 2017, 32 (4), 266−277. (61) Asthana, A.; White, C. M. R.; Douglass, M.; Kisaalita, W. S. Evaluation of Cellular Adhesion and Organization in Different Microporous Polymeric Scaffolds. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34 (2), 505−514. (62) Putti, M.; Stassen, O. M. J. A.; Schotman, M. J. G.; Sahlgren, C. M.; Dankers, P. Y. W. Influence of the Assembly State on the Functionality of a Supramolecular Jagged1-Mimicking Peptide Additive. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (5), 8178−8187. (63) Flanagan, M. L.; Arias, R. S.; Hu, P.; Khawli, L. a; Epstein, A. L. Soluble Fc Fusion Proteins for Biomedical Research. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 378, 33−52. (64) Linderholm, A. L.; Chamow, S. M. Immunoglobulin Fc-Fusion Proteins Part 1: Their Design and Manufacture. Bioprocess Int. 2014, 12 (9), 30. (65) Kontermann, R. E. Strategies for Extended Serum Half-Life of Protein Therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22 (6), 868−876. (66) Chames, P.; Van Regenmortel, M.; Weiss, E.; Baty, D. Therapeutic Antibodies: Successes, Limitations and Hopes for the Future. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 157 (2), 220−233.

K


A Supramolecular Platform for the Introduction of Fc-Fusion Bioactive

Recommend Documents