Abundance and Light Absorption Properties of Brown Carbon Emitted

Dec 25, 2018 - South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655 , China. Environ. Sci. Technol...
0 downloads 0 Views 417KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Winnipeg Library

Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments

Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from residential coal combustion in China Meiju Li, Xingjun Fan, Mengbo Zhu, Chunlin Zou, Jianzhong Song, Siye Wei, Wanglu Jia, and Ping'an Peng Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05630 • Publication Date (Web): 25 Dec 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 26, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Abundances and light absorption properties of brown carbon emitted from

2

residential coal combustion in China

3 4

Meiju Li1,3, Xingjun Fan2,4, Mengbo Zhu1,3, Chunlin Zou1,3, Jianzhong Song1*, Siye Wei1,5,

5

Wanglu Jia1, Ping’an Peng1,3

6

1State

7

of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of

8

Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China

9

2College

Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory

of Resource and Environment, Anhui Science and Technology University, Anhui

10

233100, China

11

3University

12

4Anhui

13

233400, China

14

5South

15

Guangzhou 510655, China

of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Province Key Laboratory of Biochar and Cropland Pollution Prevention, Bengbu

China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection,

16 17 18

* Correspondence to: Jianzhong Song ([email protected])

19 20

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 35

21 22

TOC Art

23 24 25

UV-Vis absorption

26

28

Multi-solvent Extraction

2 Specific absorbance (m /gC)

27

YL (chunk)

0.12

WSOC HULISw ASOC MSOC

0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02

29

0.00 250

300

350

400

Wavelength (nm)

30 31 32 33 34 35

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

450

500

Page 3 of 35

36

Environmental Science & Technology

ABSTRACT

37

Brown carbon (BrC) fractions, including water soluble organic carbon (WSOC), water

38

soluble humic-like substances (HULISw), alkaline soluble organic carbon (ASOC) and

39

methanol soluble organic carbon (MSOC) were extracted from particles emitted from the

40

residential combustion of coal with different geological maturities. The abundances and light

41

absorption properties of these BrC fractions were comprehensively studied. The results

42

showed that the abundances of the different constituents of the BrC fraction varied greatly

43

with the extraction solvent, accounting for 4.3%–46%, 2.3%–23%, 3.2%–14%, and 76%–

44

98% of the total carbon content in particles. The specific UV-Vis absorbance (SUVA254) of

45

BrC fractions followed the order of MSOC > ASOC > HULISw > WSOC. The WSOC and

46

MSOC fractions from the combustion of low maturity coal had relatively low SUVA254 and

47

high SR values. The mass absorption efficiencies (MAE365) for ASOC and MSOC were

48

higher than for WSOC, and WSOC and MSOC from low maturity coal combustion had

49

relatively low levels of light absorption. These findings indicated that coal combustion is a

50

potential source of atmospheric BrC and the abundance and light absorption of the coal

51

combustion-derived BrC fractions were strongly dependent on the extraction methods used

52

and the coal maturity rather than the coal shapes.

53 54

INTRODUCTION

55

In recent decades, a type of light absorbing organic carbon (OC) has received much

56

global attention because of its significant effects on atmospheric chemistry, air quality, and

57

climate change.1-3 This organic fraction is commonly referred as brown carbon (BrC), and is 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 35

58

strongly wavelength dependent, mainly absorbing light in the low wavelength visible and

59

near ultraviolet regions.1, 4-9 The chemical composition of BrC is very complex, the physical,

60

chemical, and optical properties of BrC vary greatly depending on the sources.2, 4, 9, 10 Many

61

studies have demonstrated that the sources of atmospheric BrC are mainly primary emissions

62

from the incomplete combustion of biomass and fossil fuels

63

formation processes.

64

considered to be the most significant source of atmospheric BrC.

65

coal) are consumed in substantial amounts around the world, and are also believed to

66

contribute significantly to atmospheric BrC.

67

comprehensively investigate BrC materials emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels to

68

better understand the impact of these anthropogenic emissions on the atmospheric

69

environment and climate change.

2, 12, 13

1, 4, 7, 10, 11

and secondary

Among the primary sources, biomass burning (BB) is generally

10,

15

10, 11, 14

Fossil fuels (e.g.,

Therefore, it is necessary to

70

In some countries, including China, coal is the dominant fuel used for energy production.

71

According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016), coal consumption (4000 Tg)

72

accounts for 68% of China’s total primary energy, ~ 93 Tg of which is used as fuel for

73

households throughout the year.16 Because of the poor combustion conditions and lack of

74

emission control facilities, the widespread use of coal for residential purposes can lead to

75

huge emissions of carbonaceous particles, including OC, black carbon (BC), and polycyclic

76

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

77

BrC released from coal combustion.

78

abundance and optical properties in ambient aerosols and BB aerosols.

79

gaps in our knowledge regarding the abundance, chemistry, and optical properties of primary

14, 15, 17, 18

However, there have been few studies of primary

10, 15

Most current studies of BrC have focused on its

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

19-22

There are still

Page 5 of 35

80

Environmental Science & Technology

BrC from coal combustion, especially in the residential sector.

81

BrC contains a complex mixture of light absorbing organic compounds, which can be

82

extracted and separated from the insoluble residues. The solvent-extractable BrC fraction can

83

then be measured with UV–Vis spectrometry and high-resolution mass spectrometry, and so

84

on. 4, 23, 24 This approach has the advantage of excluding interference from BC and providing

85

the complete absorption spectra of BrC, but also has some limitations, such as the inability of

86

water and even organic solvents (e.g., methanol and acetone) to extract all of the organic

87

species.4,

88

studies. 4, 23-26 For example, pure water is commonly used as an extraction solvent to separate

89

water soluble OC (WSOC) and water soluble humic like substance (HULISw) from the other

90

fractions in atmospheric aerosols. For samples of atmospheric particles, alkaline solutions

91

and organic solvents have been found to extract more light absorbing organic substances than

92

pure water.

93

solvents are generally different. It has been reported that methanol soluble OC (MSOC) has a

94

higher light absorbing ability than WSOC in atmospheric aerosols and smoke particles. 4, 23-25

95

Therefore, to fully investigate BrC in smoke particles, an intensive extraction with water,

96

alkaline solution, and organic solvent is necessary.

25

Despite this, the approach has been frequently used to separate BrC in many

4, 23, 27

The chemical and optical properties of BrC extracted using different

97

The aim of this study was to further understand the abundance and optical properties of

98

primary BrC emitted from household coal combustion in China. For this purpose, smoke

99

particles emitted from the combustion of household coal, with low to high geological

100

maturity, were collected in a laboratory sampling system. Two shapes of each type of coal

101

were tested: raw-coal chunks and honeycomb briquettes. The extractable BrC fractions in 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

102

particles were extracted and isolated with water, alkaline solution, and organic solvent. Then,

103

their abundance, and optical properties were determined using a total organic carbon (TOC)

104

analyzer and UV-Vis spectroscopy. As a laboratory controlled study, the work was easier to

105

control and repeat than field tests, which allowed us to test the effects of coal maturity and

106

briquettes by fixing other conditions. The information obtained will enable a better

107

understanding of primary BrC emitted from household coal combustion, and its role in the

108

importance to the atmospheric environment and climate change.

109 110

MATERIALS AND METHODS

111

Coal samples. Six coal samples were prepared for the study (Table S1). They consisted

112

of five bituminous coals (Yulin [YL], Shuangyashan [SYS], Yongcheng-1 [YC-1],

113

Yongcheng-2 [YC-2], Hebi [HB]), and one anthracitic coal (Jiaozuo [JZ]). These six coals

114

covered a wide range of geological maturities (vitrinite reflectance (Ro), 0.55%–2.0%) (Table

115

S1) and were selected to be representative of residential coals in China.

116

Each type of coal was prepared in samples of two shapes: a raw-coal chunk and a

117

honeycomb briquette. They were combusted in traditional chunk and briquette stoves. The

118

details of the two household stoves are presented in the SI (Figure S1).

119

Collection of particle samples from coal combustion. The particle samples emitted

120

from residential coal combustion were collected in a laboratory sampling system, the details

121

of which are given in the SI (see Section S2, Figures S1 and S2).

122

Extraction and fractionation of BrC. In this study, the BrC fractions (WSOC,

123

HULISw, alkaline soluble OC (ASOC), and MSOC) were obtained using solvent extraction 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

124

and solid-phase extraction isolation methods. Although these four BrC fractions (WSOC,

125

HULISw, ASOC, and MSOC) contained not only the light absorbing BrC fractions but also a

126

certain quantity of non-light-absorbing OC, they have been widely accepted and used as

127

surrogates for BrC.

128

provided in Figure S3 and section S3 in the SI.

4, 6, 22-24, 28

The details of the analytical procedures used in the study are

129

The TC content of smoke samples and the OC content of HULISw, WSOC, and ASOC

130

solutions were measured using a thermal-optical carbon analyzer and a high-temperature

131

catalytic oxidation instrument, respectively.

132

Measurement of UV-Vis spectra. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the BrC solutions

133

(WSOC, HULISw, ASOC, and MSOC) were measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer

134

(UV-2600, Shimadzu) between the wavelengths of 200 to 700 nm. To characterize the

135

chemical and optical properties of BrC, the absorbance at 250 nm (UV250), specific UV-Vis

136

absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254), slope ratio (SR), absorption Ångström exponent (AAE),

137

and the mass absorption efficiencies at 365 nm (MAE365) of BrC fractions were calculated.

138

The details of calculation are presented in section S5 in the SI.

139 140

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

141

Abundances of WSOC, HULISw, ASOC, and MSOC in smoke particles. Table 1

142

shows the average abundances of WSOC, HULISw, ASOC, and MSOC in coal smoke

143

particles. The WSOC was obtained by direct extraction, and the average contribution of

144

WSOC to the TC of smoke particles was 4.3%–16% for bituminous coal and 24%–46% for

145

anthracite, respectively. This result for bituminous coal was comparable to the WSOC result 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

10

Page 8 of 35

146

(11.2%) for household coal reported in our previous study,

147

WSOC results (14%–56%) for BB smoke PM2.5 samples.

148

WSOC for bituminous coal than anthracite could be ascribed to the fact that the bituminous

149

coal contained higher concentrations of volatile and semi-volatile hydrophobic aromatic

150

organic components than anthracite.

151

emitted from bituminous coal combustion containing a relatively high content of water

152

insoluble

153

nitrogen/sulfur-containing heteroatomic PAHs. 29, 30

organic

compounds,

15, 29

but lower than the reported

10, 11

The lower contribution of

These differences might result in the particles

such

as

hydrophobic

parent

PAHs

and

154

The ASOC fraction was subsequently extracted by an alkaline solution extraction of the

155

residue particles after the water extraction. As shown in Table 1, the average contributions of

156

ASOC to TC in coal smoke particles were 3.3%–14% and 3.2%–6.8% for coal chunks and

157

briquettes, respectively. These results suggest that ASOC was an important organic material

158

in coal combustion emissions and could potentially contribute to the ASOC fraction in the

159

atmospheric aerosol. There was a lesser contribution of ASOC in the smoke from bituminous

160

coal chunks than in anthracite chunks, but no significant differences were observed in the

161

smoke from bituminous coal briquettes and anthracite briquettes. Moreover, the sum of the

162

WSOC and ASOC levels were investigated, and were termed BrC extractable by inorganic

163

solvents. The contribution of WSOC + ASOC to TC in smoke particles was 8.3%–59% and

164

8.0%–29% for coal chunks and briquettes, respectively (Table 1). The MSOC fraction is often seen as a BrC surrogate in the atmospheric environment.6, 9,

165 166

24

167

smoke particles for coal chunks and briquettes, respectively. These large contributions were

As shown in Table 1, the MSOC fraction accounted for 76%–97 and 95%–98% of TC in

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

168

comparable with the data (>90%) for particles from BB reported by Chen and Bond (2010).4

169

In addition, MSOC has been reported to account for ~90% of the OC in Beijing winter

170

aerosols.24 The enrichment of MSOC in particles may be the result of the considerable

171

amounts of OC rather than the elemental carbon produced during the combustion of coal in

172

household stoves during winter.

173

HULISw are important hydrophobic compounds within the WSOC in ambient aerosols,

174

and have received much attention in recent years.20,

26, 31, 32

175

HULISw/WSOC (%) values in smoke particles are 30%–63% and 42%–71% based on the

176

TOC and UV250 measurements, respectively (Figure S4). This indicates that HULISw was

177

the major component of WSOC in smoke particles. These figures were comparable to the

178

results (46  2.1% by TOC measurement and 64  3.9% by UV250 measurement) for coal

179

smoke particles reported in our previous study.10 In terms of TOC content, they were slightly

180

lower compared to the values (57%–66%) reported for smoke particles from the burning of

181

rice straw, corn straw, and pine branches10, 11 and the range of 63%–76% reported for ambient

182

aerosols heavily impacted by tropical BB.33 In addition, the values of HULISw/WSOC ratios

183

determined with UV250 measurements were always higher than those obtained by TOC

184

measurements, which could be due to the enrichment of strongly light absorbing compounds

185

in the HULISw fraction as suggested in previous studies. 10, 26, 34, 35

In the present study, the

186

The influence of extraction solvents on the abundances of BrC fractions. As shown

187

in Table 1, the average abundances of the coal smoke BrC fractions quantified with water,

188

alkaline solution, and methanol were very different. MSOC accounted for almost all of the

189

TC, ranging from 93% to 98% for bituminous coal and 76% to 98% for anthracite. The 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

190

abundances of the MSOC fraction were significantly higher than that of the WSOC and

191

ASOC fractions and even much higher than the sum of the WSOC and ASOC fractions. This

192

indicated that most of the organic compounds in smoke particles were soluble in pure

193

methanol, but were insoluble in water and alkaline solutions. These organic fractions

194

accounted for 72%–89% of the TC for bituminous coal and for 16%–69% of the TC for

195

anthracite, respectively. The results indicated that methanol was the most effective solvent to

196

extract OC. However, the chemical and optical properties of BrC extracted with different

197

solvents are generally different and therefore play different roles in the atmospheric

198

environment. For example, the water soluble BrC fractions (WSOC and HULIS) can directly

199

absorb light and will also have indirect climate effects by enhancing the ability of aerosol

200

particles to act as cloud condensation nuclei.36 Organic solvents, especially methanol, have

201

been found to extract much greater amounts of light absorbing organic substances than water.

202

Therefore, to better understand BrC fractions in particles, multiple solvent extractions of BrC

203

are necessary.

204

A significant positive correlation was found between coal maturity and the differences in

205

BrC fractions (HULISwWSOC, ASOCWSOC, and MSOCWSOC) (r = 0.706, 0.497,

206

0.605, p < 0.01; Table S4). In addition, there was a strong negative correlation between the

207

maturity and volatile matter content of the coals (r = 0.952, p ASOC >

277

HULISw > WSOC. The MSOC fraction contained many more strongly light absorbing 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 14 of 35

278

compounds (i.e., aromatic and conjugated systems) than the ASOC, HULISw, and WSOC

279

fractions. As a hydrophobic component of WSOC, HULISw had a relatively higher

280

normalized absorbance than WSOC. Therefore it is obvious that the optical properties of

281

extractable primary BrC varied significantly depending on the solvents. This indicates the

282

need to use multiple solvents, including water, alkaline solutions, and organic solvents, for

283

the extraction of BrC from smoke particles and for further investigating their chemical and

284

optical properties.

285

In addition to the absorbing intensities, the shapes of the UV-Vis spectra were different,

286

especially within the UV region. As an example, a clear peak in the region of 250 to 300 nm

287

was observed in the UV-Vis spectra of the BrC fractions including WSOC, HULISw, ASOC,

288

and MSOC for coal YL (raw-chunks), although the peak positions were different. This peak

289

in the spectra of the WSOC and HULISw fractions was located at ~275 nm; however, it

290

shifted to a lower wavelength (~255 mm) for the ASOC and MSOC fractions. This difference

291

in the absorbing peak may indicate that some weakly conjugated compounds were contained

292

within the MSOC and ASOC fractions.

293

SUVA254 and SR. Spectroscopic parameters, such as SUVA254 and SR, obtained from

294

UV-Vis spectra, have been found to be correlated with the aromaticity and MW of natural

295

humic acids, WSOC, and HULIS in ambient aerosols.26,

296

SUVA254 values were 2.6–4.6, 3.1–4.9, 4.3–7.5, and 6.8–13 m2/gC for WSOC, HULISw,

297

ASOC, and MSOC from the combustion of bituminous coal and 3.4–4.6, 4.5–5.6, 4.9–7.8,

298

and 10–15 m2/gC for anthracite coal, respectively. The SUVA254 values of coal smoke

299

HULISw are generally higher than those of atmospheric HULISw10, 26, 35, suggesting that coal

35, 43, 46

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

In the present study, the

Page 15 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

300

combustion derived HULIS may contain more aromatic structures. For each type of coal, the

301

SUVA254 values of the extracted BrC fractions followed the order of WSOC < ASOC