Subscriber access provided by CMU Libraries - http://library.cmich.edu
Article
ACCUMULATION OF RUTIN AND BETULINIC ACID AND EXPRESSION OF PHENYLPROPANOID AND TRITERPENOID BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN MULBERRY (Morus alba L.) Shicheng Zhao, Chang Ha Park, Xiaohua Li, Yeon Bok Kim, Jingli Yang, Gyoo Byung Sung, Nam Il Park, Soonok Kim, and Sang Un Park J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03221 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Sep 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 14, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
ACCUMULATION OF RUTIN AND BETULINIC ACID AND
2
EXPRESSION
3
TRITERPENOID BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN MULBERRY
4
(Morus alba L.)
OF
PHENYLPROPANOID
AND
5
Shicheng Zhao,† Chang Ha Park,† Xiaohua Li,† Yeon Bok Kim, ‡ Jingli Yang∥, Gyoo
6
Byung Sung⊥, Nam Il Park§, Soonok Kim,# and Sang Un Park†,*
7 8
†
9
Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-764, Korea.
Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro,
10
‡
11
Science (NIHHS), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Bisanro 92, Eumseong,
12
Chungbuk, 369-873, Korea
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Department of Herbal Crop Research, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal
∥
State Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Northeast Forestry
University, 26 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China ⊥
Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science,
Rural Development Administration, Wanju 565-851, Korea §
Deptartment of Plant Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University 7 Jukheon-gil,
Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do 210-702, Korea #
Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of
Biological Resources, Incheon 404-170, Korea
21 22 23
*
24
S. U. Park
25 26 27
Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 305-764, Korea. Phone: +82-42-821-5730. Fax: +82-42-822-2631. E-mail:
[email protected] To whom correspondence should be addressed
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
28
ABSTRACT
29
Mulberry (Morus alba L.) is used in traditional Chinese medicine and is the sole food
30
source of the silkworm. Here, nine cDNAs encoding phenylpropanoid biosynthetic
31
genes and 21 cDNAs encoding triterpene biosynthetic genes were isolated from
32
mulberry. The expression levels of genes involved in these biosynthetic pathways, and
33
the accumulation of rutin, betulin, and betulinic acid, important secondary metabolites,
34
were investigated in different plant organs. Most phenylpropanoid and triterpene
35
biosynthetic genes were highly expressed in leaves and/or fruit, and most genes were
36
downregulated during fruit ripening. The accumulation of rutin was more than 5-fold
37
higher in leaves than in other organs, and more betulin and betulinic acid were found
38
in roots and leaves than in fruit. By comparing the contents of these compounds with
39
gene expression levels, we speculate that MaUGT78D1 and MaLUS play important
40
regulatory roles in the rutin and betulin biosynthetic pathways.
41
KEYWORDS: mulberry, rutin, betulin, betulinic acid, gene expression
42
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 31
Page 3 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
43
INTRODUCTION
44
In plants, the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway produces many physiologically
45
active secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, lignins, isoflavonoids, and
46
anthocyanins,1 which perform a wide array of important functions. Flavonoids are
47
especially important in plant growth and development; they help to determine flower
48
and fruit color, protect against UV irradiation, and facilitate nitrogen fixation.
49
Flavonoids also have human health benefits including anticancer and antioxidant
50
properties.2 Rutin is an important flavonoid compound with functions that include
51
anticancer, anti-aging, and dietary effects. Rutin and rutin biosynthesis genes have
52
been well studied in buckwheat.3
53
Triterpenoids are another group of plant secondary metabolites. The pharmaceutical
54
and physiological activities of triterpenoids are diverse and important and include
55
antinociceptive, antidiabetic, anti-HIV, and antioxidant properties.4-7 Betulin and
56
betulinic acid are important triterpenoids that are distributed in plant bark. There has
57
been increasing study of betulin and betulinic acid because of their effectiveness
58
against a variety of tumors.8-10
59
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis starts with the formation of the aromatic amino acid
60
phenylalanine (Figure 1a). Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) is the first enzyme in
61
the phenylpropanoid pathway and catalyzes the conversion of phenylalanine into
62
cinnamic acid. Then, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), catalyzes the transcinnamic
63
acid hydroxylate into p-coumaric acid; 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL) then catalyzes
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 31
64
the conversion of p-coumaric acid to p-coumaroyl-CoA, which is the precursor for
65
many phenylpropanoid products, such as lignins and flavonoids. Subsequently,
66
chalcone synthase (CHS) catalyzes the production of a naringenin chalcone, which is
67
the precursor for all flavonoids. In the next step, chalcone isomerase (CHI) converts
68
naringenin chalcone to naringenin. Afterward, naringenin is converted to
69
dihydrokaempferol by flavone 3-hydroxylase (F3H); then, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase
70
(F3′H) catalyzes the transformation of dihydrokaempferol to quercetin. Finally,
71
quercetin is converted to isoquercitrin and rutin by flavonol 3-O-glucosyltransferase
72
(F3GT)
73
respectively.
74
Triterpene biosynthesis is derived from the mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway and the
75
2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway at the initial period (Figure 1b).
76
These pathways generate the same products: isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and
77
dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). Then, geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS)
78
catalyzes the condensation of IPP and DMAPP to form geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP).
79
GPP then unites with another molecule of IPP to from farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP)
80
catalyzed by farnesyl pyrophosphate synthetase. Next, squalene synthase (SQS) and
81
squalene epoxide (SQE) catalyze two NADPH-requiring reactions to form squalene
82
and 2,3-oxidosqualene, respectively; 2,3-oxidosqualene is the common precursor of
83
triterpenes
84
2,3-oxidosqualene is converted to lupeol by lupeol synthase (LUP), and betulinic acid
85
is derived from lupeol followed by successive oxidation at the C-28 position by the
and
flavonol-3-O-glucoside
through
different
pathways.
L-rhamnosyltransferase
In
betulinic
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
acid
(UGT78D1),
biosynthesis,
Page 5 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
86
cytochrome P450 family.
87
Mulberry (Morus alba L., Moraceae) is used in traditional Chinese medicine and is
88
the sole food source of the silkworm. The medicinal value of mulberry derives from
89
the many important secondary metabolites compounds it produces and includes
90
protection against liver damage and antidiabetic, antioxidant, anticancer and
91
anti-fever effects.11-17 Secondary metabolites produced by M. alba include flavonoid
92
compounds18-20 such as anthocyanin and rutin,16, 21 which have strong antioxidant and
93
anti-inflammatory effects.22, 23
94
Mulberry contains many more phenolic and flavonoid compounds than other fruits
95
and vegetables.24 Some studies have assessed the rutin content in mulberry leaves,25, 26
96
but the contents of betulin and betulinic acid have not been evaluated for this plant.
97
Although the draft genome sequence has been reported for another mulberry species,
98
Morus notabilis,27 and most phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthetic genes have
99
been identified, currently, the genetic background is not clear for M. alba. In a
100
previous study, our group sequenced the transcriptome of M. alba L. by using an NGS
101
sequencing platform (unpublished), which is the first report of transcriptome analysis
102
for M. alba. Here, we investigated the expression levels of genes related to
103
phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthesis with reference to this transcriptome data
104
and analyzed the rutin and betulinic acid contents in different organs by using
105
quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and high-performance liquid chromatography
106
(HPLC), respectively. Our results are expected to provide baseline information toward
107
elucidating the mechanism of astragaloside biosynthesis in M. alba.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
MATERIALS AND METHODS
109
Plant Materials. M. alba plants were grown at the experimental farm of National
110
Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (Wanju, Korea).
111
The fruits, flowers, leaves, stems and roots were excised from mature plants. The
112
samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C and/or
113
freeze-dried for RNA isolation and/or HPLC analysis.
114
RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis. Samples (200 mg) of different organs of M.
115
alba L. were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. RNA was isolated
116
separately using a Plant Total RNA Mini Kit (Geneaid, Taiwan) according to the
117
manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of total extracted RNA
118
were determined by 1.2% formaldehyde RNA agarose gel electrophoresis and
119
NanoVue Plus spectrophotometer analysis (code No. 28956058, GE Healthcare, UK),
120
respectively. For cDNA synthesis, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed (RT)
121
using a ReverTra Ace-R kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and oligo (dT) 20 primer
122
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A 20-fold dilution of 20 µL of the resulting
123
cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR.
124
Sequence Analysis. To identify the phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthetic gene
125
sequences in our mulberry NGS database, all generated sequences were blasted with
126
related phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes in GenBank using BioEdit version 7.0.9.0.
127
The deduced amino acid sequences of the phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthetic
128
genes were analyzed for homology by blasting the GenBank database. Identified gene
129
sequences were submitted to GenBank.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 31
Page 7 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
130
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Based on the published gene
131
sequences of MaPAL1, MaPAL2, MaPAL3, MaC4H1, MaC4H2, Ma4CL2, Ma4CL7-1,
132
Ma4CL7-2, Ma4CL9, MaCHS1, MaCHS2, MaCHS3, MaCHS9, MaCHI1, MaCHI2,
133
MaCHI3, MaF3H, MaF3′H1, MaF3′H2, MaF3GT, and MaUGT78D1 (accession
134
numbers
135
biosynthesis, and MaAACT1, MaAACT2, MaHMGS, MaHMGR1, MaHMGR2,
136
MaMVK, MaPMK, MaMVD, MaIDI, MaDXS, MaDXR, MaMCT, MaCMK, MaMCS,
137
MaHDS, MaIDS, MaGPPS, MaFPPS, MaSQS, MaSQE, MaLUP (accession numbers
138
KR080458–KR080471, KR132245–KR132251), real-time PCR primers were
139
designed
140
(Supplementary file Table S1). The expression of these genes was calculated by
141
relative quantification with the actin housekeeping gene (accession number KJ616403)
142
of M. alba as a reference. For quantification of the standard, PCR products amplified
143
from cDNA were purified, and the concentration of the products was measured to
144
calculate the number of cDNA copies. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was
145
performed in a 20 µL reaction mixture including 5 µL of template cDNA, 10 µL of 1×
146
SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), 0.5 µL of each
147
primer (10 µL), and DEPC-treated water. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows:
148
95 °C for 15 min and 41 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 30 s.
149
The PCR reactions were performed on a CFX96 Real-Time system (Bio-Rad
150
Laboratories, Hercules, CA). PCR products were analyzed with the Bio-Rad CFX
151
Manager 2.0 software. Three replications per sample were used for the real-time PCR
KJ616395–KJ616404,
using
the
Primer
KT630878-KT630889)
3
website
for
phenylpropanoid
(http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
152
analysis, and values were expressed as means ± SD.
153
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis. Different organs of M. Alba
154
L. were freeze-dried at –80 °C for 48 h and then ground into a fine powder using a
155
mortar and pestle. Rutin was released from the samples (50 mg) by adding 3 mL of 80%
156
methanol containing 0.1% ascorbic acid (w/v) at 60 °C for 1 h. After centrifuging
157
(3000 ×g) the extract, the supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 µm Acrodisc syringe
158
filter (Pall Corp.; Port Washington, NY) and analyzed by HPLC. The
159
phenylpropanoids were separated on a C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; RStech,
160
Daejeon, Korea) using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Massy,
161
France) equipped with a photodiode array detector. The mobile phase consisted of
162
methanol, water, and 0.2% acetic acid, and the column was maintained at 30 °C. The
163
flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 µL, and the
164
detection wavelength was 280 nm. Pentacyclic triterpene were released from the M.
165
alba samples (500 mg) by adding 5 mL 95% methanol containing 250 µL 1%
166
hydrogen chloride, sonicating for 15 min, and then allowing to stand for 30 min. After
167
centrifugation and filtration, pentacyclic triterpenes were separated on a ProntoSIL
168
120-5 C18 ace-EPS (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; ProntoSIL, Bollinger, Germany) using a
169
Futex NS-4000 HPLC system (Futex Chromatography, Daejeon, Korea). The mobile
170
phase consisted of acetonitrile and water (9:1); the column was maintained at 25 °C,
171
the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 µL, and the detection
172
wavelength was 210 nm. The concentrations of compounds were determined by using
173
a standard curve. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Values were expressed as
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 31
Page 9 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
174
means ± SD.
175
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
176
Sequence Analyses of Phenylpropanoid and Triterpene Biosynthetic Genes from
177
Mulberry. Full-length cDNAs encoding PAL1, PAL2, C4H1, C4H2, 4CL7-1, 4CL7-2,
178
CHS3, CHI1, CHI3 AACT1, AACT2, HMGS, PMK, MVD, IDI, DXS, MCS, HDS,
179
IDS, GPPS, SQE, and LUS, and partial-length cDNA clones encoding PAL3, 4CL2,
180
4CL9, CHS1, CHS2, CHS9, CHI2, F3H, F3′H1, F3′H2 F3GT, UGT78D1, HMGR1,
181
HMGR2, MVK, DXR, MCT, CMK, FPPS, and SQS were identified. They were
182
confirmed for homology with the BLAST program and designated as MaPAL1 (722
183
amino acids [aa]), MaPAL2 (749 aa), MaPAL3 (344 aa), MaC4H1 (525 aa), MaC4H2
184
(507 aa), Ma4CL2 (365 aa), Ma4CL7-1 (547 aa), Ma4CL7-2 (539 aa), Ma4CL9 (471
185
aa), MaCHS1 (257 aa), MaCHS2 (259 aa), MaCHS3 (399 aa), MaCHS9 (218 aa),
186
MaCHI1 (228 aa). MaCHI2 (308 aa), MaCHI3 (208 aa), MaF3H (228 aa), MaF3′H1
187
(354 aa), MaF3′H2 (177 aa), MaF3GT (339 aa), MaUGT78D1 (447 aa), MaAACT1
188
(403 aa), MaAACT2 (416 aa), MaHMGS (464 aa), MaHMGR1 (548 aa), MaHMGR2
189
(586 aa), MaMVK (356 aa), MaPMK (507 aa), MaMVD (421 aa), MaIDI (295 aa),
190
MaDXS (714 aa), MaDXR (363 aa), MaMCT (243 aa), MaCMK (254 aa), MaMCS
191
(248 aa), MaHDS (740 aa), MaIDS (461 aa), MaGPPS (380 aa), MaFPPS (182 aa),
192
MaSQS (408 aa), MaSQE (524 aa), and LcLUS (754 aa). The data provided in Tables
193
1 and 2 showed that the mulberry phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthetic genes
194
exhibited high identity with other orthologous genes.
195
Expression of Phenylpropanoid and Triterpene Biosynthetic Genes in Mulberry.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
196
The expression of phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthetic genes was analyzed in
197
roots, stems, and leaves, and in three fruit stages (unripe: fruits-1, semi-ripe: fruits-2,
198
and fully ripe: fruits-3) by qRT-PCR (Figure 2). The expression patterns of
199
phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes differ among species.28-32 In M. alba, the
200
expression level of three isoform PAL genes were different, MaPAL1 was expressed at
201
the highest levels in stems and fully ripe fruits, however, MaPAL2 and MaPAL3 were
202
highly expressed in leaves. The expression level of MaC4H1 was the highest in the
203
stems than in the other organs, while the expression level of MaC4H2 was similar in
204
all mulberry organs. The expression levels of Ma4CL2 and Ma4CL9 were high in
205
unripe fruits; Ma4CL7-1 was highly expressed in the leaves, and Ma4CL7-2 was
206
highly expressed in the roots. MaCHS1 showed high expression level in fruits;
207
MaCHS2 was highly expressed in the leaves and unripe fruits, intermediately
208
expressed in semi- and fully ripe fruits, and showed low expression in the roots and
209
stems; however, MaCHS9 was highly expressed in the root. MaCHI1 was highly
210
expressed in the leaves, whereas MaCHI2 and MaCHI3 was mainly expressed in the
211
fruits. The expression patterns of MaF3H, MaF3′H1, and MaF3GT were similar, with
212
relatively higher expression in fruits than in roots, stems, and leaves. However,
213
MaF3′H2 was different with MaF3′H1, with the highest expression level in roots.
214
MaUGT78D1 showed significantly higher expression in leaves than in other organs.
215
During fruit ripening, the expression of MaPAL2, MaPAL3, MaC4H2, Ma4CL,
216
MaCHS2, MaCHS3, MaCHS9 and MaCHI3 declined gradually. In contrast, the
217
expression of MaPAL1, MaCHS1, MaCHI, MaF3H, MaF3′H, and MaF3GT increased
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 31
Page 11 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
218
gradually as fruit ripened. In the triterpene biosynthetic pathway, most genes were
219
highly expressed in leaves (Figure 3). During the fruit development, the expression of
220
most triterpene biosynthetic genes decreased, including that of MaAACT2, MaHMGS,
221
MaHMGR1, MaHMGR2, MaMVK, MaMVD, MaDXS, MaDXR, MaMCT, MaCMK,
222
MaMCS, MaHDS, MaIDS, MaGPPS, and MaLUS. MaIDI, MaPMK were expressed at
223
the same level in the three fruit-ripening stages. In contrast, MaAACT1, MaFPPS,
224
MaSQS, and MaSQE showed increased expression during ripening. Possibly, these
225
genes were relative with fruit maturation.
226
There are various explanations for the diverse expression levels of phenylpropanoid
227
biosynthetic genes among plant species, including the existence of different gene
228
isoforms in different organs. Xu et al.33 cloned three isoforms of PAL in Scutellaria
229
baicalensis and found different transcript levels in different organs. Expression of
230
isoform SbPAL1 was highest in stems, SbPAL2 was highest in leaves, and SbPAL3
231
expression was highest in roots. Li et al.28 compared two isoforms of 4CL in
232
buckwheat and found that Fe4CL1 was most strongly expressed in roots, while
233
Fe4CL2 had the highest expression in stems. Biotic and abiotic environmental factors
234
can also influence phenylpropanoid gene expression due to the protective function of
235
phenylpropanoid compounds. Ozone can modify phenylpropanoid and lignin
236
expression pathways in leaves and stems of poplar.34 Gene expression in leaves was
237
stimulated by ozone exposure, but in stems, gene expression was decreased by ozone.
238
Xu et al.33 also found that different concentrations of methyl jasmonate (a plant
239
hormone) and wounding treatments affected the transcript levels of phenylpropanoid
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
240
genes.
241
A few reports have examined differences in transcription levels of triterpene
242
biosynthetic genes in different plant organs. Huang et al.35 investigated the expression
243
of amyrin synthase (AS) and amyrin oxidase (AO) in Catharanthus roseus and found
244
that both genes were more highly expressed in leaves. Here, we isolated 21 triterpene
245
biosynthesis-related genes and examined their expression levels in different organs.
246
Similarly, we found that most genes were highly expressed in leaves. The
247
transcription level of MaLUS was very high in leaves and roots, which was related to
248
higher levels of betulin and betulinic acid in these organs. We propose that MaLUS is
249
the key regulator of betulin and betulinic acid accumulation in mulberry; however,
250
further studies are needed to confirm this.
251
Rutin, Betulin, and Betulinic Acid Content. Mulberry fruit have been used for
252
centuries as food, tea, and traditional medicine in southwestern Asia. The same plant
253
materials used for qRT-PCR were used for the HPLC analysis of rutin, botulin, and
254
betulinic acid accumulation (Figure 4). Rutin content in various species have been
255
shown to differ depending on environmental factors and growth stages28, 36. Our
256
results indicated that larger amounts of rutin (6–7-fold higher) were detected in leaves
257
than that in fruits, and that rutin content decreased during fruit maturation (Figure 4).
258
Small quantities of rutin were detected in the stems. As mentioned above,
259
MaUGT78D1 was highly expressed in leaves (Figure 2); we speculate that
260
MaUGT78D1 may play an important regulatory role in the rutin biosynthetic
261
pathways, which would require further confirmation by transformation experiments.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 31
Page 13 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
262
UGT78D1, a flavonol-specific glycosyltransferase, has been shown to be responsible
263
for transferring rhamnose or glucose to the 3-OH position in vitro37.
264
The natural compound, betulinic acid, has been shown to have potent anticancer
265
activity in cancer cells, and thus, is a new and promising experimental anticancer
266
agent for the treatment of human cancers38. Large amounts of betulin were found in
267
the roots and leaves (Figure 5), whereas only a little was detected in the stems and
268
fruits (average of approximately 0.3 µg/mg DW). Leaves contained the highest levels
269
of betulinic acid, followed by the roots and stems; little or no betulinic acid was
270
detected in the fruit (Figure 5).
271
In conclusion, we conducted detailed investigations of the phenylpropanoid and
272
triterpenoid biosynthetic pathways in the mulberry plant. To our knowledge, this is the
273
first study on expression of triterpenoid biosynthetic pathway genes in mulberry. We
274
identified 18 phenylpropanoid and 21 triterpenoid biosynthetic genes with different
275
isoforms showing varied levels of expression. In addition, we found abundant rutin in
276
mulberry leaves, and abundant betulin and betulinic acid in the roots and leaves.
277
Because of the significant medicinal functions of these compounds, we believe that
278
our results will provide the basic data for research on the significant health benefits
279
and medicinal potential of mulberry roots and leaves. Furthermore, the molecular
280
characterization of genes involved in the phenylpropanoid and triterpene biosynthesis
281
broadens our understanding of the molecular mechanisms in these biosynthesis
282
pathways in Morus alba.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
283
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
284
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National
285
Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education
286
(NRF-2014R1A1A4A01008939)
287
288
Notes
289
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
290
291
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
292
Supplementary file Table S1: Primers used for qRT-PCR. This material is available
293
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
294
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 31
Page 15 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
295
REFERENCES
296
1.
Vogt, T., Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Mol Plant 2010, 3, 2-20.
297
2.
Vijayalakshmi, A.; Kumar, P. R.; Priyadarsini, S. S.; Meenaxshi, C., In Vitro Antioxidant and
298
Anticancer Activity of Flavonoid Fraction from the Aerial Parts of Cissus quadrangularis Linn. against
299
Human Breast Carcinoma Cell Lines. J Chem-Ny 2013.
300
3.
301
Flavonoid Biosynthesis Genes and Accumulation of Phenolic Compounds in Common Buckwheat
302
(Fagopyrum esculentum). J Agr Food Chem 2010, 58, 12176-12181.
303
4.
304
of the antinociceptive action of the ethanolic extract and the triterpene 24-hydroxytormentic acid
305
isolated from the stem bark of Ocotea suaveolens. Planta Med 1999, 65, 50-5.
306
5.
307
natural medicines. IV. Aldose reductase and qlpha-glucosidase inhibitors from the roots of Salacia
308
oblonga Wall. (Celastraceae): structure of a new friedelane-type triterpene, kotalagenin 16-acetate.
309
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1999, 47, 1725-9.
310
6.
311
constituents from Cynomorium songaricum and related triterpene derivatives on HIV-1 protease. Chem
312
Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1999, 47, 141-5.
313
7.
314
ganoderma lucidum. Phytother Res 1999, 13, 529-31.
315
8.
316
M., Study of the betulin enriched birch bark extracts effects on human carcinoma cells and ear
Li, X. H.; Il Park, N.; Xu, H.; Woo, S. H.; Park, C. H.; Park, S. U., Differential Expression of
Beirith, A.; Santos, A. R.; Calixto, J. B.; Hess, S. C.; Messana, I.; Ferrari, F.; Yunes, R. A., Study
Matsuda, H.; Murakami, T.; Yashiro, K.; Yamahara, J.; Yoshikawa, M., Antidiabetic principles of
Ma, C.; Nakamura, N.; Miyashiro, H.; Hattori, M.; Shimotohno, K., Inhibitory effects of
Zhu, M.; Chang, Q.; Wong, L. K.; Chong, F. S.; Li, R. C., Triterpene antioxidants from
Dehelean, C. A.; Soica, C.; Ledeti, I.; Aluas, M.; Zupko, I.; A, G. L.; Cinta-Pinzaru, S.; Munteanu,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
317
inflammation. Chemistry Central journal 2012, 6, 137.
318
9.
319
Betulin complex in gamma-cyclodextrin derivatives: properties and antineoplasic activities in in vitro
320
and in vivo tumor models. Int J Mol Sci 2012, 13, 14992-5011.
321
10. Wick, W.; Grimmel, C.; Wagenknecht, B.; Dichgans, J.; Weller, M., Betulinic acid-induced
322
apoptosis in glioma cells: A sequential requirement for new protein synthesis, formation of reactive
323
oxygen species, and caspase processing. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics
324
1999, 289, 1306-12.
325
11. Liu, J. D., Study of the etiology of low-fever among female silk-weaving workers: extrinsic
326
allergic alveolitis due to mulberry silk dust exposure. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal
327
of preventive medicine] 1985, 19, 354-7.
328
12. Kim, H.; Yoon, Y. J.; Shon, J. H.; Cha, I. J.; Shin, J. G.; Liu, K. H., Potent inhibition of human
329
liver CYP3A activity by mulberry juice. Drug Metab Rev 2006, 38, 50-50.
330
13. Hemmati, A. A.; Jalai, M. T.; Rashidi, I.; Hormozi, T. K., Effects of aqueous extract of black
331
mulberry (Morus nigra) on liver and kidney of diabetic mice. Toxicol Lett 2008, 180, S48-S49.
332
14. Heo, S. I.; Jin, Y. S.; Jung, M. J.; Wang, M. H., Antidiabetic properties of 2,5-dihydroxy-4,3
333
'-di(beta-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-trans-stilbene from mulberry (Morus bombycis Koidzumi) root in
334
streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Med Food 2007, 10, 602-607.
335
15. Wang, Y. H.; Xiang, L. M.; Wang, C. H.; Tang, C.; He, X. J., Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Effects
336
and Phytochemicals of Mulberry Fruit (Morus alba L.) Polyphenol Enhanced Extract. PloS one 2013,
337
8.
338
16. Jiang, D. Q.; Guo, Y.; Xu, D. H.; Huang, Y. S.; Yuan, K.; Lv, Z. Q., Antioxidant and anti-fatigue
Soica, C.; Dehelean, C.; Danciu, C.; Wang, H. M.; Wenz, G.; Ambrus, R.; Bojin, F.; Anghel, M.,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 31
Page 17 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
339
effects of anthocyanins of mulberry juice purification (MJP) and mulberry marc purification (MMP)
340
from different varieties mulberry fruit in China. Food Chem Toxicol 2013, 59, 1-7.
341
17. Naowaratwattana, W.; De-Eknamkul, W.; De Mejia, E. G., Phenolic-containing organic extracts of
342
mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves inhibit HepG2 hepatoma cells through G2/M phase arrest, induction
343
of apoptosis, and inhibition of topoisomerase IIalpha activity. J Med Food 2010, 13, 1045-56.
344
18. Radojkovic, M. M.; Zekovic, Z. P.; Vidovic, S. S.; Kocar, D. D.; Maskovic, P. Z., Free radical
345
scavenging activity and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of mulberry (Morus spp. L., Moraceae)
346
extracts. Hem Ind 2012, 66, 545-550.
347
19. Jia, D. D.; Li, S. F.; Gu, Z. P., Preparative Isolation of Flavonoids from Mulberry (Morus Alba L.)
348
Leaves by Macroporous Resin Adsorption. J Food Process Eng 2011, 34, 1319-1337.
349
20. Kumar, R. V.; Babu, G. S.; Chauhan, S.; Srivastava, A.; Rao, Y.; Kumar, D., Total phenolics and
350
flavonoids content in ripened and unripened fruits of different mulberry (Morus alba) varieties. Indian
351
J Agr Sci 2012, 82, 277-279.
352
21. Lee, Y.; Lee, D. E.; Lee, H. S.; Kim, S. K.; Lee, W.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, M. W., Influence of auxins,
353
cytokinins, and nitrogen on production of rutin from callus and adventitious roots of the white
354
mulberry tree (Morus alba L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org 2011, 105, 9-19.
355
22. Lotito, S. B.; Frei, B., Consumption of flavonoid-rich foods and increased plasma antioxidant
356
capacity in humans: cause, consequence, or epiphenomenon? Free radical biology & medicine 2006,
357
41, 1727-46.
358
23. Guardia, T.; Rotelli, A. E.; Juarez, A. O.; Pelzer, L. E., Anti-inflammatory properties of plant
359
flavonoids. Effects of rutin, quercetin and hesperidin on adjuvant arthritis in rat. Farmaco 2001, 56,
360
683-7.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
361
24. Lin, J.-Y.; Tang, C.-Y., Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in selected fruits
362
and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte proliferation. Food Chem 2007,
363
101, 140-147.
364
25. Yan, J. W.; Wang, M.; Lu, J. D., Determination of rutin, quercetin, and chlorogenic acid in
365
mulberry leaves by capillary zone electrophoresis. Anal Lett 2004, 37, 3287-3297.
366
26. Li, J. R.; Han, X. X., Ultrahigh-pressure extraction for mulberry leaf rutin. Chinese J Anal Chem
367
2008, 36, 365-368.
368
27. He, N.; Zhang, C.; Qi, X.; Zhao, S.; Tao, Y.; Yang, G.; Lee, T. H.; Wang, X.; Cai, Q.; Li, D.; Lu,
369
M.; Liao, S.; Luo, G.; He, R.; Tan, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, A.; Jia, L.; Fu, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Gao, C.; Ma,
370
B.; Liang, J.; Wang, X.; Shang, J.; Song, P.; Wu, H.; Fan, L.; Wang, Q.; Shuai, Q.; Zhu, J.; Wei, C.;
371
Zhu-Salzman, K.; Jin, D.; Wang, J.; Liu, T.; Yu, M.; Tang, C.; Wang, Z.; Dai, F.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao,
372
S.; Lin, T.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Yang, G.; Wang, J.; Paterson, A. H.; Xia, Q.; Ji, D.;
373
Xiang, Z., Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nat Commun 2013, 4, 2445.
374
28. Li, X.; Kim, J. K.; Park, S. Y.; Zhao, S.; Kim, Y. B.; Lee, S.; Park, S. U., Comparative analysis of
375
flavonoids and polar metabolite profiling of tanno-original and tanno-high rutin buckwheat. J Agric
376
Food Chem 2014, 62, 2701-8.
377
29. Tuan, P. A.; Park, N. I.; Li, X.; Xu, H.; Kim, H. M.; Park, S. U., Molecular Cloning and
378
Characterization of Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase and Cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase in the
379
Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis Pathway in Garlic (Allium sativum). J Agr Food Chem 2010, 58,
380
10911-10917.
381
30. Tuan, P. A.; Park, W. T.; Xu, H.; Park, N. I.; Park, S. U., Accumulation of Tilianin and Rosmarinic
382
Acid and Expression of Phenylpropanoid Biosynthetic Genes in Agastache rugosa. J Agr Food Chem
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 31
Page 19 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
383
2012, 60, 5945-5951.
384
31. Zhao, S.; Li, X.; Cho, D. H.; Arasu, M. V.; Al-Dhabi, N. A.; Park, S. U., Accumulation of
385
kaempferitrin and expression of phenyl-propanoid biosynthetic genes in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus).
386
Molecules 2014, 19, 16987-97.
387
32. Zhao, S.; Tuan, P. A.; Li, X.; Kim, Y. B.; Kim, H.; Park, C. G.; Yang, J.; Li, C. H.; Park, S. U.,
388
Identification of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes and phenylpropanoid accumulation by
389
transcriptome analysis of Lycium chinense. Bmc Genomics 2013, 14, 802.
390
33. Xu, H.; Park, N. I.; Li, X.; Kim, Y. K.; Lee, S. Y.; Park, S. U., Molecular cloning and
391
characterization of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase and genes involved in
392
flavone biosynthesis in Scutellaria baicalensis. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101, 9715-22.
393
34. Richet, N.; Tozo, K.; Afif, D.; Banvoy, J.; Legay, S.; Dizengremel, P.; Cabane, M., The response
394
to daylight or continuous ozone of phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthesis pathways in poplar differs
395
between leaves and wood. Planta 2012, 236, 727-737.
396
35. Huang, L.; Li, J.; Ye, H.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y., Molecular characterization of the
397
pentacyclic triterpenoid biosynthetic pathway in Catharanthus roseus. Planta 2012, 236, 1571-81.
398
36. Kim, H. J.; Park, K. J.; Lim, J. H., Metabolomic analysis of phenolic compounds in buckwheat
399
(Fagopyrum esculentum M.) sprouts treated with methyl jasmonate. J Agric Food Chem 2011, 59,
400
5707-13.
401
37. Ren, G.; Hou, J.; Fang, Q.; Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, P. G., Synthesis of flavonol
402
3-O-glycoside by UGT78D1. Glycoconjugate journal 2012, 29, 425-32.
403
38. Fulda, S., Betulinic Acid for cancer treatment and prevention. Int J Mol Sci 2008, 9, 1096-107.
404
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 31
405 406
FIGURE LEGENDS
407
Figure 1. Schematic of rutin biosynthesis (a) and betulin and betulinic acid
408
biosynthesis (b). PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamic acid
409
4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI,
410
chalcone isomerase; F3H, flavone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase;
411
F3GT,
412
L-rhamnosyltransferase;
413
hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA
414
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase; MVK, mevalonate kinase; PMK,
415
phosphomevalonate kinase; MVD, diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase; DXS,
416
1-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate
417
reductoisomerase; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase;
418
CMK,
419
2-C-methyl-D-erythritol
420
4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl
421
4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase; IDI, Isopentenyl-diphosphate
422
delta-isomerase; GPPS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate
423
synthase; SQS, squalene synthetase; SQE, squalene epoxidase; LUS, lupeol synthase.
424
Figure 2. Expression levels of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes in different organs
425
of mulberry (Morus alba L.) calculated by relative quantification with the mulberry
426
actin housekeeping gene. Each value is the mean of three replicates, and error bars
427
indicate standard deviation.
428
Figure 3. Expression levels of triterpene biosynthetic genes in different organs of
429
mulberry (Morus alba L.) calculated by relative quantification with the mulberry actin
430
housekeeping gene. Each value is the mean of three replicates, and error bars indicate
431
standard deviations.
flavonol
3-O-glucosyltransferase; AACT,
UGT78D1,
acetyl-CoA
flavonol-3-O-glucoside
acetyltransferase;
synthase;
synthase;
DXR,
HMGR,
1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate
4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-
HMGS,
cyclodiphosphate diphosphate
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
kinase;
MCS,
synthase;
HDS,
synthase;
IDS,
Page 21 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
432
Figure 4. Accumulation of rutin in different organs of mulberry (Morus alba L.).
433
Each value is the mean of three replicates, and error bars indicate standard deviation.
434
Figure 5. Accumulation of betulin and betulinic acid in different organs of mulberry
435
(Morus alba L.). Each value is the mean of three replicates, and error bars indicate
436
standard deviation.
437
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 31
Table 1. Comparison of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes of Morus alba L. with the most orthologous genes L. chinense
Length
(Accession no.)
(amino acids)
MaPAL1
722
MaPAL2
749
MaPAL3
344
MaC4H1
525
MaC4H2
507
Ma4CL2
Ma4CL7-1
Ma4CL7-2
Ma4CL9
MaCHS1
MaCHS2
MaCHS3
365
547
539
471
257
259
399
Orthologous genes (Accession no.) Morus notabilis PAL (XM_010113926)
Identity (%) 97
Ricinus communis PAL (XM_002531631)
84
Nelumbo nucifera PAL (XM_010264565)
84
Morus notabilis PAL(XM_010109218)
97
Boehmeria nivea PAL (KP100114) Jatropha curcas PAL (XM_012226984)
87 86
Morus notabilis PAL (XM_010091807) Jatropha curcas PAL (XM_012221611)
99 78
Nelumbo nucifera PAL (XM_010263680) Morus notabilis C4H (XM_010108644)
78 98
Lonicera japonica C4H (JX068605) Theobroma cacao C4H (XM_007014477)
81 84
Morus notabilis C4H (XM_004249173) Jatropha curcas C4H (XM_012222786)
99 92
Rubus occidentalis C4H (FJ554629) Morus notabilis 4CL2 (XM_010089179)
91 99
Vitis vinifera 4CL (JN858959) Prunus persica 4CL (XM_007219446)
85 84
Morus notabilis 4CL7 (XM_010103319) Prunus mume 4CL7 (XM_008243188)
97 73
Cucumis melo 4CL7 (XM_008444488) Morus notabilis 4CL7 (XM_010113516)
67 97
Malus domestica 4CL7 (XM_008386493) Betula pendula 4CL (KM099197)
81 80
Morus notabilis 4Cl9 (XM_010106939) Prunus mume 4CL9 (XM_008241147)
81 70
Malus domestica 4CL9 (XM_008394619) Morus notabilis CHS (XM_010100833)
68 99
Vaccinium ashei CHS (AB694902) Hypericum perforatum CHS (AF461105)
93 93
Citrus sinensis CHS2 (XP_006468926) Clausena lansium CHS (KP064028)
86 86
Elaeis guineensis CHS2 (XM_010931189) Citrus limon CHS (KP720587)
87 66
Populus alba CHS (DQ371803) Cochlearia danica CHS (AF144532)
65 64 98 84 84 95
MaCHS9
218
Morus notabilis CHS9 (XM_010090374) Ricinus communis CHS (XM_002529211)
MaCHI1
228
Vitis vinifera CHS (XM_002276617) Morus notabilis CHI (XM_010103211)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
MaCHI2
308
MaCHI3
208
MaF3H
228
MaF3’H1
354
MaF3’H2
177
MaF3GT
339
MaUGT78D1
447
Prunus cerasifera CHI (KP772274) Camellia nitidissima CHI (HQ269805)
57 57
Morus notabilis CHI (KF438043) Prunus avium CHI1 (GU990525)
98 80
Populus trichocarpa CHI (XM_002315222) Morus notabilis CHI (XM_010105346)
77 98
Actinidia chrysantha CHI (KM453235) Gossypium hirsutum CHI (GU295063)
77 77
Morus notabilis F3H1 (KF438044) Dimocarpus longan F3H (EF468104)
99 92
Vitis vinifera F3H (XM_002275527) Morus notabilis F3H (XM_010107524)
91 97
Prunus avium F3’H1 (GU990527) Vitis vinifera F3’H3 (AB213604)
74 73
Morus notabilis F3’H (XM_010107523) Prunus persica F3’H (KJ484546)
97 73
Vitis vinifera F3’H (AJ880357) Morus notabilis UGT85A1 (XM_010089319)
73 95
Theobroma cacao UGT85A2 (XM_007047847) Prunus mume UGT85A5 (XM_008235943)
78 72
Morus notabilis UGT85A2 (XM_010100315) Prunus mume UGT85A2 (XM_008221095)
99 74
Theobroma cacao UGT85A2 (XM_007042858)
73
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 31
Table 2. Comparison of triterpene biosynthetic genes of Morus alba L. with the most orthologous genes L. chinense
Length
Orthologous genes
Identity
(Accession no.)
(amino acids)
(Accession no.) Morus notabilis AACT1 (XM_010090057)
(%)
MaAACT1
403
MaAACT2
MaHMGS
MaHMGR1
MaHMGR2
MaMVK
MaPMK
416
464
548
586
356
507
MaMVD
421
MaIDI
295
MaDXS
714
MaDXR
363
MaMCT
243
MaCMK
254
98
Camellia oleifera AACT (GU594059)
92
Sesamum indicum AACT1 (XM_011102210) Morus notabilis AACT2 (XM_010093715)
91 99
Prunus mume AAC1 (XM_008226416) Cicer arietinum AACT2 (XM_004507531)
84 83
Morus notabilis HMGS (XM_010109749) Ricinus communis HMGS (XM_002509646)
98 88
Jatropha curcas HMGS (XM_012231634) Morus notabilis HMGR1 (XM_010096207)
88 97
Betula platyphylla HMGR (KJ452334) Hevea brasiliensis HMGR1 (P29057)
85 81
Morus notabilis HMGR2 (XM_010092425) Prunus mume HMGR1 (XM_008237609)
98 82
Cucumis melo HMGR1 (XM_008452963) Morus notabilis MVK (XM_010107540)
80 99
Prunus mume MVK (XM_008248266) Jatropha curcas MVK (XM_012233688)
83 82
Morus notabilis PMK (XM_010112088) Prunus mume PMK (XM_008239928)
91 84
Jatropha curcas PMK (XM_012236623) Morus notabilis MVD (XM_010090485)
82 95
Astragalus membranaceus MVD (KF355964) Glycine max MVD (XM_003555822)
86 87
Morus notabilis IDI2 (XM_010112783) Pueraria montana IDI (AY315650)
99 89
Glycine soja IDI2 (KN645832) Morus notabilis DXS (XM_010115150)
88 98
Prunus mume DXS2 (XM_008238129) Ricinus communis DXS (XM_002532338)
84 85
Morus notabilis DXR (XM_010102910) Populus trichocarpa DXR (EU693020)
99 92
Hevea brasiliensis DXR (AB294701) Morus notabilis MCT (XM_010090393)
91 87
Populus trichocarpa MCT (EU693021) Prunus mume MCT (XM_008220406)
82 71
Morus notabilis CMK (XM_010095512) Prunus mume CMK (XM_008229149)
99 81
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
MaMCS
248
MaHDS
740
MaIDS
461
MaGPPS
380
MaFPPS
182
MaSQS
408
MaSES
MaLUS
524
754
Cicer arietinum CMK (XM_004499380) Morus notabilis MCS (XM_010114326)
78 96
Fragaria vesca MCS (XM_004298785) Prunus mume MCS (XM_008240732)
88 74
Morus notabilis HDS (XM_010099896) Vitis vinifera HDS (XM_002285094)
99 90
Theobroma cacao HDS1 (XM_007016661) Morus notabilis IDS (XM_010097923)
91 97
Prunus mume IDS (XM_008238530) Hevea brasiliensis IDS (AB294708)
85 85
Morus notabilis GPPS (XM_010096985) Corylus avellana GPPS (EF553534)
95 77
Elaeagnus umbellata GPPS (FJ827762) Morus notabilis FPPS1 (XM_010105650)
78 99
Cucumis sativus FPPS1 (XM_004149361) Nelumbo nucifera FPPS1 (XM_010246724)
89 88
Morus notabilis L484 (XM_010111466) Cicer arietinum SQS (XM_004507443)
98 85
Diospyros kaki SQS (FJ687954) Theobroma cacao SQE1 (XM_007018355)
85 86
Cucumis melo SQE (XM_008454464) Jatropha curcas SQE (XM_012212770)
86 83
Eucalyptus grandis LUS (XM_010050218) Morus notabilis LUS (XM_010096904)
74 72
Theobroma cacao LUS1 (XM_007014650)
73
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 31
Page 27 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 31
Page 29 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Rutin 7 5.96 6
(mg/g)
5 4 3 2 1
1.09
1.07
Fruits-1
Fruits-2
0.80
0.43 0.01
0 Roots
Stems
Leaves
Figure 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Fruits-3
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Betulin 2.5
(mg/g)
2
1.88 1.67
1.5 1 0.31
0.5
0.34
0.32
0.35
Fruits-1
Fruits-2
Fruits-3
0 Roots
Stems
Leaves
(mg/g)
Betulinic acid 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
0.70
0.40 0.24 0.10
0.10 0
Roots
Stems
Leaves
Fruits-1
Fruits-2
Figure 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Fruits-3
Page 30 of 31
Page 31 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table of Contents Graphics
ACS Paragon Plus Environment