Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of monoalkyl xanthates - The Journal of

J. Org. Chem. , 1974, 39 (8), pp 1130–1134. DOI: 10.1021/jo00922a025. Publication Date: April 1974. ACS Legacy Archive. Cite this:J. Org. Chem. 1974...
0 downloads 0 Views 598KB Size
1130

J. Org. Chem., Vol.39, No. 8, 1974

Bunton, Ng, and Sepulveda

mechanism for the acetylene. This change in mechanism may arise from the somewhat greater reactivity of olefins than acetylenes via the AdE2 mechanism, possibly combined with a lower sensitivity to steric effects for Ad3 addition to acetylenes relative to olefins. For both olefins and acetylenes the balance between AdE2 and Ad3 addition appears to be delicate, so that changes in reactant structure or reaction conditions can lead to a shift from one mechanism to the other as the predominant pathway for reaction. Acknowledgments. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GP 24562. We thank Mr. Raymond Carrillo for technical assistance with some of the experiments, and Professor Paul E. Peterson for helpful comments. Registry No.-3, 10124-73-9; 5, 42131-99-7; 7, 42132-01-4; 2,2dichlorohexane, 42131-89-5; 1-hexyne-1-d, 7299-48-1; 2-hexyne, 764-35-2; (E)-3-chloro-2-hexene, 4050-45-7; 1-phenylpropyne, 67332-5.

References a n d Notes C. Fahey and D.-J. Lee, J. Amer. Chem. SOC.,88,5555 (1966). (2) R. C. Fahey and D.-J. Lee, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 90,2124 (1968). (3) 91,3865 . , R. C. Fahey and C. A. McPherson, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., (1) R.

(1969). (4) R. C. Fahey, M . W. Monahan, and C. A. McPherson. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 92,2810 (1970). (5) R. C. Fahey and M . W. Monahan, J. Amer. Chem. SOC.. 92, 2816 119701.

(6) R.-C-Fahey and C. A. McPherson, J . Amer. Chem. SOC.,93, 2445 (1971). (7) R. C. Fahey and C. Schubert, J. Amer. Chem. SOC.,87, 5172 (1965). (8) C. DuFraisse and J. E. Viel, Bull. SOC.Chim. Fr., 37,877 (1925). (9) E. B. Whipple, J. H . Goldstein, and L. Mandell, J. Amer. Chem. SOC.,82,3010 (1960). (IO) P. E. Peterson, R . J. Bopp, and M . Ajo, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 92, 2834 (1970);R. J. Bopp, Ph.D. Thesis, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Mo., 1967. (11) S. W. Tobey, J. Org. Chem., 34,1281 (1969). (12) K. Griesbaum and Z. Rehman, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 92, 1417 (1970). (13) D. S. Noyce, M . A. Matesich, M . D. Schiavelli, and P. E. Peterson, J. Amer. Chem. SOC., 87, 2295 (1965);D. S.Noyceand M . D . Schiavelli, J. Org. Chem., 33,845 (1968). (14) P. E. Peterson, C. Casey, E. V. P. Tao, A. Agtarap, and G . Thompson,J. Amer. Chem. SOC.,87,5163 (1965).

Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Monoalkyl Xanthates1 Clifford A. Bunton,* Patricia Ng, and Luis Sepulveda Department of Chemist y, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, and Faculty of Chemical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Received October 5, 1973 The decomposition of n-butyl xanthate in water, pH 2 the firstorder rate constant was proportional to the concentration of ethylxanthic acid. It has been suggested that an ionpair complex of a proton and an alkyl xanthate ion is the reactive species,6 but such an ion pair seems to be an improbable reactive intermediate and alternative formulations of a unimolecular mechanism are S

or

H

I Similar spontaneous unimolecular eliminations have been observed in decarboxylations7 and hydrolysis of phosphate ester monoanions.8 However, the evidence does not exclude the h C 2mechanism of ether hydroly~is.~

The rate of hydrolysis of ethylxanthic acid reaches a maximum at ca. 0.5 M HCl and then decreases. This behavior was treated in terms of formation of a xanthic acid-hydronium ion association,5 but Iwasaki and Cooke detected a new species spectrophotometrically when the acid concentration was >0.5 M , and they suggested that this was the unreactive protonated xanthic a ~ i d . ~Howb ever, similar rate maxima are very common in the acid hydrolysis of weakly basic substrates such as amides, and are explained, at least partially, in terms of decreasing water activity at acidities where the substrate is fully protonated.lO Rate maxima are also observed in A2 hydrolyses of some weakly basic substrates, such as aryl phosphate@ and phosphonates.11 However, these reactions involve nucleophilic attack by water. In the hope of throwing more light on this problem, we used n-butyl and tertbutyl xanthate, because the ease of formation of the tertbutyl cation might introduce a new mechanism of hydrolysis,l2 with a change in the dependence of rate upon acidity. A few experiments were also made with ethyl xanthate. Experimental Section Materials. The potassium alkyl xanthates were prepared in the usual way by the reaction of CS2 with the alkoxide ion in the alcohol or CS2 as solvent.13 They were purified by precipitation from the alcohol or acetone by addition of Et20 followed by recrystallization.

J.Org. Chem., Vol.39, No. 8, 1974 1131

Hydrolysis of Monoalkyl Xanthates Table I Decomposition of n-Butyl Xanthate i n Aqueous Acids. h,b, sec-1-

---lo2

[HCII, M

[HC104], M

0,001

0.002 0.005 0.01

0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.00

1.25

1.25

1.5

1.5

2.0 2.25

2.25

2.5 2.5 3.0 3.05 4.0

Obsd

CalcdC

0.37 0.75 1.66 2.79 4.38 6.92 9.02 10.6 9.90 9,456 9 .O l b 9.05 8. 70b 7. 71b 8 . 84b 7,336 8 ,42b 6.13b 7.28 6.72b 4 , 91b 6. 48b 4.39b 6.O l b 3.636 3.93

0.38 0.74 1.67 2.90 4.59 7.02

8.60 9.66 9.58 9.58 8.95 8.63 8.63 8.10 8.52 7.65 8.33 7.10 7.55 7.05 5.10 6.55 4.35 5.55 3.01 3.55

a A t 25.0 O. b Stopped-flow measurements. 0 Calculated using k = 0.11 sec-1 and K , = 2.9 X 10-2;a n d K,' = 1 4 in HC1 and 9 in HCIOc

Table I1 Reaction of n-Butyl Xanthate in Acidic Methanola 108 LEI+], M

0.82 0.96 4.8

9.6 19.0

10%h&, sec -1

Results and Discussion Variation of Rate Constant with pH. Our results with ethyl xanthate agree with earlier ~ o r k , ~ and , 5 n-butyl xanthate behaves very similarly; and the rate-acidity profile fits the following scheme. k ROCS,H+ =+= ROCS,H products

+

-

K,

Neglecting activity effects we obtain eq 1, which fits the data up to 0.5 M hydrochloric acid (Figure 1and Table I). The values for up to 0.5 M HC1 (Table I) were calculat(measured ed using k = 0.11 sec-1, and K , = 2.9 x spectrophotometricallyj .I5 The relation between rate and pH is essentially the same for buffers and dilute HC1 (Figure l j , with no evidence for general acid catalysis. For methanesulfonic acid in methanol in the concentration range 1-20 x 10-3 M the first-order rate