ACS Nano - ACS Publications - American Chemical Society

May 29, 2015 - The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01324. pdf. nn5b01324_...
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV

Article

Positron Emission Tomography based Elucidation of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Dogs with Cancer using Copper-64 Liposomes Anders E. Hansen, Anncatrine L Petersen, Jonas R. Henriksen, Betina Boerresen, Palle Rasmussen, Dennis R. Elema, Per M. Rosenschoeld, Annemarie T. Kristensen, Andreas Kjær, and Thomas L. Andresen ACS Nano, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01324 • Publication Date (Web): 29 May 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 31, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Nano is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Positron Emission Tomography based Elucidation of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Dogs with Cancer using Copper-64 Liposomes Anders E. Hansen1,2, Anncatrine L. Petersen1, Jonas R. Henriksen1,3, Betina Boerresen,4 Palle Rasmussen1,5, Dennis R. Elema 1,5, Per Munch af Rosenschöld6, Annemarie T. Kristensen4, Andreas Kjær2, Thomas L. Andresen1.* 1

Center for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, DTU Nanotech, Technical University of Denmark,

Building 423, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; 3DTU Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Building 206, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark; 4Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 16, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark; 5DTU Nutech, Hevesy Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark; 6Radiation Medicine Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;

E-mail: [email protected]

RECEIVED DATE (to be automatically inserted after your manuscript is accepted if required according to the journal that you are submitting your paper to)

*Corresponding author contact details, Phone: +45 45258168, Fax: 4588 7762, E-mail: [email protected]

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ABSTRACT. Since the first report of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, the research in nanocarrier based anti-tumor drugs has been intense. The field has been devoted to treatment of cancer by exploiting EPR-based accumulation of nanocarriers in solid tumors, which for many years was considered to be a ubiquitous phenomenon. However, the understanding of differences in the EPR-effect between tumor types, heterogeneities within each patient group, and dependency on tumor development stage in humans is sparse. It is therefore important to enhance our understanding of the EPR-effect in large animals and humans with spontaneously developed cancer. In the present paper, we describe a novel loading method of copper-64 into PEGylated liposomes and use these liposomes to evaluate the EPR-effect in 11 canine cancer patients with spontaneous solid tumors by PET/CT imaging. We thereby provide the first high-resolution analysis of EPR-based tumor accumulation in large animals. We find that the EPR-effect is strong in some tumor types but cannot be considered a general feature of solid malignant tumors since we observed a high degree of accumulation heterogeneity between tumors. Six of seven included carcinomas displayed high uptake levels of liposomes, whereas one of four sarcomas displayed signs of liposome retention. We conclude that nanocarrier-radiotracers could be important in identifying cancer patients that will benefit from nanocarrier-based therapeutics in clinical practice.

KEYWORDS. Nanomedicine, cancer, EPR-effect, drug delivery, imaging, nanoparticles, liposomes

The therapeutic potential of nanocarrier based chemotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer is considered huge and considerable success has been achieved since its introduction.1,2 Many of the developed nanocarrier systems are considered to accumulate in tumors based on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR)-effect,3 which in nanomedicine research has been considered a universal feature of solid malignant tumors that can serve as the basis for passive tumor targeting of therapeutic and diagnostic nanoparticles.4-6 Solid tumors growing beyond a size of a few millimeters depend on successful formation of neoangiogenic blood vessels to meet their oxygen and energy requirements, and for removal of waste products.7,8 The blood vessels of malignant tumors display several anatomical and pathophysiological differences relative to the vessels in normal tissues. Tumors display a poorly organized vascular architecture, which have been reported to include wide endothelial fenestrations and absent lymphatic drainage.5,9,10 These features form the basis for the EPR-based extravasation

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 25

Page 3 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

of nano-sized particles into tumor tissue.5,9 The heterogeneous tumor microenvironment contains well-characterized loco-regional features that may affect the accumulation of nanoparticles in tumors, including poorly perfused regions of hypoxia11 and regional activity of vasoactive proteins.12,13 Massive efforts are currently directed towards the development of nanocarriers that can deliver drugs to cellular and subcellular targets in tumors. It has been argued that the therapeutic benefit of marketed nanotherapeutics for cancer relates to reduced toxicity, e.g. reduced cardiovascular toxicity of Doxil relative to doxorubicin rather than an improved therapeutic effect.14 To provide new evidence of the therapeutic potential of nanocarrier systems for treating cancer, an important question to address is related to the EPR-effect. Current knowledge on the ability of nanocarriers to deliver chemotherapeutics to solid tumors mainly originates from quantitative estimation of tumor targeting in experimental models, primarily xenografts in mice, and the actual data in cancer patients is scarce. It is remarkable that despite the theoretical potential and obtained results, only limited efforts have been made to investigate tumor targeting of nanoparticle formulations in spontaneous tumors in large animals. Current knowledge on the EPR-effect in human tumors is based on studies of low-resolution single photon imaging techniques of radiolabeled liposomes.15-18 Liposome uptake has been investigated in a Kaposi sarcoma and a lymphoma patient.16 Furthermore, targeting and delineation has been investigated in eight high-grade gliomas17 and positive tumor identification using radiolabeled phospholipid vesicles in 22 of 24 patients suffering from a few malignancies.18 Gamma camera and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of

111

In-DTPA-labeled pegylated liposomes was also performed in 17 patients

suffering from head and neck, breast, bronchus and cervix cancer and two glioma patients, with 12 tumors being identified by gamma camera imaging and 15 tumors identified by SPECT.15 However, all these studies only provide the conclusion that tumors were visible due to presence of radiolabeled liposomes in the tumor and did not report direct quantitative evidence of the EPReffect, as we will show and discuss in the present study. Thus, there is a strong need for studies in large animals with spontaneous syngeneic tumors, with a microenvironment and vasculature that is comparable to human tumors, as this will elucidate the tumor targeting potential of nanocarriers and thereby guide future development of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. In this study, we report a new and highly efficient method for labeling PEGylated liposomes with copper-64 and utilize positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to evaluate liposome tumor accumulation including heterogeneity and pharmacokinetics in family

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

owned dogs with spontaneous solid tumors. The new loading method is based on an un-assisted transport of copper-64 into liposomes, which is surprisingly efficient as diffusion of divalent cations such as Cu2+ across lipid bilayers is highly un-expected. We utilize the developed copper-64 liposome imaging agents for studying the EPR-effect in dogs with cancer as the biological features of cancer in dogs is similar to humans and their size and heterogeneous microenvironment make them attractive models for comparative research.19 PEGylated liposomes with the same lipid composition as the clinically used Doxil formulation, radiolabeled with copper-64 ([Cu-64]liposomes), were utilized in the study. PET/CT imaging allows for the acquisition of dynamic imaging data and determination of direct quantitative uptake data within specific regions of interest (ROI).20,21 The high detection sensitivity and spatial resolution of PET compared to SPECT and sensitivity compared to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging makes PET superior for quantitative studies of nanoparticle biodistribution.20,22,23 In addition, PET is a true quantitative technique.

Results Preparation of liposome imaging probes by un-assisted loading of Copper-64. In the present work, DSPC:CHOL:DSPE-PEG2000 (56.5:38.2:5.3) liposomes were prepared with the high affinity copper chelator DOTA encapsulated. These liposomes were used for loading of [Cu-64]2+ by a new un-assisted loading method without the use of ionophores or ion transporters,24 as schematically illustrated in Figure 1a. In this method, copper-64 chloride is added to liposome solutions and postloading purification is not needed due to very high loading efficiencies, which is important for PET imaging due to the short half-life of PET isotopes (e.g. copper-64 has a 12.7 h half-life). Unassisted loading of [Cu-64]2+ into the liposomes was possible by increasing the temperature during loading to 55 °C, which was surprising as divalent cations are not generally expected to cross lipid bilayers.24 The [Cu-64]2+ was trapped inside the liposome by the encapsulated DOTA. Liposome loading kinetics of [Cu-64]2+ was evaluated using radio-TLC (Figure 1b) and size exclusion chromatography. Full loading was observed at 55 °C within 60 min after addition of 64-copper chloride, where >98% of the copper was loaded in 10 independent experiments. The [Cu-64]2+ loading was surprisingly fast where 38% ± 3% was loaded within the first minute after addition. The [Cu-64]-liposomes was used without further purification in the dog study, which was possible due to the very high loading efficiency.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 25

Page 5 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of Loading of [Cu-64]2+ into liposomes. After addition of [Cu64]2+ to a liposome solution, [Cu-64]2+ diffuse across the lipid bilayer without the use of ionophores or ion-transporters. [Cu-64]2+ then forms a complex with the encapsulated chelator (DOTA) and is hereby trapped inside the liposome. (b) Loading efficiency of liposomes given as function of time. The loading efficiency, for loading of [Cu-64]2+ into liposomes, was evaluated at 55 °C by the use of radio-TLC at 1, 3, 8, 15, 30 and 60 min. The liposomes were composed of HSPC:CHOL:DSPEPEG2000 in the molar ratio (56.5:38.2:5.3). The error bars represent SEM (n = 3).

EPR based liposomal accumulation in spontaneous tumors in canine patients. Family owned dogs suffering from spontaneous malignancies were included in the study. All dogs had a histopathological diagnosis based on tumor formalin fixed paraffin embedded HE stained tumor biopsies or sections. [Cu-64]-liposomes with a composition of HSPC/Cholesterol/DSPE-PEG2000 56.5:38.2:5.3 were used (Doxil lipid composition), which allowed for high-resolution PET imaging of liposome biodistribution. Six of the included 11 dogs were also subjected to 2-[18F]fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging. FDG PET/CT has a central position for PET imaging of cancer patients and was performed for tumor delineation and staging purposes. The first [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT scan was recorded one day after the FDG PET/CT. Dogs had PET/CT scans performed on two consecutive days approximately 24 h apart, except for dog 11 where the 1-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT was not performed for technical reasons. The [Cu-64]liposomes were administered by intravenous infusion at increasing rates over a 20 min period. None of the included dogs displayed any anaphylactic, toxic or adverse reactions. Tumor characteristics and PET uptake of FDG and [Cu-64]-liposomes (standardized uptake value (SUV)) are reported in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 25

Table 1. [Cu-64]-liposome PET scans were performed dynamically during the initial 0-40 min over the liver and spleen, and hereafter 40-60 min over the tumor (termed 1-hour scan), and again after 24 h (termed 24-hour scan). The FDG scanned carcinomas displayed higher SUV of FDG relative to the sarcomas, which is in agreement with a previous report on FDG PET in dogs.25 All carcinomas displayed increased mean SUV (SUVmean) and particularly maximum SUV (SUVmax) of [Cu-64]-liposomes between the 1-hour and 24-hour PET scans, except dog 9 where SUVmean did not increase between scans. Oppositely, SUV did not increase for the sarcomas, except for a SUVmax increase in dog 4. Table 1. Dog and tumor characteristics, and tumor uptake as standardized uptake values (SUV) for 18FDG and [Cu-64]-liposomes 18

BW (kg)

Tumor type

Tumor volume (cm3)

Tumor location

Golden Retriever

39

SCC

4.0

8/F

Mixed breed

28

AC

3

5/F

Labrador Retriever

25

4

8/F

Beagle

5

5/M

6

Dog

Age/ Sex

Breed

1

11/M

2

FDG PET/CT

1-hour

24-hour

[64-Cu]-liposome PET/CT

[64-Cu]-liposome PET/CT

SUVmean

SUVmax

SUVmean

SUVmax

SUVmean

SUVmax

Intranasal

8.7

14.5

2.1

5.5

6.1

21.3

274.5

Mammary glands

4.8

17.6

0.7

3.2

1.3

11.2

AC

19.4

Submandibular

5.3

8.4

1.3

4.2

1.6

7.7

12

STS

32.6

Masticatory muscle

1.8

4.3

0.5

2.0

0.4

2.6

Münsterländer

25

STS

10.5

Neck muscle

2.0

4.7

0.6

2.3

0.4

1.4

6/F

Labrador Retriever

32

LS

4.8

Antebrachium

2.4

3.6

0.8

2.5

0.6

1.5

7

12/M

Labrador Retriever

33

TCC

22.0

Intranasal

-

-

1.4

3.7

2.6

18.7

8

7/F

Labrador Retriever

27

STS

10.1

Front paw

-

-

0.6

1.6

0.3

1.4

9

9/F

Dachshund

10

AC

7.1

Mammary glands

-

-

0.7

1.7

0.7

2.0

10

10/M

Schnauzer

13

SCC

8.0

Intranasal

-

-

1.3

4.7

2.9

6.9

11

12/M

Golden Retriever

32

AC

36.6

Intranasal

-

-

-

-

1.6

10.2

M: Male, F: Female, BW: Bodyweight, SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma, AC: Adenocarcinoma, STS: Soft tissue sarcoma, TCC: Transitional cell carcinoma, LS: Liposarcoma. Carcinomas in bold. Tumor volume determined by PET/CT-scan.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 2. FDG PET/CT and [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT. PET/CT image of the intranasal squamous cell carcinoma in the right nasal cavity of dog 1 (a-c), illustrating tumor accumulation of FDG (a), [Cu-64]liposome PET/CT 1 h after liposome infusion (b), [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT 24 h after liposome infusion (c). The heterogeneous tumor uptake of the liposomes (24-hour PET/CT) can be visually appreciated on the 24-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT image of the adenocarcinoma of dog 3 (d). 24-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT images of the soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in the mandibular region of dog 4 (e) and the neck musculature of dog 5 (f) illustrates the low accumulation in these tumors relative the carcinomas (c,d). Tumors are marked by arrows or delineated by white lines and larger blood vessels by red circles (c-d).

Accumulation levels of [Cu-64]-liposomes were determined by calculating decay corrected percentage of injected dose (%ID) of [Cu-64]-liposomes in tumors (Table 2). The included carcinomas displayed increased total tumor, mean and maximum %ID of [Cu-64]-liposomes between the 1-hour and 24-hour PET scans, except dog 9 where a slightly decreased mean and total %ID/g was observed. The included sarcomas displayed decreased %ID values, except for a slightly increased maximum %ID in dog 4. The tumor mean %ID/kg after a distribution period of only 1 h is expected to primarily consist of activity in tumor vasculature and ranged from 2.2 – 11.2 (mean 4.5, SEM 0.8) %ID/kg.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 25

Table 2. Tumor uptake levels of [Cu-64]-liposomes 1 and 24 hours after injection 1-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT

24-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT

Dog

Total %ID

Mean %ID/kg

Max %ID/kg

Total %ID

Mean %ID/kg

Max %ID/kg

1

0.02

4.6

16

0.07

17

59

2

0.61

2.5

11

1.29

4.8

40

3

0.11

5.2

17

0.13

6.5

31

4

0.14

3.8

15

0.11

3.5

21

5

0.03

2.5

7.7

0.02

1.5

5.7

6

0.01

2.3

7.9

0.01

1.8

4.7

7

0.10

4.2

11.2

0.18

8.1

57.1

8

0.03

2.2

6.1

0.01

1.1

5.3

9

0.09

7.4

17

0.05

6.7

20.0

10

0.10

11.2

35.8

0.19

23.1

54.1

11

-

-

-

0.20

5.4

32.0

Total %ID: Percentage of injected dose in total. Mean and max %ID/kg: Mean and maximum percentage of injected dose pr. kg of tumor tissue determined from liposome PET/CT scans performed 1 h and 24 h after injection. Carcinomas in bold.

Visual evaluation of the PET/CT images clearly illustrated the differences between the included carcinomas and sarcomas. [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT clearly delineated all carcinomas, except the mammary adenocarcinoma of dog 9, but none of the sarcomas after 24 h (Figure 2a-f). Importantly, the observed heterogeneity in tumor voxel uptake levels could be visually appreciated even in tumors displaying avid accumulation of [Cu-64]-liposomes (Figure 2c-d). PET/CT images of all 11 dogs are shown in Supplementary Figure S1 and S2. The observed difference in accumulation levels of [Cu-64]-liposomes between carcinomas and sarcomas are illustrated by the tumor maximum to blood mean and tumor mean to blood mean ratios, as well as tumor to liver and muscle ratios (Figure 3). The tumor-to-reference tissue ratios identify differences between tumors and underline the variation in tumor targeting potential of liposomal systems for different malignancies. The tumor-to-blood ratios between the 1-hour and 24-hour time point gives information about the extravasation of liposomes into tumor tissue. Most noteworthy is that we observe an increase in the tumor max to blood mean ratio between the 1-hour and 24-hour scans in all except one of the carcinomas but only see such an increase in one of the sarcomas (Figure 3a). Also, we only observe a very high increase in tumor mean to blood mean ratio in 2 of the dogs investigated (Figure 3b), which underlines the heterogeneity in the EPR-effect in the investigated tumor types.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 3. Tumor-to-reference tissue activity ratios. Tumor maximum to blood mean (Tmax/Bmean) and tumor mean to blood mean (Tmean/Bmean) activity ratios on the 1-hour and 24-hour PET scans (a and b) and tumor maximum to liver mean (Tmax/Lmean) and tumor mean activity to liver mean (Tmean/Lmean) (c) and muscle mean (Mmean) (d) activity ratios at the 24-hour PET scan. Carcinomas (☐) and sarcomas ().

We generated histograms of voxel %ID/kg to provide an analysis of the voxel activity distribution (Supplementary Figure S3). From the histograms the heterogeneity in [Cu-64]-liposome activity can be readily appreciated for all tumors. In order to obtain acceptable lesion identification a lesion to background ratio (e.g. tumor-to-muscle ratio) above 1.5 is generally required.26 All of the included tumors displayed a Tmax/Mmean ratio above 1.5. However, for the sarcomas less than 30% of tumor voxels displayed an acceptable ratio whereas the majority of voxels displayed a Tvoxel/Mmean ratio above 1.5 for the included carcinomas, except dog 9 (Supplementary Figure S4). We identified multiple pulmonary and lymph node metastases on the FDG PET/CT scans from dog 2 and these displayed [Cu-64]-liposome activity (Figure 4a-b). The lymph node metastases were confirmed by cytology. FDG uptake was observed in the metastatic lesions (mean SUV 3.5 – 6.8 and maximum SUV 5.3 – 16.7). Mean 24-hour [Cu-64]-liposome SUV for metastatic lesions ranged from 0.9 – 2.1 and maximum SUV from 1.3 – 7.9. These observations suggest that the EPReffect may also exist in metastases originating from primary EPR-positive tumors, thus suggesting that at least some macroscopic metastases will benefit from nanocarrier based drug delivery systems. No metastases were identified in any of the remaining dogs.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 4. Transversal, coronal and sagittal [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT images after a distribution period of 24 h in dog 2. (a) Transversal PET/CT image, [Cu-64]-liposome uptake can be appreciated in the axillary lymph node (arrows) and in the larger centrally located blood vessels, (b) transversal PET/CT image, [Cu64]-liposome uptake can be appreciated in the tumor (arrows), larger blood vessels and in the spleen located above the tumor. The high [Cu-64]-liposome activity levels in the blood can be appreciated in the heart ventricles, larger blood vessels, liver and spleen visualized in the coronal plane (c) and sagittal plane (d). Brain (yellow arrow), heart displaying the difference between blood activity in heart chambers and heart musculature (red arrow), liver (white arrow), where the circular gall bladder can be appreciated as a circular structure within the liver without any noteworthy [Cu-64]-liposome uptake, spleen (blue arrow) and urinary bladder (green arrow).

Kinetics and biodistribution. We derived time activity curves (TAC) for blood, liver and spleen

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 25

Page 11 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

from the dynamic PET scan acquired during the initial 40 min of liposome distribution (including the infusion period), reconstructed at 1-minute intervals, and from the 24-hour PET scan (Figure 5a). The %ID/cm3 increases in the blood during the 20-minute infusion period and decreases to reach a mean of 0.039 %ID/cm3 (SEM 0.014) after a distribution period of 24 h (Figure 5a-b). The %ID/cm3 in the liver and spleen increased during the infusion and reached mean uptakes of 0.025 ID%/cm3 (SEM 0.007) and 0.014 ID%/cm3 (SEM 0.005) after 24 h. Considering the blood volume in liver and spleen, the non-blood associated [Cu-64]-liposome activity in these organs increases over the 24 h period. This indicates that the PEGylated liposomes undergo the expected elimination by the reticuloendothelial system. We observed no signs of liposome leakage of Cu-DOTA on the PET images, i.e. we observed no increase in activity in the urinary bladder, we observed normal spleen or liver uptake (the standard liposome clearance organs) and the PET image analysis conveyed what could be expected for long-circulating liposomes. Comparison of [Cu-64]liposomes, free [Cu-64]-DOTA and free [Cu-64(aq)] was performed in mice to determine differences in biodistribution and accumulation kinetics (Supplementary Figure S5). Kinetics and biodistribution of the three [Cu-64] compositions indicate that [Cu-64]-liposomes are stable in dogs, i.e. no indication of leakage of [Cu-64]-DOTA was observed. Additionally, a study where [Cu-64]liposomes were incubated in canine plasma revealed that the stability of [Cu-64]-liposomes was very high with 99%) electroplated on a silver disc backing. A proton beam of 16 MeV and a beam current of 20 mA were used. After irradiation, the target was transferred to the laboratory for further chemical processing where [Cu-64] was isolated using ion exchange chromatography. Final evaporation from aqueous HCl yielded [Cu-64] as [Cu-64]Cl2. [Cu-64] labeled liposomes. Purified DOTA-containing liposomes were added to the vial containing the radioactive [Cu-64]Cl2 followed by incubation at 50-55°C for 60 min. The fraction of un-entrapped [Cu-64]-DOTA in the loaded [Cu-64]-liposome solution was quantified by separating [Cu-64]-DOTA from [Cu-64]-liposomes by size exclusion chromatography using a Sephadex G-50 column (1x25 cm) eluted with a HEPES buffer (10 mM, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). The fraction of un-entrapped free [Cu-64] in the [Cu-64]-liposome solution was quantified by separating un-entrapped [Cu-64] from [Cu-64]-DOTA by radio-thin layer chromatography (radioTLC). The radiochemical purity of the produced radiolabeled [Cu-64]-liposomes was >95% in all productions used in this study. Before infusion, Empty-liposomes (4.3 mg lipid/kg canine) were

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

added to the [Cu-64]-liposomes solution to ensure injection of a sufficient amount of liposomes to make them long circulating.

PET/CT. PET/CT scans were performed using a combined PET/CT scanner (Biograph 40 PET/CT or Biograph 64 PET/CT, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany); consisting of a high resolution PET scanner (4 x 4 mm LSO crystal elements, 32,440 LSO crystals, 21.6 cm axial field) and a 40 or 64-row multi-slice CT scanner. CT parameters used were a slice thickness of 3.0 mm, 120 kV, 170 mAs, pitch 1.2, collimation 24 x 1.2 mm and a B30 kernel. The PET scans were acquired using static image acquisition and dynamic list mode acquisition. Images were reconstructed using a 3D acquisition mode and attenuation corrected using the concurrent CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using TrueX® (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) 3D reconstruction (21 iterations, 3 subsets), and smoothed using a Gaussian filter having a FWHM of 2 mm in all directions, and a matrix size of 336 x 336.

Study procedure FDG PET/CT (day 1). The dogs were fasted for a minimum of 12 h prior to imaging and all were confirmed to have normal serum glucose concentrations. Dogs were premedicated with Methadone (0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg IM). FDG was injected intravenously as a bolus. Dogs received a mean FDG activity of 7.0 MBq/kg (range: 3.8-9.85 MBq/kg). All dogs were visually monitored after FDG administration. Following a distribution period for the tracer (mean 61 min (range: 56-67 min)), anaesthesia was performed using a continuous infusion of propofol (15-25 mg/kg/h), and provided with 100% oxygen via a tracheal tube. FDG PET/CT scans were performed as a 3-minute multi field of view (FOV) whole body PET scan.

Study procedure [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT (day 2 and 3). [Cu-64]-liposome PET scans were performed as two separate scanning session commencing between 24 and 48 h after the FDG PET/CT scan. The first [Cu-64]-liposome scan was initiated simultaneously with the infusion of radiolabeled liposomes (termed day 1-hour scan) and the second liposome scan was performed approximately 24 h after (termed day 24-hour scan). Anesthesia was conducted as for the FDG PET/CT scan and all dogs received 2 mg/kg dexamethasone disodium phosphate ~2 h prior to infusion of [Cu-64]-liposomes to minimize risks for immunogenic reactions. Radiolabeled liposomes were infused at increasing rates over a period of 20 min using an automated injection pump. Infusion rates were; 0.5 ml/min (0-5 min), 1.0 ml/min (5-10 min), 2.5 ml/min (10-15 min)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 25

Page 19 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

and 4 ml/min (15-20 min) for a total infusion volume of 40 ml. Dogs received a mean [Cu-64]liposomal activity of ~10 MBq/kg. The 1-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT scan was performed as a dynamic list mode acquisition. In dogs 1 to 6 the PET scanner FOV was positioned to cover the liver and spleen region for the initial 0-40 min. After 40 min the PET scanner FOV was moved to the tumor region for a 20-minute dynamic list mode acquisition. Dynamic list mode data were temporally reconstructed into images at 1 min intervals and the list mode data from the tumor region was additionally reconstructed into a summarized 5-minute image based on 55-60 min list mode data. The tumor of dog 2 could not be covered by a single FOV and an additional static 2.5-minute FOV scan was performed to cover the entire tumor volume and these images served as the basis for determining tumor uptake values at the 1-hour scans. The 24-hour [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT scan was initiated by a static 5 min FOV acquisition in the tumor region followed by a 2.5 min FOV whole body PET scan. [Cu-64]-liposome PET/CT scan were reconstructed using the same TrueX® reconstruction algorithm and parameters as for the FDG PET scans and attenuation corrected using the concurrently acquired CT scan.

Image analysis. Attenuation corrected and reconstructed PET/CT images were post processed using commercial software (Pmod, ver. 3.304, Pmod Technologies, Switzerland). Tumor volumes of interests (VOIs) were manually delineated on the FDG PET/CT and [Cu-64]liposome PET/CT scans, without applying any threshold for the PET uptake following the different malignancies being evaluated. FDG uptake was reported as tumor mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV). Tumor uptake of [Cu-64]-liposome on the 1-hour (5-minute reconstruction, 55-60 min list mode data) and 24-hour tumor scans were reported as tumor mean and maximum SUV and 24-hour scan voxel uptake histogram constructed. Tumor uptake percentage of injected dose (%ID) was calculated for the whole tumor and for voxel mean and maximum. Intratumoral heterogeneity of liposome accumulation was investigated by constructing voxel uptake histograms of tumor VOIs based on the 24-hour PET images. Pulmonary and lymph node metastases were identified and delineated in dog 2, the uptake levels of FDG and [Cu-64]-liposome are reported as for the primary tumors. PET time activity curves (PET-TAC) for blood, liver and spleen were generated from the 1-hour scan on temporally reconstructed images. Blood activity was determined by generating a large VOI around the aorta and subsequently segmenting the VOI by an 80% of maximum threshold to

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

minimize partial volume effects and non-blood associated activity. VOIs manually drawn well within the margins of liver and spleen on five consecutive image slices were used for the determination of temporal activity. PET Blood activity for the determination of tumor to blood ratios at the 1-hour PET scan was estimated by decay correcting average blood activity 38-40 min post-injection (pi) to the 1-hour time point of tumor activity. For technical reasons TAC curves were not constructed for dogs 9 and 10. [Cu-64]-liposome biodistribution and tumor to reference tissue uptake ratios at the 24-hour whole body PET scan 24 h after liposome infusion were evaluated by constructing reference VOIs in the following tissues; aorta, liver, spleen, muscle (average of five regions), lung (peripheral region), bone marrow (proximal humerus, representing red bone marrow), ventricular septum, parotid salivary glands, urinary bladder and gall bladder. All regions were drawn well within the margins of tissues and organs and excluding regions containing larger blood vessels, e.g. the hilar region of the liver, to avoid artifacts and minimize partial volume effects and respiratory movement. Aorta VOIs were constructed as described above. Ventricular septum VOIs was formed by PET uptake based on segmentation to minimize the effects of blood activity in heart ventricles and heart movement during scanning. In short a spherical VOI including the right and left heart ventricles and ventricular septum was constructed and segmentation performed.

Time activity curves (TACs). TACs were generated for the individual dogs by collecting multiple blood samples. Blood samples were collected as allowed for during and after the [Cu-64]liposome PET/CT scans without interfering with scanning procedures. Ten dogs had blood samples collected between 11 to 1509 min after completing the liposome infusion. EDTA stabilized blood samples were well counted (Gamma counter, Perkin Elmer, Australia) in triplicates and decay corrected specific blood activity of [Cu-64]-liposome calculated. The relative percentage of [Cu64]-liposome in circulation was estimated from an expected blood mass of 8% of total body weight and relative blood content plotted against distribution period. Circulating half-life of liposomes was calculated using the non-linear one-phase exponential decay equation: y = Ae-kt, t1/2 = 0.693/k. Acknowledgements. Financial support was kindly provided by the Danish Strategic Research Council (NABIIT) Ref. 2106-07-0033, The Lundbeck Foundation (Fellowship program) and the European Research Council (ERC grant). The funding sources were not involved or influenced the design and execution of the study or publication in any way.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 25

Page 21 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Supporting Information Available. PET images of all 11 dogs (Figure S1 and S2), Histograms displaying voxel-wise uptake characteristics of %ID/kg [Cu-64]-liposome in tumor from included dogs (Figure S3), Histograms displaying voxel-wise tumorvoxel-to-musclemean ratios [Cu-64]liposome activity (Figure S4), PET/CT images of [64-Cu(aq)], [Cu-64]-DOTA and [Cu-64]liposomes in mice (Figure S5) and In vitro stability test of liposomes loaded with

64

Cu in dog

plasma (Figure S6). This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References 1. Barenholz, Y. Doxil(R)-the First FDA-approved Nano-drug: Lessons Learned. J. Controlled Release 2012, 160, 117-134. 2. Hrkach, J.; Von Hoff, D.; Ali, M. M.; Andrianova, E.; Auer J.; Campbell, T.; De Witt, D.; Figa, M.; Figueiredo, M.; Horhota, A.; et al. Preclinical Development and Clinical Translation of a PSMA-Targeted Docetaxel Nanoparticle with a Differentiated Pharmacological Profile. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 128ra39. 3. Matsumura, Y.; Maeda, H. A New Concept for Macromolecular Therapeutics in Cancer Chemotherapy: Mechanism of Tumoritropic Accumulation of Proteins and the Antitumor Agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 6387-6392. 4. Bangham, A. D. Surrogate Cells or Trojan Horses. The Discovery of Liposomes. BioEssays 1995, 17, 1081-1088. 5. Iyer, A. K.; Khaled, G.; Fang, J.; Maeda, H. Exploiting the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Tumor Targeting. Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 812-818. 6. Zhang, L.; Gu, F. X.; Chan, J. M.; Wang, A. Z.; Langer, R. S.; Farokhzad, O. C. Nanoparticles in Medicine: Therapeutic Applications and Developments. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2008, 83, 761-769. 7. Folkman, J. Fundamental Concepts of the Angiogenic Process. Curr. Mol. Medicine 2003, 3, 643-651. 8. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646674.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

9. Maeda, H.; Bharate, G. Y.; Daruwalla, J. Polymeric Drugs for Efficient Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery based on EPR-effect. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009, 71, 409-419. 10. Fang, J.; Nakamura, H.; Maeda, H. The EPR effect: Unique Features of Tumor Blood Vessels for Drug Delivery, Factors Involved, and Limitations and Augmentation of the Effect. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 136-151. 11. Denison, T. A.; Bae, Y. H. Tumor Heterogeneity and its Implication for Drug Delivery. J. Controlled Release 2012, 164, 187-191. 12. Connolly, D. T.; Heuvelman, D. M.; Nelson, R.; Olander, J. V.; Eppley, B. L.; Delfino, J. J.; Siegel, N. R.; Leimgruber, R. M.; Feder, J. Tumor Vascular Permeability Factor Stimulates Endothelial Cell Growth and Angiogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 1989, 84, 1470-1478. 13. Minko, T.; Kopeckova, P.; Pozharov, V.; Jensen, K. D.; Kopecek, J. The Influence of Cytotoxicity of Macromolecules and of VEGF Gene Modulated Vascular Permeability on the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Resistant Solid Tumors. Pharm. Res. 2000, 17, 505-514. 14. Safra, T. Cardiac Safety of Liposomal Anthracyclines. Oncologist 2003, 8, 17-24. 15. Harrington, K. J.; Mohammadtaghi, S.; Uster, P. S.; Glass, D.; Peters, A. M.; Vile, R. G.; Stewart, J. S. Effective Targeting of Solid Tumors in Patients with Locally Advanced Cancers by Radiolabeled Pegylated Liposomes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 243-254. 16. Presant, C. A.; Blayney, D.; Proffitt, R. T.; Turner, A. F.; Williams, L. E.; Nadel, H. I.; Kennedy, P.; Wiseman, C.; Gala, K.; Crossley, R. J.; et al. Preliminary report: Imaging of Kaposi Sarcoma and Lymphoma in AIDS with Indium-111-labelled Liposomes. Lancet 1990, 335, 1307-1309. 17. Khalifa, A.; Dodds, D.; Rampling, R.; Paterson, J.; Murray, T. Liposomal Distribution in Malignant Glioma: Possibilities for Therapy. Nucl. Med. Commun. 1997, 18, 17-23. 18. Presant, C. A.; Proffitt, R. T.; Turner, A. F.; Williams, L. E.; Winsor, D.; Werner, J. L.; Kennedy, P.; Wiseman, C.; Gala, K.; McKenna, R. J.; et al. Successful Imaging of Human Cancer with Indium-111-labeled Phospholipid Vesicles. Cancer 1988, 62, 905-911. 19. Paoloni, M.; Khanna, C. Translation of New Cancer Treatments from Pet Dogs to Humans. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 147-156. 20. Gambhir, S. S. Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 683-693.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 25

Page 23 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

21. Phelps, M. E.; Hoffman, E. J.; Mullani, N. A.; Ter-Pogossian, M. M. Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography. J. Nucl. Med. 1975, 16, 210-224. 22. Seo, J. W.; Qin, S.; Mahakian, L. M.; Watson, K. D.; Kheirolomoom, A.; Ferrara, K. W. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of the Stability of Cu-64 labeled Dipalmitoyl and Distearoyl Lipids in Liposomes. J. Controlled Release 2011, 151, 28-34. 23. Willmann, J. K.; van Bruggen, N.; Dinkelborg, L. M.; Gambhir, S. S. Molecular Imaging in Drug Development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2008, 7, 591-607. 24. Petersen, A. L.; Binderup, T.; Rasmussen, P.; Henriksen, J. R.; Elema, D. R.; Kjaer, A.; Andresen, T. L.

64

Cu Loaded Liposomes as Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Agents.

Biomaterials 2011, 32, 2334-2341. 25. Hansen, A. E.; McEvoy, F.; Engelholm, S. A.; Law, I.; Kristensen, A. T. FDG PET/CT Imaging in Canine Cancer Patients. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2011, 52, 201-206. 26. Phillips, W. T. Delivery of Gamma-Imaging Agents by Liposomes. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1999, 37, 13-32. 27. Gabizon, A.; Shmeeda, H.; Barenholz, Y. Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: Review of Animal and Human Studies. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 419-436. 28. Gabizon, A. A. Stealth Liposomes and Tumor Targeting: One Step Further in the Quest for the Magic Bullet. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 223-225. 29. Harrington, K. J.; Rowlinson-Busza, G.; Syrigos, K. N.; Abra, R. M.; Uster, P. S.; Peters, A. M.; Stewart, J. S. Influence of Tumour Size on Uptake of (111)ln-DTPA-labelled Pegylated Liposomes in a Human Tumour Xenograft Model. Br. J. Cancer 2000, 83, 684-688. 30. Petersen, A. L.; Binderup, T.; Jølck, R. I.; Rasmussen, P.; Henriksen, J. R.; Pfeifer, A. K.; Kjaer, A.; Andresen, T. L. Positron Emission Tomography Evaluation of Somatostatin Receptor Targeted

64

Cu-TATE-Liposomes in a Human Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Mouse Model. J.

Controlled Release 2012, 160, 254-263. 31. Cheng, C. J.; Saltzman, W. M. Nanomedicine: Downsizing Tumour Therapeutics. Nat. Nanotech. 2012, 7, 346-347. 32. Manzoor, A. A.; Lindner, L. H.; Landon, C. D.; Park, J. Y.; Simnick, A. J.; Dreher, M. R.; Das, S.; Hanna, G.; Park, W.; Chilkoti, A.; et al. Overcoming Limitations in Nanoparticle Drug Delivery: Triggered, Intravascular Release to Improve Drug Penetration into Tumors. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5566-5575.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

33. Gillies, R. J.; Verduzco, D.; Gatenby, R. A. Evolutionary Dynamics of Carcinogenesis and why Targeted Therapy does not work. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 487-493.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 25

Page 25 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

TOC Graphics

ACS Paragon Plus Environment