Adaptive Stress Response Pathways Induced by Environmental

Apr 29, 2015 - Tang , J. Y. M.; McCarty , S.; Glenn , E.; Neale , P. A.; Warne , M. S. J.; Escher , B. I. Mixture effects of organic micropollutants p...
2 downloads 11 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV

Article

Adaptive stress response pathways induced by environmental mixtures of bioaccumulative chemicals in dugongs Ling Jin, Caroline Gaus, and Beate I. Escher Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00947 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Apr 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 17, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Adaptive stress response pathways induced by

2

environmental mixtures of bioaccumulative

3

chemicals in dugongs

4 Ling Jin,† Caroline Gaus,† and Beate I. Escher†,‡,ǁ,*

5 6



The University of Queensland, National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (Entox),

7 8 9

Brisbane, QLD, Australia ‡

UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Cell Toxicology, Leipzig, Germany ǁ

Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Environmental Toxicology, Center for Applied

10

Geosciences, Germany

11 12 13 14

Key words: bioanalytical equivalent, metabolic activation, mixture toxicity, passive sampling,

15

polydimethylsiloxane

16 17 18

1 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

19

ABSTRACT

20

To address the poorly understood mixture effects of chemicals in the marine mammal dugong,

21

we coupled equilibrium-based passive sampling in blubber to a range of in vitro bioassays for

22

screening mixtures of bioaccumulative chemicals. The modes of action included early effect

23

indicators along important toxicity pathways, such as induction of xenobiotic metabolism, and

24

some integrative indicators downstream of the molecular initiating event, such as adaptive stress

25

responses. Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress

26

response were found to be the most prominent effects, while the p53-mediated DNA damage

27

response and NF-κB-mediated response to inflammation were not significantly affected. While

28

polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) quantified in the samples accounted for the majority

29

of AhR-mediated activity, PCDDs explained less than 5% of the total oxidative stress response,

30

despite their known ability to activate this pathway. Altered oxidative stress response was

31

observed with both individual chemicals and blubber extracts subject to metabolic activation by

32

rat liver S9 fraction. Metabolic activation resulted in both enhanced and reduced toxicity,

33

suggesting the relevance and utility of incorporating metabolic enzymes into in vitro bioassays.

34

Our approach provides a first insight into the burden of toxicologically relevant bioaccumulative

35

chemical mixtures in dugongs and can be applied to lipid tissue of other wildlife species.

36

2 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 2 of 39

Page 3 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

37

INTRODUCTION

38

The (sub)tropical coastal zone of Queensland, Australia sustains diverse and unique ecosystems

39

where, for instance, extensive seagrass habitats nearshore provide food sources for the strictly

40

herbivorous marine mammal dugong (Dugong dugon). The nearshore environment is receiving

41

land-based chemical contaminants, including persistent bioaccumulative toxic (PBT) chemicals,

42

via agricultural, industrial sources and urban runoff.1 The unique feeding habit of dugongs

43

determines their inevitable uptake of contaminants associated with the sediment-seagrass system.

44

Long life spans and high lipid content render dugongs prone to accumulation of hydrophobic

45

organic chemicals such as dioxin-like chemicals to levels that may lead to adverse health

46

effects.2-4 In reality, however, dugongs are exposed to a much broader spectrum of known and

47

unknown chemicals, in addition to those chemicals targeted in previous investigations.5-7 A

48

quantitative, mechanistic understanding of the toxicological implications of these chemical

49

mixtures is required to fully establish the role of PBT chemical burdens in the health of dugong

50

populations; however, little is known about the combined effects of these complex and

51

unresolved mixtures.

52 53

While an archive of dugong blubber samples provided an opportunity to understand PBT

54

chemical exposure and mixture effect, our attempts to investigate such mixture effects using

55

bioanalytical tools have been hindered by conventional exhaustive solvent extraction methods.

56

These traditional methods often require select extraction solvents and extensive clean-up efforts

57

to minimize (bio)analytical interferences caused by biological matrices (e.g., lipid),8, 9 thus

58

limiting the sample throughput as well as the spectrum of chemicals captured in the extracts.

3 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 39

59

To address these limitations, we previously established a simple passive sampling technique

60

based on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) polymer for unbiased, quantitative sampling of a range

61

of bioaccumulative chemicals enriched in the dugong blubber.10 While PDMS can only extract

62

neutral organic chemicals, the spectrum of chemicals covered reflects those accumulated in

63

typical fatty tissue, such as dugong blubber. Governed by a generally constant lipid-PDMS

64

partition coefficient (Klip-PDMS) of 30 for chemicals across a range of physicochemical properties,

65

chemical mixture compositions in the sample are thereby proportionally transferred into in

66

PDMS.10 In our previous study,10 we demonstrated that the passive sampling technique can be

67

linked to in vitro bioassay based screening without the need for clean-up steps to remove lipid

68

matrices. The application was validated with a receptor-mediated endpoint, the activation of the

69

reporter gene by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which specifically responds to dioxin-like

70

chemicals.10 Although the chemical mass transfer from lipid to PDMS is typically low (e.g., 2-3%

71

under a mass ratio of 0.5 g blubber to 0.235 g PDMS (one PDMS disk)), PDMS-based passive

72

sampling meets the detection limit of the AhR-based bioassay, and up-scaling of the PDMS

73

amount can increase the mass of chemicals extracted from blubber in order for a detectable

74

response in other less sensitive bioassays.10 Note that unlike for passive sampling of the freely

75

dissolved phase, the PBT chemical mass in the blubber sample can be depleted without

76

compromising the mass-balance calculations.11

77 78

In addition to the AhR, previous efforts exploring exposure and effect in marine wildlife species

79

mainly focused on specific hormone receptor-mediated effects related to endocrine disruption,

80

specifically that of estrogen,9, 12-14 androgen,8, 9 and thyroid hormone receptors.15-17 Beyond these

81

specific receptor-mediated modes of action, non-specific and reactive modes of action are,

4 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 5 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

82

however, equally important in toxicological screening. Among them, adaptive stress response

83

pathway systems offer a set of cellular defense mechanisms protecting cells from damaging

84

processes, such as oxidative stress, DNA damage and inflammation, which can be caused by a

85

more diverse range of environmental chemicals than those specifically targeting nuclear

86

receptors.18 Together with specific modes of action, adaptive stress response mechanisms form

87

vital early effect indicators, thus serving as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening of both

88

individual chemicals and environmental mixtures.18

89 90

In vitro bioassays based on activation of Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response, for example,

91

have been used to screen a myriad of environmental chemicals.19-22 These bioassays have also

92

been extensively applied to benchmark organic micropollutants for water quality assessment21, 23-

93

28

94

mediated DNA damage response and NF-κB-mediated inflammation responses have also been

95

applied for these purposes.27, 28 However, the toxicological relevance of these pathways with

96

regards to bioaccumulative chemicals in wildlife samples has been scarcely explored.

and in few cases for sediment sample screening.29 In vitro bioassays indicative of p53-

97 98

The present study thus extended the application of PDMS-based passive sampling beyond AhR

99

signaling to in vitro bioassays indicative of key stress response pathways (oxidative stress, DNA

100

damage and inflammation). Using this toxicologically relevant test battery, we conducted an

101

initial hazard screening for dugongs by investigating which modes of action are relevant to

102

chemicals present in dugong blubber and evaluating the dynamic range of the biologically active

103

chemical burdens across individual samples. According to the results of individual chemical

104

profiling in the bioassays, selected potent chemicals were instrumentally analyzed for dugong

5 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

105

samples, and mixed at the ratio found in each sample to form a defined mixture. The mixture

106

experiments were performed with each of these defined mixtures to understand the extent to

107

which it may contribute to the combined effect of the corresponding blubber extract.

108 109

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

110

Materials and chemicals. PDMS disks (thickness of 1 mm, diameter of 16 mm, density of 1.17

111

g cm-3) were prepared from medical grade PDMS sheet (Specialty Silicone Products, Inc.

112

Ballston, Spa, NY, USA). The chemical standards purchased from Sigma Aldrich (purity >97%)

113

included polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated

114

diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), organochlorine (OC) and

115

pyrethroid pesticides (Table 1). Solvents included acetone (analytical grade; Merck, Darmstadt,

116

Germany), hexane (analytical grade; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO USA), toluene (analytical

117

grade; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), methanol (analytical grade; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)

118

and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma Aldrich; St Louis, MO USA).

119 120

Dugong blubber samples. All the blubber samples (from the ventral line beneath the

121

hypodermis) were collected from dugongs stranded along the Queensland coast from 1998-2012

122

(more information in SI, Table SI-1). The samples were archived at -20°C at Entox, The

123

University of Queensland. The lipid content of each dugong blubber sample ranged from 21-92%

124

(median: 73%; SI, Section SI-1, Table SI-2, Figure SI-1).

125 126

PDMS-based passive sampling of bioaccumulative chemicals from blubber. Chemical

127

sampling from dugong blubber followed our previously established procedure.10 Briefly, a

128

PDMS disk (thickness of 1 mm, diameter of 16 mm, ~235 mg) was sandwiched between a

6 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 6 of 39

Page 7 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

129

blubber slice pair (~0.25 g per slice). The high lipid content of the tested blubber samples

130

ensured rapid equilibration of chemicals between PDMS and dugong blubber during passive

131

sampling ( dioxin-like PCBs > PAHs measured in the CAFLUX assay

313

was consistent with findings in similar in vitro systems measuring AhR activity.42, 43

314 315

Eleven out of 21 chemicals tested were positive for Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response

316

without S9 treatment with ECIR1.5 values spanning approximately five orders of magnitude

317

(Figure 2A; Table 2; SI, Table SI-6). For the ten chemicals tested negative for Nrf2 activation,

318

no cytotoxicity was observed across the dosed concentration range indicating that a response was

319

not prevented by cytotoxicity, but the chemicals did not activate the Nrf2 pathway. Pyrene, OC

320

pesticides (p,p’-DDT and p,p’-DDD) and BDE 47 are of similar potency ranking to previously

321

reported compounds, including less hydrophobic pesticides, pharmaceuticals and disinfection

322

byproducts.21 Except for OCDD, which did not reach IR of 1.5 albeit showing an upward trend,

323

it is interesting to note that PCDDs, dioxin-like PCBs and BaP, which are primarily AhR ligands,

324

were among the most potent in activating the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response pathway.

325 326

A closer examination of the AhR-active compounds (PCDDs, PCBs and PAHs) revealed that the

327

rank order of ECIR1.5 for Nrf2 induction in the AREc32 assay followed that of their EC50 for AhR

15 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

328

activation in the CAFLUX assay (Figure 2B). While PCDDs, PCBs and B[k]F align along the

329

1:10 line, B[b]F at the 1:1 line and BaP at the 10:1 line between the two EC values, these

330

apparent ratios do not imply the exact quantitative relationship between the two pathways, as the

331

AREc32 and CAFLUX assays differ in sensitivity and mechanisms. However, the 10- or100-fold

332

differences in the two ratios should be noted, which distinguishes more persistent dioxin-like

333

chemicals from more labile PAH compounds. This means degradation of B[b]F and BaP

334

rendered them less effective in AhR activation and more effective in Nrf2-mediated oxidative

335

stress response than if they would persist in parent forms.

Page 16 of 39

336 337

The mechanism by which AhR ligands activate Nrf2 is not fully understood, because these

338

chemicals are by definition not electrophiles directly causing oxidative and/or electrophilic stress

339

on the Nrf2-mediated signaling pathway.44 However, crosstalk mechanisms between AhR and

340

Nrf2 signaling have been suggested for production of reactive oxygen species following AhR

341

binding,45, 46 and thus may explain the activation of Nrf2-mediated pathway. Metabolically active

342

AhR ligands such as PAHs can be transformed by cytochrome (CYP) P450 metabolic enzymes

343

(e.g., CYP1A1) into more reactive metabolites, such as epoxide, which trigger the Nrf2-mediated

344

pathway. While the MCF7 cell, on which the AREc32 assay is based, is generally low in

345

metabolic activity due to the low expression of various metabolic enzymes, it, however, contains

346

a significant amount of endogenous AhR and CYP1A1.47

347 348

None of the 21 chemicals tested showed any significant effect in the p53 and NF-kB assays, and

349

no cytotoxicity was observed across the tested concentration range (Table 2; SI, Table SI-6). In a

350

recent study28 on profiling disinfection byproducts on the p53 pathway, a narrow concentration-

351

response window was observed between p53 induction and cytotoxicity, that is, the endpoint

16 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 17 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

352

induction cannot be specifically distinguished from cytoxicity. This agrees with the biochemical

353

understanding that the p53 activation in the final steps leading to cell fate selection, such as

354

apoptosis, when cellular stress response mechanisms are overwhelmed by external stimuli.18 As

355

the highest concentration of each test chemical reached or exceeded their estimated medium

356

solubility limits, no higher concentration can be used to observe endpoint induction or a decline

357

in cell viability.

358 359

Relevance of modes of action to chemical mixtures in blubber samples. The response of the

360

four biological endpoints tested with extracts of dugong blubber samples mirrored that of the

361

tested individual chemicals. Generally, AhR-mediated activity and Nrf2-mediated oxidative

362

stress response were more prominent effects triggered by samples, while none of the 34 dugong

363

blubber extracts resulted in a p53-mediated DNA damage response or NF-κB-mediated response

364

to inflammation.

365 366

One third (12 out of 34) of the blubber samples induced AhR activation and two thirds (22 out of

367

34) triggered an oxidative stress response. The effect elicited by these samples via both modes of

368

action span a little more than one order of magnitude, ranging from 10-8

>10-8

-S9 -11

NFκB (ECIR1.5, M)

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

TCDD

1746-01-6

6.67

2.39(±0.29)×10

3.99(±0.44)×10

1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

PeCDD

40321-76-4

7.08

1.94(±0.35)×10-11

5.07(±0.57)×10-10

7.82(±0.61)×10-10

>10-8

>10-8

-11

-9

-9

-8

>10-8

1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1,2,3,4,5,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-pdioxin 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-pdioxin 2,2’,5,5’-tetrachlorobiphenyl 2,2',4,5,5’-pentachlorobiphenyl

HxCDD

39227-28-6

7.56

5.63(±0.70)×10

2.08(±0.21)×10

2.78(±0.33)×10

>10

HpCDD

35822-46-9

8.17

1.88(±0.52)×10-10

4.11(±0.24)×10-9

6.33(±0.47)×10-9

>10-8

>10-8

OCDD

3268-87-9

8.64

5.68(±0.81)×10-9

>10-8

>10-8

>10-8

>10-8

PCB 52

35693-99-3

6.34

>10-4

>10-4

>10-4

>10-5

>10-5

PCB 101

37680-73-2

6.80

>8×10-5

>5×10-6

>5×10-6

>8×10-5 -9

>8×10-5 -8

-8

-5

>10-5

3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl

PCB 126

57465-28-8

6.98

1.82(±0.39)×10

2.28(±0.12)×10

3.60(±0.28)×10

>10

3,3',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl

PCB 169

56-25-7

7.41

1.05(±0.12)×10-8

1.71(±0.11)×10-7

3.12(±0.37)×10-7

>10-6

>10-6

BaP

50-32-8

6.44

3.45(±0.61)×10-5

3.42(±0.56)×10-6

5.98(±0.24)×10-7

>5×10-6

>5×10-6

5.78

-7

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Benzo[a]pyrene #

Benzo[b]fluoranthene

#

Benzo[k]fluoranthene

B[b]F

205-99-2

8.98(±0.46)×10

-8

9.05×10

-7 -7

B[k]F

207-08-9

6.11

5.66(±0.37)×10

8.32×10

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Pyrene

Pyr

129-0-0

4.88

>10-4

5.58(±0.69)×10-5

2.72(±0.16)×10-6

>10-5

>10-5

Phenanthrene

Phe

85-1-8

4.46

>10-4

>8×10-5

9.80(±0.85)×10-6

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

BDE 47

5436-43-1

6.81

>5×10-5

1.27(±0.07)×10-5

>2.5×10-5

>10-5

>10-5

BDE 209

1163-19-5

9.87

>2×10-5

>2×10-5

>2×10-5

>10-6

>10-6

p,p'-DDT

50-29-3

6.91

>5×10-5

1.14(±0.04)×10-5

>2.5×10-5

>10-5

>10-5

-5

-5

-5

>10-5

2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether 2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6'decabromodiphenyl ether 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane

p,p'-DDD

72-55-9

6.02

>5×10

4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene

p,p'-DDE

72-54-8

6.51

HCB

118-74-1

5.31

Hexachlorobenzene γ-hexachlorocyclohexane

772 773 774 775 776

Page 32 of 39

-5

2.99(±0.15)×10

>5×10

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>10-5

>10-5

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>5×10-6

>5×10-6

-5

>5×10-5

-4

-4

-4

>10

γ-HCH

58-89-9

3.61

>10

Bifenthrin

-

82657-04-3

6.48

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>5×10-5

>10-5

>10-5

Permethrin

-

52645-53-1

6.10

>2.5×10-5

>2.5×10-5

>2.5×10-5

>5×10-6

>5×10-6

#

26

>10

>10

>5×10

ECIR1.5 values of B[b]F and B[k]F for Nrf2 from Tang et al. (n=1); the EC50 for AhR were newly measured for 72 h in consistency with other compounds in this study as Tang et al.26 measured them for 24 h; n.a. = not analyzed. * Data from EPI Suite.52

32 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 33 of 39

777

Environmental Science & Technology

Table 2. Test battery of bioassays used in this study. Cell line

Mode of action

Targeted chemicals

Measured endpoint

Reference compound

CAFLUX

H4IIE rat hepatoma cells

AhR activation indicative of xenobiotic metabolism

dioxin-like chemicals including PAHs

AhR-dependent green fluorescent protein expression

TCDD

AREc-32

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

Nrf2 activation indicative of oxidative stress response

electrophiles and ROSinducing compounds

HCT1666 human colon cancer cells

p53 activation indicative of tumor suppressor gene

genotoxic agents

THP1 human monocytic leukemia cells

NFκB activation indicative of response to inflammation

drugs, endotoxins, immune-modulating compounds

Assay

p53-bla

NFκB-bla

778

33 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Nrf2-dependent luciferase expression p53-dependent βlactamase expression NF-κB-dependent βlactamase expression

TCDD (-S9) BaP (+S9)

mitomycin tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)

Ref 10, 53

32

28

54

Environmental Science & Technology

76x47mm (150 x 150 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 34 of 39

Page 35 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

356x225mm (150 x 150 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Figure 2. (A) Comparisons of EC50 in the CAFLUX assay for AhR-mediated activity (filled triangles) and ECIR1.5 values in the AREc32 assay for Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress (empty triangles) among chemicals tested in this study; (B) Relationship between the ECIR1.5 values of each of the tested AhR-active compounds (ECIR1.5 of B[b]F and B[k]F for Nrf2 from Tang et al.;29 with 24-h exposure, EC50 of B[b]F and B[k]F for AhR re-measured for a 72-h exposure period in consistency with other chemicals tested in the present study. 263x107mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 36 of 39

Page 37 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

Figure 3. Bioanalytical equivalent concentrations of dugong blubber sample extracts (BEQbio,sample) for different modes of action determined in the corresponding bioassays (data from Table SI-8 with conversion of molar concentrations into mass-based concentrations using equation 8; derivation of method detection limit (MDL) in SI, Section SI-8, Table SI-5). 99x68mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Figure 4. Percentage contribution of instrumentally quantified PCDDs to the overall mixture effect in dugong blubber samples (n=5 for AhR; n=10 for Nrf2). 87x71mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 38 of 39

Page 39 of 39

Environmental Science & Technology

257x86mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment