Airborne Virus Capture and Inactivation by an Electrostatic Particle

Jun 23, 2009 - CheonAn City, South Korea, Cybernetics of Chemical. Technology Processes, National Technical University of. Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine, and...
1 downloads 0 Views 651KB Size
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 5940–5946

Airborne Virus Capture and Inactivation by an Electrostatic Particle Collector ERIC M. KETTLESON,† BALA RAMASWAMI,† CHRISTOPHER J. HOGAN, JR.,† MYONG-HWA LEE,‡ GENNADIY A. STATYUKHA,§ PRATIM BISWAS,† AND L A R G U S T . A N G E N E N T * ,| Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, Environmental and Energy Division, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, CheonAn City, South Korea, Cybernetics of Chemical Technology Processes, National Technical University of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine, and Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 214 Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853

Received November 20, 2008. Revised manuscript received May 19, 2009. Accepted June 2, 2009.

Airborne virus capture and inactivation were studied in an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) at applied voltages from -10 to +10 kV using aerosolized bacteriophages T3 and MS2. For each charging scenario, samples were collected from the effluent air stream and assayed for viable phages using plaque assays and for nucleic acids using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays. At higher applied voltages, more virus particles were captured from air with maximum log reductions of 6.8 and 6.3 for the plaque assay and 4.2 and 3.5 for the qPCR assay at -10 kV for T3 and MS2, respectively. Beyond corona inception (i.e., at applied voltages of -10, -8, +8, and +10 kV), log reduction values obtained with the plaque assay were much higher compared to those of the qPCR assay because nonviable particles, while present in the effluent, were unaccounted for in the plaque assay. Comparisons of these assays showed that in-flight inactivation (i.e., inactivation without capture) was greater for the highest applied voltages with a log inactivation of 2.6 for both phages at -10 kV. We have demonstrated great potential for virus capture and inactivation via continual ion and reactive species bombardment when conditions in the ESP are enforced to generate a corona discharge.

Introduction According to the World Health Organization, the most prevalent transmissible diseases in the world are respiratory infections (1). These infections, originating from bacterial or viral exposure, may be transmitted in indoor environments via a number of different ways, including direct or indirect * Corresponding author tel: +1-607-255-2480; fax: +1-607-2554080; e-mail: [email protected]. † Washington University in St. Louis. ‡ Korea Institute of Industrial Technology. § National Technical University of Ukraine. | Cornell University. 5940

9

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 43, NO. 15, 2009

contact with an infected surface, droplet transmission, or aerosol transmission (2). Aerosol transmission is defined as host inhalation of infectious nuclei (