Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS
Article
Anti-biofouling Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane Modified by Quaternary Ammonium Compound: Direct Contact-killing versus Induced Indirect Contact-killing Xingran Zhang, Jinxing Ma, Chuyang Y. Tang, Zhiwei Wang, How Yong Ng, and Zhichao Wu Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00902 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Apr 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 25, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Anti-biofouling Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane Modified by
2
Quaternary Ammonium Compound: Direct Contact-killing versus
3
Induced Indirect Contact-killing
4 5
Xingran Zhang1, Jinxing Ma1, Chuyang Y. Tang2, Zhiwei Wang*,1, How Yong Ng3, Zhichao
6
Wu1
7 8
1
9
Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental
10
2
11
China
12
3
13
University of Singapore, 1 Engineering Drive 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong,
Centre for Water Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National
14 15 16 17 18
Revised Manuscript submitted to: Environmental Science & Technology
19
April 11, 2016
20 21 22 23 24
*Corresponding author: Zhiwei Wang, E-mail:
[email protected], Tel./fax: +86(21)65980400
25 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
26
ABSTRACT
27
Widespread applications of membrane technology call for the development of anti-biofouling
28
membranes. For the traditional contact-killing strategy, the antibacterial action is restricted to
29
the surface: the membrane loses its anti-biofouling efficacy once its surface is completely
30
covered with a fouling layer. However, in this study, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)
31
microfiltration membranes blended with quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) exhibited
32
a surprisingly lasting antimicrobial activity in the vicinity of the membrane surface. The
33
results indicated that QAC was capable of driving surface segregation with a high structural
34
stability, and the QAC modified membrane shows clear antibacterial effects against both
35
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Covering the modified membrane surface by an
36
abiotic alginate layer resulted in a loss of antibacterial efficiency by 86.2%. In contrast, the
37
antibacterial efficiency was maintained after developing a biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus
38
of 30 µm in thickness. The current study may suggest that bacteria affected by contact-killing
39
might interact with other bacteria in the vicinity, resulting in retarded biofilm growth. The
40
anti-biofouling effect and associated mechanism of the QAC modified membrane were
41
further validated in a membrane bioreactor during long-term operation.
42
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 30
Page 3 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
43
INTRODUCTION
44
In the last two decades, membrane separation technology has been widely used in
45
advanced water and wastewater treatment.1,2 However, membrane fouling, particularly
46
biofouling, results in frequent membrane cleaning and/or replacement and thus significantly
47
increases the overall treatment cost.3-5 Biofouling, i.e., the bacterial colonization on
48
membrane surface and the development of a cohesive biofilm, is a thorny practical
49
problem.6,7 Biofouling can be mitigated through the pretreatment of feed solution and the
50
control of membrane operational conditions (e.g., operating a membrane under moderate
51
flux). A more attractive alternative is to develop anti-biofouling membranes, since this
52
approach has a less significant impact on the cost and operation of the membrane process.8
53
Current strategies for preparing anti-biofouling membranes involve graft polymerization
54
on the membrane surface and in situ membrane surface modification under fabrication, while
55
the latter is more efficacious because the antimicrobial layers or antimicrobial agent on the
56
membrane surfaces have higher structural stability and lower partial blocking of surface
57
pores.9-11 Numerous studies have shown that antimicrobial polymers, nanoparticles (e.g.,
58
silver nanoparticles) and enzymes embedded on the membrane surfaces are capable of
59
inhibiting bacterial proliferation by disrupting the cell membranes of microorganisms that are
60
contacting, and leading to cell death (termed contact-killing).12-16 Meanwhile, there is another
61
possibility that these bound agents can leak out into the boundary layer above the membrane
62
surface to form an inhibition zone (termed release-killing).17-19Although continuous release of
63
biocides can cause an inhibition of microbial adhesion in the vicinity of membrane surfaces,
64
the difficulties in triggering and controlling the release process in the microfiltration or
65
ultrafiltration processes are further complicated with the released agents being able to readily
66
pass through the large pores, resulting in (i) lower concentrations of biocides in the vicinity of
67
membrane surface, (ii) shorter lasting period and (iii) severe concerns that biocides in the 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
68
permeate are likely to cause an environmental risk.18,20 Therefore, particular attention has
69
recently been given to developing and advancing membrane matrix and antimicrobial agents
70
to bring about better contact-killing properties such as stable and lasting anti-biofouling
71
activities.21-24
72
With respect to contact-killing of bacteria, the primary mechanisms for the antimicrobial
73
agents have been well addressed, i.e., bacterial disorganization begins with the agents binding
74
to cell membranes by ionic and/or hydrophobic interactions25-27. Therefore, it is always taken
75
for granted that contact-killing is restricted to membrane surfaces and may lose its efficacy
76
once the membranes are covered with a fouling layer.12 However, in this study, we
77
surprisingly found that the modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) microfiltration
78
membranes, which were blended with quaternary ammonium compound (QAC, a kind of
79
biocide) through a phase inversion method, exhibited a lasting antibacterial activity even
80
when biofouling layers were formed on the membrane surfaces. Despite the possibility that a
81
small amount of QAC might be released into the solution attaining release-killing effect, the
82
results enabled us to put forward a hypothesis that the affected bacteria on the surface might
83
further interact with those in the vicinity, finally retarding cell deposition and biofilm growth.
84
We elucidate this hypothesis in the present work by examining the anti-biofouling
85
properties of the modified PVDF microfiltration membranes using model bacterial
86
suspensions containing Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and
87
also in a membrane bioreactor. In the meantime, QAC release and its contribution to the
88
overall antibacterial activity were monitored. Key questions addressed in this study include:
89
(i) which strategy, e.g., contact-killing or release-killing, accounts for the anti-biofouling
90
behaviours of QAC blended PVDF membranes? (ii) how will the antibacterial activity change
91
once the membrane surface is covered with different foulants? and (iii) what scenario is likely
92
prevailing in the vicinity of membrane surface if contact-killing dominates? 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 30
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
93 94
MATERIALS AND METHODS
95
Reagents. All chemicals used in this work were of analytical reagent grade unless
96
otherwise stated. Commercial grade PVDF was purchased from Solvay Corporation (Solef®
97
6020, Mw = 670~700 kDa). Dimethyl acetamide (DMAC) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
98
used as solvents and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP, Mw = 40 kDa) as a pore-forming additive
99
were obtained from Sinopharm (Shanghai, China). Dodecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium
100
chloride (DDBAC) was used as the model QAC due to its efficient antibacterial activity and
101
low toxicity28, which was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Sodium alginate was received from
102
Sigma Aldrich. All solutions were prepared using deionized (DI) water. Solution pH was
103
adjusted by the addition of 1 M NaOH and 1 M HCl when necessary. McFarland bacterial
104
suspensions of Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC25922) and Gram-positive
105
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, ATCC6538) were prepared by dispersing the colonies from
106
agar slants (Shanghai Weike Biotechnology Corporation) in sterile saline.
107
Membrane Preparation. Membranes used in this study were prepared by a phase
108
inversion method via immersion precipitation. The detailed chemical composition for
109
membrane preparation can be found in Supporting Information (SI) Table S1. Briefly, upon
110
drying at 80 °C for 24 h to eliminate moisture, a predetermined amount of PVDF and PVP
111
were dissolved in a solvent mixture comprised of 50 vol.% DMAC and 50 vol.% DMSO. The
112
suspension was agitated at 80 °C for 48 h to obtain a homogeneous solution. Meanwhile, a
113
QAC solution was prepared by completely dissolving a pre-weighted amount of DDBAC in a
114
DMAC/DMSO solvent mixture. Subsequently, the two solutions were mixed and stirred at 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
115
80 °C overnight followed by degassing under ultrasonication for at least half an hour. Finally,
116
the dope solution was casted uniformly on a non-woven support (Shanghai Tianlue Advanced
117
Textile Co., Ltd.) with a casting knife gap of 250 µm. The casted films were immersed in a
118
deionized water bath at room temperature. The resulting pristine and QAC (0.2 wt.%)
119
blended PVDF membranes were denoted as MP and MQ, respectively.
120
Membrane Characterization. To determine the surface composition of membranes,
121
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS UltraDLD, Kratos Analytical Ltd., U.K.) was
122
performed with the calibration using C 1s = 284.6 eV as a reference. Zeta potential of the
123
membrane surface was measured by a streaming potential analyzer (EKA 1.00, Anton-Paar,
124
Swiss) at a controlled temperature (25 ± 1 °C) in 10 mM KCl according to a procedure as
125
described elsewhere.29 Surface hydrophilicity of the membranes was determined by sessile
126
drop contact angle measurement of water on membranes.30 Each value is shown as the
127
average of at least seven measurements. Measurements of water permeability using DI water
128
were conducted according to the protocol described previously.31 Each reported value was
129
expressed by averaging three measurements.
130
Antibacterial Behaviour Evaluation. A schematic illustrating the antibacterial test
131
procedures for clean membrane coupons can be found in SI Figure S1. Membrane coupons
132
(MP and MQ, active surface area = 2.8 cm2) were rinsed with sterile phosphate buffered
133
saline (PBS) (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) thrice followed by UV sterilization for 30 min. The coupons
134
were then placed in a 12-well plate with the addition of 2 mL of nutrient broth (Sinopharm)
135
and 20 µL of bacterial suspension (about 107 cells mL-1). Subsequently, the plate was
136
incubated in a dark rotary shaker at 100 rpm at 37 °C. Growth curves of E. coli and S. aureus 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 30
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
137
were measured by quantifying the optical density values of culture solutions at 600 nm (i.e.,
138
OD600)32 using a spectrophotometer (TU-1810, PERSEE, China) after different incubation
139
time (t = 0, 3, 6, 18 and 24 h). Each reported value was obtained by averaging 24 individual
140
measurements. Data of the exponential growth phases (3 to 24 h for E. coli and 6 to 24 h for S.
141
aureus) was fitted by the pseudo-first-order kinetics equations (Eqs. 1 and 2): ln
142
143
Xt = µt X0
(1)
ln 2 µ
(2)
τ d=
144
where Xt and X0 are the OD600 values representing the bacterial concentrations at t h and 0 h
145
respectively, µ (h-1) the specific growth rate and τd (h) the doubling time. After 24 h of
146
incubation, the membrane coupons were withdrawn and rinsed three times with sterile PBS to
147
remove any non-adhesive or loosely adhesive bacteria. Visualization of the attached bacteria
148
was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) as
149
described previously.33
150
Additional tests were performed to determine whether release-killing is the prevailing
151
mechanism responsible for the antibacterial behaviours of MQ. Briefly, sterile membrane
152
coupons (active area of 2.8 cm2) were placed in 12-well plates containing 2 mL of nutrient
153
broth in each well. At predetermined time intervals, the membrane was removed from the
154
well and 20 µL of S. aureus bacterial suspension (about 107 cells mL-1) was added with
155
subsequent incubation in a dark shaker at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 24 h to test the antibacterial
156
activity of solution phase (which had prior exposure to the membrane, see further details in SI
157
Figure S1). In addition, antibacterial activity of these pre-soaked membrane coupons was also 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 30
158
assessed by re-immersing the samples in the solution containing 2 mL of nutrient broth and
159
20 µL of bacterial suspension, which was then incubated under the same conditions as
160
described above (SI Figure S1). The antibacterial efficiencies (Ea, %) of the solution phase
161
and the pre-soaked membrane coupons were calculated as follows:
162
E a (%) =
∆OD MP − ∆ODt × 100 ∆OD MP
(3)
163
where ∆ODMP represents the increase of OD600 value in the blank culture solution in which
164
MP sample (without QAC, i.e., the control) was used, following 24 h of incubation. ∆ODt
165
indicates the increase of OD600 value in the culture solution either (i) upon contact with MQ
166
for t or (ii) containing MQ coupon that has been pre-soaked in nutrient broth for t, following
167
24 h of incubation.
168
The production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by bacteria upon
169
exposure to aqueous QAC and QAC blended membrane (MQ) was measured by a ROS
170
detection kit containing H2DCF-DA (Life Technologies, U.S.).34 The specific procedure is
171
shown in SI Section S1.
172
Antibacterial activity of pre-fouled MQ membranes was further evaluated, using sodium
173
alginate and S. aureus as the model foulants representing organic and biological contaminants,
174
respectively (see the determination procedures in SI Figure S1). After UV irradiation and
175
immersion in sterile water for 4 h to remove any unbound QAC, MQ coupons of 1.1 cm2
176
were subject to the deposition of 0.1 g L-1 alginate solution (5 mL) or 2×108 S. aureus cells
177
mL-1 (1 mL) bacterial suspension through dead-end filtration, respectively. Confocal laser
178
scanning microscopy (CLSM, Nikon A1, Japan) was employed to characterize the thickness
179
of cake layers.35 The viable and dead cells were stained using LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
180
Bacterial Viability Kits (Molecular Probes, Inc.) as described by He et al.36 Concavalin A
181
(Con A, Molecular Probes, Inc.), a kind of fluorescent markers, was used to label
182
α-glucopyranose polysaccharides.37 Ea of the MQ covered with different cake layers was then
183
evaluated and calculated according to Eq. 3.
184
Long-term Anti-biofouling Performance. The long-term performance of MP and MQ
185
were evaluated in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) with an effective volume of 5 L.
186
Details about this reactor can be found in SI Section S2 and Figure S2. Prior to the
187
experiments, the MQ membrane was subject to 4-h soaking in sterile DI water to remove any
188
unbound QAC. At the end of each operation cycle, cake layers were carefully scraped off
189
from the fouled membrane modules and mixed well with DI water before analysis.38 The
190
amount of solids deposited on membrane surface was determined according to the protocol
191
reported in literature by quantifying the suspended solids on membranes of a certain surface
192
area.39 Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was also carried out to
193
characterize the total amount of bacteria on the membrane surface according to the method
194
reported by Zhang et al.40. The primers for amplification of 16S rRNA genes were EUB338F
195
(5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) and EUB518R (5’-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3’).
196
Further information on amplification procedure can be found in SI Section S3. Visualization
197
of the spatial structures of the cake layers was performed by CLSM using LIVE/DEAD®
198
BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kits as probing stains.
199 200 201
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Intrinsic Membrane Properties. Figure 1A presents the typical XPS spectra of MP, MQ 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
202
and pure QAC, respectively. Strong signals at 685 eV in the spectra of MP and MQ were
203
associated with F 1s orbital, which is solely contributed by PVDF. Elemental balance analysis
204
showed that PVDF accounted for 76.7 and 72.4 wt.% of the surface compositions of MP and
205
MQ, respectively. Presence of other elements including carbon (C 1s), nitrogen (N 1s) and
206
oxygen (O 1s) was generally expected due to their omnipresence in solvents, additives and
207
the QAC biocide. In view of the chemical composition of casting solution (SI Table S1), the
208
XPS spectrum of the QAC-loaded membrane MQ can be considered as the superposition of
209
those of MP and QAC. Based on XPS data (see SI Table S2), the mass concentration of QAC
210
at the surface of MQ was approximately 5.4 wt.% (see detailed calculation in SI Section S4).
211
The corresponding QAC to PVDF mass ratio of 0.075 was 3-fold of the bulk ratio of 0.025
212
(SI Section S4). The major difference in the surface and bulk composition suggests that
213
surface segregation of QAC occurred, possibly because the hydrophobic alkyl chains of
214
amphiphilic quaternary ammonium compounds were capable of driving surface-concentrating
215
via segregation during the casting process (exposure to air) and the hydrophilic head induced
216
segregation during the following phase separation process.41
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
N+
F 1s Cl-
MQ
C 1s N 1s O 1s
MP QAC
0
100
200 400 600 Binding energy (eV)
800
50
(B)
40 30 20 10 0 0
(C)
MP
MQ
(D)
-3 Zeta potential (mV)
80 Contact angle (° )
2
Normalized XPS spetra
(A)
Water permeability (L/m h kPa)
Page 11 of 30
60 40 20 0
MP
-6 -9 -12 -15 -18
MQ
MP
MQ
217 218
Figure 1. Blending of QAC into the PVDF membrane and its influence on membrane properties. (A) XPS
219
spectra for pristine membrane (MP, black line), QAC blended membrane (MQ, red line) and pure QAC
220
(blue line); (B) Water permeability (n = 3); (C) Contact angle of DI water on membranes (n = 7); (D) Zeta
221
potential (n = 3). The inset figure on Figure 1A is the chemical structure of DDBAC.
222 223
QAC blending did not significantly affect the intrinsic membrane permeability (37.2 ±
224
1.8 and 34.1 ± 3.2 L m-2 h-1 kPa-1 for MP and MQ, respectively, see Figure 1B). Besides, the
225
membrane hydrophilicity was slightly decreased (Figure 1C), with the measured contact
226
angles of 71.0 ± 1.1 and 79.3 ± 2.8 for MP and MQ, respectively. The increase of
227
hydrophobicity of the membrane surface may be attributed to the alkyl chains of QAC and
228
the increase of roughness for MQ (Figure S3A), consistent with the surface-concentrating of
229
QAC based on the XPS analysis. Figure 1D shows that membrane surface charge was
230
significantly altered by QAC blending: -14.5 ± 0.8 mV for MP and -5.7 ± 3.2 mV for MQ at
o
o
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
231
pH = 7.4. The less negative charge of MQ may be attributed to the coverage of the membrane
232
surface by the positively charged QAC.42-44 With the introduction of QAC, porosity and pore
233
size of MQ was also increased compared to those of MP (Figure S3B and Figure S3C).
234
Antibacterial Activity of QAC Blended Membrane. Model bacteria strains of E. coli
235
(Gram-negative) and S. aureus (Gram-positive) were chosen to test the membrane
236
antibacterial activity by loading membrane coupons (MQ or MP) into their culture solutions.
237
The OD600 values during 24-h incubation are shown in SI Figure S4. Specifically, cell
238
proliferation modeling was conducted for the exponential growth phases45 (i.e., 3 to 24 h for
239
E. coli and 6 to 24 h for S. aureus), and the results indicate that specific growth rates (µ) of E.
240
coli and S. aureus subject to MQ were retarded dramatically (Figures 2A and D), leading to a
241
substantial increase in doubling time (τd, SI Figure S5). In contrast, experimental results
242
showed no obvious difference between the culture solutions with and without MP (denoted as
243
NM in Figure 2) in terms of the bacterial growth rates. This implied that the presence of QAC
244
in MQ should be the primary reason causing inhibition of microbial growth. Consistent to the
245
OD600 measurements, SEM micrographs (Figures 2B, C, E and F) show significantly reduced
246
bacteria attachment/growth on MQ in comparison to MP after exposing the membranes to E.
247
coli or S. aureus bacterial culture suspensions for 24 h. The antibacterial and cell attachment
248
experiments clearly demonstrated that the QAC blended membrane, MQ, presented an
249
effective antibacterial activity for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, which is
250
consistent with the observations in using QAC for material surface coatings reported by
251
previous literature.46-48
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 30
Page 13 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
252 253
Figure 2. Antibacterial activity of MP and MQ. (A) µ of E. coli upon contact with MP and MQ [with
254
NM (no membrane) as a control]; SEM images of the surfaces of (B) MP and (C) MQ following the
255
exposure to E. coli for 24 h; (D) µ of S. aureus upon contact with MP and MQ [with NM as a control];
256
SEM images of the surfaces of (E) MP and (F) MQ following the exposure to S. aureus for 24 h. The white
257
bars in Figures 2B, C, E and F indicate the length of 10 µm. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant
258
difference between MP and MQ (p < 0.01).
259 260
Antibacterial tests were further performed for pre-soaked MQ coupons and the
261
supernatant (with pre-determined soaking of MQ) to better understand the detailed
262
antibacterial mechanisms (see Figure 3A). It can be observed that Ea for supernatant
263
increased in the first 4 h, indicating that release-killing was at least partially responsible for
264
the antibacterial effect. Nevertheless, Ea of the supernatant reached a stable value after 4 h.
265
On the other hand, the pre-soaked MQ membrane remained highly effective in suppressing 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
266
bacteria growth over the entire experimental course of 8 days. The Ea value for MQ
267
membrane was rather stable after the first 2 h, revealing that its antibacterial efficiency could
268
last for a long duration (8 d in the batch test and over 110 d in a membrane bioreactor (MBR)
269
as described in the following MBR test). 120
(A)
Membrane Supernatant
100 Ea (%)
80 60 40 20
3
ROS response value (×10 )
0
8.0
0.5h1h 2h 4h 8h 1d 2d 4d 8d Time Free Immobilized
(B)
6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
100
0
20 40 Time (min)
60
(C)
Ea (%)
80 60 40 20 0 270
Alginate
S. aureus
271
Figure 3. Antibacterial efficiencies (Ea) of (A) MQs and the supernatant where MQs were soaked as a
272
function of elapsed time, (B) Intracellular ROS production of S. aureus upon exposure to free and
273
immobilized QAC, and (C) MQs covered with abiotic alginate and S. aureus fouling layers. In Figures 3B
274
and 3C, MQ coupons were firstly rinsed in sterile DI water for over 4 h to remove any unbound QAC. The
275
blue dashed line in Figure 3C indicates the maximum Ea (about 90%) (after removal of unbound QAC). 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 30
Page 15 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
276 277
Antibacterial Mechanisms. To further elucidate the mechanisms involved, the
278
production of intracellular ROS was determined for S. aureus upon exposure to free and
279
immobilized QAC (pre-soaked MQ membrane) (see Figure 3B and detailed test procedure in
280
SI Section S1). For the free QAC, significant amount of ROS was detected. Furthermore, it
281
showed an increase rate of 73.8 unit min-1 with the increase of exposure time. It suggests that
282
the QAC in the solution phase may interact with the cells, inducing the generation of ROS
283
that can cause acute disruption to bacteria. This observation is consistent with the results in
284
Figure 3A and is also supported by existing literature that the presence of benzalkonium
285
chloride (a kind of QAC) can induce enhanced ROS production for Chang conjunctival
286
cells49. For S. aureus exposed to the pre-soaked MQ, the production of ROS was not detected
287
(Figure 3B) despite of their persistent high antibacterial effectiveness. This observation may
288
suggest that contact-killing is a prevailing mode of action for the pre-soaked MQ membranes.
289
According to previous studies, QAC has a strong affinity with polymeric matrix and could be
290
effectively immobilized at the membrane surface.41,50,51 The immobilized QAC and its
291
associated contact-killing mechanism ensure a long-term effectiveness against biofouling.
292
One crucial drawback of contact-killing mode is that the antibacterial action may be
293
restricted to the membrane surface. Its effectiveness can be dramatically decreased when the
294
membrane surface is covered with foulants.22 Consequently, we investigated the antibacterial
295
mechanisms in the vicinity of pre-fouled MQ surface by depositing two model foulants on
296
membrane surfaces: abiotic alginate and S. aureus (MQ was pre-soaked for 4 h to remove
297
unbound QAC based on Figure 3A before the pre-fouling process, see Figure S1). Based on
298
the measurements using CLSM (SI Figure S6 and Figure S7), the thickness of both model 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
299
cake layers was about 30 µm, providing a sufficient coverage of the alkyl chains of the QAC.
300
Ea values of the covered membranes are shown in Figure 3C. It is evident that the
301
antibacterial activity of MQ was decreased significantly due to the surface fouling of abiotic
302
alginate and the residual Ea was only 13.8% (i.e., a loss of 86.2%). In contrast,
303
biofilm-covered MQ exhibited a persistent antibacterial activity against the microorganism.
304
The proposed mechanism of MQ’s antibacterial activity is shown in Figure 4. According to
305
previous studies, QAC involving disruption of the integrity of the cell wall are also capable of
306
causing induced feedback such as inhibition of respiratory enzymes and dissipation of the
307
proton motive force, which is likely to trigger SOS response via cell regulation or
308
signaling.52,53 The hypothesis of the interaction between the affected microorganisms at
309
membrane surfaces and those in the vicinity resulting in consequent inhibition of population
310
growth and colonization (as illustrated in Figure 4) is not unwarranted. For example, it has
311
been reported that bacteria can use contact-dependent signaling, notably to limit their
312
growth.54 Another relevant evidence for the antibacterial activity in the vicinity of membrane
313
surface is the built-in bacterial programmed cell death pathway mediated by quorum sensing
314
peptides using toxin-antitoxin system such as mazEF.55,56 In order to further confirm the
315
antimicrobial mechanisms involved, long-term experiments in a membrane bioreactor (MBR)
316
were then carried out to assess the effectiveness of MQ against microorganisms as a function
317
of the development of cake layers.
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 30
Page 17 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
318 319
Figure 4. A schematic representation of the antibacterial behaviours at MQ membrane surface and in the
320
vicinity. SOS response as a result of contact with immobilized QAC is especially presented in the inset.
321 322
Long-term anti-biofouling performance in MBR. Prior to the experiment, the MQ
323
membrane was pre-soaked in sterile DI water for 4 h (based on the result shown in Figure 3A)
324
to remove unbound QAC. Figure 5A shows the variations of trans-membrane pressure (TMP)
325
of MQ as a function of MBR operation time, with MP examined for as a control. The two
326
kinds of membranes were operated in the same bioreactor to ensure that they encountered the
327
same operating conditions and mixed liquor. In line with the results of batch experiments,
328
MQ exhibited a much better performance against bio-fouling. Notably, the TMP increase rate
329
of MQ was milder when the biofilm thickness was less than ~45 µm (blue dashed line in
330
Figure 5A57) compared to that of MP. However, similar slopes of TMP were observed at
331
biofilm thickness of > ~45 µm possibly due to the shielding of QAC by the dead cells.
332
Interestingly, the antimicrobial effectiveness of MQ was restored upon membrane cleaning
333
(0.5 wt.% NaOCl soaking for 2 h), suggesting that surface antimicrobial modification in
334
combination with a carefully designed cleaning strategy can effectively ensure long-term
335
biofouling abatement. Figure 5B indicates the abundances (copies cm-2) of 16S rRNA genes 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
336
in the cake layers of MP and MQ. For qRT-PCR analysis, it has been assumed that the
337
abundance of amplified DNA product should be positively correlated to cell counting.40 As
338
can be seen from Figure 5B, the amount of bacteria was substantially reduced when QAC
339
were blended into the matrix. A similar conclusion can be drawn with regard to the
340
measurement of solids (biomass) of the cake layers of MP and MQ (SI Table S3): i.e., the
341
cake layer on MP surface had significantly greater amount of volatile suspended solids (1.08
342
± 0.36 mg cm-2) compared to that of MQ (0.18 ± 0.02 mg cm-2).
343 344
Figure 5. Long-term experiments revealing the antimicrobial behaviours in an MBR. (A) Variations of
345
TMP for MP and MQ as a function of time; (B) Abundances of 16S rRNA gene in the cake layers of MP
346
and MQ revealed by qRT-PCR; CLSM images of the cake layers of (C) MP and (D) MQ at the end of the
347
4th and 2nd operation cycle, respectively. In Figure 5A, the dashed circles indicate membrane cleaning
348
points, and the blue dashed line represents the cake layer thickness of ~45 µm.57 In Figures 5C and 5D, red
349
color represents dead cells, and green color suggests viable and/or dead cells.
350 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 30
Page 19 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
351
Furthermore, visualization of the bacteria in the vicinity of membrane surface was
352
carried out using CLSM with SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI) to stain all bacteria and
353
dead bacteria respectively.58 As can be seen from Figures 5C and D, most microorganisms in
354
the cake layer of MP were alive with only a few bacteria dead. In contrast, the relative
355
abundance of viable cells in the biofilm of MQ was quite low. Considering the surface
356
roughness of membranes (