Subscriber access provided by Karolinska Institutet, University Library
Letter
Asymmetric Synthesis of Boryl-Functionalized Cyclobutanols Andrew Whyte, Bijan Mirabi, Alexa Torelli, Liher Prieto, Jonathan Bajohr, and Mark Lautens ACS Catal., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03216 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Sep 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on September 6, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Catalysis
Asymmetric Synthesis of Boryl-Functionalized Cyclobutanols Andrew Whyte,† Bijan Mirabi,† Alexa Torelli,† Liher Prieto,†‡ Jonathan Bajohr,† and Mark Lautens†* †Davenport
Research Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada ‡Department of Organic Chemistry II, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48080 Bilbao, Spain ABSTRACT: A diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of boron-containing cyclobutanols is reported. We exploit an enantioselective borylcupration to generate a chiral benzylic copper intermediate that is intercepted with a proximally tethered ketone. The scaffolds contain an all-carbon quaternary center with a modular boronate moiety which allows access to a variety of synthetically valuable functional groups. This work represents an asymmetric approach to monocyclic cyclobutanols and highlights the utility of copper-catalysis in the generation of small-sized rings.
cyclobutanols, borylation, copper-catalysis, cyclization, cyclobutanes Small rings have fascinated organic chemists for decades due to their strain and rigid framework.1 Historically, cyclopropanes have been the most thoroughly investigated due to the variety of methods for their preparation,2 while their four-membered ring counterparts have received considerably less attention.3 In the past decade, interest in cyclobutanes has increased owing to their application in ring-opening reactions4 and potential in medicinal chemistry.5 As a result, numerous asymmetric strategies to synthesize cyclobutanes have been developed including [2+2] cycloadditions6 and ring expansion reactions.7 However, these methods are not often used to form the monocyclic scaffold nor are they applicable to heteroatom substitution.8 Cyclobutanols are prime examples of valuable heteroatomsubstituted four-membered rings. They are prevalent in a variety of natural products9 and have been adopted in ring-opening strategies to reveal γ-metalloketones.10 Despite their value, the enantioselective synthesis of cyclobutanols remains a largely unexplored topic.11 We envisaged a simple asymmetric approach towards highly functionalized cyclobutanols by employing copper-catalysis.
Scheme 1. Copper-catalyzed methods towards boroncontaining four-membered rings a) Ito (2015) O
Cu(I), L
R2
O [Cu]
R2
B2pin2
R2 O[Cu]
R2 OH
Bpin
Bpin
Bpin
(±)
b) Tortosa (2016) R
R
Cu(I), L*
R
B2pin2, MeOH
[Cu]
R
MeOH
Bpin
c) This work O R1 R3 R3
Cu(I), L*
R2
B2pin2, iPrOH
R1
[Cu]
R3
O
R3 R3 Bpin
R2
R1
R
R
H
Bpin
R3
R2 O[Cu] Bpin
R3 iPrOH
R1
R3
R2 OH Bpin
Scheme 1. Copper-catalyzed methods toward borylated cyclobutanes a) diastereoselective borylative cyclization of alkenyl ketones b) enantioselective desymmetrization of cyclobutenes c) enantioselective borylative cyclization of alkenyl ketones
Table 1. Optimization of reaction parameters Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (4 mol%) (S,S)-BDPP (6 mol%)
O R
Ph
R = 4Me-C6H4 1s
B2pin2 (1.5 equiv), NaOtBu (1.5 equiv) iPrOH (2 equiv) MTBE (0.05 M), 16 h, r.t.
PPh2 PPh2
R
Ph OH Bpin
(S,S)-BDPP
2s
entry
variations of standard condition
yielda
erb
1
none
78% (73%)
97:3
2
dppp instead of (S,S)-BDPP
28% (29%)
n.a.
3
dppe instead of (S,S)-BDPP
13%
n.a.
4
DPEphos instead of (S,S)-BDPP
25%
n.a.
5
dppBz instead of (S,S)-BDPP
24%
n.a.
6
(S,S)-DIOP instead of (S,S)-BDPP
81%
70:30
7
(S)-BINAP instead of (S,S)-BDPP
11%
n.d.
8
SL-J001-1 instead of (S,S)-BDPP
34%
n.d.
9
LiOtBu instead of NaOtBu
15%
93.5:6.5
10
KOtBu instead of NaOtBu
70%
95:5
11
THF instead of MTBE
80%
96:4
12
No iPrOH added
19%
98:2
13
MeOH instead of iPrOH
28%
96.5:3.5
14
tBuOH instead of iPrOH
36%
n.d.
aYield
determined by NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard. Yield of isolated product shown in parentheses. bDetermined by chiral HPLC using IA or OD-H column in 4% IPA/hexanes
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 8
Scheme 2. Copper-catalyzed methods towards boron-containing four-membered rings Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (4 mol%) (S,S)-BDPP (6 mol%)
O R1
R2
R1
B2pin2 (1.5 equiv), NaOtBu (1.5 equiv) iPrOH (2 equiv) MTBE (0.05 M), 16 h, r.t.
1a-1ab
PPh2 PPh2
R2 OH Bpin
(S,S)-BDPP
2a-2ab
Scope of ketone substituants
Me OH Bpin
iPr OH Bpin
2a, 83% yield 94:6 er
OH Bpin 2c, 59% yield 95.5:4.5 er
2b, 99% yield 95:5 er
Me
OH Bpin
2g 89% yield 95.5:4.5 er
OH Bpin
Me
2j, 87% yield 96.5:3.5 er
OH Bpin
2h, 89% yield 96.5:3.5 er
OH Bpin
OMe
2k, 87% yield 96.5:3.5 er
2e, 90% yield 96:4 er
F
OH Bpin
2f, 93% yield 95.5:4.5 er
OH Bpin
2d, 88% yield 95.5:4.5 er
OMe
OH Bpin
OH Bpin
OH Bpin
2i, 39% yield 99:1 er
OH Bpin
F
2l, 84% yield 97.5:2.5 er
Me
OH Bpin
CF3
2m, 53% yield 99:1 er
OH Bpin
CN
2o, 27% yield 97:3 er
N
OH Bpin
2p, 82% yield 97:3 er
COOEt
2n, 63% yield 97.5:2.5 er
S OH Bpin
CF3
OH Bpin
2q, 90% yield 96:4 er
2r, 83% yield 95:5 er
Scope of alkenyl substituants
F Me
OH Bpin
Me
2s, 73% yield 97:3 er
MeO
2x, 90% yield 94:6 er
F
2t, 61% yield 97.5:2.5 er
F OH Bpin
OH Bpin
OH Bpin
OH Bpin
F MeO
2u, 63% yield 99:1 er
F3C
2y, 85% yield 95:5 er
OH Bpin 2z, 80% yield 95:5 er
OH Bpin 2v, 68% yield 98.5:1.5 er
Cl
OH Bpin 2aa, 85% yield 95:5 er
Me
OH Bpin 2w, 87% yield 96.5:3.5 er
S
OH Bpin 2ab, 82% yield 93.5:6.5 er
Scheme 2. Reactions performed on 0.2 mmol scale for 16 h. All reported yields are after isolation. All products observed in > 20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude, er determined by chiral HPLC.
Copper-catalysis has evolved into a prominent method to access enantioenriched boron-containing products.12 The significance of this method lies within the versatile nature of the carbon-boron bond, which facilitates simple access to new functionalities.13 These reactions often proceed through an enantioselective 1,2-borylcupration of an olefin, followed by termination with an electrophile.12a Although the introduction of tethered electrophiles presents an efficient cyclization pathway, few asymmetric methods towards small-sized rings have capitalized on this strategy.14 The Ito and Tortosa labs have reported enantioselective routes towards boron-containing cyclopropanes via cyclization15 or desymmetrization.16 However, the analogous chiral cyclobutanes have only been accessed using desymmetrization approaches, which are hampered by intrinsic substrate constraints.17 We set out to employ a γ-δ unsaturated ketone as a simple precursor to perform a borylative cyclization. Ketones and imines have been widely utilized in asymmetric borylative cyclizations,18 however
their applicability towards chiral small-sized ring synthesis remains unexplored. We commenced our studies by employing (S,S)-BDPP as a chiral ligand which we recently identified for the asymmetric borylcupration of 1,1-disubstituted styrenes.19 We found optimal conditions using MTBE as a solvent and isopropanol as an additive which provided the product in 73% yield and 97:3 er (Table 1, Entry 1). Only a single diastereomer was observed in which the alcohol was anti to the boronate moiety. We found that the reaction was highly specific to (S,S)-BDPP as other achiral ligands (Table 1, Entries 2-5) or chiral ligands (Table 1, Entries 68) were ineffecitve for this reaction. Other tert-butoxide bases provided lower yields (Table 1, Entries 9-10), however other ethereal solvents could be employed (Table 1, Entry 11). We found that isopropanol was critical to the reaction’s success, as its removal or the use of other alcohols gave significantly lower yields (Table 1, Entries 12-14).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Catalysis
Following our optimization, we surveyed the influence of ketone substituents (Scheme 2). A methyl ketone provided the cyclobutanol (2a) at a slightly lower yield and enantioselectivity, however, we found the isopropyl ketone delivered the product (2b) in 99% yield, and 95:5 er. We explored saturated cyclic substituents and found cyclohexyl (2c) and cyclopropyl (2d) were well tolerated and provided the product in 95.5:4.5 er. We observed that a phenyl ketone furnished the product (2e) in 90% yield and 96:4 er. Next, we perturbed the electronic nature of the aryl ring and found that electron-donating groups (2f, 2g) gave slightly lower enantioselectivities than their electron-withdrawing counterparts (2h, 2i). In the case of the trifluoromethyl group (2i), we observed 99:1 er, however, we obtained the product in only 39% yield. We found a similar trend in the meta position where electron rich aryl rings (2j, 2k) provided products in slightly lower er than electron poor systems (2l, 2m). To probe functional group compatibility, we examined an ester (2n) and nitrile (2o ) and obtained the products in high enantioselectivity, albeit at diminished yields. We turned our attention to ortho-substituents and found that a methyl group (2p) was well tolerated at 97:3 er. Heterocycles such as thiophene (2q) and indole (2r) were also tolerated in the reaction.
the alkyl tether (Scheme 4). We first examined if a dimethyl substitution pattern could be tolerated and obtained the product (2ac) in 88% yield and 96.5:3.5 er. Building on this strategy, we synthesized the cyclic precursors and obtained the spirocyclic product (2ad) in 60% yield and 96:4 er. We attempted to further elaborate this concept towards the 5-membered spirocyclic product (2ae) containing a valuable aryl chloride and obtained the product in 38% yield and 97:3 er.
Scheme 3. Scope of hexasubstituted products
Scheme 4. All reported yields are after isolation. All products observed in >20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude, er determined by chiral HPLC. See SI for details
Ph R3 R3
R2
1ac-1ae
R3
Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (4 mol%) (S,S)-BDPP (6 mol%)
O
B2pin2 (1.5 equiv), NaOtBu (1.5 equiv) iPrOH (2 equiv) MTBE (0.05 M), 16 h, r.t.
Ph
R3
R2 OH Bpin
PPh2 PPh2
(S,S)-BDPP
2ac-2ae
Scope of alkyl tether Me Me OH Bpin 2ac, 88% yield 96.5:3.5 er
OH Bpin 2ad, 60% yield 96:4 er
OH BpinCl 2ae, 38% yield 97:3 er
Scheme 3. Reactions performed on 0.2 mmol scale for 16 h. All reported yields are after isolation. All products observed in > 20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude, er determined by chiral HPLC.
Next, we examined the effect of different aryl substituents on the styrene moiety (Scheme 3). We observed higher er’s and lower yields when the aryl ring was para-substituted in electrondonating (2s, 2t) and electron-withdrawing (2u) cases. Substrates with chloride and methoxy substituents failed when in the paraposition (see SI for details). Interestingly, we found that the disubstituted aryl ring delivered the product (2v) in 68% yield and 98.5:1.5 er. When substituted at the meta-position, we found a variety of substitution patterns were tolerated without significant changes in yield and er. Both methyl (2w) and methoxy (2x) were tolerated, however we observed a slightly decreased er for product 2x. Electron-withdrawing substituents such as fluoro (2y) and trifluoromethyl (2z) participated in the reaction and furnished products in 95:5 er. A synthetically valuable chloride handle (2aa) could be incorporated at 85% yield and 95:5 er. Finally, we examined heteroaryl substituents using a 2-substituted thiophene and obtained the product (2ab) in 82% yield and 93.5:6.5 er. The analogous five-membered ring substrate was unsuccessful in the reaction (see SI for details). We considered the opportunity to generate 1,1,2,2,4,4hexasubstituted cyclobutane cores by introducing substituents on
Scheme 4. Scale-up procedure and protection of product Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (2 mol%) (S,S)-BDPP (3 mol%)
O Ph
Ph
1e 1.18 g, 5 mmol
Ph
Ph OH OBz
3a 46% yield, 96:4 er
B2pin2 (1.5 equiv) NaOtBu (1.5 equiv) iPrOH (2 equiv) MTBE (0.1 M) 16 h, r.t.
1) NaBO3 THF, H2O 2) BzCl, TEA DMAP, DCM
Ph
Ph
Ph OH Bpin
2e, 1.60 g 88% yield, 96:4 er
Ph OH Bpin
2e
2e
TBSOTf Lutidine DCM, r.t., 2 h
Ph
Ph OTBS Bpin
3b 91% yield, 96:4 er
We aimed to demonstrate the scalability of this protocol by performing the reaction using 5 mmol of the starting material (Scheme 5). We reduced the amount of catalyst, ligand, and solvent used in the reaction and obtained the product in 88% yield with no decline in the enantioselectivity compared to the smallscale trial. Single-crystal x-ray diffraction (Scheme 5) confirmed the absolute and relative stereochemistry. All other products were assigned by analogy. We briefly examined the versatility of the products by performing oxidation followed by protection of the neopentyl alcohol with benzoyl chloride to obtain product 3a in 65% yield. Furthermore, protection of the cyclobutanol using TBSOTf furnished the silylated product, 3b, in 91% yield. Next, we turned our attention to capitalize on the modular nature of the carbon-boron bond. We employed product 3b as a model system to diversify the carbon-boron linkage to form new carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds. Oxidation using perborate furnished product 3c in 76% yield which compliments product 3a, as both differentially protected diols were accessible. Matteson homologation was successful to produce compound 3d in 67% yield. The boronate was readily converted to a new carbon-aryl bond using furan to obtain product 3e in 57% yield. Finally, the boronate could be converted to a synthetically valuable vinyl-moiety in 67% yield. Throughout the derivatizations, we observed no change in er.
Scheme 5. Derivatization of the alkylboronate group
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Ph OTBS OH
Ph
NaBO3
nBuLi, CH2Br2
THF/H2O
THF, -78 oC
Ph
Ph OTBS Bpin
MgBr , I2
THF
O
3d 67% yield, 96:4 er
3b
nBuLi 2-Mefuran NBS
Ph
Ph OTBS
Ph
Bpin
3c 76% yield, 96:4 er Ph OTBS
Page 4 of 8
Ph OTBS
Ph
THF/MeOH
3f 67% yield, 96:4 er
3e 57% yield, 96:4 er
Scheme 5. Reactions performed on 0.2 mmol scale for 16 h. All reported yields are after isolation. All products observed in >20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude, er determined by chiral HPLC.
Scheme
6.
Proposed
catalytic
cycle
and
a) Proposed catalytic cycle
enantio-
and
R OH Bpin
II
I Open
B2pin2
A
Cu
P
RO Bpin
Me P
H
B
LnCu
Ph
H
Bpin
H
O
Me
D
Blocked
H
LnCu OR
R2 OCuLn Bpin
models
b) Proposed quadrant diagram
2
ROH
diastereoselectivity
Blocked
R2
C
R O
III
2
Open
IV Bpin
O
CuL*
O
CuLn Bpin
(S)
Ph
c) Proposed diasteroselective model Ph L*Cu O
L*Cu(Bpin) syn migratory insertion
(S)
Bpin
O
Bpin
O Ph
Stereoinvertive 1,2-addition
(S) (R)
OH Bpin
CuL* Ph L*Cu Bpin
Ph O
Stereoinvertive 1,2-addition
(R) (R)
OH Bpin
Scheme 6. a) Proposed catalytic cycle for the reaction b) Proposed quadrant diagram for enantioinduction c) Proposed model for diastereoselectivity
Based on our results and previous literature,20 a plausible mechanism is shown in Scheme 7a. Initial σ-bond metathesis of A with B2pin2 yields intermediate B. The copper-boryl species then undergoes an enantioselective migratory insertion with the styrene to give the chiral benzylic copper species, C. The alkylcopper species then cyclizes with the tethered ketone to obtain intermediate D. Finally, intermediate D undergoes protodemetallation with an alcohol to furnish the product and recycle the catalyst. In order to further understand the mechanism, we generated a quadrant diagram to predict the enantiomer of the migratory insertion step (Scheme 7b). Our model predicted the Sbenzylic stereocenter inferring a stereoinvertive cyclization process which have been previously reported by Meek,18e,f Buchwald,21 and Shimizu and Kanai.22 We hypothesize the diastereomeric preference is based on reducing steric interaction between the two phenyl groups during the cyclization step.
In conclusion, we have developed a mild method to access boryl-functionalized cyclobutanols in a highly stereocontrolled fashion. The simple substrates unlocked access to complex and congested frameworks containing a wide array of substituents. The products were all observed in excellent diastereoselectivities, and generally excellent enantioselectivities and served as a valuable precursor to a plethora of new molecules. This report represents one of the first methods to access chiral cyclobutanols, which are invaluable in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT The Supporting Information material is available free of charge on the ACS Publications Website. Experimental procedures, characterization data, 1H/13C NMR
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Catalysis
spectra, X-ray structures of 2e, and HPLC spectra for new compounds (PDF) Crystallographic data for 2e (CIF) CCDC 1944262 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing
[email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author * Email:
[email protected] ORCID Andrew Whyte: 0000-0001-7261-4309 Bijan Mirabi: 0000-0002-4852-3439 Mark Lautens: 0000-0002-0179-2914
ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank the University of Toronto, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Alphora/Eurofins, and Kennarshore Inc. for financial support. A.W. thanks the Walter C. Sumner Memorial Fellowship, Province of Ontario (OGS). A.T. and B.M. thank the Province of Ontario (OGS) for funding. L.P. acknowledges the Basque Government (Grupos IT908-16) and UPV/EHU for financial support. We thank Alan Lough (University of Toronto) for X-ray crystallography of 2e. We thank Dr. Darcy Burns and Dr. Jack Sheng (University of Toronto) for their assistance in NMR experiments. We thank A. Yen (University of Toronto) for proofreading.
REFERENCES (1) For reviews of small membered rings see: (a) Pitts, C. R.; Lectka, T. Chemical Synthesis of β-Lactams: Asymmetric Catalysis and Other Recent Advances. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 , 7930–7953. (b) Tanner, D. Chiral Aziridines—Their Synthesis and Use in Stereoselective Transformations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 599–619. (c) Bull, J. A.; Croft, R. A.; Davis, O. A.; Doran, R.; Morgan, K. F. Oxetanes: Recent Advances in Synthesis, Reactivity, and Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 , 12150–12233. (d) Ohno, H. Synthesis and Applications of Vinylaziridines and Ethynylaziridines. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7784–7814. (e) Rotstein, B. H.; Zaretsky, S.; Rai, V.; Yudin, A. K. Small Heterocycles in Multicomponent Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8323–8359. (f) Carreira, E. M.; Fessard, T. C. Four-Membered Ring-Containing Spirocycles: Synthetic Strategies and Opportunities. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8257–8322. (g) Huang, C.-Y. (Dennis); Doyle, A. G. The Chemistry of Transition Metals with Three-Membered Ring Heterocycles. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8153–8198. (h) He, J.; Ling, J.; Chiu, P. Vinyl Epoxides in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8037–8128. (i) Williamson, K. S.; Michaelis, D. J.; Yoon, T. P. Advances in the Chemistry of Oxaziridines. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8016–8036. (j) Callebaut, G.; Meiresonne, T.; De Kimpe, N.; Mangelinckx, S. Synthesis and Reactivity of 2(Carboxymethyl)Aziridine Derivatives. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7954– 8015. (k) Degennaro, L.; Trinchera, P.; Luisi, R. Recent Advances in the Stereoselective Synthesis of Aziridines. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7881– 7929. (2) For reviews on cyclopropanation strategies see: (a) Ebner, C.; Carreira, E. M. Cyclopropanation Strategies in Recent Total Syntheses. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11651–11679. (b) Schneider, T. F.; Kaschel, J.; Werz, D. B. A New Golden Age for Donor-Acceptor Cyclopropanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5504–5523. (c) Chen, D. Y. K.; Pouwer, R. H.; Richard, J.-A. Recent Advances in the Total Synthesis of Cyclopropane-Containing Natural Products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4631-4642. (d) Carson, C. A.; Kerr, M. A. Heterocycles from Cyclopropanes: Applications in Natural Product Synthesis. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2009, 38, 3051-3060. (3) For reviews on cyclobutanes see: (a) Seiser, T.; Saget, T.; Tran, D. N.; Cramer, N. Cyclobutanes in Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7740–7752. (b) Namyslo, J. C.; Kaufmann, D. E. The Application of Cyclobutane Derivatives in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1485–1538. (c) Hoffmann, N. Photochemical Reactions as Key Steps in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1052–1103. (d) Xu, Y.; Conner, M. L.; Brown, M. K. Cyclobutane and Cyclobutene Synthesis: Catalytic Enantioselective [2+2] Cycloadditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11918–11928. (e) Poplata, S.; Tröster, A.; Zou, Y.-Q.; Bach, T. Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Cyclobutanes by Olefin [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9748–9815. (4) (a) Hudlicky, T.; Reed, J. W. From Discovery to Application: 50 Years of the Vinylcyclopropane-Cyclopentene Rearrangement and Its Impact on the Synthesis of Natural Products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4864–4876. (b) Meazza, M.; Guo, H.; Rios, R. Synthetic Applications of Vinyl Cyclopropane Opening. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 2479–2490. (5) (a) Blakemore, D. C.; Bryans, J. S.; Carnell, P.; Carr, C. L.; Chessum, N. E. A.; Field, M. J.; Kinsella, N.; Osborne, S. A.; Warren, A. N.; Williams, S. C. Synthesis and in Vivo Evaluation of Bicyclic Gababutins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 461–464. (b) Nielsen, D. S.; Lohman, R.-J.; Hoang, H. N.; Hill, T. A.; Jones, A.; Lucke, A. J.; Fairlie, D. P. Flexibility versus Rigidity for Orally Bioavailable Cyclic Hexapeptides. ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 2289–2293. (c) Lawson, A. D. G.; MacCoss, M.; Heer, J. P. Importance of Rigidity in Designing Small Molecule Drugs To Tackle Protein–Protein Interactions (PPIs) through Stabilization of Desired Conformers. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4283– 4289. (6) For examples of enantioselective [2+2] cycloadditions see: (a) Daub, M. E.; Jung, H.; Lee, B. J.; Won, J.; Baik, M.-H.; Yoon, T. P. Enantioselective [2+2] Cycloadditions of Cinnamate Esters: Generalizing Lewis Acid Catalysis of Triplet Energy Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9543–9547. (b) Du, J.; Skubi, K. L.; Schultz, D. M.; Yoon, T. P. A Dual-Catalysis Approach to Enantioselective [2 + 2] Photocycloadditions Using Visible Light. Science. 2014, 344, 392–396. (c) Conner, M. L.; Xu, Y.; Brown, M. K. Catalytic Enantioselective Allenoate-Alkene [2 + 2] Cycloadditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3482–3485. (d) Suárez-Pantiga, S.; Hernández-Díaz, C.; Rubio, E.; González, J. M. Intermolecular [2+2] Reaction of NAllenylsulfonamides with Vinylarenes: Enantioselective Gold(I)Catalyzed Synthesis of Cyclobutane Derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11552–11555. (e) Albrecht, Ł.; Dickmeiss, G.; Acosta, F. C.; Rodríguez-Escrich, C.; Davis, R. L.; Jørgensen, K. A. Asymmetric Organocatalytic Formal [2 + 2]-Cycloadditions via Bifunctional H-Bond Directing Dienamine Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2543– 2546. (7) (a) Kleinbeck, F.; Toste, F. D. Gold(I)-Catalyzed Enantioselective Ring Expansion of Allenylcyclopropanols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9178–9179. (b) Panish, R.; Chintala, S. R.; Boruta, D. T.; Fang, Y.; Taylor, M. T.; Fox, J. M. Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyclobutanes via Sequential Rh-Catalyzed Bicyclobutanation/Cu-Catalyzed Homoconjugate Addition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9283–9286. (8) (a) Luparia, M.; Oliveira, M. T.; Audisio, D.; Frébault, F.; Goddard, R.; Maulide, N. Catalytic Asymmetric Diastereodivergent Deracemization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12631–12635. (b) Brimioulle, R.; Bach, T. [2+2] Photocycloaddition of 3-Alkenyloxy-2Cycloalkenones: Enantioselective Lewis Acid Catalysis and Ring Expansion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12921–12924. (c) Brimioulle, R.; Bach, T. Enantioselective Lewis Acid Catalysis of Intramolecular Enone [2+2] Photocycloaddition Reactions. Science. 2013, 342, 840–843. (d) Maturi, M. M.; Bach, T. Enantioselective Catalysis of the Intermolecular [2+2] Photocycloaddition between 2Pyridones and Acetylenedicarboxylates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7661–7664. (e) Talavera, G.; Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.; Carrillo, L. Cooperative Dienamine/Hydrogen-Bonding Catalysis: Enantioselective Formal [2+2] Cycloaddition of Enals with Nitroalkenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4104–4107. (f) Luzung, M. R.; Mauleón, P.; Toste, F. D. Gold(I)-Catalyzed [2 + 2]-Cycloaddition of Allenenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12402–12403. (g) Canales, E.; Corey, E. J. Highly Enantioselective [2+2]-Cycloaddition Reactions Catalyzed by a Chiral Aluminum Bromide Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12686– 12687. (h) González, A. Z.; Benitez, D.; Tkatchouk, E.; Goddard, W. A.;
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Toste, F. D. Phosphoramidite Gold(I)-Catalyzed Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of 3,4-Substituted Pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5500–5507. (i) Ishihara, K.; Fushimi, M. Catalytic Enantioselective [2 + 4] and [2 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions with Propiolamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7532–7533. (j) Müller, C.; Bauer, A.; Maturi, M. M.; Cuquerella, M. C.; Miranda, M. A.; Bach, T. Enantioselective Intramolecular [2 + 2]-Photocycloaddition Reactions of 4-Substituted Quinolones Catalyzed by a Chiral Sensitizer with a Hydrogen-Bonding Motif. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16689–16697. (9) Examples of cyclobutanol natural products see: Wang, C. F.; Liu, J. Q.; Yan, Y. X.; Chen, J. C.; Lu, Y.; Guo, Y. H.; Qiu, M. H. Three New Triterpenoids Containing Four-Membered Ring from the Fruiting Body of Ganoderma Sinense. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1656–1659. (b) Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, A.; Xiong, Y.; Liu, L.; Lou, H. Highly Rigid LabdaneType Diterpenoids from a Chinese Liverwort and Light-Driven Structure Diversification. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 3560–3563. (c) Pan, L.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, X.; Peng, S.; Ding, L.; Qiu, S. X. Skeleton-Rearranged Pentacyclic Diterpenoids Possessing a Cyclobutane Ring from Euphorbia w Allichii. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2775–2778. (d) Marrero, J.; Rodríguez, A. D.; Baran, P.; Raptis, R. G. Isolation and Structure of Providencin: A Highly Oxygenated Diterpene Possessing a Unique Bicyclo[12.2.0]Hexadecane Ring System from the Sea Plume Pseudopterogorgia Kallos. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2551–2554. (e) Doroh, B.; Sulikowski, G. A. Progress toward the Total Synthesis of Bielschowskysin: A Stereoselective [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 903–906. (f) Rodríguez Brasco, M. F.; Seldes, A. M.; Palermo, J. A. Paesslerins A and B: Novel Tricyclic Sesquiterpenoids from the Soft Coral Alcyonium p Aessleri. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1415– 1417. (g) Zheng, Y.; Shen, Y. Clavicorolides A and B, Sesquiterpenoids from the Fermentation Products of Edible Fungus Clavicorona Pyxidata. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 109–112. 10) (a) Nishimura, T.; Uemura, S. Palladium-Catalyzed Arylation of Tert -Cyclobutanols with Aryl Bromide via C−C Bond Cleavage: New Approach for the γ-Arylated Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11010–11011. (b) Nishimura, T.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. Oxidative Transformation of Tert -Cyclobutanols by Palladium Catalysis under Oxygen Atmosphere. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1455–1465. (c) Wang, D.; Ren, R.; Zhu, C. Manganese-Promoted Ring-Opening Hydrazination of Cyclobutanols: Synthesis of Alkyl Hydrazines. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 8043–8049. (11) (a) Johnson, T.; Choo, K.-L.; Lautens, M. Rhodium-Catalyzed Arylative Cyclization for the Enantioselective Synthesis of (Trifluoromethyl)Cyclobutanols. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 14194–14197. (b) Ishihara, K.; Nakano, K. Enantioselective [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of Unactivated Alkenes with α-Acyloxyacroleins Catalyzed by Chiral Organoammonium Salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8930–8931. (12) For reviews on copper-catalyzed borylation see: (a) Hemming, D.; Fritzemeier, R.; Westcott, S. A.; Santos, W. L.; Steel, P. G. CopperBoryl Mediated Organic Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7477– 7494. (b) Pulis, A. P.; Yeung, K.; Procter, D. J. Enantioselective Copper Catalysed, Direct Functionalisation of Allenes via Allyl Copper Intermediates. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 5240–5247. (c) Semba, K.; Fujihara, T.; Terao, J.; Tsuji, Y. Copper-Catalyzed Borylative Transformations of Non-Polar Carbon–Carbon Unsaturated Compounds Employing Borylcopper as an Active Catalyst Species. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 2183– 2197. (13) (a) Hall, D. G. Boronic Acids; Hall, D. G., Ed.; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. (b) Neeve, E. C.; Geier, S. J.; Mkhalid, I. A. I.; Westcott, S. A.; Marder, T. B. Diboron(4) Compounds: From Structural Curiosity to Synthetic Workhorse. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9091–9161. (14) (a) Yamamoto, E.; Kojima, R.; Kubota, K.; Ito, H. Copper(I)Catalyzed Diastereoselective Borylative Exo-Cyclization of Alkenyl Aryl Ketones. Synlett 2015, 27, 272–276. (b) Amenós, L.; Trulli, L.; Nóvoa, L.; Parra, A.; Tortosa, M. Stereospecific Synthesis of αHydroxy-Cyclopropylboronates from Allylic Epoxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3188–3192. (c) Ozawa, Y.; Iwamoto, H.; Ito, H. Copper-Catalysed Regio- and Diastereoselective Intramolecular Alkylboration of Terminal Allenes via Allylcopper Isomerization. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4991–4994. (c) Ito, H.; Toyoda, T.; Sawamura, M. Stereospecific Synthesis of Cyclobutylboronates through Copper(I)Catalyzed Reaction of Homoallylic Sulfonates and a Diboron Derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5990–5992. (d) Kubota, K.; Yamamoto, E.; Ito, H. Copper(I)-Catalyzed Borylative Exo -Cyclization of Alkenyl
Halides Containing Unactivated Double Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2635–2640. (15) Zhong, C.; Kunii, S.; Kosaka, Y.; Sawamura, M.; Ito, H. Enantioselective Synthesis of Trans -Aryl- and -Heteroaryl-Substituted Cyclopropylboronates by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Reactions of Allylic Phosphates with a Diboron Derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11440–11442. (16) Parra, A.; Amenós, L.; Guisán-Ceinos, M.; López, A.; García Ruano, J. L.; Tortosa, M. Copper-Catalyzed Diastereo- and Enantioselective Desymmetrization of Cyclopropenes: Synthesis of Cyclopropylboronates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15833–15836. (17) Guisán-Ceinos, M.; Parra, A.; Martín-Heras, V.; Tortosa, M. Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyclobutylboronates via a CopperCatalyzed Desymmetrization Approach. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6969–6972. (18) Examples of borylative cyclization using carbonyl-based electrophiles: (a) Zhang, G.; Cang, A.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, T.; Zhang, Q. Copper-Catalyzed Diastereo- and Enantioselective Borylative Cyclization: Synthesis of Enantioenriched 2,3-Disubstituted Indolines. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1798–1801. (b) Li, D.; Kim, J.; Yang, J. W.; Yun, J. Copper-Catalyzed Asymmetric Synthesis of Borylated Cis -Disubstituted Indolines. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 2365–2368. (c) Burns, A. R.; Solana González, J.; Lam, H. W. Enantioselective Copper(I)-Catalyzed Borylative Aldol Cyclizations of Enone Diones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10827–10831. (d) Smith, J. J.; Best, D.; Lam, H. W. Copper-Catalyzed Borylative Coupling of Vinylazaarenes and N-Boc Imines. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3770–3772. (e) Green, J. C.; Joannou, M. V.; Murray, S. A.; Zanghi, J. M.; Meek, S. J. Enantio- and Diastereoselective Synthesis of Hydroxy Bis(Boronates) via Cu-Catalyzed Tandem Borylation/1,2-Addition. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4441–4445. (f) Zanghi, J. M.; Liu, S.; Meek, S. J. Enantio- and Diastereoselective Synthesis of Functionalized Carbocycles by Cu-Catalyzed Borylative Cyclization of Alkynes with Ketones. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5172-5177 (g) Yeung, K.; Ruscoe, R. E.; Rae, J.; Pulis, A. P.; Procter, D. J. Enantioselective Generation of Adjacent Stereocenters in a Copper-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of Imines, Allenes, and Diboranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11912– 11916. (h) Rae, J.; Yeung, K.; McDouall, J. J. W.; Procter, D. J. CopperCatalyzed Borylative Cross-Coupling of Allenes and Imines: Selective Three-Component Assembly of Branched Homoallyl Amines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1102–1107. (i) Yeung, K.; Talbot, F. J. T.; Howell, G. P.; Pulis, A. P.; Procter, D. J. Copper-Catalyzed Borylative Multicomponent Synthesis of Quaternary α-Amino Esters. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1655–1661. (j) Meng, F.; Haeffner, F.; Hoveyda, A. H. Diastereo- and Enantioselective Reactions of Bis(Pinacolato)Diboron, 1,3-Enynes, and Aldehydes Catalyzed by an Easily Accessible Bisphosphine–Cu Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11304–11307. (k) Meng, F.; Jang, H.; Jung, B.; Hoveyda, A. H. Cu-Catalyzed Chemoselective Preparation of 2-(Pinacolato)Boron-Substituted Allylcopper Complexes and Their In Situ Site-, Diastereo-, and Enantioselective Additions to Aldehydes and Ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5046–5051. (19) Whyte, A.; Burton, K. I.; Zhang, J.; Lautens, M. Enantioselective Intramolecular Copper-Catalyzed Borylacylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13927–13930. (20) (a) Dang, L.; Lin, Z.; Marder, T. B. DFT Studies on the Borylation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds Catalyzed by Phosphine Copper(I) Boryl Complexes and Observations on the Interconversions between O- and C-Bound Enolates of Cu, B, and Si. Organometallics 2008, 27, 4443–4454. (b) Ito, H.; Miya, T.; Sawamura, M. Practical Procedure for Copper(I)-Catalyzed Allylic Boryl Substitution with Stoichiometric Alkoxide Base. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 3423–3427. (c) Semba, K.; Fujihara, T.; Terao, J.; Tsuji, Y. Copper-Catalyzed Borylative Transformations of Non-Polar Carbon–Carbon Unsaturated Compounds Employing Borylcopper as an Active Catalyst Species. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 2183–2197. (21) Yang, Y.; Perry, I. B.; Buchwald, S. L. Copper-Catalyzed Enantioselective Addition of Styrene-Derived Nucleophiles to Imines Enabled by Ligand-Controlled Chemoselective Hydrocupration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9787-9790. (22) Itoh, T.; Kanzaki, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Kanai, M. Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Enantio‐ and Diastereodivergent Borylative Coupling of Styrenes and Imines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8265-8269.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Catalysis
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
R3
O R
Cu (I), L*
1
R3 R3
Page 8 of 8
R
2
B2pin2, base, ROH
R1
R3
R2 OH Bpin
access to highly substituted cyclobutanols highly diastereo- and enantioselective mild reaction conditions
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
29 examples up to 99% yield up to 99:1 er