Bimolecular homolytic substitution with inversion. Stereochemical

Bimolecular Homolytic Substitution with Inversion. A Stereochemical Investigation of an SH2 Reaction. Sir: Bimolecular homolytic substitution reaction...
0 downloads 0 Views 401KB Size
301

We have isolated [3,3] as the perchlorate salt by Ce(1V) oxidation of [2,2] in aqueous perchloric acid. For the [2,3] pentaammine dimer, (NH&Ru(pyz)Ru(NH&j+, Creutz and Taube’ reported an intense band in the near-infrared spectrum and assigned it to charge transfer between metal ions [2,3] + [3,2]*. We have not been able to observe an analogous near-infrared band for the 2,2’-bipyridine [2,31 complex. Only one oxidation wave is observed for the 4,4‘-bipy and BPE bridged complexes (El,2 = 0.84 and 0.82 V, respectively) indicating that the ruthenium atoms are well shielded across the longer bridging ligands. Oxidation of the [2,2] ions at >1.0 V gives n 2 (by

-

[2,2]

2[3,3]

coulometry) showing that both rutheniums are oxidized to the + 3 state. From the electrochemical measurements, K is 1 for the equilibrium

+

WI I3JI = 2[3,31 Equilibration among the three ions should be very rapid, because ruthenium polypyridine complexes are known to exchange electrons rapidly.’ Therefore solutions containing [2,2], [2,3], and [3,3] can be prepared by partial oxidation of [2,2]. We are currently investigating the properties of the intermediate oxidation states of all three systems. The 3:2 and 4 : 3 Ru-pyrazine bridged complexes, (bipy)~C1Ru(pyz)Ru(bipy)2pyzRuCl(bipy)2~ [2,2,21 and (bipy)zCIRu(pyz)Ru(bipy)zpyzRu(bipy)zpyzRuCl(bipy)z6+ [2,2,2,2], can also be oxidized. Two oxidation waves are observed for the 3:2 complex [Ep = 0.96 V (a 2) and Ep = 1.05 V (n l)] and three for the 4 : 3 complex (E,, = 0.96, 1-04, 1.17 V). The oxidation waves apparently correspond to the reactions

-

-

- 2e -e P A 2 1 +[3,2,31 -+[3,3,31

and

- 2e t2,2,2,21

--f

-e

-e

[3,2,2,31 +[3,3,2,31 -+ [3,3,3,31

Acknowledgments are made to the University Research Council of the University of North Carolina and to the National Science Foundation (Grant No. GP17083) for support of this research and for a Science Development Award to the Department. (7) J . C. Solenberger, Ph.D. Thesis, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo., June 1969. (8) National Science Foundation Undergraduate Research Participant, summer, 1970.

S. Ajao Adeyemi, James N. Braddock, Gilbert M. Brown John A. Ferguson, Frank J. Miller: Thomas J. Meyer* Department of Chemistry, Unicersity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Receiwd September 29, I971

Bimolecular Homolytic Substitution with Inversion. A Stereochemical Investigation of an S H 2 Reaction

Sir: Bimolecular homolytic substitution reactions (sH2 reactions) represent one of the most common processes available to free radicals and, as a result, have been the subject of numerous investigations. Few of these investigations, however, have dealt with the particular (1) W. A. Pryor, Chem. Eng. News, 49,34 (June 7 , 1971).

case of radical attack at saturated carbon; hence, the mechanistic scope of sH2 attack at saturated carbon remains a subject of speculation.2 With this background in mind, we have undertaken a mechanistic study of the bimolecular homolytic ring-opening reactions of cyclopropanes. The cyclopropanes represent a particularly informative compound series in that they have been extensively studied with regard to both electrophilic and nucleophilic attack.3 It is our expectation that a comparison of our homolytic results with those obtained for the two polar modes of ring opening will prove to be of considerable theoretical i n t e r e ~ t . ~In this communication we wish to report the results of studies which show that the ring-opening attack of chlorine atoms on 1,l-dichlorocyclopropane proceeds predominately with inversion of configuration, When 1,l-dichlorocyclopropane is subjected to photochlorination at 0” in CC14,two major products are obtained: 1,1,1,3-tetrachloropropane(1) and 1,1,1,3,3pentachloropropane (2). A most logical sequence which may be postulated to explain these products is shown in Scheme I, and is the same as that proposed inScheme I

C12

ci.

+ c1

C1CH2CH2CClz

+

C12

h#

-

4

2c1.

(1)

CiCH2CH2~Ci2 ClCH2CH2CC12

+

(2)

CI.

(3)

1

c1 C1CH2CH2CCl3 4

C12CHCH2CC13

+

HC1

(4)

2

dependently by Applequist, Fanta, and Hendrikson,j and Walling and FredricksB for the photochlorination of various cyclopropane derivatives. It was found that the chlorination of 1,l-dichlorocyclopropane is promoted by free-radical initiators and inhibited by free-radical scavengers. When 1-ml aliquots of a CC14solution, 0.50 M i n molecular chlorine and 3.14 M in 1,l-dichlorocyclopropane,were subjected to irradiation for 35 min at 0-5 ”, yields of 1 and 2 of 36 and 45%, respectively, were afforded.’ In contrast, those aliquots8 which were maintained in the dark at 0” for 24 hr afforded no detectable quantities of 1 or 2 (as determined by glpc analysis for 1 and 2).9 Similarly, those aliquots which were treated with 0.2 ml of HC1-saturated CCll solution and subsequently maintained in the dark at 0” for 24 hr afforded no detectable quantities of 1 or 2 (glpc analysis). In the case of the “dark reactions,” pmr analysis demonstrates that not less than 99 % of the initially present 1,l-di(2) I98%

solvent

CsHiz EtzO CH3CN (C6H127 CH3CN)

stereoisomers rearrange to 38 on illumination only the trans isomer undergoes detectable stereoisomerization to the cis counterpart under the same condition^.^ Further, the product distribution in the photolysis of l a appears t o exhibit strong solvent dependence whereby the proportion of 3 in the photolysate invariably increases with enhanced solvent polarity. Under similar photolysis conditions the stereoisomeric urethanes l b and 2b1° undergo clean geo(5) The compounds shown in 1 were prepared on treatment of trans2,3-diphenylaziridine (A. Weissberger and H. Bach, Chem. Ber., 64, 1095 (1931)) with either cyanogen bromide, ethyl chloroformate, or N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl chloride while those depicted in 2 were synthesized on treatment of cis-2,3-diphenylaziridine (K. Kotera, S . Miyazaki, H. Takahashi, T. Okada, and K. Kitahonoki, Tetrahedron, 24, 3681 (1968)) with the same reagents. (6) l a showed: mp 81-82"; v m K B r 2180 cm-1; Amax (C6H12) 271 (E 549, 265 (868), 258 nm (885); nmr (CDCh) T 2.60 (10 H, singlet), 6.05 (2 H, singlet). 2a showed: mp 115-116"; vcxXBr 2190 cm-1; Amsx (C6H12) 270 (sh) (e 228), 264 (423), 259 (476), 253 nm (402); nmr (CDCla) 7 2.85 (10 H , singlet), 5.72 (2 H , singlet). In addition, these substances gave correct elemental analyses. (7) Each tabulated run is one of several conducted by varying the irradiation time from 5 to 30 min. Brief irradiation proved necessary in order to prevent photodecomposition of 3 which sets in on longer exposure to light. The amount of unreacted aziridine contained in the mixtures listed in Scheme I ranged from 65 to 80 %. In each case the photolysate was analyzed immediately, by nmr, employing both CDCh and benzene-ds as solvents. (8) Alkylidene cyanamide 3 was characterized on the basis of its nmr (CDC13) spectrum (T 1.9-2.2 (2 H, multiplet), 2.5-2.8 (8 H , multiplet), and 5.52 (2 H, singlet)) and through its ready conversion to deoxybenzoin on treatment with moist alumina. (9) I t was pointed out by a referee that the implication that l a can form 3 as a primary photoproduct, without going through 2a, is not demanded by the information collected in Scheme I. While we cannot categorically state that 3 materializes directly from l a we draw attention to the fact that 2a photolyzes exclusively to 3 under the same conditions. When viewed in light of the fact that (a) the photostationary state in the case of the lb-2b and lc-2c pairs consists of 2 (cis) and 1 (trans) in a ratio of ca. 9 :1 (uide infra) and (b) the steady-state concentration of 2a (cis) in the photolysis of l a (trans) amounts to only ca. 8 Z of the total 2a 3), this observation is, we believe, best accommixture (la modated by a scheme whereby initially formed l a is drained irreversibly into 3 at a steady-state concentration which is much too low (< 1 %) for detection by nmr spectroscopy. (10) l b shov,ed: mp 56-57"; vcoKBr 1710 cm-'; A, (C6HIZ) 273 ( 6 427), 266 (807), 260 nm (955); nmr (CDCIs) T 2.66 (10 H , singlet), 6.02 (2 H, quartet), 6.23 (2 H, singlet), 9.50 (3 H, triplet). Zb showed: mp 54-55"; vcoKBr1715 cm-1; Am, (CsH12) 270 (sh) ( e 234), 265 (390), 260 (466), 253 nm (392); nmr (CDCla) T 2.87 (10 H, singlet), 5.78 (2 H, quartet), 6.08 (2 H, singlet), 8.73 (3 H , triplet). In addition, these substances gave correct elemental analyses.

+

+

Communications to the Editor