Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF LOUISIANA
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
Bioavailability enhancement of astilbin in rat through zein-caseinate nanoparticles Dan Zheng, and Qing-Feng Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00018 • Publication Date (Web): 02 May 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 2, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Bioavailability enhancement of astilbin in rat through zein-caseinate
2
nanoparticles
3
Dan Zheng, Qing-Feng Zhang*
4 5 6 7
Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Natural Product and Functional Food, College
8
of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang
9
330045, China
10 11 12
*Corresponding author, Tel & Fax: 86-791-3813863, E-mail:
[email protected] 13
(Q.F. Zhang).
14
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15
ABSTRACT
16
The astilbin encapsulated zein-caseinate nanoparticles were fabricated through
17
antisolvent method. The encapsulation and loading efficiency of astilbin in the
18
nanoparticles were determined by HPLC. The nanoparticles were characterized by
19
particle size, zeta potential, redispersibility, SEM, XRD, FTIR and DSC. Under the
20
optimal formulation of astilbin, zein and sodium caseinate with mass ratio of 1:1:2,
21
the size and zeta potential of the nanoparticles were 152.9 nm and -40.43 mV, while
22
the encapsulation and loading efficiency of astilbin were 80.1% and 21.8%,
23
respectively. The nanoparticles had good redispersibility in water without particle size
24
change after freeze-drying. The nanoparticles showed spherical shape with smooth
25
surface. XRD and DSC analysis showed that astilbin existed in amorphous form in the
26
nanoparticles. The interactions between astilbin and the protein were found, and
27
astilbin was encapsulated in nanoparticles rather than adsorbed. The diffusion of
28
astilbin from nanoparticles was significantly faster than that of astilbin suspensions in
29
both simulated gastric and intestinal fluids. Astilbin was relative stable in simulated
30
intestinal fluids, and the encapsulation in the nanoparticles showed slight stability
31
improvement effect. Pharmacokinetic study showed that the absolute bioavailability
32
of astilbin was improved from 0.32% to 4.40% in rat through nanoparticles
33
fabrication.
34
Keywords: Astilbin; Zein; Nanoparticles; Pharmacokinetics; Bioavailability
35
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 34
Page 3 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
36
INTRODUCTION
37
Astilbin is the rhamnoside of dihydroquercetin. The flavonoid is presented in many
38
plant and plant-based foods with variety bioactivities.1-4 Particularly, the unique
39
selective immunosuppressive activity of astilbin has attracted increasing attention.5-9
40
Pharmacological studies revealed that astilbin could significantly inhibit delayed
41
hypersen-sitivity,5,6 collagen-induced arthritis,7,8 and immune liver injury.9 It has
42
reported that astilbin could selectively inhibit excess cellular immunity without
43
affecting humoral immunity. Its strong immunomodulatory activity shows no obvious
44
side-effects. Other compounds with similar activity has unfound yet. Astilbin may be
45
an attractive candidate for novel immunomodulator development.10 However, astilbin
46
is a poorly soluble compound with solubility of 0.221 g/L in water at 298 K.11 It is
47
also unstable in alkaline solution, and the isomerization and decomposition were
48
found.12 Due to the low solubility and permeability, the oral bioavailability of astilbin
49
is very poor. Wang found that the apparent permeability coefficient of astilbin was
50
less than 1*10-6 cm/s in Caco-2 cell and its oral bioavailability was only 0.066% in
51
rat.13 The study of Lei et al. showed that the oral bioavailability of astilbin was 2.01%
52
in rat.14 Hence, improving the bioavailability of astilbin is critical for its practical
53
application. By developing self micro-emulsifying drug delivery system, the
54
bioavailability of astilbin was enhanced 5.56-fold in beagle dogs.15 He et al. prepared
55
the solid dispersions of astilbin in PVP K30-Tween 80 combined carries.
56
Pharmacokinetic study in beagle dogs showed that the oral bioavailability of astilbin
57
solid dispersions was about 205% of that of astilbin. 16 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 34
58
Zein is the main storage protein of corn with more than 50% of hydrophobic amino
59
acids. Hence, the protein is insoluble in water but has good solubility in 50-95%
60
ethanol-aqueous solution.17 With the decrease of ethanol concentration, zein will lost
61
its solubility and is able to self-assemble into micro- or nanoparticles,17 fiber
62
film.19 The specific structure is depended on the preparation method and conditions,
63
such as pH, zein concentration, shearing rate, etc.17 The unique self-assembly ability
64
of zein to form nanoparticle makes it a promising delivering carrier for nutraceuticals
65
and drugs.20 The internal hydrophobic environment of zein nanoparticles is suitable
66
for encapsulating of hydrophobic compounds. Furthermore, zein is an edible protein
67
with natural biocompatibility and biodegradability, and is generally recognized as safe
68
(GRAS) biomaterial.17 The encapsulation in zein nanoparticles could significantly
69
improve the stability, dispersibility and bioavailability of guest compounds.17,21
70
Penalva et al. fabricated the resveratrol and quercetin loaded zein nanoparticles
71
through desolvation method. The size of nanoparticles was 307 nm with resveratrol
72
loading of 80 μg/mg. The oral bioavailability of resveratrol was enhanced by
73
19.2-fold in rat.22 Similar results were found in quercetin loaded zein nanoparticles.23
74
Zou et al. designed TPGS 1000 emulsified zein nanoparticles to improve the oral
75
bioavailability of daidzin. Pharmacokinetic study showed the Cmax of daidzein in mice
76
plasma as well as the bioavailability were significantly increased.24 Sodium caseinate
77
is the sodium salt of casein, which is the main protein of milk. Sodium caseinate has
78
superb water solubility, and is widely used for emulsifying and thickening functions
79
in food industry. It has reported that sodium caseinate can adsorb on the surface of 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
18
and
Page 5 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
80
zein nanoparticles due to its amphiphilic and charged nature, which can prevent the
81
aggregation of colloids.25 Thus, sodium caseinate can be used as a stabilizer for zein
82
nanoparticles.
83
In the present study, zein-caseinate nanoparticles were fabricated to improve the
84
bioavailability of astilbin. The formulation was optimized through comparing the
85
encapsulation and loading efficiency of astilbin. The nanoparticles were characterized
86
by particle size, zeta potential, redispersibility, scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
87
differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and Fourier
88
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The diffusion profile of astilbin from the
89
nanoparticles in simulated gastric (SGF) and intestinal fluids (SIF) was also studied.
90
Finally, pharmacokinetic study was carried out to confirm the bioavailability
91
enhancement of astilbin in rat.
92
MATERIALS AND METHODS
93
Chemicals. Astilbin (>98%) were purified from Rhizoma Smilacis Glabrae in our
94
laboratory, and was identified by UV, IR, MS, and NMR. HPLC grade acetonitrile
95
and methanol were purchased from Anhui Tedia High Purity Solvents Co., Ltd
96
(Anqin city, Anhui province,China). Zein was obtained from Sigma Co. Ltd (St.
97
Louis, MO, USA). Sodium caseinate, pepsin and pancreatin were purchased from
98
Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Milli-Q water was
99
used throughout the study. All other reagents used were analytical grade.
100
Preparation of astilbin encapsulated zein-caseinate nanoparticles. The
101
nanoparticles were prepared by antisolvent method described elsewhere.17 The mass 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
102
ratio of zein to astilbin in the nanoparticles was varied from 1:1 to 6:1, while the mass
103
ratio of zein to sodium caseinate was maintained at 1:2. Briefly, 100 mg of zein mixed
104
with 100, 50, 25 or 16.7 mg of astilbin were dissolved in 10 ml of 70% ethanol
105
solution, respectively. The mixture was dropped into 30 ml water contains 200 mg of
106
sodium caseinate using an injection syringe under quick magnetic stirring. The
107
dropping rate was about 2 mL/min. After stirring for another 60 min, the
108
nanoparticles suspensions were concentrated to 25 ml by rotary evaporators at 50
109
oC.The
110
large particles and free astilbin. Then, a little part of the suspensions were used for
111
encapsulated astilbin determination, particle size and zeta-potential analysis, and the
112
rest were freeze-dried.
suspensions were subsequently centrifugated at 2000 g for 10 min to remove
113
Particle size, Polydispersity index (PDI) and Zeta-potential analyses. The
114
particle size and zeta-potential of nanoparticles were measured by dynamic light
115
scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). The
116
measurement was replicated three times for each sample.
117
Encapsulation and loading efficiency. The encapsulated astilbin in nanoparticles
118
was determined by HPLC method. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) and loading
119
efficiency (LE) were calculated with the equations:
120
EE=
121
LE=
122
Briefly, the nanoparticles were dissolved in 70% ethanol. After appropriate dilution, a
123
10 μL aliquot of sample was injected in an Agilent 1260 HPLC system (Agilent
𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠(𝑚𝑔) 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑖𝑛 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 (𝑚𝑔)
×100%
𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠(𝑚𝑔) 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠(𝑚𝑔)
×100%
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 34
Page 7 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
124
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The HPLC conditions were the same as we
125
described before.12
126
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The freeze-dried nanoparticles
127
(Ast-Zein1:1) and its redispersion solution were used for morphology characterization
128
by SEM (FEI Quanta 250 FEG, FEI Inc., OR, USA). The redispersion solution was
129
first dropped on a conductive glass and then dried naturally. Before imaging, the
130
samples were coated with a thin layer of gold first.
131
Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis. DSC analysis was carried on a
132
NETZSCH DSC 214 polyma instrument (Netzsch, Germany). About 5 mg of
133
freeze-dried nanoparticles (Ast-Zein1:1) was added to a standard aluminum pan and
134
hermetically sealed. The pan was placed in glass desicator for 24 h to exclude the
135
influence of moisture. An empty sealed aluminum pan was used as control. Samples
136
were heated from 50 to 300 oC at rate of 12 oC/min with a constant purging of dry
137
nitrogen at rate of 50 mL/min. The thermal characteristics of astilbin, physical
138
mixture of zein and sodium caseinate (with mass ratio of 1:2) were also analyzed.
139
X-ray diffractometer (XRD) analysis. XRD patterns of Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles
140
and astilbin were performed on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker,
141
Germany). The instrument was equipped with a copper anode. The working
142
accelerating voltage and tube current were 40 kV, 40 mA, respectively. The pattern
143
was recorded over an angular range from 5o to 60o in continuous mode with a step
144
size of 0.02o and scanning speed of 2o/min.
145
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. FTIR spectroscopy of 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
146
Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles, astilbin and physical mixture of zein and sodium caseinate
147
(with mass ratio of 1:2) were recorded on a Nicolet 5700 FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet,
148
USA) by the KBr method.
149
In vitro diffusion of astilbin from the nanoparticle in simulated gastric (SGF)
150
and intestinal fluids (SIF). SGF (pH 1.2) and SIF (pH 6.8) were prepared in
151
accordance with USP XXII.19. Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles and astilbin were dispersed
152
in 5 ml of SGF or SIF (with enzyme) with astilbin concentration of 3 mg/mL. The
153
solution was put into a dialysis bag (molecular cutoff: 7 kDa) and then placed in
154
beaker containing 500 ml of SGF or SIF (without enzyme) under magnetic stirring at
155
37 oC. At different time intervals, astilbin concentration in the beaker was analyzed by
156
HPLC.
157
Stability of free astilbin and Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles in simulated intestinal
158
fluids (SIF). Astilbin solution was prepared in 60% ethanol with concentration of 1
159
mg/mL. Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles were dispersed in water with astilbin concentration
160
of 1 mg/mL. A 1.0 mL aliquot of the two solutions were mixed with 9 mL of SIF
161
(without enzyme), respectively. The mixture was incubated at 37 oC in waterbath. At
162
different time intervals, the remaining astilbin was determined by HPLC.
163
Pharmacokinetic studies in rats. The animal studies were complied with the
164
guidelines of Jiangxi Agricultural University on animal care. Sprague-Dawley (SD)
165
rats were obtained from Hunan slack Jing Da laboratory animal Co., Ltd (Changsha
166
City, Hunan province, China). The rats were breed in a controlled environment
167
conditions with 12/12 h light/dark cycle and temperature of 23-25 ℃ . Before 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 34
Page 9 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
168
pharmacokinetic study, rats were fasted overnight with access to water. Eighteen rats
169
were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) with mean weight of 300±15 g. For
170
nanoparticles colloidal solution, freeze-dried Ast-Zein1:1 nanoparticles were dispersed
171
in warm water (~40 oC) with astilbin concentration of 6 mg/mL. Similarly, astilbin
172
suspensions were prepared by suspending astilbin powder (pass through 100 mesh,
173
with average size of about 150 μm) in warm water (~40 oC) directly with
174
concentration of 6 mg/mL. Because the solubility of astilbin is only about 0.2 mg/mL,
175
it will precipitate soon. Thus, before oral administration, the suspensions should be
176
shocked intensely. Group I and II were orally administered 1 mL of nanoparticles
177
colloidal solution and astilbin suspensions with dose of 20 mg astilbin/kg body weight,
178
respectively. Group III received intravenous (iv) administration of 0.3 ml astilbin
179
solution (2 mg/mL in 10% ethanol) through caudal vein with dose of 2 mg astilbin/kg
180
body weight. The iv solution was prepared by 5 times dilution of astilbin dissolved in
181
50% ethanol (10 mg/mL) with water. Blood samples (~200 μL) were obtained from
182
tail veins into K2-EDTA pretreated tubes at 0.167, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h after
183
administration. After centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 min, the plasma samples were
184
obtained and stored at −80 °C before analysis.
185
A liquot of 50 μL plasma sample was mixed with 150 μL of methanol containing
186
350 ng/mL rutin (used as internal standard, IS). Then, a 5 μL liquot of acetic acid was
187
added. The mixture was vortexed for 2 min to precipitate endogenous proteins. After
188
centrifugation at 10000 g for 10 min, the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 mL
189
tube and concentrated to about 100 μL on 75 oC waterbath for 12 min. The solution 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
190
was centrifuged at 10000 g for 10 min again, and the supernatant was used for astilbin
191
determination.
192
The astilbin concentration was determined on an Agilent 1260 HPLC system
193
equipped with an autosampler and DAD detector. A symmetry C18 column (4.6 mm
194
× 250 mm, 5.0 μm; Waters, USA) was used. The mobile phase consisted of 24%
195
acetonitrile and 76% water (with 0.1% acetic acid). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min
196
with column temperature of 40 oC and detection wavelength of 291nm (for astilbin)
197
and 355 nm (for rutin). The injection volume was 50 μL and the analysis duration was
198
10 min.
199
Calibration curve was obtained in triplicates by plotting the peak area ratio
200
(astilbin/rutin) against the astilbin concentration (16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 515, 721, 1030,
201
5150, 10300 ng/mL in plasma). The regression equation is Y=2.2604X with linear
202
coefficient of 0.9995, where Y is the peak area ratio and X is the concentration of
203
astilbin in plasma (μg/mL).
204
The pharmacokinetic data were simulated by Drug and Statistics (DAS) software
205
(version 2.0) using a non-compartmental statistical model to calculated the
206
pharmacokinetic parameters, including the maximal serum concentration (Cmax), the
207
time in which Cmax is reached (tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve
208
(AUC), the mean residence time (MRT), the clearance (CL), and the half-life in the
209
terminal phase (t1/2). Furthermore, the absolute bioavailability (Fr, %) of astilbin was
210
calculated by the equation
211
Fr(%) =
AUCoral AUCiv
× 100
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 34
Page 11 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
212
Statistical analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of triplicates.
213
Data analysis and plotting were performed with software of Origin 7.0 (Origin Lab
214
Co., Northampton, MA, USA). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis.
215
Differences were considered significant when P