Bioenergy Generation from Municipal Solid Waste and Glycerin Waste

Aug 2, 2017 - S. Zahedi , J. L. García-Morales, D. Sales, and R. Solera. Department of Environmental Technologies. University of Cadiz. Faculty of Ma...
0 downloads 0 Views 415KB Size
Subscriber access provided by MT SINAI SCH OF MED

Article

Bioenergy generation from municipal solid waste and glycerin waste: Population dynamics Rosario Solera, Diego Sales, Jose Luis Garcia-Morales, and Soraya Zahedi Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01526 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 14, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Bioenergy generation from municipal solid waste and glycerin waste:

2

Population dynamics

3

Zahedi, S*; García-Morales, J.L.; Sales, D.; Solera, R*

4 5 6 7 8 9

Department of Environmental Technologies. University of Cadiz. Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences (CASEM), Pol. Río San Pedro s/n, 11510 Puerto Real (Cádiz), Spain. ([email protected]/[email protected]; [email protected])

10

Abstract

11

This paper studies the microbial community, effluent characteristics and bioenergy

12

generation (hydrogen and methane production) in a two-phase dry-thermophilic (55ºC)

13

anaerobic co-digestion process treating actual municipal solid waste (20 % solid

14

content) and biodiesel waste (glycerin waste, 1 % v/v). Four different hydraulic

15

retention times (from 11.5 d to 4.5 d) and four organic loading rates (from 8.2 g to 21.1

16

g VS/l/d) were studied to identify optimal conditions (maximum values of biogas and

17

microbial activity). Optimal conditions (2.6 ± 0.3 l H2/l/d; 3.4 ± 0.3 l CH4/l/d and 109±

18

9 x 10-13 l CH4/cell/d) were obtained at 5.9 d HRT. Fermentation end products yield

19

propionic acid as the major product in the secondary effluent. The average values of the

20

ratios of Eubacteria:Archaea and Acetogens:hydrolytic-acidogenic bacteria were

21

respectively 83:17 and 30:53 in the first phase (1.5 d HRT) and 76:24 and 39:37 in the

22

second phase (4.4 d HRT).

23 24

Keywords: hydrogen, methane, glycerol, microbial activity, population dynamic.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 31

25

1. Introduction

26

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a widely used process for degrading and stabilizing

27

municipal solid waste (MSW) due to its environmental and economic benefits.

28

According to a recent study 1, electricity generation from biogas in OECD countries

29

grew from 3.7 TWh in 1990 to 78.8 TWh in 2015, making it the third fastest-growing

30

renewable electricity source after wind and solar energy. Due to the advantages of AD,

31

many research studies have sought to optimize the AD of MSW, including the

32

interesting option of the co-digestion process, which increases the load of biodegradable

33

organic matter and produces a higher biogas yield 2–5. Studies on AD of MSW have

34

shown that the C:N ratio of this waste presents average values of 10:1, below the

35

optimum for anaerobic digestion (25:1) 6, while hydrogen production (HP) and methane

36

production (MP) is reduced due to the washout of microorganisms, not to overloading 7–

37

10

38

addition of readily biodegradable organic substances, such as glycerol, a major by-

39

product of biodiesel production, could constitute an ideal strategy 4,11–13. Biodiesel

40

manufacturing worldwide has gained in importance due to several factors: (i) the

41

unavailability of fossil fuels due to demographics and political instability; (ii) modern

42

methods of biodiesel production and new catalyst formulations producing higher

43

biodiesel yields; (iii) the breeding and cultivation of new varieties of oil crops with

44

higher lipid yields; (iv) an increase in the cultivation of inedible oilseed plants on waste

45

land; (v) new engine designs that can use biodiesel and its admixtures as fuel; and (vi)

46

stringent regulations to reduce GHG emissions 14–16. Producing 100 kg of biodiesel

47

yields approximately 10 kg of glycerin waste (GW) as a co-product. Numerous sectors,

48

such as the pharmaceutical, cosmetics, and food processing industries, use refined

. Therefore, an increase in the loading rate employed in the AD process via the

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

49

glycerol as a raw input material. However, the GW generated as a co-product of

50

biodiesel production requires purification before being suitable for use in these

51

industries. The problem is that the high costs of purifying glycerol from impure glycerol

52

has reduced its demand in the market, in addition to the reduction in the cost of

53

petroleum-derived glycerol to less than $20 per barrel 14,17. Thus, GW is often

54

considered a waste stream instead of a co-product 18, which makes its disposal a

55

fundamental environmental concern.

56

Several strategies have been reported in the literature to maximize energy recovery and

57

generate value added products from this type of waste. These options include direct

58

combustion and gasification and AD of waste glycerol to produce biogas (hydrogen or

59

methane), as well as fermentation of glycerol to produce methanol, ethanol, citric acid,

60

1,3- propanediol, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), and the like 13,14,17,19–21. This paper

61

focuses on the joint AD of waste glycerol together with MSW to obtain both hydrogen

62

and methane. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of two-phase dry-

63

thermophilic AD of actual MSW to produce HP and MP 8, as well as that of GW

64

supplementation (1% v/v) to improve the hydrogen production steps in thermophilic-dry

65

dark fermentation of actual MSW in batch mode12. However, no previous studies have

66

been published on the effect of GW addition on two-phase dry-thermophilic anaerobic

67

digestion of MSW under semi-continuous feeding to produce hydrogen and methane or

68

on the effect on the different microbial groups involved in the digestion process.

69

This study aims to: (1) establish the optimal conditions (organic loading rate (OLR) and

70

hydraulic retention time (HRT)) to maximize gas production (GP), including H2 and

71

CH4; and (2) investigate the population dynamics in dry-thermophilic anaerobic co-

72

digestion of MSW and GW (1% v/v). No previous studies have been published in this

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 31

73

respect. With these aims in mind, the effect of four different OLRs (from 8.2 g to 21.1 g

74

VS/l/d) and HRTs (from 11.5 d to 4.5 d) were tested. The effect of the varying operating

75

parameters (HRT or OLR) on soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD), volatile fatty

76

acids (VFA), volatile solids (VS), hydrogen production (HP), methane production (MP),

77

GP, sulphide production (SP), specific HP (SHP), specific MP (SMP), microbial

78

population and microbial activities was studied at laboratory scale. Fluorescent in situ

79

hybridization (FISH) was used to determine the main groups involved in the anaerobic

80

process.

81

2. Methods

82

2.1 Inoculum, substrate and feeding

83

The seed used as the inoculum for the acidogenic and methanogenic reactors was

84

collected from an H2-producing and a CH4-producing reactor, respectively. The VS in

85

the acidogenic and methanogenic inoculums were 49 g/ kg and 13 g/kg, respectively.

86

The tested substrate in the first phase was a mixture of MSW and GW (1 % v/v). The

87

chosen supplementation in this trial was 1% GW, as this concentration had been shown

88

to be highly effective in improving hydrogen production in a previous study12. The

89

MSW and GW used were collected from an industrial trommel (30 mm) located at Las

90

Calandrias MSW treatment plant (composting plant) (Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, Spain)

91

and the Abengoa Bioenergy biofuel company (San Roque, Cádiz-Spain), respectively.

92

The MSW was stored in 25 kg drums at -4ºC to avoid anaerobic degradation by the

93

microorganisms found in the solid waste itself 10. The TS concentration of the feed for

94

the first reactor was adjusted to 20% (which is characteristic of dry AD) by adding tap

95

water. Subsequently, 1% (v/v) GW was added to the feed. The characterization of the

96

substrate used (mixture of MSW and GW) in the tests is shown in Table 1.

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

97

The tested substrate in the second phase was the effluent from the first phase.

98

In the first reactor, NaOH 10 M was added to the substrate when the pH of the effluent

99

fell below 5.3. In the second reactor, the pH was not controlled.

100 101

2.2 Experimental equipment and operating conditions

102

Two laboratory-scale continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) were employed in this

103

study. The first reactor, dedicated to HP (first phase), had a working volume of 5.5 l,

104

while the second reactor (second phase), dedicated to MP, had a working volume of 5 l.

105

Both were heated by recirculating water through a thermostatic jacket. PRECISTERM

106

6000142/6000389 (SELECTA S.A.) baths, with a maximum capacity of 7 litres of

107

water, were used for this purpose. The lids of the stainless steel reactors have a diameter

108

of 200 mm and contain three openings, one for the biogas outlet, a feed inlet and

109

another opening for the stirring system. The bottoms of the reactors have a discharge

110

valve with a 40 mm i.d., used for sampling. The biogas was collected in 40 litre Tedlar

111

(a polyvinyl fluoride plastic polymer) bags measuring 29.8 cm wide and 45.7 cm long.

112

The stirring systems consisted of an IKA EUROSTAR Power Control visc-P4 overhead

113

stirrer coupled to a stainless steel blade with scrapers that allows homogenization of the

114

waste at a speed of 23 rpm. In CSTRs without recycling of solids, the solids retention

115

time (SRT) and HRT were the same.

116

As regards the feeding regime, each reactor was fed once a day (semi-continuous

117

mode).

118

Four different OLRs or runs ranging between 8.2 and 21.1 g VS/l/d were tested. The

119

HRT in the acidogenic phase was 1.5 d (OLR= 63 1 g VS/l/d), as this was the optimal

120

value previously detected in an acidogenic reactor fed once a day 8. Steady-state

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 31

121

conditions lasting for at least three consecutive HRTs were clearly observed for all

122

experimental runs (except for Run IV, as destabilization was observed). The operating

123

conditions are shown in Table 2. The entire experiment lasted 131 d overall. The study

124

was considered concluded when increasing the OLR (decreasing the HRT) resulted in a

125

decrease in MP.

126 127

2.3 Analytical methods

128

The analytical determinations performed in this study can be grouped into two

129

categories: physical-chemical analysis and microbiological analysis.

130

2.3.1 Physical-chemical analysis

131

The following control parameters were determined for the reactors: SCOD, alkalinity,

132

ammonium, VFA and volume and composition of the biogas (H2, CH4, CO2 and H2S).

133

These determinations were performed according to APHA22 and Zahedi 8,12.

134

VS, SCOD and VFA percentage removal rates were calculated according to the

135

following equations:

136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145

(VSsubstrate – VSsecond phase)*100/ VSsubstrate

(1)

(SCODfirst phase – SCOD second phase)*100/SCOD first phase

(2)

(VFA first phase – VFA second phase)*100/ VFA first phase

(3)

The volume of gas produced in the reactor was measured directly using a high-precision Ritter drum-type gas meter TG-01-Series (Wet-Test). Biogas composition was determined by gas chromatography separation (SHIMADZU GC-2010). H2, CH4, CO2, O2 and N2 were analysed by means of a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) employing a Supelco Carboxen 1010 Plot column. A Supelco Supel-Q Plot column and a flame photometric detector (FPD) were used to determine H2S. Samples were taken using a 1 ml Dynatech Gastight gas syringe under the following operating conditions: split = 100;

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

146 147 148 149

constant pressure in the injection port (70 kPa); 2 min at 40 ºC; ramped at 40 ºC/min until 200 ºC; 1.5 min at 200 ºC; detector temperature: 250 ºC; and injector temperature: 200 ºC. Helium was used as carrier gas (266.2 ml/min). Commercial mixtures of H2, CH4, CO2, O2, N2 and H2S (Abelló Linde S.A.) were used to calibrate the system.

150

2.3.2 Microbiological analysis

151

FISH was used to count the microorganisms contained in the substrate and reactors.

152

These determinations were performed according to previous studies by our research

153

group 8,12. The cellular concentration and percentages of Eubacteria, Archaea, butyrate

154

utilizing acetogens (BUA), propionate utilizing acetogens (PUA), hydrogen utilizing

155

methanogens (HUM) and acetate utilizing methanogens (AUM) were obtained by FISH.

156

The total population was calculated as the sum of the relative amounts of Eubacteria

157

and Archaea. Acetogens were calculated as the sum of the relative amounts of PUA and

158

BUA. HAB were calculated as the difference in the relative amounts of Eubacteria and

159

acetogens 8,12.

160

Microbiological analyses were performed in triplicate under steady-state conditions

161

(except at 3 d HRT in the second phase (Run IV); this condition was not analysed

162

because of the observed destabilization).

163

Methanogenic activity was considered to evaluate the effect of biochemical activity on

164

the OLR. This activity was calculated as the ratio of the volume of CH4 generated and

165

the number of Archaea determined inside the reactor by FISH staining 7.

166

3. Results and discussion

167

This section studies the effect of varying the operating parameters (HRT/OLR) on

168

SCOD, VFA, VS, GP and the microbial population in two-phase dry-thermophilic AD

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

169

of MSW and GW. All the values correspond to analytical determinations under steady-

170

state conditions.

Page 8 of 31

171 172

3.1 Process stability

173

pH was the parameter chosen to demonstrate the stability 8,23 of the process (Fig.1). In

174

the first phase, the HRT was maintained at 1.5 d, the pH logically remaining

175

approximately constant throughout the entire experiment (from Run I to Run V),

176

presenting average values of 5.5 ± 0.4. These pH values were optimal for enhanced

177

HAB activity 24,25and it committed to the growth of methanogen and acetogenic

178

bacteria. In the second phase, steady-state operation was observed in Runs I, II and III

179

with average values of 7.4 ± 0.2, 7.5 ± 0.1 and 7.6 ± 0.1, respectively. These values

180

ranged between desirable values of methanogen and acetogenic populations. The

181

sudden decrease in pH in Run IV (3 d HRT or 18.7 g VS/l/d OLR) revealed

182

destabilization of the system, as well as a decrease in MP (Fig.2), methanogenic activity

183

and organic matter removal, as well as an increase in VFA.

184 185

3.2 Leachate quality

186

In the first phase, alkalinity and ammonia remained approximately constant in all the

187

tested runs, with average values of 6 ± 2 g CaCO3/l and 0.9 ± 0.1 g NH3-N/Kg,

188

respectively. These values were in line with a former study 8 employing a similar HRT

189

(1.5 d). Surprisingly, VFA values (18 ± 4 g acetic acid/l) were much higher in the

190

present study (double). The higher amount of acid produced was not due to glycerol

191

addition, however, as the same values were detected in this phase before

192

supplementation with glycerol (data not shown). Furthermore, it has been established

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

193

that the effect of adding GW on hydrogen production from industrial municipal solid

194

waste produces an increase in SCOD, though not in VFA 12. These results (higher VFA

195

values) may be explained by the fact that this reactor was maintained for more than 1

196

year at 1.5 days. Therefore, it is likely that the adequate dynamics (“flexibility”) of the

197

microbial community structure had been established and thus very young and activated

198

HAB had been able to increase their acidogenic activity and hence the VFA produced

199

from dark fermentation of MSW. The dominant fermentation products were butyric acid

200

and acetic acid, ranging from 70-80% and 8-16%, in line with previous studies 9,10,12,26.

201

SCOD values were clearly higher (more than 30%) than those measured before GW

202

addition (data not shown) and in previous studies 8–10. This was due to the fact that 1%

203

GW was added to the substrate 12.

204

In the second phase, alkalinity ranged from 6-11 g CaCO3/l for all tested runs. These

205

values were clearly higher than those obtained when GW was not added (around 4 g

206

CaCO3/l) 8, in line with the higher VFA content (between 4 and 6 g/l). As to VFA

207

consumption under steady-state conditions, this was around 70% (Fig. 3). Butyric acid

208

was the main VFA consumed. Butyric and acetic acid removal rates ranged between 90-

209

99% and 60-92%, respectively. These results are in keeping with others studies on two-

210

phase AD of solid waste 8,26–28. The amounts of propionic acid produced in all the tested

211

runs were high (3-4 g/l), being higher than previous values obtained during AD of

212

MSW when GW was not added 8. However, this fact did not produce an inhibitory

213

effect (pH and MP remained stable). Furthermore, numerous researchers have shown no

214

inhibitory effect of high propionic acid levels on AD of organic matter 29,30. The reason

215

that high values of propionic acid accumulate in the system is twofold. The first reason

216

is related to the high and constant input of readily biodegradable substrate (butyrate and

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 31

217

acetate). Öztürk 31 has shown that propionate is converted to acetate only after butyrate

218

and acetate has completely degraded. In studies carried out by Zahedi 8 (in which no

219

GW was added and high levels of propionic acid were not detected), the soluble OLR in

220

the second phase, employing 6.6 and 4.4 d HRT were 5.5 and 8.2 g SCOD/l/d,

221

respectively, whereas in the present study (in which GW was added to the MSW and

222

high levels of propionic acid were detected), operating at 6.6 and 4.4 d HRT, these

223

values were 10.0 and 14.9 g SCOD/l/d, respectively. The second reason is that

224

fermentation end products from glycerol yield propionic acid as the major product and

225

this acid accumulates in the system 32,33. The non-toxicity of the propionic acid thus

226

generated and the high consumption of butyric acid could indicate that PUA and BUA

227

levels were sufficient to ensure the performance of this anaerobic process under steady-

228

state conditions (except in Run IV, employing a 3 d HRT in the second phase (OLR =

229

18.7 g VS/l/d)). However, higher PUA activity could be desirable to reduce the

230

accumulation of propionic acid in the effluent of the second phase resulting from the

231

addition of GW. In Run IV, VFA accumulated in the second phase, reaching maximum

232

VFA, acetic, propionic and butyric acid values of 20.5 g acetic acid/l, 3.7 g acetic acid/l,

233

4.3 g propionic acid/l and 5.3 g butyric acid/l, respectively. These results are in line with

234

those obtained in the substrate (acidogenic effluent). The accelerated increase in VFA

235

concentration in this digester and the decrease in CH4 content and pH suggest that

236

methanogen inhibition occurred at 22.4 g SCOD/l/d OLR.

237

As regards ammonium, all results were between 775-930 mg NH3-N/kg. These values

238

are lower than those reported by authors as causing inhibition of the dry anaerobic

239

process when treating bio-wastes such as those used in this study 34–37. Moreover, the

240

source of inocula used in the present study were dry-thermophilic anaerobic reactors

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

241

with a medium-high ammonium content, so the inocula are expected to acclimate to

242

medium-high levels of acid, allowing the digesters to operate at certain concentrations

243

of acid without jeopardizing their safety 13.

244

Organic matter removal rates (%) in each steady-state run are shown are shown in Fig.

245

3.

246

Decomposition of VS was in the 79-90% range. Similar values were found in previous

247

studies in which glycerol was not used 8, in keeping with those obtained in the

248

anaerobic digestion of organic waste 38 and the co-digestion of mixtures of

249

slaughterhouse waste with MSW 39 and vegetable market waste with MSW 40.

250

Decomposition of SCOD was in the 65–73% range. These results are in line with those

251

obtained by Ueno 41 (79%) in two-phase thermophilic AD of organic waste for an HRT

252

between 4.3-6.8 d (OLR between 12.4-16.6 g SCOD/l/d). The highest VS and SCOD

253

removal rates were obtained in Run I, corresponding to an 11.5 d HRT (1.5 d in the first

254

phase and 10 d in the second phase). Destabilization in the second phase, at 3 d HRT,

255

resulted in an accumulation of organic matter (organic removal rate lower than