Calcium Carbonate Packed Electrochemical Precipitation Column

4 hours ago - Orcid Connecting Research and Researchers · Portico digital preservation service · ACS Publications. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.; Washing...
0 downloads 0 Views 605KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Nottingham Trent University

Environmental Processes

Calcium Carbonate Packed Electrochemical Precipitation Column: New Concept of Phosphate Removal and Recovery Yang Lei, Santosh Narsing, Michel Saakes, Renata van der Weijden, and Cees J.N. Buisman Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03795 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Aug 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on August 18, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 18

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Calcium Carbonate Packed Electrochemical Precipitation Column: New

2

Concept of Phosphate Removal and Recovery

3

Yang Lei*,†, ‡, Santosh Narsing †, Michel Saakes †, Renata D. van der Weijden *, †, ‡, and Cees J.

4

N. Buisman †, ‡

5

† Wetsus, Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, P.O. Box 1113, 8900CC

6

Leeuwarden, The Netherlands

7

‡ Department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box

8

17, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

9

* Corresponding authors,

10

E-mail: [email protected] (Yang); [email protected] (Renata)

11

ABSTRACT

12

Phosphorus (P) is a vital micro-nutrient element for all life forms. Typically, P can be extracted from

13

phosphate rock. Unfortunately, the phosphate rock is a non-renewable resource with a limited

14

reserve on the earth. High levels of P discharged to water bodies lead to eutrophication. Therefore,

15

P needs to be removed and is preferably recovered as an additional P source. A possible way to

16

achieve this goal is by electrochemically induced phosphate precipitation with coexisting calcium

17

ions. Here, we report a new concept of phosphate removal and recovery, namely a CaCO3 packed

18

electrochemical precipitation column, which achieved improved removal efficiency, shortened

19

hydraulic retention time and substantially enhanced stability, compared with our previous

20

electrochemical system. The concept is based on the introduction of CaCO3 particles, which

21

facilitates calcium phosphate precipitation by buffering the formed H+ at the anode, releasing Ca2+,

22

acting as seeds, and establishing a high pH environment in the bulk solution in addition to the

23

vicinity of the cathode. It was found that the applied current, the CaCO3 particle size, the CaCO3

24

bed height, and the feed rate affect the removal of phosphate. Under optimized conditions

25

(particle size : 50% removal over 125 days with little maintenance. The specific energy consumptions of this

28

system lie between 29 and 61 kWh/Kg P. The experimental results demonstrate the promising

29

potential of the CaCO3 packed electrochemical precipitation column for P removal and recovery

30

from P-containing streams.

31

INTRODUCTION

32

How to feed 10 billion people is one of the main challenges of the 21st century. In any way, the

33

use of phosphorus (P) fertilizer is crucial. P, as an essential element for all living organisms,

34

accounts for 2-4% weight of most dried cells and plays a vital role in fundamental biochemical

35

reactions (i.e., gene expression).1 Typically, one adult consumes 35.2 kg phosphate rock per year.2

36

In general, P fertilizer can be processed from mined phosphate rock. Unfortunately, phosphate

37

rock, as a finite resource, is subject to exhaustion in a few hundred years under the current mining

38

and usage rate.3 On the other hand, the use of P fertilizer and other P products have brought much

39

P to water bodies, leading to a worldwide environmental problem namely eutrophication.4, 5

40

We need to address the P issues being too little as a resource (fertilizer) yet too much as a pollutant

41

(eutrophication) by recycling the P in waste streams.4, 5 Pioneers have recognized the importance

42

of P recycling and developed many approaches for achieving this goal.6, 7 While each approach has

43

its merits and drawbacks, the principle is the same, that is converting P from soluble form to solid

44

phase, which can then be separated from waste streams for potential reuse.

45

In the realm of P recovery, struvite process is a well-developed method.8 This method has the

46

advantage that phosphate (PO4-P) and ammonium (NH4-N) are removed simultaneously. Also, the

47

recovered product can be used as a slow release fertilizer. However, the struvite process needs

48

well-controlled solution conditions,9 which typically means a high phosphate concentration, a Mg:

49

NH4: PO4 molar ratio close to 1:1:1, and pH between 8 and 9.10 As such, due to the low Mg2+

50

concentration relative to PO43− and NH4+ in most nutrient-rich waste streams, the dosing of a Mg

51

source is required.10 The struvite process is used in practice but is not widely adopted.

52

Alternatively, P removal and recovery as calcium phosphate was proposed.11 This process has the

53

advantage that the addition of Ca is usually not necessary as Ca2+ is an abundant ion in most waste

54

streams.12, 13 It is worth mentioning that even when Ca addition is required, the cost of dosing Ca

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 18

Page 3 of 18

Environmental Science & Technology

55

is cheaper than dosing Mg.14, 15 Moreover, calcium phosphate is the key component of mined

56

phosphate rock and therefore, it can be used directly as a raw material for producing P fertilizer in

57

the existing production process.12 Furthermore, calcium phosphate has also recently been shown

58

to be an effective fertilizer when compared to conventional fertilizers and struvite.16

59

Electrochemical processes have gained increasing interest as next-generation wastewater

60

treatment technologies in the last decades.17, 18 On top of wastewater treatment; electrochemical

61

methods also show excellent potential in resource recovery from waste streams.19,

62

coauthors established and validated an electrochemical approach for P removal and recovery.13,

63

21, 22

64

of wastewater, and no need for a solid-liquid separation process.13,

65

membrane-free system. However, the P removal efficiency in this system is low, and the retention

66

time is long. For example, to reach 50% removal efficiency, a run-time of about 24 h at 20 mA

67

(current density of 4.0 A/m2) is needed.23

68

One of the critical reasons for the low removal efficiency and long retention time in this

69

membrane-free electrochemical approach is the recombination of anode produced protons (H+)

70

with cathode generated hydroxide ions (OH−). While the H+-OH− recombination can be avoided by

71

using ion exchange membranes, the introduction of membranes will bring other problems, such

72

as a complex configuration, the fouling of membranes, the associated maintenance effort, and the

73

increased operating cost.

74

Here, in this paper, we propose a simple yet highly efficient approach to overcome direct H+-OH−

75

recombination. In our approach, we fill a column-shaped electrochemical precipitation reactor

76

with calcium carbonate (CaCO3) particles. The CaCO3 particles, which are in contact with/or close

77

to the anode, react with electrochemically produced H+,24 and thus limit the neutralization

78

between H+ and OH−. Additionally, two extra benefits are achieved. Along with the consumption

79

of H+ by CaCO3 particles, Ca2+ ions are released into the bulk solution. Meanwhile, the

80

electrochemically generated OH− ions are accumulated in the bulk solution. As a result, a high pH

81

environment can be established in the bulk solution as well as in the vicinity of the cathode.24

82

Therefore, homogenous precipitation of calcium phosphate may occur in the bulk solution, in

20

Lei and

This approach showed advantages: no need to dose calcium source, no adjustment of the pH

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

21, 22

Moreover, it is a

Environmental Science & Technology

83

addition to its precipitation on the cathode surface. Furthermore, the CaCO3 particles may work

84

as crystallization seeds, allowing calcium phosphate nucleation and growth on their surface at a

85

much lower driving force and induction time.25

86

The goal of this research is to identify the possibility, the efficiency, and the mechanism of the

87

CaCO3 particles packed electrochemical precipitation column towards phosphate removal and

88

recovery. We first looked at the possibility of electrochemically splitting of CaCO3 particles. We

89

then explored the effects of particle size, feed rate, and electrical current on the removal of

90

phosphate in this system. Additionally, we examined the feasibility of this system for treating low

91

P-containing streams and real domestic wastewater and further evaluated the stability of this

92

system for long-term operation. The CaCO3 packed electrochemical precipitation column may

93

offer a robust yet efficient approach towards P removal and recovery from various wastewaters.

94

MATERIALS AND METHODS

95

Materials. Na2HPO4·2H2O, NaOH and Na2SO4 were purchased from VWR chemicals (Belgium).

96

Ca(NO3)2·4H2O was received from Merck (Germany). The CaCO3 particles were supplied by a

97

drinking water company where CaCO3 solids were produced from the water softening process.

98

These particles were fractioned through mesh sives as