Cells Sensing Mechanical Cues: Stiffness Influences the Lifetime of

Subscriber access provided by University of Pennsylvania Libraries

Article

Cells Sensing Mechanical Cues: Stiffness Influences the Lifetime of Cell-Extracellular Matrix Interactions by Affecting the Loading Rate Li Jiang, Zhenglong Sun, Xiaofei Chen, Jing Li, Yue Xu, Yan Zu, Jiliang Hu, Dong Han, and Chun Yang ACS Nano, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03157 • Publication Date (Web): 23 Dec 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 29, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Nano is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Cells Sensing Mechanical Cues: Stiffness Influences the Lifetime of Cell-Extracellular Matrix Interactions by Affecting the Loading Rate Li Jiang1, †, Zhenglong Sun1, 2, †, Xiaofei Chen1,3, Jing Li1, Yue Xu1, Yan Zu1, Jiliang Hu1, Dong Han4,*, Chun Yang1,* 1

Institute of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, School of Aerospace, Tsinghua University,

Beijing, 100084, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +86 10 62788113. 2

Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, China academy of science, Suzhou,

215163, People’s Republic of China. 3

Beijing Institute of Aerospace Systems Engineering, Beijing, 100076, People’s Republic of China

4

National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, 100190, People’s Republic of China.

E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +86 10 62656765; Tel: +86 10 82545568. †

These two authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding authors

Abstract The question of how cells sense substrate mechanical cues has gained increasing attention among biologists. By introducing contour-based data analysis to single-cell force spectroscopy, we identified a loading-rate threshold for the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond beyond which a dramatic increase in bond lifetime was observed. Based on mechanical cues (elasticity or topography), the effective spring constant of substrates k is mapped to the loading rate r under actomyosin pulling speed v, which, in turn, affects the lifetime of the integrin-ligand bond. Additionally, downregulating v with a low-dose blebbistatin treatment promotes the neuronal lineage 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 30

specification of mesenchymal stem cells on osteogenic stiff substrates. Thus, sensing of the rate is central to how cells sense mechanical cues that affect cell-extracellular matrix interactions and stem cell differentiation. Keywords Single molecule force spectroscopy; single cell force spectroscopy; loading rate; integrin; stem cells differentiation; substrate stiffness.

It has become increasingly apparent that every tissue has a characteristic ‘stiffness phenotype.’ All cells in tissues and organs are exposed to extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and are specifically tuned to the stiffness of the particular tissue in which the cells reside.1, 2 ECM stiffness, being a mechanical property, exerts its effects on a variety of cell behaviors such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, organization, and migration and has thus been intensively studied in recent years.3-8 These phenomena suggest that mechanical cues are crucial factors in the design of implantable materials. How do single cells sense their mechanical environment? A simple mechanism may underlie this puzzling problem. Previous reports have demonstrated that ECM stiffness regulates cell functions through its impact on the contraction force of actomyosin fibers, the subcellular allocation of integrin,

and

the

PI3K

pathways.9-11

Modeling

efforts

based

on

minimum

free

energy12/stochastic-elastic modeling frameworks13 have also been devoted to this issue. Despite these progresses, the mechanism of stiffness sensing remains unsolved. Among candidate stiffness sensors, integrins are known to undergo conformational changes in response to mechanical stimuli and are positioned atop the mechanical sensing pathway. Integrins

2


Page 3 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

adhere the cells to the ECM by binding to ECM proteins, e.g., collagen, laminin, fibronectin, vitronectin, etc. We previously demonstrated that soft ECM induces neurogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) cultured on collagen I-coated soft polyacrylamide gels by promoting the caveolae/raft-dependent endocytosis of integrin β1.14 As the rupture of integrin-ligand bonds can trigger caveolin-mediated endocytosis,12, 13 these findings suggest that mechanical cues from the substrate may affect the kinetic properties of integrin-ECM protein complexes. In most substrate stiffness studies, gels are typically coated with collagen I as an ECM mimic. Cell adhesion to collagen I is mostly mediated by three integrin types, namely, α1β1, α2β1, and α11β1,15, 16

of which integrin α2β1 is expressed in stem cells, osteoblastic cells and epithelial cells, and

displays a higher affinity for collagen I than do other integrins.17, 18 The present study therefore focused on the effect of ECM stiffness on the kinetic properties of the integrin α2β1-collagen I bond. As a complex large molecule, collagen I contains multiple binding sites for different types of integrins, as well as other membrane proteins, thus is not appropriate for use in the single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) /single-cell force spectroscopy (SCFS). To rule out unexpected interactions between cells and collagen, we used DGEA, the specific integrin α2β1-binding sequence in collagen I,19 as a model peptide to evaluate integrin α2β1-ligand binding properties Integrin-ligand on thebonds cell surface. typically involve nanoscale interactions, in which the adhesion strength ranges from tens to hundreds of piconewtons. Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based approaches are the most frequently used nanotechnologies for detecting piconewton-level forces in biological systems ranging from microscale to nanoscale and has been widely used to study the kinetic properties of receptor-ligand bonds20-23. By gently conjugating molecules or a cell to the cantilever,

3


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 30

researchers can use AFM as a powerful approach to evaluate the interactions/bonds between transmembrane and ECM proteins on a molecular level or in living cells24, 25. With AFM assays, loading rate, i.e. the changing speed of the force forged on the bond, and the rupture force can be quantitatively evaluated; and the dynamic properties of the bond can thus be approached. By using SMFS/SCFS, we observed that increasing the loading rate of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond on the cell membrane not only promoted the most probable rupture force to increase, but also enhanced bond lifetime. The loading rate of the integrin-ligand bond is determined by the effective spring constant of the integrin-ECM system (k) and the actomyosin pulling speed (v), which are affected by the elasticity/topography of the ECM and myosin II light chain activation, respectively. We thus proposed that cells sense ECM mechanical cues via loading-rate sensing. Consistent with this model, reducing actomyosin pulling in BMMSCs with a low-dose blebbistatin treatment enhanced integrin internalization and led to neurogenic lineage specification on an osteogenic stiff substrate. This study provides novel insights into the mechanism underlying myosin II-dependent elasticity/topographic sensing by cells and offers a new approach to manipulating lineage specification in mesenchymal stem cells. Results Substrate stiffness promotes the rupture force of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond in SMFS To address whether the model peptide recapitulates the activity of the native ECM, we observed the cells adhesion features of DGEA-coated substrates. The cells did not adhere to polyacrylamide gels alone, whereas BMMSCs spread properly on DGEA-coated gels (Figure S1). Because the DGEA peptide is a well-documented integrin α2β1 binding site on collagen I, these results

suggested that the DGEA modification is appropriate for cell culture on compliant substrates.

4


Page 5 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Rupture force is an important indicator of receptor-ligand bond kinetic properties.20, 21, 26, 20, 21, 26 We therefore investigated the rupture force of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond on compliant substrates both in vitro and in vivo using SMFS/SCFS. For in vitro SMFS, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used instead of polyacrylamide gels as a soft/rigid (5.1 ×103 Pa/ 2.72×106 Pa) substrate to avoid strong interfacial interactions and to stabilize the force-distance curves (F-D curves). The system consisted of an AFM tip conjugated to integrin α2β1 via PEG chains and DGEA-modified PDMS substrates, with BSA-modified PDMS serving as a control. Representative F-D curves for integrin α2β1-DGEA/BSA are shown in Figure 1a. The first peak in the F-D curves is assigned to the non-specific interaction between the AFM tip and the PDMS substrate. The second peak, which appears about 20~40 nm away from the first peak, denotes the rupture force of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond because the typical length of a PEG-chain crosslinker is 20~40 nm.27 Based on Poisson statistics, ~ 85% of unbinding events represent the rupture of a single bond28, 29 when the binding probability (e.g., the proportion of curves displaying specific binding events, Figure 1b) is 28.0% ± 3.0%. Histogram analysis of 300~400 observed specific unbinding events demonstrated a log-normal distribution of the rupture force for the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond, in which the peak value of the rupture force was 83 and 119 pN for soft and stiff gels, respectively, at a cantilever retraction speed (CRS) of 1 µm/s (Figure 1c). Integrin dimers can undergo conformational changes upon activation that may have a major on ligand binding and signaling activities.30 According to the results from Miller MW31, integrin α2β1 binds ligands via the I-domain in the α subunit, but switching I-domain from a closed, inactive conformation to an open, active conformation is regulated by the I-like domain of the β subunit. TC-I 15 is a small molecule that docks with the integrin α2β1 I-like domain and can lock

5


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 30

heterodimer into the inactive conformation. To test the influence of integrin conformation on rupture

forces,

we

applied

TC-I

15

to

inhibit

the

activation

of

integrin α2β1.

Integrin α2β1-immobilized AFM tips were incubated for 2 h with 20 nM TC-I 15 (4527, Tocris Bioscience), and SMFS was then performed in 20 nM TC-I 15 buffer. Treatment with TC-I 15 significantly reduced the rupture force of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond from 94.9 to 58.7 pN on a soft PDMS substrate; and from 130 to 77.3 pN on a stiff substrate (Figure S3a). Integrin inhibition also reduce the binding frequency of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond to 17%±2% on soft PDMS; 18%±3% on stiff PDMS, showing a significant effect (p5888 pN/s), while only 67% of the adhesive events on the soft substrate fall into this region (Figure 3e). At the CRS of 10 um/s, 76% and 68% of the adhesive events on stiff and soft substrate fall into the long lifetime region, respectively. This result indicates that stiff substrates induce much longer bond lifetimes and, hence, a much lower possibility of bond disassociation compared with the soft substrate. At the CRS of 1 µm/s, however, none of the adhesive events fall into the long lifetime region, suggesting that when the pulling speed on the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond is low, the bond will not respond to substrate elasticity. By introducing a three springs-piston model (Supporting Information Part 7), we estimated the real pulling speed of actin-myosin on integrin, which is on the same order of magnitude as in living cells, ensuring that the experimental data were collected within the normal physiological range.

12


Page 13 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 3. Analysis of the rupture forces and loading rates of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond at varying cantilever retracting speeds. (a) The distribution of the rupture forces of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond on soft polyacrylamide gel (500Pa) or stiff polyacrylamide gel (105Pa) at CRSs of 1 µm/s, 10 µm/s and 32 µm/s. Approximately 200 F-D curves displaying specific binding events were acquired to draw each histogram. The average of each group in the classical method (b), the scatter plot (c) and the contour (d) of the distribution of the F-D curves in the loading

13


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 30

rate-rupture force coordinate system. The solid lines represent the line fitting. (e) The distribution of the loading rate of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond on soft polyacrylamide gel (500 Pa, orange) or stiff polyacrylamide (105 Pa, green) at a CRS of 32 µm/s. The loading rates were calculated by

r = keff × vc as described previously20, where keff is the effective spring constant derived from each rupture event on the F-D curves (see Supporting Information Part 8) and vc is the CRS.

A loading-rate-sensing model In adhesive cells, the loading rate of the integrin-ligand bond is calculated by multiplying the effective spring constant of the system (k) by the actomyosin pulling speed (v)： r=

df df d ∆ d∆ = × = k× = k ×v dt d ∆ dt dt

where ∆ is the actomyosin pulling distance. The elasticity of the ECM influences the loading rate of integrin-ligand bonds via its impact on the effective spring constant of the system, thereby inducing significant changes in the bond lifetime. To evaluate the impact of substrate elasticity on the loading rate on integrin in adherent cells, we calculated the loading-rate distribution of integrin-ECM protein bonds using actomyosin pulling speeds collected from previous experimental reports (See Supporting Information Part 9). In total, 51% of adhesive events on stiff substrates fall into the long lifetime region (>5888 pN/s), whereas a negligible fraction of adhesive events on soft substrates fall in this region, indicating a dramatic decline in integrin-ECM protein bond lifetime on the cell membrane on neurogenic substrates. Because the disruption of integrin results in caveolin-mediated endocytosis and thus contributes to neurogenic lineage specification, 38, 39 the present results show a cellular mechanism through which the mechanical properties of the ECM are sensed. From the aforementioned results, we propose that cells sense mechanical cues from the ECM

14


Page 15 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

through the loading rate of the integrin-ligand bond. We thus conclude that reducing the pulling speed on this bond may reduce the rupture force as well as the loading rate of the bond and thereby direct stem cells towards neuronal differentiation on stiff substrates. Blebbistatin is a well-documented inhibitor of non-muscle myosin II (NM II) ATPase activity. Upon the formation of stable cell adhesions on the matrix, NM II will move along actin fibers in an ATP-dependent manner, pulling the integrin-ligand bond toward the cell center. Thus, NM IIs exhibit low speed and low contraction when their ATPase activity is downregulated. To test our loading-rate-sensing theory, we then asked whether treating stem cells with a low-dose blebbistatin treatment would reduce the loading rate of the integrin-ligand bond. Consistent with our model, we found that a low-dose blebbistatin treatment (5µM) results in a relatively low loading rate and rupture force on osteogenic stiff substrates (See Supporting Information Part 10). We then used BMMSCs as a model to investigate whether the low-dose blebbistatin treatment can mimic the effect of low substrate elasticity in manipulating stem cell specification. BMMSCs can sense soft polyacrylamide gels (500 Pa) via internalization of activated integrin β1 and be directed towards a neurogenic lineage on soft gels.14 We assayed the internalization of activated integrin β1 and integrin α2, as well as the lineage specification of MSCs on neurogenic (500 Pa) and osteogenic (105 Pa) gels after the low-dose (5µM) blebbistatin treatment. The levels of activated integrin β1 in the whole cell were measured via immunocytochemistry, and the results showed that the treatment markedly enhanced internalization on osteogenic stiff substrates (Figure 4a). Integrin α2 has been found co-localized with activated integrin β1 on the cell membrane without 5µM blebbistatin treatment (Figure S12b), while the 5µM blebbistatin treatment repressed their membrane distributions and leaded to dramatic cytoplasmic distributions (Figure S12).

15


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 30

Immunofluorescence staining for runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx 2), collagen I, Nestin, Neuro-filament light protein (NFL) and microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) further showed that blebbistatin treatment blocked the stiff substrate-induced differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts while promoting neurogenic lineage specification on osteogenic substrate (Figure 4b, c). Further analysis indicated that low-dose blebbistatin treatment resulted in neurogenic phenotypes on stiff substrates that were comparable to those obtained on soft substrates (Figure 5). By siRNA knocking down, we observed that the down regulation of integrin α2 or β1 rather than integrin α1 or α11 repressed the neurogenic lineage specification of BMMSCs on stiff substrate induced by low dose blebbistatin (Figure S13). On the other hand, up regulating the actomyosin pulling speed via stimulating cell contraction by caliculin A, a well documented chemical leading to hyperactivation and contraction of myosin, significantly inhibited fluorescence intensity of NFL, MAP2 and Nestin (Figure S14). These results suggest that regulating the actomyosin pulling speed produce a similar effect on integrin internalization, as well as on stem cell lineage specification, with regulating the effective spring constant of the substrate.

16


Page 17 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 4. Blebbistatin treatment affects activated integrin β1 internalization and BMMSC fate determination on stiff substrates. (a) Typical immunocytochemistry images and statistical analyses of activate integrin β1 expression in BMMSCs cultured on osteogenic stiff substrate (E = 105 Pa) in the presence/ absence (control) of 5 µM blebbistatin (Scale bar: 5µm, DIO: cell membrane marker, DAPI: DNA marker). P value indicates differences between control and 17


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 30

blebbistatin-treated groups (mean ± SEM; n=20). (b-c) BMMSCs were cultured on osteogenic stiff substrate (E = 105 Pa) for 7 days in the presence or absence of 5 µM blebbistatin, followed by staining for Runx2, Collagen I, Nestin and NFL. Data are representative of three experiments (Scale bar: 50µm.) The fluorescence intensities of Runx2, Collagen I, Nestin and NFL were quantified using Image Pro Plus 6.0. P values indicate differences between control and blebbistatin treatment on stiff substrate (mean ± SEM; n=5).

18


Page 19 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Figure 5. Low-dose blebbistatin treatment affects BMMSC fate determination on stiff substrates. BMMSCs were cultured on stiff substrate (E=105Pa) in the presence of 5 µM blebbistatin or on soft substrate (E=500Pa) in the absence of blebbistatin for 7 days. Neuronal differentiation markers, Nestin, NFL and MAP2, were then labeled by fluorescence staining. The fluorescence intensities of Nestin, NFL and MAP2 were quantified using Image Pro Plus 6.0. P values indicate differences between soft and. rigid + blebbistatin (mean ± SEM; n=5). 19


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 30

Discussion The functional role of cytoskeletal proteins in integrin activation has been discussed in several recent studies 42. Our group and others have demonstrated that ECM stiffness regulates cell

function through its impact on the contraction force of actomyosin fibers. 9-11 In the present study, we demonstrated that NM II regulates the dynamic properties of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond. 42 However, a large number of proteins, including myosin, talin, filamin, and alpha-actinin, have been described to directly interact within integrin cytoplasmic domains and regulate the activation of integrin43-47 The influence of other cytoskeletal proteins on the rupture force and the loading rate of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond, as well as the corresponding effects on cell function, need further investigation.

Conclusion Mechanical cues from the substrate have been demonstrated to play key roles in regulating numerous cell functions and protein functions, including cell proliferation, cell migration, and cell differentiation. 40, 41 However, the mechanical sensors responsible for stiffness sensing remain largely unknown. Using an SMFS/SCFS-based approach, we found that increasing the loading rate of the integrin α2β1-ligand bond on the cell membrane not only promoted a larger rupture force but also, and more importantly, dramatically enhanced bond lifetime. Variations in the loading rate (r) are controlled by two factors: the effective spring constant of the integrin-ECM system (k), which represents extracellular mechanical cues such as the elasticity and pore size of the substrate, and the actomyosin pulling speed (v), which corresponds to cell contraction. We have previously demonstrated that the disruption of integrin results in caveolin-mediated

20


Page 21 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

endocytosis and thus contributes to neurogenic lineage specification14. We thus propose that cells sense soft substrate via the loading rate created on the integrin-ligand bond. Based on this assumption, we inferred that reducing the pulling speed on the bond also promote the disruption and endocytosis of integrin, and play an equal role to that of reducing substrate elasticity in inducing neurogenesis differentiation of cells. By manipulating myosin activation, drug treatments such as a low dose of blebbistatin can also manipulate the lineage specification of stem cells, supporting our prediction based on the loading rate-sensing theory. The loading rate-sensing theory provides a unified physical core underlying myosin II-dependent elasticity/topographic sensing by cells (Figure 6). The relationship between rupture force and loading rate in rat osteosarcoma cells on soft/stiff gels shows a similar dual-slope property, indicating that the loading rate sensing mechanism is cell-type independent.

21


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 30

Figure 6. Mechanical cues from the external environment and physiological cues from the cell jointly modulate cell functions. (a) A schematic of the cell-integrin-ECM protein system. (b) Mechanical cues and biological factors affect cell function through the loading rate on the integrin-ECM protein bond. Although substrate mechanical cues are well known to regulate cell function, whether cells sense the stiffness or the pore size of the substrate remains controversial.48, 49 Britta Trappmann and colleagues have challenged the notion that cells sense ECM elasticity by proposing a particular arrangement of collagen beams on the pores on the substrate.7, 48, 50 According to their model, the

22


Page 23 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

deformation of collagen fibers/beams varies according to the pore size of the substrate, and thus the mechanical cues sensed by cells are affected by the pore size of the ECM. In fact, both elasticity and topography, such as pore size and pillar length (Figure 7), affect the effective spring constant of the substrate; thus, both parameters contribute to the loading rate of integrin-ligand bonds. Our results indicate that these mechanical cues regulate cell functions via the same principle.

Figure 7. Myosin II-induced contractility subject to integrin-ECM protein bond on substrates with different effective spring constants and different stiffness, pore sizes, or pillar lengths. To understand the kinetic properties of a specific bond, a linear fit of the average of the measured rupture force and loading rate is frequently performed. However, without careful insight to the trend of the data, fitting can be subtle and misleading. In the present work, we introduced a contour-based dynamic-force spectroscopy analysis to specify the trend in the relationship between the rupture force and the loading rate. With this method, we demonstrated a dual-slope property of the relationship between the rupture force and the loading rate of the integrin-ligand bond in living cells. This new method reveals the dynamic properties of protein-peptide bonds. 23


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 30

Whether the dual-lifetime property of other protein-peptide bonds can be observed using this method remains to be investigated. In addition to substrate mechanical cues, several biological factors have been demonstrated to affect the kinetic properties of integrin-ligand bonds. For example, the types and concentrations of divalent cations can regulate integrin conformation and ligand-binding affinity.51-54 Here, we also found that a high concentration of Mn2+ results in a higher rupture force for the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond (Supporting Information Part 14), which is consistent with the results reported by Agnieszka Ligezowska and colleagues.55 The role of cations in regulating the conformation of integrin and the kinetic properties of integrin-ligand bonds should be addressed in further studies. By using a specific binding peptide of integrin α2β1, DGEA, the present study focused on the role of integrin α2β1 in stiffness sensing by cells. However, other integrin family subunits, such as α1β1

and α11β1, also play key roles in cell adhesion and cell functions. Whether the lifetime of α1β1 or α11β1 integrin-ligand bonds on the cell-matrix interface depend on the loading rate, along with their role in stiffness sensing, merit additional study.

In conclusion, based on SMFS/SCFS and a contour-based analysis of the loading rate and rupture force of the integrin α2β1-DGEA bond, the present study proposed a loading-rate-sensing theory that provides a unified interpretation of the myosin II-dependent sensing of mechanical cues by cells. These results deepen our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of mechanical sensing by cells and offer an approach to manipulate stem cell specification by adjusting myosin activation.

Methods

24


Page 25 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

AFM tips and substrates were functionalized according to previously established protocols20, 25, 27, 56 20, 25, 27, 55

.

Cultured primary BMMSCs were derived from Sprague-Dawley rats. Detailed

information on methods is described in Supporting Information Part 15 Materials and Methods. These include substrate preparation and elasticity identification, AFM tip functionalization, SMFS/SCFS, cell culture, immunocytochemical staining, western blotting and AFM data analysis.

Acknowledgement. We thank Quanmei Sun, Jiantao Feng, Jing Liu, Xiaoli Shi, Hainan Gao (National Center for Nanoscience and Technology) for excellent technical assistance and Chunyang Xiong (Peking University) for discussion. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31170885, 31370018, 31370939 and 31400799) and Tsinghua University (2011Z02175).

Supporting Information available: Cells adhere and spread on DGEA-functionalized substrate, the effect of integrin α2β1 activation on the kinetic property of integrin-DGEA bond, the specificity of integrin α2β1in single cell force spectroscopy, the loading rat sensing model is cell type independent, ‘big data’ analysis of the loading rate and rupture force, rupture force and loading rate analysis on substrate of different stiffness, estimation of pulling speed of actin bundle on the integrin, the effective spring constant estimation on F-D curves, the loading rate distribution of integrin-ECM protein bond in adherent cells, blebbistatin treatment influences the rupture force and loading rate on integrinα2β1-DGEA bond, the distribution of integrin α2 and its co-localization with activated integrin β1, the neurogenic lineage specification of BMMSCs on stiff substrate induced by low dose blebbistatin depended on the integrin α2 or β1, caliculin A repressed the neurogenic lineage specification of BMMSCs on soft substrate, and the addition of Mn2+ increases the rupture force of integrinα2β1-DGEA bond. This material is available free of charge

25


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 30

via the Internet at http:// pubs.acs.org.

References 1.

Discher, D. E.; Janmey, P.; Wang, Y.-l. Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their

Substrate. Science 2005, 310, 1139-1143. 2.

Higuchi, A.; Ling, Q.-D.; Chang, Y.; Hsu, S.-T.; Umezawa, A. Physical Cues of Biomaterials Guide

Stem Cell Differentiation Fate. Chem Rev 2013, 113(5), 3297-3328. 3.

Seiler, C.; Davuluri, G.; Abrams, J.; Byfield, F. J.; Janmey, P. A.; Pack, M. Smooth Muscle Tension

Induces Invasive Remodeling of the Zebrafish Intestine. PLoS Biology 2012, 10, e1001386. 4.

Butcher, D. T.; Alliston, T.; Weaver, V. M. A Tense Situation: Forcing Tumour Progression. Nat Rev

Cancer 2009, 9, 108-122. 5.

Klein, E. A.; Yin, L.; Kothapalli, D.; Castagnino, P.; Byfield, F. J.; Xu, T.; Levental, I.; Hawthorne,

E.; Janmey, P. A.; Assoian, R. K. Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and in vaivo Tissue Stiffening. Current biology 2009, 19, 1511-1518. 6.

Zaman, M. H.; Trapani, L. M.; Sieminski, A. L.; MacKellar, D.; Gong, H.; Kamm, R. D.; Wells, A.;

Lauffenburger, D. A.; Matsudaira, P. Migration of Tumor Cells in 3d Matrices Is Governed by Matrix Stiffness Along with Cell-Matrix Adhesion and Proteolysis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103, 10889-10894. 7.

Engler, A. J.; Sen, S.; Sweeney, H. L.; Discher, D. E. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage

Specification. Cell 2006, 126, 677-689. 8.

Raab, M.; Swift, J.; Dingal, P. D. P.; Shah, P.; Shin, J.-W.; Discher, D. E. Crawling from Soft to Stiff

Matrix Polarizes the Cytoskeleton and Phosphoregulates Myosin-Ii Heavy Chain. J Cell Biol 2012, 199, 669-683. 9.

Shih, Y. R. V.; Tseng, K. F.; Lai, H. Y.; Lin, C. H.; Lee, O. K. Matrix Stiffness Regulation of Integrin

‐Mediated Mechanotransduction During Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J Bone Miner Res 2011, 26, 730-738. 10. Provenzano, P. P.; Inman, D. R.; Eliceiri, K. W.; Keely, P. J. Matrix Density-Induced Mechanoregulation of Breast Cell Phenotype, Signaling and Gene Expression through a Fak–Erk Linkage. Oncogene 2009, 28, 4326-4343. 11. Ezzell, R. M.; Goldmann, W. H.; Wang, N.; Parasharama, N.; Ingber, D. E. Vinculin Promotes Cell Spreading by Mechanically Coupling Integrins to the Cytoskeleton. Exp Cell Res 1997, 231, 14-26. 12. De, R.; Zemel, A.; Safran, S. A. Dynamics of Cell Orientation. Nat. Phys. 2007, 3, 655-659. 13. Gao, H.; Qian, J.; Chen, B. Probing Mechanical Principles of Focal Contacts in Cell–Matrix Adhesion with a Coupled Stochastic–Elastic Modelling Framework. J R Soc Interface 2011, 8, 1217-1232. 14. Du, J.; Chen, X. F.; Liang, X. D.; Zhang, G. Y.; Xu, J.; He, L. R.; Zhan, Q. Y.; Feng, X. Q.; Chien, S.; Yang, C. Integrin Activation and Internalization on Soft Ecm as a Mechanism of Induction of Stem Cell Differentiation by Ecm Elasticity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108, 9466-9471. 15. C Popov, T. R., F Haasters, W C Prall, A Aszodi, D Gullberg, M Schieker, and D Docheva. Integrins

α2β1 and α11β1 Regulate the Survival of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Collagen I. Cell Death Dis 2011, 2(7): e186. 16. Nykvist, P.; Tu, H. M.; Ivaska, J.; Kapyla, J.; Pihlajaniemi, T.; Heino, J. H. Distinct Recognition of Collagen Subtypes by α1β1 and α2β1 Integrins. α2β1 Mediates Cell Adhesion to Type XIII Collagen. J. 26


Page 27 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 8255-8261. 17. Dickeson, S. K.; Mathis, N. L.; Rahman, M.; Bergelson, J. M.; Santoro, S. A. Determinants of Ligand Binding Specificity of the α1β1 and α2β1 integrins. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 32182-32191. 18. Tulla, M.; Pentikainen, O. T.; Viitasalo, T.; Kapyla, J.; Impola, U.; Nykvist, P.; Nissinen, L.; Johnson, M. S.; Heino, J. Selective Binding of Collagen Subtypes by Integrin Alpha I-1, Alpha I-2, and Alpha I-10 Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48206-48212. 19. Yamada, K. M. Adhesive Recognition Sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 12809-12812. 20. Taubenberger, A.; Cisneros, D. A.; Friedrichs, J.; Puech, P.-H.; Muller, D. J.; Franz, C. M. Revealing Early Steps of Α2β1 Integrin-Mediated Adhesion to Collagen Type I by Using Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy. Molecular biology of the cell 2007, 18, 1634-1644. 21. Stephenson, N. L.; Avis, J. M. Direct Observation of Proteolytic Cleavage at the S2 Site Upon Forced Unfolding of the Notch Negative Regulatory Region. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109, E2757-E2765. 22. Carvalho, F. A.; Connell, S.; Miltenberger-Miltenyi, G.; Pereira, S. V.; Tavares, A.; Ariens, R. A. S.; Santos, N. C. Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Molecular Recognition of a Fibrinogen Receptor on Human Erythrocytes. Acs Nano 2010, 4, 4609-4620. 23. He, Y. F.; Lu, M. L.; Cao, J.; Lu, H. P. Manipulating Protein Conformations by Single-Molecule Afm-Fret Nanoscopy. Acs Nano 2012, 6, 1221-1229. 24. Puech, P. H.; Taubenberger, A.; Ulrich, F.; Krieg, M.; Muller, D. J.; Heisenberg, C. P. Measuring Cell Adhesion Forces of Primary Gastrulating Cells from Zebrafish Using Atomic Force Microscopy. J Cell Sci 2005, 118, 4199-4206. 25. Franz, C. M.; Taubenberger, A.; Puech, P.-H.; Muller, D. J. Studying Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion at the Single-Molecule Level Using Afm Force Spectroscopy. Science Signaling 2007, 2007, l5. 26. Puech, P.-H.; Poole, K.; Knebel, D.; Muller, D. J. A New Technical Approach to Quantify Cell–Cell Adhesion Forces by AFM. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106, 637-644. 27. Yu, J. P.; Wang, Q.; Shi, X. L.; Ma, X. Y.; Yang, H. Y.; Chen, Y. G.; Fang, X. H. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Study of Interaction between Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 and Its Receptor in Living Cells. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111, 13619-13625. 28. Tees, D. F.; Waugh, R. E.; Hammer, D. A. A Microcantilever Device to Assess the Effect of Force on the Lifetime of Selectin-Carbohydrate Bonds. Biophys J 2001, 80, 668-682. 29. Benoit, M.; Gabriel, D.; Gerisch, G.; Gaub, H. E. Discrete Interactions in Cell Adhesion Measured by Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2, 313-317. 30. Schlickum, S.; Sennefelder, H.; Friedrich, M.; Harms, G.; Lohse, M. J.; Kilshaw, P.; Schön, M. P. Integrin αE (Cd103) β7 Influences Cellular Shape and Motility in a Ligand-Dependent Fashion. Blood 2008, 112, 619-625. 31. Miller, M. W.; Basra, S.; Kulp, D. W.; Billings, P. C.; Choi, S.; Beavers, M. P.; McCartye, O. J. T.; Zou, Z.; Kahn, M. L.; Bennett, J. S., et al. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Integrin α2β1 That Prevent Pathological Thrombus Formation via an Allosteric Mechanism. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106, 719-724. 32. Chowdhury, F.; Na, S.; Li, D.; Poh, Y. C.; Tanaka, T. S.; Wang, F.; Wang, N. Material Properties of the Cell Dictate Stress-Induced Spreading and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells. Nat Mater 2010, 9, 82-88. 33. Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Dynamic Strength of Molecular Adhesion Bonds. Biophys J 1997, 72,

27


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 30

1541-1555. 34. Bell, G. I. Models for Specific Adhesion of Cells to Cells. Science 1978, 200, 618-627. 35. Chan, C. E. O., D. J. Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates. Science 2008, 322, 1687-1691. 36. Bangasser, B. L., Rosenfeld, S. S. & Odde, D. J. Determinants of Maximal Force Transmission in a Motor-Clutch Model of Cell Traction in a Compliant Microenvironment. Biophys. J. 2013, 105, 581-592. 37. Alberto Elosegui-Artola, E. B., Michael D. Allen, Ion Andreu, Roger Oria,; Raimon Sunyer, J. J. G., John F. Marshall, J. Louise Jones, Xavier Trepat; Roca-Cusachs, a. P. Rigidity Sensing and Adaptation through Regulation of Integrin Types. Nat Mater 2014, 13. 38. del Pozo, M. A.; Balasubramanian, N.; Alderson, N. B.; Kiosses, W. B.; Grande-García, A.; Anderson, R. G.; Schwartz, M. A. Phospho-Caveolin-1 Mediates Integrin-Regulated Membrane Domain Internalization. Nat Cell Biol 2005, 7, 901-908. 39. del Pozo, M. A.; Alderson, N. B.; Kiosses, W. B.; Chiang, H. H.; Anderson, R. G. W.; Schwartz, M. A. Integrins Regulate Rac Targeting by Internalization of Membrane Domains. Science 2004, 303, 839-842. 40. Higuchi, A.; Ling, Q. D.; Chang, Y.; Hsu, S. T.; Umezawa, A. Physical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Stem Cell Differentiation Fate. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3297-3328. 41. Pines, M.; Das, R.; Ellis, S. J.; Morin, A.; Czerniecki, S.; Yuan, L.; Klose, M.; Coombs, D.; Tanentzapf, G. Mechanical Force Regulates Integrin Turnover in Drosophila in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14, 935-943. 42. Vicente-Manzanares, M.; Ma, X.; Adelstein, R. S.; Horwitz, A. R. Non-Muscle Myosin II Takes Centre Stage in Cell Adhesion and Migration. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 2009, 10, 778-790. 43. Stanley, P.; Smith, A.; McDowall, A.; Nicol, A.; Zicha, D.; Hogg, N. Intermediate-Affinity LFA-1 Binds α-Actinin-1 to Control Migration at the Leading Edge of the T Cell. The EMBO journal 2008, 27, 62-75. 44. Sampath, R.; Gallagher, P. J.; Pavalko, F. M. Cytoskeletal Interactions with the Leukocyte Integrin Β2 Cytoplasmic Tail Activation-Dependent Regulation of Associations with Talin and α-Actinin. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 33588-33594. 45. Rodius, S.; Chaloin, O.; Moes, M.; Schaffner-Reckinger, E.; Landrieu, I.; Lippens, G.; Lin, M.; Zhang, J.; Kieffer, N. The Talin Rod Ibs2 Α-Helix Interacts with the Β3 Integrin Cytoplasmic Tail Membrane-Proximal Helix by Establishing Charge Complementary Salt Bridges. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 24212-24223. 46. Wegener, K. L.; Partridge, A. W.; Han, J.; Pickford, A. R.; Liddington, R. C.; Ginsberg, M. H.; Campbell, I. D. Structural Basis of Integrin Activation by Talin. Cell 2007, 128, 171-182. 47. Garcı́a-Alvarez, B.; de Pereda, J. M.; Calderwood, D. A.; Ulmer, T. S.; Critchley, D.; Campbell, I. D.; Ginsberg, M. H.; Liddington, R. C. Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin. Molecular cell 2003, 11, 49-58. 48. Trappmann, B.; Gautrot, J. E.; Connelly, J. T.; Strange, D. G. T.; Li, Y.; Oyen, M. L.; Stuart, M. A. C.; Boehm, H.; Li, B. J.; Vogel, V., et al. Extracellular-Matrix Tethering Regulates Stem-Cell Fate. Nat Mater 2012, 11, 642-649. 49. Wen, J. H.; Vincent, L. G.; Fuhrmann, A.; Choi, Y. S.; Hribar, K. C.; Taylor-Weiner, H.; Chen, S. C.; Engler, A. J. Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation. Nat Mater 2014, 13, 979-987. 50. McBeath, R.; Pirone, D. M.; Nelson, C. M.; Bhadriraju, K.; Chen, C. S. Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal

28


Page 29 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Nano

Tension, and Rhoa Regulate Stem Cell Lineage Commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6, 483-495. 51. A. Paul Mould, S. K. A. a. M. J. H. Regulation of Integrin Α5β1-Fibronectin Interactions by Divalent Cations. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995, 10.1074/jbc.270.44.26270, 26270-26277. 52. Tiwari, S.; Askari, J. A.; Humphries, M. J.; Bulleid, N. J. Divalent Cations Regulate the Folding and Activation Status of Integrins During Their Intracellular Trafficking. J Cell Sci 2011, 124, 1672-1680. 53. Zhang, K.; Chen, J. F. The Regulation of Integrin Function by Divalent Cations. Cell Adhes Migr 2012, 6, 20-29. 54. Kong, F.; Garcia, A. J.; Mould, A. P.; Humphries, M. J.; Zhu, C. Demonstration of Catch Bonds between an Integrin and Its Ligand. J Cell Biol 2009, 185, 1275-1284. 55. Agnieszka Ligezowska, K. B., Johannes A Eble, Bernd Hoffmann, Beate Klösgen, Rudolf Merkel. Mechanically Enforced Bond Dissociation Reports Synergistic Influence of Mn2+ and Mg2+ on the Interaction between Integrin Α7β1 and Invasin. J. Mol. Recognit. 2011, 24(4):715-23. 56. Friedrichs, J.; Helenius, J.; Muller, D. J. Quantifying Cellular Adhesion to Extracellular Matrix Components by Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1353-1361.

29


ACS Nano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

82x36mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 30 of 30

Cells Sensing Mechanical Cues: Stiffness Influences the Lifetime of

Recommend Documents