Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF SCIENCES PHILADELPHIA
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
CHANGES IN PHENOLIC ACID CONTENT IN MAIZE DURING FOOD PRODUCT PROCESSING Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Rita H. Mumm, Kent Rausch, Gurshagan Kandhola, Nicole Yana, Mary Happ, Alexandra Ostezan, Matthew Wasmund, and Martin O. Bohn J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05242 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 19, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
CHANGES IN PHENOLIC ACID CONTENT IN MAIZE DURING FOOD PRODUCT
2
PROCESSING
3 4
Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer,1 Rita H. Mumm,1 Kent D. Rausch,2 Gurshagan Kandhola,2,3 Nicole
5
A. Yana,1 Mary M. Happ,1,4 Alexandra Ostezan,1,5 Matthew Wasmund,1 and Martin O. Bohn1* 1
6
1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
7 2
8
3
10
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, the University of Arkansas, 4183 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701
11 4
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 202 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583
13 14
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, the University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, 1304 West Pennsylvania Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
9
12
Department of Crop Sciences, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
5
Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, the University of Georgia, 111 Riverbend
15
Road, Athens, GA, 30602
16
*Corresponding author:
[email protected] 17 18
Keywords: Maize, Phenolics, Food Processing
19
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20
ABSTRACT
21
The notion that many nutrients and beneficial phytochemicals in maize are lost due to
22
food product processing is common, but this has not been studied in detail for the phenolic acids.
23
Information regarding changes in phenolic acid content throughout processing is highly valuable
24
because some phenolic acids are chemopreventive agents of aging-related diseases. It is
25
unknown when and why these changes in phenolic acid content might occur during processing,
26
whether some maize genotypes might be more resistant to processing induced changes in
27
phenolic acid content than other genotypes, or if processing affects the bioavailability of
28
phenolic acids in maize-based food products. For this study, a laboratory-scale processing
29
protocol was developed and used to process whole maize kernels into toasted cornflakes. High-
30
throughput microscale wet-lab analyses were applied to determine the concentrations of soluble
31
and insoluble-bound phenolic acids in samples of grain, three intermediate processing stages, and
32
toasted cornflakes obtained from twelve ex-PVP maize inbreds and seven hybrids. In the grain,
33
insoluble-bound ferulic acid was the most common phenolic acid, followed by insoluble-bound
34
p-coumaric acid and soluble cinnamic acid, a precursor to the phenolic acids. Notably, the ferulic
35
acid content was approximately 1,950 ߤg / g, more than ten times the concentration of many
36
fruits and vegetables. Processing reduced the content of the phenolic acids regardless of the
37
genotype. Most changes occurred during dry milling, due to the removal of the bran. The
38
concentration of bioavailable soluble ferulic and p-coumaric acid increased negligibly due to
39
thermal stresses. Therefore, the current dry milling based processing techniques used to
40
manufacture many maize-based foods, including breakfast cereals, are not conducive for
41
increasing the content of bioavailable phenolics in processed maize food products. This suggests
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 32
Page 3 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
42
that while maize is an excellent source of phenolics, alternative or complementary processing
43
methods must be developed before this nutritional resource can be utilized.
44
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
Page 4 of 32
INTRODUCTION
46
Diets rich in phenolic acids have been linked to the prevention of aging-related diseases
47
such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular disease.1-4 Although grains,
48
especially maize, tend to possess high concentrations of phenolic acids, these are primarily found
49
in the biologically unavailable, insoluble-bound form. Most of the phenolic acids in maize are
50
insoluble-bound hydroxycinnamic acids. The hydroxycinnamic acids, when present in their
51
soluble state, are especially known for their chemopreventive properties.3, 5 Since maize must be
52
processed prior to human consumption, it is of key importance to understand the effects of
53
processing on the nutritional value of maize. The effect of different processing techniques, such
54
as nixtamalization,6-7 steaming/autoclaving,8-9 and extrusion cooking,7,
55
content in maize has been well studied. Dewanto et al.8 showed that thermal processing releases
56
insoluble-bound phenolics into their bioavailable, soluble state.
57
commonly used method for the production of masa, tortillas, and tortilla chips, tends to remove
58
phenolics from the final product.6-7 Extrusion cooking, which can be used as an alternative to
59
nixtamalization for the production of some products, tends to retain more phenolics than
60
nixtamalizataion due to the retention of pericarp and aleurone tissues during processing.7
10-12
on the phenolics
Nixtamalization, the most
61
However, little is known about how other processing techniques, such as dry milling,
62
influence the phenolics content in maize. The primary product of dry milling are large flaking
63
grits. The large flaking grits are then further processed into products such as ready-to-eat
64
breakfast cereals (e.g. cornflakes) and snack foods.13 Most phenolics in maize are located in the
65
bran14 and are removed with the bran during milling and the production of many processed
66
maize-based foods.15 To what degree downstream processing activities (i.e., steaming, rolling,
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
toasting) increase the soluble phenolics content or how the bioavailability of the phenolics
68
content of maize-based food products is affected by processing is still unknown.
69
Research conducted by Butts-Wilmsmeyer et al.16 showed that considerable variability in
70
grain phenolic acid content exists among commercial maize inbreds and hybrids. However, little
71
is known about how the fate of phenolic acids during processing may differ among genotypes
72
that are representative of commercial germplasm. Since the processing stresses encountered
73
during the production of toasted cornflakes are similar to those involved in the processing of
74
other maize-based foods (Fig. 1a), a better understanding of the genetic characteristics, which
75
determine the phenotypic response to processing stresses could lead to the nutritional
76
improvement of maize-based processed food products. Thus, even though this study focuses
77
specifically on the stresses encountered during dry milling and subsequent processing, many of
78
the same processing stresses are encountered during different processing pathways. Processed
79
foods could be improved directly by selecting hybrids, which maintain favorable phenolic acid
80
concentrations throughout processing. However, if most of the phenolic acids are lost during
81
food processing or are still not bioavailable in the final product, alternative methods for
82
increasing the phenolic acid content of maize-based food products must be explored if more
83
nutritious processed food products are to be created.
84
The main goal of this study was to determine if 19 genetically and phenotypically diverse
85
maize inbreds and hybrids differed in regards to the fate of their phenolic acids when processed
86
into maize-based food products, specifically breakfast cereals and other dry-milled products. The
87
specific objectives were to (1) develop a highly efficient processing pipeline that allows for
88
beginning, intermediate, and final food products to be sampled, (2) determine the concentration
89
of the phenolics in these products, (3) determine when changes in phenolics content is occuring
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
90
during maize food product processing, and (4) determine if some maize genotypes produced
91
more nutritious processed food products than others.
92
processed maize food products is an ongoing research theme in our laboratories and builds
93
directly on the research of Macke et al,17 Butts-Wilmsmeyer and Bohn,18 and Butts-Wilmsmeyer
94
et al.16
Improving the nutritional value of
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 32
Page 7 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
MATERIALS AND METHODS
95 96
Plant Materials
97
All grain and flaking grit materials used in this study were acquired from the work of
98
Macke et al.17 Available data, which included weather data,19 grain quality characteristics,17
99
genotypic information,20 and phenolics content obtained from a preliminary wet-lab analysis,
100
were used in a multi-stage sampling approach to identify the most genetically and phenotypically
101
diverse subset of inbreds and hybrids. The overall goal of this multi-stage sampling approach
102
was to reduce the number of samples analyzed without losing the genetic and phenotypic
103
diversity of the materials used in Macke et al.17 Upon examination, it was noted that 2009 and
104
2010 had similar mild weather conditions. This is in contrast to 2011, which was characterized
105
by very hot and dry weather conditions during flowering, pollination, and seed set.19 Therefore,
106
to capture the phenotypic variability due to non-genetic effects while minimizing the number of
107
samples to be analyzed, we focused on only samples from 2009 and 2011 for this study. Three
108
replications for each of 2009 and 2011 were used. All 12 inbreds used in Macke et al,17 were
109
used in this study. Of the 66 hybrids used in Macke et al,17 13 hybrids were initially selected for
110
preliminary analyses based upon their dry milling efficiency, as reported in Butts-Wilmsmeyer et
111
al.16 Of these 13 hybrids, seven hybrids were selected based on their combined phenotypic and
112
genetic diversities (for more information, see Macke et al,17 van Heerwaarden et al,20 and the
113
“Statistical Analyses” section). A description of the preliminary wet-lab protocols and the
114
protocols used for determining the grain quality characteristics are given in the supplementary
115
information.
116
The rationale for the selection of seven hybrids was as follows: the set of 13 hybrids used
117
in Butts-Wilmsmeyer et al.16 could be grouped into three phenotypic clusters following the
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
118
cluster analysis detailed in the “Statistical Analyses” section, as indicated by a large jump in the
119
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) score when comparing the RMSE values for two clusters
120
versus three clusters. These clusters separated hybrids primarily based upon their soluble
121
phenolics content and dry milling efficiency (Table S1). These clusters could be characterized as
122
Cluster 1: moderate test weight, whole kernel soluble phenolics content, and flaking grit soluble
123
phenolics content; Cluster 2: high test weight and low soluble phenolics content at both the
124
whole kernel and flaking grit processing stages; and Cluster 3: low test weight and high soluble
125
phenolics content at both the whole kernel and flaking grit processing stages. Key hybrids were
126
selected from each of these phenotypic clusters so that the genotypic diversity of the inbred
127
parents was also represented. Therefore, while replicates of only two years and seven hybrids
128
and 12 inbreds were used in this study, these 19 entries collectively represented a considerable
129
portion of the genetic and phenotypic variability (Table S2) in current commercial maize
130
germplasm.21-22
131 132
Processing
133
Whole kernels and large flaking grit materials were available at the beginning of the
134
study. The process used was described in Rausch et al.13 and was modified by Macke et al.17 to
135
produce a large flaking grit material stream and a stream containing small endosperm particles,
136
bran, and germ. The large flaking grit material was processed into cornflakes using a modified
137
version of the protocol described by Kandhola.23 Details of this protocol can be found in the
138
supplementary information under “Laboratory-Scale Processing Protocol.” Small samples were
139
taken after the pressure cooking (cooked grits), baking (baked grits), and toasting (toasted
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 32
Page 9 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
140
cornflakes) portions of this processing work (Fig. 1b). All samples were dried at 65°C for at least
141
eight hours and then ground to a fine powder using a coffee grinder.
142 143
Extraction and Quantification of Soluble and Insoluble-Bound Phenolics
144
The soluble phenolic acids were extracted and quantified using the procedure as outlined
145
in Butts-Wilmsmeyer et al.16 Following the extraction of the soluble phenolic acids, the
146
insoluble-bound phenolic acids were extracted and quantified using the protocol, with ߙ-amylase
147
digestion, as outlined in Butts-Wilmsmeyer and Bohn18 and as modified by Butts-Wilmsmeyer et
148
al.16
149 150
Statistical Analysis
151
Cluster Analysis for Multi-Stage Sampling Approach
152
To determine the phenotypic dissimilarity between the 13 hybrids used in Butts-
153
Wilmsmeyer et al,16 hierarchical clustering was conducted using Ward’s Minimum Variance
154
Approach in SAS (version 9.3). Phenotypic traits used in hierarchical clustering were test weight,
155
dry milling efficiency, whole kernel soluble phenolic content, flaking grit soluble phenolic
156
content, moisture, oil, starch, and protein content. Test weight and dry milling efficiency
157
measures for each of the entries were obtained from Macke et al.17 All of these traits are related
158
to grain composition and may influence the concentration of other beneficial phytochemicals.
159
SAS (version 9.3) PROC MEANS was used to calculate the mean of each phenotypic trait for
160
each genotype. Plot phenotypic means were used in the calculations of the genotypic (entry)
161
means. These means were used in the construction of a dendrogram in PROC CLUSTER. Since
162
Ward’s Minimum Variance Approach was used, the distance between two clusters can be
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
163
defined as “the ANOVA sum of squares between two clusters added up over all the variables.”24
164
The arithmetic means of each trait for each cluster was calculated using PROC TREE and PROC
165
MEANS. Genotypic data reported in van Heerwaarden, et al.20 and hierarchical clustering were
166
used to create a dendrogram of the genetic distance of the twelve parental inbreds. A total of
167
45,997 SNPs were used to calculate the genetic distance (Roger’s W Coefficient) between
168
individuals in SIMGEND. A dendrogram was created using SAHN and the UPGA clustering
169
method and was provided by Dr. Mark Mikel, University of Illinois. Representative hybrids were
170
selected from each of the three phenotypic clusters generated with the condition that the parental
171
inbreds of the hybrids selected collectively represented most of the genetic diversity in the total
172
set of 12 parental inbreds.
173 174
Identification of Processing Stages where Changes in Phenolics Content Occurred
175
Phenolic acid means of each hybrid were plotted against the processing stage. An
176
apparent lack of change in phenolic acid content, as indicated by a horizontal plateau in the plot,
177
was further investigated using a split-plot in an RCBD where the whole plot unit was the field
178
plot from which grain was harvested, and the subplot unit was processing stage. Model 1 was
179
used to analyze both insoluble-bound ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid. Soluble phenolics were
180
not of immediate concern due to their overall low concentrations and the small change in their
181
concentrations after steaming (cooking). Two hundred samples (40 whole plots and 200
182
subplots) were analyzed as part of this portion of the study, and all of these came from 2009. The
183
following mixed linear model was applied:
184
ݕ = ߤ + ܴ + ߙ + ߝଵ + ߬ + ߙ߬ + ߝଶ [1]
185
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 32
Page 11 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
186
where ݕ is the observed concentration of the phenolic compound under observation, ߤ is the
187
grand population mean, ܴ is the random effect of the ݅ ௧ field replication, NID(0, ߪோଶ ), ߙ is the
188
ଶ fixed effect of the ݆ ௧ genotype, ߝଵ is the random whole plot error term, NID(0, ߪଵ ), ߬ is the
189
fixed effect of the ݇ ௧ processing stage, ߙ߬ is the fixed interaction between the ݆ ௧ genotype
190
ଶ and the ݇ ௧ processing stage, and ߝଶ is the random subplot error term, NID(0, ߪଶ ). At least
191
two replications of each hybrid and each inbred were analyzed. Model 1 was used separately for
192
hybrids and inbreds.
193
Multi-degree of freedom contrasts and slice statements were used to test the difference in
194
processing stages if genotype × processing stage interactions were significant. The ANOVA as
195
described above was conducted in PROC MIXED of SAS (version 9.3). The assumptions of the
196
ANOVA were verified as described below.
197 198
Phytochemical Persistence Through Processing
199
A split-plot in an RCBD was used to analyze the dynamics in phenolic acid content
200
through processing, where the whole plot unit was the field plot from which grain was harvested,
201
and the subplot unit was processing stage. The following mixed linear model was used
202
ݕ = ߤ + ܻ + ܴሺሻ + ߙ + ܻߙ + ߝଵ + ߬ + ܻ߬ + ߙ߬ + ܻߙ߬ + ߝଶ [2]
203 204
where ݕ is the observed concentration of the phenolic compound under observation, ߤ is the
205
grand population mean, ܻ is the random effect of the ݅ ௧ year, NID(0, ߪଶ ), ܴሺሻ is the random
206
effect of the ݆ ௧ rep nested within the ݅ ௧ year, NID(0, ߪோଶ ), ߙ is the fixed effect of the ݇ ௧
207
genotype, ܻߙ is the random interaction between the ݅ ௧ year and the ݇ ௧ genotype, NID(0,
208
ଶ ଶ ߪఈ ), ߝଵ is the whole plot error term, NID(0, ߪଵ ), ߬ is the fixed effect of the ݈ ௧ processing
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
209
stage, ܻ߬ is the random interaction between the ݅ ௧ year and the ݈ ௧ processing stage, NID(0,
210
ଶ ߪఛ ሻ, ߙ߬ is the fixed interaction between the ݇ ௧ genotype and the ݈ ௧ processing stage, ܻߙ߬
211
is the random three-factor interaction between the ݅ ௧ year, the ݇ ௧ genotype, and the ݈ ௧
212
ଶ processing stage, and ߝଶ is the subplot error term, NID(0, ߪଶ ). In both Models 1 and 2, the
213
effect of genotype is considered fixed because the genotypes were selected specifically. Model 2
214
was used for all traits measured as part of the evaluation of the changes in phytochemical content
215
through processing. Inbreds and hybrids were analyzed separately.
216
The ANOVA as described above was conducted in PROC MIXED using SAS (version
217
9.3). Additionally, R was used to create an interaction plot (profile plot) of the interaction
218
between hybrid genotype and processing stage using the interaction.plot command. Multi-degree
219
of freedom contrasts and slice statements were used to test the difference in processing stages if a
220
significant interaction between genotype and processing stage occurred.
221 222
Verification of ANOVA Assumptions
223
In each model described above, residuals were obtained from the MIXED procedure and
224
then analyzed using the UNIVARIATE procedure to check the assumption of normality. The
225
Brown-Forsythe modification of the Levene test was used to check the assumption of
226
homogenous variances among the stage and genotype treatment combinations. If the assumptions
227
of normality or homogenous variances were violated, then the appropriate data transformation or
228
outlier removal was performed. The QQ-plots and histograms of the residuals were used in the
229
evaluation of whether outlying observations should be removed. Observations whose residuals
230
significantly deviated from the normal line in the QQ-plot and that appeared to be drastically
231
skewing the distribution of the residuals in the histogram were deleted.
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 32
Page 13 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
232
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
233
Identification of Processing Stages Where Significant Changes in Phenolic Acid Content
234
Occur
235
To identify key processing stages that should be monitored for changes in phenolic acid
236
content, we examined the phenolic acid content in whole kernels and toasted cornflakes as well
237
as three intermediate processing stages using samples from 2009. We noted that only three
238
processing stages were necessary to characterize the change in phenolic acid content throughout
239
processing. Plots showed that the soluble ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, and cinnamic acid
240
content remained relatively stable between the cooked grit and the final toasted cornflake stage.
241
There was a slight decrease in the concentration between baked grits and the final toasted
242
cornflakes, but the overall change was negligible. Plots of insoluble-bound ferulic acid and p-
243
coumaric acid content through the five different processing stages showed a drastic decrease
244
between the whole kernel and flaking grit stage and then a small decrease after the flaking grit
245
stage before stabilizing for the remainder of processing (Fig. 2 and S4). There was also a
246
decrease in the concentration of soluble cinnamic acid following dry milling before nearly
247
stabilizing between the cooked grit and toasted cornflake processing stages (Fig. S4c). These
248
results indicated that whole kernels and flaking grit materials should be analyzed for their
249
phenolic acid content. Since the plots of the phenolic acid content by processing stage indicated
250
that there might not be a significant change between the cooked grit and the final toasted
251
cornflake product, multi-degree of freedom contrasts were constructed to test whether the change
252
between the cooked grit and the final toasted cornflake were significant for any of the hybrids.
253
Multi-degree of freedom contrasts indicated that the change in insoluble-bound phenolic acid
254
content between the cooked grit and final toasted cornflake was not significant, regardless of the
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
255
genotype under study (Table S3). Therefore, only the whole kernel, large flaking grit, and toasted
256
cornflake stages were used for subsequent phytochemical analyses.
257
These results are in agreement with the available literature. Adom and Liu25 and Yadav et
258
al.26 noted that most of the phenolic acids in maize are in their insoluble-bound form. Yadav et
259
al.26 also found that the most predominant phenolic acids in maize were insoluble-bound ferulic
260
acid and insoluble-bound p-coumaric acid. Considering that most of the phenolic acids are
261
located in the bran and that the bran is removed during dry milling, it is not surprising that the
262
overall concentration of the phenolic acids decreased after dry milling. Furthermore, while some
263
of the insoluble-bound phenolic acids were released into the soluble state, most likely due to
264
thermal stresses during cooking and baking, it does not appear that the concentration of the
265
insoluble-bound phenolic acids fluctuated much following dry milling. These findings suggest
266
that the structure of the phenolic acids, particularly when they are esterified to arabinoxylans,
267
inhibits degradation of the phenolic acids when exposed to thermal stresses. However, during
268
rolling and toasting, it appears that some of the soluble phenolic acids were degraded. The
269
degradation of the soluble phenolic acids is possible because, unlike their insoluble-bound
270
counterparts, the soluble phenolic acids are not bound to arabinoxylans and are not as protected
271
from thermal stress. However, this change in the soluble phenolic content is small.
272 273
Phenolic Acid Content Throughout Processing
274
Having identified the most important processing stages at which changes in phenolic
275
acids occur during the production of toasted cornflakes, the 19 entries were analyzed for their
276
phenolic acid content in the whole kernels, in the flaking grit materials, and also in the final
277
toasted cornflakes using samples from both 2009 and 2011. The phenolic acids were almost
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 32
Page 15 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
278
exclusively composed of hydroxycinnamic acids, as expected. Insoluble-bound ferulic acid was
279
the most prevalent (average concentration of 1,948.4 ߤg / g in the hybrid whole kernels),
280
followed by insoluble-bound p-coumaric acid (176.4 ߤg / g) and then soluble cinnamic acid
281
(63.7 ߤg / g). These results are in agreement with the limited information available in the
282
literature.26-28 However, this study analyzed a much broader germplasm base than previous
283
studies, and our results are directly pertinent to maize grown in the U.S. Cornbelt. For instance,
284
Serratos et al.28 analyzed only four maize entries (three local populations from Belize and one
285
double-cross hybrid), and Yadav et al.26 and Adom and Liu25 did not analyze individual
286
genotypes in their studies. Therefore, our research extends the findings in the literature to a
287
significantly broader germplasm base that is directly tied to U.S. commercial maize germplasm.
288
Furthermore, this indicates that maize whole kernels are considerably more concentrated than
289
other plant sources in terms of their ferulic acid content. For instance, Mattila et al.29 reported
290
that rhubarb, blueberries, and cherries have ferulic acid contents of 20.0, 12.9, and 4.6 ߤg / g,
291
respectively. Unlike these other plant sources, however, maize must be processed prior to
292
human consumption, and the phenolics in maize are largely in the insoluble-bound form.
293
The largest loss of phenolic acids, particularly insoluble-bound ferulic acid and insoluble-
294
bound p-coumaric acid, occurred during dry milling (Fig. 3). The large loss in phenolic acid
295
content at this stage was expected, mainly because the majority of phenolic acids in maize
296
kernels are located in the bran,14 and the bran and germ are removed during dry milling.30 While
297
hybrid maize kernels had an average of 1,948.4 ߤg / g of insoluble-bound ferulic acid and 176.4
298
ߤg / g of insoluble-bound p-coumaric acid at the whole kernel processing stage, the average
299
concentration of insoluble-bound ferulic acid and insoluble-bound p-coumaric acid dropped to
300
980.0 ߤg / g and 74.5 ߤg / g at the flaking grit stage before stabilizing at approximately 900 ߤg /
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
301
g and 55 ߤg / g for the remainder of processing, respectively. In comparison, the average soluble
302
ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid content in the hybrids increased from only 1.5 ߤg / g and 1.8 ߤg
303
/ g to 7.3 ߤg / g and 7.0 ߤg / g during processing, respectively. Additionally, the soluble
304
cinnamic acid content decreased from 71.2 ߤg / g to 26.7 ߤg / g. A similar result was observed
305
among the inbreds (Table 1).
306
The variance in phenolic acid content among hybrids and inbreds decreased throughout
307
processing. In regards to insoluble-bound ferulic acid, the phenotypic variance among hybrid
308
genotypes dropped from 82,811.6 ቀ ቁ to 54,447.6 ቀ ቁ between the whole kernel and final
309
toasted cornflake. Similarly, the phenotypic variance among hybrid genotypes for their p-
310
coumaric acid content dropped from 1,899.2 ቀ ቁ to 636.0 ቀ ቁ between the whole kernel and
311
final toasted cornflake. Similar trends were recorded for the inbreds used in this study (Table 1).
312
These results, taken in conjunction with the results of Rumpagapom,14 indicate that not only are
313
most of the insoluble-bound hydroxycinnamic acids located in the bran, but most of the
314
variability in hydroxycinnamic acid content is also localized in the bran. Since plant
315
improvement through plant breeding occurs via the exploitation of phenotypic variability, the
316
loss of variability in both insoluble-bound ferulic and p-coumaric acid indicates that increasing
317
the phenolic acid content of processed maize food products may be difficult.
ఓ ଶ
ఓ ଶ
ఓ ଶ
ఓ ଶ
318
Furthermore, the rank of a particular hybrid at the whole kernel processing stage in
319
regards to its phenolic acid content was not indicative of the rank of that hybrid in later
320
processing stages (Fig. S5). Since the rank of the hybrids changed throughout processing, the
321
concentration of insoluble-bound hydroxycinnamic acids in the whole kernels can not be used to
322
predict the concentration at other processing stages. This conclusion is supported by the
323
significant interaction between genotype and processing stage (Tables S4 and S5). Therefore, to 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 32
Page 17 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
324
improve the concentration of hydroxycinnamic acids in toasted cornflakes and other maize-based
325
processed foods, the final processed product must be analyzed. In a plant breeding setting, this is
326
laborious, time-consuming, and requires large laboratory space for processing.
327
Regardless of the genotype, most of the phenolic acids present in the whole kernel were
328
not contained within the flaking grit materials or the final toasted cornflake product. Most
329
importantly, those phenolic acids that remained were primarily present in their least bioavailable
330
form as insoluble-bound hydroxycinnamic acids. Adam et al. (2002) found that the insoluble-
331
bound hydroxycinnamic acids tended not to be absorbed. Rather, these compounds serve as
332
cross-linkages between arabinoxylan fibers and exhibit negligible chemopreventive properties in
333
regards to the prevention of cancer or neurodegenerative diseases. These results, taken in
334
conjunction with the knowledge that the production and wet-lab analysis of multiple processing
335
stages during this project were very time-consuming, indicates that improving the concentration
336
of bioavailable hydroxycinnamic acids by selecting for hybrids which maintain positive
337
phytochemical attributes throughout processing is not feasible. Therefore, in order to improve the
338
phenolic acid content of processed maize food products, either current food product processing
339
methods could be changed, which may be impractical or impossible, or phenolic acids removed
340
during dry milling could be added back to the processed food product.
341
In summary, to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first holistic study that concurrently
342
considers the disciplines of commercial plant breeding, human nutrition, and bioprocessing. We
343
envision that the results of this study will prove useful to the practical and efficient development
344
of high quality crops that meet both nutritional and processing standards. Specifically, we
345
developed a highly efficient processing and analytical pipeline that allows for the
346
characterization of processing and nutritional parameters. While this pipeline may be of little use
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
347
in large plant breeding studies, it could prove useful in both human nutrition and bioprocessing
348
applications. Furthermore, we found that maize typical of the U.S. Cornbelt does contain high
349
concentrations of phenolics, but these are typically removed with coproducts during dry-milling.
350
The remaining phenolics in the toasted cornflakes after processing were still bound to the cell
351
wall hemicellulose.
352
products with a higher concentration of phenolic acids, especially soluble phenolic acids, may be
353
with an all-natural food additive: phenolic acids extracted from the coproducts of common
354
milling procedures.
Therefore, the most efficient method of biofortifying processed food
355
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 32
Page 19 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ABBREVIATIONS USED
356 357
NSS – Non-Stiff Stalk
358
SSS – Stiff Stalk Synthetic
359
RMSE - Root Mean Square Error
360
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
361 362
The authors would like to thank Tom Patterson and the Analytical Technologies Team at Dow
363
AgroSciences for the use of their laboratory facilities and for their mentorship.
364
FUNDING SOURCES
365 366
This work was funded in part through gifts from the Kellogg Company and Dow AgroSciences
367
and through USDA Hatch Grant, award ILLU-802-354. Student support was provided by the
368
Illinois Distinguished Fellowship and the William B. and Nancy L. Ambrose Fellowship in Crop
369
Sciences.
370
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
371 372
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
373
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
374 375
•
Laboratory scale processing protocol.
376
•
Protocols for the preliminary analysis of nutritional traits for phenotypic cluster analysis.
377
•
Table of means of preliminary phenotypic traits by cluster.
378
•
Table of efficacy of multistage sampling technique in maintaining phenotypic variance.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
379
•
hydroxycinnamic acid content in the cooked grits, baked grits, and toasted cornflakes.
380 381
Table of multi-degree of freedom contrasts testing the difference in insoluble-bound
•
Table of the significance of the genotype-by-processing stage interaction by compound and hybrid/inbred generation.
382 383
•
Table of the ANOVA summary.
384
•
Table of the contrasts to test the significance of the stage main effect for given levels of another factor in the case of a significant two-factor interaction between terms.
385 386 387
•
Additional figures which are not necessary for the understanding of research results but which provide information for additional understanding.
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 32
Page 21 of 32
388
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
REFERNCES
389 390 391 392
1. Adam, A.; Crespy, V.; Levrat-Verny, M. A.; Leenhardt, F.; Leuillet, M.; Demigne, C.; Remesy, C., The Bioavailability of Ferulic Acid is Governed Primarily by the Food Matrix Rather than its Metabolism in Intestine and Liver in Rats. Journal of Nutrition 2002, 132 (7), 1962-1968.
393 394 395
2. Ames, B. N.; Shigenaga, M. K.; Hagen, T. M., Oxidants, Antioxidants, and the Degenerative Diseases of Aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1993, 90 (17), 7915-7922.
396 397
3. Fresco, P.; Borges, F.; Diniz, C.; Marques, M. P. M., New Insights on the Anticancer Properties of Dietary Polyphenols. Medicinal Research Reviews 2006, 26 (6), 747-766.
398 399 400
4. Scapagnini, G.; Vasto, S.; Abraham, N. G.; Calogero, C.; Zella, D.; Galvano, F., Modulation of Nrf2/ARE Pathway by Food Polyphenols: A Nutritional Neuroprotective Strategy for Cognitive and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Molecular Neurobiology 2011, 44 (2), 192-201.
401 402 403 404
5. Kanski, J.; Aksenova, M.; Stoyanova, A.; Butterfield, D. A., Ferulic Acid Antioxidant Protection Against Hydroxyl and Peroxyl Radical Oxidation in Synaptosomal and Neuronal Cell Culture Systems in vitro: Structure-Activity Studies. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 2002, 13 (5), 273-281.
405 406 407
6. de la Parra, C.; Serna Saldivar, S. O.; Liu, R. H., Effect of processing on the phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activity of corn for production of masa, tortillas, and tortilla chips. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2007, 55 (10), 4177-4183.
408 409 410 411
7. Mora-Rochin, S.; Gutierrez-Uribe, J. A.; Serna-Saldivar, S. O.; Sanchez-Pena, P.; ReyesMoreno, C.; Milan-Carrillo, J., Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of tortillas produced from pigmented maize processed by conventional nixtamalization or extrusion cooking. Journal of Cereal Science 2010, 52 (3), 502-508.
412 413
8. Dewanto, V.; Wu, X. Z.; Liu, R. H., Processed Sweet Corn Has Higher Antioxidant Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002, 50 (17), 4959-4964.
414 415 416
9. Randhir, R.; Kwon, Y.-I.; Shetty, K., Effect of thermal processing on phenolics, antioxidant activity and health-relevant functionality of select grain sprouts and seedlings. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2008, 9 (3), 355-364.
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
417 418 419
10. Ragaee, S.; Seetharaman, K.; Abdel-Aal, E.-S. M., The Impact of Milling and Thermal Processing on Phenolic Compounds in Cereal Grains. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2014, 54 (7), 837-849.
420 421 422
11. Wang, T.; He, F.; Chen, G., Improving bioaccessibility and bioavailability of phenolic compounds in cereal grains through processing technologies: A concise review. Journal of Functional Foods 2014, 7, 101-111.
423 424 425 426
12. Asami, D. K.; Hong, Y. J.; Barrett, D. M.; Mitchell, A. E., Comparison of the total phenolic and ascorbic acid content of freeze-dried and air-dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic, and sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003, 51 (5), 1237-1241.
427 428 429
13. Rausch, K. D.; Pruiett, L. E.; Wang, P.; Xu, L.; Belyea, R. L.; Tumbleson, M. E., Laboratory Measurement of Yield and Composition of Dry-Milled Corn Fractions Using a Shortened, Single-Stage Tempering Procedure. Cereal Chemistry 2009, 86 (4), 434-438.
430 431
14. Rumpagapom, P. Structural Features of Cereal Bran Arabinoxylans Related to Colon Fermentation Rate. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2011.
432 433 434 435
15. Somavat, P.; Li, Q.; Kumar, D.; de Mejia, E. G.; Liu, W.; Rausch, K. D.; Juvik, J. A.; Tumbleson, M.; Singh, V., A new lab scale corn dry milling protocol generating commercial sized flaking grits for quick estimation of coproduct yield and composition. Industrial Crops and Products 2017, 109, 92-100.
436 437 438
16. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, C. J.; Mumm, R. H.; Bohn, M. O., Concentration of Beneficial Phytochemicals in Harvested Grain of US Yellow Dent Maize (Zea mays L.) Germplasm. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2017, 65 (38), 8311-8318.
439 440 441
17. Macke, J. A.; Bohn, M. O.; Rausch, K. D.; Mumm, R. H., Genetic Factors Underlying Dry-Milling Efficiency and Flaking-Grit Yield Examined in US Maize Germplasm. Crop Science 2016, 56 (5), 2516-2526.
442 443
18. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, C. J.; Bohn, M. O., High-Throughput Extraction of Insoluble-Bound Ferulic Acid In Maize. Crop Science 2016, 56 (6), 3152-3159.
444 445
19. Angel, J. Climate Observations for Champaign-Urbana, IL. http://www.isws.illinois.edu/atmos/statecli/cuweather/.
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 32
Page 23 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
446 447 448
20. van Heerwaarden, J.; Hufford, M. B.; Ross-Ibarra, J., Historical genomics of North American maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109 (31), 12420-12425.
449 450 451
21. Hauck, A. L.; Johnson, G. R.; Mikel, M. A.; Mahone, G. S.; Morales, A. J.; Rocheford, T. R.; Bohn, M. O., Generation Means Analysis of Elite Ex-Plant Variety Protection Commercial Inbreds: A New Public Maize Genetics Resource. Crop Science 2014, 54 (1), 174-189.
452 453
22. Mikel, M. A., Availability and analysis of proprietary dent corn inbred lines with expired US plant variety protection. Crop Science 2006, 46 (6), 2555-2560.
454 455
23. Kandhola, G. Processing and Genetic Effects on Resistant Starch in Corn Flakes. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2015.
456 457 458 459
24. SAS Institute The CLUSTER Procedure: Clustering Methods:: SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's Guide. https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63347/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_cl uster_sect012.htm.
460 461
25. Adom, K. K.; Liu, R. H., Antioxidant Activity of Grains. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002, 50 (21), 6182-6187.
462 463 464
26. Yadav, M. P.; Moreau, R. A.; Hicks, K. B., Phenolic Acids, Lipids, and Proteins Associated with Purified Corn Fiber Arabinoxylans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2007, 55 (3), 943-947.
465 466 467 468
27. Arnason, J. T.; Gale, J.; Debeyssac, B. C.; Sen, A.; Miller, S. S.; Philogene, B. J. R.; Lambert, J. D. H.; Fulcher, R. G.; Serratos, A.; Mihm, J., Role of Phenolics in Resistance of Maize Grain to the Stored Grain Insects, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch). Journal of Stored Products Research 1992, 28 (2), 119-126.
469 470 471 472
28. Serratos, A.; Arnason, J. T.; Nozzolillo, C.; Lambert, J. D. H.; Philogene, B. J. R.; Fulcher, G.; Davidson, K.; Peacock, L.; Atkinson, J.; Morand, P., Factors Contributing to Resistance of Exotic Maize Populations to Maize Weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1987, 13 (4), 751-762.
473 474
29. Mattila, P.; Hellstrom, J.; Torronen, R., Phenolic acids in berries, fruits, and beverages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2006, 54 (19), 7193-7199.
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
475 476
30. Slavin, J. L.; Jacobs, D.; Marquart, L., Grain Processing and Nutrition. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2000, 40 (4), 309-326.
477
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 32
Page 25 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. Processed maize food product production. (a) Processing steps involved in the production of many maize-based food products. The three major categories of maize food product processing are alkaline hydrolysis, wet milling, and dry milling. The toasted cornflakes production pipeline is shown in red. The various stresses that are encountered during the production of various maize-based food products are also shown. (b) Cornflake production pipeline, including pre-processing steps such as plant breeding and grain production. Marketable grain products are indicated by large yellow circles. All processes involved in the production of toasted cornflakes, including pre-processing steps, are indicated by blue rectangles. Figure 2. Change in ferulic acid content by processing stage – all five processing stages. Means from the same hybrid are represented by the same color in each processing stage. Hybrids are color-coded as follows: Red = B73×Mo17, Green = B73×PHG47, Blue = LH1×Mo17, Black = PHJ40×LH123HT, Gray = PHJ40×Mo17, Purple = PH207×PHG47, and Tan = PHG39×PHZ51. Processing stages are abbreviated as follows: WK = Whole Kernel, FG =Flaking Grit, CG = Cooked Grit, BG = Baked Grit, and TO = Toasted Cornflake. (a) The insoluble-bound ferulic acid content drastically decreased between the whole kernel processing stage and the large flaking grit and then again by the end of processing. However, the insolublebound ferulic acid content remained relatively stable between the cooked grit and toasted flake processing stages. (b) While the soluble ferulic acid content increased during processing, the magnitude of that increase is very small, especially in comparison to the amount of insolublebound ferulic acid lost during processing. Figure 3. Change in insoluble-bound phenolic acid content throughout processing using two years and seven hybrids to analyze key processing stages. Means from the same hybrid are shown in the same color in each of the processing stages. Hybrids are color-coded as follows: Green = LH1×Mo17, Blue = B73×Mo17, Brown = PHG39×PHZ51, Black = PHJ40×LH123HT, Red = B73×PHG47, Orange = PHJ40×Mo17, and Purple = PH207×PHG47. Processing stages are abbreviated as follows: WK = Whole Kernel, FG = Flaking Grit, TO = Toasted Cornflake. (a) Change in insoluble bound ferulic acid content throughout processing. (b) Change in insoluble-bound p-coumaric acid content throughout processing.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 32
TABLES Table 1. Mean and standard deviations (SD) of phenolic acids and cinnamic acid at different processing stages
Soluble Processing Stage
Generation
Cinnamic Acid
Ferulic Acid
Insoluble-Bound p-Coumaric Acid
————————— µg/g ————————
Ferulic Acid
p-Coumaric Acid
————— µg/g —————
Whole Kernels HYBRIDS Mean SD
63.67 43.34
1.50 0.51
1.81 0.44
1,948.41 287.77
176.40 43.58
INBREDS Mean SD
90.87 68.15
1.78 0.55
2.42 0.81
2,004.42 374.13
223.08 81.62
Large Flaking Grits HYBRIDS Mean SD
34.77 28.42
2.17 0.46
2.13 0.66
980.03 273.79
74.54 34.99
INBREDS Mean SD
31.86 41.38
2.35 0.57
2.21 0.75
787.05 234.30
63.81 38.49
HYBRIDS Mean SD
26.70 21.73
7.28 1.98
7.03 2.52
902.83 233.34
56.48 25.22
INBREDS Mean SD
27.32 30.31
7.13 2.32
8.10 3.03
786.92 273.04
50.50 32.81
Toasted Cornflakes
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
FIGURE GRAPHICS
a
b
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 32
a
b
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
a
b
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
GRAPHIC FOR TABLE OF CONTENTS
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 32
Page 31 of 32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 32