Subscriber access provided by University Libraries, University of Memphis
Article
Characterization of Synergistic Embryotoxicity of Nickel and Buprofezin in Zebrafish Tingting Ku, Wei Yan, Wuyao Jia, Yang Yun, Na Zhu, Guangke Li, and Nan Sang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es506293t • Publication Date (Web): 19 Mar 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 23, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Title page
2 3 4 5
Characterization of Synergistic Embryotoxicity of Nickel and Buprofezin in
6
Zebrafish
7 8
Tingting Ku, Wei Yan, Wuyao Jia, Yang Yun, Na Zhu, Guangke Li, Nan Sang*
9
College of Environment and Resource, Research Center of Environment and Health, Shanxi University,
10
Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, PR China
11 12
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-351-7011932
13
Fax: +86-351-7011932
14
E-mail:
[email protected] 15
Mailing address: Nan Sang
16
College of Environment and Resource,
17
Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006
18
People’s Republic of China
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 33
Page 3 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
46
ABSTRACT: Multiple pollutants, usually at low levels, co-exist and may interact in the environment. It
47
is therefore important to analyze the toxicity of mixtures of co-existing chemicals to evaluate the
48
potential ecological risk. Concern regarding the co-occurrence and combined bio-effects of heavy
49
metals and organic insecticides in aquatic settings has existed for many years, but a clear
50
understanding of the interactions between and potential combined toxicity of these chemicals remains
51
elusive. In the present study, the combined effects of the heavy metal nickel (NiSO4) and insect growth
52
regulator buprofezin on the induction of embryo toxicity in zebrafish were assessed. By applying
53
nonlinear regression to the concentration-response data with each of the chemicals using the Hill and
54
Langmuir functions and computing the predictions using the model of concentration addition (CA), we
55
confirmed that NiSO4 and buprofezin acted together to produce synergistic embryotoxicity in zebrafish.
56
Subsequently, we further found that the combination of NiSO4 and buprofezin formed a complex that
57
facilitated the uptake of nickel (Ni) and buprofezin by the embryos. Following this, we clarified that an
58
oxidative mechanism of the complex might underlie the synergistic embryotoxicity of NiSO4 and
59
buprofezin.
60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
68
INTRODUCTION
69
Multiple pollutants, usually at low levels, coexist and may interact in the environment. For this
70
reason, studies of the concentration-response relationship of individual chemicals cannot reflect the
71
actual exposure risk to organisms. Therefore, a key question in the risk assessment for co-exposures is
72
whether mixture effects occur when chemicals are combined at low doses that individually do not
73
induce observable effects. Awareness of the need to address combined exposures is growing among
74
experts, and mounting evidence indicates that there is a combined toxicity as a result of simultaneous
75
co-exposure to chemicals. This is especially true for the combined bio-effects of heavy metals and
76
organic insecticides in aquatic settings, although studies of these interactions are not new. However,
77
current reports regarding harmful chemicals appear regularly in media outlets, and communication to
78
the public of the risks of these interactions and the potential combined effects at low concentrations is
79
still a significant problem.
80
Buprofezin (2-tert-butylimino-3- isopropyl-5-phenyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinan-4-one) is an insect growth
81
regulator characterized by a broad-spectrum, specific mode of action and a good record of
82
environmental safety and has risen in popularity for agriculture use.
83
buprofezin technical is approximately 4,500 tons/year. Due to its long-term retention, buprofezin
84
residues can be detected in fruits, vegetables, crops, soil and aquatic environments,4-6 and their
85
presence in the environment is a potential problem. Nickel (Ni) is a naturally occurring metallic element
86
in the earth's crust, and its concentration in surface water and groundwater ranges between 1 and 10
87
µg/L. Because Ni and its compounds are widely used in industry for various applications such as
88
electroplating, welding, flame cutting, flame spraying and mold making,7 they are inevitably found at
89
elevated levels in sediments, the water column, and biota, with concentrations of up to 100 to 1000
1-3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Currently, Chinese production of
Page 4 of 33
Page 5 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
90
µg/L in freshwater and estuarine areas surrounding heavily developed urban areas.8 In addition, dietary
91
intake through contaminated foodstuffs is another primary route of Ni exposure.9
92
Environmental surveys have shown the co-occurrence of Ni and buprofezin in aquatic
93
environments. In the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam, buprofezin in soils and sediments was
94
omnipresent, and it was detected in all samples during both rice seasons with concentrations of up to
95
521 µg/kg dm. Furthermore, buprofezin is the second most frequently detected insecticide in surface
96
water and occasionally occurs in drinking water, with a quantification frequency of 58.7 % and 4.8 %
97
and a median concentration of 0.19 and 0.12 µg/L, respectively. In contrast, in the Mekong River delta
98
and its associated coastal zone, Ni has been detected as one of the trace elements in the dissolved
99
phase with concentrations of 7.8 and 8.4 nM and has been found in suspended matter and superficial
100
sediments in concentrations of 32 and 18 µg/g.10-12 In addition, preliminary studies have indicated that
101
buprofezin and Ni co-exist in food and drink. Since buprofezin was recommended for use on exportable
102
grapes in 2006, its residues have frequently been detected in wine. Whereas, Ni is typically one of the
103
ultra microelements detected in wines from different regions.13,14 Among foodstuffs, relatively high
104
concentrations of Ni are present in the leaves of the tea plant Camellia sinensis, whereas buprofezin
105
residue has been found in tea samples.15,16 Furthermore, considering that Ni is an essential
106
micronutrient and consistently found in organisms at low levels, even in the absence of elevated Ni
107
exposure,
108
hydrophobicity and stability in acid and alkali environments (the half-life is up to approximately 36−104
109
days ), it is reasonable for us to expect that there is an increase in opportunities for co-exposure to
110
buprofezin and Ni, and with this increase, the environmental safety of these chemicals, especially at
111
low concentrations, are challenged.
17-19
and buprofezin residues are commonly detected in plants, soil and water
5,6
with high
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 33
112
Despite the coexistence of these two substances in the environment, their ecological and health
113
risk assessments have been primarily on the basis of the toxicological effects of the individual
114
substances. The toxic effects of Ni in aquatic organisms, including oligochaetes, mollusks, fish and sea
115
urchins,21-23 have been evaluated. These effects primarily include respiratory injuries to freshwater fish
116
involving impaired gas exchange due to severely limiting the diffusive capabilities of the gills,
117
increased morphological abnormality and mortality. Previous studies of buprofezin toxicity have mainly
118
focused on the resultant dose-dependent reductions in the body length and spawning rates of Daphnia
119
and decreases in the hatching and survival rates of African catfish embryos.
120
interaction between Ni and buprofezin has not been investigated thus far, and their combined toxicity at
121
low doses and the relevant mechanisms for such toxicity remain unclear.
122
27,28
24-26
and
However, the
In the present study, the combined effects of NiSO4 and buprofezin on the induction of embryo
123
toxicity
124
concentration-response analyses with the individual chemicals and computing the prediction of the
125
effects of a 1:1 mixture of the two chemicals by concentration addition (CA) model, we confirmed that
126
NiSO4 and buprofezin acted together to cause synergistic embryo toxicity in zebrafish, even when each
127
one existing at level below its no-observed-effect-concentration (NOEC). Subsequently, we used
128
fluorescence spectrometry to investigate the interaction of these two chemicals and found that NiSO4
129
and buprofezin formed a Ni-buprofezin complex. This complex facilitated uptake of Ni and buprofezin
130
by the embryos after exposure to both and contributed to the combination effects. Finally, using
131
pharmacological interference, we showed that the oxidative mechanism of the complex might underlie
132
the synergistic embryotoxicity of NiSO4 and buprofezin.
133
MATERIALS AND METHODS
in
zebrafish
were
assessed.
Applying
nonlinear
regression
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
to
the
extensive
Page 7 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
134
Chemicals. Nickel sulfate (NiSO4, purity>97%) and buprofezin (purity>99%) were purchased from
135
Sigma-Aldrich Company (Saint Louis, Missouri, America) and Zhenbo Company (Jiangyin City, Jiangsu,
136
China), respectively. All other chemicals used were commercially available appropriate grades. The
137
buprofezin stock solution was prepared by dissolving a weighed amount of buprofezin in dimethyl
138
sulfoxide (DMSO), and then, different exposure concentrations for the embryonic bioassay were
139
obtained by diluting the buprofezin stock solutions into culture medium. The NiSO4 test solution was
140
prepared by dissolving NiSO4 in distilled water to obtain a stock solution and then diluting the stock
141
solution into culture medium immediately before use.
142
Zebrafish Embryo Collection and Exposure. Mature wild-type (AB strain) zebrafish
143
(approximately 8 months old) were maintained at 28 ± 0.5 ℃ in a 14 h light /10 h dark cycle in a
144
continuous flow-through system in charcoal-filtered tap water. The fish were fed twice daily with
145
Artemia nauplii. Zebrafish eggs were obtained from the spawning adults in groups of approximately 20
146
males and 10 females held in tanks overnight. The zebrafish eggs were collected within 4 h of
147
spawning from several breeding tanks, pooled, washed, and then randomly transferred into glass
148
beakers. At 24 h post-fertilization (hpf), we randomly exposed normally developed embryos to Ni at 10,
149
20, 40, 80, 200, 300, 400 and 600 mg/L or buprofezin at 2.5, 10, 40, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 mg/L,
150
respectively. The exposure solution contained 294.0 mg/L CaCl22H2O, 123.3 mg/L MgSO47H2O, 63.0
151
mg/L NaHCO3, and 5.5 mg/L KCl.
152
buprofezin were both at 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 100 mg/L. To inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS)
153
production, the zebrafish embryos were exposed to Ni and buprofezin both at 10 mg/L in the absence
154
and presence of a 2 h pre-treatment with the antioxidant agent Vitamin C (Vc, 250 µmol/L). Embryos
155
were exposed to different treatments in a 24-well multi-plate at 3 embryos/well with 2 mL test solution,
29
In the co-exposure treatments, the concentrations of Ni and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 33
156
and the plates were kept in a humidified incubator at 28 ± 0.5 ℃ under controlled lighting conditions.
157
Both the vehicle control and the treated embryos received the maximum amount of 0.2 % DMSO (v/v),
158
and three independent experiments for each treatment concentration were conducted in triplicate. For a
159
single experiment, each concentration group contained 216 normally developed embryos. The
160
embryos were examined at the end of the exposure period, the survival rate was recorded as the
161
toxicity end point, and mortality was identified by a missing heartbeat, coagulation of the embryos,
162
non-detached tail and failure to develop somites, as previously reported by Du et al.30
163
Detection of ROS Production. According to a previously reported protocol,
31
200 zebrafish
164
embryos were washed twice with cold PBS (pH = 7.4) and then homogenized in 800 µL cold buffer.
165
The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 ℃, and the supernatant was collected.
166
Next, 20 µL of the homogenates were added to the wells of a black 96-well plate(Costar 3925, Corning
167
Incorporated, USA) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. After the incubation, 100 µL PBS and
168
8.3 µL dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCF-DA) stock solution (dissolved in DMSO, 10 mg/mL) were
169
added to each well. The plate was incubated at 37 ℃ for 30 min in the dark. The fluorescence intensity
170
was measured using a microplate reader (Varioskan Flash, Thermo Scientific, America) with excitation
171
and emission at 485 and 530 nm, respectively. The ROS concentration was expressed in arbitrary units
172
(fluorescence units/mg protein).
173
Lipid Peroxidation and Protein Assay. Lipid peroxidation was detected by spectrofluorometric
174
analysis as malondialdehyde (MDA) reacting with thiobarbituric acid to form a colored complex. The
175
embryos were homogenized in cold PBS, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10
176
min at 4 ℃ to precipitate insoluble material. The supernatant was collected to analyze the MDA content
177
using the corresponding reagent kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
178
level of MDA is expressed as nanomoles per milligram protein. Protein levels were estimated by
179
Bradford's method using bovine serum albumin as a standard.32
180
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Release Assay. The culture medium was used to assess LDH
181
release, and the activity was measured according to the protocol of Fontella et al.33 In detail, 100 µL of
182
the medium was transferred to the reaction medium containing 7.5 mmol/L NAD , 260 mmol/L lactate,
183
and
184
1,10-phenanthroline was converted to a colored complex by reacting to NADH, which was determined
185
at 490 nm.
+
1.6
mmol/L
1,10-phenanthroline.
Following
the
conversion
of
lactate
to
pyruvate,
186
Fluorescence Spectral Analysis. A stock solution of buprofezin (10 g/L) was made by dissolving
187
buprofezin in DMSO, sonicated for 5 min, and diluted by double distilled water. For the quenching
188
experiments, the diluted buprofezin solutions and NiSO4 at various concentrations were applied into a
189
measuring flask; and then the system was thoroughly mixed and quantified to 5 mL with double distilled
190
water. The fluorescence intensity of mixtures was detected at 570-630 nm, with excitation wavelength
191
of 300 nm (Cary Eclipse, Agilent Technologies, Australia).
192
Determination of the Ni and Buprofezin Content of Embryos.
For Ni analysis, embryos of
193
each treatment group were washed repeatedly with distilled water and digested overnight. The
194
digestion was completed by microwave-assisted digestion at 185℃ for 20 min (Multiwave 3000, Anton
195
Paar, Australia). After cooling, the residues were transferred to 50 mL flasks and diluted with deionized
196
water. Before analysis, the samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter.34 The Ni contents
197
were eventually measured by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS, AA240FS, Varian, USA).
198
For the buprofezin determination, a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) was applied
199
(TRACE-DSQ, Thermo Scientific, America). A DB-5 MS column of 30 m × 0.25 mm I.D × 0.25 µm film
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
200
thickness was programmed at 100 ℃ for 1 min, and then the temperature was elevated to 300 ℃ at
201
25 ℃/min and kept at 300 ℃ for 4 min. The temperatures of injection port and transfer line from GC to
202
MS were kept at 250 ℃. The samples were automaticly introduced in splitless mode (t = 1 min), with a
203
helium carrier gas flow of 1 mL/min. The EI was operated at 70 eV. The full scan mode ranged from m/z
204
40 to 400. The ion source temperature was 250 ℃. The embryos were ultrasonically extracted (VWR
205
ultrasonic bath, Filtrafine, Spain) with chloroform, and the extract was concentrated for 5 min in a rotary
206
evaporator. Following this, the extract was dissolved in 1 mL of chloroform and dried under a gentle
207
stream of N2. Finally, the extract was dissolved in 10 mL of chloroform, and 1 µL was injected into the
208
GC-MS. Based on the data from the FAAS and GC-MS, we obtained the concentration of Ni and
209
buprofezin of total embryos. The mass of Ni and buprofezin contained in each embryo was calculated
210
from the measured concentration of the aliquots and the dilution factor according to previous
211
literature.35 In detail, the Ni or buprofezin content of the embryo was calculated using the following
212
equation: M
213
were the concentration of the Ni or buprofezin of total embryos from FAAS and GC-MS, the final
214
volume and the total number of embryos, respectively.
215
= CV N . In this equation, M was the Ni or buprofezin content of the embryo; C, V, and N
Concentration-response Analysis. Based on the scatter plots of embryo mortality ratio versus 36
216
concentration and previously reported “best fit” approach,
217
analyses using suitable regression models, such as Hill and Langmuir models, etc. Also, we calculated
218
the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated mean effects. Table S1 showed a complication of the
219
nonlinear regression models applied in present study, and the NOEC of the individual chemicals and
220
mixtures were estimated using the Dunnett test.36
221
we conducted concentration-response
Calculation of Predicted Mixture Effects. We prepared mixtures at a mixture ratio of 1:1 and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 33
Page 11 of 33
Environmental Science & Technology
222
then treated the embryos with serial dilutions of a master solution. Then, we calculated the predicted
223
combination effects over a range of concentrations using CA model. The model assumes that the
224
combination effect of a mixture with n components is concentration additive, therefore, the following
225
formula is used for calculating the mixture effects.37-42
226
ECxmix = [∑ pi / ECxi ]−1 [1]
227
In this equation, pi is the relative proportion of substance i expressed as a fraction of the total
228
concentration of substances in the mixture. The effect concentrations ECxi were computed using the
229
inverse expression of the proper regression functions from the concentration response function of
230
individual components i (Table S1).
231
Statistical Analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the mean
232
differences among groups compared to the vehicle control. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to
233
analyze experimental data between two groups. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. p