Chemoenzymatic Asymmetric Total Syntheses of Antitumor Agents

Synthesis, structure and catalytic properties of [Ru(dppp)2(CH3CN)Cl][BPh4] and .... Sandra F. Mayer, Andreas Steinreiber, Romano V. A. Orru, Kurt Fab...
0 downloads 0 Views 268KB Size
Download PDF
VOLUME 67, NUMBER 26

DECEMBER 27, 2002

© Copyright 2002 by the American Chemical Society

Chemoenzymatic Asymmetric Total Syntheses of Antitumor Agents (3R,9R,10R)- and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol and (R)- and (S)-Falcarinol from Panax ginseng Using an Enantioconvergent Enzyme-Triggered Cascade Reaction Sandra F. Mayer,† Andreas Steinreiber,† Romano V. A. Orru,‡ and Kurt Faber*,† Department of Chemistry, Organic & Bioorganic Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 28, A-8010 Graz, Austria and Division of Chemistry, Bio-organic Chemistry, Vrije University, de Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] Received January 30, 2002

Total asymmetric synthesis of two components of Panax ginseng showing antitumor activity, i.e., (3R,9R,10R)- and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol and of both enantiomers of Falcarinol was accomplished. Due to the fact that the synthetic strategy was based on enantioconvergent biotransformations, the occurrence of any undesired stereoisomer was entirely avoided. The absolute configuration of naturally occurring Panaxytriol was confirmed to be (3R,9R,10R) on the basis of optical rotation values. It was shown that enzyme-triggered cascade reactions represent a valuable tool for the synthesis of natural products. Introduction The roots of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer have been employed in Asia for many centuries, as an analeptic, stomachic, and erythropoietic agent.1 The crude extract of Panax ginseng forms part of a traditional oriental medicine in Japan and is presently available as a commercial medicinal formulation.2 Many types of polyacetylenic compounds, including Panaxytriol (1) and both enantiomers of Falcarinol [(R)-3 and (S)-3] suppress the in vitro growth of cultured tumor cells (Figure 1).3 These compounds also exhibit strong neurotoxicity, antifungal activity, and cytotoxic activity against leukemia cells (L1210) in tissue cultures. Panaxytriol (1) also suppresses the growth of B-16 melanoma transplanted into mice and shows stimulative effects on the antitumor activity of mitomycin-C in cultured tumor cells. Both enantiomers of Falcarinol [(R)-3 and (S)-3], also named Panaxynol, have been isolated from different plants. Until 1999, its absolute configuration was not clear, and conflicting data * Corresponding author: Telephone: +43-316-380-5332. Fax: +43316-380-9840. † University of Graz. ‡ Vrije University. (1) Saito, T.; Matsunaga, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Nagumo, F.; Fujito, H.; Mori, M.; Katano, M. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 17, 798. (2) Matsunaga, H.; Katano, M.; Yamamoto, H.; Mori, M.; Takata, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 1279. (3) Matsunaga, H.; Katano, M.; Saita, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Mori, M. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1994, 33, 291.

FIGURE 1. Antitumor components of Panax ginseng.

were reported, using CD exitation and Moshers method for its determination.4,5 To confirm the absolute configuration, Cai et al. explored for the first time the enantioselective total synthesis of both enantiomers.6 They confirmed that (+)-Falcarinol possesses the (3S)-configuration. Panaxytriol (1) was isolated as a characteristic (4) Shim, S. C.; Koh, H. Y.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5775. (5) Bernart, M. W.; Hallock, Y. F.; Cardellina, J. H., II; Boyd, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 993. (6) Zheng, G.; Lu, W.; Aisa, H. A.; Cai, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2181.

10.1021/jo020073w CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society

Published on Web 06/11/2002

J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9115-9121

9115

Mayer et al. SCHEME 2. Synthesis of Building Block 5 via Deracemization

FIGURE 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of Panaxytriol. SCHEME 1. Enantioconvergent Enzyme-Triggered Cascade Reaction

constituent of red ginseng in 1983, and its chemical structure was elucidated in 1987.7,8 Its absolute configuration was determined to be (3R,9R,10R).9 To date, only three studies on the asymmetric synthesis of naturally occurring Panaxytriol have been published.10-12 However, the absolute configuration is still unclear due to conflicting data. Furthermore, all syntheses suffer from long reaction sequences. In this report, we describe a concise short synthesis of (3R,9R,10R)- and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol (1 and 2) using a chemoenzymatic approach. Our synthetic strategy was based on two main building blocks, i.e., epoxy-alcohol (2R,3R)-4 and the sec-alcohol 5 (Figure 2). We envisaged that the former could easily be prepared via a biocatalytic enantioconvergent cascade reaction recently developed by us (Scheme 1).13 Thus, when cis-configured rac-halomethyl-oxiranes of type 6 were subjected to the action of a bacterial epoxide hydrolase, both enantiomers were transformed through opposite regioselective pathways in an enantioconvergent fashion to furnish a single enantiomeric vic-diol [(2S,3R7)] as the sole product.14 Due to the presence of a halohydrin moiety, the latter underwent spontaneous ring-closure to yield epoxy-alcohol (2R,3R)-8 as the final product in excellent de and ee. This latter reaction shows some resemblance to a Payne-type rearrangement.16 (7) Kitagawa, I.; Yoshikawa, M.; Yoshihara, M.; Hayashi, T.; Taniyama, T. Yakugaku Zasshi 1983, 103, 612. (8) Kitagawa, I.; Taniyama, T.; Shibuya, H.; Noda, T.; Yoshikawa, M. Yakugaku Zasshi 1987, 107, 495. (9) Kobayashi, M.; Mahmud, T.; Umezome, T.; Wang, W.; Murakami, N., Kitagawa, I. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15691. (10) Satoh, M.; Takeuchi, N.; Fujimoto, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 1114. (11) Lu, W.; Zheng, G.; Gao, D.; Cai, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 7157. (12) Gurjar, M. K.; Kumar, V. S.; Rao, B. V. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12563. (13) Mayer, S. F.; Steinreiber, A.; Orru, R. V. A.; Faber, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 41. (14) Kroutil, W.; Mischitz, M.; Faber, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3629. (15) Mayer, S. F.; Steinreiber, A.; Orru, R. V. A.; Faber, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 4537. (16) Mayer, S. F.; Kroutil, W.; Faber, K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 332.

9116 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002

Overall, this sequence represented an enzyme-catalyzed cascade reaction.13,15,16 Due to the enantioconvergence, chemical yields were markedly beyond the 50% limitation set for kinetic resolutions. Such ‘deracemization’ processes have recently gained considerably attention due to their improved economic balance.17 The synthetic elegance of this process prompted us to utilize it for a synthesis of Panaxytriol (1 and 2). For the second building block (5), the application of lipase technology was obvious to obtain nonracemic material. To circumvent the drawbacks of kinetic resolution, we employed an in situ inversion to obtain (R)- and (S)-5 in an enantioconvergent fashion without loss of material.18 In addition, an asymmetric synthesis of both enantiomers of Falcarinol [(R)-3 and (S)-3] was accomplished by using this strategy. Results and Discussion Asymmetric Synthesis of the C(1)-C(7) Segment 5. Alcohol rac-5 was prepared from 1,4-dichloro-2-butyne (9) (Scheme 2) by lithiation of the dichloro-acetylene 9 using n-BuLi in liquid ammonia and addition of acrolein to furnish rac-5 in 29% yield (not optimized). Acetate raccis-10 as reference material for the biotransformation was prepared according to literature procedures.19 Both enantiomers of 5 were obtained in nonracemic form via Candida antarctica lipase B-catalyzed kinetic resolution via acyl-transfer [for (R)-5] or ester hydrolysis of rac-10 [for (S)-5]. Both kinetic resolution processes were linked to an in situ inversion in order to avoid the occurrence of an undesired stereoisomer. Thus, (R)-5 or (S)-5 were obtained in >98% ee from the racemate in 82 and 80% yield, respectively.20,21 (17) Faber, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5005. (18) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1. (19) Steinreiber, A.; Edegger, K.; Mayer, S. F.; Faber, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2067.

Enantioconvergent Enzyme-Triggered Cascade Reaction SCHEME 3.

Synthesis of (R)- and (S)-Falcarinol

Synthesis of the C(8)-C(17) Segment 13 and Asymmetric Synthesis of Both Enantiomers of Falcarinol (3). Alcohol 11 was selectively hydrogenated with Lindlar catalyst to give the corresponding cis-alkene 12 in 86% yield (Scheme 3). To achieve absolute cisselectivity, poisoning of the Lindlar catalyst with quinoline alone was not sufficient (trans/cis-isomer ) 1:7), but required the addition of KOH. Halogenation of the hydroxyl group of 12 via Appel conditions (PPh3/CCl4) gave chloride 13 in 81% yield.22 In the last step, 13 was coupled to alcohol (R)- or (S)-5 using K2CO3, Bu4N+Cl-, and CuI, furnishing Falcarinol (3) in both enantiomeric forms.23 Thus, (S)-3 and (R)-3 were synthesized over five steps in an overall yield of 12 and 11%. The absolute configuration of 3 was confirmed by comparison with known optical rotation values.6 The absolute configuration of (R)-5 and (S)-5 was deduced from that of the final products (R)-3 and (S)-3, since the configuration at C-3 remained untouched. In addition, these results are in accordance with the ‘Kazlauskas-rule’, which predicts the stereopreference of lipases for sec-alcohols.24 Asymmetric Synthesis of the C(8)-C(17) Segment (2R,3R)-4 via Enzyme-Triggered Enantioconvergent Cascade Reaction and Synthesis of Two Diastereoisomers of Panaxytriol (3R,9R,10R)-1 and (3S,9R,10R)-2. The key substrate for the biocatalytic step with bacterial epoxide hydrolases (BEH) was epoxide raccis-14 (Scheme 4), which was synthesized by epoxidation of alkene 13 with Oxone in 84% yield. For the identification of the expected biotransformation product, rac-4 was synthesized as reference material. Acid-catalyzed epoxide opening of rac-cis-14 gave rac-cis-15, which subjected to ring-closure by NaH to give epoxy-alcohol rac-cis-4. (20) Alternatively, a highly efficient dynamic resolution of rac-5 was tested using combined C. antarctica lipase B-catalyzed acyl transfer (4-chlorophenyl acetate as acyl donor) with Ru-catalyzed in-situ racemization of the nonreacting substrate enantiomer to furnish (R)10. However, this protocol failed since no racemization was observed due to the inactivity of the Ru catalyst [Ru2(CO)4(µ-H)(C4Ph4COHOCC4Ph4)] on this substrate. (21) Persson, B. A.; Larsson, A. L. E.; Ray, M. L.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1645. (22) Appel, R. Angew. Chem. 1975, 87, 863. (23) Jeffery, T.; Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2225. (24) Kazlauskas, R. J.; Weissfloh, A. N. E.; Rappaport, A. T.; Cuccia, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2656.

SCHEME 4. Synthesis of (3R,9R,10R)- and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol

Substrate rac-cis-14 was screened for biohydrolysis in Tris-buffer at pH 8.0 using resting cells of a range of bacteria known to possess strong secondary metabolic activity and epoxide hydrolase activity, in particular Actinomyces spp. Under screening conditions it was verified that in the absence of biocatalyst no spontaneous hydrolysis of rac-cis-14 was observed within the anticipated reaction time of ∼150 h. We were pleased to see that hydrolysis of rac-cis-14 furnished the corresponding diol 15, and that the latter intermediate (detected at low concentration 99% ee, except for Rhodococcus sp. NCIMB 11216, which produced the mirror-image counterpart (2S,3S)-4 albeit in low optical purity (entry 7). Several data sets of c, eeS, eeI, and eeP clearly indicated that the transformation does not follow a kinetic resolution pathway, which is most striking for entry 1. Although Streptomyces lavendulae ATCC 55209 (entry 6) showed good stereoselectivity, but the conversion was too low for preparative applications. To provide sufficient material of 4 for the asymmetric syntheses of 1 and 2, Streptomyces sp. FCC008 was chosen for the preparative-scale biotransformation. Thus, J. Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002 9117

Mayer et al. TABLE 1. Biocatalytic Enantioconvergent Transformation of Chloroalkyl-oxirane rac-cis-14 biocatalyst

substratea ees [%]

intermediatebeeI [%]

product eeP [%]

conversionc,d [%]

Streptomyces sp. FCC008 Rhodococcus equi IFO 3730 Mycobacterium paraffinicum NCIMB 10420 Rhodococcus sp. R 312 (CBS 717.73) Rhodococcus ruber DSM 44540 Streptomyces lavendulae ATCC 55209 Rhodococcus sp. NCIMB 11216

47 13 80 13 90 39 21

>99 (2S,3R) 65 (2S,3R) 53 (2S,3R) 45 (2S,3R) 30 (2S,3R) 97 (2S,3R) 28 (2R,3S)

>99 (2R,3R) 67 (2R,3R) 52 (2R,3R) 47 (2R,3R) 32 (2R,3R) 98 (2R,3R) 31 (2S,3S)

78 69 75 25 79 18 35

entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

a Absolute configuration of the oxirane was not determined due to its low concentration toward the end of the enantioconvergent biotransformation. b Absolute configuration of intermediate was deduced from that of the product based on the SN2-type mechanism of ring closure.13 c Conversion based on nonreacted substrate: c ) [substrate] - ([intermediate] + [product]). d After 146 h.

conversion of substrate rac-cis-14 (0.85 g) in Tris-buffer (pH 8.0) gave (2R,3R)-4 in 92% yield, 99% de and 95% ee as the sole product (Scheme 4). Protection of the free hydroxy moiety in substrate (2R,3R)-4 with TBDMSCl afforded (2R,3R)-16 in 89% yield. The last step in the synthesis of 1 and 2 consisted of the coupling of (2R,3R)-16 and (S)- or (R)-5, respectively (Figure 2). This was accomplished by treatment of (R)- or (S)-5, respectively, with n-BuLi in THF at -78 °C and subsequent addition of HMPA and (2R,3R)-16, followed by deprotection of the silyl ether using Bu4N+F-. Thus the synthesis of (3R,9R,10R)-1 {[R]20 D -19.5 (c 0.83, CHCl3)} and (3S,9R,10R)-2 {[R]20 D +24.3 (c 1.10, CHCl3)} was completed over eight steps in an overall yield of 8% and 7%, respectively. Due to the fact that conflicting data for the optical rotation of the key building block 4 were published, the determination of its absolute configuration was a difficult task. The optical rotation of the biotransformation product was in good accordance with one of the published values for the (2R,3R)-enantiomer {[R]20 D -5.2 (c 0.67, 12 25 which is in acCHCl3), [R]20 -5.6 (c 1.8, CHCl ) }, 3 D cordance with [R]20D +1.7 (c 1.2, CH2Cl2) for the (2S,3S)enantiomer.26 In contrast, somewhat dubious datas inasmuch both enantiomers show almost the same positive rotation ([R]20 D +3.4 (c 1.0, CHCl3) for the +3.5 (c 1.0, CHCl3) for the (2S,3S)(2R,3R)- and [R]20 D enantiomer)swere reported.11 Overall, it seems clear that the (2S,3S)-4 has a positive12 and the (2R,3R)-4 a negative sign of optical rotation. To obtain an unambiguous proof, (2R,3R)-4 was independently synthesized by following a known procedure (Scheme 5).27 Thus, reduction of alkyne 11 with LiAlH4 gave (E)hydroxyalkene 17, which was halogenated using Appel conditions to furnish compound 18. Asymmetric dihydroxylation of the latter using AD-Mix-β and treatment of the halodiol with NaH afforded (2R,3R)-4 in 84% ee. This material showed an expected value of [R]20 D -4.5 (c 1.25, CHCl3). These data unambiguously prove that the absolute configuration of the biotransformation product using Streptomyces sp. FCC008 is (2R,3R)-4. Conclusion In summary, we have demonstrated that enzymetriggered cascade reactions represent a valuable tool for (25) In the same paper, the rotation of the (2S,3S)-enantiomer was reported to be [R]20 D +3.9 (c 1.42, CHCl3). (26) Soulie, J.; Boyer, T.; Lallemand, J. Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 625. (27) Vanhessche, K. P. M.; Wang, Z.-M.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3469.

9118 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002

SCHEME 5. (2R,3R)-4

Synthesis of Reference Material

the synthesis of natural products. Thus, the total synthesis of components of Panax ginseng showing antitumor activity, such as (3R,9R,10R)- and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol, as well as both enantiomers of Falcarinol, was accomplished. On the basis of the employment of enantioconvergent biocatalytic synthetic strategies, the occurrence of any undesired stereoisomer was entirely avoided. Since for naturally occurring Panaxytriol reported optical rotation values range from [R]20 D -18 to -25.4, we can confirm its (3R,9R,10R)-configuration on the basis of our data {[R]20 D -19.5}.

Experimental Section General. 1H NMR (500, 360 or 200 MHz) and 13C NMR (125, 90 or 50 MHz) spectra were obtained from solutions in CDCl3, and chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm, δ) downfield from the internal standard (TMS). TLC plates were run on silica gel 60 (F254), and compounds were visualized by spraying with Mo reagent [(NH4)6Mo7O24‚ 4H2O (100 g/L), Ce(SO4)2‚4H2O(4 g/L) in H2SO4 (10%)] (detection I) or by dipping into a KMnO4 reagent [2.5 g/L KMnO4 in H2O] (detection II). Compounds were purified either by flash chromatography on silica gel or, for volatile substances, by Kugelrohr distillation. Enantioselective gas chromatography was conducted using a permethylated β-cyclodextrin column (column A, 25 m, 0.32 mm, 0.25 µm film) or propionated γ-cyclodextrin column (column B, 30 m, 0.25 mm). H2 was used as carrier gas. For detailed analytical data vide infra. High resolution mass spectra and optical rotation values were obtained as previously reported.15,19 Solvents were dried and freshly distilled by common practice. All reactions were performed under argon atmosphere, unless otherwise stated. Organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, and then the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Lindlar catalyst [Pd on CaCO3 (5% w/w)] poisoned with Pb was used. For biotransformations, lyophilized bacterial cells were used. The bacteria were obtained from culture collections; FCC numbers refer to the Fab-Crew-Collection at

Enantioconvergent Enzyme-Triggered Cascade Reaction this institute. All strains were grown as previously described.15 Lipase from C. antarctica B (SP 525, Batch: PPW 5328) was kindly donated by Novo (DK), and Ru-catalyst [Ru2(CO)4(µH)(C4Ph4COHOCC4Ph4)] was obtained through courtesy of J.E. Ba¨ckvall (Stockholm University). Syntheses of Substrates and Reference Materials. racHept-1-ene-4,6-diyn-3-ol (rac-5). To a vigorously stirred suspension of LiNH2 (5.62 g, 245 mmol) in liquid ammonia (350 mL) at -50 °C was added a catalytic amount of Fe(NO3)3, which was followed by dropwise addition of 1,4-dichloro-2butyne 9 (10 g, 81.3 mmol) over a period of 1 h. Subsequently, acrolein (5 g, 89.2 mmol, used as received) was added. After 2 h, stirring was stopped, and the reaction was quenched by addition of H2O (150 mL), solid NH4Cl (20 g), and Et2O (200 mL). Ammonia was allowed to evaporate over a period of 16 h. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic phases were washed with sat. NaHCO3 (100 mL), dried, and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to give rac-5 (2.5 g, 29%) as a pale yellow liquid. GC-data: Column B [10 psi, H2, 65 °C (iso), tR1 ) 59.2 min (3S), tR2 ) 60.3 min (3R)]. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.74, (detection I); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 2.25 (1H, s), 2.51 (1H, s), 4.93 (1H, d, J ) 4.2), 5.28 (1H, d, J ) 10.5), 5.49 (1H, d, J ) 17.4), 5.89-5.98 (1H, m). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 63.7, 67.7, 69.5, 70.8, 75.2, 117.9, 136.1.28 rac-3-Acetoxyhept-1-ene-4,6-diyne (rac-10). To a stirred solution of alcohol rac-5 (0.5 g, 4.7 mmol) in Ac2O (10 mL) were added NEt3 (0.7 g, 7.1 mmol) and DMAP (15 mg, cat.). The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. After the reaction was complete, it was quenched by addition of water (10 mL) and Et2O (50 mL). After phase separation, the organic phase was dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to give rac-10 (0.6 g, 91%) as a pale yellow liquid. GCdata: column A [10 psi, H2, 75 °C (iso), tR1 ) 6.6 min (3R), tR2 ) 6.8 min (3S)]. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.91, (detection I); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 2.12 (3H, s), 2.24 (1H, s), 5.37 (1H, d, J ) 9.7), 5.56 (1H, d, J ) 16.1), 5.825.92 (2H, m). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 20.8, 64.2, 67.2, 69.2, 71.0, 71.4, 119,9, 131.9, 169.4. HRMS (C9H7O2): calcd 147.0446 [M - H]+; found 147.0432 [M - H]+. (R)-Hept-1-ene-4,6-diyn-3-ol [(R)-5] via Biocatalytic In Situ Inversion. Lipase from C. antarctica B (150 mg) was dispersed in hexane (25 mL), and after addition of rac-5 (0.9 g, 8.5 mmol) and vinyl acetate (2.0 g, 23.2 mmol), the mixture was agitated on an orbit shaker (rt, 120 rpm). The reaction was monitored by GC on a chiral stationary phase. When the conversion had reached ∼50% (3 h), the biocatalyst was filtered, and the solution was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in anhydrous THF (100 mL), and AcOH (1.1 g, 18.6 mmol), PPh3 (4.0 g, 15.2 mmol), and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (2.6 g, 12.9 mmol) were added. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 1 h to yield crude (R)-10 (ee > 99%). Without further isolation, the reaction mixture was diluted with H2SO4 (5%, 80 mL) and heated to 80 °C for 3 h. After neutralization with a sat. NaHCO3 solution (150 mL) and extraction with Et2O (3 × 60 mL), the organic phase was dried and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to give (R)-5 (0.74 g, 82%) ee >99%. [R]20 D -58.5 (c 0.65, CHCl3). (S)-Hept-1-ene-4,6-diyn-3-ol [(S)-5] via Biocatalytic In Situ Inversion. C. antarctica B lipase (90 mg) was dissolved in Na2HPO4 buffer (70 mL, 50 mM, pH 7.5), and rac-10 (0.85 g, 5.7 mmol) was added. The reaction was monitored by GC on a chiral stationary phase. When the conversion had reached ∼50% (30 min), the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 40 mL), and the organic phase was dried and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was treated with AcOH (6.1 g, 11.4 (28) HRMS and elemental analysis data could not be obtained due to polymerization.

mmol), PPh3 (2.4 g, 9.1 mmol), and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (1.7 g, 8.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF (50 mL) as described above to yield (S)-10 in ee ) 98% after 1 h. Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis was complete after 4 h and workup was performed as described above. Flash chromatography (petroleum ether/ EtOAc, 5:1) gave (S)-5 (0.49 g, 81%) ee ) 98%. [R]20 D +56.4 (c 1.14, CHCl3). (Z)-2-Decen-1-ol 12. To a solution of alkyne 11 (10 g, 64.8 mmol) in EtOH (50 mL), quinoline (2 mL)were added a cat. amount of KOH and Lindlar catalyst (2 g), and the resulting mixture was vigorously stirred under H2 for 16 h at atmospheric pressure. Then the solids were removed by filtration through a plug of Celite-545, and the solvent was evaporated. Flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 7:1) gave 12 as a colorless liquid (8.7 g, 86%). Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.75, (detection I); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.87 (3H, t, J ) 6.7), 1.27-1.37 (10H, m), 1.64 (1H, m), 2.06 (2H, q, J ) 6.6), 4.20 (2H, d, J ) 10.4), 5.51-5.60 (2H, m). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.1, 22.7, 27.5, 29.2, 29.3, 29.7, 31.9, 58.6, 128.4, 133.2. (Z)-1-Chloro-2-decene 13. PPh3 (16 g, 61.0 mmol) and alcohol 12 (8.5 g, 54.4 mmol) were dissolved in CCl4 (50 mL) without Ar atmosphere. The reaction was complete after stirring for 16 h at 80 °C. The solution was concentrated, and pentane (50 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. After flash chromatography (petroleum ether) chloroalkene 13 (7.7 g, 81%) was isolated as a colorless liquid. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.95, (detection II); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.90 (3H, t, J ) 6.6), 1.29-1.44 (10H, m), 2.12 (2H, q, J ) 6.7), 4.10 (2H, d, J ) 6.8), 5.59-5.68 (2H, m). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.3, 22.8, 27.3, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 32.0, 39.7, 125.4, 135.7. (S)-Falcarinol (S)-3. To a stirred solution of (S)-5 (0. 16 g, 1.51 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (10 mL) were added Bu4N+Cl(0.05 g, 0.18 mmol), K2CO3 (0.26 g, 1.88 mmol), and CuI (0.02 g, 0.11 mmol). After the mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature, chloroalkene 13 (0.28 g, 1.60 mmol), dissolved in DMF (2 mL), was added dropwise within 15 min. The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for further 7 h. After the reaction was complete, it was quenched with water (15 mL) and Et2O (50 mL). After phase separation, the organic phase was dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 7:1) to give (S)-3 (0.27 g, 73%) as a colorless liquid. [R]20 D +31.4 (c 1.12, CHCl3), which is in good agreement with literature data 6 [R]20 D +33.8 (c 0.53, CHCl3). Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) ) 0.37 (detection I); 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.89 (3H, t, J ) 6.7), 1.28-1.36 (10H, m), 1.93 (1H, d, J ) 6.6), 2.02 (2H, q, J ) 7.1), 3.03 (2H, d, J ) 6.9), 4.91 (1H, t, J ) 5.6), 5.24 (1H, d, J ) 5.1), 5.35-5.52 (3H, m), 5.91-5.98 (1H, m). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.0, 17.6, 22.5, 27.1, 29.04, 29.08, 29.13, 31.7, 63.3, 63.9, 71.2, 74.1, 80.2, 116.9, 121.9, 133.0, 136.1. NMR data match those previously reported.9 HRMS (C17H24O1): calcd. 244.1827 [M]+; found 244.1824 [M]+. (R)-Falcarinol (R)-3. Following the procedure described above for (S)-3, alcohol (R)-5 (0. 19 g, 1.8 mmol) was treated with anhydrous DMF (15 mL), Bu4N+Cl- (0.06 g, 0.22 mmol), K2CO3 (0.3 g, 2.2 mmol), CuI (0.02 g, 0.11 mmol), and chloroalkene 13 (0.33 g, 1.89 mmol) to afford (R)-3 (0.30 g, 69%) as a colorless liquid after flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 10:1). [R]20 D -35.3 (c 1.45, CHCl3) is in good 6 agreement with literature data [R]20 D -36.6 (c 0.92, CHCl3). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra and mass spectra matched those described above for (S)-3. cis-1-Chloro-2,3-epoxydecane rac-cis-14. To a solution of alkene 13 (3 g, 17.2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (80 mL), acetone (80 mL), and H2O (20 mL) were added a cat. amount of 18-crown-6 and a solution of Oxone (15.9 g, 25.9 mmol) in H2O (60 mL) at 4 °C without argon atmosphere. After 16 h the reaction was complete, and the organic phase was separated from the

J. Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002 9119

Mayer et al. aqueous phase. After extraction of the aqueous layer with CH2Cl2 (3 × 50 mL), the combined organic phase was dried and evaporated. Kugelrohr distillation gave rac-cis-14 (2.75 g, 84%) as a colorless liquid. GC-data: Column A [10 psi, H2, 135 °C (iso), tR1 ) 3.2 min, tR2 ) 3.3 min]. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 2:1) ) 0.83, (detection I); bp20mbar (Kugelrohr): 130-135 °C; 1 H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.89 (3H, s), 1.29-1.54 (12H, m), 3.06 (1H, s), 3.21-3.25 (1H, m), 3.45-3.51 (1H, m), 3.65-3.70 (1H, m). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.2, 22.8, 26.6, 27.6, 29.3, 29.5, 31.9, 41.7, 55.9, 58,2. HRMS (C10H19O1Cl): calcd 191.1124 [M]+; found 190.1147 [M]+ and HRMS (C10H19O1): calcd 155.1436 [M - Cl]+; found 155.1427 [M Cl]+. threo-1-Chloro-2,3-decanediol rac-cis-15. Epoxide raccis-14 (0.5 g, 2.6 mmol) was hydrolyzed in a mixture of water (5 mL) and THF (5 mL) under acidic conditions (6 N H2SO4, 20 drops) without argon atmosphere. After 5 h the reaction was complete. The solution was extracted twice with EtOAc (20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to afford rac-cis-15 (0.13 g, 87%). GC-data: Column A [10 psi, H2, 135 °C (iso), tR1 ) 22.2 min (2R,3S), tR2 ) 24.0 min (2S,3R)]. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) ) 0.16, (detection I); 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.88 (3H, t, J ) 6.6), 1.24-1.55 (12H, m), 3.60-3.68 (3H, m), 4.12 (1H, q, J ) 7.1). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 13.3, 21.9, 24.8, 28.5, 28.7, 31.0, 33.0, 46.1, 70.8, 73.0. HRMS (C10H20O2Cl): calcd 207.1152 [M - H]+; found 207.1157 [M H]+. cis-1,2-Epoxy-3-decanol rac-cis-4. Diol rac-cis-15 (0.11 g, 0.53 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF (5 mL), and NaH (1 mmol) was added. After 30 min, water (10 mL) was added carefully. The solution was extracted three times with Et2O (20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 8:1) to afford rac-cis-4 (0.079 g, 87%) as a colorless liquid. GC-data: Column A [10 psi, H2, 135 °C (iso), tR1 ) 4.2 min (2S,3S), tR2 ) 4.3 min (2R,3R)]. Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.74, (detection I); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.89 (3H, t, J ) 6.6), 1.29-1.63 (12H, m), 1.87 (1H, d, J ) 5.7), 2.71-2.74 (1H, m), 2.83 (1H, t, J ) 4.9), 2.99 (1H, q, J ) 4), 3.42-3.48 (1H, m). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.1, 22.7, 25.3, 29.2, 29.6, 31.8, 34.5, 45.2, 55.4, 71.7. HRMS (C10H19O2): calcd 171.1385 [M - H]+; found 171.1381 [M - H]+. (2R,3R)-1,2-Epoxy-3-decanol (2R,3R)-4 via Biotransformation. Lyophilized whole cells of Streptomyces sp. FCC008 (7 g) were rehydrated in Tris buffer (350 mL, pH 8.0, 50 mM) for 1 h, and epoxide rac-cis-14 (0.85 g, 4.46 mmol) was added in one portion. The reaction was monitored by GC on a chiral stationary phase. After shaking the mixture at 30 °C for 156 h, the reaction was complete, and the product was continuously extracted with CH2Cl2 (400 mL) for 24 h. The organic phase was dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 8:1) to give (2R,3R)-4 (0.71 g, 92%, ee ) 95%) as a colorless liquid. [R]20 D -5.2 (c 0.67, CHCl3), which is consistent with literature data [R]20 D -5.6 (c 1.8, CHCl3)12 (2R,3R)-3-tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy-1,2-epoxydecane (2R,3R)-16. A solution of alcohol (2R,3R)-4 (0.68 g, 4.0 mmol), TBDMSCl (0.9 g, 5.9 mmol), and imidazole (0.4 g, 5.9 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was stirred at room temperature overnight and poured into a mixture of sat. NaHCO3 and CH2Cl2. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 min, the layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic phases were dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether) to afford (2R,3R)-16 (1.01 g, 89%). [R]20 D +5.9 (c 1.38, CHCl3). Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 3:1) ) 0.89, (detection I); 1 H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.07 (3H, s), 0.13 (3H, s), 0.90 (3H, t, J ) 7.1), 0.92 (9H, s), 1.29-1.56 (12H, m), 2.56 (1H, dd, J ) 4.9, 2.7), 2.79 (1H, t, J ) 4.9), 2.91-2.94 (1H, m),

9120 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002

3.27 (1H, q, J ) 6.5).11 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) -5.0, -4.3, 14.1, 18.2, 22.7, 25.3, 25.9, 29.3, 29.7, 31.9, 34,8, 44.9, 56.0, 74.7. HRMS (C15H31O2Si): calcd 271.2093 [M - CH3]+; found 271.2093 [M - CH3]+. (3R,9R,10R)-Heptadec-1-ene-4,6-diyne-3,9,10-triol, (3R, 9R,10R)-Panaxytriol, (3R,9R,10R)-1. To a stirred solution of (R)-5 (0.11 g, 1.04 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added n-BuLi (0.85 mL of a 2.5 M solution in hexane, 2.08 mmol) at -78 °C. After 30 min, HMPA (3 mL) and a solution of (2R,3R)16 (0.33 g, 1.14 mmol) in THF (5 mL) were added dropwise at -78 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 3 h at 80 °C. The reaction was quenched by addition of H2O (30 mL) and Et2O (40 mL). The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried and evaporated. The residue was dissolved in THF (10 mL), and Bu4N+F- (0.36 g, 1.14 mmol) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was quenched with water (10 mL) and Et2O (20 mL). The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic phases were dried and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 10:1) to afford (3R,9R,10R)-1 (0.19 g, 68%). [R]20 D -19.5 (c 0.83, CHCl3). Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.35, (detection I); 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.90 (3H, t, J ) 7.1), 1.27-1.54 (12H, m), 2.02 (2H, s), 2.38 (1H, s), 2.58-2.64 (2H, m), 3.56-3.65 (2H, m), 4.94 (1H, d, J ) 4.5), 5.27 (1H, d, J ) 10.2), 5.46 (1H, d, J ) 17.1), 5.96 (1H, ddd, J ) 17.0, 10.1, 5.5). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.1, 22.6, 25.0, 25.5, 29.2, 29.5, 31.7, 33.6, 63.5, 66.5, 70.9, 72.1, 73.0, 74.7, 78.1, 117.2, 136.0.12 HRMS (C17H24O2): calcd 260.1776 [M - H2O]+; found 260.1775 [M - H2O]+. (3S,9R,10R)-Heptadec-1-ene-4,6-diyne-3,9,10-triol, (3S, 9R,10R)-Panaxytriol, (3S,9R,10R)-2. According to the procedure described above for (3R,9R,10R)-1, alcohol (S)-5 (0.09 g, 0.85 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was treated with n-BuLi (0.70 mL of a 2.5 M solution in hexane, 1.7 mmol), with HMPA (2 mL) and a solution of (2R,3R)-16 (0.27 g, 0.94 mmol) in THF (4 mL), and finally with Bu4N+F- (0.30 g, 0.94 mmol) to afford (3S,9R,10R)-2 (0.14 g, 59%) after flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 10:1). [R]20 D +24.3 (c 1.10, CHCl3), which is consistent with literature [R]20 D +25.3 (c 3.9, CHCl3).12 Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.38, (detection I); 1H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.89 (3H, t, J ) 6.9), 1.20-1.50 (12H, m), 2.18 (3H, bs), 2.57-2.61 (2H, m), 3.723.78 (2H, m), 4.93 (1H, d, J ) 5.5), 5.27 (1H, d, J ) 10.1), 5.48 (1H, d, J ) 16.5), 5.95 (1H, ddd, J ) 17.0, 10.0, 5.4). 13C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.1, 22.6, 25.0, 25.5, 29.2, 29.5, 31.7, 33.6, 63.5, 66.5, 70.9, 72.1, 73.0, 74.7, 78.1, 117.2, 136.0. HRMS (C17H24O2): calcd. 260.1776 [M - H2O]+; found 260.1775 [M-H2O]+. General Procedure for the Screening for Biocatalytic Activity of rac-cis-14. Epoxide rac-cis-14 (5 µL) was hydrolyzed using rehydrated lyophilized cells (50 mg) in Tris-buffer (1 mL, 0.05 M, pH 8.0) by shaking the mixture at 30 °C with 120 rpm. The reactions were monitored by TLC and GC. After 146 h, the cells were removed by centrifugation, and products were extracted with EtOAc (2 × 1 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and analyzed. Syntheses of Nonracemic Reference Material and Determination of Absolute Configuration. The absolute configuration of (R)-Falcarinol (R)-3 and (S)-Falcarinol (S)-3 was confirmed by comparison with known optical rotation values.6 The absolute configuration of compound (2R,3R)-4 was confirmed by comparison with a known optical rotation value. Since conflicting values have been reported,11,12 the absolute configuration of (2R,3R)-4 was elucidated by GC analysis on a chiral stationary phase by coinjection with the independently synthesized (2R,3R)-enantiomer following a known procedure.27 (E)-2-Decen-1-ol 17. To a stirred solution of LiAlH4 (4.5 g, 39.5 mmol) in dry THF (80 mL) was added a solution of alkyne

Enantioconvergent Enzyme-Triggered Cascade Reaction 11 (6 g, 39 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) dropwise at 0 °C. Then the cooling bath was removed, the mixture was refluxed for 16 h and cooled to 0 °C, and 5% aq HCl (30 mL) was slowly added. The product was extracted with Et2O (2 × 50 mL), and the organic phase was dried and concentrated. Flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 7:1) gave 17 as a colorless liquid (5.2 g, 86%). Rf (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.75, (detection I); 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.87 (3H, t, J ) 6.6), 1.22-1.37 (10H, m), 1.88, (1H, s), 2.02 (2H, q, J ) 6.8), 4.06 (2H, d, J ) 5.6), 5.58-5.69 (2H, m). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.0, 22.5, 29.0 (3×), 31.7, 32.1, 63.6, 128.7, 133.3. (E)-1-Chloro-2-decene 18. According to the procedure described for 13, alcohol 17 (5 g, 32.0 mmol) in CCl4 (50 mL) was treated with PPh3 (12.5 g, 47.5 mmol) without argon atmosphere to afford 18 (4.70 g, 84%) as a colorless liquid after flash chromatography (petroleum ether). Rf (petroleum ether/ EtOAc, 1:1) ) 0.95, (detection II); 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 0.90 (3H, t, J ) 6.8), 1.24-1.42 (10H, m), 2.06 (2H, q, J ) 7.1), 4.04 (2H, d, J ) 7.0), 5.60-5.64 (1H, m), 5.755.80 (1H, m). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ ) 14.0, 22.6, 28.8, 29.00, 29.03, 31.8, 32.0, 45.4, 125.8, 136.1. (2R,3R)-1,2-Epoxy-3-decanol (2R,3R)-4 via Asymmetric Dihydroxylation Using AD-Mix-β. To a stirred solution of methanesulfonamide (0.16 g, 1.7 mmol), K2CO3 (0.7 g, 5.13 mmol), and AD-mix-β (1 g) in t-BuOH (13 mL) and H2O (13 mL) was added chloroalkene 18 (0.3 g, 1.7 mmol) at 0 °C. The solution was stirred for 124 h at room temperature. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried and evaporated. The residue was dissolved in dry THF (30 mL), and NaH (2 mmol) was added. After 30 min, water (15

mL) was added carefully. The solution was extracted three times with Et2O (20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to afford (2R,3R)-4 (0.16 g, 54%) ee ) 84%. [R]20 D -4.5 (c 1.25, CHCl3). The optical rotation of this material is in accordance to that of the biotransformation product with Streptomyces sp. FCC008. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra matched those described above for rac-cis-4. The absolute configuration of (3R,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol (3R,9R,10R)-1 and (3S,9R,10R)-Panaxytriol (3S,9R,10R)-2 was confirmed by comparison with known optical rotation values.11,12

Acknowledgment. We wish to express our cordial thanks to J.-E. Ba¨ckvall (Stockholm University) for a generous donation of Ru catalyst and Novo Nordisk for supplying us with C. antarctica lipase. B. H. Sterk and K. Zangger (University of Graz) skillfully assisted in NMR spectroscopy, and R. Saf helped in mass spectroscopy. This research was performed within the Spezialforschungsbereich Biokatalyse (SFB-A4, project no. F-104) and was financed by the Fonds zur Fo¨rderung der wissenschaflichen Forschung and the Austrian Ministry of Science. Supporting Information Available: 1H NMR spectra of all synthesized compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. JO020073W

J. Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 26, 2002 9121