Construction and Operation Costs of Wastewater Treatment and

Sep 23, 2016 - Previous models mainly involved factors relating to the treatment scale and efficiency of treatment facilities for deriving the cost fu...
2 downloads 7 Views 409KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND

Article

Construction and Operation Costs of Wastewater Treatment and Implications for the Paper Industry in China Kunyu Niu, Jian Wu, Fang Yu, and Jingli Guo Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03835 • Publication Date (Web): 23 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 29, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Construction and Operation Costs of Wastewater Treatment

2

and Implications for the Paper Industry in China Kunyu Niua,b

3

Institute

of

Agricultural

Jian Wuc,*

Economics

and

Fang Yub Jingli Guoa

4

a.

Development,

Chinese

Academy

of

5

Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 100081;

6

b.

Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing, China, 100012;

7

c.

School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing,China,

8

100872.

9

Abstract: This paper aims to develop construction and operation cost model of wastewater

10

treatment of paper industry in China and explores the main factors that determine these costs.

11

Previous models mainly involved factors relating to the treatment scale and efficiency of treatment

12

facilities for deriving the cost function. We considered the factors more comprehensively by adding a

13

regional variable to represent the economic development level, a corporate ownership factor to

14

represent the plant characteristics, a sub-sector variable to capture pollutant characteristics and a

15

detailed-classification technology variable. We applied a unique dataset from a national pollution

16

source census for the model simulation. The major findings include: (1) Wastewater treatment costs

17

in the paper industry are determined by scale, technology, degree of treatment, ownership, and

18

regional factors; (2) Wastewater treatment costs show a large decreasing scale effect; (3) the current

19

level of pollutant discharge fees are far lower than the marginal treatment costs for meeting the

20

wastewater discharge standard. Key implications are as follows: (1) Cost characteristics and impact

21

factors should be fully recognized when planning or making policies relating to wastewater treatment 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 28

22

projects or technology development; (2) There is potential to reduce treatment costs by centralizing

23

wastewater treatment via industrial parks; (3) Wastewater discharge fee rates should be increased; (4)

24

Energy efficient technology should become the future focus of wastewater treatment.

25 26

Keywords: Wastewater Treatment; Construction Cost; Operation Cost; Paper Industry

27

TOC Art Unit Treatment Cost

Marginal Treatment Cost

28 29 30 31 Scale

32

Pollutant Concentration

33 34 35

1.

Introduction

36

Wastewater treatment cost analysis can provide important information for the planning, prediction

37

and policy-making relating to wastewater treatment projects’ development and management1-3. An

38

understanding of the marginal wastewater treatment cost can lay a foundation for the formulation of

39

feasible environmental tax policies1. However, there is still very limited information about the cost of

40

industrial wastewater treatment plants (including construction and operation costs), and even fewer

41

empirical studies in this particular area. Existing literature primarily focuses on exploring or

42

assessing the wastewater treatment technology from a technical or engineering perspective5-12, while

43

few studies analyze the wastewater treatment costs or the correlation between the costs with

44

management and economic statuses13. Some articles focus on the cost function and analysis of urban

45

wastewater treatment14-19, but few focus on industrial wastewater treatment costs

46

reasons include the complication of industrial wastewater treatment, large differences in wastewater 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4,20,21

. The main

Page 3 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

47

treatment costs due to the differences in pollutant types between industries, a shortage of researchers

48

that can conduct economic analysis on wastewater treatment18, and the difficulty in acquiring

49

relevant and accurate information.

50

The paper industry produces the largest chemical oxygen demand (COD) discharges among all

51

industrial sectors in China22. It contributes to about 32.37% of total COD discharges within the

52

industry sector. Meanwhile, it only contributes 1.43% to total industrial added value23. As requested

53

by the State Council in the “12th Five-Year Plan of National Environmental Protection”, greater

54

efforts will be put into controlling pollution in key sectors, including the paper making, printing and

55

dyeing sectors, in order to reduce discharges of COD24. In this context, we develop the construction

56

and operation cost function of wastewater treatment for the paper industry, in an attempt to

57

comprehensively understand the cost structure and major factors that impact wastewater treatment

58

costs.

59

With the cost model, we analyze the impact on wastewater treatment costs from both technical

60

factors such as wastewater treatment scale, technology, degree of pollutant treatments, different sub-

61

sectors, as well as socio-economic factors such as the ownership of the plant and the geographical

62

location (which represents the economic context of the region). The model also enables us to

63

simulate the construction/operation costs as well as the marginal wastewater treatment costs for the

64

paper industry under different circumstances. Based on the above analyses, we are able to draw

65

conclusions and examine the potential policy implications.

66

2.

67

2.1 Methodology

68 69

Methodology and Data

Normally, the wastewater treatment construction and operation cost function is formed in exponent equations14-16, 25-28. The model is expressed as follows:

 =   ∗  ∗ 

(



 )  (1)



3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

70

Where,  is the construction cost ( ) or pollution abatement operation cost ( ) for wastewater

71

treatment facilities; W is the wastewater treatment scale, which appears as the design capacity of

72

wastewater treatment (DCWT) ( ) in the construction cost function, and the annual wastewater

73 74 75

treatment volume (AWTV) (  ) in the operation cost function; refers to the kth pollutant (k=1,2,…,n); is the concentration of pollutant in inlet wastewater;  is the concentration of pollutant in outlet wastewater; the ratio of inlet concentration to outlet concentration of

76

pollutants indicate the degree of pollutant treatment; α, β and  (k = 1,2, … , n)% are parameters.

77

This model is not only applicable to an industry with a single pollutant, but also applicable to

78

industries with multiple pollutants.

79

Most economic analysis regarding wastewater treatment indicates that the major determinants of

80

treatment costs involve wastewater treatment design scale or population density of the serving area,

81

or the amount of wastewater to be processed as well as effluent pollutant concentrations14-16, 25-28.

82

Sipala et al.29 concludes that wastewater treatment costs are related not only to treatment scale

83

(sometimes population density of the surrounding area), treatment degree and type of pollutant, but

84

also to the requirement of regional environmental management. McConnell and Schwartz30 and Yu

85

et al.

86

factors. Variables, including corporate ownership were incorporated into the models by Dasgupta et

87

al. 20, Wang and Wheeler 21. These improved models better addressed the issue of single or few

88

explanatory variables of treatment costs, yet some important aspects were not taken into account in

89

the selection of the explanatory variables in the actual application of such models. First, it is not

90

necessarily true that the more pollutants as explanatory variables are included in the model, the better

91

the model can be explained. For example, Hernandez-Sancho et al.18 and the study conducted by the

92

World Bank 20 included both COD and biological oxygen demand (BOD) in their models. However,

93

As both are the oxygen demand for pollutant oxidization, COD and BOD are highly related in

94

representing the degree of pollution, and the inclusion of the two types of pollutants in the same

19

indicate that wastewater treatment costs are also associated with regional development

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

95

model may lead to the problem of collinearity. Second, due to difficulties in data acquisition,

96

previous research may have missed some important variables. Few research studies incorporate most

97

of the important explanatory variables into their models18, 20, 21, 31, 32, for example, some incorporate

98

the factor of technology but left out region31,32. Third, for the industrial sector, there is a large

99

difference in the type of products in different sub-sectors within the same sector, as well as the

100

corresponding difficulty of wastewater treatment, yet previous research has failed to differentiate the

101

wastewater treatment costs between different sub-sectors of the same sector18, 20, 21. Last, at present

102

there has been no study using a large sample dataset to assess the industrial wastewater treatment

103

costs.

104

2.2 Model and Variables

105

In this study, we take Eq. (1) as the basic model to build the paper industry’s wastewater treatment

106

construction costs function and operation costs function by using a large sample dataset. The cost

107

model will involve explanatory factors including wastewater treatment scale, treatment technology,

108

pollutant treatment degree, business type, region and sub-sector. As shown in Eq. (1), the impact on

109

cost by factors other than treatment scale and pollutant treatment degree will be captured by

110

parameter α.

111

In order to specify variables, we first consider the type of pollutant in wastewater. The most

112

damaging conventional pollutant discharged by the pulp and paper industry is COD. Technologies

113

that control COD discharges tend to reduce the discharge levels of other pollutants33. Consequently,

114

we took COD as the exclusive pollutant variable in the model. Therefore, for the paper industry, &

115

=1 in Eq. (1), and refers to COD. In this study, COD refers to Total COD (which includes both

116

insoluble and soluble COD).

117

As for the variable of wastewater treatment technology, the wastewater treatment process in the

118

paper industry mainly includes four types of technical processes: physical, biological, chemical, and

119

physicochemical processes34. We further divide biological means into 3 different types: aerobic, 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

120

anaerobic and an anaerobic-aerobic combined process. These three types of biological treatment

121

processes differ greatly in terms of the facility/building, treatment principles and costs. Thus, our

122

revised model includes six types of wastewater treatment processes including physical, chemical,

123

physicochemical, aerobic, anaerobic and anaerobic-aerobic combined processes. In order to avoid

124

perfect collinearity, five of the technology factors (physical technology, chemical technology,

125

physicochemical technology, anaerobic technology and anaerobic-aerobic combined technology) are

126

set as dummy variables in the model, while the aerobic technology factor is set as the control

127

variable and is omitted from the model (table S1 in SI).

128

Dasgupta et al.20 considered the factor of corporate ownership when they studied China’s industrial

129

wastewater treatment costs. In their research, enterprises were classified into state-owned and non-

130

state-owned. In this study, corporate ownership is also considered as a variable that explains the

131

differences in wastewater treatment costs, but the ownership type was further classified. In China,

132

state-owned enterprises only cover a very small percentage of total enterprises in the paper industry

133

(2.4%), while the percentage of non-state-owned enterprises is much higher, with the private

134

enterprises occupying the largest proportion (81.3%) and foreign enterprises accounting for 16.3% 23.

135

Thus, this study classified enterprises into private enterprises, foreign enterprises and state-owned

136

enterprises (the definition of these three types of enterprises are described in Part 3 of the SI).

137

Similarly, private ownership and foreign ownership are set as dummy variables in the model, while

138

state-owned enterprises are set as the control variable (Table S1 in SI).

139

In order to explain the regional differences in wastewater treatment costs, we divide the location of

140

treatment facilities into the eastern, middle and western regions of China. To avoid perfect

141

collinearity, the eastern and middle regional variables of China are set as dummy variables in the

142

model, while the western region is set as the control variable (Table S1 in SI).

143

One important characteristic of industrial wastewater, different from that of the urban wastewater,

144

is that the composition of wastewater from different sub-sectors within the same sector differs a lot. 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 28

Page 7 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

145

The paper industry is divided into 3 different groups: the manufacture of pulp, paper, and paper

146

products35. The manufacture of pulp has a much higher level of pollution than paper and paper

147

products manufacturing processes. As a result, we classify pulp manufacture as one group of the sub-

148

sector variable, and paper and paper products as another group. Pulp manufacture is set as a dummy

149

variable with paper and paper products manufacture as the control variable (Table S1 in SI).

150 151

Taking Eq.(1) as basic model, and according to the classification of variables above, α in (1) should be expressed as (2): ' = (&) + '+, (-ℎ) + '/ (0) + '+/ (-0) + '12 (34) + '1/ (30) + '5 (6) + '+ (-) + '+ (-) + '7 () + '8 (9) (2)

152

After importing Eq. (2) into Eq. (1), using COD substitute in Eq.(1), we obtain: =

153

: ; (+,)