Core–Shell Soy Protein–Soy Polysaccharide Complex (Nano)particles

May 31, 2016 - Core–Shell Soy Protein–Soy Polysaccharide Complex (Nano)particles as Carriers for Improved Stability and Sustained Release of Curcu...
0 downloads 0 Views 994KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN

Article

Core-shell Soy Protein-Soy Polysaccharide Complex (Nano)particles as Carriers for Improved Stability and Sustained-Release of Curcumin Fei-Ping Chen, Shiyi Ou, and Chuan-He Tang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01176 • Publication Date (Web): 31 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 3, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

2

Core-shell Soy Protein-Soy Polysaccharide Complex (Nano)particles as

3

Carriers for Improved Stability and Sustained-Release of Curcumin

4 Fei-Ping Chen1, Shi-Yi Ou2, Chuan-He Tang1,3,*

5 6

1

Department of Food Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, People’s

7 8 9 10

Republic of China 2

Department of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People’s Republic of China

3

State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China

11

1 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

12

ABSTRACT. Using soy protein isolate (SPI) and soy polysaccharides (SSPS) as polymer matrixes,

13

this study reported a novel process to fabricate unique core-shell complex (nano)particles to perform

14

as carriers for curcumin (a typical poorly soluble bioactive). In the process, curcumin-SPI

15

nanocomplexes were first formed at pH 7.0, and then coated by SSPS. At this pH, the core-shell

16

complex was formed in a way the SPI nanoparticles might be incorporated into the interior of SSPS

17

molecules without distinctly affecting the size and morphology of particles. The core-shell structure

18

was distinctly changed by adjusting pH from 7.0 to 4.0. At pH 4.0, SSPS was strongly bound to the

19

surface of highly aggregated SPI nanoparticles, and as a consequence, much larger complexes were

20

formed. The bioaccessibility of curcumin in the SPI-curcumin complexes was unaffected by the SSPS

21

coating. However, the core-shell complex formation greatly improved the thermal stability and

22

controlled release properties of encapsulated curcumin. The improvement was much better at pH 4.0

23

than that at pH 7.0. All the freeze-dried core-shell complex preparations exhibited a good redispersion

24

behavior. The findings provide a simple approach to fabricate food-grade delivery systems for

25

improved water dispersion, heat stability and even controlled release of poorly soluble bioactives.

26

KEYWORDS. Curcumin; soy protein; soy polysaccharide; carrier; core-shell particles

27

2 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

28

INTRODUTION

29

Food proteins as natural vehicles for bioactive have recently attracted increasing interest in the food

30

science and medicine fields, since the complexation with proteins can greatly improve water

31

dispersibility, stability and bioaccessibility of poorly soluble bioactives 1, 2. Hydrophobic bioactives

32

are generally bound to proteins mainly through hydrophobic interactions, though in some cases, van

33

der Waals attraction and hydrogen bonds may be also involved. For a given bioactive, the

34

effectiveness of proteins to perform as carriers is largely determined by the nature of proteins. Due to

35

the ability to self-assemble into micellar nanostructures, casein or its caseinates has been recognized

36

to be an excellent carrier system for hydrophobic bioactives such as curcumin 3. For caseins,

37

hydrophobic bioactives are usually encapsulated within the interior of their self-assembled micelles.

38

By contrast, the complexation between these bioactives and globular proteins, e.g., whey proteins or

39

soy proteins, usually occurs on their surface, wherein the nature and number of hydrophobic clusters

40

seem to play an important role in the complexation 4. Heat-induced denaturation and subsequent

41

formation of aggregated particles has been confirmed to increase the effectiveness of β-lactoglobulin

42

or soy protein isolate (SPI) to act as carriers for curcumin 4, 5. The increased effectiveness is largely

43

due to the enhanced surface hydrophobicity of heat-treated proteins. However, one point is

44

noteworthy that the enhanced surface hydrophobicity might be unfavorable for the colloidal stability

45

of the protein systems. Furthermore, if the loaded amount of hydrophobic bioactives on the proteins is

46

high, the bound bioactives may act as ‘bridges’, thus further favoring protein-protein or particle-

47

particle interactions.

3 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

48

On the other hand,(nano)complexes or complex coacervates arising from protein-polysaccharide

49

electrostatic interaction seem to provide a solution to inhibit protein-protein aggregation, thus

50

exhibiting a great potential to perform as carriers for bioactives 6, 7. The complexation of proteins with

51

anionic polysaccharides (e.g., pectin, alginate, and soy polysaccharides) not only provides a steric

52

stabilization of proteins, but also may improve the stabilization of bioactives encapsulated in their

53

corresponding complex coacervates. For the protein-polysaccharide coacervates as the carriers,

54

bioactives are usually bound to proteins prior to the complexation between proteins and

55

polysaccharides 6. The effectiveness of these complex coacervates to perform as the carriers for

56

bioactives seems to be highly related to the nature of proteins and the applied pH (at which the

57

complexation occurs). For β-lactoglobulin-sodium alginate systems, Hosseini et al. 6 demonstrated

58

that their soluble nanocomplexes could be formed at both pH 7.0 and 4.25, and the solubility in water

59

of many nutraceutical agents, including β-carotene, folic acid, curcumin and ergocalciferol was

60

greatly improved. In this case, the nanocomplexes at pH 7.0 seemed to be a better carrier than at pH

61

4.25, due to higher molar binding ratios of the former. Santipanichwong and others 8 reported that the

62

electrostatic deposition of an anionic polysaccharide (beet pectin) onto heat-denatured β-lactoglobulin

63

aggregates at pH 7.0 resulted in formation of core-shell biopolymer nanoparticles. Similar complex

64

nanoparticles from heated β-lactoglobulin and pectin have been confirmed to act as carriers for

65

enhanced stability of linoleic acid 9. Ding & Yao 10 proposed an assembly approach to produce a folic

66

acid-loaded complex between soy protein and soy polysaccharide at pH 4.0. If a heat treatment was

67

performed on this complex, a kind of nanogels that were dispersible in acidic conditions could be

68

fabricated. Although the protein-polysaccharide complexes exhibit a great potential to perform as 4 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Page 4 of 33

Page 5 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

69

carriers for bioactives, very few information has been available addressing pH-dependent formation

70

mechanism of the complexes, stability, release behavior and bioaccessibility of encapsulated

71

bioactives.

72

The main objective of the current work was to systematically investigate the formation of SPI-soy

73

soluble polysaccharide (SSPS) complex coacervates at acidic (pH 4.0) or neutral (pH 7.0) pHs and

74

their potential as carriers for curcumin, a low-molecular-weight, natural polyphenolic compound

75

found in the rhizome of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Most of the proteins in SPI are usually present in

76

the nanoparticle aggregated state 11, and thus can perform as nanocarriers for curcumin4, 12, 13. SSPS is

77

an anionic and pectin-like polysaccharide, containing a covalently bound protein (with molecular

78

weight of ~50 kDa) 14. To form the core-shell particles, curcumin was first bound with SPI, and the

79

resultant curcumin-SPI complexes were further coated with SSPS. The core-shell (nano)particles have

80

been confirmed to act as nutraceutical carriers15.

81

82

MATERAILS AND METHODS

83

Materials. Soy protein isolate (SPI) was prepared in the laboratory from defatted soy flour according

84

to the same process as described in our previous work 4, with a protein content of about 91.5% (dry

85

basis; as determined using a Dumas combustion method, Elemental Analyzer rapid N cube, Germany,

86

with a nitrogen conversion factor of 6.25). Soybean soluble polysaccharides (SSPS) (purity > 95%)

87

was purchased from Gen-view Scientific Inc. (China). Porcine bile extract (B8631), pancreatin (from

88

porcine pancreas, P1750, 4×USP), pepsin (from porcine gastric mucosal, P7000, 975 units/mg of 5 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

89

protein) and curcumin (with a purity > 98%) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis,

90

MO, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

91

Formation of core-shell SPI-curcumin-SSPS complexes. The stock solutions of SPI and SSPS

92

were prepared at 2.0% and 1.0% (w/v) in distilled water respectively, with the help of a magnetic

93

stirrer for 3h, and then placed overnight for complete hydration. The pH of both solutions was

94

precisely adjusted to 7.0 with 0.2 M HCl. One milliliter of curcumin solution (5 mg/mL in absolute

95

ethyl alcohol) was first added dropwise to 20 mL of the SPI solution, and the mixture was mixed

96

under magnetic stirring conditions for 60 min. After that, 20 mL of SSPS solution was further added

97

dropwise to the curcumin-SPI mixture. The resultant SPI-curcumin complex was denoted as the

98

complex-I, while the complex-I together with SSPS was denoted as the complex-II. If the pH of the

99

dispersion containing the complex-II was further adjusted to 4.0 using 1 M HCl, the final resultant

100

101 102

Page 6 of 33

complex (at pH 4.0) was denoted as the complex-III.

To evaluate the redispersion behavior, the dispersions containing different complexes (I-III) were freeze-dried to produce the corresponding powders.

103

Encapsulation efficiency (EE) and retention ratio (RR) of curcumin. For the determination, all

104

the dispersions containing the complexes prior to the freeze-drying were centrifuged at 8000 g for 20

105

min to remove any insoluble curcumin crystal. The curcumin content in the resultant supernatants

106

(after the centrifugation) was determined as in the following section. The EE of curcumin in the

107

complexes was determined by the relative ratio of the curcumin amount in the supernatants to the

108

initial total curcumin amount (added to the system). 6 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Page 7 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

109

The RR of curcumin was determined on the freeze-dried complexes. The curcumin amount in the

110

freeze-dried complexes was also determined as the following section. The percentage of RR (RR%)

111

of curcumin was determined by the relative ratio of curcumin amount in the freeze-dried complexes to

112

the curcumin amount in their corresponding supernatants (after the centrifugation).

113

Curcumin extraction and determination. Aliquots (100 µL) of the aqueous samples containing

114

curcumin were diluted with 900 µL of deionized water, or about 10 mg of freeze-dried complex

115

powders were well dispersed in 1 mL of deionized water, and then 400 µL of the diluted samples

116

were extracted in 3 mL of extracting agent, a mixture of ethyl acetate and absolute ethyl alcohol at a

117

volume ratio of 10:1, under magnetic stirring conditions for 10 s. After that, the mixtures were placed

118

quiescently for 20 min to allow lamination. The curcumin content in the resultant supernatants was

119

determined at 420 nm with a UV754N UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Precision & Scientific Instrument,

120

Shanghai, China), according to an established standard curve of curcumin (with R2> 0.999).

121

Particle size and ξ-potential. The particle size distribution and z-average diameter (Dz) of particles

122

in SPI, SPI-curcumin complex or core-shell SSPS-SPI complex dispersions, at pH 7.0 and 4.0, were

123

evaluated using dynamic light scattering (DLS). Each solution was diluted to a protein concentration

124

of about 0.1% (w/v) with 5 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 or 4.0 (PBS; filtered with a 0.22 µm HA

125

Millipore membrane). DLS analysis was performed at a fixed angle of 173° using a Zetasizer Nano-

126

ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) equipped with a 4 mW He-Ne laser (633

127

nm wavelength) at 25 °C. Droplet sizing was performed at 10-s intervals in a particle-sizing cell using

128

backscattering technology. The Dz of particles was calculated based on the Stokes-Einstein equation,

7 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 33

129

assuming protein particles to be spherical. Each determination was performed in duplicates on

130

separate samples.

131

The ζ-potential of particles in all the aforementioned dispersions, or of SSPS, at pH 7.0 and 4.0 was

132

measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instrument Ltd., Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) in

133

combination with a multipurpose autotitrator (model MPT-2, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire,

134

UK). Freshly prepared solutions were diluted to a concentration of protein or polysaccharide to 0.1%

135

(w/v) with the same pH of PBS prior to analysis.

136

Atomic force microscopy (AFM). Morphological observations of SSPS, SPI-curcumin complexes,

137

or core-shell SPI-curcumin-SSPS complexes at pH 7.0 and 4.0 were performed using atomic force

138

microscopy (AFM, a Dimension 3000 microscope, Digital Instruments-Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA,

139

USA), according to the same processes using the same equipment as described in our previous work

140

12

.

141

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The structural characteristics of SPI, SSPS,

142

curcumin, SPI-curcumin complexes or core-shell SSPS-SPI complexes, formed at pH 4.0 or 7.0, were

143

monitored by FTIR with a Vector33 model Fourier transform infrared instrument (Bruker Co.,

144

Germany) at 25°C. All the samples were first freeze-dried and then mixed with KBr, and pressed into

145

a pellet. The spectra were acquired in the range 400~4000 cm-1 at a resolution of 4 cm-1.

146

Sequential in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. The bioaccessibility of curcumin in different

147

complexes with SPI alone, or with both SPI and SSPS, at pH 7.0 and 4.0,were evaluated using a

148

simulated gastrointestinal digestion model, according to the process as described in our previous work 8 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Page 9 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

149

12

150

concentration of 1.0% (w/v) was adjusted to pH 2.0 with 2 M HCl and then preincubated in a shaker

151

(37°C, 95 rpm) for 10 min. Four micrograms of pepsin powder was added and well mixed to start the

152

simulated gastric digestion (0~60min). After 60 min of digestion at 37°C, the pH of the pepsin-digests

153

was adjusted to 7.0 with 4.0 M NaOH, and then100 mg of bile extract powder was added and well

154

dispersed in the shaker for 10 min. Last, 8 mg of pancreatin powder was added to start the simulated

155

intestinal digestion (60~120 min). At the end of the whole digestion, 1 mL of the digest samples was

156

collected and centrifuged at 10000 g for 30 min, then the curcumin in the resultant supernatants was

157

extracted and determined as described above. The bioaccessibility was defined as percent of curcumin

158

amount remaining in the aqueous phase (after the centrifugation), after the whole gastric and intestinal

159

digestion (180min).

, with a few modifications. In brief, 20 mL of freshly prepared complex dispersions at a protein

160

The degradation kinetics of curcumin encapsulated in these complexes during the digestion was

161

monitored by detecting the relative decrease in curcumin amount of the whole digests (as a function

162

of digestion time).

163

In vitro release of encapsulated curcumin in PBS. The in vitro release behavior of curcumin from

164

different complexes formed at pH 7.0 or 4.0 was evaluated in pH 7.0 PBS, according to the method of

165

Teng and others 16, with a few modifications. All the PBS buffers applied in this section contained 5

166

mg/mL Tween 20. Four milliliters of different complexes (at a protein concentration of 1.0%, w/v)

167

were filled into dialysis bags (MW cutoff 6~8 kDa). Each dialysis bags was then immersed in a flask

168

containing 100 mL of PBS (preheated at 37°C). The flask was incubated in a reciprocal shaking bath

169

(AoHua Ltd, Changzhou, China) at 37°C under constant shaking conditions at a rate of 120 rpm. At 9 - Environment ACS Paragon -Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 33

170

required incubation time intervals, aliquots (2 mL) of samples were taken from the flask, and diluted

171

with an appropriate amount of PBS. The concentration of released curcumin in the resultant

172

dispersions was determined at 426 nm using a UV754N UV-Vis spectrophotometer, according to an

173

established standard curve of curcumin (with R2 > 0.999). After each sampling, 2 mL of fresh PBS

174

was added to the flask to maintain the total volume of samples constant. The release kinetics of

175

curcumin was plotted as a function of time.

176

Thermal stability. The thermal stability of curcumin encapsulated in different complexes at pH 7.0

177

or 4.0 was evaluated by monitoring the degradation kinetics of curcumin, upon heating at 80°C up to

178

3 h. In brief, 20 mL of the complexes freshly prepared, or free curcumin dispersion (prepared by

179

adding 0.5 mL of curcumin solution (in absolute ethyl alcohol; at 5 mg/mL, into 20 mL of water at pH

180

7.0) was transferred to a clean amber bottle and incubated at 80°C in a water bath. At predetermined

181

time intervals, aliquots (100 uL) of the heated samples were taken out. The curcumin remaining in

182

these samples was extracted and determined as described aforementioned.

183 184

Statistical analysis. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the data was performed, and a least significant difference (LSD) with a confidence interval of 95% was used to compare the means.

185

186

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

187

Characterization of curcumin-loaded core-shell particles. Encapsulation efficiency (EE) and

188

retention ratio (RR) of curcumin. The dispersion containing SPI and curcumin at pH 7.0 was

189

transparent, but orange-yellow in color (Figure 1 A), indicating the formation of SPI-curcumin 10 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 11 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

190

complex at nanoscale (complex-I). The visual observation did not distinctly change upon the addition

191

of SSPS (Figure 1 A), suggesting good compatibility between SPI and SSPS at pH 7.0 (due to the

192

same charge on the surface). When the pH of the dispersion containing the complex-I in the presence

193

of SSPS (complex-II) was adjusted from 7.0 to 4.0, the dispersion became turbid, but still kinetically

194

stable (even after a storage up to 3 days; Figure 1 A). In contrast, if the pH of the complex-I

195

dispersion was directly adjusted to 4.0, severe aggregation and phase separation would occur within a

196

short period of storage (data not shown), clearly as a result of remarkably decreased electrostatic

197

repulsion. Considering the fact that soy proteins at pH 4.0 is positively charged, while the charge of

198

SSPS is negative, it can be reasonably hypothesized that the coating with negatively charged SSPS on

199

the surface of the complex-II might increase the inter-particle electrostatic repulsion, thus improving

200

the colloidal stability of the dispersion.

201

The EE% of curcumin in the curcumin-loaded complexes I, II and III was determined to be 89.12%,

202

93.1% and 96.0%, respectively (data not shown), indicating that although the complex-I (using SPI

203

alone as the vehicle) exhibited high encapsulation efficiency, the formation of core-shell structure

204

could further improve the encapsulation efficiency. Interestingly, in the complex-III case, the EE%

205

reached 96.0%, implying that almost all of the curcumin molecules could be transformed into the

206

complex. We also evaluated the influence of a freeze-drying on the redispersion behavior of the

207

curcumin-loaded complexes (I-III), and found that all the curcumin-loaded preparations exhibited a

208

good redispersion behavior, as evidenced by no distinct changes in visual observation between the

209

original and freeze-dried/reconstituted dispersions (Figure 1 A). Figure 1 B shows the retention ratio

210

of curcumin in the freeze-dried curcumin-loaded complex preparations (I-III). For the curcumin in the 11 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 12 of 33

211

complex-I, almost 30% of curcumin was degraded after the freeze-drying, while in the case of the

212

complex-II, the loss was only 5.5% (Figure 1 B), indicating that the presence of SSPS considerably

213

improved the stability of curcumin against the freeze-drying. The loss of curcumin for the complex-III

214

was similar to that for the complex-II (Figure 1 B). The observations clearly showed that the

215

formation of core-shell complex nanoparticles remarkably improved the encapsulation efficiency and

216

retention ratio of curcumin.

217

Particle size and ξ-potential. Figure 2 shows the z-average diameter (Dz) and ξ-potential of

218

particles in dispersions containing curcumin-loaded SPI, or SPI-SSPS complexes, at pH 7.0 and 4.0.

219

At pH 7.0, the Dz of particles in the SPI dispersion was about 82 nm, which is in accordance with our

220

previous work 17. At this pH, the Dz did not suffer a significant change after complexation with

221

curcumin, but significantly increased to about 300 nm when SSPS was further introduced (Figure 2

222

A). The increase in particle size upon the addition of SSPS might reflect the coating of negatively

223

charged polysaccharide on the surface of the SPI-curcumin complex, resulting in formation of a core-

224

shell structure. The coating may be attributed to electrostatic, hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen

225

bonding between the proteins and the polysaccharide 15. The pH adjustment (from 7.0 to 4.0) further

226

significantly increased the Dz of particles (Figure 2 A). At pH 4.0, the protein and SSPS were

227

contrarily charged, and as a consequence, their electrostatic interaction would be strengthened. On the

228

other hand, the inter-particle attractive interactions of the proteins themselves at pH 4.0 (close to their

229

isoelectric point) also increased as compared to that at pH 7.0. Thus, the distinct increase in particle

230

size for the core-shell complex upon the pH decreasing might be a result of re-arrangement of core-

231

shell structure, and subsequently, formation of more compact and stable ‘core-shell’ structure. 12 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 13 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

232

Another point is noteworthy that if the complex-I was not coated by the SSPS, the pH adjustment

233

(from 7.0 to 4.0) would lead to formation of much larger particles as compared to the complex-II (6.0

234

µm vs 0.8 µm; data not shown). This observation suggests that the SSPS coating did produce a de-

235

aggregation effect on the protein particles at acidic pH conditions. The protein de-aggregation in

236

acidic SPI dispersions by the SSPS addition has been similarly observed in previous works 14, 18,

237

wherein the increased stability against aggregation was largely attributed to the steric repulsion.

238

As expected, the magnitude of ξ-potential for the SPI particles at pH 7.0 was greater than that at pH

239

4.0 (-27 mV vs 13 mV; Figure 2 B). The binding of curcumin at pH 7.0 did not significantly affect

240

the surface charge of the particles in the dispersions. However, remarkable changes in ξ-potential of

241

particles (from -27 mV to -43 mV) were observed after further addition of SSPS, which is clearly as a

242

result of the formation between protein particles and negatively changed polysaccharides.

243

Interestingly, the magnitude of ξ-potential of core-shell particles at pH 7.0 was close to that of SSPS

244

(Figure 2 B), suggesting that the surface charge of core-shell particles be largely dominated by SSPS.

245

This is an indirect evidence to indicate that the surface of the curcumin-loaded SPI nanoparticles at

246

pH 7.0 was coated by the SSPS. As the pH was adjusted from 7.0 to 4.0, the magnitude of ξ-potential

247

of particles to a certain extent decreased, which is consistent with the decrease in ξ-potential of SSPS

248

alone (Figure 2 B), further confirming the dominant role of the SSPS on the colloidal stability of the

249

dispersions.

250

Particle morphology and intra-particle interactions. The microstructural morphology of particles

251

for curcumin-loaded SPI or SPI-SSPS complexes at pH 7.0 or 4.0 was evaluated using AFM, with the

252

3D AFM images displayed in Figure 3. For the curcumin-loaded SPI complexes at pH 7.0, most of 13 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 33

253

particles were present in a dissociated state with heights of several nanometers (Figure 3 A). The

254

particle morphology of this complex is similar to that for the SPI alone (data not shown), which is in

255

agreement with the DLS data (Figure 2 A), confirming that the complexation with curcumin did not

256

distinctly affect the particle size. When the curcumin-loaded SPI complexes were further coated with

257

SSPS, it can be observed that the heights for a large portion of particles were unaffected by the

258

coating with SSPS, while the fraction of particles with large sizes increased (Figure 3 A, B). On the

259

other hand, the SSPS molecules alone could not be observed in the AFM images (Figure 3 D),

260

possibly due to their linear and flexible structure in nature. Taking the DLS data (Figure 2 A) into

261

account together, it can be reasonably hypothesized that the increased Dz by the SSPS coating might

262

be largely due to increased hydration layer of the SPI nanoparticles, as a result of the SSPS coating on

263

their surface. In other words, the observations suggest that the core-shell structure formed at pH 7.0

264

might be relatively loose, and the curcumin-loaded SPI nanoparticles be entrapped within the flexible

265

chain of SSPS.

266

Compared with the core-shell complexes at pH 7.0, the particles in the core-shell SPI-SSPS

267

complexes at pH 4.0 had much greater heights and contour sizes (Figure 3 B, C). In this core-shell

268

complex, the width sizes ranged about 100 nm to 500 nm, which is basically consistent with the

269

particle size distribution profile as observed by DLS (data not shown). In addition, it can be observed

270

that the surface of the particles for the core-shell complexes at pH 4.0 was more smooth and regular,

271

implying stronger intra-particle interactions. The observations clearly indicated that the pH

272

adjustment (from 7.0 to 4.0) might be favorable for the formation of more compact and ordered core-

14 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 15 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

273

shell complexes. The proposed mechanism for the formation of core-shell SPI-curcumin-SSPS

274

complexes at pH 7.0 and 4.0 can be illustrated in Figure 5.

275

To further unravel the intra-particle interactive force pattern, we evaluated the structural

276

characteristics of freeze-dried SPI, SSPS or their complexes using FTIR technique, and their typical

277

FTIR profiles are shown in Figure 4. The major characteristic peaks of SPI were 1650cm-1(amide Ⅰ,

278

C=O stretching) and 1541cm-1(amide II, N-H bending), which are well consistent with previous

279

works 19, 20. SSPS has a pectin-like structure, which is composed of rhamnogalacturonan as the

280

backbone. The featured IR bands of SSPS were 3432 cm-1 (N-H bending), 1630 cm-1 (COO-

281

stretching) and 1057 cm-1 (rhamnogalacturonan moiety) 20. The characteristic FTIR profiles of SPI

282

were nearly unaffected by the complexation with curcumin (Figure 4), indicating that the

283

complexation did not involve the peptide amides of the proteins. This indirectly supported our

284

previous argument that the complexation with curcumin occurred on the surface hydrophobic domains

285

of the proteins 4. At pH 7.0, distinct blue shifts for the amide I peaks (2-4 nm) were observed after the

286

curcumin-loaded SPI complexes were further coated by the SSPS (Figure 4). A similar phenomenon

287

has been observed in the formation of α-tocopherol-loaded zein-chitosan complexes 21, wherein it was

288

largely attributed to the occurrence of inter-molecular electrostatic interactions between proteins and

289

polysaccharides. In a review, Ye 7 confirmed that the electrostatic interactions between anionic

290

polysaccharides and positively charged part of proteins can occur at neutral pH.

291

Besides the band shift, the magnitude of the amide I and II bands for the proteins was distinctly

292

decreased by the SSPS coating (Figure 4). In contrast, the magnitude of the amide I and II bands at

293

pH 4.0 was much less affected by the SSPS (Figure 4). Considering the fact that the particles in SPI 15 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 33

294

highly varied in size between at pH 7.0 and 4.0 (72 nm vs 6.2 µm; Figure 2 A), the observations thus

295

strongly suggest that the intra-particle interactions of SPI particles at pH 7.0 were distinctly weakened

296

by the SSPS coating, while that at pH 4.0 was slightly affected. On the other hand, the bands assigned

297

to carboxylate in SSPS at around 1630 cm-1 was not detectable in the SSPS-SPI complexes (Figure

298

4), further indicating interactions between the protein and the polysaccharide.

299

Bioaccessibility and stability of curcumin during in vitro simulated digestion. The

300

bioaccessibility of curcumin in different complexes (I-III), defined as percent of curcumin remaining

301

in the supernatants after sequential simulated gastric (1 h) and intestinal (2 h) digestion (relative to the

302

initial total curcumin), was evaluated using an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model. All the test

303

curcumin-loaded complexes have a similar bioaccessibility of around 60% (Figure 6 A), indicating

304

that the SSPS coating did not distinctly affect the bioaccessibility of curcumin in the complexes with

305

SPI particles. The bioaccessibility of curcumin in the SPI complex at pH 7.0 is much less than that

306

reported in our previous work 12. The lower curcumin bioaccessibility in the current work might be

307

related to the much higher loading amount of curcumin in the complexes (1.25% vs ~0.18% in the

308

previous work).

309

On the other hand, the degradation of curucmin occurring during the digestion was also evaluated,

310

as displayed in Figure 6 B. As expected, the curcumin in these complexes suffered a gradual

311

degradation as the digestion proceeded, indicating its instability in an aqueous environment in nature.

312

There was no significant difference in stability of curcumin during the gastric digestion between

313

different complexes. During the intestinal digestion, the curcumin encapsulated in the core-shell

314

complex at pH 7.0 was degraded at a significantly higher rate than that in the complexes with SPI 16 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 17 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

315

alone at the same pH, or in the core-shell preparation at pH 4.0 (Figure 6 B). The lower stability of

316

curcumin in the complex II (relative to that in the complexes I or III) might be related to the

317

differences in polarity of microenvironment of encapsulated curcumin in the complexes. At pH 7.0,

318

the coating of SSPS on the surface of SPI-curcumin complexes seemed to increase the polarity of

319

microenvironment of encapsulated curcumin, due to the formation of loose hydration layer.

320

In vitro release behavior of curcumin in complexes. The release kinetics of curucmin encapsulated

321

in different complexes (I-III) was evaluated using a pH7.0 PBS/Tween 20 system as adopted by Teng

322

et al. 16, and the results are shown in Figure 7. All the curcumin-loaded complexes exhibited a release

323

behavior that can be well described using a first-order kinetic model, suggesting that the release of

324

curcumin from these complexes was mainly dominated by the concentration-dependent diffusion

325

from the polymer matrix. The release behavior is similar to that observed for curcumin released from

326

β-lactoglobulin-based nanoparticles that were fabricated by glutaraldehyde crosslinking 16. By

327

contrast, it can be observed that irrespectively of the applied pH, the SSPS coating distinctly slowed

328

down the release rate of curucmin from the SPI complexes (Figure 7). The released amount of

329

curcumin at 20 h (56-60%) from the core-shell complexes at pH 4.0 or 7.0 was considerably lower

330

than that (~90%) from the complex with SPI alone. The delayed release was clearly associated with

331

the formation of core-shell structure that could to a great extent limit the diffusion of encapsulated

332

curucmin molecules from SPI particles.

333

Thermal stability of curcumin. Curcumin is very unstable in aqueous environment, especially at

334

high temperatures. About 70% of total amount for free curcumin in water was degraded after a

335

storage of 30 min at 25 °C; the complexation with SPI could greatly increase the stability of curucmin 17 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 18 of 33

336

against degradation during storage at room or high temperatures 12. In the current work, we evaluated

337

the degradation kinetics of curcumin encapsulated in different complexes (I-III), at 80°C, as displayed

338

in Figure 8. As expected, all the curcumin-loaded complex preparations exhibited an exponential

339

decay behavior of encapsulated curcumin, as the time of heating proceeded (Figure 8). For the

340

curcumin encapsulated in the complex-I, almost 65% was degraded after the heating up to 3 h. In

341

contrast, the loss in the core-shell complexes after the same heating was only 44% (complex-II) and

342

19% (complex-III) (Figure 8), indicating improvement of thermal stability of curucmin by the

343

formation of a core-shell complex structure. The formation of more compacted ‘core-shell’ SPI-SSPS

344

complex structure could exhibit an extraordinary stabilization for the encapsulated curcumin against

345

heating-induced degradation.

346

In summary, the present work reported the elaboration of core-shell SPI-SSPS complexes as

347

carriers for improved water dispersibility, stability and sustained-release of curcumin. The curcumin-

348

loaded core-shell complexes were formed via two steps: a nanocomplex between curcumin and SPI

349

nanoparticles was formed at pH 7.0 by molecular complexation, and the SSPS was then introduced to

350

coat the surface of the initially curcumin-loaded SPI nanocomplexes. In the core-shell structure, the

351

SPI nanoparticles might be incorporated within the interior of flexible SSPS molecules. The

352

bioaccessibility of encapsulated curcumin in the complexes was unaffected by the coating of SSPS.

353

However, the core-shell complex formation greatly improved the thermal stability and controlled-

354

release behavior of encapsulated curcumin. When the pH of the SPI-curcumin-SSPS complex

355

dispersion was adjusted from 7.0 to 4.0, the core-shell structure distinctly changed accordingly. At pH

356

4.0, the SSPS would be strongly bound to the surface of the aggregated SPI nanoparticles, and as a 18 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 19 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

357

result, much compact and large core-shell structure was formed. As compared with that at pH 7.0, the

358

pH adjustment (from 7.0 to 4.0) further improved the thermal stability of encapsulated curcumin. The

359

findings would be of great importance for providing a strategy to develop a kind of water dispersible

360

and heat-stable curcumin ingredients suitable for curcumin-enriched functional food formulations.

361

362

AUTHOR INFORMATION

363

Corresponding Author

364

(C.H.T.) Fax (086)20-87114263. E-mail: [email protected].

365

Notes

366

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

367

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

368

This work was supported by the NNSF of China (serial numbers: 31471695 and 31130042).

369

19 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

370

371 372

373 374 375

Page 20 of 33

REFERENCES.

(1)

Livney, Y. D. (2010). Milk proteins as vehicles for bioactives. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface

Sci. 2010, 15, 73-83.

(2)

McClements, D. J. Nanoscale nutrient delivery systems for food applications: Improving

bioactive dipersibility, stability, and bioavailability. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, N1602-N1611. (3)

Esmaili, M.; Ghaffari, M.; Moosavi-Movahedi, Z.; Atri, M. S.; Sharifizadeh, A.; Farhadi, M.;

376

Yousefi, R.; Chobert, J. M.; Haertlé, T.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. Beta casein-micelle as a nano

377

vehicle for solubility enhancement of curcumin; food industry application. LWT 2011, 44, 2166-2172

378

(2011).

379

(4)

380 381

Chen, F. P.; Li, B. S.; Tang, C. H. Nanocomplexation of soy protein isolate with curcumin:

Influence of ultrasonic treatment. Food Res. Int. 2015, 75, 157-165. (5)

Sneharani, A. H.; Karakkat, J. V.; Singh, S. A.; Rao, A. G. A. Interaction of curcumin with β-

382

lactoglobulin -Stability, spectroscopic analysis, and molecular modeling of the complex. J. Agric.

383

Food Chem. 2010, 58, 11130-11139.

384

(6)

Hoseeini, S. M. H.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Sabatino, P.; Van der Meeren, P. Nanocomplexes

385

arising from protein-polysaccharide electrostatic interaction as a promising carrier for nutraceutical

386

compounds. Food Hydrocolloids 2015, 50, 16-26.

387 388

(7)

Ye, A. Complexation between milk proteins and polysaccharides via electrostatic interaction:

principles and applications -a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 406-415.

20 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 21 of 33

389

(8)

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Santipanichwong, R.; Suphantharika, M.; Weiss, J.; McClements, D. J. Core-shell biopolymer

390

nanoparticles produced by electrostatic deposition of beet pectin onto heat-denatured beta-

391

lactoglobulin aggregates. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, N23-30.

392

(9)

Perez, A.; Sponton, O. E.; Andermattern, R. B.; Rubiolo, A.; Santiago, L. G. Biopolymer

393

nanoparticles designed for polyunsaturated fatty acid vehiculizaition: Protein-polysaccharide ratio

394

study. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 543-550.

395 396 397

(10) Ding, X.; Yao, P. Soy protein/soy polysaccharide complex nanogels: Folic acid loading, protection, and controlled delivery. Langmuir 2013, 29, 8636-8644. (11)

Tang, C. H. Emulsifying properties of soy proteins: A critical review with emphasis on the

398

role of conformational flexibility. Cri. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, DOI:

399

10.1080/10408398.2015.1067594.

400

(12)

Chen, F. P.; Li, B. S.; Tang, C. H. Nanocomplexation between curcumin and soy protein

401

isolate: Influence on curcumin stability/ bioaccessibility and in vitro protein digestibility. J. Agric.

402

Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3559-3569.

403 404 405 406 407 408

(13)

Tapal, A.; Tiku, P. K. Complexation of curcumin with soy protein isolate and its implications

on solubility and stability of curcumin. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 960-965. (14)

Ray, M.; Rousseau, D. Stabilization of oil -in -water emulsions using mixtures of denatured

soy whey proteins and soluble soybean polysaccharides. Food Res. Int. 2013, 52, 298-307. (15)

Chen, L.Y.; Subirade, M. Chitosan/β-lactoglobulin core-shell nanoparticles as nutraceutical

carriers. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 6041-6053. 21 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

409

(16)

Teng, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q. Insight into curcumin-loaded β-lactoglobulin nanoparticles:

410

Incorporation, particle disintegration, and releasing profiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8837-

411

8847.

412

(17)

413 414 415 416

Chen, F. P.; Zhang, N.; Tang, C. H. Enhanced water solubility and stability of coenzyme Q10

by complexation with food protein. LWT 2015, submitted for publication. (18)

Tran, T.; Rousseau, D. Stabilization of acidic soy protein-based dispersions and emulsions by

soy soluble polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids 2013, 30, 382-392. (19)

Liu, Y. Y.; Zeng, X. A.; Deng, Z.; Yu, S.J.; Yamasaki, S. Effect of pulsed electric field on

417

the secondary structure and thermal properties of soy protein isolate. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2011,

418

233, 841-850.

419

(20)

Teng, Z.; Luo, Y. C.; Wang, Q. Nanoparticles synthesized from soy protein: preparation,

420

characterization, and application for nutraceutical encapsulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60,

421

2712-2720.

422

Page 22 of 33

(21)

Luo, Y. C.; Zhang, B. C.; Whent, M.; Yu, L. L.; Wang, Q. Preparation and characterization

423

of zein/chitosan complex for encapsulation of α-tocopherol, and its in vitro controlled release study.

424

Colloids Surfaces B 2011, 85, 145-152.

425

22 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Page 23 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

426

Figure captions.

427

Figure 1. A) Visual observations of dispersions of original and freeze-dried/reconstituted SPI-curcumin

428

or SPI-curcumin-SSPS complexes (I-III). Complex-I: SPI-curcumin complex at pH 7.0; Complex-II:

429

SPI-curcumin-SSPS complex at pH 7.0; Complex-III: SPI-curcumin-SSPS complex at pH 4.0. B)

430

Retention ratio (RR) of curcumin in these freeze-dried complexes (I-III). Each data are represented as

431

means and standard deviations (n=3). Different letters (a-b) on the top of columns represent significant

432

difference at p < 0.05 level.

433

Figure 2. Z-average diameter (A) and ξ-potential (B) of particles in dispersions containing SPI alone, or

434

SPI-curcumin complexes (with or without soy soluble polysaccharide), at pH 7.0 and 4.0. The

435

complexes (I-III) are the same as in caption of Figure 1. Each datum is the means and standard

436

deviations (n = 3).

437

Figure 3. AFM observations of SSPS and curcumin-loaded complex samples, A: complex-I; B:

438

complex-II; C: complex-III; D: SSPS. The complexes (I-III) are the same as in caption of Figure 1.

439

Figure 4. FTIR spectra of single ingredients and their complex samples, A: curcumin; B: SSPS; C: SPI;

440

D: complex-I; E: complex-II; F: complex-III. The complexes (I-III) are the same as in caption of Figure

441

1.

442

Figure 5. Schematic illustration for the formation of ‘core-shell’ SPI-curcumin-SSPS complexes at pH

443

7.0 and 4.0.

444

Figure 6. A) Bioaccessibility of curcumin in the different complexes with SPI and/or soy soluble

445

polysaccharide after the whole in vitro simulated gastric and intestinal digestion; B) Degradation kinetic 23 - Environment ACS Paragon-Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 24 of 33

446

of curcuminin the complexes during the simulated gastric and intestinal digestion. The complexes (I-III)

447

are the same as in caption of Figure 1. Each datum is the means and standard deviations (n = 3). The

448

same letter (a) on the top of columns represent insignificant difference at p < 0.05 level between

449

different complexes.

450

Figure 7. Kinetic release profiles of curcumin from SPI-curcumin complexes and SPI-curcumin-SSPS

451

complexes in 5 mM PBS (pH 7.0; containing 5 mg/mL Tween 20). The complexes (I-III) are the same

452

as in caption of Figure 1. Each datum is the means and standard deviations (n = 3).

453

Figure 8. Degradation kinetic of curcumin encapsulated in the SPI complexes or in core-shell SPI-SSPS

454

complexes in water upon storage for up to 3 h at 80°C. The complexes (I-III) are the same as in caption

455

of Figure 1. Each data is the means and standard deviations (n = 3).

24 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 25 of 33

456

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 1. (Chen et al.)

R etention R atio (% )

B)

100 80

b

b

a

60 40 20 0

Complex I

Complex II

457 458

25 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Complex III

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 2. (Chen et al.)

Z -average diam ter (nm )

A)

1000 c

800 600 400

b

200 a

B

20 SPI SPI-cur complex SPI-cur-SSPS complex SSPS

10

ξ-potential (mV)

459

Page 26 of 33

0

-10 -20 -30

b

b

c c a

-50

SPI

Complex-I Complex-II Complex-III

d

0

-40

a

d

pH 7.0

460 461

26 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

a

pH 4.0

Page 27 of 33

462

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 3. (Chen et al.)

A

C

463

27 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

B

D

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

464

Page 28 of 33

Fig. 4. (Chen et al.)

F

1062

1546

1645

1063

E

1546 1642

D 1650

1543

C 1541

1650

B

1057

1630

A

2000

1205

1601

1800

1600

1400

1200 -1

Wavenumbers(cm )

465 466

28 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

1000

Page 29 of 33

467

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 5. (Chen et al.)

468 469 470

29 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 6. (Chen et al.)

Bioaceessibility of curcumin (%)

A

70

a

a a

60

B Curcumin retention (%)

471

Page 30 of 33

50 40 30 20 10 0

Complex-I

Complex-II

Complex-III

Complex-I Complex-II Complex-III

100

90

80

70

60 0.0

pepsin digestion 0.5

472 473

30 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

pancreatin digestion

1.0

1.5

2.0

Digestion Time (h)

2.5

3.0

Page 31 of 33

474

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fig. 7. (Chen et al.)

Curcumin release (%)

100 Complex-I Complex-II Complex-III

80 60 40 20 0 0

475

5

10

15

20

Time (h)

476

31 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

477

Fig. 8. (Chen et al.)

Curcumin Retention (%)

100

-0.067x y=98.02e

80 -0.186x y=98.621e

60 -0.353x y=91.403e

complex-I complex-II complex-III free curcumin

40 20 0 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Time (h)

478 479

32 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

3.0

Page 32 of 33

Page 33 of 33

480

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

TOC Graphic

481

482

33 Environment ACS Paragon Plus