Density Measurements of 2-Propanol Solutions in Supercritical CO2

Synthetic Biology Cracks Blue Rose Case. For the FBI investigators of David Lynch's Twin Peaks television series, “blue rose” cases ...
0 downloads 0 Views 28KB Size
J. Chem. Eng. Data 2001, 46, 873-874

873

Density Measurements of 2-Propanol Solutions in Supercritical CO2 Horng J. Dai Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996

Kevin D. Heath Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996

Hank D. Cochran* Chemical Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

J. Michael Simonson Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

Using a vibrating-tube densitometer, densities of 2-propanol solutions with compositions between (0.72 and 1.89) mol % in supercritical CO2 have been measured isothermally at (40, 50, 60, and 70) °C at pressures to 34.47 MPa. These measurements span the temperature and pressure ranges of earlier neutron scattering studies of the supercritical CO2 fluids, and density data are needed to interpret the results. In addition, these results should aid in using supercritical CO2 for separation or processing with 2-propanol and for improving the broad database supporting supercritical fluid technologies in general.

Introduction Carbon dioxide is nonflammable, nontoxic, naturally occurring, and inexpensive. Above its critical pressure (Pc ) 7.3 MPa) and temperature (Tc ) 31 °C), CO2 has properties intermediate between those of a gas and a liquid, that is, high density and low viscosity. Because of these attributes, supercritical fluid (SCF) CO2 has been proposed as an environmentally benign replacement for the organic solvents currently used in many industrial synthesis and separation processes. High-pressure thermodynamic data, especially densities of low-volatile compounds in a supercritical fluid, are among the important and fundamental parameters for SCF process design but have not been investigated for many systems of interest. The low molecular weight alcohols are among the most important compounds in separation processes. They are often used as entrainers to control the polarity of a SCF solvent in extraction applications and are also used as modifiers in SCF chromatography. In particular, the application of supercritical gases to separate alcohol from water1,2 has received some attention because the conventional distillation methods are very energy intensive. In previous studies,3,4 the solubilities and vapor-liquid equilibria of the low molecular weight alcohols in supercritical CO2 have been reported. However, systematic measurements of the density of these systems have not been made. These results are important in applying supercritical CO2 for separation or processing with these compounds. Experimental Section Since a detailed description of the experimental apparatus in this study can be found elsewhere,5 it is only * Corresponding author: Fax: 865-241-4289. E-mail: [email protected].

briefly described here. All of the results reported here were obtained as density difference, δF, between SCF and an appropriate reference fluid (pure CO2) using a vibratingtube densitometer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). δF was measured with a Paar DMA 60 and 512 HP remote cell with a stainless steel jacket through which thermostated water was circulated. The temperature of the densitometer was maintained within (0.1 °C and monitored with a calibrated 100 Ω platinum resistance thermometer (RTD). A stainless steel sample cell of 25 mL was used to prepare the solutions. The cell was initially loaded with a measured amount of 2-propanol (IPA) (Aldrich, 99% pure, used as received) and then immersed in an ice + water bath. CO2 was transferred into the cell until the desired concentration was reached. Before delivering the solution to the densitometer, the pressure of the sample cell was measured at the experimental temperature to ensure supercritical solution and miscibility of IPA in CO2. A transducer from Precise Sensors with an accuracy of δp/ pmax) 10-3, where pmax is the upper pressure bound of the transducer (103.4 MPa), was used for the pressure measurement. The difference in density δF of fluids contained in the vibrating tube is related to the oscillation period τ of the densitometer as

δF ) F1 - F2 ) κ(τ12 - τ22)

(1)

where Fi and τi are the density and oscillation period of material i, respectively, and the proportionality constant κ is dependent on the temperature and pressure and may be determined by measuring τ for two reference fluids of known density with a vibrating-tube densitometer at the

10.1021/je000373f CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society Published on Web 05/11/2001

874

Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2001

Table 1. Density Results of 2-Propanol (1) Solutions in CO2 (2) at Various Concentrations and Temperatures F/g‚cm-3 x1

P/MPa

T ) 40 °C

T ) 50 °C

T ) 60 °C

T ) 70 °C

0.0072

34.47 27.58 20.68 13.79 10.34 6.89 34.47 27.58 20.68 13.79 10.34 6.89 34.47 27.58 20.68 13.79 10.34 6.89 34.47 27.58 20.68 13.79 10.34 6.89

0.9322 0.8969 0.8490 0.7674 0.6704 0.1984 0.9318 0.8968 0.8491 0.7685 0.6743

0.8965 0.8554 0.7963 0.6782 0.4548 0.1699 0.8964 0.8558 0.7974 0.6816 0.4663 0.1716 0.8964 0.8566 0.8000 0.6890 0.4907 0.1730 0.8962 0.8568 0.8009 0.6935 0.5036 0.1744

0.8606 0.8128 0.7403 0.5674 0.3235 0.1539 0.8605 0.8134 0.7417 0.5722 0.3289 0.1550 0.8611 0.8151 0.7458 0.5833 0.3389 0.1563 0.8608 0.8152 0.7468 0.5891 0.3444 0.1581

0.8233 0.7681 0.6693 0.4653 0.2699 0.1421 0.8235 0.7693 0.6826 0.4640 0.2714 0.1428 0.8242 0.7712 0.6868 0.4746 0.2773 0.1436 0.8245 0.7720 0.6890 0.4788 0.2775 0.1453

0.0102

0.0152

0.0187

0.9311 0.8969 0.8507 0.7740 0.6841 0.9307 0.8970 0.8515 0.7766 0.6937

appropriate temperature and pressure:

κ ) (F0 - F2)/(τ02 - τ22)

(2)

The vibrating-tube densitometer gives the relative density between a fluid of unknown density and a reference fluid, so the accuracy of the density measurements is dependent both on the accuracy of the measured τ for the two fluids and on the accuracy of the reference-fluid densities F0 and F2. Highly pure CO2 was used as one density standard at all conditions of this study while Ar was used as the complementary reference fluid. Densities of CO2 and Ar were obtained from the NIST Thermophysical Properties of Pure Fluids Database.6 Values for κ calculated from this pair were fit as a cubic function of temperature with reduced weight assigned to the T ) 40 °C (CO2 + Ar) pair due to lower confidence in the calculated density of CO2 at this temperature. The calibration constant κ for the apparatus used in this study was found to be independent of pressure within experimental uncertainty in the calibration measurements. As a result, the following relationship was found to best fit our calibration data:

κ ) (1.635-2.34 × 10-9)T3

(3)

where T is in Kelvin.

Figure 1. Density results of 1.52 mol % 2-propanol solution in CO2: O, 40 °C; 0, 50 °C; b, 60 °C; 9, 70 °C.

1.52, and 1.87) mol % in CO2 are shown in Table 1, and typical density isotherms of the solutions are shown in Figure 1, where densities of 1.52 mol % solution are plotted as a function of pressure. The reproducibility of the results from repeated measurements of τ is generally within (3 × 10-6, resulting in a density uncertainty of (0.0001 g‚cm-3. The reported data are the average of the upper and lower limits of the calculated density. In addition, measurements were also made at 6.89 MPa, which is below the critical pressure of CO2. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the Division of Chemical Sciences of the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). ORNL is operated for the DOE by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract no. DEACO5-00OR 22725. Literature Cited (1) Paulaitis, M. E.; Kander, R. G.; DiAndreth, J. R. Ber. BunsenGes. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 869-875. (2) Kander, R. G.; Paulaitis, M. E. AICHE Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1984; American Institute of Chemical Engineers: New York; p 84b. (3) Suzuki, T.; Tsuge, N.; Nagahama, K. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1991, 67, 213-226. (4) Radosz, M. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1986, 31, 43-45. (5) Simonson, J. M.; Oakes, C. S.; Bodnar, R. J. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1994, 26, 345-359. (6) NIST Thermophysical Properties of Pure Fluids Database; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Washington, DC.

Results Density data obtained at (40, 50, 60, and 70) °C from four 2-propanol solutions with concentrations of (0.72, 1.02,

Received for review December 6, 2000. Accepted March 27, 2001.

JE000373F