Determination of the Geographical and Botanical Origin of Hops

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LIBRARIES

Article

Determination of the geographical origin of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) using stable isotopes of C, N and S Miha Ocvirk, Nives Ogrinc, and Iztok Joze Kosir J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b06010 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Feb 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 6, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 23

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Determination of the Geographical and Botanical Origin of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Using Stable Isotopes of C, N and S Miha Ocvirk1, Nives Ogrinc2, Iztok Jože Košir1* 1

Institute for Hop Research and Brewing, Cesta Žalskega Tabora 2, SI-3310 Žalec, Slovenia

2

Department of Environmental Sciences, “J. Stefan” Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana,

Slovenia *Corresponding author. Tel: 00386 371 21 608, E-mail address: [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 23

1

ABSTRACT: A need exists for a reliable method for determining the geographical and

2

botanical origin of hops. For this study three sets of samples were collected: the first set

3

comprised five German samples, the second set comprised samples of hops from ten of the

4

world’s major hop growing regions while the third comprised the four main Slovenian. The

5

samples were analyzed using Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) to obtain δ13C, δ15N

6

and δ34S values. The δ15N (2.2 ‰ to 8.4 ‰) and δ34S (0.7 ‰ to 12.3 ‰) values were the most

7

discriminating parameters for classifying hop according to geographical origin. ANOVA

8

showed distinct groupings for eight out of the ten hop-growing regions. Although it was not

9

possible to distinguish the geographical origin of hops based on δ13C (-28.9 ‰ to -24.7 ‰), in

10

the case of botanical origin, δ13C values proved to be the most discriminative albeit with

11

limited success.

12

Keywords: Hop (Humulus lupulus L.), IRMS, geographical origin, botanical origin, isotopic

13

ratio


Page 3 of 23


14

INTRODUCTION

15

The contents and composition of bitter resins and essential oils in hop (Humulus Lupulus L.)

16

depend on its variety and on the environmental conditions during growth, both of which can

17

vary greatly.1,2 Optimal growth of the hop is achieved at temperatures between 15 to 18 °C,

18

with a sufficient water supply and medium to deep soils.3 For these reasons most of the

19

world's production of hop occurs close to the 48th parallel north although there are also large

20

hop growing areas in the southern hemisphere, e.g., New Zealand and South African

21

Republic.

22

Since every brand of beer has its own recipe, it is important for brewers to be sure of the

23

authenticity of their hops in order to maintain product quality. In addition, fraud with regard

24

to basic harvest data, such as mislabeling of plant species or varieties, year of production and

25

geographical origin is becoming an increasing problem globally.4-6 This has created a real

26

need for new robust tools for determining the geographical origin and variety of hop.

27

Classical chemical methods can be used to determine a wide range of parameters but these

28

provide only limited information for discerning geographical origin.7 It is important to

29

mention, that in the field of hop, great efforts and accomplished a great deal in overcoming

30

this problem was done by official certification schemes for hop and hop products.8 To date,

31

only a few studies have been published on the botanical authentication of hops, based on the

32

analyses of their metabolites, which are genetically and botanically influenced.9-11 The main

33

disadvantage of metabolomics is its low sensitivity and in practice such methods are only

34

capable of detecting the addition of 10 % or more of different hop varieties. Measuring the

35

differences in isotopic composition using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), on the

36

other hand, has proved to be a valuable and efficient method for controlling the authenticity of

37

food and beverages.12,13 Stable isotopes can also be used to determine illegal or undeclared

38

additions (adulteration), which is another common fraud.12 Most studies on authentication



Page 4 of 23

39

focus on differences in the stable-isotope ratios of light elements H, C, N, O and S. According

40

to the photosynthetic pathways used to fix CO2, plant species belong to three categories:

41

Calvin cycle plants (C3), the Hatch_Slack cycle plants (C4) and Crassulacean acid

42

metabolism plants (CAM). The hop is a C3 plant and has a δ13C between -29 ‰ and -23 ‰.12

43

Similarly, the stable isotopic composition of nitrogen (δ15N) and sulfur (δ34S), the two of the

44

main soil nutrients,14,15 are mainly influenced by the isotopic composition of nitrate as

45

ammonia and sulfur in the soil, which in turn depend on climatic and geographic

46

conditions.7,12 Factors, such as soil depth, vegetation type, and climate can affect soil

47

processes, such as mineralization, nitrification, volatilization and nitrate reduction, which also

48

results in a measurable isotopic fractionation.16 Usually, the analyses of single isotope ratios

49

cannot provide satisfactory results for determining geographical origin and two or more

50

isotope ratios of elements are required.7,17

51

Stable isotopes were first applied in the determination of food quality in the mid 70’s as a way

52

of detecting the adulteration of honey with exogenous (low-cost) sugars.18 Since then, it has

53

become widely used in agricultural and food science.16 For example Košir et al. (2001), used

54

IRMS in combination with chemometrics to determine the geographical origin of wines.19,20

55

Hrastar et al. (2009) classified Camelina sativa oil according to geographical origin using

56

13C values.21 Angerosa et al. (1999) used stable isotope ratios of 13C and 18O to establish

57

the geographical origin of olive oils22 while Potočnik et al. (2016) used 13C values to

58

determine the geographical origin and adulteration of pumpkin seed oil.23 IRMS has also been

59

used to determine the geographical origin of dairy products, meat products, vegetables and

60

fruit juices.16,17,24,25

61

To the authors knowledge there has only been one study using IRMS to determine the

62

geographical origin of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.)26, which was based on only two samples

63

from eight growing regions excluding New Zealand and South African Republic. For this


Page 5 of 23


64

reason, we chose to study δ13C, δ15N and δ34S values of hops and hop products from all of the

65

world's main growing regions to verify their geographical origin, and, in addition, to see if

66

these stable isotopes can be used to distinguish between the major varieties of hop plants

67

produced in Slovenia. The aim of this study was to find out if knowing the δ13C, δ15N, and

68

δ34S values could be a useful tool for discriminating between the geographical and botanical

69

origin of hop.

70 71

MATERIALS AND METHODS

72

Chemicals

73

Toluene 99.7 %, methanol (HPLC grade) 99.9 %, lead acetate trihydrate 99.9 % and glacial

74

acetic acid 99.9 % were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). International reference

75

materials: IAEA-CH-7 (polyethylene), IAEA-CH-6 (sucrose), IAEA-N-1 (ammonium

76

sulfate), IAEA-N-2 (ammonium sulfate), IAEA-S-5 (barium sulfate) and NBS 127 (barium

77

sulfate) were purchased by International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, Vienna (Austria).

78

Sampling

79

For this study, three sets of hop samples were collected. The first set of samples comprised

80

five samples of hop cones, pellets (type 45 or 90) and hop extracts from the German hop-

81

growing region of Hallertau. Each set of five samples (cones, pellets and extracts) was

82

prepared from the same sample of hop cones. Two additional samples of hop cones were

83

separated into the green parts of the cones, lupulin and essential oils. The second set of hop

84

cones are representative of the major hop-growing regions of the World: Yakima (USA_Y)

85

and Great Lakes (USA_GL) region in the USA, Australia (AUS), New Zealand (NZL),

86

Republic of South Africa (RSA), Great Britain (GB), Germany (GER), Austria (AUT), Czech

87

Republic (CZ) and Slovenia (SLO). In total, this amounted to 77 different samples. The third 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 6 of 23

88

set includes samples of hop cones from Slovenian hop growers and comprised 24 samples of

89

traditional Slovenian hop varieties including Aurora (AU), Bobek (BO), Celeia (CE) and

90

Savinjski Golding (SG). All samples were collected at optimal maturity during the 2014

91

harvesting season. These samples were used to study isotopic variations in hop varieties from

92

the same geographical area as well as to discriminate hop samples according to geographical

93

origin.

94

First, the alpha-acids content was determined by measuring the lead conductance values

95

(LCV) of the hops according to the Analytica – EBC 7.4 method.27 Briefly, bitter substances

96

were extracted from the hops with toluene (100 mL). Then, 10 mL of the toluene extract was

97

diluted with 30 mL of methanol and titrated conductometrically (Methrom, Switzerland) with

98

a lead acetate solution (7.59 % PbAc) in methanol containing glacial acetic acid (50 %).

99

Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) 13

C/12C,

15

N/14N and

34

S/32S ratios were determined using IRMS. A known

100

In hop samples

101

amount of powdered hop sample (5 mg) was weighed into a tin capsule, closed with tweezers

102

and placed into the automatic sampler of the elemental analyzer. All stable C, N and S isotope

103

analyses were performed simultaneously using an IRMS IsoPrime 100 - Vario PYRO Cube

104

(OH/CNS Pyrolyser/Elemental Analyser; Elementar UK Ltd, Manchester, UK). Isotope data

105

are expressed using the conventional δ-notation using the general formula:

106

δiE = (R(iE/jE)sample / R(iE/jE)standard) - 1

107

Where E is the element (C, N, S), R is the isotope ratio between the heavier “i” and the lighter

108

“j” isotope (13C/12C,

109

recognized reference standard. The δ-values are multiplied by 1000 and expressed in units

110

“per mil” (‰).28 For carbon, we used the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) as the reference

111

standard, for nitrogen we used atmospheric N2 (air), while for sulfur we used the Vienna-

15

N/14N,

34

S/32S) in the sample and in the relevant internationally


Page 7 of 23


112

Canyon Diablo Troilite (V-CDT) standard. The results were calibrated against the following

113

international reference materials: IAEA-CH-7 (polyethylene; δ13C = -32.15 ±0.05 ‰) and

114

IAEA-CH-6 (sucrose; δ13C = -10.45 ±0.03 ‰) for carbon; IAEA-N-1 (ammonium sulfate;

115

δ15N = 0.4 ±0.2 ‰) and IAEA-N-2 (ammonium sulfate; δ15N = 20.3 ±0.2 ‰) for nitrogen;

116

IAEA-S-5 (barium sulfate; δ34S = -0.4 ±0.2 ‰) and NBS 127 (barium sulfate; δ34S = 20.3

117

±0.4 ‰) for sulfur with added vanadium pentoxide (International Atomic Energy Agency

118

IAEA, Vienna, Austria). Reproducibility of the measurements was ±0.2 ‰ for δ13C and ±0.3

119

‰ for δ15N and δ34S.

120

Statistical Data analysis

121

Microsoft’s Excel software (Microsoft, USA) was used to perform basic univariate statistics

122

while a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Duncan test (P = 0.05) was performed

123

using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corporation, USA).

124

125

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

126

On the market, hops can be in various forms, e.g., cones, different pellet types, and as

127

extracts. The first question is, therefore, does the stable isotope ratios remain the same when

128

hop cones are processed or does each fraction: green parts of the cones, lupulin, and essential

129

oils differ isotopically? To answer this, we collected samples consisting of hop cones, extracts

130

and pellets produced from the same variety and separated from the hop cones the lupulin and

131

the essential oils. For each fraction, we determined and compared the δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S

132

values (data not shown). The results reveal that there is no statistically significant difference

133

in the isotopic composition between the hop products made from the same cones. We also

134

studied different varieties of hops with differing alpha-acid contents (4.1 % to 13.2 %). The



Page 8 of 23

135

data (not shown) reveals that the bitter resin and essential oil content does not affect the

136

isotopic ratios. The alpha-acid contents are not shown here and further on in the manuscript.

137

Geographical origin

138

We described each data set using the three parameters: δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S. For the second

139

set of samples, covering all the major hop-growing regions of the World, we grouped the

140

results of the univariate statistical analysis according to their geographical origin independent

141

of variety (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the distribution of the mean δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S values.

142

In the Southern Hemisphere, the δ34S values are significantly higher than in the samples in the

143

Northern Hemisphere. The δ15N values of hops from the USA (2.2 ‰ to 4.7 ‰) are lower in

144

the European samples (3.3 ‰ to 8.4 ‰). The lowest mean value of δ13C (-27.9 ‰) and the

145

highest mean value of δ34S (10.9 ‰) were found in the South African samples. The results of

146

ANOVA comparison (Table 1) reveals that the best discrimination between samples from

147

different regions is achieved using δ34S, followed by δ15N. The δ13C values enabled only

148

partial discrimination of the CZ and RSA samples.

149

All possible combinations of scatter plots of C/N and C/S were prepared. Figure 2 shows a

150

scatter plot of δ15N vs. δ34S for the whole data set. The plot shows how samples from AUS,

151

NZL, RSA, USA_GL and CZ form distinct groups, while in the center are groups of samples

152

from other regions where, although they overlap, some clustering is noticeable. These include

153

samples from AUT, GER, USA_Y and SLO. Samples from USA_Y and SLO overlap, despite

154

the large geographical distance between them. The samples from GB are scattered. Groups of

155

samples from GER, AUT, SLO and CZ are closer together, which we expect since they are

156

neighboring regions within central Europe. It is interesting that samples from the two major

157

hop growing regions in the US: Yakima valley and the Great lakes, form distinct groups. This

158

is also not surprising since the geographical difference between them is around 2500 km and

159

we expect there to be different pedoclimatic conditions. For more clarity, we put together all


Page 9 of 23


160

samples from Europe to see if it is possible to differentiate between hop samples from Europe

161

and other parts of the world. Figure 3 shows almost complete separation of the groups with

162

the exception of samples from the USA_Y that overlap with the European samples. We then

163

focused on hop samples from Europe only, since geographically these regions are closest to

164

one another. All samples group according to their country of origin except for samples from

165

GB, which are scattered, although they all originated from the same region i.e. Kent (Figure

166

4).

167

We also applied the same methodology to Slovenian hop samples collected for the purpose of

168

determining botanical origin and were obtained directly from the hop growers to be sure of

169

varietal purity. The Student’s t-test analysis shows no significant difference between both

170

groups of samples for all three measured parameters.

171

Clearly, isotopic ratios can act as fingerprints for different growing regions from around the

172

world and it is possible to observe clustering of hop samples based on significant differences

173

between growing regions that result in large variations in δ15N and δ34S values. The δ13C

174

values are closer together (mean: -26.6 ±0.9 ‰) and are the least discriminative, which agrees

175

with the fact that δ13C values are biologically conditioned rather than environmentally.

176

Botanical origin

177

In this study, we also wanted to see if there is any isotopic differentiation of hop samples

178

according to variety. For this, we included only samples from Slovenia to exclude

179

environmental factors, since hop production in Slovenia is limited to a small central region

180

covering only 50 km2. The hop samples belong to four of the most important varieties:

181

Savinjski golding (SG), Bobek (BO), Aurora (AU) and Celeia (CE). The results are presented

182

in Table 2. A one-way ANOVA analysis reveals that δ34S has little discriminating power

183

regarding variety. This is expected, since the δ34S values are predominantly environmentally

184

influenced. The δ13C and δ15N similar to δ34S values did not show a strong discriminating



Page 10 of 23

185

power with regards to botanical origin. It was also not possible to distinguish between SG and

186

CE, whereas AU and BO did form two distinct groups. These results are also in line with the

187

fact that CE is bred from the SG variety. Overall, our results reveal a limited capacity for

188

δ13C, δ15N and δ34S values for differentiating between different varieties of hop. This also

189

agrees with previous research on other plant species and products such as wine, camelina and

190

pumpkin seed oil and edible oils, fruit juices and honey. In all cases, using stable isotopic

191

values it is only possible to distinguish between different plant species, geographical origin,

192

and in some cases year of production whereas separation according to variety was either

193

limited or impossible.19-21,23

194

In conclusion, we can say that the use of stable isotopes ratios of δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S could

195

be used as a new powerful tool for differentiating hops according to geographical origin and

196

can be of use to the brewing industry or to hop traders in resolving issues relating to

197

authenticity. The methodology is straightforward, fast and cheap, relative to standard GC or

198

HPLC techniques and does not need any special sample pretreatment except for weighing the

199

samples. In the case of botanical origin, the same methodology gives only limited success. In

200

the future, we plan to complete this research by obtaining δ18O and δ2H values and by

201

applying Pb isotope analysis. The levels of all three elements relate to the conditions in the

202

environment and therefore, we expect them to provide better geographical differentiation of

203

hop products.

204 205

FUNDING SOURCES

206

This work was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency by grant 020-2/2011-

207

3. The study is part of two EU projects: MASSTWIN - Spreading excellence and widening

208

participation in support of mass spectrometry and related techniques in health, the

209

environment and food analysis (H2020, grant agreement no. 692241) and ERA Chair ISO-


Page 11 of 23


210

FOOD - for isotope techniques in food quality, safety and traceability (FP7, Grant agreement

211

no: 621329).

212

SUPPORTING INFORMATIONS. Two scatterplots (C/N and C/S).



Page 12 of 23

213

REFERENCES:

214

1. Belitz, H.D.; Grosch, W.; Schieberle, P. Food Chemistry. 4th revised and extended ed.

215

Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; 894 – 895.

216

2. Reglitz, K.; Steinhaus, M. Quantitation of 4-Methyl-4-sulfanylpentan-2-one (4MSP) in

217

Hops by a Stable Isotope Dilution Assay in Combination with GCxGC-TOFMS:Method

218

Development and Application To Study the Influence of Variety, Provenance, Harvest Year

219

and Processing on 4MSP. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2364–2372.

220

3. Inštitut za hmeljarstvo in pivovarstvo. Agroekološki pogoji za vzgojo hmelja in Priročnik

221

za hmeljarje: Inštitut za hmeljarstvo in pivovarstvo Žalec: Žalec, Slovenia, 2002; 27-29.

222

4. Yan, Z.; Bin, Z.; Gang, C.; Ailiang, C.; Shumin, Y.; Zhihua, Y. Recent developments in

223

application of stable isotope analysis on agro-product authenticity and traceability. Food

224

Chem. 2014, 145, 300-305.

225

5. Longobardi, F.; Casiello, G.; Cortese, M.; Perini, M.; Camin, F.; Catucci, L.: Agostiano, A.

226

Discrimination of geographical origin of lentis (Lens culinaris Medik.) using isotope ratio

227

mass spectrometry combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 343-349.

228

6. Laursen, K.H.; Schjoerringa, J.K.; Kellyb, S.D.; Husteda, S. Authentication of organically

229

grown plants – advantages and limitations of atomic spectroscopy for multi-element and

230

stable isotope analysis. Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 59, 73–82.

231

7. Förstel, H. The natural fingerprint of stable isotopes-use of IRMS to test food authenticity.

232

Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388, 541-544.


Page 13 of 23


233

8. European Union. Commission regulation (EC) No 1850/2006, Laying down detailed rules

234

for the certification of hops and hop products. Official Journal of the European Communities.

235

2006, OJ L 355, 72-87.

236

9. Olšovská, J.; Krofta, K.; Jandovská, V.; Patzak, J.; Štěrba, K. Methods for verifying the

237

authenticity of hops – an effective tool against falsifi cation. Kvasny Prum. 2016, 62, 294-305.

238

10. Ocvirk, M.; Košir, I.J.; Grdadolnik, J. Determination of the botanical origin of hops

239

(Humulus lupulus L.) using different analytical techniques in combination with statistical

240

methods. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 452-461.

241

11. Kač, M.; Kovačevič, M. Presentation and determination of hop (Humulus lupulus L.)

242

cultivars by a min-max model on composition of hop essential oil. Monatsschr. Brauwiss.

243

2000, 53, 180–184.

244

12. Costinel, D.; Ionete, R.E.; Dincǎ, O.R.; Popescu, R.; Geanǎ, E.I. IRMS Methods for

245

assessing the quality and origin of honey using and isotopic fingerprints. Prog.

246

Cryog. Isot. Sep. 2014, 17, 25-34.

247

13. Kim, H.; Kumar, S.; Shin, K.H. Applicability of stable C ad N isotope analysis in

248

inferring the geographical origin and authentication of commercial fish (Mackerel. Yelow

249

Croaker and Pollock). Food Chem. 2015, 172, 523-52.

250

14. Thode, H.G. Sulfur isotope geochemistry and fractionation between coexisting sulfide

251

minerals. Mineral. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap. 1970, 3, 133-144.

252

15. Rodrigues, A.L.; Rossete, M.; CarneiroI, J.M.T.; Filho, C.R.S.A.; Bendassolli, J.A.

253

Isotope determination of sulfur by mass spectrometry in soil samples. R. Bras. Ci. Solo. 2012,

254

36, 1787-1793.



Page 14 of 23

255

16. Van Leeuwen, K.; Prenzler, P.D.; Ryan, D.; Camin, F. Gas chromatography-combustion

256

isotope ratio mass spectrometry for traceability and authenticity in foods and beverages.

257

Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 814-837.

258

17. Luo, D.; Dong, H.; Luo, H.; Xian, Y.; Wan, J.; Guo, X.; Wu, Y. The application of stable

259

isotope ratio analysis to determine the geographical origin of wheat. Food Chem. 2015, 174,

260

197-201.

261

18. Doner, L.W.; White, J.W. Carbon-13/carbon-12 ratio is relatively uniform among honeys.

262

Sci. 1977, 197, 891-892.

263

19. Košir, I.J.; Kocjančič, M.; Ogrinc, N.; Kidrič, J. Use of SNIF-NMR and IRMS in

264

combination with chemometric methods for the determination of captalisation and

265

geographical origin of wines (the example slovenian wines). Anal. Chim. Acta. 2001, 429,

266

195-206.

267

20. Košir, I.J.; Kocjančič, M.; Ogrinc, N.; Kidrič, J. Determination of Authenitcity. Regional

268

origin and vintage of slovenian wines using a combination of IRMS and SNIF NMR analyses.

269

J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1432-40.

270

21. Hrastar, R.; Petrišič, M.G.; Ogrinc, N.; Košir, I.J. Fatty Acid and Stable Carbon Isotope

271

Characterization of Camelina sativa Oil: Implications for Authentication. J. Agric. Food

272

Chem. 2009, 57, 579-585.

273

22. Angerosa, F.; Breas, O.; Contento, S.; Guillou, C.; Reniero, F.; Sada, E. Application of

274

stable isotope ratio analysis to the characterization of the geographical origin of olive oils. J.

275

Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1013-1017.

276

23. Potočnik. T.; Ogrinc. N.; Potočnik. D.; Košir, I.J. Fatty acid composition and δ13C

277

isotopic ratio characterisation of pumpkin seed oil. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2016, 53, 85-908. 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 23


278

24. Rodriguesa, C.I.; Maiaa, R.; Mirandab, M.; Ribeirinhob, M.; Nogueirac, J.M.F.; Máguasa,

279

C. Stable isotope analysis for green coffee bean: A possible method for geographic origin

280

discrimination. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 22, 463-471.

281

25. Ogrinc, N.; Bat, K.; Košir, I.J.; Golob, T.; Kokkinofta, R. Characterization of Commercial

282

Slovenian and Cypriot Fruit Juices Using Stable Isotopes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57,

283

6764–6769.

284

26. Schmidt R.; Kutsch, A.; Roßman A. Geographical origin of hops - determination by

285

isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Proceedings of the Scientific Commission IHGC.

286

2009, 107.

287

27. European Brewery Convention. Analytica-EBC. Section 7 – Hops. Method 7.4 Lead

288

Conductance Value of Hops Powders and Pellets. Fachverlag Hans Carl: Nürnberg. Germany,

289

2000.

290

28. Coplen T.B. Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and

291

gas-ratio measurement results. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 25, 2538-2560.



Page 16 of 23

292

FIGURE CAPTIONS

293

Figure 1. Distribution of the mean values of δ13C, δ15N and δ34S in hops according to growing

294

regions in the northern and southern hemisphere.

295

Figure 2. Scatter plot of δ15N and δ34S values of samples from 10 major hop-growing regions

296

worldwide. Samples are marked as in the section materials and methods – sampling.

297

Figure 3. Scatter plot of δ15N and δ34S comparing samples of hops from Europe with other

298

major hop-growing regions worldwide. Samples are marked as in the section materials and

299

methods – sampling.

300

Figure 4. Scatter plot of δ15N and δ34S values in European hop samples. Samples are marked

301

as in the section materials and methods – sampling.

302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317


Page 17 of 23


TABLES Table 1. Number of samples, Mean, Standard deviation, minimum value, maximum value and grouping of the samples. Mean

n

‰

Minimum Maximum

S.D.

‰

Groupsa

‰

δ13C(‰) AUT

8

-27.3

0.9

-28.9

-26.2

ab

CZ

3

-26.0

1.3

-27.2

-24.7

d

GER

23

-26.3

0.8

-27.9

-24.9

bcd

SLO

16

-26.6

0.7

-27.5

-25.1

bcd

USA_Y

4

-26.5

0.4

-26.9

-25.8

bcd

USA_GL

6

-26.2

0.8

-27.6

-25.1

bcd

GB

4

-27.2

-28.1

-26.7

abc

RSA

5

-27.9

0.6 0.7

-28.9

-27.1

a

NZL AUS

6 2

-26.1

0.5

-26.9

-26.7

0.3

-27.1

-25.4 -26.4

cd bcd

AUT

8

4.6

0.9

3.3

6.3

b

CZ

3

8.0

0.5

7.5

8.4

e

GER

23

5.9

0.6

4.8

7.2

d

SLO

16

4.7

0.6

3.7

5.6

bc

USA_Y

4

3.9

0.5

3.4

4.7

ab

USA_GL

6

3.0

0.8

4.6

a

GB

4

5.1

1.3

2.2 3.7

7.4

cd

RSA

5

4.9

0.8

3.8

6.1

bcd

NZL

6

3.3

2.8

4.1

a

AUS

2

7.3

0.4 0.3

7.0

7.5

e

AUT

8

7.2

1.1

5.4

8.9

e

CZ

3

4.4

0.75

3.6

5.0

cd

GER

23

5.3

0.7

4.1

6.8

d

SLO

16

4.0

0.7

2.7

4.8

bc

USA_Y

4

4.0

0.4

3.5

4.4

bc

USA_GL

6

2.1

1.1

3.8

a

GB

4

3.2

0.5

0.7 2.5

3.7

b

RSA

5

10.9

0.8

10.0

12.3

g

NZL

6

9.2

8.5

10.5

f

AUS 2 ANOVA, p=0.05

8.6

0.7 0.7

7.9

9.3

f

15

δ N(‰)

34

δ S(‰)

a



Page 18 of 23

Table 2. Number of samples, Mean, Standard deviation, minimum value, maximum value and grouping of the Slovenian samples. Mean

n

‰

Minimum Maximum Groupsa

S.D.

‰

‰

15

δ N(‰) SG

6

5.6

0.9

3.8

6.7

ab

BO

6

4.7

4.3

6.1

a

AU

6

5.9

0.7 1.1

4.3

7.9

b

CE

6

4.9

0.7

3.7

5.5

ab

SG

6

-26.8

0.2

-27.0

-26.5

c

BO

6

-27.2

0.2

-27.5

-26.9

a

AU

6

-26.4

0.3

-26.8

-25.9

b

CE

6

-26.3

0.3

-26.6

-25.8

c

SG

6

3.2

1.7

1.4

6.1

a

BO

6

4.0

0.7

3.1

4.8

a

AU

6

4.6

1.1

2.6

6.1

a

CE 6 ANOVA, p=0.05

3.4

0.7

2.4

3.9

a

13

δ C(‰)

δ34S(‰)

a


Page 19 of 23


Figure graphics Figure 1



Page 20 of 23

Figure 2


Page 21 of 23


Figure 3.



Page 22 of 23

Figure 4.


Page 23 of 23


TOC graphic


Determination of the Geographical and Botanical Origin of Hops

Recommend Documents