Chapter
21
Detoxification of Mycotoxins by Insects
Downloaded by PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on August 2, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 22, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0505.ch021
Patrick F. Dowd Mycotoxin Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1815 North University Street, Peoria, IL 61604
Resistance to aflatoxin B1 in Drosophila melanogaster is conferred by at least two chromosomes and cytoplasmic factors, and it is thought that unspecific monooxygenases may be involved. Resistance to α-amanitin in D. melanogaster is due to an altered target site, RNA polymerase II. Relative resistance to aflatoxin B and griseofulvin in Spodoptera frugiperda is due to lower rates of activation and higher rates of detoxificatian compared to Helicoverpa zea. Fungus-feeding larvae of Carpophilus hemipterus are able to hydrolyze a model trichothecene substrate at about 10-fold the rate of H. zea and S. frugiperda. 1
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungi t h a t are t o x i c t o animals, i n c l u d i n g humans. They represent j u s t a small p o r t i o n o f the many secondary metabolites produced by fungi ( 1 , 2 ) . Most mycotoxins are produced by molds i n the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium. Some represent a t i v e s and t h e i r effects are l i s t e d i n Table I , and cxsrresponding structures are shown i n Figure 1. Unlike p l a n t secondary metabolites, the r e c o g n i t i o n t h a t fungal secondary metabolites such as mycotoxins can a c t as defensive substances has occurred only r e c e n t l y (3). Nevertheless, the e f f e c t s o f s e v e r a l mycotoxins on i n s e c t s have been studied t o some degree (see reviews 4 , 5 ) . Studies on i n s e c t s have been prompted by d e s i r e s t o examine the defensive c a p a b i l i t i e s o f mycotoxins, t o t e s t i n s e c t s as a l t e r n a t i v e bioassay i n d i c a t o r s , and t o search f o r new i n s e c t i c i d e s or novel b i o a c t i v e metabolites t h a t provide leads for new i n s e c t i c i d e s .
This chapter not subject to U.S. copyright Published 1992 American Chemical Society
In Molecular Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance; Mullin, C., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.
DOWD
Detoxification of Mycotoxins by Insects
jfX
OCH
Downloaded by PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on August 2, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 22, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0505.ch021
P°X
V ^ C H
H
OCH,
o o
OHO
C
3
CI
* PCH,
CH 0 3
HO
CH CH OH
C
H
3
° ~
3
C
° ~
H
2
C H 0 - C - CH 2
3
CH. CH, CHCh> CO CH
O- C - CH O C H p - C - CH
CH, OH HC 3
H
3
3
CH -OH 2
c
I ?i NH ft N HN-CH-C-H-C-C-H-CH I 0=C 2 N 2
1
H
C
0
11
c 1 NH CH y
H^y-CH
H
3
3
1 / 0 = S ^ N ^ ^ O H H " C-CH ' \ °^-N o CH H o C = 0 CH i n 11 1 * 11 ,C-C-N-C-C-N-C-CH •NH O" I H H H 2
3
2
H C-C-NH 2
2
O Figure 1. Representative myxxjtodns: a. a f l a t o x i n B b. ochratoxin A , c . g r i s e o f u l v i n , d . penitrem A , e. deoxynivalenol, f . diacetoxy-scirpenol, g . T-2 t o x i n , h . a-amanitin. lt
In Molecular Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance; Mullin, C., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.
266
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE
Downloaded by PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on August 2, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 22, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0505.ch021
Table I .
Representative Mycotoxins and T h e i r E f f e c t s
Aspergillus aflatoxins sterigmatocystin ochratoxin A
hepatotoxic, carcinogenic carcinogenic nephrotoxic, carcinogenic
Penicillium citrinin griseofulvin patulin rubratoxins penitrems p e n i c i l l i c acid
hepatotoxic carcinogenic, teratogenic t o x i c , carcinogenic hepatotoxic tremorgenic carcinogenic
Fusarium T-2 t o x i n deoxynivalenol diacetoxyscirpenol zearalenone
dermal n e c r o s i s , hemorrhagic emetic, nephrotoxic dermal n e c r o s i s , hemorrhagic estrogenic
Myootoxin Effects on Insects For the most p a r t , c a r c i n o g e n i c i t y i s not o f concern i n i n s e c t studies due t o the r a r i t y o f i n s e c t cancers. Thus, the reported e f f e c t s o f mycotoxins on i n s e c t s include acute t o x i c i t y , reduction i n growth r a t e s , morphological, h i s t o l o g i c a l and reproductive changes. The two most e x t e n s i v e l y studied groups o f mycotoxins are the a f l a t o x i n s and the trichothecenes. These cxxipounds presumably a c t on i n s e c t s i n a manner s i m i l a r t o the way they a c t on mammals, by b i n d i n g w i t h DNA (aflatoxins) o r by i n h i b i t i n g p r o t e i n synthesis (both). Insects fed these ocnpounds may d i e , have reduced growth r a t e s , o r reduced fecundity. Af l a t o x i n i s reported t o induce recessive l e t h a l mutants i n Drosophila melanogaster (6). The tremorgenic mycotoxins i n t e r a c t w i t h the i n s e c t nervous system presumably as they do i n vertebrates, by a f f e c t i n g 7-aminob u t y r i c a c i d (GABA), glutamic, o r other tramsmitters/receptor systems (5). Those t h a t a f f e c t nitrogen r e g u l a t i o n and manifest t h e i r e f f e c t s on the mammalian kidney can a l s o a f f e c t the corresponding structures i n i n s e c t s , the Malpighian tubules (7). I n f a c t , v i r t u a l l y a l l mycotoxins have some e f f e c t on i n s e c t s a t n a t u r a l l y occurring concentrations ( t y p i c a l l y 25 ppm) (5). Thus, i t i s easy t o understand why mycotoxins are considered as defenses against i n s e c t s , as w e l l as mammals. The i m p l i c a t i o n s o f t h i s concept are t h a t a l l o f the r e a c t i o n s and i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s known f o r i n s e c t s and p l a n t secondary metabolites can a l s o be a p p l i e d t o i n s e c t s and mycotoxins.
In Molecular Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance; Mullin, C., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.
21. DOWD
Detoxification of Mycotoxins by Insects
267
Downloaded by PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on August 2, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 22, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0505.ch021
Insect "Resistance" to Myootoodns Insect resistance t o myrataxins m y have evolved through continuous exposure and/or targeted feeding. Resistance t o p l a n t secondary metabolites and s y n t h e t i c i n s e c t i c i d e s i s sometimes thought t o r e s u l t from predisposed adaptations t o (for example) p l a n t secondary metabolites t h a t have p a r t i c u l a r f u n c t i o n a l groups i n common. The same s i t u a t i o n i s relevant f o r z o o t o x i n s . For example, d e t o x i f y i n g enzyme systems t h a t evolved i n i n s e c t s t o d e a l k y l a t e p l a n t a l l e l o c h e m i c a l s may be capable o f d e a l k y l a t i n g mycotoxins. P o s s i b l y , i n s e c t resistance t o mycotoxins i s a n c e s t r a l t o r e s i s t a n c e t o p l a n t a l l e l o c h e m i c a l s . Based on speculated times o f o r i g i n , i n s e c t s (8) and fungi (9) have been i n t e r a c t i n g f o r nearly 400 m i l l i o n years. This i s approximately 275 m i l l i o n years longer than the p e r i o d t h a t i n s e c t s have been i n t e r a c t i n g w i t h flowering p l a n t s (based on a time o f o r i g i n 125 m i l l i o n years ago - 10). P a r a l l e l evolutionary development o f r e s i s t a n c e t o mycotoxins and p l a n t a l l e l o c h e m i c a l s by i n s e c t s i s a l s o a p o s s i b i l i t y . I n t e r e s t i n g l y , one o f the "oldest" i n s e c t groups, the cockroaches, i s a l s o one o f the most r e s i s t a n t t o af l a t o x i n s (11). The af l a t o x i n s themselves may represent the present day b i o s y n t h e t i c endpoint f o r a progression o f precursors t h a t show a decreasing t o x i c i t y t o i n s e c t s the further they are removed from af l a t o x i n s (12). Insects w i t h s i m i l a r host ranges have d i f f e r e n t s e n s i t i v i t i e s t o mycotoxins even though they would not be expected t o have adapted t o mycotoxins due t o targeted feeding. One example i s Spodoptera frugiperda and Heliooverpa zea, both o f which may feed on corn or other p l a n t s o c c a s i o n a l l y contaminated w i t h mycotoxins. Based on s u b l e t h a l e f f e c t s a t 0.25 ppm (13), H. zea i s about 10-fold more s e n s i t i v e t o a f l a t o x i n B than S. frugiperda. I n contrast, S. frugiperda i s more s e n s i t i v e than H. zea t o the tremorgen roseotoxin B a t 25 ppn i n d i e t s (100% v s . 38% m o r t a l i t y , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . The converse i s t r u e f o r the tremorgen penitrem A (20% v s . 80% reduction i n growth r a t e s , r e s p e c t i v e l y , a t 0.25 ppm i n d i e t s ) (14). G r i s e o f u l v i n , a myootoxin t h a t i s a l s o used p h a r m a c e u t i c a l ^ t o t r e a t fungal s k i n i n f e c t i o n s , i s more t o x i c t o H. zea than S. frugiperda (Dowd, P . F . , unpublished data see following d i s c u s s i o n ) . On the other hand, most trichothecenes are o f s i m i l a r t o x i c i t y t o both i n s e c t s (5,15-17). There i s a l s o v a r i a b i l i t y i n s u s c e p t i b i l i t y o f d i f f e r e n t s t r a i n s o f Drosophila melancgaster t o a f l a t o x i n B ^ A t 400 ppb, a l l o f the Crimea s t r a i n d i e d , 24% o f the Swedish-C s t r a i n reached adulthood and approximately 70% o f the Hikone-R, Lausanne-S, and Oregon-R s t r a i n s reached adulthood (18). These differences i n s u s c e p t i b i l i t y suggest t h a t some s o r t o f r e s i s t a n c e mechanism(s) are present. There are other examples where continuous exposure, has apparently produced resistance t o mycotoxins i n i n s e c t s . Stored product beetles appear r e l a t i v e l y r e s i s t a n t t o ochratoxin A and TV-2 t o x i n (19) compared t o stored product c a t e r p i l l a r s (20). P o s s i b l y the beetles are l e s s mobile than the moths and have experienced greater s e l e c t i o n pressure when stored m a t e r i a l s have become contaminated w i t h myootoxin-prxxJucirig fungi. 1
In Molecular Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance; Mullin, C., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.
Downloaded by PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on August 2, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: September 22, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0505.ch021
268
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE
There are a l s o cases where targeted feeding on inycotoxiri-