Subscriber access provided by BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV
Article
Development of a QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of Carcinogenic 2-Nitrofluorene and 1-Nitropyrene in Rice Grains and Vegetables: A Comparative Study with Benzo[a]pyrene Kailin Deng, and Wan Chan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00051 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 22, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Development of a QuEChERS-Based Method for the Determination of Carcinogenic 2-Nitrofluorene and 1-Nitropyrene in Rice Grains and Vegetables: A Comparative Study with Benzo[a]pyrene
Kailin Deng† and Wan Chan *,†,‡
†
Environmental Science Programs and ‡ Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong
University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
* Corresponding author (Tel: +852 2358-7370; Fax: +852-2358-1594; E-mail:
[email protected])
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 39
1
ABSTRACT
2
Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) are ubiquitous
3
environmental pollutants attracting increasing attention because of their potent
4
mutagenicity to humans. Previous studies of nitro-PAHs focused on investigating
5
their formation mechanisms and detecting them in atmospheric environment, however,
6
few studies reported their occurrence in food samples and regulations on nitro-PAHs
7
are still lacking. We report in this study the development and application of a Quick,
8
Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method for the determination
9
of nitro-PAHs in rice and vegetable samples. The analysis of the collected samples by
10
the validated method revealed 1-nitropyrene and 2-nitrofluorene were widespread
11
food contaminants. A comparative study with benzo[a]pyrene, the commonly used
12
marker for PAH exposure, showed that carcinogenic nitro-PAHs existed in rice and
13
vegetables at similar concentrations. Dietary exposure risk, which was estimated
14
based on the surveillance data, suggested 3.28-5.03 ng/kg/day of nitro-PAHs exposure
15
for Hong Kong citizens from rice grains and vegetables.
16 17
Keywords: QuEChERS; Nitro-PAHs; Rice; Vegetables; HPLC-FLD; Dietary exposure
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
18
INTRODUCTION
19
Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) are ubiquitous
20
environmental pollutants formed by multiple pathways,1 for example, during
21
incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, nitro-PAHs are produced and emitted in the
22
exhaust,2,3 while emerging evidence also suggested that polycyclic aromatic
23
hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the atmosphere could react with N2O5, NO2, and NO3
24
radicals to generate nitro-PAHs.4-6 Although present in smaller quantities than PAHs
25
in the ambient environment, nitro-PAHs are still of concerns to human health due to
26
their potent mutagenic and carcinogenic properties.7,8 For example, 1-nitropyrene, 1
27
(Figure 1), a highly specific marker molecule for diesel exhaust, is classified by the
28
International Agency for Research on Cancer as a probable cancer causing agent to
29
humans.9
30
Unlike PAHs which can only form mutagenic DNA adducts after hepatic oxidative
31
activation,10 toxicology studies indicated that nitro-PAHs (e.g. 1-nitropyrene) can
32
form covalently-bonded adducts with DNA through dual pathways;11 Reaction with
33
2'-deoxyguanosine in DNA can occur through reactive intermediates generated from a
34
ring oxidation or a nitro-reduction process.12 Having two pathways to produce
35
covalently-bonded DNA adducts render nitro-PAHs more potent carcinogens than
36
PAHs.
37
Food ingestion has been proven to be the predominant pathway for PAHs exposure
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 39
38
to non-smokers.13-15 However, previous studies of nitro-PAHs focused on atmospheric
39
samples (gas-phase and particulate matter).4,16,17 Few studies reported on the
40
quantitative determination of nitro-PAHs in food products, presumably due to their
41
low concentrations and the complexity of the matrix.18,19 Thus, simple and effective
42
methods capable of analyzing nitro-PAHs in food samples are urgently needed to
43
obtain monitoring data.
44
We recently developed a high-performance liquid chromatography method with
45
fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) for the analysis of nitro-PAHs in meat
46
products.20 The method utilizes Fe/H+-induced nitro-reduction to convert
47
non-fluorescing nitro-PAHs to strongly fluorescing amino-PAHs for their sensitive
48
detection using FLD. In this work, we modified and extended the application of the
49
method to investigate the concentration of 1 and 2-nitrofluorene, 2, the model
50
substances of carcinogenic nitro-PAHs,21,22 in jasmine rice and vegetables collected
51
from supermarkets in Hong Kong and mainland China. Specifically, a Quick, Easy,
52
Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) based method was developed and
53
used in this study to quantitate nitro-PAHs in food products. Compared to
54
conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometric-based methods that are
55
time-demanding, labor-intensive, and solvent-consuming,23,24 the QuEChERS-based
56
sample preparation takes only several minutes and uses merely 10 mL of acetonitrile
57
for each sample,25 yet both methods have similar analytical sensitivities.18 With the
58
goal of better understanding the relative concentration and dietary exposure risk of 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
59
PAHs and nitro-PAHs in food products, a comparative analysis of benzo[a]pyrene, 3,
60
the molecular indicator of carcinogenic PAH,26, 27 was also performed.
61 62 63
MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Reagents. All chemicals and reagents used were of the highest
64
purity available and were used without further purification. Iron powder, glacial acetic
65
acid, 2-nitrofluorene, 1-nitropyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene were purchased from Sigma
66
(St. Louis, MO). Primary and secondary amine (PSA) sorbent was obtained from
67
Agela Technologies (Tianjin, China). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was acquired from
68
Tedia (Fairfield, OH). Deionized water was further purified by a Milli-Q Ultrapure
69
water purification system (Billerica, MA) and used in the entire study.
70
Sample Collection. Food samples (vegetables n=18; rice, n=14) were obtained
71
randomly from supermarkets in Hong Kong and Shenzhen (Guangdong, China). The
72
samples were sealed in polypropylene bags immediately upon sampling. Vegetables
73
and rice grains were kept at 0 oC and transported to the laboratory where they were
74
stored in -20 oC freezer before being processed. Prior to analysis, the samples were
75
washed with purified water (for vegetable samples), blot dried, homogenized in their
76
raw state, and prepared by a QuEChERS-based method as described below.
77 78
Sample Preparation. QuEChERS sample extraction. A dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) based QuEChERS sample preparation method was developed and 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
79
used in this study. In brief, 10 g of homogenized vegetable/rice samples were
80
accurately weighed in a 50 mL Falcon tube. Acetonitrile (10 mL) was then added to
81
the samples and the sample solution was ultrasonicated at room temperature for 30
82
min. Sodium chloride (1 g) and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (4 g) were then added
83
to the samples and mixed by vortex.
84
Page 6 of 39
d-SPE Clean-up. After centrifugation at 3800 rpm for 5 min, 1 mL of the
85
supernatant was extracted and put into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing PSA
86
sorbent (30 mg) and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (150 mg). The samples after
87
vortex mixing for 1 min were centrifuged at 13800 rpm for 10 min to settle the PSA.
88
The supernatant was then transferred into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and dried
89
under N2 stream for Fe/H+ treatment.
90
Fe/H+ Treatment. The sample extracts after QuEChERS extraction and d-SPE
91
clean-up were treated with Fe/H+ to reduce the non-fluorescing nitro-PAHs to their
92
corresponding amino-PAHs (Figure 2). Nitro-reduction of nitro-PAHs to amino-PAHs
93
was performed essentially as described previously,20 with modification. In brief, the
94
concentrated sample extracts were re-dissolved in 200 µL of 15% acetic acid in
95
methanol (v/v) and iron powder (10 mg) was then added. The sample mixtures were
96
vortexed for 20 min to reduce 1 and 2 to 1-aminopyrene, 4, and 2-aminofluorene, 5,
97
respectively (Figure 2). The Fe/H+-treated samples were centrifuged at 13,800 rpm for
98
10 min before the supernatant was transferred to an HPLC vial for HPLC-FLD
99
analysis. 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
100
HPLC-FLD Analysis. HPLC-FLD analysis was performed on an Agilent 1260
101
Infinity LC system (Palo Alto, CA). Ten microliter of the Fe/H+-treated sample extract
102
was injected on a 150 mm x 2.0 mm i.d., 5 µm, GraceSmart RP-18 column (Grace,
103
Deerfield, IL) thermostated at 40 °C for chromatographic separation. The column was
104
eluted with a binary solvent system, with solvent A being water, solvent B being
105
acetonitrile. Gradient elution at constant flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was adopted, with
106
the solvent gradient as follows: 30% B programmed linearly to 100% B in 12 min and
107
held for another 5 min before re-conditioning. The HPLC was coupled to an Agilent
108
1100 programmable FLD (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) with the FLD
109
time-programmed at excitation/emission wavelengths (λex/ λem) as follows: 0-7.5 min:
110
λex 280 and λem 370nm; 7.5-10min: λex 240 and λem 435 nm; 10-15 min: λex 260 and
111
λem 410 nm.
112
Calibration and Method Validation. A stock solution mixture of 1-3 each at 1000
113
mg/L was prepared in acetonitrile and stored at -20 °C until used. Working standard
114
solution mixtures of individual analytes at 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/mL
115
were prepared by serial dilution of the stock solution with methanol. Working
116
standard solution (100 µL) was dried under N2 gas stream, to which 200µL of 15%
117
acetic acid in methanol (v/v) and 10 mg of iron powder were added. The standard
118
solution mixtures were vortexed at room temperature for 20 min before being
119
analyzed using the HPLC-FLD method described above. While calibration curves for
120
nitro-PAHs (1 and 2) were established by plotting the peak areas of their 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
121
corresponding amino-PAH derivative against the concentrations of nitro-PAH in the
122
calibration standard solutions, that for 3 was established by plotting their
123
corresponding peak areas against its concentration in the working standard solutions.
124
Page 8 of 39
The developed method was evaluated for sensitivity, precision, and recovery. The
125
limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were established as the
126
amount of the analyte that generated a signal 3 and 10 times that of the noise level at
127
0.005µg/mL, respectively.28 The method precision was evaluated by analyzing rice,
128
radish, and lettuce spiked with standard mixture at two different concentrations (0.5
129
and 5.0 µg/kg), on the same day (n = 5) and over separate days in a month (n = 5).
130
The method recovery was evaluated by spiking the nitro-PAHs and PAHs to samples
131
(0.5 and 5.0 µg/kg), extracted by QuEChERS clean-up method, processed with Fe/H+,
132
and analyzed by HPLC-FLD as described above. It is worth noting that the real
133
samples may have lower extractability than spiked samples, so that after spiking the
134
analytes, samples were mixed for 1 h before being processed to mimic the situation.
135
Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment. Dietary exposure level (ED) was calculated
136
based on standard Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) methodologies,27,29,30
137
by:
=
C × IR (Eqn.1)
138
where Ci is the concentration of individual NPAH/PAH in food i (µg/kg);
139
IR represents ingestion amount of food i per day (kg/day), BW represents body weight 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
140
in kg. Food consumption and body weight data were obtained from the Hong Kong
141
food consumption survey (2005-2007) based on 24-h food recalls.31 In this survey, the
142
database covered adult and senior population (20-84 years old; n=5394,000), mean
143
value of body weight was 61.25 kg for Hong Kong citizens. Regarding the monitoring
144
data in this study, two different scenarios (lower [LB] and upper bound [UB]) related
145
to the treatment of the non-detects (NDs) and values below the limit of quantitation
146
(