Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular

Jan 15, 2019 - The APEs are reduced further to 2.30, 2.69, 2.25, and 2.48% for the four .... EncoderMap: Dimensionality Reduction and Generation of Mo...
0 downloads 0 Views 904KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Winnipeg Library

Molecular Mechanics

Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization to Reproduce Ab Initio Anisotropy Junmei Wang, Piotr Cieplak, Ray Luo, and Yong Duan J. Chem. Theory Comput., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00603 • Publication Date (Web): 15 Jan 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 15, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization to Reproduce Ab Initio Anisotropy

Junmei Wang,† Piotr Cieplak,‡ Ray Luo,⊥ and Yong Duan§ †Department

of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St Pittsburgh,

PA 15261, United States ‡ SBP

Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037,

United States ⊥Departments

of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,

Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States §UC

Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California,

Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States

Corresponding authors: Junmei Wang, 412-383-3268, [email protected] Yong Duan, 530-754-7632, [email protected]

-1-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ABSTRACT A set of atomic polarizability parameters for a new polarizable Gaussian model (pGM) has been developed with the goal to accurately reproduce the polarizability anisotropy, taking advantage of its ability to attenuate all short-range electrostatic interactions, by fitting the ab initio molecular polarizability tensors (Apq) calculated at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level. For comparison, we also rederived the parameters for three Thole models in which the 1-2 (bonded), 1-3 (separated by two bonds) and 1-4 (separated by three bonds) interactions are fully included. The average percent errors (APEs) of molecular polarizability tensors for 4842 molecules or dimers are 2.98, 3.76, 3.28, and 3.82% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba models, respectively, with atom-type independent, universal screening factors (USF). The APEs are reduced further to 2.30, 2.69, 2.25, and 2.48% for the four corresponding polarizable models with atom-type dependent, variable screening factors (VSF). It is encouraging that the pGM with variable screening factors achieved APEs of 1.83 for 1155 amino acid analogs, dipeptides and tetrapeptides, 1.39 for 28 nucleic acid bases, 0.708 for 1464 water clusters, and 1.99 for 85 dimers of water and biological building blocks. Compared to the new set of models, the APEs of the old Thole models that were fitted to isotropic molecular polarizabilities are 8.7% for the Set A (without the 1-2 and 1-3 interactions) and 6.3% for the Set D (with the 1-2 and 1-3 interactions) models, respectively. MPAD, a metric of molecular polarization anisotropy difference based on the diagonal terms of molecular polarizability tensors was defined and applied to assess the polarizable models in reproducing the ab initio molecular polarization anisotropy. The MPADs are 3.71, 4.70, 4.11, and 4.77% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba USF models, respectively. The APEs are reduced further to 2.85, 3.58, 2.90, and 3.15% for the four corresponding VSF models. Thus, the new pGM and Thole models notably improve molecular polarization anisotropy. Since pGM attenuates all short-range electrostatic interactions, its application is expected to improve stability in charge fitting, energy and force calculations and the accuracy of multibody polarization.

-2-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 30

Page 3 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

List of Abbreviations Used in the text: A:

Molecular polarizability tensor

AA:

Set A Applequist model

AE:

Set A Thole exponential model

AL:

Set A Thole linear model

APE:

Average percent error

AT:

Set A Thole Amoeba model

AUE:

Average unsigned error

DA:

Set D Applequist model

DE:

Set D Thole exponential model

DL:

Set D Thole linear model

DT:

Set D Thole Amoeba model

ESP:

Electrostatic potential

FF:

Force field

MPAD:

Molecular polarization anisotropy difference

pGM:

Polarizable Gaussian Model

RMSE:

Root-mean-square error

Set A:

Thole polarizable models with 0% 1-2 and 1-3 and 100% 1-4 interactions

Set D:

Thole polarizable models with 100% 1-2, 1-3 and 1-4 interactions

USF:

universal screening factor

VSF:

variable screening factor

-3-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 30

1. INTRODUCTION Force field is an integral and critical component that forms the foundation for molecular modeling. Because of its simplicity and robustness, the effective functional form (Eq. 1) has been extensively used in many biomolecular force fields, which include AMBER FF94,1 FF99,2 FF99SB,3 FF034, FF12SB,5 FF14SB,6 CHARMM,7 OPLS,8-9 and GROMACS,10 and numerous others. 2

𝑉𝐴𝐹𝐹 = ∑ 𝐾𝑟 (𝑟 − 𝑟𝑒𝑞 ) + ∑ 𝐾𝜃 (𝜃 − 𝜃𝑒𝑞 ) 𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠

2

𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑁

+

∑ 𝑑𝑖ℎ𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑠

𝑞𝑖 𝑞𝑗 𝐴𝑖𝑗 𝐵𝑖𝑗 𝑉𝑛 [1 + cos(𝑛𝜙 − 𝛾)] + ∑ ( + 12 − 6 ) 2 𝑅𝑖𝑗 𝑅𝑖𝑗 𝑅𝑖𝑗

(1 )

𝑖