Difference in Fibril Core Stability between Two Tau Four-Repeat

Nov 20, 2013 - Log In Register .... two different tau four-repeat domain constructs, tau4RD and tauK18, using hydrogen–deuterium exchange ... This d...
0 downloads 0 Views 519KB Size
Rapid Report pubs.acs.org/biochemistry

Difference in Fibril Core Stability between Two Tau Four-Repeat Domain Proteins: A Hydrogen−Deuterium Exchange Coupled to Mass Spectrometry Study Gayathri Ramachandran† and Jayant B. Udgaonkar* National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560 065, India S Supporting Information *

fibrils similar to the paired helical filaments, seen prominently in the case of tau4RD.6,8 The final structures of the fibrils formed by the two constructs also cannot be distinguished by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.6,7 In this context, the primary purpose of this study was to determine if the mechanistic differences in tau 4R domain aggregation would manifest themselves in differences in the high-resolution structures of the fibrils as measured using hydrogen−deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry (HDX−MS). Tau4RD and tauK18 were expressed and purified as described previously.6,7 Fibrillization reactions for the mapping of the fibril core by HDX−MS were set up at a protein concentration of 100 μM. Aggregation conditions for both constructs were identical: 25 mM Tris buffer (pH 7), 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 37.5 μM inducer heparin. Deuterium labeling was conducted for 15 min at 37 °C in 25 mM Tris buffer (pD 7) and 50 mM NaCl, made in D2O. Labeled fibril samples were disaggregated and quenched using 2 M guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) and 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 2.5) and desalted using ice-cold water (pH 2.5); the samples were then injected into the HDX module of the Synapt G2 HD mass spectrometer (Waters). Fibril cores were mapped with the aid of peptide maps that were generated by pepsin digestion. Monomeric samples of both tau4RD and tauK18 were processed like the fibril samples to control for back and forward exchange during HDX−MS. This allowed for the determination of the extent of deuterium incorporation for each of the peptides (see the Supporting Information for details). Peptide maps were generated for both tau four-repeat domain constructs by controlled proteolysis using pepsin at low pH. The peptides used in this study are shown in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information. For tau4RD, the map consists of 17 overlapping peptides that cover ∼95% of the protein sequence, while for tauK18, it consists of 16 overlapping peptides that cover ∼97% of the protein sequence. The peptides generated for both constructs are the same, except at the C-terminus where the presence of 14 additional residues in tau4RD compared to tauK18 results in two different peptides (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). More importantly, the level of coverage obtained was sufficient to map the core of the two fibrils (see below).

ABSTRACT: One of the signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and tauopathies is fibrillization of the microtubule-associated protein tau. The purpose of this study was to compare the high-resolution structure of fibrils formed by two different tau four-repeat domain constructs, tau4RD and tauK18, using hydrogen−deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry as a tool. While the two fibrils are found to be constructed on similar structural principles, the tauK18 fibril has a slightly more stable core. This difference in fibril core stability appears to be reflective of the mechanistic differences in the aggregation pathways of the two proteins.

T

he aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau into amyloid fibrils is associated with both Alzheimer’s disease and the neurodegenerative tauopathies. The protein tau has at the C-terminus three or four repeats (3R or 4R, respectively) that constitute the core of the microtubule-binding domain. Mechanistic and structural studies that seek to understand the fibrillization process in vitro in the hope that this knowledge will aid drug discovery use either the full-length tau isoforms, composed of both N- and C-terminal domains, or truncated tau 3R or 4R domain constructs to study the aggregation process.1 The basic mechanism of tau aggregation in the presence of inducers has been described by several studies as ligand-induced nucleation-dependent polymerization (NDP).2,3 Several high-resolution structural studies have also determined that of the four repeat sequences, the core of tau fibrils is built by the second and third repeats (R2 and R3, respectively)4,5 (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). Previous work from our laboratory examined the aggregation mechanism of two different tau 4R domain constructs, tau4RD and tauK18, in the presence of the ligand/inducer heparin.6,7 Tau4RD has 14 additional residues at the C-terminus compared to tauK18 (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). While the basic aggregation mechanism of both constructs could be described as ligand-induced NDP, there were important differences in terms of the nature of parallel pathways that were also available for aggregation. For tau4RD aggregation, the parallel pathway is unproductive for fibril formation but leads instead to the formation of protofibrils and nonfibrillar aggregates,6 while for tauK18 aggregation, the parallel pathway is productive and allowed by fibril fragmentation on the main pathway for fibril growth.7 The final mature fibrils formed by both constructs are predominantly thin fibrils,6,7 with a few thick © 2013 American Chemical Society

Received: October 23, 2013 Revised: November 18, 2013 Published: November 20, 2013 8787

dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi4014352 | Biochemistry 2013, 52, 8787−8789

Biochemistry

Rapid Report

Figure 1 shows mass spectra of four select peptide fragments that are representative of the four repeat regions of tau, obtained

Figure 2. Extent of incorporation of deuterium into different sequence segments of (a) tau4RD fibrils and (b) tauK18 fibrils following HDX for 15 min. The percent deuterium incorporation for each peptide fragment was calculated as described above. The error bars represent the standard deviations calculated from two independent experiments. The dashed lines are used to define protection thresholds: strongly protected (75% D).

Figure 1. Mass spectra of selected peptides that span the four repeat sequences of tau obtained following HDX from tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils for 15 min. The mass spectra of the appropriate controls, namely, protonated (0% D) and deuterated (90% D) peptides derived from tau4RD, are also shown (the data for 0 and 90% D peptides are not significantly different for tau4RD and tauK18). The dashed lines represent the centroid average m/z for a particular peptide.

S316−C322 (Figure 2 and Figure S2 of the Supporting Information). This structure is very similar to the structure proposed for one of two populations of coexisting tauK19 (3R domain construct) fibrils from a recent solid-state NMR study, in which the secondary chemical shift data indicated the presence of two β-strands that extended over V306−L315 (with a kink at P312) and a third β-strand that extended over K317−C322 (with kinks at S316 and G323).4 Indeed, an EPR study of 2N4R tau fibrils also identified L315 as the site of a possible turn conformation.5 Additionally, the HDX−NMR data for tauK18 and tauK19 fibrils also concur with respect to the remarkable similarity in the organization of repeat R3 in the two different fibrils.4 The protection against HDX for repeat R2 (unique to the four-repeat constructs) in the tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils examined in this study indicates the existence of a distinct region of moderate protection (Figure 2 and Figure S2 of the Supporting Information). In contrast, repeats R1 and R4 are completely solvent-exposed except for a short stretch in repeat R1 (K267−K274) that is possibly structured (Figure 2 and Figure S2 of the Supporting Information). A careful examination of the strongly protected core (V306− L315) in repeat R3 of both tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils reveals an interesting detail (Figure 2). Both tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils display a gradation in the protection pattern of the 306VQIVYK311 hexapeptide motif. The HDX−MS data of peptides that correspond to sequence segments 306−315, 308−315, and 310−315 indicate that residues I308 and V309 are less protected than the two flanking residues on either side, in both tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils (Figure 2). Quite surprisingly, an opposite graded pattern of protection can be seen in the HDX−NMR data of tauK18 fibrils, though this pattern is not mentioned in that study; in that data set, residues I308 and V309 are more protected than the two flanking residues on either side.4 More crucially perhaps for the purpose of this study, there appears to be a subtle difference in the stabilities of the fibril cores of tau4RD and tauK18, as measured by a difference in the magnitude of deuterium incorporation (Figure 2). The sequence segment 310−315 belonging to repeat R3, for example, shows 17% D incorporation (Figure 2a) in tau4RD fibrils versus 7% D in tauK18 fibrils (Figure 2b). This difference in stability exists in repeat R2, as well: the sequence segment 285−307 shows 66% D

following deuterium labeling of both tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils for 15 min. As one may see, the mass spectra show unimodal isotopic m/z envelopes consistent with each peptide fragment existing in one predominant conformation. Further, different peptide fragments exhibit different extents of deuterium incorporation as measured by the position of the centroid average m/z of the fibrils relative to that of the protonated (0% D) and fully deuterated (90% D) controls (see the dashed lines in Figure 1). These differences arise from the differences in the structural content of the sequence segments that correspond to the peptide fragments: segments that are in structured β-sheets will show little deuterium incorporation upon HDX, while those that are found in disordered turns or loops will easily exchange their amide hydrogen for deuterium and will hence exhibit substantial deuterium incorporation.9 For tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils, the sequence segment 265−284 that largely corresponds to repeat R2 and the sequence segment 310−315 that corresponds to repeat R3 are protected from HDX, indicative of their participation in the fibril core (Figure 1). In contrast, sequence segments 243−253 and 345−356, corresponding to repeats R1 and R4, respectively, are accessible to HDX, indicative of the solvent exposure of these fibrillar regions (Figure 1). This pattern of protection against HDX for the whole of tau4RD and tauK18 fibrils is shown in Figure 2. At first glance, the core regions of the two fibrils appear to be largely similar. The region that shows the strongest protection (