Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
The diffusion performance of fertilizer nutrient through polymer latex film Di An, Ling Yang, Boyang Liu, Ting-Jie Wang, and Chengyou Kan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04225 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Nov 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 27, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
The diffusion performance of fertilizer nutrient through polymer
2
latex film
3 4
Di An, Ling Yang, Boyang Liu, Ting-Jie Wang* and Chengyou Kan
5
Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
6
*Corresponding author: Phone: +86-10-62788993. Fax: +86-10-62772051. Email:
7
[email protected] 8 9
Abstract: Matching the nutrient release rate of coated fertilizer with the nutrient uptake rate of the
10
crop is the best way to increase the utilization efficiency of nutrient and reduce environmental
11
pollution from the fertilizer. The diffusion property and mechanism of nutrients through the film is
12
the theoretical basis for the product pattern design of coated fertilizer. For the coated fertilizer with
13
single-component nutrient, an extended solution-diffusion model was used to describe the
14
difference of nutrient release rate, and the release rate is proportional to the permeation coefficient
15
and the solubility of nutrient. For the double and triple component fertilizer of N-K, N-P and
16
N-P-K, because of the interaction among nutrient molecules and ions, the release rates of different
17
nutrients was significantly affected by the component in the composite fertilizer. Coating the
18
single-component fertilizer, i.e., nitrogen fertilizer, phosphate fertilizer and potash fertilizer firstly,
19
and subsequently bulk blending is expected to be the promising way for flexible adjusting the
20
nutrient release rate to meet the nutrient uptake rate of the crop.
21
Key words: Coated fertilizer, Polymer latex, Nutrient, Controlled release, Diffusion
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
1. Introduction
24
Fertilizing control-release fertilizer with film coated is a promising way to increase the
25
utilization efficiency of nutrient and reduce environmental pollution from the fertilizer1, 2. The
26
nutrient release process of film coated fertilizer consists of three stages3, 4: (1) Water vapors
27
permeate through the film into interior of the coated fertilizer, and dissolve part of the fertilizer to
28
form a saturated nutrient solution in the interior. The vapor pressure gradient across the film is the
29
driving force in this stage. (2) The nutrient starts to release by the driving force of the
30
concentration gradient across the film. While the water constantly diffuses into the film to dissolve
31
the fertilizer core at the same time, and the concentration of the internal solution remains saturated.
32
(3) After the fertilizer in the core is dissolved completely, the concentration of the solution
33
decreases as the release proceeds, and the release rate decreases accordingly. In the three stages,
34
the second stage is the main stage of nutrient release from the film-coated fertilizer. Ideally,
35
matching the nutrient release rate with the nutrient uptake rate of the crop can decrease the
36
nutrient concentration in the soil, which reduce the loss of nutrient to water, volatilization to air
37
and the mineralization in soil, achieving the efficient use of fertilizer3.
38
For the coated fertilizer with the same film coating, the release rate of different nutrient is
39
quite different. Huett et al.5 measured the release performance of coated compound fertilizer
40
formulations of Osmocote (A brand of coated fertilizer produced by The Scotts Company, USA),
41
and reported that the release rate was in the order of N > K > P. Broschat et al.6 measured the
42
release performance of polyolefin coated fertilizer with the nutrient content of being 13% of N, 13%
43
of P2O5 and 13% of K2O. The release rate obtained was in the order of NO3- > NH4+ > K+ > P. Lu
44
et al.7 measured the release property of thermosetting resin coated fertilizer, and the release rate
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 22
Page 3 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
was in the order of K > N > P, the slowest release rate of phosphorus is explained by its slowest
46
dissolution rate. Du et al.8 measured the release performance of polyurethane coated fertilizer with
47
the nutrient content being 19% of N, 6% of P2O5 and 13% of K2O and reported that the release
48
rate was in the order of NO3- > NH4+ >K > P, and the delay time of the phosphorus release is much
49
longer. It was explained that the higher solubility of nitrogen and potassium resulted in their faster
50
release rate, and until most of the nitrogen and potassium release, phosphorus began to dissolve
51
and release. The different solubility of the nutrients is considered to cause the difference in
52
nutrient release rate5-8.
53
Besides the solubility of nutrients, the interaction between nutrients and the film also affects
54
the nutrient release rate. Noppakundilograt et al.9 prepared coated fertilizer with acrylic
55
acid-acrylamide copolymer, and measured the release rate being in the order of NH4+ > P > K+.
56
Although the NH4+ and K+ have almost the same mobility in water and the same positive charge
57
value, the size of K+ is smaller than that of NH4+. So the K+ has a higher surface area charge
58
density to interact with the negatively charged carboxyl of the acrylic acid-acrylamide copolymer,
59
resulting in that the release rate of K+ is lower than that of NH4+.
60
The amount and rate of the crop’s demand for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrients
61
are different, and it is desired for the release of nutrients in the coated fertilizer to match the crop’s
62
demand. Presently, although there are some relevant studies on the release property of different
63
nutrient in coated fertilizer, these studies lacked quantitative, systematic and in-depth analysis.
64
The polymer latex, of which the continuous phase is water, is free from toxic organic solvents, so
65
it is an environmentally benign and promising material for producing film coated fertilizer10. The
66
study of the diffusion property and mechanism of different nutrient through the film, especially the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
polymer latex film, can provide a theoretical basis for the product and production process design
68
of coated fertilizer, which is of great significance to achieve the precise release of the fertilizer.
69
In this work, the planar film was prepared using styrene-butyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate
70
copolymer latex. The diffusion performance of different kinds of nutrient in different fertilizer
71
across the polymer latex film was measured and the diffusion mechanism was analyzed.
72 73
2. Experimental
74
2.1 Materials
75
The chemical regents used include urea, NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4, NH4H2PO4, (NH4)2HPO4, KCl,
76
K2SO4, KNO3 (Beijing Chemical Works, China), ethanol, p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde,
77
ammonium metavanadate, ammonium molybdate (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China),
78
which are all analytical reagent grade. The copolymer latex of styrene-butyl acrylate-methyl
79
methacrylate with 40% solid content was used to prepare the planar polymer film. The latex was
80
synthesized via a semicontinuous emulsion copolymerization in the Department of Chemical
81
Engineering, Tsinghua University. The water used in the experiment was ultrapure water, its
82
resistivity was 18 MΩ·cm.
83 84
2.2 Film preparation
85
A 250 mm×250 mm rectangular area of a glass sheet was surrounded by medical tape with a
86
thickness of 80 µm. 8 g of polymer latex was diluted to 10 g with ultrapure water and then the
87
diluted latex was dropped onto the center of the rectangular area to produce a film by scraping
88
with a glass rod. The glass sheet with latex coating was put in an oven at 120 oC for 1 h to remove
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 22
Page 5 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
the water in the latex and increase polymer cross-linking in the film. The formed film with
90
uniform thickness was then cooled to room temperature and taken down from the glass sheet for
91
subsequent permeability measurement.
92 93
2.3 Preparation of the saturated nutrient solutions
94
In order to measure the diffusion performance of different nutrients in single-component
95
fertilizer through the film, the saturated solutions of urea ((NH2)2CO), NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4,
96
NH4H2PO4, (NH4)2HPO4, KCl, K2SO4 and KNO3 at 25 oC were prepared respectively.
97
In the measurement of the diffusion coefficient of the nutrients in double-component
98
fertilizer through the film, i.e. N-P and N-K composite fertilizer, the saturated solutions of
99
urea-KCl and urea-NH4H2PO4 at 25 oC were prepared respectively according to the composition of
100
the commercial fertilizer products. The saturated solutions for the double and triple components
101
indicates that all of the components exist in both solid and liquid phase. In the preparation process,
102
it is necessary to ensure that each component is saturated in the solution, that is, the quality of
103
each component added exceeds the corresponding solubility when it exists alone in the solution.
104 105 106
The phase rule of multicomponent salt-water solutions under isothermal and isobaric conditions is expressed as11: F = C − Ph
(1)
107
where F is the freedom degree of each component concentration in the system, C is the number of
108
independent components, and Ph is the number of coexisting phase in the system. For urea-KCl
109
saturated system, C=3, and the system contains urea solid phase, KCl solid phase and liquid phase,
110
so Ph=3. From Eq. (1), the freedom degree of the system, F=0. That is to say, the concentration of
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 22
111
each component in the saturated solution is a fixed value and does not change with the amount of
112
solid component added. The urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solution has the similar case, and the
113
freedom degree of the system, F=0.
114
In the measurement of the diffusion performance for the nutrients in triple-component
115
fertilizer, i.e. N-P-K composite fertilizer, the saturated solution of NH4Cl-ammonium
116
phosphate-potassium salt was prepared according to the composite of the commercial fertilizer
117
products. Specifically, four groups of composite saturated solution, i.e., NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-KCl,
118
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-KCl, NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4, NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4 at 25 oC were
119
prepared respectively, and in the preparation process, each excessive solid component comparing
120
to
121
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-KCl, C=4, and the systems contain three solid phases and one liquid phase,
122
i.e., Ph=4, so F=0, the concentration of each component is a fixed value. However, for the
123
saturated solutions of NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4 and NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4, C=5, and Ph=5,
124
so F=0, the concentration of each component is also a fixed value. Considering the most widely
125
used nutrient ratio of N:P2O5:K2O=1:1:1, which is the most representative, its saturated solution
126
was prepared as shown in Table 1.
water
was ensured. For
the saturated solutions of NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-KCl and
127
Table 1. Amount of component in NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4 and NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4
128
systems (N:P2O5:K2O=1:1:1) NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4 (g)
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4 (g)
NH4Cl
NH4H2PO4
K2SO4
water
NH4Cl
(NH4)2HPO4
K2SO4
water
165.6
87.7
100
200
187.5
150
150
200
129 130
2.4 Measurement of film permeability
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
131
The main stage of nutrient release of the film coated fertilizers is the release of saturated
132
nutrient solution from the interior of the film to the external water environment. So in order to
133
simulate the release process, a Ussing chamber12 was used to measure the diffusion performance
134
of nutrient through the polymer latex film, as shown in Figure 1. Both sides of the Ussing chamber
135
have a volume of 100 mL and the connection neck has an inner diameter of 30 mm. The film was
136
cut into a circular shape with a diameter of 40 mm and its thickness was measured. Then the film
137
was fixed in the middle of Ussing chamber, clamped with a clip and sealed with waterproof glue.
138
The saturated nutrient solution was added to the supply side, and the ultrapure water was added to
139
the receiving side. Both sides were kept at the same height at the beginning. The Ussing chamber
140
was sealed on top and placed into an incubator at 25 oC. After a set time, the mass of nutrient
141
diffusing into the receiving side was measured.
142
For single-component fertilizer, the concentration of urea was measured by UV-Vis
143
spectrophotometric method using p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde as chromogenic agent13, the
144
concentration of NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4, KCl, K2SO4, KNO3 was determined by measuring the
145
conductivity of the solution in the receiving side. The concentrations of NH4H2PO4 and
146
(NH4)2HPO4 were measured by ion chromatography14. For double and triple component fertilizer,
147
the concentrations of NH4+, K+ and H2PO4- / HPO42- in the solution of the receiving side were
148
measured by ion chromatography.
149 150
3. Results and discussion
151
3.1 Diffusion property of single-component fertilizer solution
152
The change of different nutrient mass diffused to the receiving side with time is shown in
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
153
Page 8 of 22
Figure 2.
154
Figure 2 shows that the diffusion process of the nutrient through the film has two stages. In
155
the first stage, the nutrient permeates through the film, and the mass of nutrient in the receiving
156
side was almost zero. In the second stage, the diffusion went to the steady, and the mass of nutrient
157
entering into the receiving side increased linearly with time, indicating that the diffusion flux of
158
the nutrient is constant. As the concentration of the nutrient in the receiving side is much lower
159
than that in the supply side, the concentration difference between both sides is regarded as the
160
concentration in the film phase in the supply side, i.e., Cm0, is a constant. Therefore, the nutrient
161
diffusions through the film are consistent with Fick’s law, as shown in Eq. (2).
162
J = D⋅
dCm C = D ⋅ m0 dL L
(2)
163
where J is the diffusion flux, D is the diffusion coefficient of nutrient in the film, dCm/dL is the
164
concentration gradient of nutrient in the film phase, L is the thickness of the film.
165
The nutrient diffusion can be described by the solution-diffusion model15, 16. The permeation
166
of nutrients in the model has three steps: (1) the partition of nutrients into the film phase in the
167
supply side; (2) the diffusion of nutrients through the film; (3) the partition of nutrients into the
168
solution phase in the receiving side. Step (1) and (3) are fast steps, and step (2) is the limiting step.
169
Meantime, in the steady stage of diffusion, the diffusion flux of nutrients in the steady stage can
170
also be expressed as,
171
J = Pe ⋅
Cl 0 C = Pe ⋅ s L L
(3)
172
where Pe is the permeation coefficient of nutrient across the film, Cl0 is the concentration in the
173
solution phase in the supply side, which is the saturated concentration in the solution, Cs. The
174
partition coefficient between the film and solution phase, i.e., K is expressed as follows,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
175
176
181 182
183
K =Pe /D
(5)
where Pe can be calculated according to Eq. (3), and D can be calculated by time-lag method17,
179 180
(4)
From Eq. (2) - Eq. (4), there is,
177 178
Cm 0 Cl 0
K=
D=
L2 6θ
(6)
where θ is the time it takes for nutrient to reach the steady diffusion stage. The parameters of diffusion performance for each nutrient were calculated and reported in Table 2. Table 2. Parameters of diffusion performance for each nutrient through the film Nutrients
L(µm)
θ(h)
D(10-13 m2/s)
Pe(10-17 m2/s)
K(10-3)
urea
50
1.40
0.83
51.9
6.3
KCl
50
0.62
1.86
25.1
1.3
KNO3
52
1.00
1.25
23.2
1.9
K2SO4
70
1.90
1.19
79.9
6.7
NH4Cl
60
1.34
1.24
8.26
0.67
(NH4)2SO4
72.5
2.46
0.99
8.70
0.88
(NH4)2HPO4
55
4.33
0.32
0.25
0.08
NH4H2PO4
60
12.5
0.13
0.22
0.16
184
Table 2 shows the diffusion performance for different nutrient through the film. For nutrients
185
with the same cation K+, the measured D was in the order of KCl > KNO3 > K2SO4. For nutrients
186
with the same cation NH4+, the measured D was in the order of NH4Cl > (NH4)2SO4 >
187
(NH4)2HPO4 > NH4H2PO4. For nutrients with the same anion, the D of potassium salt is higher
188
than that of ammonium salt. This can be explained by extended solution-diffusion model16, 18.
189
Based on free volume model of polymer19, the volume of the polymer consists of two parts: one is
190
the volume of the molecular chain itself, the other is the free volume, that is, the volume among
191
the molecular chains. The extended solution-diffusion model approximates the free volume with
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 22
192
hypothetical cylindrical capillary pores having a mean average pore radius, and the D can be
193
related to the diffusion coefficient of nutrient in infinite water Dw∞ by hindrance factor H(λ),
194
which can be expressed as follows,
D = H (λ ) ⋅ Dw∞
195
(7)
196
where λ is the ratio of the nutrient radius rs to the capillary pore radius r0, that is λ = rs r0 . H(λ)
197
represents the diffusion resistance of nutrients in the polymer film, it is negatively correlated with
198
λ. The Dw∞ of urea was reported to be 1.389×10-9 m2/s20, and the Dw∞ of electrolyte nutrient can
199
be calculated by the limiting molar conductivity in water of its dissociated ions, the formulas were
200
shown as follows21,
201
D ∞j =
202
Dw∞ =
RT λ j
(8)
Z j Fa 2
( Zi + Z j ) Di∞ D ∞j
(9)
Zi Di∞ + Z j D ∞j
203
where D ∞j is the diffusion coefficient of ion in infinite water, λ j is the limiting molar
204
conductivity of ion in water, Z j is the charge value of ion, R is the ideal gas constant, Fa is the
205
Faraday constant, T is the temperature of the solution. The Dw∞ of each nutrient at 25 oC was
206
calculated and reported in Table 3. The radius of each nutrient molecule and ion was reported in
207
Table 4
22-24
. Table 3. Diffusion coefficient of nutrient in infinite water
208
Nutrients
Dw∞ (10-10 m2/s)
Nutrients
Dw∞ (10-10 m2/s)
urea
13.89
NH4Cl
20.05
KCl
19.94
(NH4)2SO4
15.43
KNO3
19.29
(NH4)2HPO4
12.64
K2SO4
15.35
NH4H2PO4
11.85
209
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 4 Radius of each nutrient molecule and ion
210
Nutrients urea +
K
NH4 -
Cl
Nutrients
Radius(Å) 1.80
1.89
2-
2.15
NO3
1.38 +
SO4
1.61
HPO4
1.81
Radius(Å)
-
2-
2.30
-
2.38
H2PO4
211
Based on the parameters of each nutrient reported in Table 3 and Table 4, the regularity of D
212
of different nutrient can be explained. For nutrients with the same cation, as the radius of anion rs
213
increases, the H(λ) of nutrient decreases correspondingly, and the Dw∞ of nutrient also decreases.
214
According to Eq. (7), the D decreases as radius of anion increases. For nutrients with the same
215
anion, the difference of Dw∞ between potassium salt and ammonium salt can be neglected, while
216
the radius of NH4+ is larger than that of K+, so the H(λ) of ammonium salt is lower, and the D of
217
ammonium salt is lower. It is shown that the larger the size of the nutrient molecules and ions are,
218
the lower the diffusion coefficient of them in the film.
219
The results showed that the K of each nutrient is much lower than 1, which means the
220
concentration of nutrient in film phase is much lower than that in solution phase. Among the
221
nutrients, the K of urea and potassium salt are relatively higher, indicating that they have relatively
222
higher solubility in the film. According to Eq. (5), the differences of D and K among different
223
nutrients make the Pe of nutrients vary a lot. The permeation coefficient across the film, Pe, is
224
determined by the partition coefficients between the film phase and the solution phase, and the
225
diffusion coefficient of nutrients in the film.
226 227 228
For the coated fertilizer with single-component nutrient, the release rate, i.e., the mass of nutrient released from coated fertilizer granular per unit time, can be expressed as follows: dm Pe ⋅ ∆C ⋅ S = dt L
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
(10)
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 22
229
where m is the mass of nutrient released, dm/dt is the release rate of coated fertilizer granular. ∆C
230
is the concentration difference between the inside and the outside of the coated film. In the steady
231
stage of nutrient release process, the concentration of nutrient solution inside the coated film is the
232
saturated concentration Cs, which is much higher than that in the external water environment, so
233
∆C=Cs, S is the mass transfer area, for the spherical coated fertilizer granular with a radius of R,
234
S=4πR2, L is the thickness of the coated film. So Eq. (10) can be re-expressed as follows:
dm Pe ⋅ Cs ⋅ 4π R 2 = dt L
235
(11)
236
Eq. (11) shows that the release rate of coated fertilizer is proportional to the Pe of the coated film
237
and the saturated solubility of nutrients. Therefore, the release rate of coated fertilizer with
238
single-component can be easily controlled by the film coating amount, according to the uptake
239
rate of nutrient by crops.
240 241
3.2 Diffusion performance of N-K and N-P double-component fertilizer solution
242
The concentration of each nutrient in urea-KCl and urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solution was
243
measured and reported in Table 5. It indicates that the saturated concentration of each nutrient in
244
the double-component solution is lower than that when the nutrient exists alone in the solution,
245
and the concentration of urea is higher than that of KCl and NH4H2PO4 respectively. Specifically,
246
for urea-KCl saturated solution, the mass of urea dissolved in the solution is 95% of that when
247
urea exists alone, and for KCl, it is only 56%. The ratio of nutrient concentration in saturated
248
solution is measured to be N:K2O=2.64. For urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solution, the mass of urea
249
dissolved in the solution is 87% of that when urea exists alone, and for NH4H2PO4, it is only 53%.
250
The ratio of nutrient concentration in saturated solution is measured to be N:P2O5=2.46. This is
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
251
because urea and water can easily form hydrogen bonds in the solution, which lowers the mobility
252
of water molecules25, 26. Therefore, when the other nutrient is present, the saturated solubility of
253
urea is not significantly reduced. However, due to the decrease in hydration and dissolution of KCl
254
and NH4H2PO4 by water molecules, the saturated solubility of KCl and NH4H2PO4 significantly
255
decreased.
256
Table 5. Saturated concentration of each nutrient in urea-KCl and urea-NH4H2PO4 composite
257
solutions Saturated solution
258
Concentration of nutrient (g/L)
Nutrient ratio
urea-KCl
urea: 601 (95% sat)
KCl: 168 (56% sat)
N:K2O=2.64
urea-NH4H2PO4
urea: 542 (87% sat)
NH4H2PO4: 181 (53% sat)
N:P2O5=2.46
Note: “sat” means the saturated concentration of nutrient in the solution when it exists alone
259
The permeation coefficient Pe of each nutrient in different fertilizer solutions was measured
260
and reported in Table 6. In the urea-KCl saturated solution, the urea molecule interacts with K+
261
and Cl- to form complex molecules27, which has a relatively large size. A small proportion of the
262
urea diffused through the film in the form of complex molecules, which have a higher diffusion
263
resistance and a lower permeation coefficient. A majority of the urea diffuses in the form of urea
264
molecules. So the permeation coefficient of urea in composite solution is lower than that of
265
saturated urea solution. For the KCl solution, all of K+ and Cl- diffuses through the film in the
266
form of complex molecules, so the permeation coefficient of KCl in composite solution is much
267
lower than that of saturated KCl solution. In the urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solution, the urea
268
molecules interact with H2PO4- to form complex molecules28. So the permeation coefficient of
269
urea and NH4H2PO4 in composite solution is lower compared with that when one component
270
exists alone in the saturated solution. As a result, the release rate of N is much faster than K and P
271
due to the interaction between nutrients.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 22
Table 6. Permeation coefficient of each nutrient in different fertilizer solutions
272
Permeation coefficient of nutrient (10-18 m2/s)
Saturated solution urea
urea: 519
-
-
KCl
-
KCl: 251
-
NH4H2PO4
-
-
NH4H2PO4: 2.18
urea-KCl
urea: 323
KCl: 35.7
-
urea-NH4H2PO4
urea: 273
-
NH4H2PO4: 1.27
273
The nutrient release rate ratio was determined by measuring the mass of nutrient in the
274
receiving side and reported in Table 7. Due to the difference in solubility and permeation
275
coefficient of each nutrient, the release rates of different nutrient differ significantly. For the
276
urea-KCl saturated solution, the nutrient release rate ratio is measured to be N:K2O=23.6. For
277
urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solution, the nutrient release rate ratio is measured to be N:P2O5=486.4.
278
This means the release rate of N is much faster than that of K and P. That is to say, for the coated
279
fertilizer with urea-KCl and urea-NH4H2PO4 composition, after most of the urea released, KCl or
280
NH4H2PO4 would begin to release in large quantities.
281
Table 7. Nutrient release rate ratio in urea-KCl and urea-NH4H2PO4 saturated solutions Saturated solution
Nutrient release rate ratio
urea-KCl
N:K2O=23.6
urea-NH4H2PO4
N:P2O5=486.4
282 283
3.3 Diffusion performance of N-P-K multi-component fertilizer solution
284
The concentration of each nutrient in N-P-K saturated solution was measured and reported in
285
Table 8. It indicates that the saturated concentration of each nutrient in the multi-component
286
fertilizer solution is lower than that when the nutrient exists alone in the solution, and due to the
287
difference in affinity of different nutrients to water, the solubility of different nutrients are
288
different.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
289
Table 8. Saturated concentration of each nutrient in N-P-K composite solution Concentration of nutrient (g/L) Saturated solution
290
NH4Cl
NH4H2PO4 / (NH4)2HPO4
KCl / K2SO4
NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-KCl
206 (66% sat)
54 (16% sat)
123 (41% sat)
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-KCl
205 (65% sat)
130 (26% sat)
113 (37% sat)
NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4
260 (83% sat)
60 (18% sat)
98 (85% sat)
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4
243 (78% sat)
128 (26% sat)
88 (76% sat)
Note: “sat” means the saturated concentration of nutrient in the solution when it exists alone
291
The nutrient concentration ratio in N-P-K saturated solution and the release rate ratio of the
292
nutrient through the film were measured and reported in Table 9. It shows that among different
293
solutions, since (NH4)2HPO4 has a higher solubility and N content is higher than NH4H2PO4, the
294
solution taking (NH4)2HPO4 as the source of phosphorus has the relative high contents of N and P
295
compared with that of NH4H2PO4. Because the solubility and permeation coefficient of different
296
nutrients are different, there is a big difference among the release rates of different nutrients. For
297
NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-KCl saturated solution, the release rate was in the order of K2O > N > P2O5. It
298
was analyzed that the highest concentration and smallest size of K+ resulted in the fastest release
299
rate of K+. For NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-KCl saturated solution, the release rate was in the order of N >
300
K2O > P2O5. It was analyzed that (NH4)2HPO4 can provide more NH4+ in the solution, the
301
enhancement in driving force derived from the concentration gradient makes that the release rate
302
of NH4+ is faster than that of K+. In the case of solid nutrient ratio prepared being
303
N:P2O5:K2O=1:1:1, for NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4 saturated solution, the release rate was in the
304
order of K2O > N > P2O5, and for NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4 saturated solution, the release rate
305
was in the order of N > K2O > P2O5. In all solutions, as the concentration of phosphate is the
306
lowest and its size is the biggest, the release rate of P2O5 is the slowest. It shows that the selection
307
of phosphorus source and potassium source has a great influence on the release rate of nutrients.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
308
Page 16 of 22
Table 9. Ratio of nutrient concentration and release rate in N-P-K saturated solution
Saturated solution
Nutrient concentration ratio (N:P2O5:K2O)
Nutrient release rate ratio (N:P2O5:K2O)
NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-KCl
0.78:0.43:1
0.60:0.58:1
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-KCl
1.14:0.98:1
30.9:0.52:1
NH4Cl-NH4H2PO4-K2SO4
1.42:0.70:1
0.23:0.13:1
NH4Cl-(NH4)2HPO4-K2SO4
1.91:1.44:1
11.8:0.12:1
309
The diffusion performance of nutrients in the double and triple component fertilizer solutions
310
indicated that there are significant differences among the release rate of different nutrients. In the
311
double and triple component saturated solution, the freedom degree of the solution is 0, so the
312
release rate of each nutrient is a fixed value, it is not possible to change the release rate by
313
adjusting the nutrient independently. So the difference in the demands for N, P, and K of different
314
crops can not be matched. Therefore, in order to meet the demands of different nutrients for crops,
315
compared with fertilizing coated compound fertilizer, coating the single-component fertilizer, i.e.,
316
nitrogen fertilizer, phosphate fertilizer and potash fertilizer, and blending them according to the
317
corresponding nutrient needs of crops can adjust the nutrient release rate more flexibly.
318 319
Conflict of interest
320
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
321 322 323 324 325 326
References (1) Hanafi, M. M.; Eltaib, S. M.; Ahmad, M. B. Physical and chemical characteristics of controlled release compound fertiliser. Eur. Polym. J. 2000, 36, 2081-2088. (2) Easton, Z. M.; Petrovic, A. M. Fertilizer source effect on ground and surface water quality in drainage from turfgrass. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 645-655.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
327
(3) Shaviv, A. Advances in controlled-release fertilizers. Adv. Agron. 2001, 71, 1-49.
328
(4) Shaviv, A.; Raban, S.; Zaidel, E. Modeling controlled nutrient release from polymer coated
329
fertilizers: diffusion release from single granules. Environ. Sci. Techno. 2003, 37, 2251-2256.
330
(5) Huett, D. O.; Gogel, B. J. Longevities and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium release patterns of
331
polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers at 30 oC and 40 oC. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plan. 2000, 31,
332
959-973.
333
(6) Broschat, T. K.; Moore, K. K. Release rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus,
334
potassium, magnesium, iron, and manganese from seven controlled-release fertilizers. Commun. Soil.
335
Sci. Plan. 2007, 38, 843-850.
336 337 338 339
(7) Lu, P.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Xu, Y. Structure and properties of controlled release fertilizers coated with thermosetting resin. Polym.-plast. Technol. 2013, 52, 381-386. (8) Du, C.; Zhou, J.; Shaviv, A. Release characteristics of nutrients from polymer-coated compound controlled release fertilizers. J. Polym. Environ. 2006, 14, 223-230.
340
(9) Noppakundilograt, S.; Pheatcharat, N.; Kiatkamjornwong, S. Multilayer-coated NPK compound
341
fertilizer hydrogel with controlled nutrient release and water absorbency. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132,
342
41249.
343 344 345 346 347 348
(10) Lan, R.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Wang, T.; Kan, C.; Jin, Y. Experimental modeling of polymer latex spray coating for producing controlled-release urea. Particuology 2011, 9, 510-516. (11) Silcock, H. Solubilities of inorganic and organic compounds: Ternary and multi-component systems of inorganic substances; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1979. (12) Ussing, H. H.; Zerahn, K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1951, 23, 110-127.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
349 350 351 352 353 354
(13) Yang, L.; An, D.; Wang, T.; Kan, C.; Jin, Y. Swelling and diffusion model of a hydrophilic film coating oncontrolled-release urea particles. Particuology 2017, 30, 73-82. (14) Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Nieman, T. A. Principles of instrumental analysis; Saunders College Publishing: Harcourt Brace, Orlando, FL, 1998. (15) Wijmans, J.; Baker, R. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membrane Sci. 1995, 107, 1-21.
355
(16) Wang, J.; Dlamini, D.; Mishra, A.; Pendergast, M.; Wong, M.; Mamba, B.; Freger, V.; Verliefde,
356
A.; Hoek, E. A critical review of transport through osmotic membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2014, 454,
357
516-537.
358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365
(17) Garbarini, G.; Eaton, R.; Kwei, T.; Tobolsky, A. Diffusion and reverse osmosis through polymer membranes. J. Chem. Educ. 1971, 48, 226-230. (18) Deen, W. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 1987, 33, 1409-1425. (19) Sharma, J.; Tewari, K.; Arya, R. K. Diffusion in polymeric systems-A review on free volume theory. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 111, 83-92. (20) Gosting, L. J.; Akeley, D. F. A study of the diffusion of urea in water at 25 oC with the gouy interference method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2058-2060.
366
(21) Robinson, R. A. Stokes R H. Electrolyte solutions; Dover Publications: New York, 1959.
367
(22) Schultz, S. G.; Solomon, A. Determination of the effective hydrodynamic radii of small
368
molecules by viscometry. J. Gen. Physiol. 1961, 44, 1189-1199.
369
(23) Tansel, B.; Sager, J.; Rector, T.; Garland, J.; Strayer, R.; Levine, L.; Roberts, M.; Hummerick, M.;
370
Bauer, J. Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 22
Page 19 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
371
nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51, 40-47.
372
(24) Collins, K. D. Sticky ions in biological systems. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92, 5553-5557.
373
(25) Ramondo, F.; Bencivenni, L.; Caminiti, R.; Pieretti, A.; Gontrani, L. Dimerisation of urea in
374 375 376 377 378
water solution: a quantum mechanical investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2206-2215. (26) Rezus, Y. Bakker, H. Effect of urea on the structural dynamics of water. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, 103, 18417-18420. (27) Hong, J. Capp, M. W.; Anderson, C. F.; Record, M. T. Preferential interactions in aqueous solutions of urea and KCl. Biophys. Chem. 2003, 105, 517-532.
379
(28) Palecz, B.; Grala,; A.; Kudzin, Z. Calorimetric studies of the interactions between several
380
aminophosphonic acids and urea in aqueous solutions at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2014, 59,
381
426-432.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 22
For Table of Contents Only The way of single-component fertilizers’ coating and their bulk blending can match the nutrient uptake rate of the crop.
Mass of KNO3 (mg/m2)
140
(b)
120
Data Linear fit of steady stage, R2=0.999
100 80 60 40 20 0 0
5
10
15
20
Time (h)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
25
30
Page 21 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Ussing chamber 1. Supply side: saturated solution, 2. Film, 3. Receiving side: ultrapure water, 4. Clip 228x134mm (72 x 72 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2. Mass of different nutrient diffused to the receiving side vs time (a) KCl, (b) KNO3, (c) K2SO4, (d) NH4Cl, (e) (NH4)2SO4, (f) (NH4)2HPO4, (g) NH4H2PO4, (h) urea 389x605mm (72 x 72 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 22