Dirhodium Complexes Bridged by Bis(diphenylphosphino)phthalazine

Nov 3, 2010 - Takafumi Yamaguchi, Takashi Koike, and Munetaka Akita*. Chemical Resources Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R1-27, 4259 ...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Organometallics 2010, 29, 6493–6502 DOI: 10.1021/om100832z

6493

Dirhodium Complexes Bridged by Bis(diphenylphosphino)phthalazine (PNNPPh): Central Ring Size and Charge Effects As Compared with the Pyrazolate Derivative (PNNPPy) Takafumi Yamaguchi, Takashi Koike, and Munetaka Akita* Chemical Resources Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R1-27, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan Received August 30, 2010

A dirhodium carbonyl complex with 1,4-bis((diphenylphosphino)methyl)phthalazine (PNNPPh), [( μ-κ2:κ2-PNNPPh){Rh(CO)}2](BF4)2, has been prepared and its reactivity studied as compared with the previously reported 3,5-bis((diphenylphosphino)methyl)pyrazolate (PNNPPy) analogue [( μ-κ2:κ2-PNNPPy){Rh(CO)2}2]BF4. The two quadridentate ligands are different in the size of the central ring and the charge; six-membered ring/neutral (PNNPPh) vs five-membered ring/mononegative (PNNPPy). The reactivities of the two systems turn out to be very similar, as can be seen from formation of the analogous, unique tetranuclear μ4-acetylide ([( μ-PNNPPh)2{Rh(CO)}4(μ4-Ct C-p-tol)]BF4) and μ4-dicarbide complexes ([( μ-PNNPPh)2{Rh(CO)}4(μ4-C2)](BF4)2). However, the PNNPPh system exhibits the following features. (1) The enlargement of the central ring causes shortening of the metal-metal distance, frequently leading to bond formation between them. For more positively charged PNNPPh species, (2) back-donation decreases to facilitate CO dissociation and (3) the rhodium centers become more Lewis acidic. Another feature is that the PNNPPh complex undergoes oxidative addition upon treatment with internal alkynes to form stable adducts with unique coordination structures (e.g., 1,4-dimetallacyclohexa-2,5-diene).

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: makita@ res.titech.ac.jp. (1) Klingele, J.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, F. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2698. Braunstein, P.; Oro, L. A.; Raithby, P. R. Metal Clusters in Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1999 (3 vols.). Dyson, P. J.; McIndoe, J. S. Transition Metal Carbonyl Cluster Chemistry; Gordon and Breach Science: Amsterdam, 2000. Shriver, D. F.; Kaesz, H. D.; Adams, R. D. The Chemistry of Metal Cluster Complexes; VCH: New York, 1990. Abel, E. W.; Stone, F. G. A.; Wilkinson, G. Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1995; Vols. 3-10. Mingos, D. M. P.; Crabtree, R. H. Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III; Elsevier: Oxford, U.K., 2007; Vols. 4-8. (2) (a) Schenk, T. G.; Downs, J. M.; Milne, C. R. C.; Mackenzie, P. B.; Boucher, H.; Whelan, J.; Bosnich, B. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2334. (b) Schenk, T. G.; Milne, C. R. C.; Sawyer, J. F.; Bosnich, B. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2338. See also (c) Bosnich, B. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 2554. (3) (a) Tanaka, S.; Akita, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2865. (b) Tanaka, S.; Dubs, C.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Organometallics 2004, 23, 317. (c) Dubs, C.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2760. (d) Tanaka, S.; Dubs, C.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Organometallics 2005, 24, 163. (e) Dubs, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Organometallics 2006, 25, 1344. (f) Dubs, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Organometallics 2006, 25, 1359. (g) Dubs, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Inagaki, A.; Akita, M. Chem. Commun 2006, 1962.

reactivity study of the dirhodium carbonyl adduct [( μ-κ2:κ2PNNPPy){Rh(CO)2}2]BF4 (C) were reported by Bosnich in 1985,2 and recently, we revealed the unique reactivity of C: in particular, the formation of tetranuclear species (see Scheme 1).3 It has been revealed that the inner CO ligands in C are so labile owing to the influence of the P donors trans to CO as well as steric reasons that the dicarbonyl species D with a cis-divacant site resulting from decarbonylation of C serves as an efficient 4e acceptor.2a,3 As an extension, we have designed the phthalazine analogue PNNPPh, having the six-membered pyridazine skeleton in place of the five-membered pyrazole ring in the PNNPPy ligand (Scheme 1). The enlargement of the ring part should cause shortening of the distance between the metal centers (l1 > l2) and, as a result, the PNNPPh system should have more chances to form a metal-metal bond between the metal centers within the ( μ-PNNPPh)Rh2 unit (intraunit). For the PNNPPy system, no intraunit metal-metal bond formation is observed, although cluster species are formed by interunit metal-metal bond formation (e.g., F). Furthermore, the change of the ring also causes a change in the charge of the ligands. PNNPPy is a mononegative ligand, while PNNPPh is a neutral one. Such a change should influence the chemical reactivity of the resultant metal complexes. For the sake of comparison, typical reactions of the ( μ-PNNPPy)Rh2 system are summarized in Scheme 1. The ligand A-H is readily converted to the dirhodium cod complex B upon treatment with [Rh(cod)2]þ/NEt3.2a Carbonylation of B affords the tetracarbonyl complex C, which serves as an equivalent to the putative 4e acceptor D, upon subsequent in situ decarbonylation.

r 2010 American Chemical Society

Published on Web 11/03/2010

Introduction Polynuclear species are expected to display unique chemical behavior arising from cooperation of the plural metal centers.1 Our attention has been focused on the quadridentate, dinucleating 3,5-bis((diphenylphosphino)methyl)pyrazolate (PNNPPy) ligand system, which would provide a cis-divacant coordination site effective for cooperative activation of substrates (e.g., D in Scheme 1). The synthesis and a preliminary

pubs.acs.org/Organometallics

6494

Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 23, 2010

Yamaguchi et al. Scheme 1

Scheme 2

Treatment of C with lithium acetylide provides the dinuclear μ-η1:η2-acetylide E, which is further converted to the tetranuclear μ4-acetylide F by treatment with C.3b,d The tetranuclear complex F has been directly obtained from terminal alkyne upon treatment with C. Interestingly, the tetranuclear μ4-CtCH complex (F; R = H) is converted to the μ4-dicarbide complex G by deprotonation.3b,d The complexes E-G show fluxional behavior, and it is notable that the mechanisms for the fluxional behavior of F and G involve reversible metal-metal bond cleavage and recombination processes. Reaction of C with internal alkyne forms the unstable μ-η2:η2 adduct H.3d In contrast to the incorporation of acetylide and alkyne (4e donors), the unique μ4-hydride complex I is formed by reaction of C with hydrosilane.3b,d Herein we disclose (1) the synthesis of the PNNPPh ligand and its group 9 metal complexes and (2) reactions of the resultant dirhodium carbonyl species toward alkynes and HSiEt3, furnishing unique adducts.

Results and Discussion Ligand Synthesis. We designed a synthetic route to the PNNPPh ligand 1 following the relevant hexadentate N6

ligand with the phthalazine core developed by Lippard (Scheme 2).4 Ligand 1 was readily prepared by a two-step process: (1) overnight reaction of 1,4-dichlorophthalazine with an excess amount of LiCH2P(dO)Ph2 (generated by treatment of OdPPh3 with MeLi)5 followed by (2) reduction of the resultant phosphine oxide derivative 2 with HSiCl3/NEt3. A shorter reaction time or a smaller amount of the lithium reagent caused formation of the monosubstituted product 3. Ligand 1 could not be obtained by direct substitution reaction of 1,4-dichlorophthalazine with LiCH2PPh2.6 Ligand 1 is readily characterized on the basis of its spectroscopic data (δP -18.7; for other data, see the Experimental Section), which supports the symmetrical structure. Preparation of COD Complexes. Reaction of the obtained PNNPPh ligand 1 with labile cod complexes of rhodium and iridium, [M(cod)2]BF4, afforded the dicationic 1:2 adducts 4, [( μ-κ2:κ2-PNNPPh){M(cod)}2](BF4)2, as yellow (4a) and red (4) Barrios, A. M.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11751. (5) Seyferth, D.; Welch, D. E.; Heeren, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1100. (6) Peterson, D. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1967, 8, 199.

Article

Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 23, 2010

6495

Figure 1. ORTEP views of the cationic parts of 4a (a), 5 (b), and 6 (c) with thermal ellipsoids at the 30% probability level. For 6, phenyl groups are omitted for clarity. Scheme 3

crystals (4b), respectively (Scheme 3). The composition and symmetrical structure of the products are confirmed by the single sets of NMR signals for the phthalazine, CH2P, and cod parts, and P coordination is verified for 4a by the doublet 31 P NMR signal (δP 28.0 (d, JP-Rh= 148.4 Hz)) resulting from coupling with the Rh nucleus. The two cod complexes have also been characterized by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1a; for 4b, see the Supporting Information), which reveals (1) square-planar geometry of the metal centers coordinated by the bridging μ-κ2:κ2-PNNPPh

ligand and the η2:η2-cod ligand, (2) twisting of the structure with respect to the N1-N2 bond (