Subscriber access provided by STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIV
Article
Discrimination of isoleucine and leucine by dimethylation-assisted MS3 Sheila Maibom-Thomsen, Søren Heissel, Ejvind Mørtz, Peter Hojrup, and Jakob Bunkenborg Anal. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01375 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 18, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Analytical Chemistry
Discrimination of isoleucine and leucine by dimethylation-assisted MS3
2 3
Sheila Maibom-Thomsen1,2, Søren Heissel1, Ejvind Mørtz2, Peter Højrup1, Jakob Bunkenborg2.
4
1: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55,
5
5230 Odense M, Denmark
6
2: Alphalyse A/S, Unsbjergvej 4D, 5220 Odense SØ, Denmark
7
*Corresponding author:
[email protected] 8
9
Abstract
10
Protein sequencing by mass spectrometry has transformed the field of biopharmaceutical analysis but a
11
missing part in the analytical toolkit is the ability to distinguish between the isomeric residues isoleucine
12
and leucine since it is a requisite for efficient analysis of the primary structure of proteins. To address this
13
need, we have developed a novel mass spectrometric method that combines reductive dimethylation and
14
MS3 fragmentation with LCMS peptide mapping. The dimethylation of peptide N-termini leads to intense
15
a1 ions upon collision induced fragmentation and further fragmentation of the isoleucine/leucine a1-ion
16
leads to informative spectra with fragments that can discriminate between the two isomers. The
17
methodology of a1-directed MS3 was applied to two antibodies in combination with the proteases trypsin,
18
thermolysin, chymotrypsin and pepsin to generate peptides exposing N-terminal I/L residues.
19
20
Introduction
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
21
Determination of the complete amino acid sequence of proteins remains a challenge in analytical
22
chemistry. Considerable effort is devoted to sequencing novel proteins with potential therapeutic benefit,
23
such as new monoclonal antibodies, and for quality control monitoring of recombinant proteins. To
24
establish the primary structure of proteins it is paramount to be able to distinguish between isoleucine and
25
leucine residues. The classic method of Edman degradation1 utilizes the retention time difference of
26
phenylthiohydantoin (PTH)-derivatized Ile/Leu residues. However, the two isomeric amino acids are not
27
distinguishable by mass due to their identical elementary composition. Several mass spectrometry-based
28
methods have been suggested to differentiate between Ile and Leu using dissociation methods that induce
29
side chain fragmentation2–9. Fragmentation of the isomeric m/z 86 immonium ion from leucine and
30
isoleucine yields a diagnostic ion at m/z 69 with higher intensity for isoleucine. For a given peptide
31
sequence, this means that MSn can only be used to differentiate immonium ions from peptide fragments
32
that contain a single Ile/Leu residue. Alternatively, ECD/ETD fragmentation of z-ions with
33
leucine/isoleucine residues at the N-terminus can be used to distinguish between the isomeric residues.
34
Here, leucine can fragment to a w-ion by isopropyl radical loss, whereas isoleucine predominantly loses an
35
ethyl group thus leading to fragments with distinguishable mass. Bagal et al.7 developed a comprehensive
36
LCMS method for de novo sequencing of monoclonal antibodies using a peptide sequence dependent
37
decision tree combination of MS3 or side-chain losses of z-ions employing ETD-HCD that can be
38
performed in a matter of days. Another approach combines germline homology data with the LCMS
39
analysis after cleavage with chymotrypsin and leucine aminopeptidase that to some extent prefer leucine
40
over isoleucine10.
41
Chemical derivatization that preserves the primary structure of peptides is often used to encode reactive
42
sites with the aim of extracting additional information. Dimethyl labeling adds two methyl groups to the α-
43
amino group of N-terminal residues and the ε-amino group of lysine residues. The mass added by the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 15
Page 3 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
44
methyl groups can be modified by using heavy stable isotopes, creating three compositionally different
45
methyl groups; light (-CH3), intermediate (-CD2H) and heavy (-13CD3), which adds 28, 32 and 36 Da,
46
respectively. Stable isotope dimethyl labeling is commonly used in quantitative proteomics, as it is fast,
47
easy, and inexpensive to use and offers almost 100% complete labeling11. The intense a1 ion observed in
48
HCD spectra of dimethyl labeled peptides reflects the N-terminal amino acid, and this information has
49
proven valuable in peptide identification12, disulfide-bridge determination13 and PTM validation14. We
50
noticed the similarity between the immonium ion from Ile/Leu residues and the dimethylated a1-ion. In
51
this study, we measured the Ile/Leu a1-ion fragmentation pattern by MS3 of stable isotope dimethyl
52
labelled reference peptides. The reference peptides were derivatized with three different isotopic dimethyl
53
labelling forms to elucidate the fragmentation behavior of the I/L a1-ions. The MS3 fragment ion pattern
54
of the dimethylated N-terminal I/L-residues showed fragmentation ions that can be used to discriminate
55
between the isomeric side-chains. Based on these results, we created an LCMS method where a1-ion
56
directed MS3 events are triggered by the presence of isomeric isoleucine and leucine a1 ions in the MS2.
57
We tested the method on two antibodies and the analysis of the antibodies was performed with two
58
different isotopic dimethyl labelling forms of four different proteolytic digests to test the method.
59
60
Experimental
61
Materials
62
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise noted. The 6-peptide mixture was the
63
Hi3 Phos B Standard from Waters (186006011). The monoclonal antibodies SiluTMLite SigmaMAb
64
Universal human Antibody Standard was from Sigma Aldrich (Germany) and Trastuzumab was a gift from
65
Chromacon (Switzerland)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 15
66 67
Methods
68
Antibody digestion
69
25µg of each monoclonal antibody was dissolved in Ultra-High Quality Milli-Q water (UHQ) (Elga,
70
18.2MΩ), reduced in 10mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 20min at 56°C and alkylated in 20mM iodoacetamide
71
(IAA) for 30min at room temperature (RT) in the dark. For trypsin (Promega, USA) chymotrypsin
72
(Worthington, USA) digestions, the antibody was diluted with UHQ and 1 M triethylammonium
73
bicarbonate (TEAB) to a final protein concentration of 1µg/µL in 100mM TEAB. For thermolysin
74
digestion the antibody was diluted with UHQ and 1M TEAB, 50mM CaCl2 (Merck Millipore, Germany) to
75
a final protein concentration of 1µg/µL in 100mM TEAB, 5mM CaCl2. The sample used for pepsin
76
digestion was acidified by diluting with 0.1% formic acid (FA) to a final protein concentration of 1µg/µL
77
(pH approximately 3). 50µL immobilized pepsin (Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA) was added to the
78
acidified sample. Digestion for the remaining samples were carried out with an enzyme to substrate ratio of
79
1:20 (w/w). The trypsin, chymotrypsin and pepsin digestion samples were incubated at 37°C overnight. The
80
thermolysin digestion sample was incubated at 70°C for 2h. Following digestion, the trypsin, chymotrypsin
81
and thermolysin digested samples were split in 2 samples, each containing 12.5µg peptides, in preparation
82
for dimethyl labeling. The liquid from the pepsin digestion sample was transferred to a new tube and the
83
remaining resin washed with 1M TEAB, which was then added to the pepsin digestion liquid. The pH of
84
this sample was checked and corrected with 1M TEAB until pH=8, and the sample was split in 2 for
85
dimethyl labeling.
86 87
Dimethyl labeling
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
88
Hi3 PhosB peptides were dissolved in 25µL 100mM TEAB and 35pmol of each was reacted with the
89
dimethyl labels. Light: 2µL 4% formaldehyde and 2µL 0.6M NaBH3CN was added. Intermediate: 2µL 4%
90
formaldehyde-d2 (Isotec, USA) and 2µL 0.6M NaBH3CN was added. Heavy: 2µL 4% 13C-formaldehyde-d2
91
and 2µL 0.6M NaBD3CN (Isotec, USA) was added. The samples were mixed and incubated at RT for 1h
92
on a shaker. The labeling was quenched with 8µL 1% ammonia solution (EMD Millipore, Germany) and
93
acidified for micropurification. The digested antibody peptides were diluted with 100mM TEAB to a final
94
volume of 50µL. Light: 4µL 4% formaldehyde and 4µL 0.6M NaBH3CN was added. Intermediate: 4µL 4%
95
formaldehyde-d2 and 2µL 0.6M NaBH3CN was added. The samples were incubated on a shaker at RT for
96
1h. The labeling was quenched with 16µL 1% ammonia solution and acidified with FA for
97
micropurification.
98 99
Micropurification
100
Reversed phase columns for micropurification were made in-house using Rainin GLS-L10 pipette tips
101
(Mettler Toledo, Germany) containing Empore C18 lining (3M Company, USA) below 1.5-2cm Poros R2
102
resin (20µm, Applied Biosystems, USA). The column was equilibrated with 100% acetonitrile (ACN),
103
followed by 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), the sample was loaded onto the column and washed with
104
0.1% TFA before the peptides were eluted using 60% ACN, 0.1% TFA. All purified peptides were
105
lyophilized.
106 107
Mass Spectrometry
108
Direct infusion MSn analysis of peptides
109
The lyophilized peptide mixtures were dissolved in 50% ACN, 0.1% FA to a final concentration of
110
100fmol/µL and transferred to a syringe and directly injected into a TSQ electrospray ionization (ESI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
111
source (Thermo Scientific, Germany) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer
112
(Thermo Scientific, Germany), using a Chemyx Fusion 101 syringe pump (Thermo Scientific, Germany) at
113
a flowrate of 3µL/min. MS1 was detected in the Orbitrap (resolution: 120.000, scan range: 400-1000m/z,
114
RF lens: 30%, AGC target: 500.000, minimum injection time: 100ms, 1 microscan). Relevant peptide ions
115
were manually selected for HCD MS2/MS3 analysis performed in the Orbitrap. For the unlabeled peptide
116
mixture Ile/Leu immonium ions (m/z 86.09) were selected and HCD MS3 analysis was performed in the
117
Orbitrap. For the dimethyl-labeled peptide mixtures, the a1 ions from the relevant peptides were selected
118
for MS3 at m/z 114.13, 118.15 and 122.17 for the light, intermediate and heavy labeled samples,
119
respectively, and MS3 events were performed on these in the scan range 50-150 m/z.
120 121
nanoLC-MSn analysis of digested antibodies
122
For antibody peptide analysis, the digested and dimethyl labeled peptides were dissolved in 0.1% FA
123
(solvent A) and approximately 1µg peptides were analyzed using an EASY-nanoLC 1000 system (Thermo
124
Scientific, Germany) coupled to the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer. The peptides were
125
loaded onto a 2.5cm in-house packed Reprosil-Pur 120 C18-AQ (5µm: Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany)
126
precolumn with an internal diameter of 100µm and eluted directly onto a 19cm in-house packed Reprosil-
127
Pur C18-AQ column (3 µm; Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany) with an internal diameter of 75µm. A 104min
128
HPLC gradient with a flowrate of 250 nL/min was used with a solvent B profile (95% ACN, 0.1% FA) in
129
the following increments: 1-3% for 3min, 3-25% for 80min, 25-45% for 10min, 45-100% for 3min and
130
100% for the final 8min. The peptides from each proteolytic digestion and each labelling form were run
131
separately.
132
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 15
Page 7 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
133
The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was operated in data dependent acquisition mode with an
134
MS1 Orbitrap scan (resolution: 120.000, scan range: 300-2000 m/z, AGC target: 400.000, maximum
135
injection time: 100ms, RF lens: 30%, 1 microscan). For each 3s cycle, ions above a 50.000 intensity
136
threshold and with a charge state of >+1 were selected for MS2. Monoisotopic peak determination was set
137
to peptide and dynamic exclusion switched on (exclude after 1 time, exclusion duration: 15s, mass
138
tolerance: ±10ppm, exclude isotopes). The selected MS2 precursors were isolated in the quadrupole at m/z
139
1.0, fragmented using HCD at a collision energy of 30 and detected in the Orbitrap (resolution: 30.000,
140
first mass: 100 m/z, AGC target: 200.000, maximum injection time: 54s). For each MS2 event one m/z
141
targeted trigger is assigned; 114.1283 m/z for the light and 118.1526 m/z for the intermediate dimethyl
142
labeled peptides. The presence of the targeted fragment triggers an MS3 event of the ion with scan range
143
50-125 m/z. The MS3 precursor is fragmented by HCD and analyzed by the Orbitrap (MS1 and MS2
144
isolation window: 0.8 m/z, Collision energy: 30%, AGC target: 5.0e4, Resolution: 15.000, maximum
145
injection time: 200ms, first mass: 50 m/z, 1 microscan).
146 147
Data analysis.
148
MS raw files were processed with Proteome Discoverer (version 2.0). The MS2 peak lists were searched
149
using Mascot (v. 2.4.1) against a FASTA database containing the SiluMab and Trastuzumab antibody
150
protein sequences and the protease sequences (10 entries). Carbamidomethylation of cysteines and
151
light/medium dimethylation of N-termini and lysine residues were set as fixed modifications and oxidation
152
of methionine and deamidation of asparagine as variable modifications. Enzyme specificity was set as
153
None and peptide identification was performed with a precursor mass tolerance of 10 p.p.m. and fragment
154
mass tolerance of 0.05 Th. The MS3 spectra were extracted with a python script using Multiplierz14 and the
155
intensities from the MS3 peak lists were used to assign fragment ion intensities: IIle (light) = Imz 69 + Imz 85 +
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
156
Imz 99 ; IIle (medium) = Imz 69 + Imz 89 + Imz 103; ILeu(light) = Imz 72 ; ILeu(medium) = Imz 76. The I-ratio is calculated
157
for peptides with IIle + ILeu > 0 as IIle /( IIle + ILeu). The I/L score was calculated for peptides with a Mascot
158
score above the Identity threshold and in most cases each assignment was supported by multiple
159
observations of the I/L- residue from different peptide sequences, modification and charge states. The
160
mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the
161
PRIDE15 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD009295 and 10.6019/PXD009295
162 163
Results and discussion
164
To examine the fragmentation pattern, we performed three different states of stable isotopic dimethyl
165
labeling on a standard peptide mixture (Hi3 PhosB, Waters). The derivatized peptides were analyzed by
166
direct infusion on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos, which has a lower mass range limit at m/z 50. MS3 spectra
167
of the a1 ions from the dimethyl labeled peptides IGEEYISDLDQLRK and
168
LITAIGDVVNHDPVVGDR are shown in Figure 1 a and b, respectively. Both Leu and Ile MS3 spectra
169
share a common fragment at m/z 58.065, 62.091 and 66.110 for the light, intermediate and heavy labeled
170
peptides, respectively. The fragmented isoleucine a1 ion has two intense unique fragments: a peak at m/z
171
69.070 that is constant in all labeling conditions and a peak from the loss of 29 Da from an ethyl group. In
172
addition, a less intense fragment originates from the loss of 15 Da from a methyl group. The leucine a1
173
MS3 HCD spectrum shows an intense diagnostic peak corresponding to the loss of a 42 Da propylene
174
group rather than the loss an isopropyl group. The proposed bond cleavages are shown in Fig. 1c and the
175
corresponding fragment masses are tabulated in Fig. 1d.
176
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 15
Page 9 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
177
We chose two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with known sequence to test the methodology. SILuLite and
178
Trastuzumab were digested, using the proteases trypsin, chymotrypsin, thermolysin, and pepsin,
179
respectively, to generate peptides with N-terminally exposed I/L. The digested peptides were dimethyl-
180
labeled with formaldehyde(light) and deuterated formaldehyde (intermediate). Each proteolytic digest and
181
labelling state was analyzed separately by nanoLC-MS and to limit the number of samples we did not
182
include the heavy label for this proof-of-concept analysis. Only one labelling state is necessary for the I/L
183
discrimination experiment but the experimental setup with two separate isotopic modifications of the
184
amine groups of the N-terminus and lysine residues has the advantages that the modifications can be
185
considered as fixed modifications due to the efficient chemistry of the dimethyl labelling and that the
186
parent and fragment ion assignments can be queried for consistency. We included a branch in the
187
acquisition scheme (Figure 2c), so that if an HCD tandem MS spectrum contained the diagnostic a1 ion
188
from I/L, this ion would be selected for HCD MS3 fragmentation. An example is shown in Figure 2 a,b
189
where the MS2 data of the dimethylated peptide can be confidently assigned and the intense a1-ion triggers
190
an MS3 event. Intensities from the MS3 peak lists were used to create a simple metric: IIle (light) = Imz 69 +
191
Imz 85 + Imz 99 and ILeu(light) = Imz 72. The masses are shifted according to the stable isotope labeling scheme
192
and the I-ratio is calculated as IIle /( IIle + ILeu). Spectra with I-ratio greater than 0.8 are assigned as
193
isoleucine and with a ratio less than 0.2 as leucine. The MS3 spectrum in Fig 2b has an I-ratio of 0 and is
194
assigned as leucine in agreement with the peptide identification. Spectra with an I-ratio between 0.2-0.8
195
with mixed intensities from I and L a1-ions are not used for classification to avoid cases where there is a
196
contribution from an a1-ion from co-eluting peptides within the MS2 precursor selection m/z window.
197
Running two different states of dimethyl labelling changes the MS2 selection window and reduces the
198
likelihood of having consistently confounding co-eluting peptides in both states. Using these criteria, we
199
did not observe any inconsistent assignment of I/L between the two labelling forms. The peptide-to-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 15
200
spectrum matches with an N-terminal I or L residue identified by Mascot database searching are
201
documented in Supplementary Table 1 along with the a1-directed MS3 spectrum associated to it. Using this
202
approach and the limited set of proteases, we could assign and confirm the identity of between 71-94% of
203
the isoleucine/leucine residues in each subunit (Figure 2d).
204
205
A significant advantage of the dimethylation prior to ionization and fragmentation is that it ensures that
206
short peptides do not cyclize and scramble16 which can confound multistage CID-based analysis. Likewise,
207
by fixing the readout to the N-terminal amino acid, the method does not suffer from the radical site
208
migration problem, that has been reported for w-ion based isoleucine/leucine discrimination9. The radical
209
site migration appears when applying both ETD and collisional activation and can be reduced by
210
minimizing the applied normalized collision energy9. A limitation of the proposed method is that only
211
Ile/Leu residues exposed at peptide N-termini can be distinguished. Finding means of exposing all leucine
212
and isoleucine residues in a protein as N-terminal residues on peptides well suited for LCMS analysis will
213
require optimization of digestion conditions and enzymes. Possibly this limitation can be circumvented
214
because labeling the N-terminal residue by dimethylation changes the immonium ion of the first residue
215
and the remaining residues could be analyzed in combination with a m/z 86 immonium ion based methods
216
for peptides that contain both an N-terminal and an internal Ile/Leu residue.
217
218
The presented method to distinguish Leu and Ile residues in peptide LC MS analysis can be extended by
219
increasing the panel of proteases and digestion conditions. To reduce analysis time it is possible to pool
220
different proteases digestions prior to analysis with the caveat that increasing complexity will increase the
221
likelihood of mixed I/L spectra from co-eluting co-fragmenting peptides. While not necessary for the I/L-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
222
discrimination the use of stable isotope labelling allows the peptide identifications and ion assignments to
223
be experimentally tested by the observation of mass changes consistent with the proposed peptide
224
sequence. The sensitivity of the method benefits from the altered fragmentation pattern caused by the
225
dimethylation which increases the signal of the a1 ion and the simplicity of the resulting data lends itself to
226
automation. Since the discrimination of Ile/Leu is independent of peptide identification and does not need
227
sequence dependent fragmentation, the method can easily be applied to de-novo sequencing of proteins.
228
229
230
231
Figure 1.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 15
232
MS3 fragmentation of dimethylated Ile/Leu a1-ion. (a,b) The a1 ion MS3 HCD-fragmentation spectra
233
of the dimethyl labeled peptides IGEEYISDLDQLRK (a) and LITAIGDVVNHDPVVGDR (b) using
234
three different stable isotope dimethylation labels. (c) The bonds proposed cleaved to produce the
235
observed fragment ions. (d) Theoretical mass values for each label state. The dimethylation sets an N-
236
terminal Ile/Leu residue apart from internal Ile/Leu immonium ions and the added mass of the stable
237
isotopic dimethyl labeling increases the set of differentially diagnostic ions to mass values above the
238
instrument cut-off at m/z 50 during MS3 fragmentation of the a1-ion.
239
240
Figure 2
241
Discriminating Ile/Leu during LCMS analysis. (a) HCD MS/MS spectrum of the dimethyl-labeled
242
peptide identified as LFPPSSEELQANK. (b) The MS3 spectrum triggered by the presence of the intense
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
243
a1 ion. The presence of the m/z 72 ion - and the absence of isoleucine-specific fragment ions – identifies
244
the N-terminal residue as leucine. (c) Acquisition scheme for the LCMS analysis. (d) Summary of the
245
combined identifications from all proteases and labeling states.
246
247
Supporting information available:
248
Table of MS3 I/L identifications
249
Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD009295.
250
251
Acknowledgements
252
The authors thank the Innovation Fund Denmark (5016-00002B) for the financial support, and the Villum
253
Center for Bioanalytical Sciences. We thank ChromaCon AG for providing the Antibody Trastuzumab.
254 255
Competing financial interests
256
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
257
258
259
References
260 261 262 263 264
(1) (2)
Edman, P. Method for Determination of the Amino Acid Sequence in Peptides. Acta Chem. Scand. 1950, 4, 283–293. Johnson, R. S.; Martin, S. A.; Biemann, K.; Stults, J. T.; Watson, J. T. Novel Fragmentation Process of Peptides by Collision-Induced Decomposition in a Tandem Mass Spectrometer: Differentiation of Leucine and Isoleucine. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59 (21), 2621–2625.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304
(3) (4)
(5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
(11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)
Page 14 of 15
Nakamura, T.; Nagaki, H.; Ohki, Y.; Kinoshita, T. Differentiation of Leucine and Isoleucine Residues in Peptides by Consecutive Reaction Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62 (3), 311– 313. Kjeldsen, F.; Haselmann, K. F.; Budnik, B. A.; Sørensen, E. S.; Zubarev, R. A. Complete Characterization of Posttranslational Modification Sites in the Bovine Milk Protein PP3 by Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Electron Capture Dissociation as the Last Stage. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75 (10), 2355–2361. Armirotti, A.; Millo, E.; Damonte, G. How to Discriminate between Leucine and Isoleucine by Low Energy ESI-TRAP MSn. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18 (1), 57–63. Lebedev, A. T.; Damoc, E.; Makarov, A. A.; Samgina, T. Y. Discrimination of Leucine and Isoleucine in Peptides Sequencing with Orbitrap Fusion Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86 (14), 7017–7022. Bagal, D.; Kast, E.; Cao, P. Rapid Distinction of Leucine and Isoleucine in Monoclonal Antibodies Using Nanoflow LCMS N. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89 (1), 720–727. Xiao, Y.; Vecchi, M. M.; Wen, D. Distinguishing between Leucine and Isoleucine by Integrated LC– MS Analysis Using an Orbitrap Fusion Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88 (21), 10757–10766. Zhokhov, S. S.; Kovalyov, S. V.; Samgina, T. Y.; Lebedev, A. T. An EThcD-Based Method for Discrimination of Leucine and Isoleucine Residues in Tryptic Peptides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 28 (8), 1600–1611. Poston, C. N.; Higgs, R. E.; You, J.; Gelfanova, V.; Hale, J. E.; Knierman, M. D.; Siegel, R.; Gutierrez, J. A. A Quantitative Tool to Distinguish Isobaric Leucine and Isoleucine Residues for Mass Spectrometry-Based De Novo Monoclonal Antibody Sequencing. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 25 (7), 1228–1236. Boersema, P. J.; Raijmakers, R.; Lemeer, S.; Mohammed, S.; Heck, A. J. R. Multiplex Peptide Stable Isotope Dimethyl Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4 (4), 484–494. Hsu, J.-L.; Huang, S.-Y.; Shiea, J.-T.; Huang, W.-Y.; Chen, S.-H. Beyond Quantitative Proteomics: Signal Enhancement of the A1 Ion as a Mass Tag for Peptide Sequencing Using Dimethyl Labeling. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4 (1), 101–108. Huang, S.-Y.; Hsieh, Y.-T.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, C.-C.; Sung, W.-C.; Chou, M.-Y.; Chen, S.-F. Automatic Disulfide Bond Assignment Using a 1 Ion Screening by Mass Spectrometry for Structural Characterization of Protein Pharmaceuticals. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (11), 4900–4906. Parikh, J. R.; Askenazi, M.; Ficarro, S. B.; Cashorali, T.; Webber, J. T.; Blank, N. C.; Zhang, Y.; Marto, J. A. Multiplierz: An Extensible API Based Desktop Environment for Proteomics Data Analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10 (1), 364. Vizcaíno, J. A.; Csordas, A.; del-Toro, N.; Dianes, J. A.; Griss, J.; Lavidas, I.; Mayer, G.; PerezRiverol, Y.; Reisinger, F.; Ternent, T.; et al. 2016 Update of the PRIDE Database and Its Related Tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (D1), D447–D456. Jia, C.; Wu, Z.; Lietz, C. B.; Liang, Z.; Cui, Q.; Li, L. Gas-Phase Ion Isomer Analysis Reveals the Mechanism of Peptide Sequence Scrambling. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86 (6), 2917–2924.
305
306
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 15 1 2 3 4 307 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 308 19 20 309 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
Table of Contents Figure
ACS Paragon Plus Environment