3D Printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based Microsupercapacitors - ACS

Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Article

3D Printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based Microsupercapacitors Wei Yu, Han Zhou, Ben Q Li, and Shujiang Ding ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13904 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Jan 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 19, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

3D Printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based Microsupercapacitors Wei Yu a, Han Zhou b, Ben Q. Li c*, and Shujiang Ding b* a

Micro/Nano-technology Research Center, State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems

Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, People’s Republic of China b

MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter and

Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, People's Republic of China c

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA

*Corresponding author: [email protected] (Ben Q. Li); [email protected] (Shujiang Ding)

1 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Abstract A novel 3D printing procedure is presented for fabricating carbon-nanotubes(CNTs)-based microsupercapacitors. The 3D printer uses a CNTs ink slurry with a moderate solid content and prints a stream of continuous droplets. Appropriate control of a heated base is applied to facilitate the solvent removal and adhesion between printed layers and to improve the structure integrity without structure delamination or distortion upon drying. The 3D-printed electrodes for microsupercapacitors are characterized by SEM, laser scanning confocal microscope and step profiler. Effect of process parameters on 3D printing is also studied. The final solid-state microsupercapacitors are assembled with the printed multilayer CNTs structures and polyvinyl alcohol-H3PO4 gel as the interdigitated microelectrodes and electrolyte. The electrochemical performance of 3D printed microsupercapacitors is also tested, showing a significant areal capacitance and excellent cycle stability.

Keywords：3D printing; carbon nanotube; microsupercapacitor; continuous droplets; additive manufacturing

1. Introduction The rapid advancement of portable and miniaturized autonomous electronic devices, such as active radio frequency identification tags, remote and mobile environmental sensors, microrobots and implantable medical devices, continuously generates demands for superior energy storage and power supply that can perform in various forms and conditions.1-4 Microsupercapacitors (MSCs), as emerging energy storage devices for these applications, have received much attention in research community owning to their attractive advantages such as superior power intensity,


Page 2 of 38

Page 3 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


good cycling stability, minimal maintenance expenses, wide working temperature range and desirable safety properties.5-7 In general, the performances of MSCs depend on the electrodes configuration, the manufacturing methods of the electrodes, the properties of their active materials and the selection of electrolytes.8 Microsupercapacitors can be classified into different structure types, namely, sandwich, rolllike and interdigital, depending on the configuration of electrodes used.9 The interdigital structure is considered to possess some salient features, such as ease of extension into three dimensions to allow for more electrode materials per unit area, and flexibility in adjusting electrode arrangement to minimize the internal impedance by narrowing the inter-electrode gaps.9 Recent years have seen considerable efforts devoted to develop MSCs, with main focus on the use of high-performance electrode materials and three-dimensional structures. Gnerlich et al. fabricated micro supercapacitors ruthenium oxide coated on multi-metallic microelectrodes.10 The property of the obtained MSCs is limited by the thin layer of the electrode material, and the large spacing between the electrodes. The interdigital electrodes, based on onion-like carbon, were created by Pech.11 However, the electrophoretic deposition process used cannot be applied to fabricate thicker electrodes. Moreover, the high-temperature process involved in producing onion-like carbon limits the potential application of these devices. Another strategy to obtain MSCs is to pattern MnO2/onion-like carbon by screen-printing on a flexible substrate;12 unfortunately the process requires masks or stamps, leading to an increase of fabrication costs. From a materials perspective, carbon is of low toxicity and low-cost and is traditionally used for electrodes. In fact, different nanostructured carbon-based materials have been studied for potential electrodes of MSCs; these include activated carbons13, carbon nanotubes14, carbide-



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

derived carbons15, 16, onion-like carbon9 and graphene17. Among them, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been widely studied because they possess a good electrical conductivity and a large surface area.18 Various processes also have been proposed to manufacture CNTs-based electrodes for energy storage applications. Kim et al. reported a fabrication approach with facile selective wettinginduced micro-patterning for CNTs-based MSCs.14 The method appears to offer some useful features including ease of processing, exclusion of severe condition, and achievement of a binder-free micro-patterning. However, the preparation of interdigital poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) slabs resorts to soft-lithography, and hence the method is in essence a traditional lithography technology, subject to associated caveats.1 In et al. presented the micro-pattern of CNTs arrays on polycarbonate sheets with the assist of the laser.19 The size of the electrodes is restricted by the morphology of the CNTs array. Thus, the technique is difficult to be employed for fabricating thick electrodes. In-situ growth is an alternative to attain interdigital electrodes, like vertically grown CNTs with the help of chemical vapor deposition (CVD).20, 21 In addition to the low volume density of materials in electrodes produced, the demand for high temperature conditions during the CVD process is an obstacle to the possible applications of the integration with some existing processes for micro devices. The limitations of these methods have inspired us to search for other simple, low-cost and high-throughput methods to fabricate MSCs with high performance. 3D printing, an additive manufacturing technique, offers a promising low-cost fabrication protocol for future MSCs.22 Among the recently developed 3D printing techniques, inkjet printing has been successfully applied to fabricate MSCs, which prints a pattern by propelling droplets of ink on demand. Pech et al. fabricated a carbon-based MSC on Si substrate by means


Page 4 of 38

Page 5 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


of the inkjet printing process.13 The ink, made by combining active material (activated carbon) with binder (polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE) into dispersion medium (ethylene glycol), was printed on pre-patterned gold metal. However, the processing efficiency, owing to the low solid contents, poses a main problem that limits the scaled-up application of the inkjet printing. Apart from this, the extrusion-based 3D printing has been successfully employed to make different structure forms with the graphene oxides as battery materials. An interesting feature of this process is that the printing technology allows a broad range of materials to be selected, including ceramics, metal alloys and polymers.22 Highly concentrated solid contents and shear-thinning behavior are prerequisite conditions for extrusion-based 3D printing, which make the printing inks display gel-like behavior and the extruded inks become fine filaments. Otherwise ， moderate solid contents ， or lower solid contents, would lead to unacceptable results with structural delamination or distortion. The prerequisites often are difficult to be realized. In the present paper, we propose a painless, cheap, and versatile 3D printing technique to fabricate CNTs-based MSCs. The printing inks ， which have moderate solid contents, are prepared by milling CNTs in a solution composed of isopropyl alcohol, ethylene glycol and dispersion agent. By the present 3D printing technique, printing inks are extruded via a micronozzle, with printing speeds and micronozzle-to-base distances controlled, and with predesigned base temperature and pre-programmed printing trajectory. One salient feature in this 3D printing protocol is the use of the heated base, which can lower the demand in highly concentrated solid contents in the traditional extrusion-based 3D printing. Also, the application of the heated basal can promote adhesion between the printed features, thereby improving the electrode structure integrity without occurance of delamination or distortion upon drying. In contrast to inkjet printing and the traditional extrusion-based 3D printing, the 3D printing



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

technique presented here is adaptable to various printing inks in that the characteristics of the inks such as solid content, viscosity and surface tension do not have strict limits associated with other methods presented above. The only requirement for the proposed 3D printing technique is that the printing inks can be extruded out of the micronozzle uniformly and steadily. Another important feature is that the proposed 3D printing technique injects inks in the shape of continuous droplets because of the moderate solid contents of CNTs inks, neither like drop by drop in inkjet printing, nor like the continuous filament in traditional 3D printing. Also, the moderate solid contents are also beneficial in improving the processing efficiency compared to inkjet printing. In what follows, this method is described in detail and is used to produce CNTsbased solid-state MSCs, with a measured specific area capacitance of 2.44 mF cm-2 and outstanding cycle stability.

2. Experimental section 2.1. Materials Carbon nanotubes (CNTs, TNIM) and dispersion agent (TNADIS) were obtained from Chengdu Organic Chemicals Co. Ltd., Chinese Academy of Science. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA), ethylene glycol (EG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Mw ≈ 95000 g mol-1) and H3PO4 (85 wt% aqueous solution) were obtained from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd.

2.2. CNTs Inks Preparation CNTs inks with varying solid loadings of 6 wt%, 7 wt% and 8 wt% were designed by thorough ball milling of IPA, dispersion agent, CNTs power and EG. Firstly, dispersion agent was evenly dispersed in IPA. Then, CNTs were added to the as-prepared solution, where dispersion agent


Page 6 of 38

Page 7 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


accounted for 30 wt% of CNTs weight. And until CNTs were adequately infiltrated, ball milling was employed in order to obtain homogenic and printable CNTs inks. The first stage was last for 6 h at 450 rpm speeds. After that, EG was added to the as-prepared inks and ball milling continued to mix into homogenized CNTs inks. The inks had a IPA to EG volume ratio of 5:1.

2.3. 3D printing 3D printing was executed on a 3-axis positioning stage, whose motion is controlled by a preprogrammed patterning procedure. CNTs inks were stored into a separate syringe (5 ml in size), which was fixed to a dispensing micronozzle (60 µm in diameter). The ink flow was controlled by an air-powered dispensing system. Applied printing pressures varied from 10 KPa to 30 KPa and move speed was set at 6 mm s-1. Glass plate, treated by C4F8 gas to make it hydrophobic, was selected as the basal to bear the extruded inks. And the micronozzle-to-glass plate distances ranged from 30 µm to 90µm. While printing, the glass plate basal was heated to 80 ℃ to promote the solvent removement. After printing, the interdigital electrodes were annealed to remove the residuary solvent at 120 ℃ for a night using a vacuum oven.

2.4. Microsupercapacitors packaging The PVA-H3PO4 electrolyte solution was yield as follows.14 300 ml deionized water, containing 20 g PVA, was vigorously stirred under 90 °C until to be transparent. The solution was taken out and kept completely cool. And then, 16 g H3PO4 was injected into the solution above and kept stirring at ambient temperature until to form a homogeneous solution. The PVAH3PO4 electrolyte solution was cast onto the interdigital electrodes and dried by airing. The dried PVA-H3PO4 film was lifted off the glass plate substrate, which will make the interdigital electrodes off together with it. For ease of testing, an adhesive copper tape was applied to



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

connection with the interdigital electrodes assisted by silver paint. In contrast, MSCs with no thermal treatment were also packed in the same process.

2.5 Characterization of electrode structures and of ink properties The viscosity study of CNTs inks was conducted on a Kinexus rheometer. All experiments were conducted using 20 mm steel flat plate geometry. The experiments were conducted at 25 ℃ throughout the process. The apparent viscosity was obtained as a function of shear rate (1-100 s1

). Contact angle measurements were collected using a contact angle meter (OCA20) with 10 µl

inks. The microscopic morphological characteristics of the interdigital electrodes were examined on a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-8010, Hitachi), a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM, OLS4000, Olympus) and a step profiler (XP-2, AMBIOS). And the roughness gage of the interdigital electrodes was investigated by a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM, OLS4000, Olympus). A CHI 660D electrochemical workstation was applied to characterize the electrochemical properties of MSCs in the two-electrode mode under ambient condition.

3. Results and discussion 3.1. 3D Printing Process for Microsupercapacitor Fabrication


Page 8 of 38

Page 9 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


The TEM image and Raman spectra of CNTs used for 3D printing are given in Fig. 1. For the present applications, the CNTs present an average diameter of 50nm and a length of 10-20 µm (see Figure 1a). Raman spectroscopy of CNTs is revealed in Figure 1b, which presents two obvious peaks at around 1328 cm-1 (D-band) and 1582 cm-1 (G-band). Figure 2 shows the 3D printing technique with the CNTs inks for fabrication of MSCs. Different from other 3D printing processes where the materials are frozen or extruded out at room temperature22, 23, the present 3D printing technique is by rapidly evaporating the dispersed phase by the heated basal. Specifically, CNTs inks are injected from the micronozzle controlled by an air-powered fluid dispenser and form a line of continuous droplets (see Figure 2a), which are neither the discrete droplets of inkjet printing13, nor the continuous filament of traditional 3D printing22. The work distance (h) between the micronozzle and glass plate is monitored by a camera, as shown in Figure 2a.The asobtained electrodes, after evaporation, (see the inset of Figure 2a) consist of randomly distributed

Figure 1. (a) TEM image of CNTs used for 3D printing. (b) Raman spectra of CNTs used for 3D printing. CNTs inks, allowing more effective electronic transport of the electrolyte.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 38

The present 3D printing process is based on the ejection of a stream of continuous ink droplets. At first, the printing inks were extruded from the micronozzle under the applied pressure and the static fluid pressure, obeying the law of conservation of mass, momentum and energy. The feed rate of printing inks is mainly affected by the nozzle diameter, ink level, applied pressure, ink density, and ink viscosity. After ejected out of micronozzle, ink drops were forced to deform under the tensile force, compressive force, gravity force, viscous forces and surface tension until they were separated from the micronozzle. The compression and gravity forces impel the ejected inks to spread on the basal, whereas viscous and surface tension forces tend to counterbalance the spreading. As the micronozzle moves to make printing, the ejected inks suffer from stretch, and thus tend to travel along the direction of the micronozzle movement. Once out from the micro nozzle, the ejected inks continued to spread under viscous forces and surface tension opposed the motion, and gravity force aided flow along the surface. At the same time, the ink dies out through solvent evaporation that accelerated by the heating from the basal, thereby forming the printed features. The 3D printing process presented above requires an appropriate ink. For the present application, the CNTs ink slurry was prepared as the required ink for 3D printing. To manage ink evaporation and union in the 3D printing so that a desired structure is formed, a mixed solvent of IPA (boiling point, 82.45 ℃) and EG (boiling point, 197.3 ℃) is used. The IPA evaporates during printing to allow partial consolidation of the printed features to ensure their structural integrity, while the EG serves as a moisturizer which endorses adhesion between two adjacent layers.


Page 11 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 2. Schematic illustration of 3D printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based MSCs. (a) Schematic of 3D printing process with a working distance h. (b) Optical images of 3D printing inks. (c) Apparent inks viscosity as a function of shear rate. (d) As-obtained interdigital electrodes. (e) The polymer gel electrolyte was casted and solidified. (f) A packaged MSCs. During 3D printing, the glass plate basal was heated to 80 ℃ (close to the boiling point of IPA) to expedite the IPA removal and strengthen the combination among layers. The presence of high boiling point solvents, EG, helps to maintain sufficient liquid of the deposited material to form a perfect union between 3D printing layers. The combined action of IPA and EG results in a structurally stable transition between each layers, a vulgar challenge for most of 3D printing technologies.23 The fluidity of the ink slurry is of crucial importance to ensure the continuous and uniform extrusion in the present 3D printing process. To better understand the effect of viscosity and to obtain the desired rheological behavior for 3D printing, CNTs inks with different solid loadings



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 38

of 6 wt%, 7 wt% and 8 wt% were designed and the apparent viscosity of these CNTs ink slurries were measured as a function of shear rates, as presented in Figure 2c. Apparently, shear thinning behaviors can be seen in the measurement results of every ink slurry, and the range of apparent viscosities are between 10-1 Pa·s at 1 s-1and 3×10-1 Pa·s at 1 s-1, which is less than those of traditional 3D filamentary printing (103-104 Pa·s at 1 s-1) but much more than those of inkjet printing (10-3 Pa·s at 1 s-1).24, 25 As expected, a higher solid loading produces a more viscous slurry. Ae more viscous slurry permits a shorter travel distance upon loading on the basal. As a consequence, the more viscous slurry is beneficial in printing a slenderer and continuous structure, a feature desirable of 3D printing. Nevertheless, an ink with too high a viscosity would make it difficult to prepare a well-dispersed slurry and to be extruded out. For the present study, a CNTs ink with a solid loading of 8 wt% is found to be preferable for the 3D printing of microsupercapacitors. The final structures of electrodes (Figure 2d) were printed layer-by-layer by controlling the motion in three-axis directions of 3D printer with a rate of 6 mm s-1. After that, a heat-treatment was applied to enable a thorough removal of the residuary solvent. The gel-state PVA-H3PO4 electrolyte then was selected based on a combination of factors such as the relatively excellent electrochemical performances, excellent mechanical properties, and good security features.22 The printed electrodes were combined with the PVA-H3PO4 electrolyte while at liquid state, and a solid-state supercapacitor is produced once the electrolyte was dried (see Figures 2d and 2e).14 In the present study, a sufficient amount of PVA-H3PO4 solution was used so that a continuous PVA-H3PO4 film was formed. This allows a 3D printed microsupercapacitor to be peeled off the basal in one piece (Figure 2e, f). The interdigital electrodes of the MSCs were connected with an adhesive copper tape assisted by silver paint and reinforced with the Kapton tapes to ensure good


Page 13 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


electrical contact. In addition, in order to facilitate the detachment of the assembled electrodePVA-H3PO4 film, the glass plate base is treated with C4F8 gas, allowing a molecular film to be formed between the basal and the electrolyte.26

3.2. Contact Angle Analysis of CNTs Ink Slurry Apart from the benefit of detachment, the C4F8 gas treatment modifies the surface structure of the glass plate and contributes to an increase of the contact angles between the glass plate base and CNTs inks, which is beneficial in obtaining a narrower 3D printing structures.27 For this study, the C4F8 gas treatment was conducted in a plasma etching machine for 40s and the contact angles for various CNTs loading inks measured, with results presented in Figure 3. Apparently, the contact angles increase gradually from 47.4 ° to 52.3 ° (Figure 3a-c) as the CNTs contents increase. In contrast, without the C4F8 gas treatment, the contact angle is significantly lower; in fact a contact angle of 16.3 ° was obtained with the CNTs content of 7wt% (Figure 3d). Based on

Figure 3. The contact angles for various CNTs loading inks on the gas-treated basal: (a) 6 wt%, (b) 7 wt%, (c) 8 wt%. and (d) The contact angle for 7 wt% CNTs content on the pristine basal. 13 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 38

the contact angle measurements, a higher CNTs content ink has a larger contact angle. Moreover, the basal with the C4F8 gas treatment appears to give a larger contact angle and a poorer wettability than those of the pristine basal, which can furnish the extruded inks with a limited travel distance upon loading on the basal. Based on the contact angle analysis, the CNTs ink with a solid loading of 8 wt%, combined with gas-treated basal, is considered suitable for the 3D printing.

3.3. Meterage of Structural Dimensions of 3D Printing Features With a working distance of 60 µm set between the nozzle and the base plate, the 3D printing process creates an interdigitated pattern of electrodes in a single pass. The height and width of structures printed with inks of various CNTs contents were recorded as a function of the driving gas pressure. Examination of figures 4a and 4b indicates that at 8 wt% CNTs content the height and width of 3D-printed features in a single pass steadily increases with an increase in the applied gas pressure from 10 KPa to 30 KPa. The height grows from 6.10 µm to 9.97 µm and the width from 162.88 µm to 304.78 µm. The as-obtained heights are much higher than the magnitude of inkjet printing, which is usually at a nanometer level.28 With the speed of micronozzle movement kept unchanged, a decrease of CNTs contents to 7 wt% and 6 wt% increases both the height and the width of printed features with the same applied gas pressures. This is because more inks can be squeezed out of the micronozzle with a lower CNTs content and viscosity slurry, which would result in the more accumulation, the longer flow time and larger flow scope of CNTs inks on the glass plate basal than those of CNTs content of 8wt%. Figures 4c and d depict the printed electrode architectures achieved at different work distance under the CNTs content of 7 wt%. For the work distance set at 60 µm, the height of printed features growes from 6.22 µm to 11.38 µm and the width of printed features from 236 µm to 374


Page 15 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


µm, as the applied gas pressure increases. When the work distance is reduced to 30 µm, the droplets streamed out from the micronozzle undergoes a larger structural deformation, resulting in a lower height and wider width, than that with the work distance of 60 µm. With the work distance elevated to 90 µm, the ink droplet has more room to relax, thereby resulting in a higher vertical dimension and a decrease of the contact area between the droplets and the basal. Thus, the higher the work distances are, the higher the heights of printed features and the smaller the



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 38

widths of printed features become, and vice versa. The results below, the work distance is all set at 60 µm unless indicated otherwise. In general, the CNTs ink with a solid loading of 8wt% printed on the gas-treated basal at the work distance of 90 µm appears to be a good choice to build high aspect ratio electrodes. However, with other two processing factors (i.e. roughness and manufacturing rate) considered above, a CNTs ink with a solid loading of 7wt% was adopted for the 3D printed results below

Figure 4. Meterage of structural dimensions on 3D printing features. (a) The effect of the CNTs contents on the height of the printed features. (b) The effect of the CNTs contents on the width of the printed features. (c) The influence of the work distance upon the height of the printed features. (d) The influence of the work distance upon the width of the printed features. Error bars represents a standard deviation of metric data for 3-12 models under various conditions.


Page 17 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


with the work distance of 60 µm. Moreover, in the text that follows, roughness measurement of 3D printing structures reveals that a lower solid loading yields a larger roughness, which is believed to be conducive to the sufficient contact between the interdigital electrodes and the electrolyte. Lastly, the processing efficiency is one of the major concerns for the heights of the printed features. Comprehensive above factors, CNTs ink with solid loadings of 7 wt% was eventually employed. So with the purpose to acquire the integrally MSCs, interdigitated electrode architectures with 5 layers were printed. The CNTs content was set at 7 wt%, applied gas pressure was set at 10 KPa, and the work distance was 60 µm. Once one layer was printed, the micronozzle would regulate position along the vertical direction to perform next printing layer on top of the previous one. The as-prepared MSCs with 5 layers printed are provided with 27.6 µm height, 235.7 µm width and 185 µm gap space. That height accounts for about 89% of the ideal value, while their width is nearly constant and is not subjected to the effect of the print layers. And such state also been reported in the previous article.24

3.4. Characterization of Surface Morphologies



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 38

Figure 5. Morphology of a interdigital electrode: (a) Optical picture of a interdigital electrode; (b) SEM picture of the top view of the interdigital electrodes, and the inset is the enlarged view of the selective region; porous structures of the electrode surface before (c) and after (d) the heat treatment to evaporate the dispersion agent by chemical decomposition; (e) enlarged view of the electrode surface in (c) and (f) enlarged view of the electrode surface in (d). After the interdigital electrodes were created, heat treatment (350℃ in air for 3 h) was applied to remove the dispersion agent of CNTs for some samples. It was noticed that delamination of the electrodes from the substrate did not occur during 3D printing, which is evident by examining the SEM images in Figure 5. Figure 5a illustrates the optical image of a 3D printed interdigital electrode, which is rather uniform in dimensions (see Fig. 5b). The inset image in Figure 5b displays a high magnification image of the selective region. Figures 5c and e are the enlarged views of the interdigital electrodes without heat treatment. Here it is obvious that CNTs are stacked together with a large randomly distributed porosity. This differs from the samples of


Page 19 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


the traditional 3D filamentary printing, which exhibits a filament microstructure with reorientation and alignment along the surface.23 Also, the interdigital electrodes are filled with macro pores, which allow the permeation and storage of the electrolyte. However, the as-3Dprinted CNTs are coated with the dispersion agent, and this coating may prevent good contact between CNTs and the electrolyte to reduce the electrochemical performance of the MSCs. After heat treatment at 350 oC to evaporate the dispersion agent via chemical decomposition, the desired bare CNTs obtained with the porous structure of the interdigital electrodes unchanged (see Figures 5d and 5f). A more porous 3D CNTs network is thought to possess a relatively higher specific area capacitance. Inspection of the inset in Figure 5b further reveals that the surface of the interdigital electrodes is not smooth. The roughness of the printed features was measured with the aid of the laser scanning confocal microscope. The results, which are presented in Figure 6, show that the roughness increases with the gas pressure from 0.482 µm to 0.622 µm for the ink of 7wt% CNTs content. Under the gas pressure of 10 KPa, a reduction of CNTs content to 6wt% yields the roughness measured at 0.799 µm, while an increase of CNTs content to 8 wt% results in a reduction of the roughness to 0.417 µm. In other words, the roughness of the printed features is affected by the printing conditions. It increases with an increase in the applied gas pressures, and with a decrease in the CNTs contents. The 3D-printed features with five layers also were tested, and the results are given in Figure 6. The measured roughness of 0.501 µm is larger than that of printed features with one layer. This may be attributed to the fact that as print layers increase in number, inter-layer defects increase, leading to a rougher surface morphology.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 38

3.5. Characterization of Electrochemical Properties of 3D Printing MSCs Figure 7a shows the schematic of a packaged MSC. To determine the electrochemical properties of the MSC, cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements of the MSCs with and without the heat-treatment were made. From Figures 7b and 7c, it is apparent that the CV curves of both MSCs exhibit a rectangular shape, displaying the successful realization of an electrical double layer at the electrode/electrolyte interface and efficient charge propagation across the electrodes.

Figure 6. Roughness measurement of 3D printing structures. From the measurements, the area capacitances of the MSCs without heat-treatment are calculated to be 0.732 mF cm-2 at the scan rate of 100 mV s-1 and 0.81 mF cm-2 at 50 mV s-1, respectively. The heat-treated MSCs, however, deliver the respective area capacitances of 4.25 mF cm-2 at 100 mV s-1 and and 4.69 mF cm-2 at 50 mV s-1, which are comparable to the value of other MSCs previously reported.6,

7, 11, 14, 17, 29

Clearly, such performance improvement comes from the

removal of the dispersion agent and better contact between the CNTs and the electrolyte. To further characterize the MSCs, galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) measurements were made at the constant current density of 50 µA cm-2 and 20 µA cm-2 and the results are given in Figure 7d and 7e. When operated at 50 µA cm-2 and 20 µA cm-2, the pristine CNTs-based MSCs


Page 21 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


exhibit the area capacitances of 0.39 mF cm-2 and 0.418 mF cm-2, respectively. This compares with the results obtained for the heat-treated MSCs, which have the larger area capacitances of 2.23 mF cm-2 and 2.44 mF cm-2. This behavior is essentially the same as that with the CV tests. Both CV and GCD measurements indicate that the 3D printed MCs are superior in electrochemical performance over most of the reported CNTs-based MSCs (see the data comparison in Table 1). The voltage-time responses of heat-treated MSCs during charging/discharging also show triangular-shaped GCD profiles with a longer time duration, derived from electrical double layer capacitance. According to the data above, the heat-treated MSCs carry a power density of 3.72 W cm-3 along with an energy density of 0.12 mWh cm-3, which is compatible with or better than other state-of-the-art MSCs.14,

29, 33, 34

The effect of

printed layer numbers on the electrochemical properties of the MSCs were also examined and the



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 38

results are given in Figure 7d-e. The measured data clearly shows that an increase in printed layers result in the corresponding enhancement of the area capacitances of the MSCs. Turning to the electrochemical stability of MSCs, the specific discharge capacitance is plotted against the number of the charge/discharge cycles for up to 2000 cycles, as shown in Figure 7f. From these curves, it is clear that the capacitance retains a steady value over the tested 2000

Figure 7. Electrochemical performance of 3D printed MSCs: (a) Schematic illustration of a packed MSC, (b, c) The CV curves of the packed MSCs, (d, e) The GCD curves of the packed MSCs and (f) The cyclic stability performance of the packed MSCs. cycles, revealing a good cycle stability. This suggests that the CNTs-based interdigital electrodes manufactured by 3D printing, with cross-linked porous structures, have a very little minimal structural modification or degradation in the course of repetitive charge/discharge cycles. The morphology of cross-linked porous structures thus is capable of coping with the fast and efficient migration of H+ ions. On the other hand, a drop of ~7 % in the capacitance of the treated MSCs was detected after about 500 cycles, presumably because the void left by the dispersion agent


Page 23 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


results in the rearrangement and structural modification of the electrodes. Nonetheless, the capacitance stays essentially unchanged for the remaining 1500 cycles. Table 1. Compare with the reported CNTs-based MSCs performance.

Carea

Electrode thickness

1

2.75 mF cm-2

5 µm

2

0.43 mF cm-2

50 μm

3

0.428 mF cm-2

80 μm

4

1.0 mF cm-2

10 μm

5

4.69 mF cm-2

27.6 μm

Measuring condition (electrolyte, potential window, and scan rate) PVA-H3PO4, -0.4-0.4 V, 0.01 V s-1 Ionogel electrolyte, 0-3 V, 0.1 V s-1 Ionic liquid electrolyte, -0.5-0.5 V, 0.05 V s-1 Polymer-gel electrolyte, 0-2.8 V, 1 mV s-1 PVA-H3PO4, 0-1V, 0.05 V s-1

Reference 14 Reference 30 Reference 31 Reference 32 This work

4. Concluding remarks This paper has successfully demonstrated a facile manufacturing process for 3D printing of carbon nanotubes-based microsupercapacitors (MSCs). The present 3D printing technique is unique in that it is easy to apply and environment-friendly, and produces a free standing electrode. This technique can use a wide variety of inks with various CNTs contents. The widths and heights of the printed patterns can be readily tuned by 3D printing process parameters such the diameter of micronozzle, applied printing pressure, CNTs contents and work distance. Appropriate control of heating at base is beneficial in facilitating the solvent removal by evaporation and adhesion among printed layers and in improving the structural integrity without delamination or distortion upon drying. As a demonstration, this method was used to 3D print MSCs. The electrochemical tests show that the 3D printed MSCs deliver a specific capacitance of 2.44 F cm-2 and exhibit superior cycle stability and reliable energy storage capacity,



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

suggesting that this mini power source device is a promising candidate for energy storage applications. Our experience also suggests that a variety of other special materials, as long as they are dispersed well in the agent, can be used by the 3D printing technique presented here for energy storage and other applications.

Acknowledgments This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51273158, 21303131), the Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No. 2012JQ6003, 2013KJXX-49) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for financial support. Partial support of this work by the Shaanxi Department of Science and Technology Development (Grant NO. 2013KTCQ01-48) is acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the International Research Centre for Dielectric for TEM characterization; Micro-nano Manufacturing Centre for SEM characterization; Center of Nanomaterials for Renewable Energy (CNRE) for viscous characterization.

References: 1. Hu, H.; Pei, Z.; Ye, C. Recent Advances in Designing and Fabrication of Planar MicroSupercapacitors for On-Chip Energy Storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2015, 1, 82-102. 2. Wu, Z. S.; Feng, X.; Cheng, H. M. Recent Advances in Graphene-Based Planar MicroSupercapacitors for On-Chip Energy Storage. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2014, 1 (2), 277-292. 3. Wang, Z. L. Self-Powered Nanosensors and Nanosystems. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (2), 280-285.


Page 24 of 38

Page 25 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


4. Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, X.; Yuan, C.; Lou, X. W. Recent Advances in Metal OxideBased Electrode Architecture Design for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (38), 5166-5180. 5. Li, L.; Peng, S.; Wu, H. B.; Yu, L.; Madhavi, S.; Lou, X. W. A Flexible Quasi-Solid-State Asymmetric Electrochemical Capacitor Based On Hierarchical Porous V2O5 Nanosheets On Carbon Nanofibers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5 (17), 1500753. 6. Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Yang, S.; Dong, R.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Ultraflexible in-Plane MicroSupercapacitors by Direct Printing of Solution-Processable Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (11), 2217-2222. 7. Wu, Z. S.; Parvez, K.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Graphene-Based in-Plane Micro-Supercapacitors with High Power and Energy Densities. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2487-2495. 8. Wu, Z. S.; Winter, A.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y.; Turchanin, A.; Feng, X.; Mullen, K. ThreeDimensional Nitrogen and Boron Co-Doped Graphene for High-Performance All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (37), 5130-5135. 9. Shen, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Kang, F. A High-Performance Three-Dimensional Micro Supercapacitor Based On Self-Supporting Composite Materials. J. Power Sources 2011, 196 (23), 10465-10471. 10. Gnerlich, M.; Ben-Yoav, H.; Culver, J. N.; Ketchum, D. R.; Ghodssi, R. Selective Deposition of Nanostructured Ruthenium Oxide Using Tobacco Mosaic Virus for MicroSupercapacitors in Solid Nafion Electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 649-656.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 38

11. Pech, D.; Brunet, M.; Durou, H.; Huang, P.; Mochalin, V.; Gogotsi, Y.; Taberna, P.; Simon, P. Ultrahigh-Power Micrometre-Sized Supercapacitors Based On Onion-Like Carbon. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5 (9), 651-654. 12. Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, C. X.; Wong, J. I.; Sun, X. W.; Yang, H. Y. Printed All-Solid Flexible Microsupercapacitors: Towards the General Route for High Energy Storage Devices. Nanotechnology 2014, 25 (9), 094010. 13. Pech, D.; Brunet, M.; Taberna, P.; Simon, P.; Fabre, N.; Mesnilgrente, F.; Conédéra, V.; Durou, H. Elaboration of a Microstructured Inkjet-Printed Carbon Electrochemical Capacitor. J. Power Sources 2010, 195 (4), 1266-1269. 14. Kim, S.; Koo, H.; Lee, A.; Braun, P. V. Selective Wetting-Induced Micro-Electrode Patterning for Flexible Micro-Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (30), 5108-5112. 15. Chmiola, J.; Largeot, C.; Taberna, P. L.; Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Monolithic Carbide-Derived Carbon Films for Micro-Supercapacitors. Science 2010, 328 (5977), 480-483. 16. Heon, M.; Lofland, S.; Applegate, J.; Nolte, R.; Cortes, E.; Hettinger, J. D.; Taberna, P.; Simon, P.; Huang, P.; Brunet, M.; Gogotsi, Y. Continuous Carbide-Derived Carbon Films with High Volumetric Capacitance. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (1), 135-138. 17. El-Kady, M. F.; Kaner, R. B. Scalable Fabrication of High-Power Graphene MicroSupercapacitors for Flexible and On-Chip Energy Storage. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4 (2), 1475. 18. Yu, W.; Li, B. Q.; Ding, S. J. Electroless Fabrication and Supercapacitor Performance of Cnt@Nio-Nanosheet Composite Nanotubes. Nanotechnology 2016, 27 (7), 075605.


Page 27 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


19. In, J. B.; Lee, D.; Fornasiero, F.; Noy, A.; Grigoropoulos, C. P. Laser-Assisted Simultaneous Transfer and Patterning of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays On Polymer Substrates for Flexible Devices. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (9), 7858-7866. 20. Jiang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Lin, L. 3D Supercapacitor Using Nickel Electroplated Vertical Aligned Carbon Nanotube Array Electrode. IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical System 2010, 1171-1174. 21. Kaempgen, M.; Chan, C. K.; Ma, J.; Cui, Y.; Gruner, G. Printable Thin Film Supercapacitors Using Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2009, 9 (5), 1872-1876. 22. Fu, K.; Wang, Y.; Yan, C.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Dai, J.; Lacey, S.; Wang, Y.; Wan, J.; Li, T.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Hu, L. Graphene Oxide-Based Electrode Inks for 3D-Printed Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (13), 2587-2594. 23. Jakus, A. E.; Secor, E. B.; Rutz, A. L.; Jordan, S. W.; Hersam, M. C.; Shah, R. N. ThreeDimensional Printing of High-Content Graphene Scaffolds for Electronic and Biomedical Applications. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (4), 4636-4648. 24. Sun, K.; Wei, T.; Ahn, B. Y.; Seo, J. Y.; Dillon, S. J.; Lewis, J. A. 3D Printing of Interdigitated Li-Ion Microbattery Architectures. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (33), 4539-4543. 25. Rho, Y.; Kang, K. T.; Lee, D. Highly Crystalline Ni/Nio Hybrid Electrodes Processed by Inkjet Printing and Laser-Induced Reductive Sintering Under Ambient Conditions. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (16), 8976-8985.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 38

26. Jiang, C.; Li, X.; Tian, H.; Wang, C.; Shao, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, L. Lateral Flow through a Parallel Gap Driven by Surface Hydrophilicity and Liquid Edge Pinning for Creating Microlens Array. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014, 6 (21), 18450-18456. 27. Yuan, L.; Wu, T.; Zhang, W.; Ling, S.; Xiang, R.; Gui, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, Z. Engineering Superlyophobic Surfaces On Curable Materials Based On Facile and Inexpensive Microfabrication. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 2 (2), 6952-6959. 28. Chen, P.; Chen, H.; Qiu, J.; Zhou, C. Inkjet Printing of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Ruo2 Nanowire Supercapacitors On Cloth Fabrics and Flexible Substrates. Nano Res. 2010, 3 (8), 594-603. 29. Gao, W.; Singh, N.; Song, L.; Liu, Z.; Reddy, A. L. M.; Ci, L.; Vajtai, R.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, B.; Ajayan, P. M. Direct Laser Writing of Micro-Supercapacitors On Hydrated Graphite Oxide Films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6 (8), 496-500. 30. Hsia, B.; Marschewski, J.; Wang, S.; In, J. B.; Carraro, C.; Poulikakos, D.; Grigoropoulos, C. P.; Maboudian, R. Highly Flexible, All Solid-State Micro-Supercapacitors From Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes. Nanotechnology 2014, 25 (5), 055401. 31. Jiang, Y. Q.; Zhou, Q.; Lin, L. Planar Mems Supercapacitor Using Carbon Nanotube Forests. IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical System 2009, 587-590. 32. Hahm, M. G.; Leela Mohana Reddy, A.; Cole, D. P.; Rivera, M.; Vento, J. A.; Nam, J.; Jung, H. Y.; Kim, Y. L.; Narayanan, N. T.; Hashim, D. P.; Galande, C.; Jung, Y. J.; Bundy, M.; Karna, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Vajtai, R. Carbon Nanotube–Nanocup Hybrid Structures for High Power Supercapacitor Applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (11), 5616-5621.


Page 29 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


33. Beidaghi, M.; Wang, C. Micro-Supercapacitors Based On Interdigital Electrodes of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotube Composites with Ultrahigh Power Handling Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22 (21), 4501-4510. 34. El-Kady, M. F.; Strong, V.; Dubin, S.; Kaner, R. B. Laser Scribing of High-Performance and Flexible Graphene-Based Electrochemical Capacitors. Science 2012, 335 (6074), 1326-1330.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

TOC graphic


Page 30 of 38

Page 31 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 1. (a) TEM image of CNTs used for 3D printing. (b) Raman spectra of CNTs used for 3D printing. The TEM image and Raman spectr 150x60mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of 3D printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based MSCs. (a) Schematic of 3D printing process with a working distance h. (b) Optical images of 3D printing inks. (c) Apparent inks viscosity as a function of shear rate. (d) As-obtained interdigital electrodes. (e) The polymer gel electrolyte was casted and solidified. (f) A packaged MSCs. Figure 2 shows the 3D printing 177x93mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 32 of 38

Page 33 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 3. The contact angles for various CNTs loading inks on the gas-treated basal: (a) 6 wt%, (b) 7 wt%, (c) 8 wt%. and (d) The contact angle for 7 wt% CNTs content on the pristine basal. For this study, the C4F8 gas t 85x85mm (300 x 300 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 4. Meterage of structural dimensions on 3D printing features. (a) The effect of the CNTs contents on the height of the printed features. (b) The effect of the CNTs contents on the width of the printed features. (c) The influence of the work distance upon the height of the printed features. (d) The influence of the work distance upon the width of the printed features. Error bars represents a standard deviation of metric data for 3-12 models under various conditions. Examination of figures 4a and 177x125mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 34 of 38

Page 35 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 5. Morphology of a interdigital electrode: (a) Optical picture of a interdigital electrode; (b) SEM picture of the top view of the interdigital electrodes, and the inset is the enlarged view of the selective region; porous structures of the electrode surface before (c) and after (d) the heat treatment to evaporate the dispersion agent by chemical decomposition; (e) enlarged view of the electrode surface in (c) and (f) enlarged view of the electrode surface in (d). It was noticed that delaminat 85x97mm (300 x 300 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 6. Roughness measurement of 3D printing structures. The results, which are present 85x60mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 36 of 38

Page 37 of 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 7. Electrochemical performance of 3D printed MSCs: (a) Schematic illustration of a packed MSC, (b, c) The CV curves of the packed MSCs, (d, e) The GCD curves of the packed MSCs and (f) The cyclic stability performance of the packed MSCs. Figure 7a shows the schematic 177x83mm (300 x 300 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

TOC graphic 85x42mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 38 of 38

3D Printing of Carbon Nanotubes-Based Microsupercapacitors - ACS

Recommend Documents