Subscriber access provided by UB + Fachbibliothek Chemie | (FU-Bibliothekssystem)
Article
Aerosolization of Ebola Virus Surrogates in Wastewater Systems Kaisen Lin, and Linsey Chen Marr Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04846 • Publication Date (Web): 26 Jan 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 27, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 29
1
Environmental Science & Technology
Aerosolization of Ebola Virus Surrogates in Wastewater Systems
2 3
Kaisen Lin and Linsey C. Marr*
4 5
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 418 Durham Hall,
6
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
7 8 9
*Corresponding author
10
Mailing address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech,
11
418 Durham Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
12
Telephone: (540) 231-6071
13
E-mail: lmarr@vt.edu
14 15 16
Key words: Ebola, virus, bioaerosol, inhalation, wastewater
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
18
Abstract
19
Recent studies have shown that Ebola virus can persist in wastewater. We evaluated the
20
potential for Ebola virus surrogates to be aerosolized from three types of wastewater
21
systems: toilets, a lab-scale model of an aeration basin, and a lab-scale model of
22
converging sewer pipes. We measured the aerosol size distribution generated by each
23
system, spiked Ebola virus surrogates (MS2 and Phi6) into each system, and determined
24
the emission rate of viruses into the air. The number of aerosols released ranged from 105
25
to 107 per flush from the toilets or per minute from the lab-scale models, and the total
26
volume of aerosols generated by these systems was ~10-9 to 10-7 mL per flush or per
27
minute in all cases. MS2 and Phi6, spiked into toilets at an initial concentration of 107
28
plaque-forming units per milliliter (PFU mL-1), were not detected in air after flushing.
29
Airborne concentrations of MS2 and Phi6 were ~20 PFU L-1 and ~0.1 PFU L-1,
30
respectively, in the chambers enclosing the aeration basin and sewer models. The
31
corresponding emission rates of MS2 and Phi6 were 547 PFU min-1 and 3.8 PFU min-1,
32
respectively, for the aeration basin and 79 PFU min-1 and 0.3 PFU min-1 for the sewer
33
pipes.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 29
Page 3 of 29
34
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC ART
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 29
36
Introduction
37
The Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa that began in 2014 is the largest
38
in history. It has caused 11,310 deaths as of June 2016 with a fatality rate of 53%.1 The
39
particular species causing the current outbreak is Zaire ebolavirus.2, 3 EVD is transmitted
40
via direct contact with blood, body fluids, and objects contaminated with body fluids.4-6
41
Transmission is not thought to occur via air, water, or food, although in theory,
42
aerosolization of blood and body fluids has the potential to lead to infection, as aerosol
43
transmission has been demonstrated in nonhuman primates.7-10 Besides inhalation of
44
aerosolized virus, contact of unprotected mucous membranes such as the eyes and mouth
45
with aerosolized virus is also a potential route of transmission.
46
EVD patients can produce large volumes of diarrhea that contain up to 107
47
genome copies of the virus per milliliter.11-13 The World Health Organization
48
recommends direct disposal of contaminated liquid waste into the sewage system without
49
disinfection,14 but this guidance has raised concerns among environmental engineers
50
because workers may come into close contact with wastewater,15 and as few as 10
51
infectious viral particles are sufficient to infect individuals.16-18 Recent studies indicate
52
that Ebola virus and surrogates can survive for at least 1 day in wastewater.19,
53
addition, we have shown that at least 94% of virions in wastewater remain in the liquid
54
fraction rather than partition to biosolids and material surfaces.21 Thus, the vast majority
55
of Ebola virus is likely to remain mobile in wastewater systems and maintain the
56
potential to be aerosolized during certain processes.
20
In
57
Current risk assessments on inhalation exposure to Ebola virus in wastewater
58
systems are based mainly on data from studies of bacteria, not viruses, conducted on
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
59
toilets and wastewater treatment plants.22 Bacterial and fungi, including pathogenic ones,
60
have been detected in the surrounding air,23-32 demonstrating that wastewater treatment
61
processes have the potential to generate bioaerosols. However, few studies have focused
62
on aerosolization of viruses in wastewater systems.33-35 Aerosolization of viruses could be
63
significantly different from aerosolization of bacteria due to dissimilarities in their size,
64
structure, and surface properties. One important difference is that bacteria partition
65
mainly to biosolids while viruses remain suspended in the liquid.21, 36 Even fewer studies
66
have focused on aerosolization from the wastewater collection system,30 yet processes
67
such as converging flows at pipe junctions and high-pressure cleaning have the potential
68
to generate aerosols as well.
69
The goal of this research is to characterize the aerosolization of Ebola virus
70
surrogates during the regular operation and maintenance of wastewater systems. This
71
study investigates flush toilets, a laboratory-scale aeration basin model, and a laboratory-
72
scale sewer model. Specific objectives are to determine the size distribution of aerosols
73
produced by each system and the emission rate of aerosolized Ebola virus surrogates
74
spiked into the system.
75 76
Materials and Methods
77
Measurement of Aerosol Size Distribution in Model Systems. The size distribution of
78
aerosols generated by flush toilets, a lab-scale aeration basin, and a lab-scale sewer model
79
of converging pipes was measured inside custom-designed chambers. Aerosols were
80
measured in triplicate experiments for each system using a scanning mobility particle
81
sizer (TSI SMPS 3936) for particles 14-700 nm and an aerodynamic particle size
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
82
spectrometer (TSI APS 3321) for particles 0.5-20 µm. Results were combined using the
83
TSI Data Merge program to generate a composite size distribution and corresponding
84
fitted function using the default parameters. Prior to measurement, each chamber was
85
flushed with air from a gas cylinder passed through a high-efficiency particulate air
86
(HEPA) capsule to reduce the background particle concentration to below 50 cm-3.
87
Toilet-generated aerosols were characterized in a chamber fashioned by fitting a
88
46 × 51 cm2 acrylic sheet over the toilet bowl. As shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting
89
Information, the sheet had a 15 × 15 cm2 square cutout with a Tedlar bag sealed over it to
90
allow the chamber volume to shrink as air was removed for sampling. The sheet
91
supported a fan to promote mixing, three ports, and a temperature and humidity logger
92
(Omega OM-EL-USB-2-LDC). The initial chamber volume of 15 L was estimated by
93
filling the bowl and bag with water.
94
Measurements were conducted on two commercial toilets in public restrooms at
95
Virginia Tech. Both of them had a Zurn Aquaflush automatic flushing mechanism. The
96
acrylic sheet was taped to the bowl to ensure airtightness, and the chamber was flushed
97
with HEPA-filtered air. One liter of anaerobically-digested sludge, used to mimic the
98
consistency of loose stool associated with EVD, was poured into the toilet. The sludge
99
was obtained from the Christiansburg Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) in Virginia,
100
and its properties are shown in Table S1. The toilet was then flushed, and the aerosol size
101
distribution was measured.
102
The lab-scale aeration basin, shown in Figure S2, consisted of a bubble disk
103
diffuser (FlexAir, 22.9 cm diameter) placed at the bottom of an 11.4 L plastic basin. The
104
basin was placed in a 200 L polyethylene glove bag (Sigma AtmosBag) that served as a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 29
Page 7 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
105
chamber, supported by a PVC frame with dimensions of 86 × 66 × 61 cm3. Three
106
portable mini-fans were used to promote mixing inside the chamber
107
The basin was filled with mixed liquor collected from the Christiansburg WWTP,
108
and the top of the diffuser was submerged 10 cm below the liquid surface. Table S1
109
shows the characteristics of the mixed liquor. HEPA-filtered air was then pumped
110
through the diffuser at a flow rate of 10 L min-1, and excess air was vented to maintain a
111
constant volume in the chamber. The system ran for 1 h to achieve steady-state
112
conditions, confirmed by measurement of the aerosol concentration. The aerosol size
113
distribution was then measured. The concentration of dissolved oxygen in the mixed
114
liquor increased to 4 mg L-1 at the end of the experiment compared to 2 mg L-1 in the
115
fresh mixed liquor, indicating sufficient aeration.
116
The lab-scale sewer model of converging pipes, shown in Figure S3, comprised a
117
35 × 35 cm2 concrete model with two inflow open channels of diameter of 3.8 cm
118
meeting at a 45º angle and exiting via a single outflow open channel with the same
119
diameter. The channels were connected to hoses, and a sump pump in an 18.9 L bucket
120
circulated mixed liquor through the system. The flow velocity at the outlet was 0.4 m s-1,
121
and the Reynolds number was 1.8 × 104, indicative of turbulent flow and comparable to
122
that of other lab-scale studies37, 38 but lower than typically found in real sewer systems.
123
The section of converging pipes was enclosed in a cylindrical chamber with a plastic lid,
124
creating a 10 L space above the channels, and two fans were used to promote mixing
125
inside the chamber. The system was allowed to run for 30 min to reach steady state,
126
confirmed by measurement of the aerosol concentration, prior to determination of the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
127
aerosol size distribution. HEPA-filtered air was used to make up that removed by the
128
SMPS and APS during measurements.
129
Aerosolization of Ebola Virus Surrogates. Emission rates of two surrogates for
130
Ebola virus, MS2 and Phi6, were determined in each wastewater system. MS2 (ATCC
131
15597-B1) is an unenveloped, single-stranded, RNA bacteriophage with Escherichia coli
132
as its host. Phi6 (kindly provided by P. Turner of Yale University, New Haven, CT) is a
133
lipid-enveloped, double-stranded, RNA bacteriophage with Pseudomonas syringae as its
134
host. Although these two bacteriophages do not mimic Ebola virus’ filamentous,
135
enveloped structure, they have been identified as the best available options for
136
investigating the persistence and partitioning of Ebola virus in wastewater.19-21
137
MS2 and Phi6 were propagated from stock suspensions according to established
138
methods.39 The stocks had concentrations of 109-1011 plaque-forming units per milliliter
139
(PFU mL-1). Briefly, 50 µL of MS2 stock was mixed with 200 µL of overnight cultured
140
E. coli and 4.75 mL of lysogeny broth (LB) soft agar. The mixture was poured on LB
141
plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Soft-agar layer was removed to a flask, and 3 mL
142
of LB liquid medium was added per plate. The culture was then incubated with aeration
143
at 37 °C for 4 h. MS2 in suspension was harvested by low-speed centrifugation through
144
0.22 µm filters at 6,000 rpm for 1 min. For Phi6, P. syringae and tryptic soy broth (TSB)
145
were used instead, and incubation took place at 25 °C.
146
For toilets, 1 L of fresh anaerobically-digested sludge containing MS2 and Phi6 at
147
a concentration of 107 PFU mL-1 was poured into the toilet bowl. No interference
148
between MS2 and Phi6 was observed in a separate test, described in the Supporting
149
Information. HEPA-filtered air was passed through the toilet chamber, and the toilet was
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 29
Page 9 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
150
then flushed. Aerosols were collected onto two 25-mm gelatin filters (SKC Inc. 225-
151
9551) installed in stainless steel filter holders (Advantec 304500) at a flow rate at 2 L
152
min-1 for 20 min. The inlet was positioned 10 cm above the water level in toilets. During
153
the sampling process, HEPA-filtered makeup air was provided to the chamber. After
154
sample collection, one gelatin filter was dissolved in 3 mL of LB for analysis of MS2,
155
and one was dissolved in TSB for analysis of Phi6. Ten-fold serial dilutions ranging from
156
1:10 to 1:10-9 were prepared from the gelatin-filter-derived solutions. Aliquots of 50 µL
157
were used for bacteriophage quantification by plaque assay. The plates were incubated at
158
37 °C and 25 °C for MS2 and Phi6, respectively, for 24 h. The number of plaques on
159
each plate was counted, and bacteriophage concentrations were determined by
160
multiplying the number by the dilution coefficient.
161
The aeration basin and sewer models were filled with 10 L and 15 L, respectively,
162
of mixed liquor containing MS2 and Phi6 at a concentration of 107 PFU mL-1. As
163
described previously, steady-state conditions were established. Aerosol samples were
164
then collected onto gelatin filters, as described for the toilet experiments, at a point 20 cm
165
above the center of the aeration basin and 10 cm above the junction of the sewer model,
166
midway between the fluid surface and the top of the chamber. Excess air was vented in
167
the aeration basin and makeup air was added to the sewer model chamber to maintain
168
flow balance. The interior surfaces of both chambers were cleaned using 70% ethanol
169
after each experiment.
170
Calculation of Emission Rates. Emission rates were calculated in units of PFU
171
min-1. Based on mass balance, the airborne bacteriophage concentration in a well-mixed
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 29
172
chamber can be described by Eq. 1. At steady-state conditions, the emission rate of Ebola
173
virus surrogates can be determined from Eq. 2: ( )
174
= − − + −
= − + + +
175
(1) (2)
176 177
where, is the flow rate of particle-free air, is the bacteriophage concentration in
178
the inflow, which equals zero, is the flow rate of excess air that is vented, is the
179
airborne bacteriophage concentration, is the flow rate of the air sampling pump, E is
180
the emission rate of bacteriophage from the wastewater system, k is the aerosol wall loss
181
coefficient, and V is the chamber volume. The aerosol wall loss coefficients were
182
determined experimentally to be 0.123 min-1 and 0.229 min-1 for the aeration basin and
183
sewer models, respectively. These values were determined using the same method
184
described in our previous work.40 Additional details are provided in the Supporting
185
Information.
186 187
Results
188
Aerosol Size Distributions. Aerosol production by two commercial toilets containing
189
anaerobically-digested sludge, a lab-scale aeration basin containing mixed liquor, and a
190
lab-scale model of converging sewer pipes containing mixed liquor was measured over
191
the size range of 14 nm to 20 µm. Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviation of total
192
aerosol number, total aerosol volume, and mode diameter from merged, fitted data from
193
the SMPS and APS across three replicates for each system.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
194
The total number of aerosols generated by toilets ranged from 1.7 to 2.6 million
195
per flush, and the total volume of aerosols produced was on the order of 10-9 to 10-8 mL.
196
These aerosols could also be considered to be very small droplets because they contain
197
water. Figure 1(a) shows an example particle size distribution measured after flushing.
198
The distribution was noisy because concentrations were low. It is clear that a new mode
199
below 100 nm was generated by flushing. Prior to flushing, the toilet chamber was filled
200
with conditioned air from a gas cylinder that was drier than achieved after flushing.
201
Relative humidity (RH) in the toilet bowl chamber rose from ~85% to ~90% after each
202
flush, and the same was true for controls when no flushing occurred. Thus, it does not
203
appear that aerosols went undetected due to evaporation.
204 205
Table 1. Characteristics of aerosols generated per activity or per unit of time by flush
206
toilets and lab-scale models of an aeration basin and converging sewer pipes. type of system
number of aerosols
volume of aerosols
mode of aerosols
produced
produced (mL)
produced (nm)
1.7±0.3 × 106
5.2±1.6 × 10-9
28±3
2.6±1.2 × 106
1.8±1.2 × 10-8
36±16
9.5±1.2 × 106
1.9±0.1 × 10-7
60±5
2.5±0.3 × 105
2.6±0.1 × 10-8
146±16
toilet #1 (per flush) toilet #2 (per flush) aeration basin -1
(min ) converging pipes
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
(min-1) 207 208
The aeration basin produced aerosols at a rate of 9.5 × 106 min-1 and 1.9 × 10-7
209
mL min-1 in terms of total number and volume, respectively. The total number
210
concentration inside the chamber was 275 cm-3 on average, which was about twice that in
211
the toilet chamber (144 cm-3). Figure 1(b) shows an example aerosol size distribution,
212
which was unimodal and centered at 63 nm, indicating that the aeration basin produced
213
larger aerosols than did the toilets.
214
The converging sewer pipes produced aerosols at a rate of 2.5 × 105 min-1 and 2.6
215
× 10-8 mL min-1 in terms of total number and volume, respectively. This rate was 38
216
times lower than produced by the aeration basin in terms of number, and 7 times lower in
217
terms of volume. The example size distribution shown in Figure 1(c) appeared to be
218
trimodal and included a small, broad peak near 1000 nm, or 1 µm. The sewer was the
219
only one among the three wastewater systems to generate these larger aerosols, which
220
help account for the larger difference in volume of aerosols than in number of aerosols
221
generated compared to the aeration basin.
222 223
Figure 1. Examples of aerosol size distributions generated by model wastewater systems:
224
(a) flush toilet; (b) aeration basin; (c) converging sewer pipes. The blue curve represents
225
background particles present before aerosol generation began. The red curve represents
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 29
Page 13 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
226
composite data from SMPS and APS. The black curve represents the fit to the composite
227
data.
228 229
Virus Concentrations. Figure 2 shows the concentrations of MS2 in the chamber
230
air and mixed liquor in the aeration basin and sewer models. The average airborne
231
concentrations of MS2 were 15 and 21 PFU L-1, respectively. Airborne concentrations of
232
MS2 in the aeration basin model were slightly higher than in the sewer model, although
233
this result is contingent upon the size of the experimental chamber: 200 L for the aeration
234
basin and 10 L for the sewer pipes. Over the course of the experiments, which lasted 2-3
235
hours each, the MS2 concentration in the mixed liquor decreased by ~0.1 log10 to an
236
average of 7.3 × 106 PFU mL-1 in the aeration basin model and 8.5 × 106 PFU mL-1 in the
237
sewer model. These decreases are likely to due to physical adsorption and biological
238
inactivation of the virus, as observed in other studies of MS2 in wastewater and sludge. A
239
T90 value (i.e., time to reach 90% inactivation) of 121 hours for MS2 in unpasteurized
240
wastewater at 25 °C has been reported.41
241
Figure 3 shows the concentrations of Phi6 in the chamber air and mixed liquor in
242
the aeration basin and sewer models. Compared to MS2, the airborne concentration of
243
Phi6 was much lower, only ~0.1 PFU L-1 in both models. Furthermore, the concentration
244
of Phi6 decreased substantially in the mixed liquor over the course of the experiment, by
245
0.8 log10 in the aeration basin and 2.6 log10 in the converging sewer pipes model. The
246
Phi6 concentration decreased more rapidly than that of MS2 because Phi6 has a higher
247
adsorption and inactivation rate in wastewater than does MS2.41 Thus, over time,
248
relatively less Phi6 was available for aerosolization. The decrease in Phi6 concentration
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
249
in our sewer model is larger compared to that in earlier studies on the persistence of Phi6
250
in wastewater and the inactivation of Ebola virus in sterilized wastewater.19 The
251
difference may be due to the effect of heat inactivation inside the sump pump used for
252
flow circulation, as Phi6 is believed to be more sensitive to higher temperature.20 The
253
finding that heat inactivation only applies to Phi6 is consistent with the general finding of
254
greater susceptibility of enveloped viruses to inactivation.41
255
Another reason for the difference between MS2 and Phi6 is that the aerosolization
256
efficiencies of MS2 and Phi6 differ. In a separate experiment (described in the
257
Supporting Information), the aerosolization efficiencies of MS2 and Phi6 from a
258
nebulizer were compared. The result indicated that MS2 was aerosolized ~2 times more
259
efficiently compared to Phi6. The difference could be due to the smaller size of MS2
260
(~25 nm vs. ~80 nm) and/or absence of a lipid envelope. How this result applies to
261
aerosolization of Ebola virus from wastewater is not known. Variability in aerosolization
262
efficiencies of different microbes from different media merits further investigation.
263
264
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 29
Page 15 of 29
Environmental Science & Technology
265
Figure 2. MS2 concentrations in air and corresponding mixed liquor from which they
266
were generated in lab-scale models of an aeration basin and converging sewer pipes with
267
MS2 at an initial concentration in mixed liquor of 107 PFU mL-1.
268 269
Figure 3. Phi6 concentrations in air and corresponding mixed liquor from which they
270
were generated in lab-scale models of an aeration basin and converging sewer pipes with
271
Phi6 at an initial concentration in mixed liquor of 107 PFU mL-1.
272 273
Virus Emission Rates. Table 2 presents the emission rates of aerosolized Ebola
274
virus surrogates from the wastewater systems. Airborne MS2 and Phi6 were not detected
275
with toilet flushing. These rates represent averages over the 20-min sampling period. The
276
instantaneous rate would be higher at first and then decrease over time due to inactivation
277
of virus. Differences over time are expected to be relatively small because viral decay
278
over 2-3 hours was