Anion-exchange Studies. XXIII.1,2 Activity Coefficients of Some

May 1, 2002 - Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is the article's first page. Click to increase image size Free first page. View: PDF | PDF w/ Links. ...
0 downloads 0 Views 992KB Size
FREDERICK NELSONAXD KURTA. KRAUS

4154

Vol. 80

[CONTRIDUrION FROM THE OAK RIDGENATIONAL LABORATORY CHEMISTRY DIVISION]

Anion-exchange Studies.

XXIII.lJ Activity Coefficients of Some Electrolytes in the Resin Phase

BY FREDERICK NELSONAND KURTA. KRAUS RECEIVED FEBRUARY 7 , 1958 Ratios F of activity coefficients of a number of electrolytes in the resin (?‘=t(*)) to those in the aqueous phase (Yf) are is remarkably constant but it evaluated from water and electrolyte uptake data. At high concentrations r = ~=t(~),’?’h varies substantially at low concentrations. Activity coefficients of HCl in the resin determined as a function of HCl activity and of cross-linking can be correlated by a concentrated electrolyte model of the exchanger with the assumption that Harned’s rule of the linear variation of !og 7%with composition holds a t constant total molality. Similar considerations, with Harned’s ~ ) HC1rule generalized to higher multi-component systems, permits a t least semi-quantitative evaluation of log Y l t ~ c l (for LiCl mixtures where r H C l is comparatively small. Because of the relatively low activity coefficients of HC1 in the resin phase, separation of HCl from Concentrated halide solutions is possible. The separations are illustrated with several HClLiCl mixtures. Adsorption of sulfuric acid by the sulfate form of the exchanger is discussed and evaluation of the concentration quotient of the acid constant is attempted for the bisulfate ion in the resin phase

I n earlier publications we have endeavored to Activity coefficients in the resin phase may be demonstrate that anion-exchange resins are ex- determined3 from data on electrolyte invasion with tremely useful for separation of metals. However, the relationship as pointed out repeatedly, ion-exchange adsorption aJ = a w (1) data obtained as a function of solution composition where a is the activity of the distributable comnot only permit selection of optimum adsorption and elution conditions for separations, but also ponent J. Subscript (r) denotes the resin phase permit elucidation of equilibria in the aqueous and and no subscript the aqueous phase. Equation 1 implies that the same standard states are selected resin phases. J in the resin and aqueous phases; otherwise a for Such analysis of ion-exchange data requires assumptions or data regarding activity coefficients proportionality constant K would appear in equaof distributable components (or activity coefficient tion l. With our definition of standard states the ratios for ions) for both the resin and aqueous difference in standard free energies is zero and phases. For dilute electrolyte solutions reasonable hence K = 1. If J is an electrolyte with formula M v +X v - , estimates may be made of the activity coefficients where v+ and v- are the number of positive ions y* in the aqueous phase and i t is customary, though not well established, to assume that the (M) and negative ions (X),equation 1 may be writactivity coefficients y ~ (in~the ) resin are constant. ten in the form Actually rather large changes of y i ( r ) have been UJ = m M u + w z X v = W L M ( ~ ) V *V L X ( ~ ) Y - Y Y + . ( ~ ) ( 2 ) reported3v4for dilute electrolyte solutions, though where m is the stoichiometric concentration of the presumably activity coefficient ratios do not vary much in the resin phase as long as invasion of the ions indicated as subscripts, y=t the mean activity coefficients of the components and Y = v+ v-. resin by the supporting electrolyte is small.6 Thus, determination of the stoichiometric concenFor concentrated electrolyte solutions, where most anion-exchange studies of metal complexes trations of the ions in the resin phase as a function have been carried out, reliable assumptions regard- of their concentration in the aqueous phase permits ing activity coefficients in the aqueous phase are computation of the activity coefficient quotient If these are combined with difficult to obtain and further, it is not safe t o as- rJ = y*jr)/y*. known activity coefficients for the aqueous phase sume that for the resin activity coefficients of distributable components and activity coeficient or, equivalently, if the measurements are carried ratios of ions are independent of electrolyte concen- out as a function of the activity of the electrolyte, tration. Thus before anion-exchange measure- computation of y* (r) becomes possible. To ments in concentrated electrolyte solutions can be simplify comparison of the activity coefficients in used with confidence for elucidation of properties the two phases, it is convenient to express concenof the aqueous (or solution) phase, considerably trations in similar units. We have chosen molalimore information regarding the resin phase must be ties for the aqueous phase and moles per kg. of available, particularly information on composition imbibed water for the resin. This method was used by us to determine acof the resin (electrolyte invasion) and on activity tivity coefficients for HCl,3 and by Gottlieb coefficients of the pertinent components. and Gregor4 for determination of y*(r) of various electrolytes in anion exchangers. A number of (1) This document is based o n work performed ior the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission a t the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. authors determined in this manner activity coeffi(3) Previous papers: XXI. K. A. Kraus, G . E. Moore and F. cients of electrolytes in cation exchangersS6 While Nelson, THISJ O U R N A L ,78, 3692 (1956); XXII. K. A. Kraus and F. the general conclusion seems to be that rJ is closc Nelson, hletal Separations by Anion-exchange in Symposium on I o n to unity a t high electrolyte concentrations and COIIExchange and Chromatography in Analytical Chemistry (June 19561, 4nr. Soc. for Testing Materials, Special Technical Publication No. 195. siderably below unity a t low concentrations, de ( 3 ) K. A. Kraus and G. E. Moore, ‘ h t s J O U K N A L . , 75, 1457 (1953). tailed confirmation for other media of interest in yIy

+

(4) M. H. Cottlieb and H. B. Gregor, i b i d . . 76, 4fb39 (1954).

( 5 ) IC. A. Kraus and F . Nelson, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (Genevn, 1935), 7 , 113, 131, United Sations 1956.

( 6 ) See c.g., D. Reichenberg in “Ion Exchangers in Organic and Biochemistry,” C. Calmon and T. R. E. Kressman, editors, Interscience Publishers, Inc., Neiv York, N. Y . , 1037, p. 7 3 .

Aug. 20, 195s

ACTIVITYCOEFFICIENTS OF ELECTROLYTES IN RESIN PHASE

studies of metal complexes was desirable. Further, since a remarkable difference was found in the adsorbabilities of certain metal chloride complexes from HC1 and LiCl ~ o l u t i o n s ,i ~ t ~was ~ of special interest to investigate whether this difference is reflected in the activity coefficients of these electrolytes in the resin phase. Experimental 1. Method.-The

composition of the exchangers in equilibrium with various electrolyte solutions was determined by modification of the method of Pepper, Reichenberg and Hale.* Resin samples (0.2 to 1 9.) in small columns were treated with solutions of known composition. After equilibration the columns were centrifuged to constant weight in a “clinical” centrifuge a t approximately 2000 r.p.m. From the weighings and the weight of “dry” resin the sum of the weights of imbibed water and electrolyte can be determined if a correction is made for the small amount of liquid which adheres to the beads after centrifugation. This correction was assumed t o equal 0.033 liter per liter of bed, the value found earlier for the volume of retained liquid in columns of glass beads of similar mesh sizeaand confirmed in the present study. The amount of electrolyte imbibed by the exchanger was determined by standard analytical or radiometric techniques. In the former, the exchanger, after centrifuging, is washed with sufficient water to remove the imbibed electrolyte which may then be determined. For HC1, H2S04and LiCl we have used acid-base and argentometric titrations. For (NH&SO( the NHI+ ion concentration was determined by first passing the solutions through cation exchangers in the hydrogen form and then titrating the amount of hydrogen ions released. The washed resin beds were frequently centrifuged to check reproducibility of the “water-washed” weights. In general, successive weighings agreed to better than 51%. Through combination of the titrations and weighings a complete stoichiometric description of the resin is possible in terms of moles of electrolyte and kilograms of water per kg. of dry resin. In the radiometric method radioactive tracers are added to the electrolyte solutions and the counting rate per mole of electrolyte established. After equilibration, centrifugation and weighing the resin beds were counted in a well-type scintillation counter to determine the amount of retained electrolyte. This technique greatly simplifies the analytical problem and is adaptable to routine determination of activity coefficients in the resin phase. It is particularly useful for dilute electrolyte solutions where the extent of electrolyte adsorption is small and difficult to establish accurately by more standard analytical techniques. 2. Materials.-Most experiments were carried out with portions of the same batch of quaternary amine polystyrene divinylbenzene exchanger (Dowex-1, cu. loyo D.V.B. 170230 mesh) which has been used in most of our other studies. The capacity was 3.52 moles of sites per kg. of dry chloride form resin which is slightly less than the value found earlier.* While the resins were used in air-dry form, all aeighings, as well as capacities, refer to resin dried to constant weight in a vacuum desiccator a t 60’ over the dehydrating agent “Anhydrone. ” For a few experiments resins of the same type but different cross-linking (1 to 16% D. V. B.) were used. Their capacities were 4.13,4.22,4.01,3.26and 2.65 moles of sites per kg. dry chloride form resin for the 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16% D.V.B. resins, respectively. Some experiments were carried out with a new “high porosity” Dow resin (type 21K) which seems to have properties similar to a low cross-linked exchanger and, according t o the manufacturer, has a network similar to Dowex-1 and the same functional group (trimethylammonium ion). Its capacity was 4.40 moles per kg. dry resin (chloride form). C.P. reagents were used throughout. Concentrated HCl and LiCl stock solutions were passed through anion-exchange beds to purify them from “adsorbable” impurities. The radioactive tracers (h’aa4, Ti/*= 15 hr.; Balas, Ti/, = 8 yr.; (7) K. A. Kraus, F. Nelson. F. B. Clough and R. C. Carlston, THIS JOURNAL, 77, 1391 (1955). (8) K. W. Pepper, D. Reichenberg and D. K. Hale, J . Chem. Soc. (London), 3129 (1952).

4155

Co@, TI/, = 6.2 yr.) were used as obtained from the Radioisotopes Division of ORiVL since according to their analyses they were of satisfactory purity. All measurements were carried out in an airconditioncd room a t 25 f 1 ’.

Results and Discussion 1. Activity Coefficients in the Resin Phase.The main purpose of this study was determination of activity coefficients in the resin phase for electrolytes which are frequently supporting media in anion-exchange studies of metal complexes and the present paper summarizes our results for LiC1, HC1, (NH&S04, H a 0 4 and HCl-LiC1 mixtures. The HC1 data are a recheck a t high concentrations of those reporteda since the present (weight) method is more accurate than the volume method used previously. We shail also report our studies with NaC1, I3aClz and CoClz which were carried out by the tracer method. The results for the various electrolytes, all obtained with the 100,G D.V.B. resin, are summarized in Table I, which lists the analytical data (molality of electrolyte J in the aqueous phase (mJ) and in the resin phase (mJ(r)), anion concentration m x ( r ) in the resin, water content), the activity coefficient ratio r J = ~ * ( ~ ) / yand * the activity coefficients Y * ( ~ ) far the resin phase. The latter were computed from rJwith the values of y* for the aqueous phase summarized by Harned and Owen,Q and Robinson and Stokes.lo It is apparent from examination of Table I that J is surprisingly constant a t high electrolyte concentrations and is not far from unity. Indeed, I’LiCl varies only from ca. 0.7 to 0.8 as PZI,iCl changes from 2 to 20 and y+tr) from 0.7 to 50. The ratio rNaC1 varies from 1 to 1.1 for 0.9 6 mN3cI 6 5.9 but drops off rapidly a t lower concentrations. The ratio r H C ] is considerably lower and lies between 0.5 and 0.6 for m H C l > 2. The values of r(NH,)&04 are also remarkably constant in the molality range 0.8 to 5.8 but are substantially higher than unity (cu. 2). While r H & 0 4 is reasonably constant (cu. 0.4) a t high concentrations it decreases rapidly for mH&O, < 3, presumably because most of the adsorbed HzSO, reacts with the SO4- ions of the exchanger to form HS04ionsll (see also section 5 ) . The values of rCoClr and I’BaCil are almost the same a t low molalities. Near mJ = 2, rBaCil is considerably larger than rCoClo which appears to go through a shallow maximum near m = 1. The decrease in FcocI,is paralleled by intense blue coloration of the exchanger. I n this region adsorption of Co(I1) presumably as negatively charged complexes becomes important. Such adsorption has been demonstrated earlier for Co(I1) in HCl solutions.12 In summary, present results are consistent with those reported earlier for other e l e ~ t r o l y t e s . ~ ~ ~ J j At low imbibed electrolyte concentrations activity coefficients in the resin phase tend to be consider(9) H. S. Harned and B. B. Owen, “The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutionq,” Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York, N. Y.,2nd edition, 1950. (10) R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes, “Electrolyte Solutions,” Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, 1955. (11) (a) K. A. Kraus, F. Nelson and J. F. Baxter, THISJOURNAL, 75, 2768 (1953); (b) R. E. Anderson, W. C. Bauman and D. F. Harrington, Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 1620 (1955). (12) K. A. Kraus and G.E. Moore, TEIS JOURNAL, ‘76, 1460 (1953).

FREDERICK NELSONAND KURT,I.KR.\US

4 156

ably lower than in the aqueous phase for reasons which are still obscure. At high concentrations, and over a wide concentration range, activity coefficients in the resin of “strong” electrolytes do not differ markedly from those in the aqueous phase which further supports the now widely accepted ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS OF S O M E ELECTROLYTES 1% T H E RESINPHASE( DOWEX-1X IO) kgaio/ 717

0

2.07 4.10 6.03 8.03 9.82

1.09 3.03

17.4 18.5 19 8

2.13 4.45 t i . HI1 ! I . tis

12.5 14.6 16.0

,5.15 7.46 8.63 11.9 17.1

18.2 2ii (1

,Oll:L? 0061 .iil87 ,114

,25 .9l .i U! i

5117 2.ii2

0

(1

,

I). 12

111;

1;

2 ;-drocliloricacitl 1 .94 8 . 6 1 0.52.5 0.52 ,i 18 . 12.2 ,502 j6 8 ,t511 16 8 ,483 60 12.3 3 1 0 . &67 .62 16.8 25.2 ,419 .61 ,410 .A1 20.0 28 6 23.2 :j2 -I. 37?l .j 8

0.ii021

2.24

kgrm

A . Lithium chloride 6.40 0.