Antineoplastic Agents. 487. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the

Evaluation in the Cytotoxicity and Phenotypic Sea Urchin Embryo Assays .... Keith A. Monk , Jean-Charles Chapuis , George R. Pettit , David J. Cha...
0 downloads 0 Views 104KB Size
Download PDF
J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 525-531

525

Antineoplastic Agents. 487. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the Antineoplastic Agent 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-amino-Z-stilbene and Derived Amino Acid Amides George R. Pettit,*,† Collin R. Anderson,† Delbert L. Herald,† M. Katherine Jung,‡ Debbie J. Lee,§ Ernest Hamel,§ and Robin K. Pettit† Cancer Research Institute and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872404, Tempe, Arizona 85287-2404, Science Applications International Corp.sFrederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, and Screening Technologies Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201 Received May 13, 2002

An efficient synthesis of 3,4-methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-amino-Z-stilbene (1c) and hydrochloride (1d) is reported. The nitrostilbene intermediate 6a was obtained via a Wittig reaction using phosphonium salt 4 and 3-nitro-4-methoxybenzaldehyde 5. A one-step reduction using zinc in acetic acid produced the synthetic objective amine 1c. The coupling of this amine with various Fmoc amino acids, followed by cleavage of the R-amine protecting group, resulted in a series of new cancer cell growth inhibitory amides. Amine 1c, hydrochloride 1d, glycine amide 3b, and tyrosine amide 3f had the highest level (GI50 ) 10-2-10-3 µg/mL) of activity against a panel of six human and one animal (P388) cancer cell lines. Amine 1c and its hydrochloride 1d potently inhibited tubulin polymerization by binding at the colchicine site, while the amides had little activity against purified tubulin. Nevertheless, most of the amides caused a marked increase in the mitotic index of treated cells, indicating that tubulin was their intracellular target. Introduction Combretastatin A-2 (1a, Chart 1) represents one of the key antineoplastic and cancer vascular targeting stilbenes,1,2 designated combretastatins A-1 to A-6, that we isolated from the South African bush willow tree Combretum caffrum.3 Initially we selected combretastatin A-4 (2a) for preclinical development, based on a spectrum of promising biological properties that were greatly enhanced by a structural modification to sodium combretastatin A-4 phosphate prodrug (2b, CA4P).4,5 For example, 2b caused a 100-fold decrease in tumor blood flow to the P22 carcinosarcoma in the rat while causing no significant blood flow reduction in normal heart, kidney, and small intestine.6 Other recent preclinical findings include the antivascular and antitumor effects produced by 2b against non-small-cell lung cancer in vivo.7 Most importantly, the initial phase 1 human cancer clinical trials of 2b have been quite successful.8-10 Our discovery of combretastatin A-411 has prompted the synthesis of many structural variations.12-14 One important variant replaces the 3′-hydroxyl of the B ring with an amine (2c), which subsequently resulted in a water-soluble hydrochloride salt (2d) given the code name AC-7739.15 In 1999, Ohsumi et al. published interesting amino acid amide derivatives of 2c that showed anticancer activity against murine colon 26 * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: 480-9653351. Fax: 480-965-8558. E-mail: [email protected]. † Arizona State University. ‡ Science Applications International Corp.sFrederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick. § Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at Frederick.

adenocarcinoma cells.16 Both 2d and a serine derivative 2e, code name AC7700, have undergone further evaluation.17,18 We have extended the early study of the combretastatin A-4 3′-amino derivative to combretastatin A-2 and now report the synthesis of 2,3-methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-amino-Z-stilbene (1c) and a selection of amino acid amide derivatives (3a-g) for purposes of an SAR investigation directed at locating promising candidate(s) for preclinical development. Results and Discussion Chemistry. The key precursor 3,4-methylenedioxy5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-nitro-Z-stilbene (6a) was obtained (4 f 6) by employing a Wittig reaction sequence (Scheme 1). The required cis-stilbene was obtained in a Z to E ratio of 1.4:1. Photochemical isomerization3,19 converted the trans-stilbene to the cis-stilbene isomer in 62% yield. Reduction of nitrostilbene 6a with zinc in acetic acid15 afforded amine 1c. Following its purification by column chromatography, the 3,4-methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-amino-Z-stilbene crystallized (1:9 ethyl acetate/hexane) and was subjected to X-ray crystal structure determination. Treatment of amine 1c, in ethyl acetate, with 1 N HCl in diethyl ether yielded the amine hydrochloride (1d). Interestingly, this hydrochloride derivative was found to be essentially insoluble in water. Conversion of amine 1c to a selection of Fmoc-amino acid amides was readily accomplished using PyBroP as the coupling reagent (Scheme 2).20 All Fmoc deprotection was performed using tris(2-aminoethyl)amine.21 The acid-sensitive side chain protecting groups on Cys, Ser, Trp, and Tyr were removed with trifluoroactic acid in dichloromethane.

10.1021/jm020204l CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society Published on Web 01/10/2003

526

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4

Chart 1

The trityl group on Cys was deprotected in the presence of the triethylsilane. Biological Evaluation. The cancer cell growth inhibitory activities of the protected amides and related

Pettit et al.

compounds are summarized in Table 1. Amine 1c was more active than the 3′-alcohol combretastatin A-2.3 This result mirrors combretastatin A-4 published data reporting increased activity of amine 2c (IC50 ) 5.1 nM) over phenol 2a (IC50 ) 18.0 nM) in a murine colon 26 adenocarcinoma cell study.15 Although Oshumi et al. reported the serine derivative 2e of amine 2c to be the most active among their amino acid derivatives of combretastatin A-4,16 we found that our serine derivative 3d displayed only marginal activity. Against the minipanel of cancer cell lines listed in Table 1, amine 1c, hydrochloride salt 1d, glycine amide 3b, and tyrosine amide 3f provided the strongest cancer cell line growth inhibition, while the remaining amides were 1.5to 10-fold less active. Because of the well-documented interactions of combretastatins A-2 (1a) and A-4 (2a) with tubulin, the newly synthesized analogues (1c,d, 3a-g, 6a,b, and 7a-g) were examined for their effects on both tubulin assembly and the binding of [3H]colchicine to tubulin in comparison with the two natural products. Only amine 1c and its hydrochloride salt 1d had significant, and essentially identical, effects in either reaction (Table 2; only data for the more cytotoxic amides are shown here; colchicine binding studies with 6a,b and 7a,c-g were performed with the compounds at 100 µM). Consistent with their overall cytotoxicity, the effects of 1c and 1d on the tubulin-based reactions were between those of the more potent combretastatin A-4 and the less potent combretastatin A-2. Because the cytotoxic activities of the amides 3a-g in the human tumor cell lines and of 7b in the murine P388 line were overall not that different from the activities of 1c and 1d in these lines, we wondered whether another cellular target might be involved in their activity. As a preliminary approach to this question, we evaluated these amides, the parent compounds 1c and 1d, and the combretastatins for their effects on the mitotic index of MCF-7 cells. An increase in the mitotic index generally represents an effect at the tubulin level. As shown in Table 2, like the combretastatins (1a, 2a) and the amine (1c) and its salt (1d), the amides 3a-g and 7b caused a marked rise in the

Scheme 1a

a Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, THF, Ar, 0 °C; (b) 3-nitro-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (5) in THF, Ar; (c) benzil, benzene, 254 nm lamp, Ar; (d) zinc, acetic acid; (e) 1 M HCl in diethyl ether, ethyl acetate.

Antineoplastic Agents

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4 527

Table 1. Human Cancer Cell Line GI50 (µg/mL) and Murine P388 Lymphocytic Leukemia Cell Line Inhibitory Activity ED50 (µg/mL) of the 3′-Substituted Stilbenes compound

leukemia P388

pancreas BXPC-3

breast MCF-7

CNS SF-295

lung NSC NCI-H460

colon KM2OL2

prostate DU145

6a 6b 1a 1b 1c 1d 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g

0.227 >10.0 0.016 0.0250 0.00189 0.0388 0.332 0.0199 0.0585 0.172 0.0653 0.0475 0.306

0.38 >10.0 0.014 2.1 0.0071 0.075 0.20 0.025 0.20 0.027 0.044 0.0067 0.012

0.36 >10.0 0.0042 0.045 0.0047 0.0042 0.050 0.014 0.044 0.017 0.035 0.035 0.037

0.33 4.6 0.0083 0.042 0.023 0.0082 0.037 0.059 1.7 0.049 0.042 0.0097 0.055

0.35 >10.0 0.043 0.41 0.0050 0.0057 0.032 0.0042 0.044 0.042 0.053 0.012 0.064

0.45 >10.0 0.47 3.8 0.022 0.035 0.055 0.012 0.034 0.019 0.018 0.022 0.019

0.64 >10.0 0.0054 0.053 0.028 0.0082 0.0046 0.0028 0.040 0.014 0.040 0.018 0.036

mean 0.39 0.080 0.93 0.013 0.025 0.10 0.020 0.30 0.49 0.042 0.017 0.076

Table 2. Effects of Combretastatin A-2 Derivatives on Tubulin and on Mitosis in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells inhibition of colchicine bindingb (% inhibition)

compound

inhibition of tubulin assemblya (IC50 ( SD, µM)

2 µM inhibitor concentration

5 µM inhibitor concentration

combretastatin A-4 combretastatin A-2 1c 1d 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g 7b

2.1 ( 0.1 4.0 ( 0.2 3.1 ( 0.05 2.9 ( 0.05 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40

96 79 84 87

98 92 94 95

20 µM inhibitor concentration

31 22

100 µM inhibitor concentration

mitotic indexc (% mitotic cells ( SD)

15 66 16 64 16 19 14 8

57 ( 6 57 ( 4 48 ( 5 47 ( 6 42 ( 4 52 ( 7 52 ( 4 35 ( 7 57 ( 12 44 ( 1 48 ( 1 56 ( 11

a Reaction mixtures contained 10 µM tubulin (1.0 mg/mL) and varying drug concentrations. A drug/tubulin preincubation in the absence of GTP preceded the assembly reaction.24 b Reaction mixtures contained tubulin at 1.0 µM, [3H]colchicine at 5.0 µM, and the inhibitory compounds at the indicated concentrations.24 c MCF-7 cells were treated for 12 h with 10 times the GI50 concentrations shown in Table 2 except that the concentrations of combretastatins A-4 and A-2 and of 7b were 50 nM, 1.0 µM, and 1.0 µM, respectively. Cells with condensed chromosomes were quantitated as mitotic cells. The mitotic index in untreated cells was 3.6%. See text for further details.

Scheme 2a

mitotic index of the MCF-7 cells (data shown for drug treatment for 12 h). The values obtained ranged from 35% to 57% mitotic cells, defined as those displaying condensed chromosomes, compared with 4% in untreated cultures. This suggests either that there is a markedly enhanced uptake of these amides by the cell or that the amides are reconverted to 1c by an extracellular or intracellular amidase. All of the new substances were screened against the bacteria Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and the fungi Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans according to established broth microdilution susceptibility assays.22,23 In broth microdilution assays, glycine amide 3b exhibited the broadest antimicrobial spectrum, targeting pathogenic yeasts and bacteria. Conclusions

a Reagents and conditions: (a) Fmoc-amino acid, PyBrOP, DIPEA, Ar; (b) TAEA, DCM; (c) TFA, DCM; (d) TFA, triethylsilane, DCM.

Present evidence indicates that the 3′-amino counterpart (1c) of combretastatin A-2 and derived glycine amide (3b) and tyrosine amide (3f) correspond to new stilbenes with a very high level of inhibition against a minipanel of cancer cell lines. The potential here was further supported by the potent inhibition of tubulin polymerization exhibited by amine 1c. Selected members of the corresponding amides (3a-g), such as 3b and 3f, are being further developed.

528

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4

Experimental Section Materials and Methods. Ether refers to diethyl ether and Ar to argon gas. All solvents were redistilled, and 3-nitro-4methoxybenzaldehyde was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Bromo-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate (PyBroP), O-Boc-NR-Fmoc-L-tryptophan, O-tertbutyl-NR-Fmoc-L-tyrosine, NR-Fmoc-glycine, and S-trityl-NRFmoc-L-cysteine were obtained from Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corporation (San Diego, CA). Acetic acid, N-butyllithium (2.5 M solution in hexanes), diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), triethylsilane (TES), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were obtained from Acros Organics (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI). Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography using Analtech silica gel GHLF uniplates visualized under long-wave and short-wave UV irradiation. Solvent extracts of aqueous solutions were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Where appropriate, the crude products were separated by column chromatography, flash (230-400 mesh ASTM) or gravity (70-230 mesh ASTM) silica from E. Merck. Melting points are uncorrected and were determined on an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus. Optical rotations were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter. The [R]D values are given in 10-1 deg cm2 g-1. The IR spectra were obtained using a Mattson Instruments 2020 Galaxy series FT-IR. The 1 H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded employing Varian Gemini 300, Varian Unity 400, and Varian Unity 500 instruments using a deuterated solvent and were referenced either to TMS or the solvent. HRMS data were recorded with a JEOL LCmate mass spectrometer. Elemental analyses were determined by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc., Knoxville, TN. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-nitrostilbene, Z and E Isomers (6a and 6b). The phosphonium bromide 4 (20.1 g, 39.6 mmol) was placed in a flame-dried flask under Ar and suspended in THF (300 mL). After being stirred for 45 min at room temperature, the solution was cooled to 0 °C and n-butyllithium (15.9 mL, 39.8 mmol) was added. This resulted in the reaction mixture turning deep-red. Stirring continued for 4 h at room temperature. 3-Nitro-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (5, 7.20 g, 3.97 mmol) was dissolved in THF (100 mL), and the solution was added dropwise to the reacting mixture via an addition funnel. The solution turned from deep-red to yellow-green. After being stirred 18 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C. The reaction was terminated with ethyl acetate, and the solution was filtered and concentrated under vacuum to yield a dark-green oil. The product was separated by gravity column chromatography on silica gel (4:1 hexane/ ethyl acetate) and recrystallized (hexane/acetone) to yield the Z-stilbene 6a (4.09 g, 31%) as a yellow-green solid: mp 109110 °C; Rf ) 0.29 (4:1 hexane/ethyl acetate); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.78 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.94 (3H, s, OCH3), 5.96 (2H, s, -CH2-), 6.41 (3H, m, vinyl H, 2 × ArH), 6.54 (1H, d, J ) 12.4 Hz, vinyl H), 6.94 (1H, d, J ) 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.42 (1H, dd, J ) 8.8, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.76 (1H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, ArH); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.7, 148.9, 143.6, 139.6, 134.9, 134.5, 131.1, 130.7, 129.7, 126.6, 126.0, 113.2, 108.5, 102.8, 101.5, 56.5, 56.5; HRMS calcd for C17H16NO6 [M + H]+ 330.0978, found 330.0947. Anal. (C17H15NO6) C, H, N. The E-stilbene 6b was isolated from the aforementioned column and recrystallized (hexane/acetone) as an orange solid (2.90 g, 22%): mp 165.5-167 °C; Rf ) 0.18 (4:1 hexane/ethyl acetate); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.92 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.94 (3H, s, OCH3), 5.97 (2H, s, -CH2-), 6.62 (1H, s, ArH), 6.70 (1H, s, ArH), 6.81 (1H, d, J ) 16 Hz, vinyl H), 6.90 (1H, d, J ) 16 Hz, vinyl H), 7.03 (1H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz, ArH), 7.58 (1H, dd, J ) 9.0, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.92 (1H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, ArH); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 149.3, 143.6, 139.7, 135.4, 131.7, 131.6, 130.3, 129.2, 124.4, 122.9, 113.7, 107.1, 101.6, 99.8, 56.6, 56.6; HRMS calcd for C17H16NO6 [M + H]+ 330.0978, found 330.0869. Anal. (C17H15NO6) C, H, N. Photochemical Isomerization of E-Stilbene 6b to ZStilbene (6a). To a stirred solution of the E-stilbene 6b (2.9 g, 8.8 mmol) in benzene (550 mL) was added benzil (9.5 g, 45

Pettit et al. mmol, 5.1 equiv). After flushing the reaction flask with Ar, the reaction mixture was stirred overnight. The mixture was then irradiated with a 254 nm UV lamp for 5 h. Upon removal of the benzene in vacuo, the product was separated by gravity column chromatography (4:1 hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford unreacted starting material 6b (0.92 g, 32%) and the desired Z-stilbene 6a (1.8 g, 62%). 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-amino-Z-stilbene (1c). To a stirred solution of nitrostilbene 6a (1.4 g, 4.3 mmol) in acetic acid (350 mL) was added zinc dust (60 g, 93% coverage of the total reflections possible to a resolution of 0.83 Å. A total of 7211 reflections were harvested from the total data collection, and final cell constants were calculated from a set of 332 strong, unique reflections from these data. Subsequent statistical analysis of the complete reflection data set using the XPREP25 program indicated that the space group was P21. Crystal data for C17H17N1O4: a ) 11.5714(3) Å, b ) 5.3425(2) Å, c ) 12.5632(3) Å, β ) 105.605(1)°, V ) 748.03(4) Å3, λ(Cu KR) ) 1.541 78 Å, µ(Cu KR) ) 0.783 mm-1, Pc ) 1.329 g cm-3 for Z ) 2 and Mr ) 299.32, F(000) ) 316. After data reduction and merging of equivalent reflections and rejection of systematic absences, 2310 unique observed reflections remained (Rint ) 0.1867) and these were used in the subsequent structure solution and refinement. An absorption correction was applied to the data with SADBS.26 Direct methods structure determination and refinement were accomplished with the SHELXTL NT, version V5.1025 suite of programs. All non-hydrogen atoms for amine 1c were located using the default settings of that program. Hydrogen atom coordinates were calculated at optimum positions and forced to ride the atom to which they were attached. Anisotropic refinement of the model shown in Figure 1 resulted in a final residual value of 0.0778 for the observed data (0.0878 for all data). The difference Fourier map showed insignificant residual electron density, the largest difference peak and hole being +0.324 and -0.286 e/Å3, respectively. Final bond distances and angles were all within acceptable limits. Unless otherwise noted, the following general procedure was employed for synthesis of the Fmoc-protected amino acid amides of amine 1c.

Antineoplastic Agents

Figure 1. ORTEP molecular structure of amine (1c) with the numbering scheme and thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(S-Trt-Nr-Fmoc(7a). To a stirred mixture of amine 1c (57 mg, 0.19 mmol), S-Trt-NR-Fmoc-L-Cys (0.15 g, 0.26 mmol, 1.4 equiv), and PyBroP (127 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1.4 equiv) in DCM (1 mL) at 0 °C under Ar was added DIPEA (0.075 mL, 0.43 mmol, 2.3 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Ethyl acetate was added, and the solvents were removed in vacuo, leaving a white foam. The product was obtained by flash column chromatography (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate) as a white foam 7a (0.14 g, 85%): Rf ) 0.81 (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate); [R]22D -11.5° (c 0.87, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.71 (1H, m), 2.80 (1H, m), 3.71 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.72 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.93 (1H, m), 4.21 (1H, t, J ) 7.0 Hz, Fmoc), 4.38 (2H, d, J ) 7.0, Fmoc), 5.88 (2H, s, -CH2-), 6.39 (1H, d, J ) 12.0 Hz, vinyl H), 6.44 (1H, s, ArH), 6.44 (1H, d, J ) 12.5 Hz, vinyl H), 6.47 (1H, s, ArH), 6.66 (1H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz, ArH), 6.98 (1H, dd, J ) 8.0, 1.5 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (2H, m, Fmoc), 7.36 (2H, m, Fmoc), 7.58 (2H, d, J ) 6.5 Hz, Fmoc), 7.74 (2H, m, Fmoc), 8.23 (1H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, ArH); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.8, 155.8, 148.5, 147.1, 147.1, 144.3, 143.7, 143.6, 143.3, 141.3, 134.3, 131.8, 130.0, 129.5, 129.3, 129.0, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 127.1, 126.9, 125.0, 124.6, 120.8, 120.7, 120.0, 120.0, 109.6, 108.4, 103.0, 101.3, 67.4, 67.1, 56.3, 55.7, 53.4, 47.1, 33.9. Anal. (C54H46N2O7S) C, H, N. Synthesis of 3′-L-Cys-amide-Z-stilbene 3a provides the general procedure (except for use of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and triethylsilane (TES) with Cys Trt cleavage) for cleavage of the Fmoc-amino acid protecting group 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Cys)amido-Zstilbene (3a). To a stirred solution of 3′-L-Cys-amido-Zstilbene (7a, 42 mg, 0.048 mmol) in DCM (1 mL) was added TES (0.5 mL) and TFA (1.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min, and the solution was concentrated under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in DCM (1 mL), and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (TAEA, 0.5 mL) was added. Fifteen minutes later, DCM (10 mL) was added and the mixture was washed with brine (10 mL). The organic solvent was removed in vacuo to yield an oil that was subjected to gravity column chromatography (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate followed by 9:1 DCM/ CH3OH). Product 3a was obtained as a colorless foam (5.0 mg, 26%): Rf ) 0.87 (9:1 DCM/CH3OH); [R]28D -97.3° (c 0.44, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.90 (1H, m), 3.36 (1H, m), 3.72 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.83 (1H, m), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 5.91 (2H, s, -CH2-), 6.38 (1H, d, J ) 12.3 Hz, vinyl H), 6.45 (1H, s, ArH), 6.47 (1H, s, ArH), 6.48 (1H, d, J ) 12.6 Hz, vinyl H), 6.72 (1H, d, J ) 8.7 Hz, ArH), 6.98 (1H, dd, J ) 8.7, 1.8 Hz, L-Cys)amido-Z-stilbene

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4 529 ArH), 8.33 (1H, d, J ) 1.5 Hz, ArH), 9.90 (1H, s); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.9, 148.5, 147.6, 143.3, 134.2, 131.9, 130.0, 129.4, 128.8, 127.1, 124.3, 120.4, 109.7, 108.4, 103.0, 101.3, 56.5, 56.3, 55.8, 38.2. Anal. (C20H22N2O5S) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(Nr-Fmoc-L-Gly)amido-Z-stilbene (7b). Following the general procedure, to NR-Fmoc-Gly (82 mg, 0.28 mmol, 1.9 equiv) in DCM (1 mL) at 0 °C under Ar was added DIPEA (0.075 mL, 0.43 mmol, 2.9 equiv). Next, PyBroP (0.123 g, 0.26 mmol, 1.8 equiv) and amine 1c (44 mg, 0.15 mmol) were added. The product was crystallized from hexanes/ethyl acetate (75 mg, 88%): mp 67-69 °C (dec); Rf ) 0.40 (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate). Anal. (C34H30N2O7) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Gly)amido-Zstilbene (3b). Following the general procedure, amide 7b (75 mg, 0.13 mmol) in chloroform (6 mL) was treated with TAEA (0.4 mL, 2.7 mmol, 21 equiv). After the reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min, additional TAEA (0.4 mL, 2.7 mmol, 21 equiv) was added. The product was obtained as a colorless oil 3b (38 mg, 83%): Rf ) 0.38 (9:1 DCM/CH3OH); HRMS calcd for C19H21N2O5 [M + H]+ 357.1450, found 357.1489. Anal. (C19H20N2O5‚0.5H2O) C, H. N: calcd 7.67; found 8.19. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(Nr-Fmoc-L-Phe)amido-Z-stilbene (7c). Amine 1c (0.16 g, 0.53 mmol) was mixed with NR-Fmoc-Phe (0.31 g, 0.80 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in DCM (3 mL), DIPEA (0.23 mL, 1.3 mmol, 2.5 equiv), and PyBroP (0.36 g, 0.77 mmol, 1.5 equiv). After 40 min, a white precipitate was collected and recrystallized from DCM/ethyl acetate to afford the product as a colorless solid (7c, 270 mg, 75%): mp 85-87 °C; Rf ) 0.42 (2:1 hexane/ethyl acetate); [R]25D -29.4° (c 1.00, CHCl3). Anal. (C41H36N2O7‚0.5H2O) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Phe)amido-Zstilbene (3c). Cleavage of amide 7c (0.12 g, 0.18 mmol) was achieved in chloroform (3 mL) and TAEA (0.60 mL, 4.0 mmol, 22 equiv). After 20 min, DCM (12 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and the solvent was successively washed with brine (4 mL) and phosphate buffer (pH 5.5, 2 × 6 mL). The organic phase was concentrated under vacuum, and the residue was subjected to gravity column chromatography (1:1 hexane/DCM followed by 95:5 DCM/CH3OH) to yield a colorless oil 3c (74 mg, 94%): Rf ) 0.76 (95:5 DCM/CH3OH); [R]25 -67.0° (c 1.00, CHCl3). Anal. (C26H26N2O5) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(O-But-Nr-FmocL-Ser)amido-Z-stilbene (7d). To a stirred mixture of 1c (0.13 g, 0.43 mmol) and O-But-NR-Fmoc-Ser (0.25 g, 0.66 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in DCM (2 mL) at 0 °C under Ar was added DIPEA (0.180 mL, 1.0 mml, 2.3 equiv) followed by PyBroP (0.29 g, 0.63 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. It was then washed with aqueous citric acid (10% by weight), dried with magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under vacuum. DCM and ethyl acetate were added to the residue, and the resulting off-white precipitate was collected. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to gravity column chromatography (1:1, DCM/ethyl acetate) to yield a pale-yellow oil. The product was precipitated from hexanes/ethyl acetate to afford a colorless powder 7d (0.21 g, 73%): mp 107.5-109.5 °C; Rf ) 0.80 (1:1 DCM/ethyl acetate); [R]24D -3.4° (c 1.01, CHCl3). Anal. (C39H40N2O8) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Ser)amido-Zstilbene (3d). To a stirred solution of 7d (110 mg, 0.16 mmol) in DCM (1 mL) at 0 °C under Ar was added trifluoracetic acid (1 mL). The mixture immediately turned magenta. After being stirred for 1 h, the solution was concentrated under vacuum. The residue was taken up in DCM (2 mL). TAEA (1 mL) was added, and stirring continued for 10 min. DCM (15 mL) was added, and the solution was washed successively with brine (6 mL) and phosphate buffer (pH 5.5, 15 mL). After backextracting the phosphate buffer with DCM, the organic extracts were concentrated under vacuum and subjected to gravity column chromatography (1:1 DCM/ethyl acetate followed by 95:5 DCM/CH3OH) to afford an oil 3d (25 mg, 41%): Rf ) 0.33 (95:5 DCM/CH3OH); [R]26D -8.6° (c 0.70, CHCl3). Anal. (C20H22N2O6‚0.5H2O) C, H, N.

530

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4

3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(N-Boc-Nr-Fmoc(7e). Following the general method, amine 1c (51 mg, 0.17 mmol), NR-Fmoc-Trp(Boc) (0.13 g, 0.25 mmol, 1.5 equiv), PyBroP (0.12 g, 0.26 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in DCM (1 mL), and DIPEA (0.075 mL, 0.43 mmol, 2.5 equiv) were used to obtain amide 7e as a colorless solid (0.13 g, 93%, reprecipitated from hexanes/ethyl acetate): mp 118-120 °C; Rf ) 0.71 (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate); [R]22D -22.8° (c 0.65, CHCl3). Anal. (C48H45N3O9) N. C, H: calcd 71.36, 5.61; found 71.84, 6.03. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Trp)amido-Zstilbene (3e). Amide 7e (90 mg, 0.11 mmol), DCM (0.2 mL), and TFA (1.8 mL) were mixed and stirred for 1 h at 0 °C and then condensed in vacuo. By use of the general Fmoc deprotection procedure, the residue was taken up in DCM (2 mL), heated with TAEA (1 mL), and stirred for 20 min to yield an oil (3e, 11 mg, 20%): Rf ) 0.31 (8:1 DCM/ethyl acetate); [R]29D -87.5° (c 0.44, CHCl3); HRMS calcd for C28H28N3O5 [M + H]+ 486.2029, found 486.2008. Anal. (C28H27N3O5‚H2O) H, N. C: calcd 66.79; found 66.31. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(O-But-Nr-FmocL-Tyr)amido-Z-stilbene (7f). Amine 1c (0.13 g, 0.43 mmol), O-But-NR-Fmoc-Tyr (0.29 g, 0.63 mmol, 1.5 equiv), DCM (2 mL), DIPEA (0.180 mL, 1.0 mmol, 2.3 equiv), and PyBroP (0.29 g, 0.63 mmol, 1.5 equiv) were mixed to yield stilbene 7f. The product was isolated by gravity column chromatography (1:1 DCM/ethyl acetate) as a slightly yellow oil. Stilbene 7f was then precipitated from hexanes/ethyl acetate as a colorless powder (7f, 0.29 g, 91%): mp 95-97 °C; Rf ) 0.78 (1:1 DCM/ ethyl acetate); [R]24D -9.2° (c 1.15, CHCl3). Anal. (C45H44N2O8) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Tyr)amido-Zstilbene (3f). To a stirred solution of 7f (0.63 g, 0.85 mmol) in DCM (4 mL) was added TFA (4 mL). The mixture was stirred for 20 min. Solvent was removed under vacuum, and the mixture was subjected to gravity column chromatography (4:1 DCM/ethyl acetate). The phenol obtained was dissolved in DCM (4.5 mL) to which TAEA (2.7 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred for 20 min, washed with brine, and dried with magnesium sulfate. Solvent was removed under vacuum, and the product was purified by gravity column chromatography (4:1 DCM/ethyl acetate followed by 9:1 DCM/CH3OH). The product was obtained as a colorless oil (3f, 0.35 g, 90%): Rf ) 0.65 (9:1 DCM/CH3OH); [R]24D -94.9° (c 1.02, CH2Cl2). Anal. (C26H26N2O6‚H2O) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(Nr-Fmoc-L-Val)amido-Z-stilbene (7g). To a stirred mixture of amine 1c (49 mg, 0.16 mmol), NR-Fmoc-Val (93 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1.7 equiv), and PyBroP (114 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in DCM (1 mL at 0 °C under Ar) was added DIPEA (0.075 mL, 0.43 mmol, 2.6 equiv). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature, and the solvent was removed under vacuum to yield an oil. The product was precipitated from ether and collected as a colorless solid 7g (93 mg, 91%): mp 203-204.5 °C; Rf ) 0.28 (2:1 n-hexane/ethyl acetate); [R]23 -36.6° (c 1.01, CHCl3). Anal. (C37H36N2O7‚H2O) C, H, N. 3,4-Methylenedioxy-5,4′-dimethoxy-3′-(L-Val)amido-Zstilbene (3g). Following the general method, amide 7g (93 mg, 0.15 mmol) in DCM (5 mL) and TAEA (0.75 mL, 5.0 mmol, 33 equiv) were mixed to yield an oil, which was subjected to gravity column chromatography (4:1 DCM/ethyl acetate). The product was obtained as a colorless oil (3g, 59 mg, 98%): Rf ) 0.26 (4:1 DCM/ethyl acetate); [R]25 -39.5° (c 0.43, CHCl3). Anal. (C22H26N2O5‚0.5 H2O) C, H, N. Assays for evaluation of tubulin polymerization and the binding of [3H]colchicine to tubulin were performed as described previously.24 The mitotic index of drug-treated MCF-7 cells was obtained by examining cells grown on Lab-Tek II chamber slides obtained from Nalge Nunc International. The cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM glutamine. Cells were seeded at 5000/chamber the day before exposure to drugs and grown an additional 12 h (final dimethyl sulfoxide concentration, 1%). The cells were fixed in a solution L-Trp)amido-Z-stilbene

Pettit et al. containing 8% formaldehyde, 50 mM 1,4-piperazineethanesulfonate (pH 6.9 with NaOH), 5 mM MgC12, and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide for 45 min. The slide was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and the DNA was fluorescently labeled with 2.5 µM 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Coverslips were mounted on the Citifluor AF1 antifade agent obtained from Marivac, Ltd. The slides were examined with a Nikon E800 epifluorescence microscope equipped with an appropriate filter, and cells with condensed chromosomes were quantitated.

Acknowledgment. We are pleased to thank the following for financial assistance: Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, DHHS, for awarding an Outstanding Investigator Grant CA44344-05-12; the Arizona Disease Control Research Commission; the Caitlin Robb Foundation; Diane Cummings Halle; Rod J. and Hazel V. McMullin; Gary L. and Diane Tooker; Lottie Flugel; Polly J. Trautman; John and Edit Reyno; Dr. John C. Budzinski; the Ladies Auxiliary to the Veterans of Foreign Wars; and the Robert B. Dalton Endowment Fund. In addition, we thank Dr. Gerald Boland for conducting some preliminary experiments. Other very helpful assistance was provided by Drs. Fiona Hogan, John C. Knight, Jean M. Schmidt, JeanCharles Chapuis, Ms. Bridget Fakoury, and Mr. Michael J. Dodson. This work was supported in part by NCI, National Institutes of Health Contract NO1-CO-1240. Supporting Information Available: X-ray supporting material for amine 1c, murine P388 lymphocytic leukemia cell line ED50 (µg/mL) evaluation of NR-Fmoc-amino acid amides 7a-g, and antimicrobial activities of protected amides and related compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References (1) Lin, C. M.; Singh, S. B.; Chu, P. S.; Dempcy, R. O.; Schmidt, J. M.; Pettit, G. R.; Hamel, E. Interactions of tubulin with potent natural and synthetic analogs of the antimitotic agent combretastatin: a structure-activity study. Mol. Pharmacol. 1988, 34, 200-208. (2) Lin, C. M.; Ho, H. H.; Pettit, G. R. Antimitotic natural products combretastatin A-4 and combretastatin A-2: studies on the mechanism of their inhibition of the binding of colchicine to tubulin. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 6984-6991. (3) Pettit, G. R.; Singh, S. B. Isolation, structure, and synthesis of combretastatin A-2, A-3, and B-2. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 23902396. (4) Pettit, G. R.; Temple, C., Jr.; Narayanan, V. L.; Varma, R.; Simpson, M. J.; Boyd, M. R.; Rener, G. A.; Bansal, N. Antineoplastic agents 322. Synthesis of combretastatin A-4 prodrugs. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1995, 10, 299-309. (5) Pettit, G. R.; Rhodes, M. R. Antineoplastic agents 389. New Synthesis of combretastatin A-4 prodrug. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1998, 13, 183-191. (6) Galbraith, S. M.; Chaplin, D. J.; Lee, F.; Stratford, M. R. I.; Locke, R. J.; Vojnovic, B.; Tozer, G. M. Effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate on endothelial cell morphology in vitro and relationship to tumour vascular targeting activity in vivo. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 93-102. (7) Boehle, A. S.; Sipos, B.; Kliche, U.; Kalthoff, H.; Dohrmann, P. Combretastatin A-4 prodrug inhibits growth of human non-small cell lung cancer in a murine xenotransplant model. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001, 71, 1657-1665. (8) Remick, S. C.; Dowlati, A.; Robertson, K.; Spiro, T.; Connell, C.; Levitan, N.; Stratford, M. Phase I pharmacokinetics study of single dose intravenous (IV) combretastatin A-4 prodrug (CA4P) in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. In Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics Discovery, Development, and Clinical Validation, Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Congress, Washington, DC, 1999; No. 16, p 4. (9) Rustin, G. J. S.; Galtraith, S. M.; Taylor, N. J.; Maxwell, R.; Tozer, G.; Baddeley, H.; Wilson, I.; Prose, V. Combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P) selectively targets vasculature in animal and

Antineoplastic Agents

(10) (11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

human tumors. In Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics Discovery, Development, and Clinical Validation, Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Congress, Washington, DC, 1999; No.14, p 4. Griggs, J.; Metcalfe, J. C.; Hesketh, R. Targeting tumour vasculature: the development of combretastatin A4. Lancet Oncol. 2001, 2, 82-87. Pettit, G. R.; Singh, S. B.; Hamel, E.; Lin, C. M.; Alberts, D. S.; Garcia-Kendall, D. Isolation and structure of the strong cell growth and tubulin inhibitor combretastatin A-4. Experientia 1989, 45, 209-211. Gwaltney, S. L., II; Imade, H. M.; Barr, K. J.; Qun, L.; Gehrke, L.; Credo, R. B.; Warner, R. B.; Lee, J. Y.; Kovar, P.; Wang, J.; Nukkala, M. A.; Zielinski, N. A.; Frost, D.; Ng, S.; Sham, H. L. Novel sulfonate analogues of combretastatin A-4: potent antimitotic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 871-874. Maya, A.; Del Rey, B.; DeClairac, R. P.; Caballero, E.; Borasoain, I.; Andreu, J. M.; Medarde, M. Design, synthesis and cytotoxic activities of naphthyl analogs of combretastatin A-4. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2549-2551. Pinney, K. G.; Mejia, M. P.; Villalobos, V. M.; Rosenquist, B. E.; Pettit, G. R.; Verdier-Pinard, P.; Hamel, E. Synthesis and biological evaluation of aryl azide derivatives of combretastatin A-4 as molecular probes for tubulin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 2417-2425. Ohsumi, K.; Nakagawa, R.; Fukuda, Y.; Toshihiro, H.; Morinaga, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Ohishi, K.; Suga, Y.; Akiyama, Y.; Tsuji, T. Novel combretastatin analogues effective against murine solid tumors: design and structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3022-3032. Ohsumi, K.; Hatanaka, R.; Nakagawa, R.; Fukuda, Y.; Morinaga, Y.; Suga, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Ohishi, K.; Akiuama, Y.; Tsuji, T. Synthesis and antitumor activities of amino acid prodrugs of amino-combretastatins. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1999, 14, 539548. Grimaudo, S.; Tolomeo, M.; Capone, F.; Pagliaro, M.; Rodanin, R.; Baruchello, R.; Simoni, D.; Mariani, G. Effects of AC7739, a water-soluble amino derivative of combretastatin A-4, in multidrug-resistant and apoptosis-resistant leukemia cell lines. Blood 2001, 98, 445.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003, Vol. 46, No. 4 531 (18) Ohno, T.; Kawano, K.; Tahara, K.; Aramaki, M.; Sasaki, A.; Takeuchi, Y.; Kai, S.; Ishio, T.; Kitano, S. Antitumor effect of combretastatin A-4 derivative, AC7700, against rat liver cancer. Gastroenterology 2001, 120, 2831. (19) Waldeck, D. H. Photoisomerization dynamics of stilbenes. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 415-436. (20) Coste, J.; Frerot, E.; Jouin, P.; Castro, B. Oxybenzotriazole free peptide coupling reagents for N-methylated amino acids. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1967-1970. (21) Carpino, L. A.; Sadat-Aalaee, D.; Beyermann, M. Tris(2-aminoethyl)amine as a substitute for 4-(aminomethyl)piperidine in the FMOC/polyamine approach to rapid peptide synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1673-1675. (22) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard M7-A4; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, 1997. (23) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. Approved Standard M27-A; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, 1997. (24) Verdier-Pinard, P.; Lai, J.-Y.; Yoo, H.-D.; Yu, J.; Marquez, B.; Nagle, D. G.; Nambu, M.; White, J. D.; Falck, J. R.; Gerwick, W. H.; Day, B. W.; Hamel, E. Structure-activity analysis of the interaction of curacin A, the potent colchicine site antimitotic agent, with tubulin and effects of analogs on the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998, 53, 62-76. (25) SHELXTL-NT, version 5.10 (1997), an integrated suite of programs for the determination of crystal structures from diffraction data, is available from Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI 53719. This package includes, among others, XPREP (an automatic space group determination program), SHELXS (a structure solution program via Patterson or direct methods), and SHELXL (structure refinement software). (26) Blessing, R. H. An Empirical Corrrection for Absorption Anisotropy. Acta Crystallogr. 1995, A51, 33-38.

JM020204L