Assessment of Effects of the Long-Term Exposure of Agricultural

Aug 14, 2017 - However, to develop a technology that will be suitable for food crops and approved by federal agencies, many questions have to be answe...
3 downloads 13 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE LIBRARIES

Article

Assessment of effects of the long-term exposure of agricultural crops to carbon nanotubes Mohamed Hassen Lahiani, Zeid A Nima, Hector Villagarcia, Alexandru S. Biris, and Mariya Khodakovskaya J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01863 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 15, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 37

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

2

Assessment of Effects of the Long-term Exposure of Agricultural

3

Crops to Carbon Nanotubes

4 5

Mohamed H. Lahiani1, Zeid Nima2, Hector Villagarcia1, Alexandru S. Biris2, Mariya V.

6

Khodakovskaya1*

7 8 9 10

1

-Department of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205.

2-

Center for Integrative Nanotechnology Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little

Rock , Arkansas, 72205. *Author for correspondence: [email protected]

11

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

12 13

ABSTRACT

14 15

Carbon-based nanomaterials (CBNs) were described as nanomaterials possessing abilities of

16

plant growth regulators. Here, we investigated the effects of long-term exposure of multi-walled

17

carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on the growth of three important crops (barley, soybean, corn).

18

The cultivation of all tested species was carried in hydroponics supplemented with 50µg/ml of

19

MWCNTs. After 20 weeks of continuous exposure to the nanomaterials, no significant toxic

20

signs on plant development were observed. Several positive phenotypical changes were recorded

21

in addition to the enhancement of photosynthesis in MWCNTs-exposed crops. Raman

22

spectroscopy with point-by-point mapping proved that MWCNTs added to hydroponics solution

23

moved into all tested species and were distributed in analyzed organs (leaves, stems, roots,

24

seeds).

25

agriculture. However, documented presence of MWCNTs in different organs of all exposed

26

crops again highlighted the importance of detail risk assessment of nano-contaminated plants

27

moving into the food chain.

Our results confirmed the significant potentials of CBN’s applications in plant

28 29

KEYWORDS

30

CBNs uptake, carbon nanotubes, plant growth, detection of carbon nanotubes in plants,

31

hydroponics system

32

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 37

Page 3 of 37

33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

INTRODUCTION

34

A wide range of CBNs (carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, graphene) may stimulate seed

35

germination, plant growth 1-4, production of flowers/fruits 5 and activate plant cell division 1, 6. It

36

was shown that CBNs are capable of penetrating plant cell walls as well as thick seed coat

37

Positive effects of CBNs in planta are reproducible for different crop species

38

achievable by a number of delivery methods including spray, introduction in soil/growth medium

39

7, 10

1, 3, 7, 10-13

3, 7-9

.

and

. Reproducibility and consistency of effects of CBNs are solid foundations for the

40

development of new plant growth regulators based in “nano-formula”. However, in order to

41

develop the technology that will be suitable for food crops and approved by Federal Agencies,

42

many questions have to be answered. Firstly, it has to be proven that long-term exposure of

43

plants to CBNs will not lead to toxic effects in planta. Previously, it had been demonstrated that

44

positive effects of CBNs can be observed when CBNs were used in relatively low doses (10-100

45

ug/ml) 7, 10, 14. However, long-term contact with plants with CBNs used as fertilizers may modify

46

the response of exposed plants. Secondly, a comprehensive risk assessment of food crops

47

exposed to CBNs to humans and animals should be performed at several levels including the

48

confirmation of contamination of exposed plants with nanomaterials, toxicity tests using in vitro

49

and in vivo experiments. The first group of risk assessment experiments (detection of

50

nanomaterials on exposed plants) will rely on the development of sensitive and relatively simple

51

analytical techniques. The detection of carbon nanomaterials in complex biological systems is

52

rather difficult, given their carbon chemical structure, which cannot be easily discriminated from

53

that of the actual biological system. The existing methods for detection and visualization of

54

CBNs in organic tissues have many challenges. Using microscopic methods such as confocal

55

laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)15, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 16, and scanning 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

56

electron microscopy (SEM)17,

18

57

reason, these methods should be combined with other spectroscopic methods for confirmation of

58

the nanoparticle presence. Two of the most promising spectroscopic techniques for the

59

carbonaceous nanomaterials are Raman spectroscopy (based on light scattering) and

60

photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) (based on light absorption). Raman spectroscopy uses the

61

specific peaks characteristic to the CBNs and their intensity to detect and actually map the

62

presence of these nanomaterials in the biological systems1, 7, 13, 19, 20. Therefore, the combination

63

of CBNs exposure to plant systems and the Raman spectroscopy analysis of their presence and

64

possibly distribution could elucidate some of the underlying phenomena at the interface between

65

nanoscale materials and agriculturally valuable species.

, CNTs can be misled for plant cellular structures. For this

66

The goal of this investigation was to understand the biological response of three crop species

67

(barley, corn, and soybean) after long-term exposure to a representative type of CBNs (multi-

68

walled carbon nanotubes, MWCNTs). The long-term exposure to MWCNTs was achieved by

69

the cultivation of all tested species in hydroponics solution supplemented with MWCNTs for 20

70

weeks. The response of plants on such treatment was monitored by phenotypical studies,

71

characterization of the photosynthetic ability of exposed plants and proof of translocation of

72

MWCNTs in different organs (Figure 1).

73 74 75

MATERIALS AND METHODS Delivery of MWCNTs to plants though addition to hydroponic systems

76

The hydroponic system was obtained from Hydrofarm ® (Grand Prairie, TX). Each tray

77

contained six planters and plants were supported with clay pebbles. The system was linked with

78

an air pump to keep roots and nutrient solutions well aerated. A water pump was used to provide 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 37

Page 5 of 37

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

79

a continuous flow of nutrients and carbon nanotubes in the solution. The trays were filled with

80

10 L of deionized water and supplemented with 0.5 ml of nutrient solution per 1 L of water. The

81

solution level was kept constant by checking the solution level daily, using a view/drain tube.

82

Nutrient solutions were provided weekly for the hydroponic systems. The hydroponic control

83

systems consisted of water and nutrients solution only. However, the treated hydroponic systems

84

included a solution of MWCNT. MWCNTs were synthesized at the Center of integrative for

85

Nanotechnology Sciences at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. The Carbon

86

nanomaterials were characterized as described earlier by Lahiani et al., (2013). MWCNTs were

87

dispersed using a QSonica, LLC (Newtown, CT) sonicator. MWCNTs were added to the 2-week

88

old seedlings in hydroponics for three consecutive weeks as following: 100 mg in week 1 and an

89

addition of 200 mg in weeks 2 and 3. Using a water level indicator, the water level was

90

maintained at 10L during the whole experiment. The growth of control plants and plant exposed

91

to MWCNTs was monitored by: A) counting the number of leaves, internodes, fruits (soybean

92

and corn), spikelet (barley) ; B) measuring the shoot length, internode length , fruit length, lateral

93

branches (soybean and corn), tillers (barley); C) determining the total fresh/dry weight of shoots,

94

leaves, roots and fruits.

95 96

Statistics for tests of germination and plant growth All assays were performed in triplicate. All figures are represented as mean values ± SE

97

(standard errors). All data were analyzed using SPSS® software by performing repeated measure

98

ANOVA for time-effect analysis and ANOVA and posthoc analysis using the Tukey test for

99

treatment differences. Statistical significance was determined by p Vicia faba L.) seedlings under combined stress of lead and cadmium. J.

386

Hazard. Mater. 2014, 274, 404-412.

387

33.

388

(< i> Amaranthus tricolor L) and the role of ascorbic acid as an antioxidant. J. Hazard.

389

Mater. 2012, 243, 212-222.

390

34.

391

(Amaranthus tricolor L) and the role of ascorbic acid as an antioxidant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012,

392

243, 212-222.

Khodakovskaya, M. V.; Lahiani, M. H., Role of Nanoparticles for Delivery of Genetic

Begum, P.; Ikhtiari, R.; Fugetsu, B., Potential Impact of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Begum, P.; Ikhtiari, R.; Fugetsu, B., Graphene phytotoxicity in the seedling stage of

Jiang, Y.; Hua, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q. In The Effect of Carbon

Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Chen, J.; Tian, Y.; Shi, J.; Li, D.; Guo, C.; Ma, Q., Carboxylated

Begum, P.; Fugetsu, B., Phytotoxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on red spinach

Begum, P.; Fugetsu, B., Phytotoxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on red spinach

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 37

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

393

35.

Giraldo, J. P.; Landry, M. P.; Kwak, S. Y.; Jain, R. M.; Wong, M. H.; Iverson, N. M.;

394

Ben‐Naim, M.; Strano, M. S., A Ratiometric Sensor Using Single Chirality Near‐Infrared

395

Fluorescent Carbon Nanotubes: Application to In Vivo Monitoring. Small 2015, 11, 3973–3984.

396

36. Kole, C.; Kole, P.; Randunu, K. M.; Choudhary, P.; Podila, R.; Ke, P. C.; Rao, A. M.;

397

Marcus, R. K., Nanobiotechnology can boost crop production and quality: first evidence from

398

increased plant biomass, fruit yield and phytomedicine content in bitter melon (Momordica

399

charantia). BMC biotechnology 2013, 13, 1.

400

37.

401

M.; Mizukami, H.; Bianco, A.; Baba, Y., Trafficking and subcellular localization of multiwalled

402

carbon nanotubes in plant cells. ACS nano 2011, 5, 493-499.

403

38.

404

plant cell biology: carbon nanotubes as organelle targeting nanocarriers. RSC Advances 2013, 3,

405

4856-4862.

406

39.

407

Limbach, L. K., No Evidence for Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticle Translocation in Maize Plants.

408

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8718-8723.

409

40.

410

the brain of juvenile large mouth bass. Environ. Health Perspect 2004, 112, 1058-1062.

411

41.

412

Nanobiotechno 2014, 12, 16.

413

42.

414

Ono, A.; Kamata, E.; Hirose, A., No toxicological effects on acute and repeated oral gavage

Serag, M. F.; Kaji, N.; Gaillard, C.; Okamoto, Y.; Terasaka, K.; Jabasini, M.; Tokeshi,

Serag, M. F.; Kaji, N.; Habuchi, S.; Bianco, A.; Baba, Y., Nanobiotechnology meets

Birbaum, K.; Brogioli, R.; Schellenberg, M.; Martinoia, E.; Stark, W. J.; Günther, D.;

Oberdorster, E., Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in

Husen, A.; Siddiqi, K. S., Carbon and fullerene nanomaterials in plant system. J

Matsumoto, M.; Serizawa, H.; Sunaga, M.; Kato, H.; Takahashi, M.; Hirata-Koizumi, M.;

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

415

doses of single-wall or multi-wall carbon nanotube in rats. The Journal of toxicological sciences

416

2012, 37, 463-474.

417

43.

418

damaged DNA in rats exposed by oral gavage to C60 fullerenes and single-walled carbon

419

nanotubes. Environmental health perspectives 2009, 117, 703–708.

420

44.

421

nanotubes in biological samples through microwave-induced heating. Carbon 2012, 50, 4441-

422

4449.

423

45.

424

F.; Carriere, M., Accumulation, translocation and impact of TiO2 nanoparticles in wheat

425

(Triticum aestivum spp.): Influence of diameter and crystal phase. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 431,

426

197-208.

427

46.Long, S.P.; Zhu, X.; Naidu,S. L.;Ort, D.R.,Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop

428

yield. Plant, Cell and Environment (2006) 29, 315-330

429

47. Evans, J.R., Improving photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:1780-1793

Page 20 of 37

Folkmann, J. K.; Risom, L.; Jacobsen, N. R.; Wallin, H.; Loft, S.; Moller, P., Oxidatively

Irin, F.; Shrestha, B.; Cañas, J. E.; Saed, M. A.; Green, M. J., Detection of carbon

Larue, C.; Laurette, J.; Herlin-Boime, N.; Khodja, H.; Fayard, B.; Flank, A.-M.; Brisset,

430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 37

438

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure Captions

439 440

Figure 1. Experiment design focused of monitoring effects of long-term exposure of crop

441

species (barley, corn, and soybean) to MWCNT through cultivation in hydroponics system

442

supplemented with MWCNT. Experimental stages involved the preparation of hydroponics

443

solution, cultivation stage (20 weeks), and the bio-effects monitoring stage.

444 445

Figure 2. Average Photosynthetic light-response curves for MWCNTs treated and non-treated

446

corn (A) and soybean (B) plants growing in hydroponic systems supplemented with MWCNT.

447

These curves are the average of four plant measurement. All the measurements were conducted

448

at 400 ppm CO2 and ~25°C. *, p