Decomposition of Nitrogen Pentoxide in the Presence of Nitric Oxide

David J. Wilson, and Harold S. Johnston. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 1953, 75 (22), pp 5763–5763. DOI: 10.1021/ja01118a529. Publication Date: November 1953...
1 downloads 0 Views 134KB Size
NOTES

Nov. 20, 1953

5763

tion fMi is the efficiency factor for deactivation which in general may be a function of each state i and a different function for each foreign gas M. If the collision constant can be calculated by 1, then the relative with b M factored out -efficiencies give the ratios ( f ~ ) / ( f ~where ) , 1stands for nitrogen pentoxide, and the bar indicates an average with respect to P i over the excited states. If deactivation occurred a t every collision or if fw depended on the quantum states i of the reactant molecule only but not on the identity of the foreign gas NI, this ratio would be unity every time. It is not. Pentoxide in the Pres- (See Table 11. This table includes data calculated Effect of Noble Gases from reference 4.)

difluoroacetate. In general, it appears that an increase in the extent of fluorination of an organic compound results in an increase in thermal expansion coefficient. Acknowledgment.-This work was carried out under a grant established at the University of Tennessee as the Fulton Fellowship by the FultonSylphon Company of Knoxville, Tennessee. DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY UNNERSITYOF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE, TENN.

Decomposition of Nitrogen ence of Nitric Oxide. IV.

BY DAVIDJ. WILSONAND HAROLD S. JOHNSTON RECEIVED JUNE 22, 1953

TABLE I1 EFFICIENCY AND RELATIVE EFFICIENCY Low

+

concn. rate The rate of the reaction NzOs NO + 3N02 has const./kinetic collision been shown by Smith and Daniels' and by Mills Collision const., and Johnston2 to be that of an elementary unimolecdiameter, A. Mol. wt. M gas X 1010 m/a ular reaction. At around 0.1 mm. pressure in a 2.18" 6.02 0,0650 He 4 22-liter flask, the reaction is homogeneous and defi7.95 .0855 2 . 5QE Ne 20 nitely within the second-order r e g i ~ n . ~ The low3.64" 14.3 .154 40 A concentration second-order rate constants of a ser4.16" 19.3 ,208 83.8 Kr ies of gases have been r e p ~ r t e d . ~ 4.85" 17.5 .189 131.3 Xe Using the 22-liter bulb, and the same method of 3.75" 21.2 ,228 x2 28 interpreting the data as was used p r e v i ~ u s l y , ~ * ~NO 27.9 ,300 3.75 30 we have determined the low-concentration second35.9 .387 4.59" coz 44 order rate constants of the noble gases and carbon 62.5 ,673 5.46 154 CCL tetrachloride. Reactant pressures were each about 4.52 41.2 443 SFe 146 0.08 mm., and foreign gas pressures ranged from 3 93.0 1.000 108 6.00 N2OS to 0.02 mm. Experimental results are given in a From E. H. Kennard, "Kinetic Theory of Gases," McTable I. Graw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N. Y., 1938, p. 149. I

TABLE I EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Low concn.

M gas

No. of points

Intercept, set.-'

He Ne Kr Xe CCla

27 17 26 11 30

0,0132 ,0129 .0119 ,0134 ,0130

second-order rate constant, cc. mole-1 sec.-l X 10s Standard Ratio t o Value error pure N2Os

2.80 2.02 3.57 3.30 12.4

0.26 .32 .23 .95 1.3

0.124 .090

.159 .147 ,551

As shown previously, the activating efficiency function of the state i above the critical energy, U M ~ ,can be written as a M i = b M i P i , that is, the rdative activating efficiency is also the relative deactivating efficiency. The function bMi is further factored, bMi = b ~ f ~where i , b M is the kinetic collision constant

where No is Avogadro's number; u1 and 6 2 , the collision diameters of the colliding particles; MI and Mz, the molecular weights of the colliding particles; and R and T have their usual meaning. The func(1) J. € Smith I. and F. Daniels, THIS JOURNAL, 69,1735 (1947). (2) R.L.Mills and H. S. Johnston, ibid., 73, 938 (1951). (3) H.S. Johnston and R. L. Perrine, ibid., 73, 4782 (1951). (4) H.S. Johnston, ibid., 76, 1667 (1953).

Furthermore, it is impossible to adjust the collision diameters of either nitrogen pentoxide - - or of the various M gases to obtain ratios ( f ~ ) / ( f l ) that are equal to unity. For the molecular weights are accurately known, and the ratio, (~~N,o,/uN,o, U M ) can ~ , never be greater than 4, which is not sufficiently large to account for the observed relative efficiencies of the noble gases and nitrogen. Thus, the efficiency function f m does differ markedly from one gas to another. (These results do not answer the question as to whether or how the efficiency function varies over the states i of the reactant molecule.) Relative efficiency increases slowly with molecular weight through at least krypton for the noble gases. It increases at,constant molecular weight as one goes from noble:,gases to diatomic or polyatomic gases, and nitrogen pentoxide is much more efficient than anything else we have yet used. A study of the relative efficiencies of diatomic and polar gases is now in progress. We are grateful to the National Science Foundation for a Fellowship in support of this work, and to the Office of Naval Research, Project NR-051-246, Contract N6 onr 25131.

+

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY

STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD, CAL.