Deduction of Physicochemical Properties from Solubilities: 2,4

Apr 15, 2015 - More complete lists of systems, including partitions into “wet” solvents(3-8) ..... The descriptors given in Table 5 make general c...
1 downloads 0 Views 277KB Size
Download PDF
Article pubs.acs.org/jced

Deduction of Physicochemical Properties from Solubilities: 2,4Dihydroxybenzophenone, Biotin, and Caprolactam as Examples Michael H. Abraham,*,† William E. Acree, Jr.,‡ Michela Brumfield,‡ Erin Hart,‡ Lila Pipersburgh,‡ Katherine Mateja,‡ Colleen Dai,‡ Damini Grover,‡ and Shoshana Zhang‡ †

Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K. Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle Drive #305070, Denton, Texas 76203-5017, United States

‡

ABSTRACT: Solubilities of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone have been measured at 298 K in 19 organic solvents. Combination with a known value of the solubility in water enables corresponding partition coefficients from water to these solvents to be deduced. It is shown that solubilities, via the partition coefficients, can yield the Abraham descriptors for 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, and that these, in turn, can be used to estimate a very large number of further solubilities, partition coefficients, and values of biological and environmental properties. This method of extracting information from solubilities is further illustrated using literature data on solubilities of biotin and of caprolactam.

1. INTRODUCTION There are now numerous reports of the determination of solubilities, often as the solubility of a given compound in a series of solvents. Such determinations are very important in the selection of solvents for crystallization, extraction, and purification. However, it is not widely appreciated that solubilities of a given compound in a series of solvents encode a great deal of information on physicochemical properties of the compound and that it is possible to determine these properties (or descriptors) through an analysis of the solubility data. Once these compound descriptors have been determined, they can be used to estimate a large number of further physicochemical, environmental, and biochemical properties of the compound. We illustrate the methods we have used through an analysis of our own data on solubilities of 2,4dihydroxybenzophenone, CAS Registry No. 131-56-6, and literature data on solubililities of biotin,1 CAS Registry No. 5885-5, and caprolactam,2 CAS Registry No. 105-62-2. The method used to extract compound descriptors from solubilities has been described several times,3−8 and reviews are also available.9,10 In brief, we use two linear equations, eq 1 and eq 2. The dependent variable, SP, is a set of values for a series of solutes in a given system. Thus, SP in eq 1 can be a series of partition coefficients, as log P, in a specific water−solvent system, and SP in eq 2 can be a series of gas−solvent partition coefficients, as log K, in a specific solvent. SP = c + eE + sS + aA + bB + vV

(1)

SP = c + eE + sS + aA + bB + lL

(2)

hexadecane partition coefficient at 298 K. The descriptors, in effect, summarize the propensity of a given solute to interact with surrounding solvent molecules. The coefficients in eq 1 and eq 2 are obtained by multiple linear regression analysis and serve to characterize the system under consideration. The coefficients are listed in Table 1 for a number of water to solvent and gas to solvent systems. It is important to note that the coefficients refer to hypothetical partitions between water or the gas phase and a “dry” solvent. More complete lists of systems, including partitions into “wet” solvents3−8 and various biological systems7 are available. Equations 1 and 2 can be applied to solubilities through eqs 3 and 4. P = C / Cw

K = C /Cg ,

K w = Cw /Cg ,

K = PK w

(4)

In these equations C and Cw are the solubilities of a solute, in mol dm−3, in a solvent and in water respectively, and Cg is the saturated vapor concentration of the solute, again in mol dm−3. Note that K and Kw are dimensionless. Equations 3 and 4 require that in the saturated solutions in water and the solvent the same species is in equilibrium with the solid phase, hence that no solvates are present. Solubilities in water and in a series of solvents of a given solute can then be converted into a series of log P values between water and the solvents. Once log P values are available for partition into a series of solvents for which the coefficients in eq 1 and eq 2 are known, see Table 1, it is possible to set up a series of simultaneous equations that can be solved to yield the unknown solute descriptors. The number of equations can be considerably increased through eq

The independent variables, or descriptors, are properties of the solutes as follows:3−10 E is the solute excess molar refractivity in units of (cm3 mol−1)/10, S is the solute dipolarity/polarizability, A and B are the overall or summation hydrogen bond acidity and basicity, V is the McGowan characteristic volume in units of (cm3 mol −1)/100, and L is the logarithm of the gas− © 2015 American Chemical Society

(3)

Received: December 16, 2014 Accepted: April 7, 2015 Published: April 15, 2015 1440

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

Table 1. Coefficients for Water−Solvent and Gas−Solvent Partitions, Equations 1 and 2, at 298 K solvent dichloromethane trichloromethane tetrachloromethane 1,2-dichloroethane hexane heptane octane decane dodecane hexadecane cyclohexane methylcyclohexane isooctane benzene toluene o-xylene m-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene fluorobenzene chlorobenzene bromobenzene iodobenzene nitrobenzene carbon disulfide methanol ethanol propan-1-ol butan-1-ol pentan-1-ol hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol octan-1-ol decan-1-ol propan-2-ol isobutanol butan-2-ol tert-butanol 3-methylbutan-1-ol pentan-2-ol 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol ethylene glycol diethyl ether dibutyl ether diisoprorpyl ether methyl tert-butyl ether tetrahydrofuran 1,4-dioxane methyl acetate ethyl acetate propyl acetate isopropyl acetate butyl acetate propanone butanone cyclohexanone dimethylformamide dimethylacetamide N-methylpyrolidinone N-formylmorpholine

c 0.319 0.191 0.199 0.183 0.333 0.297 0.241 0.172 0.114 0.087 0.159 0.246 0.318 0.142 0.125 0.083 0.122 0.166 0.093 0.139 0.065 −0.017 −0.192 −0.152 0.047 0.276 0.222 0.139 0.165 0.150 0.115 0.035 −0.034 −0.058 0.099 0.188 0.127 0.211 0.073 0.115 0.395 −0.270 0.330 0.203 0.472 0.376 0.207 0.098 0.351 0.328 0.288 0.000 0.248 0.313 0.246 0.038 −0.305 −0.271 0.147 −0.032

e

s

a

b

0.102 0.105 0.523 0.294 0.560 0.634 0.690 0.726 0.668 0.667 0.784 0.782 0.555 0.464 0.431 0.518 0.377 0.477 0.467 0.152 0.381 0.436 0.298 0.525 0.686 0.334 0.471 0.405 0.401 0.536 0.492 0.398 0.489 0.616 0.344 0.354 0.253 0.171 0.360 0.455 −0.094 0.578 0.401 0.369 0.413 0.264 0.372 0.350 0.223 0.369 0.363 0.000 0.356 0.312 0.256 0.225 −0.058 0.084 0.532 0.696

log P, Equation 1 in V −0.187 −0.403 −1.159 −0.134 −1.710 −1.755 −1.769 −1.750 −1.644 −1.617 −1.678 −1.982 −1.737 −0.588 −0.644 −0.813 −0.603 −0.812 −0.723 −0.374 −0.521 −0.424 −0.308 0.081 −0.943 −0.714 −1.035 −1.029 −1.011 −1.229 −1.164 −1.063 −1.044 −1.319 −1.049 −1.127 −0.976 −0.947 −1.273 −1.331 −0.594 −0.511 −0.814 −0.954 −0.745 −0.788 −0.392 −0.083 −0.150 −0.446 −0.474 0.000 −0.501 −0.121 −0.080 0.058 0.343 0.209 0.225 −0.062

−3.058 −3.112 −3.560 −2.801 −3.578 −3.571 −3.545 −3.446 −3.545 −3.587 −3.740 −3.517 −3.677 −3.099 −3.002 −2.884 −2.981 −2.939 −3.001 −3.030 −3.183 −3.174 −3.213 −2.332 −3.603 0.243 0.326 0.247 0.056 0.141 0.054 0.002 −0.024 0.026 0.406 0.016 0.158 0.331 0.090 0.206 −1.280 0.715 −0.457 −1.488 −0.632 −1.078 −0.236 −0.556 −1.035 −0.700 −0.784 0.000 −0.867 −0.608 −0.767 −0.976 0.358 0.915 0.840 0.014

−4.090 −3.514 −4.594 −4.291 −4.939 −4.946 −5.011 −4.496 −5.006 −4.869 −4.929 −4.293 −4.864 −4.625 −4.748 −4.821 −4.961 −4.874 −4.844 −4.601 −4.700 −4.558 −4.653 −4.494 −5.818 −3.320 −3.596 −3.767 −3.958 −3.864 −3.978 −4.342 −4.235 −4.153 −3.827 −3.568 −3.882 −4.085 −3.770 −3.745 −1.274 −2.619 −4.959 −5.426 −5.251 −5.030 −4.934 −4.826 −4.527 −4.904 −4.938 0.000 −4.973 −4.753 −4.855 −4.842 −4.865 −5.003 −4.794 −4.092

1441

v 4.324 4.395 4.618 4.180 4.463 4.488 4.511 4.489 4.459 4.433 4.577 4.528 4.417 4.491 4.524 4.559 4.535 4.532 4.514 4.540 4.614 4.445 4.588 4.187 4.921 3.549 3.857 3.986 4.044 4.077 4.131 4.317 4.218 4.279 4.033 3.986 4.114 4.109 4.273 4.201 3.088 2.729 4.320 4.508 4.059 4.410 4.447 4.172 3.972 4.150 4.216 0.000 4.281 3.942 4.148 4.315 4.486 4.557 3.674 3.405

l 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

Table 1. continued solvent

c

e

N-methylformamide N-methylacetamide formamide acetonitrile nitromethane dimethyl sulfoxide tributylphosphate propylene carbonate gas−water

0.114 0.090 −0.171 0.413 0.023 −0.194 0.327 0.004 −0.994

0.407 0.205 0.070 0.077 −0.091 0.327 0.570 0.168 0.577

dichloromethane trichloromethane tetrachloromethane 1,2-dichloroethane hexane heptane octane decane dodecane hexadecane cyclohexane methylcyclohexane isooctane benzene toluene o-xylene m-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene fluorobenzene chlorobenzene bromobenzene iodobenzene nitrobenzene carbon disulfide, methanol ethanol propan-1-ol butan-1-ol pentan-1-ol hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol octan-1-ol decan-1-ol propan-2-ol isobutanol butan-2-ol tert-butanol 3-methylbutan-1-ol pentan-2-ol 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol ethylene glycol diethyl ether dibutyl ether diisopropylether methyl tert-butyl ether tetrahydrofuran 1,4-dioxane methyl acetate ethyl acetate

0.192 0.157 0.217 0.017 0.320 0.284 0.219 0.159 0.017 0.000 0.163 0.318 0.264 0.107 0.085 0.064 0.071 0.113 0.059 0.181 0.064 −0.064 −0.171 −0.296 0.101 −0.039 0.017 −0.042 −0.004 −0.002 −0.014 −0.056 −0.147 −0.139 −0.048 −0.003 −0.034 0.053 −0.052 −0.031 −0.092 −0.887 0.288 0.165 0.114 0.278 0.189 −0.034 0.134 0.182

−0.572 −0.560 −0.435 −0.337 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 −0.110 −0.215 −0.230 −0.313 −0.400 −0.296 −0.423 −0.302 −0.295 −0.621 −0.399 −0.326 −0.192 0.092 0.251 −0.338 −0.232 −0.246 −0.285 −0.161 −0.205 −0.216 −0.214 −0.090 −0.324 −0.357 −0.387 −0.443 −0.430 −0.325 −0.547 0.132 −0.347 −0.421 −0.032 −0.489 −0.347 −0.354 −0.477 −0.352

s log P, Equation 1 in V −0.287 −0.172 0.308 0.326 0.793 0.791 −0.837 0.504 2.549 log K, Equation 2 in L 1.492 1.259 0.554 1.600 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.053 1.063 0.934 1.068 0.826 0.924 1.432 1.151 1.261 1.197 1.707 0.177 1.317 0.867 0.749 0.768 0.535 0.583 0.554 0.561 0.356 0.713 0.699 0.719 0.699 0.628 0.496 1.339 1.657 0.775 0.760 0.685 0.801 1.238 1.674 1.749 1.316 1442

a

b

v

l

0.542 1.305 0.589 −1.566 −1.463 1.260 −1.069 −1.283 3.813

−4.085 −4.589 −3.152 −4.391 −4.364 −4.540 −4.333 −4.407 4.841

3.471 3.833 2.432 3.364 3.460 3.361 3.919 3.421 −0.869

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.460 0.374 0.000 0.774 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.457 0.501 0.647 0.552 0.651 0.573 0.647 0.313 0.323 0.245 1.147 0.027 3.826 3.894 3.888 3.705 3.778 3.621 3.596 3.507 3.547 4.036 3.595 3.736 4.026 3.661 3.792 2.213 4.457 2.985 2.102 3.108 2.495 3.289 3.021 2.678 2.891

0.847 1.333 0.000 0.637 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.098 0.000 0.171 0.292 0.245 0.443 0.095 1.396 1.192 1.076 0.879 0.960 0.891 0.803 0.749 0.727 1.055 1.247 1.088 0.882 0.932 1.024 3.807 2.355 0.000 −0.664 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.965 0.976 1.069 0.921 0.945 0.950 0.960 0.972 0.989 1.000 1.013 1.012 0.975 1.020 1.011 1.010 1.014 1.011 1.010 0.986 1.032 1.002 1.002 0.912 1.068 0.773 0.846 0.874 0.890 0.900 0.913 0.933 0.943 0.958 0.884 0.881 0.905 0.907 0.937 0.934 0.645 0.565 0.973 1.002 0.941 0.993 0.982 0.919 0.876 0.916

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

Table 1. continued solvent propyl acetate butyl acetate propanone butanone cyclohexanone dimethylformamide dimethylacetamide N-methylpyrrolidinone N-methyl-2-piperidone N-formylmorpholine N-methylformamide N-methylacetamide formamide acetonitrile nitromethane dimethyl sulfoxide tributylphosphate, gas−water

c 0.165 0.147 0.127 0.112 −0.086 −0.391 −0.308 −0.128 −0.264 −0.437 −0.249 −0.197 −0.800 −0.007 −0.340 −0.556 0.097 −1.271

e

s

−0.383 −0.414 −0.387 −0.474 −0.441 −0.869 −0.736 −0.029 −0.171 0.024 −0.142 −0.175 0.310 −0.595 −0.297 −0.223 −0.098 0.822

log K, Equation 2 in L 1.264 1.212 1.733 1.671 1.725 2.107 1.802 2.217 2.086 2.631 1.661 1.608 2.292 2.461 2.689 2.903 1.103 2.743

a 2.757 2.623 3.060 2.878 2.786 3.774 4.361 4.429 5.056 4.318 4.147 4.867 4.130 2.085 2.193 5.037 2.411 3.904

b 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.817 0.375 1.933 0.418 0.514 0.000 0.588 4.814

v

l

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.935 0.954 0.866 0.916 0.957 1.011 1.028 0.777 0.883 0.712 0.739 0.837 0.442 0.738 0.728 0.719 0.844 −0.213

Table 2. Source and Purity for 2,4-Dihydroxybenzophenone and the Organic Solvents Used

a

chemical

source (manufacturer purity)

puritya

methodb

2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone hexane heptane octane cyclohexane methylcyclohexane isooctane toluene ethylbenzene o-xylene m-xylene p-xylene chlorobenzene butan-1-ol pentan-1-ol hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol octan-1-ol butan-2-ol diisopropyl ether 2-ethoxyethanol 2-isopropoxyethanol

Acros Organic (0.99) Aldrich (0.99+) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.99) Fluka (0.99) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.995) Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.99+) Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.998) Aldrich (HPLC grade) Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.998) Aldrich (HPLC) Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.99+) Aldrich (HPLC) Aldrich (HPLC) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.998) Sigma-Aldrich (0.99+) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.99) Avocado Chemicals (0.99) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.99+) Aldrich (anhydrous, 0.995) Sigma-Aldrich (anhydroux, 0.99) Aldrich (0.99) Aldrich (0.99)

0.996 0.998 0.998 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998

GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC GLC

Mass fraction purity after recrystallization (solute) or distillation (solvents). bAnalysis method: GLC is gas−liquid chromatography.

Solubility Measurements. Solubilities were determined by spectrophometric analysis. An excess amount of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone and the solvent were placed in amber glass bottles and allowed to equilibrate in a constant temperature water bath at 298.2 ± 0.1 K for at least 3 days (often longer) with periodic agitation. After equilibration, the samples stood unagitated for several hours in the constant temperature bath to allow any finely dispersed solid particles to settle to the bottom of the container. Attainment of equilibrium was verified both by repetitive measurements performed 2 days later and by approaching equilibrium from supersaturation by pre-equilibrating the samples at a slightly higher temperature for several hours. Aliquots of saturated solutions were transferred into a

4, by taking Kw as another unknown and converting all of the values of log P into the corresponding values of log K. Some simplification is possible because E can be obtained from known structural fragments of the solute11 and V can simply be calculated from structure.11,12

2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Materials. 2,4-Dihydroxybenzophenone was purchased from a commercial source and was recrystallized twice from anhydrous methanol before use. All organic solvents were dried over molecular sieves and distilled prior to use. The sources, mass fraction purities, and analysis methods of the chemicals are given in Table 2. 1443

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

tared volumetric flask and then weighed to determine the amount of sample. After weighing the solution was diluted quantitatively with propan-2-ol. Concentrations of the dilute solutions were determined by spectrophotometric analysis at 324 nm (Milton Roy Spectronic 1001 Plus) using a Beer− Lambert law absorbance versus concentration working curve based on the measured absorbances of nine standard solutions having concentrations between 5.73 × 10−5 M and 1.91 × 10−4 M. The calculated molar absorptivity, ε = 10,140 L/(mol cm), was constant over the stated concentration range. Experimental molar concentrations were converted to (mass/mass) solubility fractions by multiplying by the molar mass of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, volume(s) of volumetric flask(s) used and any dilutions required to place the measured absorbances on the Beer−Lambert law absorbance versus concentration working curve, and then dividing by the mass of the saturated sample analyzed. Mole fraction solubilities were computed from solubility mass fractions using the molar masses of the solute and solvent. Experimental 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone solubilities, xS, in the 21 organic solvents studied are reported in Table 3. Numerical values represent the average of between four and ten independent determinations and were reproducible to within ± 1.5 % (relative percent error).

calculated C values as 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone exhibits a very low solubility in many of the organic solvents considered in the present investigation. Solubilities of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone at 298 K, in mol dm−3 solution (molarity scale), are in Table 4. The value for the aqueous solubility is that given by Lu and Lu.13 Table 4. Solubilities (mol dm −3) of 2,4Dihydroxybenzophenone at 298 K solvent water hexane heptane octane cyclohexane methylcyclohexane isooctane toluene o-xylene m-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene chlorobenzene butan-1-ol pentan-1-ol hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol octan-1-ol butan-2-ol diisopropyl ether

Table 3. Experimental Mole Fraction Solubilities of 2,4Dihydroxybenzophenone, xS, in Select Organic Solvents at 298.2 Ka and p = 0.1 MPa organic solvent

xSb

hexane heptane octane cyclohexane methylcyclohexane isooctane toluene ethylbenzene o-xylene m-xylene p-xylene chlorobenzene butan-1-ol pentan-1-ol hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol octan-1-ol butan-2-ol diisopropyl ether 2-ethoxyethanol 2-isopropoxyethanol

0.0000326 0.0000382 0.0000443 0.0000507 0.0000692 0.0000331 0.00364 0.00408 0.00429 0.00415 0.00448 0.00440 0.0109 0.0125 0.0161 0.0180 0.0183 0.0103 0.00744 0.0308 0.0333

Ca

log C

log C(calc)

0.000248 0.000259 0.000271 0.000466 0.000539 0.000199 0.03402 0.03531 0.03358 0.03604 0.03314 0.04298 0.1174 0.1141 0.1277 0.1263 0.1156 0.1104 0.05211

−3.370 −3.606 −3.587 −3.567 −3.332 −3.268 −3.701 −1.468 −1.452 −1.474 −1.443 −1.480 −1.367 −0.930 −0.943 −0.894 −0.899 −0.937 −0.957 −1.283

−3.617 −3.578 −3.562 −3.229 −3.286 −3.765 −1.371 −1.543 −1.505 −1.636 −1.584 −1.179 −0.844 −0.907 −0.923 −0.943 −0.912 −0.852 −1.396

b

tetrachloromethane diethyl ether propanone ethyl acetate nitrobenzene dimethylformamide dimethyl sulfoxide a

log C(pred)

−2.199 −1.788 −0.088 −0.452 −1.171 0.860 1.418

From Table 3 after conversion to the molar scale. bFrom ref 13.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The solubilities of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone in Table 4 yield 19 values of the corresponding water−solvent partition coefficients, P, through eq 3. Then if the value of log Kw is allowed to float, a further set of 19 gas−solvent partition coefficients can be obtained through eq 4. There are also two extra equations for the gas−water partition, see Table 1, to yield a total of 40 simultaneous equations with coefficients as shown in Table 1. The value of E was taken11 as 1.73, and V was calculated12 as 1.5982; this leaves S, A, B, L, and log Kw as unknowns to be determined from the set of simultaneous equations by a “best-fit” method. With the descriptors given in Table 5, the 40 simultaneous equations were solved with a standard deviation of 0.095 log units. The calculated values of P can then be converted into calculated solubilities through eq 3, and the latter are given in Table 4. For solubilities in the 19 organic solvents, the average error between the experimental and the calculated values, AE, is 0.002, the absolute average error, AAE, is 0.071, and the standard deviation, SD, is 0.092 log units.

a

Standard uncertainty in temperature is u(T) = 0.1 K. bRelative standard uncertainty in the mole fraction solubility is ur(x) = 0.015.

Calculation of the solute descriptors requires that experimental mole fraction solubilities be converted to molar solubilities. This is accomplished by dividing xS, by the ideal molar volume of the saturated solution (i.e., C ≈ xS/[xSVsolute + (1 − xS)Vsolvent]). A value of Vsolute = 164.2 cm3 mol−1 was used for the molar volume of the hypothetical subcooled liquid 2,4dihydroxybenzophenone. Any errors resulting from our estimation of the 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone’s hypothetical subcooled liquid molar volume, Vsolute, or the ideal molar volume approximation should have negligible effect of the 1444

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

Table 5. Obtained Descriptors compd

E

S

A

B

V

L

log Kw

2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone biotin caprolactam

1.73 1.35 0.59

2.03 2.49 1.72

0.49 0.93 0.38

0.70 1.31 0.75

1.5982 1.7536 0.9609

9.062 9.563 4.914

9.06 14.54 7.98

Table 6. Solubilities of Biotin, as log C, at 298 K

The descriptors given in Table 5 make general chemical sense. The hydrogen-bond acidity, A, seems very low, but the 2hydroxy group forms a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen, so the overall hydrogen bond acidity is entirely due to the 4-hydroxyl group. Lu and Lu13 determined the solubility of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone not only in water but also in water−ethanol mixtures. We have determined equation coefficients for water− ethanol mixtures across the whole composition range with compositions in volume percent of ethanol.14 The solubility determinations of Lu and Lu were all at low ethanol concentrations, and the various log P values contribute very little with regard to the set of simultaneous equations. We therefore did not use the solubilities in water−ethanol mixtures in the deduction of descriptors for 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, but instead we used the obtained descriptors to predict log P for water−ethanol mixtures and then to predict log C in the mixtures. These are shown in Figure 1 as a function of volume percent of ethanol.

solvent

obs

calc

water methanol ethanol dimethylformamide dimethyl sulfoxide acetic acid

−3.67 −2.77 −2.97 −1.34 −0.31 −1.41

−2.62 −3.03 −1.37 −0.33

pred

−8.81 −6.88 −5.65 −4.29 −3.12 −3.75 −3.62 −1.02

hexane tetrachloromethane toluene diethyl ether propanone ethyl acetate nitrobenzene dimethylacetamide

given compound have been determined in organic solvents, but not in water, so it appears that the partition coefficients required for our analysis cannot be deduced through eq 3. However, it is possible to circumvent this difficulty by using the water solubility, as log Cw, as another unknown to be determined by the usual trial-and-error method. We use caprolactam as an example of a compound for which only solubilities in organic solvents are available. Guo et al.15 determined solubilities in five organic solvents. Values of log C at 298 K are given in Table 7. With log Cw as an unknown to be Table 7. Solubilities of Caprolactam, as log C, at 298 K solvent water propan-1-ol propan-2-ol butan-1-ol diisopropyl ether methyl tert-butyl ether

Figure 1. Solubility of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone in water−ethanol mixtures: ●, predicted solubility; ○, observed solubility from Lu and Lu.13

Biotin, vitamin H, is an important compound. It has a rather unusual structure, and we use it as another illustration of determination of properties, this time from a rather restricted number of solubilities. The procedure is exactly the same as that described for 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone. Su et al.1 have determined solubilities of biotin in water and five solvents as shown in Table 6. We have no equation for acetic acid and so are restricted to only four partition coefficients, as found using eq 3. However, we can convert all of the log P values to values of log K through eq 4; we have two extra equations in log Kw, see Table 1, and so have a total of ten simultaneous equations. We take E as 1.3511 and V as 1.7536,12 and have easily enough equations to determine the unknowns S, A, B, L, and log Kw, as given in Table 5. In the case of 2,4-hydroxybenzophenone and biotin, it was possible to convert all of the solubilities in organic solvents into corresponding partition coefficients through a known value of the solubility in water. There are cases where solubilities of a

hexane tetrachloromethane toluene diethyl ether propanone ethyl acetate nitrobenzene dimethylformamide dimethyl sulfoxide

obs

calc

0.49 0.44 0.39 −0.34 0.01

0.78 0.48 0.43 0.38 −0.32 0.01

pred

−2.28 −1.07 −0.31 0.20 1.06 0.60 0.84 1.83 2.44

determined, these solubilities yield five water−solvent partition coefficients, through eq 3. Then if log Kw is taken as another unknown, five gas−solvent partition coefficients are available. In addition, there are two equations, see Table 1, for gas− solvent partitions, making up 12 equations in total. We take E as 0.5911 and V as 0.9609,12 leaving six unknowns to be determined, viz., S, A, B, L, log Cw, and log Kw. There are easily 1445

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Article

(7) Abraham, M. H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Descriptors for artemisinin and its derivatives; estimation of physicochemical and biochemical data. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2013, 2, 1027−1037. (8) Abraham, M. H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Descriptors for the prediction of partition coefficients for 8-hydroxyquinoline and its derivatives. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 2135−2141. (9) Abraham, M. H.; Ibrahim, A.; Zissimos, A. M. The determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037, 29−47. (10) Clarke, E. D.; Mallon, L. The Determination of Abraham Descriptors and Their Application to Crop Protection Research. In Modern Methods in Crop Protection Research; Jeschke, P., Krämer, W., Schirmer, U., Witschel, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Berlin, 2012. (11) Absolv, version 5.0; Advanced Chemistry Development: Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (12) Abraham, M. H.; McGowan, J. C. The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 1987, 23, 243−246. (13) Lu, L.-L.; Lu, X.-Y. Solubililities of polyhydroybenzophenones in an ethanol + water mixture from (293.15 to 343.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2008, 53, 1996−1998. (14) Abraham, M. H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Partition coefficients and solubilities of compounds in the water-ethanol solvent system. J. Solution Chem. 2011, 40, 1279−1290. (15) Guo, C.; Li, L.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, W. Solubilty of caprolactam in different organic solvents. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2012, 319, 9−15. (16) Stephens, T. W.; Chou, V.; Quay, A. N.; Shen, C.; Dabadge, N.; Tian, A.; Loera, M.; Willis, B.; Wilson, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Twu, P.; Anderson, J. L.; Abraham, M. H. Thermochemical investigations of solute transfer into ionic liquid solvents: Updated Abraham model equation coefficients for solute activity coefficient and partition coefficient predictions. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2014, 52, 488−518. (17) Stephens, T. W.; Hart, E.; Kuprasertkul, N.; Mehta, S.; Wadawadigi, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M. H. Abraham model correlations for describing solute transfer into ionic liquid solvents: Calculation of ion-specific equation coefficients for the 4,5-dicyano-2(trifluoromethyl)imidazolide anion. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2014, 52, 777− 791. (18) Abraham, M. H.; Gola, J. M. R.; Ibrahim, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Liu, X. X. The prediction of blood-tissue partitions, water-skin partitions and skin permeation for agrochemicals. Pest. Manage. Sci. 2014, 70, 1130−1137. (19) Abraham, M. H.; Gola, J. M. R.; Ibrahim, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Liu, X. A simple method for estimating in vitro air-tissue and in vivo blood-tissue partition coefficients. Chemosphere 2015, 120, 188−191. (20) Endo, S.; Goss, K.-U. Applications of polyparameter linear free energy relationships in environmental chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 12477−12491. (21) Abraham, M. H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Prediction of gas to water partition coefficients from 273 to 373 K using predicted enthalpies and heat capacities of hydration. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2007, 262, 97−110. (22) Abraham, M. H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. The hydrogen bond properties of water from 273 to 573 K; equations for the prediction of gas-water partition coefficients. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 7433−7440.

enough equations to obtain these unknowns by the method of simultaneous equations. We find with log Cw as 0.78, and with the descriptors given in Table 5, calculated solubilities are very close to those observed, see Table 7. Once descriptors are known for a given compound, they can be combined with coefficients in eq 1 and eq 2 to predict partition coefficients from water and the gas phase to any of the solvents listed in Table 1. Then from either an experimental value of log Cw, or from a calculated value, the corresponding solubilities in the solvents can be obtained, trivially. Some predicted solubilites obtained in this way are given in Tables 4, 6, and 7 and illustrate the use of the present method in the selection of solvents for extraction and purification. Partition coefficients from water and the gas phase to wet solvents, and corresponding solubilities in wet solvents can similarly be predicted using the required equation coefficients that we have listed.3−8 Equation coefficients are available for partition from water and the gas phase into ionic liquids,16,17 and solubilities in these ionic liquids can then easily be calculated. Coefficients are also available for equations related to various biological and environmental processes,18−20 and it is a matter of simple arithmetic to obtain values for these processes. All of this information can be obtained from the determination of solubilities in organic solvents and in water. If a water solubility is not available, it can be deduced, as part of the general method, as we have shown for caprolactam. It should be pointed out that the coefficients for partition coefficients in Table 1 refer specifically to 298 K, and hence our predictions of these partition coefficients and the corresponding solubilities also refer to 298 K. However, the obtained descriptors can be used in equations for processes at any temperature. For example, the descriptors in Table 5 can be used to predict solubility in water from 273 K to 573 K.21,22

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-Mail: [email protected]. Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

REFERENCES

(1) Su, J.; Quin, C.; Luo, N.; Xiang, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X. Experimental measurements and modelling of the solubility of biotin in six pure solvents at temperatures from 298.15 to 333.85 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 3894−3899. (2) Guo, C.; Li, L.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, W. Solubility of caprolactam in different organic solvents. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2012, 319, 9−15. (3) Hoover, K. R.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M. H. Correlation of the solubility behavior of crystalline 1-nitronaphthalene in organic solvents with the Abraham solvation parameter model. J. Solution Chem. 2005, 34, 1121−1133. (4) Abraham, M. H.; Smith, R. E.; Luchtefeld, R.; Boorem, A. J.; Luo, R.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Prediction of solubility of drugs and other compounds in organic solvents. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 1500−1515. (5) Stephens, T. W.; Loera, M.; Calderas, M.; Diaz, R.; Montney, N.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M. H. Determination of Abraham model solute descriptors for benzoin based on measured solubility ratios. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2012, 50, 254−265. (6) Bowen, K. R.; Stephens, T. W.; Lu, J.; Satish, K.; Shan, D.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M. H. Experimental and predicted solubilities of 3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid in select organic solvents of varying polarity and hydrogen-bonding character. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2013, 2, 577−583. 1446

DOI: 10.1021/je501140p J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 1440−1446