Development and Back-Extrapolation of NO2 Land Use Regression

Development and Back-Extrapolation of NO2 Land Use Regression Models for Historic Exposure Assessment in Great ... *Telephone: +44-0-20-7594-5027...
1 downloads 4 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Article

Development and back-extrapolation of NO2 land use regression models for historic exposure assessment in Great Britain John Gulliver, Kees de Hoogh, Anna Hansell, and Danielle Vienneau Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es4008849 • Publication Date (Web): 13 Jun 2013 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 21, 2013

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Development and back-extrapolation of NO2 land use regression models for historic

2

exposure assessment in Great Britain

3

John Gulliver1*, Kees de Hoogh1, Anna Hansell1,2, and Danielle Vienneau1,3,4

4

5

1.Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School

6

of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.

7

2. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.

8

3. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

9

4. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

10 11 12

* Corresponding author:

13 14

[email protected]

15

Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 5027

16

Fax: +44 (0)20 7594 0768

17

Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of

18

Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.

19 20

21

22

23

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

24

Page 2 of 29

TOC / Abstract Art

25 26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

37

Abstract

38

Modelling historic air pollution exposures is often restricted by availability of monitored

39

concentration data. We evaluated back-extrapolation of LUR models for annual mean NO2

40

concentrations in Great Britain for up to 18 years earlier. LUR variables were created in a

41

GIS using land cover and road network data summarized within buffers, site coordinates and

42

altitude. Four models were developed for 2009 and for 2001 using 75% of monitoring sites

43

(in different groupings) and evaluated on the remaining 25%. Variables selected were

44

generally stable between models. Within year, hold-out validation yielded MSE-R2 (i.e. fit

45

around the 1:1 line) values of 0.25~0.63 and 0.51~0.65 for 2001 and 2009, respectively.

46

Back-extrapolation was conducted for 2009 and 2001 models to 1991 and for 2009 models to

47

2001, adjusting to year using two background NO2 monitoring sites. Evaluation of back-

48

extrapolated predictions used 100% of sites from an historic national NO2 diffusion tube

49

network (n=451) for 1991, and 70 independent sites from automatic monitoring in 2001.

50

Values of MSE-R2 for back-extrapolation to 1991 were 0.42~0.45 and 0.52~0.55 for 2001

51

and 2009 models, respectively, but model performance varied by region. Back-extrapolation

52

of LUR models appears valid for exposure assessment for NO2 back to 1991 for Great

53

Britain.

54 55

Keywords

56

Air pollution modelling, back-extrapolation, exposure assessment, GIS, land use regression,

57

nitrogen dioxide.

58

59

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 29

60

1. INTRODUCTION

61

While acute health effects of air pollution are well established, the number of available

62

studies on long-term effects is more limited. In particular, few studies to date have examined

63

health impacts of air pollution exposure over periods greater than 15 years, with some notable

64

exceptions.1,2,3

65

An important factor preventing more very long-term or life-course studies being conducted is

66

not lack of health data or long running cohorts, but availability of relevant historic exposure

67

data. There are rarely enough fixed-site air pollution monitors available in continuous

68

operation and using similar monitoring techniques over time to permit use of these monitors

69

alone.

70

Dispersion and land use regression (LUR) models potentially offer better spatial and temporal

71

resolution for historic exposure estimation. Dispersion modelling3,4,5 has the advantage of not

72

requiring information from air pollution monitoring sites, but due to the general lack of

73

historic information on local-scale emissions (i.e. < 1 km) spatial resolution may be limited.

74

LUR on the other hand is relatively straightforward to apply over large geographical areas at

75

fine resolution, as long as there is good quality information on proxies for source emissions

76

(e.g. land cover, transport infrastructure, population etc.), but does require air pollution

77

monitoring data to use in model development, which may not be readily available for earlier

78

years.

79

LUR is increasingly being used in epidemiological studies to predict yearly or seasonal

80

changes in exposures to ambient air pollution for current or recent periods.6,7,8,9,10,11 Transfer

81

of LUR models in either space or time potentially offers a novel option to estimate air

82

pollution concentrations where input data are limited. The transfer of LUR models between

83

cities12 and countries13 has recently been investigated. Only a few studies14,15,16 have been 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

84

able to investigate whether it is possible to transfer (i.e. back-extrapolate) LUR models in

85

time, and there are no previous examples of evaluating the back-extrapolation of national

86

scale air pollution models prior to the year 2000. We previously were involved in developing

87

LUR models for Great Britain for NO2 and PM10 in 2001,13 black smoke and SO2 models in

88

1962, 1971, 1981 and 1991,17 and focal-sum EU-wide models of NO2 at 1km resolution for

89

2001,18 using contemporary monitoring station data, as well as development of NO219 and

90

PM metrics20 and their back-extrapolation to earlier years (not yet published in the open

91

literature) for the multi-region ESCAPE project. However, for the ESCAPE project,

92

evaluation (i.e. performance) of back-extrapolation was not possible due to a lack of

93

monitoring sites prior to year 2000. The aim of this study is to evaluate the back-

94

extrapolation of models developed for 2009 and 2001 to predict concentrations of NO2 for

95

earlier years (1991 and 2001) making use of the national automatic NO2 monitoring network

96

and data for 1991 from a historic NO2 diffusion tube network. The study takes advantage of

97

data on land cover and roads from nearest available years in model development and back

98

extrapolation.

99

100

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

101

Monitored concentrations of NO2. NO2 is one of the main pollutants of health concern which

102

continues to breach EU guideline levels at pollution hot-spots in Britain21 and can be viewed

103

as a proxy for transport-related exposure.22

104

This study takes advantage of data from the now obsolete national diffusion tube network23

105

which had several hundred sites at the peak of its operation in the early 1990s; 1991(n=451)

106

was chosen (source: AEA Technology via pers. comm.) for back-extrapolation in this study as

107

the data were analysed by a single laboratory and there is good information on data quality. 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 29

108

UK NO2 monitoring data are limited later in the 1990s following the transition to automatic

109

monitoring (Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN): http://uk-

110

air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aurn). Prior to 1996 there were less than 50

111

AURN sites operating in the UK; by the late 1990s there were over 150, including sites made

112

publically available from several local authority networks (e.g. Kent and Medway Air,

113

Automatic London Network, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Air). Data on monitored

114

concentrations for 2001 and 2009 were thus based on the AURN. Differences between

115

automatic (i.e. chemiluminescence) and non-automatic (i.e. diffusion tubes) measurement

116

methods for NO2 have been quantified and are expected to be small for longer (i.e. yearly)

117

averaging times: comparison of 4-week average concentrations yielded a Pearson’s r of 0.99

118

and systematic differences