Efficient Biocatalytic Production of Cyclodextrins by Combined Action

May 12, 2016 - Dong-Wan Koh†, Min-Oh Park†, Seong-Won Choi†, Byung-Hoo Lee§, and Sang-Ho Yoo†. † Department of Food Science & Technology an...
0 downloads 0 Views 791KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Sussex Library

Article

Efficient Biocatalytic Production of Cyclodextrins by Combined Action of Amylosucrase and Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase Dong-Wan Koh, Min-Oh Park, Seong-Won Choi, Byung-Hoo Lee, and Sang-Ho Yoo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01080 • Publication Date (Web): 12 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 12, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Efficient Biocatalytic Production of Cyclodextrins by Combined Action of Amylosucrase

2

and Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase

3 4 5

Dong-Wan Koh,† Min-Oh Park,† Seong-Won Choi,† Byung-Hoo Lee,*,§ and Sang-Ho Yoo*,†

6 7



8

Sejong University, Gunja-Dong, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, Republic of Korea

9

§

10

Department of Food Science & Technology and Carbohydrate Bioproduct Research Center,

Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, College of BioNano Technology, Gachon

University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 461-701, Republic of Korea

11 12

*Corresponding Authors :

13



14

Tel: +82-2-3408-3221; E-mail: [email protected]

15

§

16

Tel: +82-31-750-5405; E-mail: [email protected]

Sang-Ho Yoo

Byung-Hoo Lee

17 18

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

19

Page 2 of 20

ABSTRACT

20

A novel enzymatic process for cyclodextrin (CD) production was developed by utilizing

21

sucrose as raw material instead of corn starch. Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) from

22

Bacillus macerans was applied to produce the CDs from linear α-(1,4)-glucans which were

23

obtained by Neisseria polysaccharea amylosucrase (NpAS) treatment on sucrose. The greatest

24

CD yield (21.1%, w/w) was achieved from a one-pot dual enzyme reaction at 40°C for 24 h. The

25

maximum level of CD production (15.1 mg/mL) was achieved with 0.5 M sucrose in a

26

simultaneous mode of dual enzyme reaction, whereas the reaction with 0.1 M sucrose was the

27

most efficient one with regard to the conversion yield. Consequently, dual enzyme synthesis of

28

CDs was successfully carried out with no need of starch material. This result can be applied as a

29

novel efficient bioconversion process that does not require high temperature necessary for starch

30

liquefaction by thermostable α-amylase in conventional industrial processing.

31 32

Keywords: cyclodextrins, amylosucrase, cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, one-pot synthesis

33

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 20

34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

INTRODUCTION

35

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligosaccharides composed of a different number of D-

36

glucopyranoside units linked by α-(1,4)-glycosidic linkages. There are three main types of CDs

37

distinguished by the number of glucosyl units, namely α-, β-, and γ-CDs consisting of 6, 7, and 8

38

α-(1,4)-linked glucosyl units, respectively.1 These CDs have a hydrophobic central cavity, which

39

is capable of solubilizing and stabilizing hydrophobic and unstable materials by forming an

40

inclusion complex. This structural feature of CDs has made them frequently utilized chemical

41

substances in food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and chemical industries.2-4

42

CDs are commercially produced from starch by cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (EC

43

2.4.1.19, CGTase).5-7 CGTases generally catalyze the production of CDs via intramolecular

44

transglycosylation reactions. CGTase is a multifunctional enzyme that catalyzes three major

45

different reactions: cyclization, coupling, and disproportionation as well hydrolyzation as a

46

minor activity.8 Cyclization is the process through which a linear α-(1,4)-linkage is cleaved and

47

each end of the cleaved fragment is joined with the formation of cyclic oligosaccharides of

48

different sizes. Coupling is the reverse process of cyclization: the enzyme is able to cleave CDs,

49

thereby generating a linear α-(1,4)-linkage. Disproportionation is very similar to coupling, but in

50

this case, a cleaved linear α-(1,4)-linkage is joined to a second linear acceptor molecule.9,

51

During industrial CD production, corn starch is liquefied by a starch-liquefying enzyme at high

52

gelatinization temperature, and then saccharificated by CGTase.11 Many efforts have been made

53

to improve CD production by decreasing energy consumption or increasing the production yield.

54

Several studies have indicated that the reaction of CGTase with starch generates around 80% of

55

waste material that cannot be further used as a substrate for the CGTase reaction.12, 13

56

10

Amylosucrase is a glucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.4), first discovered in cultures of 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 20

57

Neisseria perflava, which catalyzes the synthesis of linear α-(1,4)-glucan polymers from sucrose

58

molecules.14 Amylosucrase from Neisseria polysaccharea (NpAS) was cloned and expressed in

59

Escherichia coli.15 When sucrose is used as sole substrate, the transferring activity of NpAS

60

elongates the linear α-(1,4)-glucan chains. In this NpAS-catalyzed reaction, the concentration of

61

sucrose influences the chain length of the glucan products.

62

Industrial CD production processes require energy-intensive, time-consuming pre-

63

gelatinization, and liquefaction steps. In this study, a novel method of CD production was

64

designed and optimized using sucrose as a highly water-soluble starting raw material. We

65

utilized CGTase to produce CDs from linear α-(1,4)-glucan molecules that was supplied by

66

amylosucrase treatment on sucrose. The strategic objective of this study was to investigate the

67

efficiency of combining the action of elongation and cyclization glycosyltransferases to improve

68

CD production in the absence of heat-transfer processing. The novel approach can be applied to

69

establish mass-production of CDs that will be utilized in wide range of industries including food

70

and pharmaceutical area.

71 72

MATERIALS AND METHODS

73

Materials. Soluble starch was purchased from Yakuri Pure Chemicals Co. (Kyoto, Japan).

74

Sucrose was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cyclodextrins

75

(α-, β-, and γ-CDs) were purchased from Wacker Chemie AG (Munich, Germany). Thermostable

76

α-amylase (Liquozyme supra®, Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), fungal α-amylase

77

(Fungamyl 800L, Novozymes A/S), and CGTase from Bacillus macerans (Amano

78

Pharmaceutical Co., Nagoya, Japan) were used for CD production from sucrose. Glucoamylase

79

from Rhizopus sp. was obtained from Toyobo Co. (Osaka, Japan). 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

80 81

CGTase assay. One unit (U) of CGTase was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced a

82

10% reduction in the intensity of blue color of amylose complex for 1 min. The enzyme solution

83

was reacted with 1.2% soluble potato starch (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO) in 1

84

mL of a 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5 at 40°C) for 10 min. To stop the enzyme reaction,

85

0.5 mL of 0.5 N acetic acid and 0.5 N HCl (5:1, v/v) was added to an aliquot (0.25 mL) of the

86

reaction mixture. Then, 5 mL of 0.005% I2 in a 0.05% KI solution was added to 0.1 mL of this

87

mixture, and the absorbance of the final solution was measured at 660 nm with a

88

spectrophotometer (DU 730, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).16

89 90

Neisseria polysaccharea amylosucrase assay. The recombinant NpAS was cloned and

91

expressed as previously described.17 One unit of NpAS was defined as the amount of enzyme

92

that releases 1 µmol of fructose per min from 0.1 M sucrose and 0.1% (w/v) waxy corn starch in

93

a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0 at 35°C. The reaction was stopped by boiling for 10 min and

94

the amount of fructose was measured by the DNS method with fructose used as the standard.18

95 96

Synthesis of linear α-glucans of different sizes in reaction mixtures containing NpAS and

97

sucrose at various concentrations. During the transglucosylating reaction, NpAS (8.4 U/mL)

98

was incubated with solutions containing different concentrations of sucrose (0.1 to 1.0 M) in 1

99

mL of a 50 mM tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0 at 40°C for 24 h. The reaction was stopped by boiling for

100

10 min and the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 9,000 × g for 10 min at 25°C to separate

101

insoluble α-(1,4)-glucan products. The synthesized α-(1,4)-glucans (100 µL, 1% w/v) were

102

dispersed in 0.9 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide. The resulting clear solution was mixed with 6 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 20

103

volumes of 99% ethanol and centrifuged at 4,500 × g for 10 min. The precipitates were dissolved

104

in 1 mL of the pre-heated 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) and then boiled for 30 min.

105

Distributions of molecular weights of insoluble linear α-(1,4)-glucans were determined

106

by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) with a refractive index detector

107

on Shodex OHpak SB-804HQ and OHpak SB-802.5 HQ columns (8 × 300 mm each, Showa

108

Denko, Tokyo, Japan). A total of 10 mg of freeze-dried α-glucans was completely wetted with

109

0.1 mL of distilled water for 10 min and then dispersed in 0.9 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide. The

110

precipitates were dissolved in 1 mL of heated distilled water and then boiled for 30 min. The

111

resulting solutions were filtered through a 0.45-µm nylon membrane filter. The aliquot (100 µL)

112

was injected and eluted with distilled water at a flow rate of 0.8 mL for 1 min at 50°C.19

113 114

One-pot synthesis of cyclodextrins from sucrose by the dual enzyme treatment. To

115

synthesize CDs, NpAS (8.4 U/mL) and CGTase (0.75 U/mL) were co-incubated with sucrose at

116

different concentrations (0.1 to 1.0 M) in 1 mL of a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0 at 40°C for

117

24 h. The reaction was stopped by boiling for 10 min. After cooling, the reaction mixture was

118

centrifuged at 9,000 × g at 25°C for 10 min. Then, 0.1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.4

119

mL of a 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) and treated with glucoamylase (8 U/mL) to

120

hydrolyze the residual linear α-(1,4)-glucans into glucose.

121 122

Cyclodextrin analysis by MALDI-TOF-MS and HPAEC. The cyclodextrin products in

123

distilled water (0.5 mg/10 µL, w/v) and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (10 mg/mL, w/v) as a matrix

124

were mixed in equal volumes (1.0 µL each). The mixture was dropped on a sample plate, and the

125

molecular-mass spectrum of CDs produced by CGTase reaction was obtained by matrix-assisted 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

126

laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS, AXIMA-LNR

127

system; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

128

CD content (%) was measured by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography

129

with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) using a CarboPac™ PA-100 analytical

130

column (4 × 250 mm, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The reaction sample (25 µL) was injected

131

and eluted with a gradient of sodium nitrate eluent (0–2 min, 8 mM; 2–22 min, 16 mM; 22–30

132

min, 17 mM; 30–40 min, 200 mM) in 150 mM NaOH with a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 30°C. The

133

amount of CDs was quantified by comparing respective peak areas to those of CD standard

134

materials.20

135 136

Statistical analysis. All measurements were made in duplicate. The analysis of variance

137

(ANOVA) was initially used for the statistical treatment of the experimental results followed by

138

Tukey’s HSD tests, if ANOVA reported a significant F value. All statistical analyses were carried

139

out using IBM® SPSS® Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).

140

Statistical significance was indicated at a confidence level of 95%.

141 142

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

143

Characterization of cyclodextrins produced by the CGTase reaction. To determine the ratio

144

of individual CDs generated by CGTase from Bacillus macerans in a control CD production

145

process, we used the liquefied normal corn starch slurry (15%, w/v) treated with 0.75 U/mL

146

CGTase at 40°C for 12 h. The production yield of individual CDs was determined by HPAEC.

147

We found that in these reaction conditions, the synthesized α-, β-, and γ-CDs comprised 54.3%,

148

35.8%, and 9.9%, respectively. The type of CDs produced by the CGTase reaction were 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 20

149

confirmed by the MALDI-TOF-MS based on their molecular masses (Fig. 1). Three major peaks

150

were detected at the same 162-dalton molecular mass interval (equal to that of a single glycosyl

151

residue), and their molecular masses corresponded to those of α-, β-, and γ-CDs.

152 153

Effects of the length of linear α-(1,4)-glucans on CD formation catalyzed by CGTase. Linear

154

α-(1,4)-glucans, which were synthesized by NpAS-catalyzed reaction from sucrose used as a sole

155

substrate, were analyzed by HPSEC (Fig. 2) and then utilized as the substrate for the CD

156

production. The molecular size of each linear α-(1,4)-glucan product was represented by the

157

degree of polymerization (DP) value at the apex of the peaks in the HPSEC chromatogram. The

158

DP values obtained in experiments with different starting concentrations of sucrose (0.1, 0.3, 0.5,

159

0.7, and 1.0 M) were 166, 116, 44, 38, and 29, respectively. Corresponding production yields of

160

linear α-glucans were 19.6%, 24.8%, 29.8%, 26.1%, and 20.3%, respectively. Thus, the sucrose

161

concentration affected the DP value of linear α-(1,4)-glucans.19 Moreover, yields positively

162

correlated with the sucrose concentration when the latter was in the range of 0.1–0.5 M. The

163

decrease of linear α-(1, 4)-glucan production at sucrose concentrations higher than 0.5 M was

164

likely caused by the utilization of sucrose in alternative reactions, which generated sucrose

165

isomers, such as turanose and trehalulose, instead of linear α-(1,4)-glucans. 21

166

In the present study, linear α-glucans of different sizes synthesized by NpAS were used in

167

CD production by CGTase in a sequential manner to determine the effect of the linear α-glucan

168

length on the properties of final products. The CD production yield was evaluated by HPAEC

169

analysis after glucoamylase treatment to remove linear α-glucan residues. The maximum

170

conversion yield of 85.1% was observed in the case of linear α-(1,4)-glucans with major peaks of

171

DP 65 and 166 that were produced from 0.1 M sucrose (Table 1). The production yield of CDs 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

172

decreased along with the linear α-(1,4)-glucan DP values. This result suggested that the

173

maximum yield of CDs synthesized by CGTase could be achieved using 0.1 M sucrose as the

174

optimal initial substrate concentration.

175 176

One-pot synthesis of CDs from sucrose by a simultaneous treatment with NpAS and

177

CGTase. CDs were synthesized from 0.1 M sucrose as a sole substrate instead of starch

178

materials by a simultaneous treatment with NpAS (8.4 U/mL) and CGTase (0.75 U/mL). The

179

time course experiment revealed that the greatest yield of CD production (17.98%) was observed

180

after 24 h (Fig. 3). However, the amount of produced CDs became lower after 48 h due to

181

CGTase-catalyzed hydrolysis of α-(1,4)-linkages that represents a minor effect of this enzyme.22

182

Depending on the initial concentration of sucrose, NpAS catalyzes the formation of linear α-

183

(1,4)-glucans of different sizes,19, 23 which can be subsequently utilized as the starting material

184

for CGTase-catalyzed CD production. In this study, the production yield of CDs by CGTase

185

negatively correlated with the starting sucrose concentration (Table 2). To produce CDs by

186

CGTase reaction, this enzyme requires the minimal size of the linear α-(1,4)-linked glucans as a

187

subtrate material which can be easily accessed through the binding pocket of the active site.4, 24 A

188

previous study showed that longer α-glucan chains were synthesized from low starting sucrose

189

concentrations by the amylosucrase reaction.23 This result demonstrates that CD production from

190

reaction mixtures that contain low concentrations of sucrose and a combination of NpAS and

191

CGTase shows a high conversion yield because the reaction condition during one-pot synthesis

192

can produce the substrate of the sufficient size for CGTase. The total amount of CDs obtained

193

from reaction mixtures with 0.3 and 0.5 M sucrose was significantly higher than that generated

194

in other reaction conditions (p < 0.05). At the same time, it appears that the reaction with 0.1 M 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 20

195

sucrose is the most efficient one with regard to the conversion yields after the combined action of

196

NpAS and CGTase.

197

In summary, in the present study, we developed and evaluated a novel process to produce

198

CDs from sucrose by a combined action of NpAS and CGTase. When 0.75 U/ml CGTase and 8.4

199

U/ml NpAS reacted with 0.1 M sucrose, the maximum CD production yield of 21.1% was

200

achieved. We found that longer linear α-(1,4)-glucans were preferred for CD production.

201

Importantly, the enzymatic production of CDs using a combined treatment with NpAS and

202

CGTase did not need prior liquefaction of starch at high temperatures, which is required in the

203

majority of industrial CD production routines. Consequently, our innovative process is an

204

effective and promising tool to utilize sucrose using green technology. As CDs have been widely

205

used as novel commercial ingredients in food and pharmaceutical products, our suggested

206

method is an important step toward ecologically safe production of this class of chemical

207

substances, the demand for which is likely to be growing in the near future.

208 209

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

210

This research was supported by High Value-added Food Technology Development Program

211

(Project number: 115035-03-1-HD020), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries,

212

Republic of Korea. This research was also supported by the Gachon University research fund of

213

2015 (GCU-2015-0058).

214 215

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

216

REFERENCES

217

1.

218

39, 1033-1046.

219

2.

220

Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 645-666.

221

3.

222

delivery systems. Int. J. Res. Ayurveda Pharm. 2011, 2, 1520-1526.

223

4.

224

cyclic α-1,4-glucans produced by the initial action of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase on

225

amylose. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 15729-15733.

226

5.

227

cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase in presence of cyclohexane. US5326701 A. 1994.

228

6.

229

brevibacterium. US5707833 A. 1998.

230

7.

231

Bald, L. Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase), obtained from Bacillus agaradherens (DSM

232

9948) and detergents and cleaning agents containing said novel cyclodextrin glucanotransferase.

233

US7888104 B2. 2011.

234

8.

235

Chemical modification of lysine side chains of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from

236

Thermoanaerobacter causes a shift from cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase to α-amylase

237

specificity. FEBS Lett. 1999, 445, 333-337.

238

9.

Valle, D.; Martin, E. M., Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review. Process Biochem. 2004,

Brewster, M. E.; Loftsson, T., Cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical solubilizers. Adv. Drug

Rita, L.; Amit, T.; Chandrashekhar, G., Current trends in β-cyclodextrin based drug

Terada, Y.; Yanase, M.; Takata, H.; Takaha, T.; Okada, S., Cyclodextrins are not the major

Shieh, W. J.; Hedges, A. R. Process for producing alpha-cyclodextrin using

Mori, S.; Mase, T.; Ohya, T. Process of making cyclodextrin glucanotransferase with

Kottwitz, B.; Maurer, K. H.; Breves, R.; Schmidt, I.; Weber, A.; Hellebrandt, A.; Polanyi-

Alcalde, M.; Plou, F. J.; Andersen, C.; Martı́n, M. T.; Pedersen, S.; Ballesteros, A.,

van der Veen, B. A.; van Alebeek, G.-J. W. M.; Uitdehaag, J. C. M.; Dijkstra, B. W.; 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

L.,

The

three

transglycosylation

reactions

catalyzed

Page 12 of 20

239

Dijkhuizen,

by

cyclodextrin

240

glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans (strain 251) proceed via different kinetic

241

mechanisms. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 658-665.

242

10.

243

glucanotransferase is operated by a Ping-Pong mechanism. FEBS Lett. 1994, 337, 66-70.

244

11.

245

glucanotransferase degrades intact granules of potato raw starch. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48,

246

962-966.

247

12.

248

Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59, 609-617.

249

13.

250

production from amaranth starch by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase produced by Paenibacillus

251

macerans CCM. Czech J. Food Sci. 2012, 30, 15-20.

252

14.

253

from sucrose. J. Biol. Chem. 1946, 166, 777-778.

254

15.

255

V.; Monsan, P., Amylosucrase from Neisseria polysaccharea: novel catalytic properties. FEBS

256

Lett. 2000, 471, 219-223.

257

16.

258

characterization of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from an alkalophilic Bacillus species and

259

transglycosylation at alkaline pHs. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 517-520.

260

17.

261

Production and characterization of digestion-resistant starch by the reaction of Neisseria

Nakamura, A.; Haga, K.; Yamane, K., The transglycosylation reaction of cyclodextrin

Yamamoto,

K.;

Zhang,

Z.

Z.;

Kobayashi,

S.,

Cycloamylose

(cyclodextrin)

Biwer, A.; Antranikian, G.; Heinzle, E., Enzymatic production of cyclodextrins. Appl.

Urban, M.; Beran, M.; Adamek, L.; Drahorad, J.; Molik, P.; Matusova., K., Cyclodextrin

Hehre, E. J.; Hamilton, D. M., Bacterial synthesis of an amylopectin-like polysaccharide

Potocki de Montalk, G.; Remaud-Simeon, M.; Willemot, R.-M.; Sarçabal, P.; Planchot,

Kometani, T.; Terada, Y.; Nishimura, T.; Takii, H.; Okada, S., Purification and

Ryu, J.-H.; Lee, B.-H.; Seo, D.-H.; Baik, M.-Y.; Park, C.-S.; Wang, R.; Yoo, S.-H.,

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

262

polysaccharea amylosucrase. Starch - Stärke 2010, 62, 221-228.

263

18.

264

Chem. 1935, 108, 51-54.

265

19.

266

cycloamyloses from sucrose by dual enzyme treatment: Combined reaction of amylosucrase and

267

4-α-glucanotransferase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5044-5051.

268

20.

269

reaction catalyzed by glycogen debranching enzyme (EC 2.4.1.25/EC 3.2.1.33) and its potential

270

for cycloamylose production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4233-4239.

271

21.

272

Development of an efficient bioprocess for turanose production by sucrose isomerisation reaction

273

of amylosucrase. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 773-779.

274

22.

275

study of the cyclization reactions of three bacterial cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferases. Appl.

276

Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1453-1460.

277

23.

278

Monsan, P.; Buleon, A., Amylose synthesized in vitro by amylosucrase: morphology, structure,

279

and properties. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 1000-1011.

280

24.

281

Bauke W.; Dijkhuizen, L., Elimination of competing hydrolysis and coupling side reactions of a

282

cyclodextrin glucanotransferase by directed evolution. Biochem. J. 2008, 413, 517-525.

Sumner, J. B.; Howell, S. F., A method for determination of saccharase activity. J. Biol.

Kim, J.-H.; Wang, R.; Lee, W.-H.; Park, C.-S.; Lee, S.; Yoo, S.-H., One-pot synthesis of

Yanase, M.; Takata, H.; Takaha, T.; Kuriki, T.; Smith, S. M.; Okada, S., Cyclization

Wang, R.; Bae, J.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, B.-S.; Yoon, S.-H.; Park, C.-S.; Yoo, S.-H.,

Terada, Y.; Sanbe, H.; Takaha, T.; Kitahata, S.; Koizumi, K.; Okada, S., Comparative

Potocki-Veronese, G.; Putaux, J.-L.; Dupeyre, D.; Albenne, C.; Remaud-Siméon, M.;

Kelly, Ronan M.; Leemhuis, H.; Rozeboom, Henriëtte J.; van Oosterwijk, N.; Dijkstra,

283 284 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 20

FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure 1. MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrins produced by CGTase from Bacillus macerans. Molecular mass of each peak is equivalent to 162n + 23 Da as determined by the number of glucosyl residues (n) and the mass of the sodium ion (Na+, 23 Da).

Figure 2. Distributions of molecular weights of linear α-(1,4)-glucans synthesized following the NpAS treatment of reaction mixtures containing sucrose at different concentrations measured by HPSEC. DP, Degree of Polymerization.

Figure 3. Time course study of the total CD production and the ratio of α-, β-, and γ-CDs in the presence of 8.4 U/mL NpAS, 0.75 U/mL CGTase, and 0.1 M sucrose during 48-h reaction.

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 1. Production Yield of CDs Synthesized by CGTase from Linear α-(1,4)-Glucans of Different Sizes Generated by a Reaction of Sucrose with 8.4 U/mL NpAS Peak DP values of glucan sample

CD type fractions (%) α-CD

β-CD

γ-CD

Total amount of CDs (mg/mL)1

29

83.8±1.0e

15.8±0.2a

0.4±0.1a

0.3±0.0a

28.9±0.3a

38

70.3±0.4b

25.7±0.3d

4. 0±0.1b

0.6±0.0b

57.2±0.3b

44

71.8±0.5c

24.2±0.3c

4.0±0.2b

0.6±0.0c

63.6±0.1c

53, 116

75.4±0.1d

21.0±0.1b

3.5±0.0b

0.6±0.0b

57.2±1.0b

65, 166

74.7±0.2d

20.7±0.1b

4.6±0.1c

0.9±0.0e

85.1±1.1e

Conversion yield (%)2

1

Mean value ± standard deviation of measurement of experiments performed in duplicate. Values denoted by different letters within the same column are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05 in ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison tests.

2

Conversion yield (%) of the CGTase reaction = (total amount of CD products) / (initial amount of the linear α-(1,4)-glucan substrate) × 100

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 20

Table 2. Quantitative Analysis of CD Products Synthesized by One-pot Dual Enzyme Reaction Using NpAS (8.4 U/mL) and CGTase (0.75 U/mL) Sucrose concentration (M)

CD type fractions (%) α-CD β-CD γ-CD

Total amont of CDs (mg/mL)1

Conversion yield (%)2

0.1

45.89±3.93b

42.02±3.39a

12.09±0.54a

7.23±1.26a

21.13±3.69c

0.3

43.73±2.23ab

41.10±1.70a

15.18±0.53b

10.79±0.95b

10.50±0.92b

0.5

41.20±2.34ab

42.73±2.16a

16.07±0.18b

10.56±1.19b

6.17±0.70ab

0.7

40.03±1.05ab

44.14±1.36a

15.83±0.28b

9.59±0.61ab

4.00±0.25a

1.0

38.34±2.29a

46.34±1.35a

15.32±0.94b

7.71±0.44a

2.25±0.13a

1

Mean value ± standard deviation of measurement of experiments performed in duplicate. Values denoted by different letters within the same column are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05 in ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison tests.

2

Conversion yield (%) of the CGTase reaction = (total amount of CD products) / (initial amount of the linear α-(1,4)-glucan substrate) × 100

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 1.

17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 18 of 20

Figure 2.

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 3.

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

TOC graphic 334x101mm (72 x 72 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 20