Subscriber access provided by University of Florida | Smathers Libraries
Article
Heterologous and high production of ergothioneine in Escherichia coli Ryo Osawa, Tomoyuki Kamide, Yasuharu Satoh, Yusuke Kawano, Iwao Ohtsu, and Tohru Dairi J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04924 • Publication Date (Web): 25 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 26, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 2 3
Heterologous and high production of ergothioneine in Escherichia coli
4 5
Ryo Osawa1, Tomoyuki Kamide1, Yasuharu Satoh2*, Yusuke Kawano3, Iwao Ohtsu3, and Tohru
6
Dairi2*
7 8
1
9
060-8628, Japan.
Graduate School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido
10
2
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan.
11
3
Innovation Medical Research Institute, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8550, Japan.
12 13
*Corresponding authors:
14
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan. Tel.
15
+81-11-706-7815; Fax. +81-11-706-7118
16
Email:
[email protected] &
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
17 18
ABSTRACT
19
Ergothioneine (ERG) is a histidine-derived thiol compound suggested to function as an
20
antioxidant and cytoprotectant in humans. Therefore, experimental trials have been conducted
21
applying ERG from mushrooms in dietary supplements and as a cosmetic additive. However, this
22
method of producing ERG is expensive, so alternative methods for ERG supply are required.
23
Five Mycobacterium smegmatis genes, egtABCDE, have been confirmed to be responsible for
24
ERG biosynthesis. This enabled us to develop practical fermentative ERG production by
25
microorganisms. In this study, we carried out heterologous and high-level production of ERG in
26
Escherichia coli using the egt genes from M. smegmatis. By high production of each of the Egt
27
enzymes and elimination of bottlenecks in the substrate supply, we succeeded in constructing a
28
production system that yielded 24 mg/L (104 µM) of secreted ERG.
29 30
Key words: ergothioneine; heterologous production; Escherichia coli
31
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 41
Page 3 of 41
32
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION
33
Ergothioneine (ERG), a histidine-derived thiol compound, was isolated from an ergot
34
fungus, Claviceps purpurea, more than a century ago. ERG is also known to be synthesized in
35
actinobacteria, cyanobacteria, and a fission yeast.1,2,3 Recent studies show that ERG functions as
36
an antioxidant like glutathione, mycothiol, and bacillithiol. There is no direct evidence for
37
biosynthesis of ERG in humans. However, ERG has been reported to be accumulated in various
38
cells and tissues at high concentrations, probably by intake from diets such as mushrooms and red
39
beans that contain relatively large amounts of ERG, through an ERG-specific organic cation
40
transporter, OCTN1.4,5
41
The presence of the ERG-specific transporter and the extensive accumulation of ERG in
42
tissues suggest that ERG should have significant biological functions in humans. Although the
43
true physiological role of ERG in humans has yet to be fully understood, ERG has been shown by
44
in vitro experiments to function as an antioxidant and a cytoprotectant. Therefore, applications of
45
ERG in dietary supplements and as a cosmetic additive have been explored, and there is an
46
increasing demand for ERG.6 Mushrooms have traditionally been the source of ERG.7 However,
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
47
slow growth, low content and time-consuming purification procedures lead to a high
48
manufacturing cost. Therefore, alternative and sustainable sources of ERG are necessary.
49
One such reliable and practical method is a fermentative process using microorganisms such
50
as actinobacteria and cyanobacteria that are known to produce ERG. However, their ERG
51
productivities are very low (1.18 mg/g dry weight after 4 weeks cultivation of Mycobacterium
52
avium and 0.8 mg/g dry weight of Oscillatoria sp.)2,8 and thus genetic and metabolic engineering
53
are indispensable for industrial production. Until recently, however, there were no reports on
54
ERG biosynthesis genes and enzymes. In 2010, five genes in Mycobacterium smegmatis,
55
egtABCDE, were confirmed to be responsible for ERG biosynthesis (Figure 1).9 In the
56
biosynthetic pathway, EgtD catalyzes the formation of hercynine (HER) by transfer of three
57
methyl groups derived from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to L-histidine (L-His). Then, EgtB
58
catalyzes O2-dependent C–S bond formation between γ-glutamylcysteine (γGC) supplied by
59
EgtA and HER to form hercynyl-γ-glutamylcysteine-sulfoxide (γGC-HER). This is followed by
60
removal of the
61
hercynylcysteine-sulfoxide (Cys-HER). Then, EgtE, a PLP-dependent C–S lyase, catalyzes the
62
formation of ERG with concomitant formation of pyruvate and ammonia as side-products.
L-glutamate
(L-Glu) moiety by EgtC, an amidohydrolase, to produce
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 41
Page 5 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
63
In this study, we developed heterologous and high-level production of ERG in Escherichia
64
coli using the egt genes from M. smegmatis. By high productionion of each of the Egt enzymes
65
and elimination of bottlenecks in substrate supply, the production system yielded 24 mg/L (104
66
µM) of secreted ERG.
67 68
MATERIALS AND METHODS
69
General. LB broth (Lennox) medium was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Japan K.K.
70
(Tokyo, Japan), L-Met and L-His were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industry (Osaka,
71
Japan), and HER was purchased from Shinsei Chemical Company Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Other
72
chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industry or
73
Sigma-Aldrich Japan. Primers were obtained from FASMAC Co. Ltd. (Kanagawa, Japan).
74
Enzymes and kits for DNA manipulation were purchased from Takara Bio Inc. (Shiga, Japan) or
75
New England Biolabs Japan Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). PCR were carried out using a GeneAmp PCR
76
System 9700 thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with Tks Gflex
77
DNA polymerase (Takara Bio). General genetic manipulations of E. coli were performed
78
according to standard protocols. High-resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform mass
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
79
spectrometry (HR-ESI-FT-MS) analysis was performed using an Exactive system (Thermo
80
Fisher Scientific Inc.).
81 82
Bacterial Strains and Cultures. Microorganisms used in this study are summarized in Table
83
1. E. coli XL1-Blue (Nippon Gene Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), BL21(DE3) (Merck KGaA,
84
Darmstadt, Germany), and BW25113 (National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan) that is a
85
high producer of L-Cys utilized for a sulfur donor of ERG10 were used for plasmid construction,
86
protein production, and ERG production, respectively. The media used were LB broth and M9Y
87
minimal medium prepared by adding 1% (w/v) glucose, 5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 0.1%
88
(w/v) yeast extract (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to M9 minimal
89
salts (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Ampicillin (Ap), chloramphenicol (Cm), kanamycin
90
(Km), streptomycin (Sm), and tetracycline (Tc) were added to the media at concentrations of 100,
91
33, 25, 20, and 5 mg/L, if necessary. Optical density (OD) at 600 nm was measured with a
92
NanoDrop 2000C spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
93
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 41
Page 7 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
94
Preparation of Egt Recombinant Enzymes. Detailed plasmid construction methods are
95
described in Supporting Information (Supplementary methods 1) and the plasmids are
96
summarized in Table 2. Briefly, EgtB, C, D and E were amplified by PCR using M. smegmatis
97
genomic DNA as the template and appropriate primers (Table S1) in which restriction sites were
98
introduced at the N- and C-termini. The PCR products were respectively cloned into the
99
expression vectors. The plasmids obtained were introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3). A liquid
100
culture of the transformant in LB supplied with appropriate antibiotic was induced by adding 0.5
101
mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) when the optical density at 600 nm reached
102
about 0.6. The cultivation was continued for an additional 16 h at 20°C. The production of each
103
recombinant enzyme was analyzed by sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
104
(SDS-PAGE) with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. The purification of each recombinant
105
protein was carried out using Ni-NTA agarose (QIAGEN K.K., Tokyo, Japan) or amylose resins
106
(New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Protein concentrations were
107
determined using a Bradford protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA)
108
with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
109
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
110
ERG Production. E. coli harboring plasmids carrying ERG biosynthetic genes (Figure 2)
111
was cultured in 3 mL of M9Y media at 30°C for 16 h. The cultures (1 mL) were inoculated into
112
50 mL of M9Y media supplemented with 0.5 g/L L-His, 0.5 g/L L-Met, and 20 mg/L FeSO4.7H2O
113
in 200-mL Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated at 30°C with shaking (200 rpm) for up to 72 h.
114
Na2S2O3 was added to media at 20 mM, if needed. IPTG was added to a final concentration of
115
0.5 mM after 3 h of cultivation. Samples (1 mL) were collected at appropriate time points and
116
analyzed by LC-ESI-MS.
117 118
LC-ESI-MS Analysis of Products. Mixtures of 0.05% (v/v) heptafluorobutyric acid
119
(HFBA) solution (180 µL) and culture broth or enzymatic reaction solutions (20 µL) were
120
analyzed. The LC-ESI-MS conditions were: Waters ACQUITY UPLC system equipped with a
121
photodiode array and a SQ Detector2 (Tokyo, Japan); XBridge BEH C18 XP column (150 mm L
122
× 2.0 mm; ID, 2.5 µm; Waters); flow rate, 0.15 mL/min; temperature, 35°C; mobile phase, water
123
containing 0.05% HFBA and 7% methanol; injection volume, 2 µL; detection, 210 nm for His
124
and HER, 250 nm for Cys-HER and γGC-HER, and 258 nm for ERG.
125
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 41
Page 9 of 41
126
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
127
The most reliable strategy for high production of ERG is overproduction of each of the
128
enzymes for ERG biosynthesis and then optimization of any inefficient biosynthetic step(s)
129
(identified by intermediate accumulation) by molecular genetics and metabolic engineering. If no
130
intermediates accumulate, supply of the initial substrates, L-His, L-Glu, L-Cys, and L-Met, should
131
be enhanced.
132
ERG biosynthetic genes are present in some microorganisms such as actinobacteria,
133
cyanobacteria, and α-proteobacteria.11 Among these bacteria, we selected M. smegmatis as the
134
gene source, because the ERG biosynthetic pathway was first identified in this strain and the
135
biosynthesis genes constitute an operon.9 Since egtB, egtC and egtE are translationally coupled,
136
we first tried expressing the egt genes as the operon with tac and T7 promoters. We constructed
137
several plasmids utilizing pQE1a-Red and pET-21a, but ERG productivities of transformants
138
harboring the plasmids were low (less than 0.2 mg/L). Therefore, we overexpressed egt genes
139
stepwise under the control of individual promoters by checking production of recombinant
140
enzymes and their activities by production of intermediate compounds (HER, γGC-HER, and
141
Cys-HER) and ERG by in vitro experiment (Figure 1). Since E. coli has an egtA ortholog, gshA,
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
142
which is responsible for glutathione biosynthesis,12 we expressed the other genes, egtB, C, D, and
143
E. We also prepared the intermediate compounds, which are not commercially available, with the
144
recombinant enzymes to obtain standards for quantitative analysis (Supplementary methods 2).
145 146
Overproduction of Recombinant Enzymes. For overproduction of Egt enzymes, we used
147
pQE1a-Red and pCF1s-Red, both of which are home-constructed and compatible vectors with
148
the tac promoter for protein production (Figure S1). As Figure S2 shows, transformants
149
harboring pCF1s-MsD carrying egtD overproduced EgtD in soluble form. To confirm whether
150
the recombinant protein had the expected activity, we carried out in vitro experiments with cell
151
free extracts containing the recombinant enzyme.9,13 The cell free extracts were incubated with
152
L-His
153
peak with the same retention time and MS spectrum as the HER standard was clearly detected
154
after 1 h of incubation, demonstrating that EgtD converted L-His into HER (Figure S3).
and excess SAM. After the reaction, the product was analyzed by LC-ESI-MS. A specific
155
We next overproduced recombinant EgtB using pQE1a-Red (Figure S1) and changing the
156
probable start codon TTG into ATG. However, recombinant EgtB formed inclusion bodies in
157
multiple culture conditions. Therefore, a plasmid from which a recombinant enzyme is produced
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 41
Page 11 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
158
as a maltose binding protein (MBP)-fused enzyme was examined. We successfully produced a
159
MBP-fused EgtB in a soluble form in transformants harboring pQE1a-mMsB. To confirm
160
whether the recombinant enzyme had the expected activity, we carried out in vitro experiments
161
with purified recombinant enzyme (Figure S4).9 The recombinant MBP-fused EgtB was
162
incubated with HER and γGC for 2 h. As Figure S5 shows, HER completely disappeared, and the
163
formation of a new product with m/z 462.20 was detected. Based on HR-ESI-FT-MS analysis of
164
the purified compound, the molecular formula of the product was determined to be C17H27O8N5S
165
(m/z: [M+H]+ calculated for C17H28O8N5S+, 462.16531; observed, 462.16507), which
166
corresponded to that of γGC-HER, suggesting the formation of γGC-HER. The thus formed
167
intermediate compound γGC-HER was purified by HPLC (Supplementary methods 2) and used
168
as a standard for quantitative analysis.
169
Finally, overproduction of recombinant EgtC and EgtE was examined. We first used the
170
same vector as for EgtB production but no production of either enzyme was observed. We then
171
examined a plasmid from which a recombinant enzyme is produced as a His-tagged enzyme. In
172
this case, both EgtC and EgtE were successfully overproduced. To confirm whether the
173
recombinant enzymes had the expected activity, we carried out in vitro experiments with the
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
174
purified recombinant enzymes (Figure S4).9 Recombinant EgtC was incubated with
175
enzymatically prepared γGC-HER. After 17 h of reaction, the product was analyzed by
176
LC-ESI-MS. As shown in Figure 3, a new peak with m/z 333.23 was detected and Cys-HER
177
formation was suggested. Based on HR-ESI-FT-MS analysis of the purified compound, the
178
molecular formula of the product was determined to be C12H20O5N4S (m/z: [M+H]+ calculated for
179
C12H21O5N4S+, 333.12272; observed, 333.12290), which corresponded to that of Cys-HER. The
180
thus formed Cys-HER was purified (Supplementary methods 2) and used as a standard for
181
quantitative analysis.
182
By adding recombinant EgtE together with EgtC into the EgtB reaction mixture, we
183
confirmed the formation of ERG by LC-ESI-MS analysis (Figure 4), showing that all the
184
recombinant Egt enzymes possessed the expected activities.
185 186
Simultaneous production of Egt Enzymes for ERG Production. To reconstruct the
187
ERG-producing pathway in E. coli, we optimized the production conditions in a stepwise
188
manner: HER, then γGC-HER, and finally ERG production (Figure 1 and 2).
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 41
Page 13 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
189
The first step was HER production. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD (named strain
190
ET1) was cultured in M9Y medium and 91 ± 2 mg/L HER (460 ± 10 µM) was produced in the
191
culture broth after 48 h. We then carried out feeding experiments with L-His and L-Met, because
192
amino acid biosynthesis in E. coli is strictly regulated by feedback inhibition and/or
193
transcriptional repression. L-Met and L-His feeding increased the yield: 164 ± 3 mg/L HER (833
194
± 15 µM) was produced after 48 h of cultivation (Figure 5). After this, L-His and L-Met feeding
195
was employed in all in vivo production experiments.
196
We next carried out in vivo coproduction of EgtD and EgtB for γGC-HER production.
197
Transformants of E. coli BW25113 carrying both pCF1s-MsD and pQE1a-mMsB (strain ET2)
198
were cultivated in the medium supplemented with L-His and L-Met. As Figure 6 shows, we
199
confirmed 24 ± 1 mg/L γGC-HER (52 ± 2 µM) production after 24-h cultivation, indicating that
200
EgtB converted HER to γGC-HER using endogenous γGC in E. coli. However, accumulation of
201
3-fold higher amounts of HER (110 ± 5 mg/L) than Cys-HER (36 ± 2 mg/L) was detected,
202
suggesting that γGC-HER production was rate limiting.
203
For simultaneous expression of all egt genes, egtC and egtE, both of which were expressed
204
from the tac promoter of pQE1a, were recloned into plasmid pACYCDuet-1, which is compatible
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
205
with pQE1a-Red and pCF1s-Red, to construct pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE (Figure 2 and Supplementary
206
methods 1). The plasmid was successfully constructed and production of both enzymes in soluble
207
forms in E. coli was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Figure S6). The plasmid was introduced into
208
strain ET2 to construct strain ET3 and recombinant enzyme production was examined. As Figure
209
S7 shows, all the enzymes were produced in soluble forms. We then examined ERG production.
210
Strain ET3 produced 19 ± 2 mg/L (83 ± 8 µM) ERG together with 73 ± 15 mg/L (370 ± 76 µM)
211
HER in the culture broth after 72 h of cultivation (Figure 7 and Table 3). These results suggested
212
that the EgtB-catalyzed reaction is a bottleneck.
213 214
ERG Production and Improvement of Rate-limiting Steps. Considering that EgtB was
215
overproduced in a soluble form in the producing strain ET3, and that it showed enough activity in
216
in vitro experiments, we considered that insufficient supply of γGC, the substrate of EgtB, might
217
cause the accumulation of HER. To test this hypothesis, overproduction of γGC synthetase was
218
carried out. To produce γGC synthetase, the gshA gene from E. coli12 was cloned and inserted
219
into pQE1a-mMsB to construct pQE1a-mMsB/EcA. Although MBP-fused EgtB and GshA were
220
produced in soluble forms in E. coli BW25113 harboring the three plasmids (strain ET4) (Figure
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 41
Page 15 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
221
S8), ERG productivity was decreased compared to that of strain ET3, to 17 ± 1 mg/L (72 ± 2
222
µM) after 72-h cultivation (Table 3). Comparing SDS-PAGE data for strains ET3 and ET4
223
(Figures S7 and S8), soluble MBP-fused EgtB was found to be decreased in strain ET4. This
224
could be the reason for the reduced productivity.
225
We then employed another strategy to enhance the γGC supply. In ERG biosynthesis, γGC is
226
used as a sulfur donor. In particular, L-Cys is a net sulfur donor, because the L-Glu moiety of
227
γGC is released by EgtC. Therefore, reinforcement of L-Cys flux may be effective in enhancing
228
γGC flux and ERG production. Since L-Cys addition into media was reported to be toxic to E.
229
coli cells,14 we employed another strategy. We have been studying a L-Cys biosynthetic pathway
230
in E. coli and demonstrated that thiosulfate (S2O32–) was a better sulfur source than sulfate
231
(SO42–) for high L-Cys production.10 We therefore fed thiosulfate into the growth media. When
232
strain ET3 was cultured in M9Y supplemented with
233
productivity was increased to 24 ± 4 mg/L (104 ± 17 µM) (Table 3), indicating that
234
reinforcement of L-Cys flux was very effective in enhancing the ERG production.
L-Met, L-His,
and thiosulfate, ERG
235
In conclusion, to establish a reliable and practical method for ERG supply, fermentative ERG
236
production by microorganisms was investigated. We heterologously overexpressed genes
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 41
237
egtBCDE of M. smegmatis in E. coli and succeeded in the production of ERG (19 mg/L).
238
Reinforcement of the γGC supply by feeding of thiosulfate, a suitable sulfur donor for high L-Cys
239
production, resulted in higher ERG production (24 mg/L). Considering the reported ERG
240
contents of mushrooms were from 0.15 to 7.27 mg/g dry weight,7 our system might become an
241
alternative method for ERG supply. However, significant amounts of HER still accumulated,
242
suggesting that more supply of γGC and L-Cys by metabolic engineering and use of another EgtB
243
with higher activity are indispensable for high-level production of ERG.
244 245 246
ABBREVIATIONS USED ERG,
ergothioneine;
HER,
hercynine;
γ-glutamylcysteine;
γGC-HER,
247
hercynyl-γ-glutamylcysteine-sulfoxide;
248
S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; L-histidine, L-His; L-glutamate, L-Glu;
249
L-cysteine, L-Cys; L-methionine, L-Met;
250
mass
251
dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE.
spectrometry,
Cys-HER,
γGC,
hercynylcysteine-sulfoxide;
SAM,
high-resolution electrospray ionization Fourier transform
HR-ESI-FT-MS;
maltose
binding
252
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
protein,
MBP;
sodium
Page 17 of 41
253
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
254
We are grateful to Professor Tsutomu Sato (Graduate School of Science and Technology,
255
Niigata University, Japan) for providing M. smegmatis genomic DNA. This work was supported
256
by the Technology Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food
257
Industry (26027AB) from MAFF, Japan (to I.O.). We thank James Allen, DPhil, from Edanz
258
Group (www.edanzediting.com) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
259 260
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
261 262 263
The Supporting information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at xxx. Supplementary methods. Figure S1. Vectors pQE1a-Red and pCF1s-Red. Figure S2.
264
SDS-PAGE analysis of EgtD production. Figure S3. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtD reaction
265
products. Figure S4. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant EgtB, EgtC, and EgtE. Figure
266
S5. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtB reaction products. Figure S6. SDS-PAGE analysis of
267
recombinant EgtC and EgtE production. Figure S7. SDS-PAGE analysis of production of
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
268
recombinant Egt enzymes in strain ET3. Figure S8. SDS-PAGE analysis of production of
269
recombinant Egt enzymes and GshA in strain ET4. Table S1. Primers used in this study.
270 271
REFERENCES
272
(1) Genghof, D.S. Biosynthesis of ergothioneine and hercynine by fungi and Actinomycetales. J.
273
Bacteriol. 1970, 103, 475–478.
274
(2) Pfeiffer, C.; Bauer, T.; Surek, B.; Schömig, E.; Gründemann, D. Cyanobacteria produce high
275
levels of ergothioneine. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1766–1769.
276
(3) Pluskal, T.; Ueno M.; Yanagida, M. Genetic and metabolomic dissection of the ergothioneine
277
and selenoneine biosynthetic pathway in the fission yeast, S. pombe, and construction of an
278
overproduction system. PLoS One, 2014, 9, e97774.
279
(4) Gründemann, D.; Harlfinger, S.; Golz, S.; Geerts, A.; Lazar, A.; Berkels, R.; Jung, N.;
280
Rubbert, A.; Schömig, E. Discovery of the ergothioneine transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
281
2005, 102, 5256–5261.
282
(5) Cheah, I.K.; Halliwell, B. Ergothioneine; antioxidant potential, physiological function and role
283
in disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2012, 1822, 784–793.
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 41
Page 19 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
284
(6) Aruoma, O.I.; Coles, L.S.; Landes, B.; Repine, J.E. Functional benefits of ergothioneine and
285
fruit- and vegetable-derived nutraceuticals: overview of the supplemental issue contents. Prev.
286
Med., 2012, 54, S4–S8.
287
(7) Kalaras, M.D.; Richie J.P.; Calcagnotto, A.; Beelman, R.B. Mushrooms: A rich source of the
288
antioxidants ergothioneine and glutathione. Food Chem., 2017, 233, 429–433
289
(8) Genghof, D.S.; Van Damme, O. Biosynthesis of ergothioneine and hercynine by mycobacteria.
290
J. Bacteriol. 1964, 87, 852–862.
291
(9) Seebeck, F.P. In vitro reconstitution of Mycobacterial ergothioneine biosynthesis. J. Am.
292
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6632–6633.
293
(10) Kawano, Y.; Onishi, F.; Shiroyama, M.; Miura, M.; Tanaka, N.; Oshiro, S.; Nonaka, G.;
294
Nakanishi, T.; Ohtsu, I. Improved fermentative L-cysteine overproduction by enhancing a newly
295
identified thiosulfate assimilation pathway in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2017,
296
101, 6879–6889.
297
(11) Jones, G.W.; Doyle, S.; Fitzpatrick, D.A. The evolutionary history of the genes involved in the
298
biosynthesis of the antioxidant ergothioneine. Gene, 2014, 549, 161–170.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
299
(12) Watanabe, K.; Yamano, Y.; Murata, K.; Kimura, A. The nucleotide sequence of the gene for
300
γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res., 1986, 14, 4393–4400.
301
(13) Vit, A.; Misson, L.; Blankenfeldt, W.; Seebeck, F.P. Ergothioneine biosynthetic
302
methyltransferase EgtD reveals the structural basis of aromatic amino acid betaine biosynthesis.
303
ChemBioChem, 2015, 16, 119–125.
304
(14) Kari, C.; Nagy, Z.; Kovács, P.; Hernádi, F. Mechanism of the growth inhibitory effect of
305
cysteine on Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol., 1971, 68, 349–356.
306 307
FIGURE CAPTIONS
308
Figure 1. ERG biosynthetic pathway.
309
Figure 2. Plasmids for ERG production.
310
Figure 3. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtC reaction products.
311
(a) Traces at 250 nm of reaction products. The reaction (40 µL) was carried out by adding
312
purified recombinant EgtC (3.9 µM) (i) or boiled EgtC (ii) to the EgtB reaction solution at 25°C
313
for 17 h.
314
(b) MS spectrum of EgtC reaction product (ESI positive mode).
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 41
Page 21 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
315
Figure 4. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtE reaction products.
316
(a) Traces at 250 nm of ERG standard (i) and reaction products (ii). The reaction (40 µL) was
317
carried out by adding purified recombinant EgtE (2.5 µM) and EgtC (3.9 µM) (ii) to boiled
318
supernatant of EgtB reaction mixture containing 2 mM dithiothreitol at 25°C for 17 h.
319
(b) MS spectra of ERG standard (i) and EgtE reaction product (ii) (ESI positive mode).
320
Figure 5. Culture profiles of strain ET1. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD (strain ET1)
321
was cultured in M9Y medium supplemented with L-His and L-Met. After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM
322
of IPTG was added into the medium. Data are presented as mean values with standard errors
323
from three independent experiments.
324
Figure 6. Culture profiles of strain ET2. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD and
325
pQE1a-mMsB (strain ET2) was cultured in M9Y medium supplemented with L-His and L-Met.
326
After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM of IPTG was added into the medium. Data are presented as mean
327
values with standard errors from three independent experiments.
328
Figure 7. Culture profiles of strain ET3. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD,
329
pQE1a-mMsB, and pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE (strain ET3) was cultured in M9Y medium
330
supplemented with L-His and L-Met. After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM of IPTG was added into the
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
331
medium. Data are presented as mean values with standard errors from three independent
332
experiments.
333
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 41
Page 23 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
334
Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study.
335
Strains
336
M. smegmatis JCM6386 ERG producer
337
E. coli
Descriptions
Source JCMa
338
XL1-Blue
hsdR17, recA1, endA1, gyrA96, thi-1, supE44, relA1, lac[F’, proAB, lacIqZ∆M15, Tn10(TcR)] Nippon Gene
339
BL21(DE3)
F−, ompT hsdSB(rB− mB−) gal dcm (DE3)
Merck
340
BW25113
rrnB3 ∆lacZ4787 hsdR514 ∆(araBAD)567 ∆(rhaBAD)568 rph-1
NIGb
341
ET1
BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD
This study
342
ET2
BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD, pQE1a-mMsB
This study
343
ET3
BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD, pQE1a-mMsB, pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE
This study
344
ET4
BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD, pQE1a-mMsB/EcA, pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE
This study
345
a
346
b
Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Riken BioResource Center. National Institute of Genetics
347 348
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 41
349
Table 2. Plasmids used in this study.
350
Plasmids
Description
Source
351
pQE1a-Red
Protein production plasmid, tac promoter, ColE1 ori, ApR
Lab stock
352
pCF1s-Red
Protein production plasmid, tac promoter, CDF ori, SmR
Lab stock
353
pET-21a
Protein production plasmid, T7 promoter, pBR322 ori, ApR
Merck
354
pACYCDuet-1
Protein production plasmid, T7 promoter, p15A ori, CmR
Merck
355
pQE1a-MsB
pQE1a-Red derivative, production of EgtB
This study
356
pQE1a-mMsB
pQE1a-MsB derivative, production of MBP-fused EgtB
This study
357
pQE1a-mMsB/EcA
pQE1a-mMsB derivative, coproduction of MBP-fused EgtB and GshA
This study
358
pQE1a-MsC
pQE1a-Red derivative, production of EgtC
This study
359
pQE1a-hMsC
pQE1a-MsC derivative, production of 6×His-tagged EgtC
This study
360
pQE1a-MsE
pQE1a-Red derivative, production of EgtE
This study
361
pQE1a-hMsE
pQE1a-Red derivative, production of 6×His-tagged EgtE
This study
362
pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE
pACYCDuet-1 derivative, coproduction of 6×His-tagged EgtC and EgtE
This study
363
pCF1s-MsD
pCF1s-Red derivative, production of EgtD
This study
364 365
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
366
Table 3. Culture profiles of ET3 and ET4 strains.
367
Strains
368
OD
HER
γGC-HER
Cys-HER
ERG
[–]
[mg/L]
[mg/L]
[mg/L]
[mg/L]
ND
10 ± 2
19 ± 2
1±1
9±1
17 ± 1
ND
9±0
24 ± 4
369
ET3a
10.1 ± 0.5
73 ± 15
370
ET4a
8.7 ± 0.2
121 ± 12
371
ET3b
11.1 ± 0.5
48 ± 17
372 373
ND, not detected.
374
Data after 72 h cultivation are presented as mean values with standard error from three independent experiments.
375
a
ET3 and ET4 were cultured in M9Y media supplemented with L-His and L-Met.
376
b
ET3 was cultured in M9Y media supplemented with L-His, L-Met, and thiosulfate.
377
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
N
NH L -His
H 2N
3 x L -Met + 3 x ATP
COOH
3 x SAM
HER production
EgtD 3 x SAH N
NH
HER N
EgtA/ + L-Glu GshA + ATP
L-Cys
COO
γGC + O 2
EgtB
COOH
H N
H 2N
γGC-HER production
COOH O
O
S
γGC-HER N
NH
N COO
EgtC
L -Glu H 2N
COOH
ERG production
O S N
NH
Cys-HER
N COO
EgtE
Pyruvate + NH 3, [O] S HN
NH
ERG N
378
COO
379 380
Figure 1. ERG biosynthetic pathway.
381
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 41
Page 27 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
382 383 384
Figure 2. Plasmids for ERG production.
385
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
386 387 388
Figure 3. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtC reaction products.
389
(a) Traces at 250 nm of reaction products. The reaction (40 µL) was carried out by adding
390
purified recombinant EgtC (3.9 µM) (i) or boiled EgtC (ii) to the EgtB reaction solution at 25°C
391
for 17 h.
392
(b) MS spectrum of EgtC reaction product (ESI positive mode).
393 394
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 41
Page 29 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
395 396 397
Figure 4. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtE reaction products.
398
(a) Traces at 250 nm of ERG standard (i) and reaction products (ii). The reaction (40 µL) was
399
carried out by adding purified recombinant EgtE (2.5 µM) and EgtC (3.9 µM) (ii) to boiled
400
supernatant of EgtB reaction mixture containing 2 mM dithiothreitol at 25°C for 17 h.
401
(b) MS spectra of ERG standard (i) and EgtE reaction product (ii) (ESI positive mode).
402
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
200
Page 30 of 41
15 HER
Conc. [mg/L]
10 100
OD [–]
OD
150
5 50
0
0 0
24
48
Times [h]
403 404 405
Figure 5. Culture profiles of strain ET1. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD (strain ET1)
406
was cultured in M9Y medium supplemented with L-His and L-Met. After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM
407
of IPTG was added into the medium. Data are presented as mean values with standard errors
408
from three independent experiments.
409
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
120
15 HER
100 10 Cys-HER
60
OD
40
OD [–]
Conc. [mg/L]
γGC-HER
80
5
20 0
0 0
410 411
24
48
Times [h]
412
Figure 6. Culture profiles of strain ET2. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD and
413
pQE1a-mMsB (strain ET2) was cultured in M9Y medium supplemented with L-His and L-Met.
414
After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM of IPTG was added into the medium. Data are presented as mean
415
values with standard errors from three independent experiments.
416
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Conc. [mg/L]
80
HER
γGC-HER
Cys-HER
ERG
15
OD
10
60 40
OD [–]
100
Page 32 of 41
5 20 0
0 0
24
48
72
Times [h]
417 418 419
Figure 7. Culture profiles of strain ET3. E. coli BW25113 harboring pCF1s-MsD,
420
pQE1a-mMsB, and pAC1c-hMsC/hMsE (strain ET3) was cultured in M9Y medium
421
supplemented with L-His and L-Met. After 3 h cultivation, 0.5 mM of IPTG was added into the
422
medium. Data are presented as mean values with standard errors from three independent
423
experiments.
424
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 41
425
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic
426 N
NH
COOH
EgtB
H N
H 2N
COOH O
O
N
S
GshA
γ-Glu-Cys
COO
N
NH
Cys + Glu 3 × Met
3 × SAM
N H 2N
EgtD
O
S N H 2N
427
NH
HN
EgtC
S NH
N
EgtE
N COOH
COO
COOH
N
COO
Heterologous and high production of ergothioneine in E. coli COO
NH
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1. ERG biosynthetic pathway. 271x398mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 41
Page 35 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
egtD
HER production
pCF1s-MsD lacI
CloDF13 ori
MBP
γGC-HER production
egtB
MBP
ColE1 ori
ApR
lacI
ColE1 ori
ApR
tac promoter
T7 terminator
His-tag
rrnB terminator
egtC
egtE
pAC1c-hMsE/hMsC lacI
gshA
egtB
pQE1a-mMsB/EcA
pQE1a-mMsB lacI
ERG production
SmR
p15A ori
CmR
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
MBP MBP-tag
cspA terminator
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtC reaction products. (a) Traces at 250 nm of reaction products. The reaction (40 µL) was carried out by adding purified recombinant EgtC (3.9 µM) (i) or boiled EgtC (ii) to the EgtB reaction solution at 25°C for 17 h. (b) MS spectrum of EgtC reaction product (ESI positive mode).
68x21mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 41
Page 37 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4. LC-ESI-MS analysis of EgtE reaction products. (a) Traces at 250 nm of ERG standard (i) and reaction products (ii). The reaction (40 µL) was carried out by adding purified recombinant EgtE (2.5 µM) and EgtC (3.9 µM) (ii) to boiled supernatant of EgtB reaction mixture containing 2 mM dithiothreitol at 25°C for 17 h. (b) MS spectra of ERG standard (i) and EgtE reaction product (ii) (ESI positive mode). 80x35mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
15of 41 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry Page 38 HER OD
150
10 100 5 50 0
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
0
24
Times [h]
0 48
OD [–]
Conc. [mg/L]
200
Page 120 39 of 41 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry HER
15
γGC-HER
80 60
10
Cys-HER OD
40
5
20 0
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
0
24
Times [h]
0 48
OD [–]
Conc. [mg/L]
100
Conc. [mg/L]
80
15of 41 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry Page 40 HER γGC-HER Cys-HER
ERG
OD
10
60 40
5
20 0 0
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
24
48
Times [h]
0 72
OD [–]
100
Page 41 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC graphic 48x27mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment